Professional Documents
Culture Documents
07 PDF
07 PDF
Steady-state field problems - heat conduction, electric and magnetic potential, fluid flow, etc.
7.1 Introduction
While, in detail, most of the previous chapters dealt with problems of an elastic continuum the general procedures can be applied to a variety of physical problems. Indeed, some such possibilities have been indicated in Chapter 3 and here more detailed attention will be given to a particular but wide class of such situations. Primarily we shall deal with situations governed by the general quasi-harmonic equation, the particular cases of which are the well-known Laplace and Poisson equations.lP6 The range of physical problems falling into this category is large. To list but a few frequently encountered in engineering practice we have: Heat conduction Seepage through porous media Irrotational flow of ideal fluids Distribution of electrical (or magnetic) potential Torsion of prismatic shafts Bending of prismatic beams, Lubrication of pad bearings, etc. The formulation developed in this chapter is equally applicable to all, and hence little reference will be made to the actual physical quantities. Isotropic or anisotropic regions can be treated with equal ease. Two-dimensional problems are discussed in the first part of the chapter. A generalization to three dimensions follows. It will be observed that the same, Co, shape functions as those used previously in two- or three-dimensional formulations of elasticity problems will again be encountered. The main difference will be that now only one unknown scalar quantity (the unknown function) is associated with each point in space. Previously, several unknown quantities, represented by the displacement vector, were sought. In Chapter 3 we indicated both the weak form and a variational principle applicable to the Poisson and Laplace equations (see Secs 3.2 and 3.8.1). In the following sections we shall apply these approaches to a general, quasi-harmonic equation and indicate the ranges of applicability of a single, unsed, approach by which one computer program can solve a large variety of physical problems.
If the rate at which the relevant quantity is generated (or removed) per unit volume is Q, then for steady-state flow the balance or continuity requirement gives
(7.3)
VTq+Q=O
(7.4)
Generally the rates of flow will be related to gradients of some potential quantity 4. This may be temperature in the case of heat flow, etc. A very general linear relationship will be of the form
q={+
-k<
where k is a three by three matrix. This is generally of a symmetric form due to energy arguments and is variously referred to as Fouriers, Ficks, or Darcys law depending on the physical problem. The final governing equation for the potential is obtained by substitution of Eq. (7.5) into (7.4), leading to
-VkV4+ Q = 0
(7.6)
which has to be solved in the domain R. On the boundaries of such a domain we shall usually encounter one or other of the following conditions:
1. On I'4, q5=$
(7.7a)
i.e., the potential is specified. 2. On rpthe normal component of flow, qn, is given as 4n=q+aq5 where a is a transfer or radiation coefficient. As
4n = Q
T
(7.7b)
"
n = [n,,n,,nzl
where n is a vector of direction cosines of the normal to the surface, this condition can immediately be rewritten as
(kVg5)Tn q
+ + aq5 = 0
(7.7c)
f,
and the governing equation (7.6) can be written (now dropping the prime)
with a suitable change of boundary conditions. Lastly, for an isotropic material we can write
k = kI
(7.10)
where I is an identity matrix. This leads to the simple form of Eq. (3.10) which was discussed in Chapter 3.
sn
v(-VTkV4+Q)dR+
v[(kV4)Tn+q+a4]d r = O
J-rq
(7.11)
for all functions w which are zero on I'd. Integration by parts (see Appendix G) will result in the following weak statement which is equivalent to satisfying the governing equations and the natural boundary conditions (7.7b): (Vv)TkVc$dR +
v(a4 + 4 ) d r
=0
(7.12)
gives on minimization [subject to the constraint of Eq. (7.7a)l the satisfaction of the original problem set in Eqs (7.6) and (7.7). The algebraic manipulations required to verify the above principle follow precisely the lines of Sec. 3.8 of Chapter 3 and can be carried out as an exercise.
4=
Niai = Na
(7. 4)
using either the weak formulation of Eq. (7.12) or the variational statement of Eq. (7.13). If, in the first, we take
v=
Wi 6ai
with
Wi = Nj
(7.15)
according to the Galerkin principle, an identical form will arise with that obtained from the minimization of the variational principle. Substituting Eq. (7.15) into (7.12) we have a typical statement giving
(J o ( V N j ) ' L V N dR +
Jrq
N 1a N d r a + I N , Q d o + Jr,N,YdT = O
i = I, ...,n
(7.16) (7.17)
with
( V N i ) T k V N jdR
+ NiaN, d r A = n NiQ dR + jrq Niq d r on which prescribed values of 4 have to be imposed on boundaries F4.
