You are on page 1of 63

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Tata Sons Limited:


Firm Characteristics expressed under Competition
Amar K.J.R Nayak1

Abstract
The mainstream literature on strategy relating to firm performance is heavily oriented towards the managerial competence and the way they make use of the internal resources and capacities. While normal growth could be explained through the literature of strategy and performance using the two factors viz., the environmental deterministic approach and the employed managerial talent of the firms, the explosive growth of firms in India and other developing countries does not appear to fit the explanation. This compels us to examine if the approach of large firms have been positivist and that they extensively influence and shape the larger environment including policies, regulation, and socio-cultural behaviour of people. Further, it is important to examine the significant role of other external actor-network of large owners/proprietors of the firms with reference to the explosive growth of firms in India during the last about two decades. The case of Tata Sons raises some important theoretical question on the basis of firm growth and especially the explosive growth of relatively large business houses in the fast changing regulatory and institutionally deficient but large developing countries.

1 Amar K.J.R.Nayak, Ph.D., Strategic Management, Xavier Institute of Management, Bhubaneswar.

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Tata Sons Limited


Firm Characteristics expressed under Competition
The Tata way of doing business has remained to be the role model of doing business for many in India and outside India. The Tatas have been reported to be one of the most respectable business houses in the world. John Canning in his book 100 Great Modern Lives had observed the same sentiment long before in the following words. Probably no other family has ever contributed as much in the way of wise guidance, economic development and advancing philanthropy, to any country as the Tatas have to India, both before and since Independence The story of the Tatas and their business endeavours goes back to Jamshetji Nusserwanji, who about 140 years back started a private trading firm in 1868 that laid the foundation of todays Tata Group of companies. Set up in 1917-18, Tata Sons Limited after 72 years of operation, in 1990 had a total income of INR 98.35 crores, and profit after tax of INR 8.92 crores with total net asset of INR 84.92 crores only. Its income consisted of commission, dividends and interest, income from services, rents and other incomes1. Tata Sons has been the owner of the Tata name and the Tata trademark, which are registered in India and several other countries. Apart from lending its brand name to group companies as per the Brand Equity and Business Promotion Agreement, Tata Sons activities has been to; to maintain shareholding in main operating companies, to invest in operating companies to facilitate growth, and to promote the group's entry into new businesses.2

Following the liberalization process in India begun by Rajiv Gandhi in 1985 and then with the watershed of liberalization in 1991, the company has had an explosive growth. In about the last 18 years, Tata Sons has increased its income from INR 98.35 crores to INR 4476.67 crores. It increased its profit after tax from INR 8.92 crores to INR 3379.80 crores. During the same period, Tata Sons increased its assets from INR 84.92 crores to
1 2

Tata Sons Limited, 72nd Annual Report, 1990. http://www.tata.com/company/profile.aspx?sectid=DpOT+Lbrdvg= <accessed May 9, 2009>

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

INR 27093.49 crores3. See Exhibit 1 for growth of Tata Sons on key financial indicators4 for the period 1991-2008.

While the power of control of the Tata family through the two Managing Agents viz., Tata Sons and Tata Industries were clipped by the Government of India on April 2, 1970; the house of the Tatas, have bounced back during the last 18 years of liberalization in India to emerge as the leading business conglomerate of India. In 2008, Tata Sons Limited along with Tata Industries, have financial holdings in 114 companies (see Exhibit 2), whose operation spans across the world. Tata Sons Limited has not only intensified its growth machine in India but has also expanded deeply to countries and markets outside India, both in the industrially advanced countries and the developing countries.

