Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Portfolio Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Table of Contents I. SPSS Assignment #1: Frequency Distribution a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph c. Appendix A II. SPSS Assignment #2: Stem and Leaf Plot a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph c. Appendix A III. SPSS Assignment #3: Multiple Regression Model a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph c. Appendix IV. SPSS Assignment #4: Multiple Regression (Method: Stepwise) a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph #1 c. Explanatory Paragraph #2 d. Figure 1: Conceptual Model e. Table 1: Correlation Matrix f. Table 2: Regression Output Table h. Appendix A 1. Regression Output a. Direct Entry Regression b. Stepwise Regression 2. Correlation Analysis V. SPSS Assignment #5: Multiple Regression (Method: Hierarchical)

a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph #1 (Regression) c. Explanatory Paragraph #2 (Correlation Matrix) d. Figure 1: Conceptual Model e. Table 1: Zero-Order Correlation Matrix f. Table 2: Descriptive Statistics h. Table 3: Regression Output i. Appendix A 1. Regression Output 2. Correlation Analysis VI. SPSS Assignment #6: One-way ANOVA a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph c. Table 1: ANOVA Output d. Appendix VII. SPSS Assignment #7: One-way ANOVA a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph c. Table 1: ANOVA Output d. Appendix VIII. SPSS Assignment #8: Regression Analysis a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph #1 c. Explanatory Paragraph #2 d. Figure 1: Conceptual Model e. Table 1: Correlation Matrix

f. Table 2: Regression Output Table h. Appendix A 1. Regression Output 2. Correlation Analysis IX. SPSS Assignment #9: Regression Analysis a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph #1 c. Explanatory Paragraph #2 d. Figure 1: Conceptual Model e. Table 1: Correlation Matrix f. Table 2: Regression Output Table h. Appendix A 1. Regression Output 2. Correlation Analysis X. SPSS Assignment #10: Chi-square a. Cover Page b. Explanatory Paragraph c. Appendix

SPSS Assignment # 1 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph A frequency distribution analysis was conducted using group status, attachment, situational involvement, enduring involvement, identity salience, satisfaction, and attendance. With respect to the skewness coefficients, situational involvement, satisfaction, attendance were within the acceptable limits. However, the skewness coefficients for attachment, enduring involvement and identity salience were unacceptable.

SPSS Assignment # 2 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph A stem-and-leaf plot analysis was conducted using Group Status, Attachment, Situational Involvement, Enduring Involvement, Identity Salience, Satisfaction, Attendance, and Salary. The stem-and-leaf plot for Identity Salience, Satisfaction, and Attendance were consistent with a normal distribution. However, the stemand-leaf plot for Attachment, situational Involvement, and Enduring Involvement were positively skewed.

SPSS Assignment # 3 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph Y= 42.6 - .301 Attachment - .973 Attendance - .923 Enduring Involvement A regression analysis was conducted with Situational Involvement as the dependent variable and Attachment, Attendance, Enduring Involvement, and Identity Salience as the independent measures. Overall, the regression model was statistically significant (F = 62.499, p= .000). The coefficient of correlation (r) indicated a moderate relationship between the predictors and Situational Involvement (r = .891). A model fit index, the coefficient of determination (R), was .794, indicating that 79.4 percent of the variation in Situational Involvement can be explained by Attachment, Attendance, Enduring Involvement, and Identity Salience. The adjusted R, which considers the number of predictors and the sample size, was .781, which indicated no extraneous predictors were included in the model. Because the standard error of the estimate was 3.188, the prediction equation was performing satisfactorily.

SPSS Assignment # 4 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph Y= 4.777 + .721 Attendance - .130 Enduring Involvement + .171 Attachment - .204 Identity Salience A multiple regression analysis was conducted, using the Stepwise Method, with Satisfaction as the dependent variable and Attendance, Enduring Involvement, Attachment, and Identity Salience as the independent measures. Overall, the regression model was statistically significant (F = 73.69, p= .000). The coefficient of correlation (r) indicated a moderate relationship between the predictors and Satisfaction (r = .905). A model fit index, the coefficient of determination (R), was .819, indicating that 81.9 percent of the variation in Satisfaction can be explained by Attendance, Enduring Involvement, Attachment, and Identity Salience. The adjusted R, which considers the number of predictors and the sample size, was .808, which indicated no extraneous predictors were included in the model. Because the standard error of the estimate was 1.233, the prediction equation was performing satisfactorily.

