Scoring Rubric for Electronic Portfolio

Criteria Purpose of Portfolio Advanced/Proficient (4-5 pts) Basic (2-3 pts.) Below Basic (0-1 pts.) Self Eval. Total

The home page explicitly mentions important The home page contains some information about Home page does not contain information to concepts (such as breadth of content and the purpose of the portfolio, but there is explain the purpose of the portfolio. 5 intended audience) and prepares the reader for missing information. Reader might be confused. what is in the portfolio. Type size and/or color, images, graphics and sounds are used well. Appropriate use of backgrounds and text are used to promote understanding and readability. The portfolio is well designed, logical and easy to navigate. Contact information is included where needed. No errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. All individual and group projects are included. Type size and/or color, images, graphics, background, and sounds are mostly used well. Some improvements could be made to improve understanding and readability. The portfolio is not intuitive, & needs further organization to improve navigation. Contact information is included where needed. Some spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors. Most individual and group projects included. Artifacts in portfolio showcase high levels of technology integration (LoTi Level 3 or higher) some of the time that promote active use of technology to enhance learning for students. There is little difference in contrast between text/background, OR color, graphics, sounds interfere with text, and legibility suffers. 5 The portfolio is unorganized. Internal navigation links are either not present or not functioning properly. Contact information is missing. There are many errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar. Many projects are not included.

Overall Appeal & Usability

Content

Artifacts in portfolio consistently showcase Level of high levels of technology integration (LoTi Level Technology 3 or higher) that promote active use of Integration technology to enhance learning for students.

Artifacts in portfolio rarely showcase high levels of technology integration (LoTi Level 5 3 or higher) that promote active use of technology to enhance learning for students. Artifacts in portfolio rarely showcase specific and appropriate teaching strategies for diverse learners.

UDL

Artifacts in portfolio consistently showcase Artifacts in portfolio somewhat showcase specific and appropriate teaching strategies to specific and appropriate teaching strategies to meet the needs of diverse learners. meet the needs of diverse learners.

Detailed narratives about what you know and can Narratives about what you know and can do do are included with content and related included with content and related artifacts to Reflection/ artifacts to support proficient or advanced support basic attainment of technology Narratives attainment of technology standards and course standards and course objectives or narratives objectives. are too general or brief to be able to assess level of expertise. Project Revisions Page 2 of the rubric is completely filled out. Page 2 of the rubric is partially completed.

Narratives about what you know and can do not consistently included with content and related artifacts to support attainment of 5 technology standards and course objectives. Page 2 of the rubric is not completed.

Portfolio contains a thorough and accurate self- Portfolio contains a limited, brief selfPortfolio does not contain a selfSelfassessment piece that explains what was learned assessment piece that explains what was learned assessment or earned grade for the course. 5 Assessment and what grade should be earned in the course. and may or may not detail what grade should be earned in the course.

Total (40 Pts. Possible)

40

Project Internet Safety Wiki Web 2.0 Screencast Classroom Management Voicethread TPACK Game Interactive Whiteboard Project Learning Theory UDL Wiki and Podcast Blog Practical Teaching Assignment Read-Present-React Activity: Technology Standards Link to Social Bookmarking Site Read-Present-React Activity: Technology Case Studies Digital Story (optional)

Projects that Should be Included in the Portfolio List specific changes made to projects since first submission (State No edits made if the project was not changed) No edits No edits No edits Edited: I rearranged the first sentence to include the link. I also added Dr. Macaulays suggestion. No edits Edited: Included KWL and containers in a flipchart No edits Added a vocabulary worksheet for students to fill out while watching the digital story on the Forces of Motion. I integrated it in the materials and lesson plan (page 7 under Scaffolding Steps/Modeling) No edits

Original Grade Earned 20/20 20/20 20/20 20/20 20/20 19/20 35/35 15/15

Grade You Think You Deserve After Editing 20/20 20/20 20/20 20/20 20/20 20/20 35/35 15/15

10/10

10/10

Updated throughout the semester but there were no edits to the actual link itself. No edits

20/20 10/10

20/20 10/10

No edits

20/0

20/0