Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Initiation
Project Management
2-2
Chapter 2
Delays in one project delays others Inefficient use of resources Bottlenecks in resource availability
2-4
Project Results
30 Percent canceled midstream Over half of completed projects came in up to190 percent over budget Over half of completed projects came in up to 220 percent late
2-5
Challenges
Making sure projects are closely tied to goals and strategy How to handle the growing number of projects? How to make these projects successful?
2-6
2-7
Project selection
2-8
Types of Companies
Companies whose core business is completing projects Companies whose core business is something else Companies looking at projects to do for others Companies looking at projects to do for themselves
2-9
Model Criteria
2-10
Models turn inputs into outputs Managers decide on the values for the inputs and evaluate the outputs The inputs never fully describe the situation The outputs never fully describe the expected results Models are tools Managers are the decision makers
2-11
2-12
Nonnumeric Models
Models that do not return a numeric value for a project to be compared with other projects These are really not models but rather justifications for projects Just because they are not true models does not make them all bad
2-13
Sacred Cow
A project, often suggested by the top management, that has taken on a life of its own A project that is required in order to protect lives or property or to keep the company in operation
Operating Necessity
Competitive Necessity
A project that is required in order to maintain the companys position in the marketplace
2-14
Often, projects to expand a product line are evaluated on how well the new product meshes with the existing product line rather than on overall benefits Projects are subjectively rank ordered based on their perceived benefit to the company
Comparative Benefit
2-15
Numeric Models
Models that return a numeric value for a project that can be easily compared with other projects Two major categories:
Profit/profitability Scoring
2-16
Profit/Profitability Models
Payback period Discounted cash flow (NPV) Internal rate of return (IRR) Profitability index
2-17
Payback Period
The length of time until the original investment has been recouped by the project A shorter payback period is better
2-18
Project Cost Payback Period Annual Cash Flow $100,000 Payback Period 4 $25,000
2-19
Does not consider time value of money More difficult to use when cash flows change over time Less meaningful for longer periods of time (due to time value of money)
2-20
2-21
The discount rate may also be known as a hurdle rate or cutoff rate There will usually be one overall discount rate for the company
2-22
NPV Formula
NPV (project) A0
t 1
1 k
Ft
2-23
NPV Example
$25,000 NPV (project) $100,000 t 1 0.15 0.03 t 1 $1,939
8
2-25
While it is technically possible for a series to have multiple IRRs, this is not a practical issue
2-26
Profitability Index
a k a Benefit cost ratio NPV divided by initial cash investment Ratios greater than 1.0 are good
2-27
Easy to use and understand Based on accounting data and forecasts Familiar and well understood Gives a go/no-go indication Can be modified to include risk
2-28
Ignore nonmonetary factors Some ignore time-value of money Biased toward the short-term Payback ignores cash flow after payback IRR can have multiple solutions All are sensitive to errors Nonlinear Dependent on determination of cash flows
2-29
Scoring Models
Unweighted 01 factor model Unweighted factor model Weighted factor model
2-30
Factors selected
Raters score the project on each factor Each project gets a total score Main advantage is that the model uses multiple criteria Major disadvantages are that it assumes all criteria are of equal importance
2-31
Figure 2-2
2-32
2-33
2-34
A good way to include nonnumeric data in the analysis Factors need to sum to one All weights must be set up, so higher values mean more desirable Small differences in totals are not meaningful
2-35
Figure B Page 60
2-36
Allow multiple criteria Structurally simple Direct reflection of managerial policy Easily altered Allow for more important factors Allow easy sensitivity analysis
2-37
Relative measure Linear in form Can have large number of criteria Unweighted models assume equal importance
2-38
There are many ways of dealing with risk Can make estimates about the probability of outcomes
Uncertainty about:
2-40
More projects Inconsistent determination of benefits Projects that dont contribute to the strategy Competing projects Costs exceed benefits No risk analysis of projects Lack of tracking against the plan No client for project
2-41
Identify nonprojects Prioritize list of projects Limit number of projects Identify the real options for each project Identify projects with good fit Identify co-dependent projects
2-42
Eliminate risky projects Eliminate projects that skip the formal selection process Keep from overloading the organization To balance the resources with needs To balance returns To balance short-, medium-, and longterm returns
2-43
Establish a project council Identify project categories and criteria Collect project data Assess resource availability Reduce the project and criteria set Prioritize the projects within categories Select the projects to be funded and held in reserve Implement the process
2-44
2-45
2-46
2-47
Assess both internal and external resources Assess labor conservatively Timing is particularly important
2-48
Organizations goals Have competence Market for offering How risky the project is Potential partner Right resources Good fit
2-49
Step 6: Prioritize the Projects Within Categories Apply the scores and criterion weights Consider in terms of benefits first and resource costs second Summarize the returns from the projects
2-50
Step 7: Select the Projects to be Funded and Held in Reserve Determine the mix of projects across the categories Leave some resources free for new opportunities Allocate the categorized projects in rank order
2-51
2-52
Project Proposals
The project proposal is essentially a project bid Putting together a project proposal requires a detailed analysis of the project Project proposals can take weeks or months to complete A more detailed analysis may result in not bidding on the project
2-53
2-54