We note now that an additional stiffnessis contributed on boundaries for which a radiation constant Q is specified but that otherwise a complete analogy with the elastic structural problem exists. Indeed in a computer program the same standard operations will be followed even including an evaluation of quantities analogous to the stresses. These, obviously, are the fluxes q -k V q 5 = - ( k VN)a (7.18) and, as with stresses, the best recovery procedure is discussed in Chapter 14.
, .
Fig. 7.1 Anisotropic material. Local coordinates coincide with the principal directions of stratification.
145
With respect to such axes only three coefficients k,, k y , and k, need be specified, and now only a multiplication by a diagonal matrix is needed in formulating the coefficients of the matrix H [Eq. (7.17)]. It is important to note that as the parameters a correspond to scalar values, no transformation of matrices computed in local coordinates is necessary before assembly of the global matrices. Thus, in many computer programs only a diagonal specification of the k matrix is used.
(7.20)
On discretization by Eq. (7.16) a slightly simplified form of the matrices will now be found. Dropping the terms with c x and ij we can write (7.21)
No further discussion at this point appears necessary. However, it may be worthwhile to particularize here to the simplest yet still useful triangular element (Fig. 7.2). With
N . = aj
+ bjx + cjy
2A
as in Eq. (4.8) of Chapter 4, we can write down the element 'stiffness' matrix as
He = 4A &
bjbj bib;
bib,
+$
cjcj
cjcj
cic,
(7.22)
The load matrices follow a similar simple pattern and thus, for instance, the reader can show that due to Q we have (7.23) a very simple (almost 'obvious') result.
Alternatively the formulation may be specialized to cylindrical coordinates and used for the solution of axisymmetric situations by introducing the gradient
v=
- -
a d T dr 7 a z ]
(7.24)
kr k 0z ] {
g)
84
dZ
(7.25)
the discretization of Eq. (7.16) is now performed with the volume element expressed by d o = 27rrdrdz and integration carried out as described in Chapter 5, Section 5.2.5.
147
Obviously the solutions obtained by the two methods will be identical, and so also will be the orders of approximati0n.t If an irregular mesh based on a square arrangement of nodes is used a difference between the two aproaches will be evident [Fig. 7.3(b)]. This is confined to the load vector f. The assembled equations will show loads which differ by small amounts from node to node, but the sum of which is still the same as that due to the finite difference expressions. The solutions therefore differ only locally and will represent the same averages. In Fig. 7.4 a test comparing the results obtained on an irregular mesh with a relaxation solution of the lowest order finite difference approximation is shown. Both give results of similar accuracy, as indeed would be anticipated. However, it can be shown that in one-dimensional problems the finite element algorithm gives exact answers of nodes, while the finite difference method generally does not. In general, therefore, superior accuracy is available with the finite element discretization. Further advantages of the finite element process are:
1. It can deal simply with non-homogeneous and anisotropic situations (particularly when the direction of anisotropy is variable). 2. The elements can be graded in shape and size to follow arbitrary boundaries and to allow for regions of rapid variation of the function sought, thus controlling the errors in a most efficient way (viz. Chapters 14 and 15). 3. Specified gradient or radiation boundary conditions are introduced naturally and with a better accuracy than in standard finite difference procedures.
t This is only true in the case where the boundary values 6are prescribed.
Fig. 7.4 Torsion of a rectangular shaft. Numbers in parenthesesshow a more accurate solution due to Southwell using a 12 x 16 mesh (values of 4/GOL2).
4. Higher order elements can be readily used to improve accuracy without complicating boundary conditions - a difficulty always arising with finite difference approximations of a higher order. 5. Finally, but of considerable importance in the computer age, standard programs may be used for assembly and solution.