Comparative financial position on sales, PAT and total Assets of most of the Tata Sons companies during the period 1990 to 2008 have shown remarkable growth. The financial trends of 78 companies for three years viz., 1990, 2000, and 2008 are shown in Exhibit 3. Individual companies where the Tata Sons have high stakes and strategic interest have been performing superbly in the last about 20 years. The case of Tata Steel is a point in case. Established in 1907, Tata Iron and Steel Company (Tata Steel) in 1931 had a profit of only INR 0.19 crores and with total assets of INR 23.41 crores. After 50 years, in 1981, it had a profit of a 26.46 crores and assets of INR 550.48 crores. Ten years down the line in 1991, that is after 85 years of operations, the company had a profit of INR 160.13 crores and assets of INR 2703.29 crores. Within the last 18 years, however, with the onslaught of industrial and economic liberalization, Tata Steel has soared high with a profit reaching INR 4687.03 crores and enhancing its asset base to INR 20,746.57 crores. For details on growth in financial indicators of Tata Steel for the period 1931-2008, see Exhibit 4. Many of its holding companies like TCS have surged in their performance in the last about 10 years. The financial figures of sales, assets, PAT, PBDIT, investments, investment abroad, foreign exchange earned, number of shares, and market capitalization
3 4

Tata Sons Limited, Annual Report, 2008 Please note that CMIE data may slightly vary from the data in the Company Annual Reports because of data standardization / normalization followed by CMIE.

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

of the 13 large companies of Tata Sons for the period 1991-2008 are provided in Exhibit 5 -14.

It is quite mesmerizing to observe the performance of Tata Sons in the last 18 years. What did the company do to achieve tremendous growth in a period of liberalization, market uncertainties, imperfections in the intermediate markets and the regulatory framework, and a poor image of Indian companies in foreign markets? How has the focus of the Tata Sons and their Trusts changed over the years? How did the company leverage the brand of the Tatas, goodwill created by the Tata Trusts and their social contribution, bureaucrats-regulators-policy makers-legislators-business leaders network for achieving growth? How was the house of the Tata companies reorganized and disciplined to achieve the performance? Did the company have to breach the trust on its Trusts to achieve some of its growth and profit objectives? How much did the stiff competition in the industry and economy shape its methods, processes and style of management?

Trusts and Development activities of the Tatas


The Tatas have set up several trusts in India. In their philanthropic efforts, Jamsetji Nussewanji Tata, the founder of the Tata Group of companies started the JN Tata endowment scheme in 1892. This scheme was provided loan scholarship for higher education. Of the 37 beneficiaries of this scheme, 15 joined the India Civil Services during the British rule in India. Tata Group report that by 1924, a third of the ICS officers in India were Tata scholars. In September 1898, Jamshetji pledged to offer about half his personal wealth that is INR 30 lakhs (then 2 lakh pounds) to set up an institute of research. After 13 years of this, with the generous donation of 300 acres of land from the Maharaja of Mysore, the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore was established5.

The sons of Jamshetji followed the father on his philanthropic endeavours. Both his sons, Sir Dorabji Tata and Sir Ratan Tata donated large amounts of their personal wealth to form trusts for various public services in India. The Sir Ratan Tata Trust was established in 1919, a year after the untimely death of the second son of Jamshetji Nusserwanji Tata. Later in 1932, Sir Dorabji Tata, the eldest son of Jamshetji Tata founded the Sir Dorabji
5

http://www.tata.com/ourcommitment/index.aspx?sectid=ei6stgDjpgA= <accessed May 10, 2009>

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Tata Trust. Of the many trusts of the Tatas, these two have remained to be the most prominent ones.

Through these trusts, the Tatas have been able to initiate several well known research institutions such as the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore (1911), Tata Institute of Social Studies, Mumbai (1936), Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai (1941), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai (1945), and International Institute of Population Studies, Mumbai (1956). In the recent years, the Tatas have also set up the JRD Tata Ecotechnology Centre, Chennai (1996) and plans to commission the Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata by 20096. For details on the various activities and contributions of the Tatas, see Exhibit 15-16. A number of Tata trusts were formed before the sixties. They were not so active in the seventies and have begun new development initiatives in the nineties. While most of the national institutions that were partially started by the Tata trusts before the nineties were based in and around Mumbai, the new institutions supported by the Tatas have now begun to spread to other parts of the country where their business activities have increased substantially. These institutions have served the Tata Sons as well as India in different ways.

