You are on page 1of 3

ARLINGTON ISD

SPRING 1992

NUMBER OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF INHALANTS USED:

o 1 2-3 4+
, Al l 75.6% L3% L4% 7 .7%
crade 6 *of to
Grad€ 7 76.O% 8.9% a.a% 6.4%
Grade 8 76.5% ,, 40f
'zto 9.1%
Grade 9 72.711 7.5% 8.8% 11 .O%
Grade iO 74.6% 8.7% 8.3% 8,4%
cFade .l 1 75.9% 9.1% 7.6% 7.4%
Grade i2 78.8% 8.7% 7 .1% 5.7%

nl&LE 3: EXPERIMENTAL USE OF ANY ILLICIT DRUG(S):

Nofie l-q Times 3+ Tim€s


Al I 78 .4% 6.4% .15.6%
Gnade 6 *% *Yo
Grade 7 90.7% 3.8% 5.5%
Grade 8 86.5% 4.1% s.4%
Gnade I 78.5% 5.s% 15 .6%
Grade 10 72.8% 7.e/" 20.2%
GPade 1'l 65.7% 7 .7% 22.6%
Gnade 12 64.9% LO% 26.1%

-&EiE 4: AVERAGE NUMBER OF TIM€S ILLICIT SUBSTANCES TTJERE USED:

Past Mohth Lifqttme


All 1.O 4.1
GFade 6
cnade 7 o.3 o.8
Grade g o,7 2.5
Grade g 1.O 4.1
Grade 10 'l .3 rio
Grade 1 I 1.3 5.8
cnade 12 1.5 7.3

leg'E 5: IN THE PAST 30 DAYS, HAVE YOU SMOKED CIGARETTES?

Nq yes
Atl 73.2% 20.8%
Grade 6 +% *%
Grade 7 87.6% 12 .4%
Grade I a2.2% t7 .8%
Grade g 80.6% 15.,4%
Grade lO 75.7% 24.3%
Gnade 1 I 72.8% 27 .2%
Grade l? 71 .6% 28.4%

1€LE 6: ABOUT HO!, MANY OF YOUR CLOSE FRIENDS USE...

ALCOHOL (BEER, b,INE COOLERS, UINE, HARD LIOUOR}?


Neven
Heard of None A Few Some Most Al I
*% 24,2% 23.O% 17.8% 23,2%
*% 11 .3%
fi,*&de 6 '+% !+% *% *%
S*sde 7 o.8y, 49.4% 24.s% 12 .4y" s.5%
&,-sde I *% 3.3%
31.7% 27.9% 18.1% 14.2% 7.9%
fire# I *% 20.4% 24.5% 20.4% 2s.3%
,$Hr{eiC 10.9%
a.8% 14.9% 21,6% '19.8% 27.5% 15.5%
*% 11 .A% 19.7% 15.9% 34.4%
*% 14.5%
LO% 'l.7 ,40/, 17.3% a7.6% 19.3%
ARLINGTON ISD
SPRING 1992

-A3.E B1: PREVALENCE AND R€CENCY OF USE OF SELECTED SUBSTANCES BY GRADE


ALL STUDENTS

EVen Pas t Schoo 1 Not Past Never


Used Month Year Year Used

*%
crade 7 38.4% 13. O% 9.7% 15.7% 61 .6%
crade I 44.O% 19.5% 11.1% 13 .4% 56.O%
Grade I 51.3% 22.2% 11 .9% 17 .1% 48.7%
Gnade 10 57.4% 27.4% 13. 1% 16.9% 42.6%
Gnade 1 1 61.3% 90. 1% 11.8% 19 .4% 38.7%
Grade 12 62.5% 31.4% 11 .2% 2c..3% 37 .5%

Grade 7 49.a% 19 .4% 15.3% 15. 1% 50.2%


Grade I 64.1% 3c-. 1% 18.6% 15.5% 35.9%
Gnade I 71 .2% 35.7% 2c .5% 15.o% 28.8%
Gnade 10 77 .3% 42.9% 13 .4% 22.7%
crade 'l 1 8i.a% 46 .4% 22.5% 12.9% 18.2%
Grade 12 84.A% 51.1% 13.1% 15.2%

