Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ill-conditioning and singularity problems in finite element analysis why they happen and how to prevent them.
Precise solution
x1 = -1 x2 = 1
Solution is intersection of two lines small perturbation can have significant effect on solution ill conditioned
7
Condition number
Mathematical definition
max ( K ) (K ) min ( K )
Large differences in stiffness are likely to lead to large differences in maximum & minimum eigenvalues
a large condition number indicates a problem if the condition number = 10k, then you require k digits of accuracy
Condition number
If the structure is unconstrained the condition number is infinite
the stiffness matrix is singular
A large condition number may not prevent the solution, but will reduce the reliability of the results A large condition number may be more difficult to isolate that an infinite condition number
10
Analysis failure
11
K
any unconstrained modes will give a zero eigenvalue an overly flexible part of the structure will give a low eigenvalue eigenvectors (mode shapes) will highlight where the problems lie
12
13
14
15
In analysis
Check condition number
16
To meet both of the requirements, wall element is implemented in GSA, i.e. wall element size can be large,
but without compromising integrity of analysis results
18
To the users
To analysis solver
19
20
21
Edge 4
Edge 2
Edge 1
Yellow rectangle: the equivalent beam section that is used to apply drilling moment to wall corner node
Dummy/slave node to
the edge nodes
Summary
Wall element is a large 4 node quad element Its size can be large without losing analysis accuracy Wall element edge results (total forces/moments) are presented by equivalent horizontal and vertical beams Wall elements have drilling stiffness and the accuracy of the predicted drilling stiffness is better than the drilling stiffness available for shell elements
26
27