Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • ORDER RELEASING PROPERTY 11 TR 26800 3 30 12 Nash RMC RJC RPD Wcso King Clark Marked As Recd Back by RMC 4 13 12 Return To Sender Pthoa Hy

    Uploaded by

    NevadaGadfly
    7 views2 pages
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/167626953/10-4-12-Order-Striking-Appeal-in-26800-0204-0434-Nash-Gardner-Elliott-Elcano-Mcgeorge-5104-374 It is interesting to compare the Order by Judge Holmes that she herself had provided to the SBN with what the SBN ultimately decided to utilize at the hearing (FHE4, FHE5, and just the Certificate of Service from her 3/13/12 Order Striking Fugitive Document Filed on March 7, 2012 presented as the last page of FHE9), to what was attached to the Complaint (just FHE5), to what was quoted from FHE4 within the Complaint, to the Complaints lack of incorporating by reference Mirch style the rest of FHE4, (not to mention the rest of FHE2 (well, that was not even hinted at in the Complaint), FHE3, FHE10, FHE7, FHE8, etc., etc). The earlier stamped of the two very similar Orders, Judge Nash Holmes SUA SPONTE ORDER DENYING RELIEF IN IMPROPER DOCUMENT filed on 3/13/12 in 11 TR 26800 reads: “SUA SPONTE ORDERDENYING RELIEF SOUGHT IN IMPROPER DOCUMENT On March 9, 2012, at 12:38 p.m., defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin, an attorney and self-represented litigant in the instant traffic citation case, began fax-filing a 218-page document to the Reno Municipal Court purporting to seek various and sundry types of relief from this court on a "Boulevard Stop" traffic citation matter. He labeled his document "Motion to Return Cell Phones; Motion to Set Aside Summary Contempt Order; and Notice of Appeal of Summary Contempt Order." Said document was filed by the Clerk of the Court, on Monday March 12, 2012, after causing much disruption to the court's operations. The court herein issues this Order sua sponte to prevent the plaintiff, Reno City Attorney,from devoting any additional time.or resources to this document, and to relieve the plaintiff from any burden of attempting to respond to said document. Likewise, the court staff is relieved of any obligation to further deal with this aberrant document. The court finds that the defendant has failed to follow proper legal procedure in preparing and filing his motions and purported Notice of Appeal. The court also finds that Mr. Coughlin has blatantly abused the court's fax-filing process offered for the convenience of parties appearing in this court. As with his previous, mostly incoherent document, this document filed by Mr. Coughlin appears to be a recitation of family grievances, lyrics to rock (page 1) songs, disjointed legal ramblings, citations and argument in another case with another judge in a different department of Reno Municipal Court, and, is, thus, even more irrelevant to the instant case than the 224-page document previously filed by Mr. Coughlin. IT IS ORDERED that any and all relief sought by the defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin in the above-described document is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Zachary Barker Coughlin shall refrain from, and is hereby barred and prohibited from faxing an y documents to Reno Municipal Court. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that if Zachary Barker Coughlin wishes to file documents in Reno Municipal Court on any matter assigned to Department 3, he must present signed originals only, in appropriate legal form and format, limited to no more than 15 pages in length, and before they are filed, the clerk of the court shall present them to this court for review in chambers, and this court will make a pre-filing determination if they can be filed by the clerk. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated this 13th day of March, 2012. /s/ The Hon. Dorothy Nash Holmes, Reno Municipal Judge" Judge Nash Holmes SUA SPONTE ORDER DENYING RELIEF IN IMPROPER DOCUMENT filed on 3/13/12 in 11 TR 26800 reads: "On March 7. 2012, at 1:58 p.m., defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin, an attorney and self represented litigant in the instant traffic citation case, began fax-filing a 224-page document to the Reno Municipal Court purporting to seek various and sundry types of relief from this court on a "Boulevard Stop" traffic citation matter. He label

    Original Title

    ORDER RELEASING PROPERTY 11 TR 26800 3 30 12 Nash Rmc Rjc Rpd Wcso King Clark Marked as Recd Back by Rmc 4 13 12 Return to Sender Pthoa Hy