Explanatory Paragraph A bivariate correlation was conducted using Satisfaction, Attendance, Enduring Involvement, Attachment, and Identity Salience. Using a Pearson Product Moment correlation coefficient with two-tailed significance, the data indicated a significant positive correlation between Attendance, Attachment, and Identity Salience for the overall sample (N = 70), r = .880, p < .000. However Enduring Involvement was not significant with Satisfaction.

Figure 1: A Conceptual Model of Satisfaction Attendance

Enduring Involvement

Satisfaction

Attachment

Identity Salience

Table1: Means, Standard Deviation, and Zero Order Correlation Matrix

Variables 1. Satisfaction 2. Attendance 3. Enduring Involvement 4. Attachment 5. Identity Salience

Means 10.86 10.27 33.34 30.64 10.87

S.D. 2.81 3.13 7.70 9.41 3.79

.880** .149 .602** .645** .226 .665** .807** .806** .493**

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) Table 2: Regression Output Table Regression analysis with Attendance, Enduring Involvement, Attachment, and identity Salience as the independent predictors and Satisfaction as the dependent variable, n=70

Predictor (Constant) Attendance Enduring Involvement Attachment Identity Salience

Beta

SE Coef. .997 .105 .046 .050 .081

t-stat 4.792 6.861 -2.853 3.448 -2.526

p-value .000 .000 .006 .001 .014

.802 -.357 .572 -.274

R-squared Adjusted R S.E. of Regression

.774 .771 1.35

SPSS Assignment # 5 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph Y= 12.786 + .346 Identity Salience + .179 Attachment A multiple regression analysis was conducted, using the Hierarchical Method, with Attendance as the dependent variable and Identity Salience, Attachment, Enduring Involvement, and Situational Involvement as the independent measures. Overall, the regression model was statistically significant (F = 79.34, p= .000). The coefficient of correlation (r) indicated a moderate relationship between the predictors and Situational Involvement (r = .911). A model fit index, the coefficient of determination (R), was .830, indicating that 83 percent of the variation in Situational Involvement can be explained by Attachment, Attendance, Enduring Involvement, and Identity Salience. The adjusted R, which considers the number of predictors and the sample size, was .820, which indicated no extraneous predictors were included in the model. Because the standard error of the estimate was 1.329, the prediction equation was performing satisfactorily.

Explanatory Paragraph A bivariate correlation was conducted using Attendance, Identity Salience, Attachment, Enduring Involvement, and Situational Involvement. Using a Pearson Product Moment Identity Salience correlation coefficient with two-tailed significance, the data indicated a significant positive correlation between Identity Salience and Attachment for the overall sample (N = 70), r = .911, p < .001. However Enduring Involvement and Situational Involvement were not significant with Satisfaction. Attachment

Attendance

Enduring Involvement

Situational Involvement

Figure 1: A Conceptual Model of Attendance

Table1: Zero Order Correlation Matrix

Variables 1. Attendance 2. Identity Salience 3. Attachment 4. Enduring Involvement 5. Situational Involvement -.472**

.807** .665** .226 .784** .493** -.153 .806** .143

.61

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) Table 2: Descriptive Statistics, (n=70)

Variable

Mean

Std. Deviation.

Attendance Identity Salience Attachment Enduring Involvement Situational Involvement

10.27 10.87 30.64 33.34 54.57

3.13 3.79 9.41 7.70 6.81

Table 3: Regression Output Table Regression analysis with Identity Salience, Attachment, Enduring Involvement, and Situational Involvement as the independent predictors and Attendance as the dependent variable, n=70

Predictor (Constant) Identity Salience Attachment Enduring Involvement Situational Involvement

Beta

SE Coef. 1.872 .075 .051 .068 .047

t-stat 6.830 4.622 3.506 -1.126 -3.581

p-value .000 .000 .001 .264 .001

.422 -.538 -.188 -.368

a. R-squared Adjusted R S.E. of Regression .652 .647 1.86

b. .830 .820 1.33

a. Predictors: (Constant), identity salience b. Predictors: (Constant), Identity salience, situational involvement, attachment, enduring involvement

SPSS Assignment # 6 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph A one-way ANOVA was conducted using Culture, Emotion, GPA, and Sesteem as dependent variables. Gender was used as the factor variable. The overall status of the one-way ANOVA was not statistically significant.

Table 1: Result of One-way ANOVA Testing the Categorical Variables, n=86

F-Value (Factors) Culture Scores Emotional Intelligence Scores GPA Sesteem .115 1.349 1.390

P-Value

.736 .249 .242

SPSS Assignment # 7 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph A one-way ANOVA was conducted using Culture Bedrooms, Distance, Price, Size as dependent variables. Pool was used as the factor variable. The overall status of the one-way ANOVA was not statistically significant.