Gnade 6 *% *% *%
Grade 7 13.4% 4.9% 4.7% 5.7% a4.6%
Gnade I 17 .O% 5.6% 4.9% 6.4% 83.O%
Grade I 21 .6% 5.A% 6.6% 10. o% 78 .4%
Gnade 10 17 .A% 2.9% 4.8% 10, 1% a2.2%
Gnade 1 1 18 .4% 3.6% 4.9% 10. o% 81 .6%
Gnade 12 16.o% 1.6% 2.7% 11.8% 84.A%

Grade *% *Yc
Grad€ 7 s.7% 3.6% 3.1% 2.9% 90. 3%
Grad6 I 13.5% 3 .1% 3.2% 85 .5%
Grade I 21 .6% 5.3% 6.1% 78.4%
Grade 10 27 .6% 12.4% a a./^ 7.O% 72.4%
Grade 1 1 BA.5% e.8% 63.5%
Grade 12 35.3% 12.1% 10. 3% 12.9% 64.7%

Grade t% *%
crade 7 5.9% 1.8% 2.1Y" s4 .1%
Grade 8 10.7% 4.7% 3.O% 3.O% 89.3%
q 5.7% a3.4%
Gnade I 16.6% s.6% eo/-

Grade 10 23. 1% e. 1% 6.e% 76.5%


Grade 1 1 27.a% 10.3% 7.O% 10. 6%
Gnade 12 32.7% 10.1% 10. o% 67 .3%

Grade *% *Yr
Grade 7 3.2% x% 1.2% 1 .6% 96.8%
Grade 8 3.9% a.6% 1.2% 2.1% 96. 1%
Grade I 6.O% 1.4% 3.5% 94.O%
Gnade 10 L2% 2.4% 3.O% 3.8% eo.8%
Gnade 'l 1 s.9% 1.6% 2.7% 3'b7o 90.1%
Gnade 12 15. 1% 2.8% 4.9% 7 -4y" a4.9%

Grade
Grade 7 1.6% * o/-
o.8% 98.4%
Grade 8 3.5% 1.3% 1 .7% o. 5% 96.5%
1.6% qq 7ol.
Grade I 4.3% 1.5%
crade 10 6.1% 1.3% 2.3% 2.6% 93.9%
Gnade 1 1 6.6% 2.3% 1 .e% 2.5% s3.4%
Grade 12 8.4% 2.3% 2.3% 3.8% s1.6%
ARLlNGTON !SD
SPRING 1992

GENDER

Q1 Fnequency Pencent
Male 3147. 18575 50. 3
Fema'le 3112.13384 49 .7
Fnequency Mlssing = 20.68063718

GRADE

GRAoE Fnequency Percent


7 th 1 259 . 05849 20. o
8th I 1 14.63208 17.7
9th 1123.46757 17 .9
'loth 1058 .90047 16 .9
1 1 th 899. 18185 14.3
12th 824.75976A 13.1

LIVE WlTH BOTH PARENTS

Q3 Fnequency Pencent
Yes 3977.92349 63.6
No 2272.35458 36.4
Frequency Missing = 29.72215772

AGE

04 Fnequency Penc€nt
12 477 .392772 1A
{? 1089. 77786 17 .4
14 1 101 .23033 17.6
{li 1 140. 3SO1 3 18.2
16 977 .660893 15 .6
17 930.22A812 14.9
18 478.755141 7.6
19 or older 68.6872549 1.'t
Fneguency Missing = 15.87701982

ETHNICITY

FFequency Pencent
White 4471.A62 Tl.9
Black 725.132383 11.7
Mexican/American 454.47c,453 7 .s
Other 569.699857 g .z

Fneguoncy Missing - 58.8355232

i..-f.M *r*.cuenc i
es have been weighted so that the analysis ref'lects
**:-[r of students by grade level and campus in the distnict.

You might also like