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/167626953/10-4-12-Order-Striking-Appeal-in-26800-0204-0434-Nash-Gardner-Elliott-Elcano-Mcgeorge-5104-374 It is interesting to compare the Order by Judge Holmes that she herself had provided to the SBN with what the SBN ultimately decided to utilize at the hearing (FHE4, FHE5, and just the Certificate of Service from her 3/13/12 Order Striking Fugitive Document Filed on March 7, 2012 presented as the last page of FHE9), to what was attached to the Complaint (just FHE5), to what was quoted from FHE4 within the Complaint, to the Complaints lack of incorporating by reference Mirch style the rest of FHE4, (not to mention the rest of FHE2 (well, that was not even hinted at in the Complaint), FHE3, FHE10, FHE7, FHE8, etc., etc). The earlier stamped of the two very similar Orders, Judge Nash Holmes SUA SPONTE ORDER DENYING RELIEF IN IMPROPER DOCUMENT filed on 3/13/12 in 11 TR 26800 reads: “SUA SPONTE ORDERDENYING RELIEF SOUGHT IN IMPROPER DOCUMENT On March 9, 2012, at 12:38 p.m., defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin, an attorney and self-represented litigant in the instant traffic citation case, began fax-filing a 218-page document to the Reno Municipal Court purporting to seek various and sundry types of relief from this court on a "Boulevard Stop" traffic citation matter. He labeled his document "Motion to Return Cell Phones; Motion to Set Aside Summary Contempt Order; and Notice of Appeal of Summary Contempt Order." Said document was filed by the Clerk of the Court, on Monday March 12, 2012, after causing much disruption to the court's operations. The court herein issues this Order sua sponte to prevent the plaintiff, Reno City Attorney,from devoting any additional time.or resources to this document, and to relieve the plaintiff from any burden of attempting to respond to said document. Likewise, the court staff is relieved of any obligation to further deal with this aberrant document. The court finds that the defendant has failed to follow proper legal procedure in preparing and filing his motions and purported Notice of Appeal. The court also finds that Mr. Coughlin has blatantly abused the court's fax-filing process offered for the convenience of parties appearing in this court. As with his previous, mostly incoherent document, this document filed by Mr. Coughlin appears to be a recitation of family grievances, lyrics to rock (page 1) songs, disjointed legal ramblings, citations and argument in another case with another judge in a different department of Reno Municipal Court, and, is, thus, even more irrelevant to the instant case than the 224-page document previously filed by Mr. Coughlin. IT IS ORDERED that any and all relief sought by the defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin in the above-described document is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Zachary Barker Coughlin shall refrain from, and is hereby barred and prohibited from faxing an y documents to Reno Municipal Court. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that if Zachary Barker Coughlin wishes to file documents in Reno Municipal Court on any matter assigned to Department 3, he must present signed originals only, in appropriate legal form and format, limited to no more than 15 pages in length, and before they are filed, the clerk of the court shall present them to this court for review in chambers, and this court will make a pre-filing determination if they can be filed by the clerk. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated this 13th day of March, 2012. /s/ The Hon. Dorothy Nash Holmes, Reno Municipal Judge" Judge Nash Holmes SUA SPONTE ORDER DENYING RELIEF IN IMPROPER DOCUMENT filed on 3/13/12 in 11 TR 26800 reads: "On March 7. 2012, at 1:58 p.m., defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin, an attorney and self represented litigant in the instant traffic citation case, began fax-filing a 224-page document to the Reno Municipal Court purporting to seek various and sundry types of relief from this court on a "Boulevard Stop" traffic citation matter. He label

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    ORDER RELEASING PROPERTY 11 TR 26800 3 30 12 Nash RMC RJC RPD Wcso King Clark Marked As Recd Back by RMC 4 13 12 Return To Sender Pthoa Hy