Table 1: Result of One-way ANOVA Testing the Categorical Variables, n=105

Dependent Variables Bedrooms Distance Price Size

F-Value .003 2.041 9.750 4.318

P-Value .957 .156 .002 .040

SPSS Assignment # 8 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph

Y= 1229.34 + 1.96 Value - 22.46 Gender - 13.61 Year 25.38 Income

A regression analysis was conducted with Mortgage Payments as the dependent variable and Value, Gender, Years of Education, and Income as the independent measures. Overall, the regression model was not statistically significant (F = 1.301, p= 3.03). The coefficient of correlation (r) indicated a moderate relationship between the predictors and Mortgage Payments (r = .454). A model fit index, the coefficient of determination (R), was .206, indicating that 20.6 percent of the variation in Mortgage Payments can be explained by Value, Gender, Years of Education, and Income. The adjusted R, which considers the number of predictors and the sample size, was .048, which indicated no extraneous predictors were included in the model. Because the standard error of the estimate was 102.965, the prediction equation was not performing

Explanatory Paragraph

A bivariate correlation was conducted using Mortgage Payment, Value, Gender, Years of Education, and Income. Using a Pearson Product Moment correlation coefficient with two-tailed significance, the data indicated no significant positive correlation for the overall sample (N = 25), r = .454, p >.01.

Figure 1: A Conceptual Model of Mortgage Payments Value

Gender

Mortgage Payment

Years of Education

Income

Table1: Zero Order Correlation Matrix

Variables 1. Mortgage 2. Value 3. Gender 4. Year 5. Income .074

.358 -.129 -.210 .184 -.144 .708** .062 .475* .157

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed) Table 2: Regression Output Table Regression analysis with Value, Gender, Years of Education, and Income as the independent predictors and Mortgage Payments as the dependent variable, n=25

Predictor (Constant) Value Gender Year Income

Beta

SE Coef. 1243.699 1.151 48.950 33.336 37.056

t-stat .988 1.700 -.459 -.408 -.685

p-value .335 .105 .651 .688 .501

.535 -.108 -.089 -.240

R-squared Adjusted R Standard Error

.206 .048 102.965

SPSS Assignment # 9 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph Y= 31.445 + .625 Gender + .318 Year A multiple regression analysis was conducted using Income as the dependent variable and Value, Gender, Years of Education, and Mortgage Payment as the independent measures. Overall, the regression model was statistically significant (F = 10.872, p= .000). The coefficient of correlation (r) indicated a moderate relationship between the predictors and Income (r = .828). A model fit index, the coefficient of determination (R), was .685, indicating that 68.5 percent of the variation in Income can be explained by Value, Gender, Years of Education, and Mortgage Payment . The adjusted R, which considers the number of predictors and the sample size, was .622, which indicated no extraneous predictors were included in the model. Because the standard error of the estimate was .6142, the prediction equation was performing satisfactorily.

Explanatory Paragraph A bivariate correlation was conducted using Income, Value, Gender, Years of Education, and Mortgage Payment. Using a Pearson Product Moment correlation coefficient with two-tailed significance, the data indicated a significant positive correlation between Value for the overall sample (N = 25), r = .828, p < .000. However Gender, Years of Education, and Mortgage Payment were not significant with Satisfaction.

Figure 1: A Conceptual Model of Mortgage Payments Value

Gender

Income

Years of Education

Mortgage Payment

Table1: Zero Order Correlation Matrix

Variables 1. Income 2. Value 3. Gender 4. Year 5. Mortgage .074

.708** .475* 157 .184 -.144 .358 .062 -.129 -.210

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed) Table 2: Regression Output Table Regression analysis with Value, Gender, Years of Education, and Mortgage Payment as the independent predictors and Income as the dependent variable, n=25

Predictor (Constant) Value Gender Year Mortgage Payment

Beta

SE Coef. 2.877 .005 .258 .187 .001

t-stat 10.928 5.137 2.424 1.706 -.685

p-value .000 .000 .025 .103 .501

.716 .317 .220 -.095

R-squared Adjusted R Standard Error

.685 .622 .6142

SPSS Assignment # 10 Isaac Jones BUSA 2182, TR 11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Explanatory Paragraph A Chi-square analysis was conducted using Ruworkin and Gender. The results indicate no significant difference were noted between the expected frequency and the observed frequency.