Two more realistic examples are given at this stage to illustrate the accuracy attainable in practice. The first is the problem of pure torsion of a non-homogeneous shaft illustrated in Fig. 7.5. The basic differential equation here is
+-) d 1 df#l
ax G ax
+E(lilO) +2/3=O ay G a y
(7.26)
149
in which q5 is the stress function, G is the shear modulus, and 0 the angle of twist per unit length of the shaft. In the finite element solution presented, the hollow section was represented by a material for which G has a value of the order of lop3 compared with the other materiakt The results compare well with the contours derived from an accurate finite difference solution.8 An example concerning flow through an anisotropic porous foundation is shown in Fig. 7.6. Here the governing equation is (7.27) in which H is the hydraulic head and k, and ky represent the permeability coefficients in the direction of the (inclined) principal axes. The answers are here compared against contours derived by an exact solution. The possibilities of the use of a graded size of subdivision are evident in this example.
3 0 c
L i
8
II x
c ._ 9
0 l
zl c
U ru
0 ._ c
W X
5 ._
3
K
._ m L
Q ru
5 c
VI ._
W ._
5
c 0
Q ._ c
W
Q W
5
L
E
.+
ru c W
a c ,
Q
0 ._ c u (0 c 3
' t
u W .' c c
c m
ru
c ._ ru
i z
W ._
0 .
._
c U .c
a c ,
rn
73 c 3 0 LL
e i .LL
Fig. 7.7 Flow under a dam through a highly non-homogeneous and contorted foundation.
Vp
=0
On moving (or stationary) boundaries the boundary condition is of type 2 [see Eq. (7.7b)l and is given by
--
a~ an
-pan
(7.28)
in which pis the density of the fluid and a, is the normal component of acceleration of the boundary. On free surfaces the boundary condition is (if surface waves are ignored) simply
p=o
(7.29)
The problem clearly therefore comes into the category of those discussed in this chapter. As an example, let us consider the case of a vertical wall in a reservoir, shown in Fig. 7.9, and determine the pressure distribution at points along the surface of the wall and at the bottom of the reservoir for any prescribed motion of the boundary points 1 to 7. The division of the region into elements (42 in number) is shown. Here elements of rectangular shape are used (see Sect 3.3) and combined with quadrilaterals composed
Fig. 7.8 Temperature distribution in steady-state conduction for an axisymmetrical pressure vessel.
153
of two triangles near the sloping boundary. The pressure distribution on the wall and the bottom of the reservoir for a constant acceleration of the wall is shown in Fig. 7.10. The results for the pressures on the wall agree to within 1 per cent with the wellknown, exact solution derived by Westergaard." For the wall hinged at the base and oscillating around this point with the top (point 1) accelerating by ao, the pressure distribution obtained is also plotted in Fig. 7.10. In the study of vibration problems the interaction of the fluid pressure with structural accelerations may be determined using Eq. (7.28) and the formulation given above. This and related problems will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 19. In Fig. 7.11 the solution of a similar problem in three dimensions is shown.4 Here simple tetrahedral elements combined as bricks as described in Chapter 6 were used and very good accuracy obtained. In many practical problems the computation of such simplified 'added' masses is sufficient, and the process described here has become widely used in this context . I ] - I 3
The magnetic problem is of particular interest as its formulation usually involves the introduction of a vector potential with three components which leads to a formulation different from those discussed in this chapter. It is, therefore, worthwhile introducing a variant which allows the standard programs of this section to be utilized for this problem.'8-20
155
Fig. 7.1 2 A three-dimensional distribution of electrostatic potential around a porcelain insulator in an earthed trough4.