As in 2008, while the Tata Sons controls about 114 companies, about 66 % of its equity capital are held by the various trusts of Tata Sons like Sir Dorabji Tata, Sir Ratan Tata and the members of the Tata family. For shareholders of Tata Sons Limited, see Exhibit 17 for the detailed break-up of shareholding of Tata Sons Limited (TSL).

Industrial Pioneers and Building of Goodwill


Being in trade and industry since 1868, the Tatas have had the business knowledge, experience, and the power to influence on the industrial policy in India. Being the pioneers in several industries, the Tatas were the natural choice of the bureaucrats and policy makers of the country for consultation. Being a leading industrial house since the early 20th century, the Tatas have commanded respect among the other business houses and industry associations in the country.
6

http://www.tata.com/ourcommitment/articles/inside.aspx?artid=mDZESzKS/54= < accessed May 10, 2009>

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

The experience of the two world wars probably shaped the investment decision of the Tatas to invest in two of the strategic sectors, viz., Airlines and Atomic energy. In 1932, the Tatas started Tata Airlines that was later nationalized by the Government of India in 1953. Tata Airlines was renamed as Indian Airlines but the Government of India could not find a better person than JRD Tata, who had deep interest and commitment in the Airlines operations, to be the Chairman of Indian Airlines. Similarly, just before the first atomic bomb was dropped in Hiroshima in 1945, the Tatas had approved to invest in Tata Institute of Fundamental Research that was to research in mathematics and physics. Later in 1957, over 60 scientists of TIFR were taken in by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre of the Government of India.

The Tata Sons Limited has had illustrious Chairmen. The family tree of the Tatas and the chairmen during the last 140 years of its existence is shown in Exhibit 18. In addition to the past Chairmen, JRD Tata and Ratan Tata in the last 70 years of Indian industry have served as role models through their achievements and contributions to industry and society. JRD Tata had many accolades to his credit. From being the first registered pilot from India, he went on to win the Bharat Ratna, the first ever businessmen to have won this highest civilian award in India. Ratan Tata has already been showered Padma Bhusan and Padma Vibhusan awards of India. A list of the various awards and recognition of JRD Tata and Ratan Tata are listed in Exhibit 19. All these public recognitions from India and outside India indeed go into making of a great brand of Tata Sons in the India and outside.

Being in the business for about 140 years and being the pioneers in several industries in India, the companies of Tata Sons have introduced several notable management practices in their respective companies which later became standard in the Indian industry. The eight hour working per day policy introduced in 1912 was enforced as a law in 1938 as per the Indian Factories Act. Similarly, its policies on free medical aid, employee welfare, maternity benefits, retiring gratuity, etc subsequently became norms in the Indian industry. See Exhibit 20 for the employee welfare / schemes introduced by Tata Sons and later adopted as standards in India. Tata Trusts of the first two generation of the

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Tatas and the leading role played by the holding companies of Tata Sons have been very well knit to build and portray the brand of Tata Group.

Tata Sons shaping the Industrial Policies in India


The Tatas had laid a strong business foundation in India by 1930 with its main business being in trading, textiles, spinning and weaving. It had also entered the business of steel, hydro-electric power, oil & soap, and insurance. See Exhibit 21-22 for the business ventures and the major milestones of Tata Sons. Operated by the various managing Agents of Britain and several business houses like the Tatas, and the Birlas, the Indian textile industry was a major force in global textile industry during the inter-war periods. During the World War-I, shortage of supplies from the British mills, many Indian textile companies made fabulous profits through exports. Through this exposure, the Indian business houses also realized the significance of investing in research and technology development.7 For example the Indian textile industry had been the major supplier of textiles to Japanese mills during 1920-1935.8

