Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sxediasmos Enoseon23
Sxediasmos Enoseon23
NMR
, , ,
. * & **
,
*E. , **. ,
62
(dipoledipole coupling).
, ( , , ..).
.
. : = ((wl-w)/w)
x106, ppm (parts per million)
w
.
Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE). Overhauser ()2
( ) ,
. , spins.
(5.0-5.51) .
NMR 3
(NOESY)4
( 11)5.
-,
.
spins.
spin 6.
: () spin- (spin-lattice relaxation, 1),
() spin-spin (spin-spin
relaxation, 2),
, NMR (line broadening).
1
NMR.
*
NMR
STD, WaterLOGSY
5-10g
19,21
500g
12
250g
3,20
15
NMR
,
( 1 & 1)5.
2.000 NMR
Protein Data Bank7, NMR , 8.
NMR
,
: , / . ,
,
. ,
(screening) .
NMR
N-1H
13
C H3
* STD WaterLOGSY .
.
30kDa NMR probe 5mm 500-l. , NMR 1-10 . M cryoprobes NMR (.. Shigemi
tubes).
,
,
. NMR
.
- (, , ..) 15 / 13C ( 1). 15 13C NMR
(1). - (1-1) - (113
C/15N) NMR 2, 3, 4
- (,
DNA/RNA)
,
. ,
(~1/r6),
,
( 1-1).
,
( ,
, -,
, ,
..).
// , NMR , / .
,
63
INNOVATION
1. NMR . () NOESY ( )
. () 40 c (cyt c) , NOESY5. () NMR
40 . () (cyt c),
.
, (1 & 2 ).
, '
(. 2)9.
NMR ( 2D 1H-1H, 15-1 / 13C-1H) (
ppm)
.
64
.
,
,
NMR.
()
(-, .
3)
( ),
NMR
,
( 3). ,
,
(
3).
-, ,
Kd<10-5 M -.
,
-
Kd10-8. Kd~10-6-10-8
. NMR, , ,
.
.
(koff) ,
(d).
:
()
NMR ( )
() .
, ( /)
( 3A-).
(1-10 0,5 mL ), .
NMR
SARbyNMR: SARbyNMR 10-11
(structure-activity relationship by
nuclear magnetic resonance)
.
SARbyNMR () 15 1H ,
.
, [151
]-HSQC 15
, .
,
-
2. NMR. ()
1-15 HSQC 22 13 9. () 1-15 NMR. .
, R ,
. ,
-
,
(R
) .
,
. -
- (
), [1-1]NOESY . ,
. ,
, -
,
,
.
: SARbyNMR
65
INNOVATION
IC50 15 n11. , 12
1.000 100 300 Da ,
300 ,
NMR
(
cryoprobe) / .
SHAPES: 13 SHAPES
(
300 )
.
(shapes) , -
.
(scaffolds)
14. ( d
mM)
. ,
,
, SHAPES
. (SHAPES
66
hits) . (virtual
screening) (docking simulations)
-
.
: SHAPES 13 ,
.
p38, SHAPES p38.
NMR-SOLVE: H NMR-SOLVE (Structurally
Orientated
Library
Valency
Engineering)15 ,
.
NMRSOLVE
-
( ). NMR-SOLVE
2D/3D
NMR
13C 15 -
.
13C-1
15 1-15 .
NMR-SOLVE
/ .
: NMR-SOLVE
,
. NAD. , s
, NADH1516
.
[1 ,15] [1, 13C]
.
NMR-SOLVE
.
.
NMR -
.
,
.
R
.
NMR
17. ,
NMR
NMR -18.
ABSTRACT
Biomolecular NMR in Discovery and
Design of Bioactive Compounds
Natalia Tsami, Athanassios Papakyriakou,
Athanassios Galanis, Georgios .
Spyroulias & Paul Kordopatis
Department of Pharmacy, University of
Patras, GR-26500
NMR Spectroscopy has been proved a
powerful tool for studying the structure
of molecules in solution and the
determination of their threedimensional structure. It has also been
a valuable technique to monitor
dynamics of molecules in solutions and
interactions between biomac romolecules and various ligands. A
major advantage of biomolecular NMR
spectroscopy in drug discovery and
design is its ability to detect ligand
Kd=Ko/Kon=[] []/[
Kon
Ko
A
A
3. NMR . ()
(), NMR .
Kd: - , Kon: - , []: , NOE: nuclear Overhauser effect, []: .
1. Bloch F, Nuclear induction., Phys. Rev. 70, 460-474
(1946).
2. Neuhaus D & Williamson MP, The Nuclear Overhauser
Effect in Structural and Conformational Analysis, (WileyVCH, New York, 2000).
3. Wthrich K, NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids (Wiley,
New York, 1986).
4. Kumar A, Ernst, RR & Wthrich K, A two-dimensional
nuclear Overhauser enhancement (2D NOE) experiment
for the elucidation of complete proton-proton cross-relaxation networks in biological macromolecules, Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 95, 1-6 (1980).
5. Banci L, Bertini I, et al., Solution Structure of reduced
horse heart cytochrome c, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 4, 21-31
(1999).
6. Abragam A, Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Oxford
Univ. Press, New York, 1961).
7. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235-242
(2000).
8. Structural genomics. Nature Struct. Biol. 7 (Suppl.)
(2000).
9. Rizos AK, Tsikalas I, et al., Characterization of a V3 peptide representing the interaction interface of the HIV-1
coat glycoprotein gp120 and the amino terminal of the
chemokine receptor CCR5 in aqueous solutions by Dynamic Light Scattering, J. Non-Cryst. Solid. 352, 44514458, (2006).
10. Shuker SB, Hajduk PJ, et al. Discovering high-affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR, Science 274, 15311534 (1996).
11. Hajduk PJ, et al., Discovery of potent non-peptide inhibitors of stromelysin using SAR by NMR, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 119, 5818-5827 (1997).
12. Hajduk PJ, et al., High-throughput nuclear magnetic resonance-based screening, J. Med. Chem. 42, 23152317 (1999).
13. Fejzo J, et al., The SHAPES strategy: an NMR-based
approach for lead generation in drug discovery, Chem.
Biol. 6, 755-769 (1999).
14. Bemis GW & Murcko MA, The properties of known
drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks, J Med. Chem. 39, 28872893 (1996).
15. Pellecchia M, et al. NMR-based structural characterization of large protein-ligand interactions, J. Biomol.
NMR 22, 165-173 (2002).
16. Jahnke W et al., Second-site NMR screening with a
spin-labeled first ligand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 73947395 (2000).
17. Meinecke R & Meyer B, Determination of the binding specificity of an integral membrane protein by saturation transfer difference NMR: RGD peptide ligands
binding to integrin IIb3, J. Med. Chem. 44, 3059-3065
(2001).
18. Serber Z, Ledwidge R, et al., Evaluation of parameters critical to observing proteins inside living Escherichia
coli by in-cell NMR spectroscopy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123,
8895-8901 (2001).
19. Mayer M & Meyer B, Characterization of ligand binding by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy,
Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 38, 1784-1788 (1999).
20. Hajduk PJ, et al., NMR-based screening of proteins
containing 13C-labeled methyl groups, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
122, 7898-7904 (2000).
21. Dalvit C, et al., Identification of compounds with
binding affinity to proteins via magnetization transfer
from bulk water, J. Biomol. NMR 18, 65-68 (2000).
67