In electromagnetic theory for steady-state fields the problem is governed by Maxwells equations which are VxH=-J B=pH VTB = 0 with the boundary condition specified at an infinite distance from the disturbance, requiring H and B to tend to zero there. In the above J is a prescribed electric current density confined to conductors, H and B are vector quantities with three components denoting the magnetic field strength and flux density respectively, p is the magnetic permeability which varies (in an absolute set of units) from unity in vacuo to several thousand in magnetizing materials and x denotes the vector product, defined in Appendix F. (7.30)
The formulation presented here depends on the fact that it is a relatively simple matter to determine the field H, which exactly solves Eq. (7.30) when p = 1 everywhere. This is given at any point defined by a vector coordinate r by an integral:
H -1
s-4nsO
J x (r - r) (r-r)T(r-r)
dR
(7.31)
In the above, r refers to the coordinates of dR and obviously the integration domain only involves the electric conductors where J # 0. With H, known we can write
H
= H,
+ H,
B = PW.? + H m )
VTB = 0
(7.32)
= V#
(7.33)
we find the first of Eqs (7.36) to be automatically satisfied and, on eliminating B in the other two, the governing equation becomes
VTpVd VTpH, = 0
(7.34)
with 4 --+ 0 at infinity. This is precisely of the standard form discussed in this chapter [Eq. (7.6)] with the second term, which is now specified, replacing Q . An apparent difficulty exists, however, if p varies in a discontinuous manner, as indeed we would expect it to do on the interfaces of two materials. Here the term Q is now undefined and, in the standard discretization of Eq. (7.16) or (7.17), the term
NiQ d o E apparently has no meaning. Integration by parts comes once again to the rescue and we note that
(7.35)
(7.36)
As in regions of constant p, VTH, 0, the only contribution to the forcing terms comes as a line integral of the second term at discontinuity interfaces. Introduction of the scalar potential makes both two- and three-dimensional magnetostatic problems solvable by a standard program used for all the problems in this section. Figure 7.14 shows a typical three-dimensional solution for a transformer. Here isoparametric quadratic brick elements of the type which will be described in Chapter 8 were used." In typical magnetostatic problems a high non-linearity exists with
p = p(IH1)
where
I H I
dH:
+ H; + H,'
(7.37)
The treatment of such non-linearities will be discussed in Volume 2. Considerable economy in this and other problems of infinite extent can be achieved by the use of injinite elements to be discussed in Chapter 9.
ax
+$/z'%)
=6pVZ ah
(7.38)
where h is the film thickness, p the pressure developed, p the viscosity and V the velocity of the pad in the x-direction. Figure 7.15 shows the pressure distribution in the typical case of a stepped pad.*' The boundary condition is simply that of zero pressure and it is of interest to note that
Fig. 7.14 Three-dimensional transformer. (a) Field strength H. (b) Scalar potential on plane z = 4.0cm.
the step causes an equivalent of a line load on integration by parts of the right-hand side of Eq. (7.38), just as in the case of magnetic discontinuity mentioned above. More general cases of lubrication problems, including vertical pad movements (squeeze films) and compressibility, can obviously be dealt with, and much work has been done here.22-29
159
w =---=0
du '-ay
dv
ax
etc.
(7.39)
where u and v are appropriate velocity components. This implies the existence of a velocity potential, giving
u=--
84
dX
=
v=-- 84
dY
(7.40)
(or u
-V4)
If, further, the flow is incompressible the continuity equation [see Eq. (7.2)] has to be satisfied, i.e.,
VTU
=0
(7.41)
and therefore
VTV+=Q
(7.42)
Alternatively, for two-dimensional flow a stream function may be introduced defining the velocities as
u=--
alC,
dY
2,=-
alC,
dX
(7.43)
and this identically satisfies the continuity equation. The irrotationality condition must now ensure that
VTVIC,=Q
(7.44)
and thus problems of ideal fluid flow can be posed in one form or the other. As the standard formulation is again applicable, there is little more that needs to be added, and for examples the reader can well consult the literature cited. We shall also discuss further such examples in Volume 3 . The similarity with problems of seepage flow, which has already been discussed, is obvious.37)38 A particular class of fluid flow deserves mention. This is the case when a free surface limits the extent of the flow and this surface is not known a priori. The class of problem is typified by two examples - that of a freely overflowing jet [Fig. 7.16(a)]and that of flow through an earth dam [Fig. 7.16(b)].In both, the free surface represents a streamline and in both the position of the free surface is unknown apriori but has to be determined so that an additional condition on this surface is satisfied. For instance, in the second problem, if formulated in terms of the potential H , Eq. (7.27) governs the problem.
Fig. 7.16 Typical free surface problems with a streamline also satisfying an additional condition of pressure = 0. (a) Jet overflow. (b) Seepage through an earth dam.