JRD Tata, the then Chairman of the Tata Sons and four other key industrialists of India like G.D. Birla, Kasturbhai Lalbhai, the textile mill owner of Ahmedabad, Sir Purushotamdas Thakurdas from Bombay and Sir Shri Ram from Delhi published a document titled A Plan of Economic Development for India in January 1944. The technocrats, viz., Sir Ardeshir Dalal, A.D. Shroff, and Dr. John Matthai who developed this plan were all from the Tatas. This plan came to be known as the Bombay Plan or the Tata-Birla Plan. This plan proposed a fifteen year period plan with a total investment of 100,000 million with massive investments in power, mining, roads, railways. Almost 50 % of the plan was slated for industrial development, 25% for housing and only 10% was planned for agriculture.

As the war in Europe came to an end, the Government of India under the British rule, on October 1944, invited a group of Indian industrialists and businessmen to visit England and America to visit industrial establishments and to contact leaders of industry and
7 8

Bagchi, A.K. (1972) The Private Investment in India 1900-1939, Cambridge University Press: New York All Japan Cotton Spinners Association (1949), Cotton Statistics of Japan, 1903-1944, Osaka, Japan

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

prominent businessmen in Britain and the Untied States. Prior to this announcement of the British Government, JRD Tata was aware of this and had communicated about it to close industrial colleagues, G.D. Birla vide letter dated 28 September, 1944. See Exhibit 23 for the content of the letter.

While the noted Indian industrialists and businessmen were to visit the west during the wartime, the war with Germany ended just before the scheduled date of departure. During this time, several leaders of the Indian freedom movement including Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru were languishing in jails. On the eve of their departure, viz., May 7, 1945 Mahatma Gandhi sent a public notice to these industrialists that appeared in The Bombay Chronicle that said9: All the big interests proclaim with one voice that India wants nothing less than her own elected National Government to shape her own destiny free of all control, British or other. This independence will not come for the asking. It will come only when the interests, big or small, are prepared to forgo the crumbs that fall to them from partnership with the British in the loot which British rule takes from India. Verbal protests will count for nothing so long as the partnership continues unchecked. The so-called unofficial deputation which will go to England and America dare not proceed, whether for inspection or for entering into a shameful deal, so long as the moving spirits of the Congress Working Committee are being detained without any trial for the sole crime of sincerely striving for Indias independence without shedding a drop of blood save their own. The mission however left within a week of the surrender of Germany and after a brief exchange of letters between G.D. Birla, J.R.D. Tata and Mahatma Gandhi. The final group for the visit included J.R.D. Tata, G.D. Birla and five others. They were accompanied by nine technical advisors with as many as three advisors from the Tata Group of companies viz., Sir Jehagir Ghandy of Tata Steel, Sumant Moolgaonkar of Associated Cement Companies, and B.W. Figgins of Flying School for Tatas. When India became independent, the leading industrial houses that of the Tatas, the Birlas and others wanted to lead the industrial development in the country as per the Bombay Plan (Tata-Birla Plan). However, given the socio-economic and demographic
9

Lala, R.M. (1992), Beyond the Blue Mountain, A Life of JRD Tata, Viking, Penguin Books (India) Ltd.

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

position of the country, the political leaders who took charge of the nation took a different view from that of the Indian industrialists. India focussed more on development of agricultural production contrary to the Tata-Birla Plan. India also adopted a socialist approach than the capitalist approach of the Tata-Birla Plan.

The shift in the direction of development of India after Independence was a huge set back to the Tata Sons and JRD Tata in particular. Nationalization of strategic industries like the Airlines and Insurance hurt the Tatas the most. JRD Tata had taken great interest to invest and develop the Tata Airways since 1932. While Tata Airways was nationalized in 1953, he continued to be chairman of the company until 1973. The biggest setback to the Tatas was the termination of the Managing Agency System on April 2, 1970. With this change, Tata Sons Limited and Tata Industries, both Managing Agents of the Tata companies had to shed their management control to individual companies.