    Uploaded by

    NevadaGadfly
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/167626953/10-4-12-Order-Striking-Appeal-in-26800-0204-0434-Nash-Gardner-Elliott-Elcano-Mcgeorge-5104-374 It is interesting to compare the Order by Judge Holmes that she herself had provided to the SBN with what the SBN ultimately decided to utilize at the hearing (FHE4, FHE5, and just the Certificate of Service from her 3/13/12 Order Striking Fugitive Document Filed on March 7, 2012 presented as the last page of FHE9), to what was attached to the Complaint (just FHE5), to what was quoted from FHE4 within the Complaint, to the Complaints lack of incorporating by reference Mirch style the rest of FHE4, (not to mention the rest of FHE2 (well, that was not even hinted at in the Complaint), FHE3, FHE10, FHE7, FHE8, etc., etc). The earlier stamped of the two very similar Orders, Judge Nash Holmes SUA SPONTE ORDER DENYING RELIEF IN IMPROPER DOCUMENT filed on 3/13/12 in 11 TR 26800 reads: “SUA SPONTE ORDERDENYING RELIEF SOUGHT IN IMPROPER DOCUMENT On March 9, 2012, at 12:38 p.m., defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin, an attorney and self-represented litigant in the instant traffic citation case, began fax-filing a 218-page document to the Reno Municipal Court purporting to seek various and sundry types of relief from this court on a "Boulevard Stop" traffic citation matter. He labeled his document "Motion to Return Cell Phones; Motion to Set Aside Summary Contempt Order; and Notice of Appeal of Summary Contempt Order." Said document was filed by the Clerk of the Court, on Monday March 12, 2012, after causing much disruption to the court's operations. The court herein issues this Order sua sponte to prevent the plaintiff, Reno City Attorney,from devoting any additional time.or resources to this document, and to relieve the plaintiff from any burden of attempting to respond to said document. Likewise, the court staff is relieved of any obligation to further deal with this aberrant document. The court finds that the defendant has failed to follow proper legal procedure in preparing and filing his motions and purported Notice of Appeal. The court also finds that Mr. Coughlin has blatantly abused the court's fax-filing process offered for the convenience of parties appearing in this court. As with his previous, mostly incoherent document, this document filed by Mr. Coughlin appears to be a recitation of family grievances, lyrics to rock (page 1) songs, disjointed legal ramblings, citations and argument in another case with another judge in a different department of Reno Municipal Court, and, is, thus, even more irrelevant to the instant case than the 224-page document previously filed by Mr. Coughlin. IT IS ORDERED that any and all relief sought by the defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin in the above-described document is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Zachary Barker Coughlin shall refrain from, and is hereby barred and prohibited from faxing an y documents to Reno Municipal Court. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that if Zachary Barker Coughlin wishes to file documents in Reno Municipal Court on any matter assigned to Department 3, he must present signed originals only, in appropriate legal form and format, limited to no more than 15 pages in length, and before they are filed, the clerk of the court shall present them to this court for review in chambers, and this court will make a pre-filing determination if they can be filed by the clerk. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated this 13th day of March, 2012. /s/ The Hon. Dorothy Nash Holmes, Reno Municipal Judge" Judge Nash Holmes SUA SPONTE ORDER DENYING RELIEF IN IMPROPER DOCUMENT filed on 3/13/12 in 11 TR 26800 reads: "On March 7. 2012, at 1:58 p.m., defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin, an attorney and self represented litigant in the instant traffic citation case, began fax-filing a 224-page document to the Reno Municipal Court purporting to seek various and sundry types of relief from this court on a "Boulevard Stop" traffic citation matter. He label

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    -

    .....
    .....,. ... "'"'"

    _ ... -
    --
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    RECEIVED
    FILED
    Case o. II TR 26800 21
    APR 13 2012
    I.:; 'W'1'CIPhL COURT
    Dept. 0.3
    Reno Court


    "I ' ... I) "0 10 I I IU .. lid \ .:, , :
    ':;L ,:, .j\.... loCURT
    BY
    IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF RENODEPUTY
    CO TY OF WASHOE STATE OF EV ADA
    8 CITY OF RENO,
    9
    10
    1 1
    12
    13
    14
    Plaintiff,
    ORDER RELEASING PROPERTY
    vs.
    ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLm,
    Defendant.
    ----------------------,
    IT I ORDERED that the" ashoe County Sheriffs Office shall release to the
    Defendant, ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLm, three items taken from him on February 27,
    201 2 at the ashoe County Regional Detention Facility, during his booking for incarceration
    pursuant to impo ition of a 5-day jail sentence for Contempt of Court in the above-entitled
    19 case, to wit: one amsung Cell Phone; one T-Mobile Cell Phone; and one Braun Electric
    20 Razor, as identified in Case umber WC 12-1805 and referred to under Control # C-47951 .
    21
    22
    23
    _4
    25
    6
    28
    Dated this 29
    th
    day of March, 2012.

    Reno Municipal Judge
    "-
    1
    2
    CERTIFICATE OF SER VlCE
    3
    4
    Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of the Reno Municipal Court, Reno,
    5 I Nevada, that I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the above action, and that on this date,
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    served a true and correct copy of the attached document to the following as set forth below:
    Washoe County Detention Facility
    911 Parr Blvd.
    Reno, NY 89512
    Allison Orrnaas
    Deputy City Attorney
    P.O. Box 1900
    Reno, evada 89505
    Za hary Barker Coughlin, Esq.
    1422 E. 9'" Street #2
    Reno, e ada 89512
    Fax; (949) 667-7402
    X By placing said document in a sealed envelope and placed for collecting and mailing by United
    States mail in Reno, evada, postage prepaid following ordinary business practices.
    X Fa imile (FAX)
    X Electronic Mail (E-mail)
    ___ Inner-Office mail following ordinary business practices
    ___ Personal Delivery
    DATED this 30'" day of March, 2012.
    Coon Office Manager

    You might also like