COURSE OUTLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013 Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr.

Page 1 of 9 pages _________________________________

I COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS Session 1 A. IP in General: WHAT IS IP Article 712, Articles 721-724, New Civil Code (Approved June 18, 1949) Understanding Copyright and Related Rights (WIPO) http:// www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.pdf Understanding Industrial Property (WIPO) http://www.wipo.int/ freepublications/en/intproperty/895/wipo_pub_895.pdf Section 4, IP Code ELIDAD C. KHO, doing business under the name and style of KEC COSMETICS LABORATORY, petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, SUMMERVILLE GENERAL MERCHANDISING and COMPANY, and ANG TIAM CRAY, [G.R. No. 115758. March 19, 2002.] JESSIE G. CHING, petitioner, vs. WILLIAM M. SALINAS, SR., ET AL, respondents. [G.R. No. 161295. June 29, 2005] Section 14, Article XII, Sections 10, 13, 15 and 16, Article XIV, Philippine Constitution Section 2, IP Code Rodriguez N F, TODAYS CHALLENGE: PROTECTING COPYRIGHT IN THE INTERNET, 57 Ateneo L J 1117 (2013) B. Copyright: WHAT WORKS ARE PROTECTED; WHAT WORKS ARE NOT Section 172-176, IP Code FRANCISCO G. JOAQUIN, JR., and BJ PRODUCTIONS, INC. vs. HONORABLE FRANKLIN DRILON, GABRIEL ZOSA, WILLIAM ESPOSO, FELIPE MEDINA, JR., and CASEY FRANCISCO, [G.R. No. 108946. January 28, 1999.] FILIPINO SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, INC., vs. BENJAMIN TAN [G.R. No. L-36402. March 16, 1987.]

COURSE OUTLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013 Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr. Page 2 of 9 pages _________________________________

Session 2 A. Copyright: Economic Rights and Moral Rights Berne Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne ) WIPO Copyright Treaty (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/ index.html ) Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS) (http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm ) Rep Act No. 10372 (February 28, 2013) Section 177, IP Code Sections 200-201, IP Code Sections 193-199, IP Code B. Related or Neighboring Rights Rep Act No. 10372 (February 28, 2013) Sections 202-212, IP Code Rome Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/rome ) WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (http://www.wipo.int/ treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.html )

C. Ownership and Transfer of Copyright Section 178-179, IP Code Sections 180-183, IP Code RA 9239 Session 3 A. Limitations on Copyright: Periods of Protection Sections 213-215, IP Code B. Limitations on Copyright: Free and Fair Use Sections 184-190, IP Code

COURSE OUTLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013 Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr. Page 3 of 9 pages _________________________________

Session 4 Infringement

Sections 216-220, IP Code Rep Act No. 10372 (February 28, 2013) A.M. No. 10-3-10-SC. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS CASES Rep Act No. 9239 Rep Act No. 10088 PEARL & DEAN (PHIL.), INCORPORATED, petitioner, vs. SHOEMART, INCORPORATED, and NORTH EDSA MARKETING, INCORPORATED, [G.R. No. 148222. August 15, 2003.] PACITA I. HABANA, ALICIA L. CINCO and JOVITA N. FERNANDO vs. FELICIDAD C. ROBLES and GOODWILL TRADING CO., INC., [G.R. No. 131522. July 19, 1999.] 20TH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, EDUARDO M. BARRETO, RAUL SAGULLO and FORTUNE LEDESMA, [G.R. Nos. L-76649-51. August 19, 1988.] COLUMBIA PICTURES, INC. vs. COURT OF APPEALS, SUNSHINE HOME VIDEO, INC. and DANILO A. PELINDARIO, [G.R. No. 110318. August 28, 1996.] SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (PHILS.), INC. and IFPI (SOUTHEAST ASIA), LTD., vs. HON. JUDGE DOLORES L. ESPANOL, AND SOLID LAGUNA CORPORATION [G.R. No. 156804, March 14, 2005]

Session 5 A. Scope of Application and Institution of Actions Sections 221-224, IP Code Sections 225-226, IP Code B. The Digital Environment: WIPO Treaties Rep Act No. 10372 (February 28, 2013)

COURSE OUTLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013 Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr. Page 4 of 9 pages _________________________________ Rodriguez N F, TODAYS CHALLENGE: PROTECTING COPYRIGHT IN THE INTERNET, 57 Ateneo L J 1117 (2013) SONY CORP. OF AMER. v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC., 464 U.S. 417 (1984) (http://caselaw.lp.ndlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl? court=us&vol=464&invol=417 ) Electronic Frontier Foundation: The Betamax Case (http://w2.eff.org/ legal/cases/betamax/ ) METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC. ET AL. v. GROKSTER, LTD., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, No. 04.480. Argued March 29, 2005.Decided June 27, 2005 (http://www.copyright.gov/docs/mgm/opinion.pdf ) Electronic Frontier Foundation: MGM versus Grokster (http:// w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/ ) Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS) (http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm ) Berne Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne ) Rome Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/rome ) WIPO Copyright Treaty (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/ index.html ) WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (http://www.wipo.int/ treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.html ) Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1988 (http://www.copyright.gov/ legislation/dmca.pdf )

!! TRADEMARKS Session 6 A. What are Trademarks?

Sections 121-122, IP Code Understanding Industrial Property (WIPO) ELIDAD C. KHO, doing business under the name and style of KEC COSMETICS LABORATORY, petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, SUMMERVILLE GENERAL MERCHANDISING and COMPANY, and ANG TIAM CRAY, [G.R. No. 115758. March 19, 2002.]

