Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OECD/World Bank Third Asian Roundtable on Corporate Governance Singapore 4-5 April 2001 Dr. Stephen Davis
The state is privatizing and de-regulating Ownership is globalUS/UK capital dominates Trade barriers make competition worldwide Media and Internet expose more scandals
DAVIS GLOBAL ADVISORS
Who replaces the state? To whom are corporations or funds accountable? How can companies be best shaped to succeed?
Traditional stakeholder model ill-suited to globalization challenge But traditional shareowner supremacy model fails to meet stakeholder concerns Emerging global paradigm: corporate boards accountable solely to owners, but responsible for successful relations with all stakeholders
Consensus: activism pays (eg McKinsey findings) Mainstream funds adapting to stakeholder agendas: new Myners Code, UK disclosure regulations, CalPERS
Ratings: GMI, S&P starting governance scoring Focus Funds: Spread of funds targeting under-performing,
under-governed companies or tilting toward well-governed
Routine/Electronic Voting: More monitoring, less expense Benchmarks: PSAG pressure on indexers and analysts International AlliancesCalPERS/Hermes, ICGN, GCGN Cross-Pollination of Tactics, Ideaseg OTPP online
Rise of socially-responsible investment industryroutine screening (eg Asria) Individual shareowners: associations wield new clout (eg
Sweden, Australia), plus Internet investors (Allied Owners, Foliofn)
Maverick web media: (webb-site.com, crikey.com) NGOs: environment, religious, human rights and other lobbies now
embracing shareowner activism (eg Bench Marks)
DAVIS GLOBAL ADVISORS
Oil firms a natural target of social activism Traditional defensiveness and secrecy But 1997 human rights resolution at Shell and BPs Columbia troubles prompted overhaul Board saw ethics as competitive advantage Firm took pre-emptive steps, a model (until 2001)
Surprising Success
Loyalty of investors: eg backed Amoco merger Praise from environmental groups: Friends of the Earth Human rights recognition: Amnesty International Citations from stakeholder watchdogs: eg the Prince of
Wales Business Leaders Forum
Easily Squandered
Puzzling U-turn in 2001 with imposition of restrictions on investor rights at April AGM
Alienated shareowners, reducing trust in board and raising exposure risks Undermined credibility of stakeholder outreach Exposed lack of global perspectivea firm cannot seek
global capital but expect to play by only local rules when it wishes
Expect more activism, more scrutiny on social recordPetroChina, Asria screening, monitoring groups Corporates need modern stakeholder engagement toolkit like BP developedbut with sustained, board-level attention to them Cant play only by local conventions with global ownership and marketplace
DAVIS GLOBAL ADVISORS