References
161
to be satisfied there. In addition, however, the pressure must be zero on the surface as this is exposed to atmosphere. As
H = -P +y
(7.46)
where y is the fluid specific weight, p is the fluid pressure, and y the elevation above some (horizontal) datum, we must have on the surface
H=y
(7.47)
The solution may be approached iteratively. Starting with a prescribed free surface streamline the standard problem is solved. A check is carried out to see if Eq. (7.47) is satisfied and, if not, an adjustment of the surface is carried out to make the new y equal to the H just found. A few iterations of this kind show that convergence is reasonably rapid. Taylor and Brown39 show such a process. Alternative methods including special variational principles for dealing with this problem have been devised over the years and interested readers can consult references 40-48.
References
1. O.C. Zienkiewicz and Y.K. Cheung. Finite elements in the solution of field problems. The Engineer. 507-10, Sept. 1965. 2. W. Visser. A finite element method for the determination of non-stationary temperature distribution and thermal deformations. Proc. Con6 on Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics. Air Force Inst. Tech., Wright-Patterson A F Base, Ohio, 1965. 3. O.C. Zienkiewicz, P. Mayer, and Y.K. Cheung. Solution of anisotropic seepage problems by finite elements. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 92, EMl, 111-20, 1966. 4. O.C. Zienkiewicz, P.L. Arlett, and A.L. Bahrani. Solution of three-dimensional field problems by the finite element method. The Engineer. 27 October 1967. 5. L.R. Herrmann. Elastic torsion analysis of irregular shapes. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 91, EM6, 11-19, 1965. 6. A.M. Winslow. Numerical solution of the quasi-linear Poisson equation in a non-uniform triangle mesh. J. Comp. Phys. 1, 149-72, 1966. 7. D.N. de G. Allen. Relaxation Methods. p. 199, McGraw-Hill, 1955.
References 163
32. J.H. Argyris, G. Mareczek, and D.W. Scharpf. Two and three dimensional flow using finite elements. J. Roy. Aero. SOC. 73, 961-4, 1969. 33. L.J. Doctors. An application of finite element technique to boundary value problems of potential flow. Int. J. Nurn. Meth. Eng. 2, 243-52, 1970. 34. G. de Vries and D.H. Norrie. The application of the finite element technique to potential flow problems. J. Appl. Mech., Am. SOC. Mech. Eng. 38, 978-802, 1971. 35. S.T.K. Chan, B.E. Larock, and L.R. Herrmann. Free surface ideal fluid flows by finite elements. Proc. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 99, HY6, 1973. 36. B.E. Larock. Jets from two dimensional symmetric nozzles of arbitrary shape. J . Fluid Mech. 37, 479-83, 1969. 37. C.S. Desai. Finite element methods for flow in porous media, in Finite Elements in Fluids (ed. R.H. Gallagher). Vol. 1, pp. 157-82, Wiley, 1975. 38. I. Javandel and P.A. Witherspoon. Applications of the finite element method to transient flow in porous media. Trans. SOC. Petrol. Eng. 243, 241-51, 1968. 39. R.L. Taylor and C.B. Brown. Darcy flow solutions with a free surface. Proc. Am. SOC.Civ. Eng. 93, HY2, 25-33, 1967. 40. J.C. Luke. A variational principle for a fluid with a free surface. J . Fluid Mech. 27, 395-7, 1957. 41. K. Washizu, Variational Methods in Elasticity and Plasticity. 2nd ed., Pergamon Press, 1975. 42. J.C. Bruch. A survey of free-boundary value problems in the theory of fluid flow through porous media. Advances in Water Resources. 3, 65-80, 1980. 43. C. Baiocchi, V. Comincioli, and V. Maione. Unconfined flow through porous media. Meccanice. Ital. Ass. Theor. Appl. Mech. 10, 51-60, 1975. 44. J.M. Sloss and J.C. Bruch. Free surface seepage problem. Proc. ASCE. 108, EM5, 10991111, 1978. 45. N. Kikuchi. Seepage flow problems by variational inequalities. Int. J . Nurn. Anal. Meth. geomech. 1, 283-90, 1977. 46. C.S. Desai. Finite element residual schemes for unconfined flow. Znt. J. Nurn. Meth. Eng. 10, 1415-18, 1976. 47. C.S. Desai and G.C. Li. A residual flow procedure and application for free surface, and porous media. Advances in Water Resources. 6, 27-40, 1983. 48. K.J. Bathe and M. Koshgoftar. Finite elements from surface seepage analysis without mesh iteration. Int. J . Nurn. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 3, 13-22, 1979.