COURSE OUTLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013 Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr. Page 5 of 9 pages _________________________________

PRIBHDAS J. MIRPURI vs. COURT OF APPEALS, DIRECTOR OF PATENTS and the BARBIZON CORPORATION [G.R. No. 114508. November 19, 1999.] Paris Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/paris )

B. Registrability Section 123, IP Code Strength of Trademarks (http://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/ degrees.html) Abercrombie and Fitch v Hunting World (http://bulk.resource.org/ courts.gov/c/F2/537/537.F2d.4.21.74-2540.html ) ANA L. ANG, petitioner, vs. TORIBIO TEODORO, respondent. [G.R. No. 48226. December 14, 1942.] MASSO HERMANOS, S. A., petitioner, vs. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS, respondent. [G.R. No. L-3952. December 29, 1953.] THE EAST PACIFIC MERCHANDISING CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. THE DIRECTOR OF PATENTS and LUIS P. PELLICER, respondents. G.R. No. L-14377. December 29, 1960.] PHILIPPINE REFINING CO., INC., petitioner, vs. NG SAM and THE DIRECTOR OF PATENTS, respondents. [G.R. No. L-26676. July 30, 1982.] CONVERSE RUBBER CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. UNIVERSAL RUBBER PRODUCTS, INC. and TIBURCIO S. EVALLE, DIRECTOR OF PATENTS, [G.R. No. L-27906. January 8, 1987.] EMERALD GARMENT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, BUREAU OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER and H.D. LEE COMPANY, INC., respondents. [G.R. No. 100098. December 29, 1995.] SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE, S.A. and NESTLE PHILIPPINES, INC., petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and CFC CORPORATION, respondents. [G.R. No. 112012. April 4, 2001.] ARCE SONS AND COMPANY, petitioner, vs. SELECTA BISCUIT COMPANY, INC, ET AL., respondents. [G.R. No. L-14761. January 28, 1961.]; [G.R. No. 17981. January 28, 1961.] ANDRES ROMERO, petitioner, vs. MAIDEN FORM BRASSIERE CO., INC. and THE DIRECTOR OF PATENTS, respondents. [G.R. No. L-18289. March 31, 1964.]

COURSE OUTLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013 Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr. Page 6 of 9 pages _________________________________ CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and NSR RUBBER CORPORATION, respondents. [G.R. No. 120900. July 20, 2000.] Session 7 A. Trademark Rights Conferred Section 145-150, IP Code B. Registration Procedure; Application; Nice Classication; Declaration of Actual Use; Disclaimers; Priority Right Examination and Publication; Opposition; Registration; Cancellation Section 124-144 Post-Registration Procedure Sections 151-154, IP Code

Session 8 A. Infringement, Unfair Competition, etc. Sections 155-170, IP Code A.M. No. 10-3-10-SC. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS CASES LA CHEMISE LACOSTE, S. A., petitioner, vs. HON. OSCAR C. FERNANDEZ, Presiding Judge of Branch XLIX, Regional Trial Court, National Capital Judicial Region, Manila and GOBINDRAM HEMANDAS, respondents. [G.R. Nos. 63796-97. May 21, 1984.] DEL MONTE CORPORATION and PHILIPPINE PACKING CORPORATION, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and SUNSHINE SAUCE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES, respondents. [G.R. No. 78325. January 25, 1990.

COURSE OUTLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013 Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr. Page 7 of 9 pages _________________________________ ASIA BREWERY, INC. petitioner, vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS and SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION, respondents. [G.R. No. 103543. July 5, 1993.] MCDONALDS CORPORATION v. L.C. BIG MAK BURGER, INC., [G.R. No. 143993, August 18, 2004] COCA-COLA BOTTLERS, PHILS., INC. (CCBPI), Naga Plant, petitioner, vs. QUINTIN J. GOMEZ, a.k.a. "KIT" GOMEZ and DANILO E. GALICIA, a.k.a. "DANNY GALICIA", respondents. [G.R. No. 154491. November 14, 2008.] B. Domain Names http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/faq/domains.html

PATENTS Session 9 A. What are Patents? Section 21, 71, IP Code; Rep Act No. 9168; Rep Act No. 9150 B. Understanding Industrial Property (WIPO) Session 10 A. Patentability Section 23, 24, 25 26, 27, 28; B. Rights Conferred Section 28, 29, 30, 71, IP Code C. Registration Procedure

COURSE OUTLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013 Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr. Page 8 of 9 pages _________________________________

Sections 32-54, IP Code D. Cancellation Section 61-65 Session 12 A. Infringement of Patent; Rights and Remedies Sections 67-84 A.M. No. 10-3-10-SC. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS CASES SMITH KLINE BECKMAN CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and TRYCO PHARMA CORPORATION, respondents. LOTHAR SCHUARTZ, et al., petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS (SPECIAL FIFTH DIVISION) and THE BUREAU OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, respondents. KENNETH ROY SAVAGE/K ANGELIN EXPORT TRADING, owned and managed by GEMMA DEMORAL-SAVAGE, petitioners, vs. JUDGE APRONIANO B. TAYPIN, Presiding Judge, RTC-BR. 12, Cebu City, CEBU PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, NATIONAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Region VII, Cebu City, JUANITA NG MENDOZA, MENDCO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ALFREDO SABJON and DANTE SOSMENA, respondents. CRESER PRECISION SYSTEMS, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS AND FLORO INTERNATIONAL CORP., respondents. ANGELITA MANZANO, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, and MELECIA MADOLARIA, as Assignor to NEW UNITED FOUNDRY MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, respondents. Session 13

COURSE OUTLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013 Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr. Page 9 of 9 pages _________________________________

A. Industrial Designs and Utility Models Sections 112-120, IP Code Sections 108-111, IP Code B. Trade Secrets What is a Trade Secret? (http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip_business/ trade_secrets/trade_secrets.htm ) C. ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSMISSION OF RIGHTS Sections 103-107, IP Code