Despite the differences between JRD Tatas approach to Indias development and that of Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and many others, after India got independence, JRD was consulted by the Government of India on several matters of national policy and industrial development. Many political leaders and bureaucrats often confided with him on several issues which he would then carry them over to the Prime Ministers viz., Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi. JRD would often come to know about the Government policies ahead of others. Given his own network, credibility, power and influence could organize the Indian industrialists to effectively lobby with the Government whenever required. JRDs letter dated 14 November, 1947 to G.D. Birla is a case in point. See Exhibit 24 for the letter.

Not only did JRD Tata have easy access to several leaders of India viz., Gandhi, Nehru, Vallabhai Patel, J.P. Narayan, Morarji Desai and many others but also the directors of the Tata Sons have been highly networked with the policy makers and bureaucrats all through the history of independent India. The Chairmen and the Directors of Tata Sons have shaped several policies of the country by being part of various committees and panels formed by the Government. The association of current board of directors of Tata

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Sons viz., Ratan Tata, J.J. Irani Syamal Gupta, Ishant Hussain and Arun Kumar with several key panels and committees of the Government suggest the power of influence that the Tatas on the policy making in India.

The Chairmen and Directors of the Tata Group of companies have always been part of key institutions, committees, and panels of the Government of India that carve out key policies for Indian industry, commerce and trade. Today, Ratan Tata is the Chairman of the Government of Indias Investment Commission and Member of Prime Ministers Council on Trade and Industry among many other associations with the policy makers. J.J. Irani has been the Chairman of the expert committee set up by the Government of India to draft the new Companies Act, was nominated on the expert committee set up by the Government for recommending a roadmap for the coal sector in India, and has been a member of Working Groups for the sixth, seventh and eighth national Five Year Plans of India among holding other influential positions. See Exhibit 25 for details association of the current directors of Tata Sons.

Several Tata employees have served the Government, the public sector enterprises, and the politicians over the years since Independence. In the early years of Independence, JRD was requested to be the Chairman of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited that he politely declined. JRD nevertheless served in the board of several government institutions like Indian Airlines, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, etc. In 1950, Harekrishna Mahtab, Union Minister of Industry requested JRD to spare some of his professionals to manage the public sector enterprises. In 1971, N.A. Palkhivala, Legal Advisor and senior director of the Tatas served as the lawyer of Indira Gandhi to present her case of election to the Lower House in the Supreme Court. Though in 1975, after Indira Gandhi declared emergency, he refused to take up the case. In 1981, Indira Gandhi appointed Sumant Mulgaonkar from TELCO (now Tata Motors) as the Managing Director of Maruti Udyog Limited that successfully produced the low cost peoples car in India fulfilling the dream of Sanjay Gandhi, the son of Indira Gandhi. In June 2003, P. Chidambaram, who earlier served as the Finance Minister and then served as the Finance Minster and Home Minster in the Government of India during 2004-09, was the lawyer to represent the case of a

10

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Tata Teleservices company in the court of law.10 A glimpse of major policies relating to the various industries of Tata Sons is given Exhibit 26. Given the traditional stronghold of the Tatas with the government, legislators, policy makers, bureaucrats, lawyers, and industry bigwigs, how much would the Tata Sons have influenced and shaped these policies and regulations?

The power of the Tatas in shaping the policies of the country have often kept the Tatas in the good books of the policy makers and bureaucrats and have given them easy access to them all through the post independent period. In the 1945, T.T. Krishnamachari, the Minister of Industries quickly approved the Tatas proposal to enter into road transport and ensured that the secretaries do everything available to the Tatas. Similarly, in 1948, the Tatas got very quick approval for Air India International. In the eighties with Rajiv Gandhi as the Prime Minister, the Tatas got approvals for many of its proposals. In 1990, Tata Chemical got a contract of INR 3000 crores petrochemical project.11

Building the Tata Brand


Traditionally, the key function of Tata Sons Limited has been to retain the trade name and build the Tata brand that could be used by all the companies in the group. Tata Sons has indeed developed a great brand over the years. Once Ratan Tata took over the chairmanship of the Tata Sons, he undertook a massive Brand building exercise of the Tata Group of companies; the cost of the exercise was however raised from the different companies of the group. Contributions varied from 0.10% to 0.25% of net income of each of the group companies of Tata Sons.

The Tata brand has been built over hundred years. The first two generations lead by Jamshetji Nusserwanji Tata and his two sons Sir Dorabji Tata and Sir Ratan Tata set up trusts for various development causes. Although most of their donations and contributions went towards building institutions in Bombay and Pune, they did nevertheless contribute to the society at large. Subsequently, JRD Tata served as the
10

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/bline/2003/06/19/stories/2003061902540300.htm <accessed May 8, 2009> 11 Lala, R.M. (1992), Beyond the Blue Mountain, A Life of JRD Tata, Viking, Penguin Books (India) Ltd.

11

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Chairman of Tata Sons for over five decades. Being a leading industrial house of the country, the Tatas played their role in the struggle for independence and in the planning and development of the Indian economy. As JRD Tata continued as the Chairman of Tata Sons under the leadership of about five different Prime Minister, their ministers and bureaucrats of the country and was well networked with them, he could wield a strong influence on the key decision makers of the country.

The management practices and the employee welfare practices that Tata Sons introduced in their group companies over the years further increased the visibility of the Tatas and the created a strong goodwill among its employees and the public at large. Ratan Tata, the current chairman of Tata Sons under the pressure of competition and fear of losing control of individual companies in the group undertook a massive advertisement of the group and restructured the management and ownership of group companies to give a new lease of life to the Tata Brand.

By virtue of their being in trade, commerce and industry in India and their being the first in most business ventures since 1868 give the Tatas a positive image of a company synonymous with nation building. The work of the charitable trusts of the Tatas, contributions of chairmen and directors of Tata Sons towards the industrial development of the nation, goodwill of the employees and the general public over the years, aided with extensive advertisement of the Tatas has lead to the creation of a very high brand value of the Tatas. The positive image, trust and goodwill of the company make the Tata brand very powerful.

Further, the complex shareholding patterns of Tata sons, management reporting mechanisms, and strong business-industry-government network with a well managed corporate image of the Tatas make it difficult to understand the strategy of the Tata Sons. Would it therefore be wise to un-bundle the many aspects of brand building, shareholding structure and its networks to understand the mechanics of Tata Sons in achieving the gigantic growth and profit in the post liberalization period of India?

12

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

With the opening up of the economy, rise of other business houses and intense competition in the economy and the market have lead Ratan Tata to adopt certain practices that might not gel with the image of the group that people in general carried about the Tatas. However, with the large scale campaign for Tata Brand that Ratan Tata conceived around 1985, the brand image of the Tatas has been bolstered to envelop the good image of the Tatas around every company in the group irrespective of the way they operate. The figure below provides a pictorial representation of how the image of individual company is portrayed through the traditional image of the Tatas.

J.N. Tata Trust, Dorabji Tata Trust, & Ratan Tata Trust

BRAND OF TATA SONS


TCS

Tata Tea

Tata Motors

Tata Steel

Process and Methods of Growth in a Fast Changing Environment


The case of Tata Sons presents an intriguing story of the management processes and methods that Tata Sons adopted to grow in a fast changing socio-economic-politicalcultural environment of a developing country. This section shall discuss issues of corporate and management restructuring, financial restructuring and resource

reallocation, and raising capital, resources and capabilities.

TTLS

TCL

13

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Corporate and Management Restructuring


The Tatas have been the pioneers in India on policies of labour management. While the paternalistic approach the Tata companies were in vogue in the Japanese textile mills in the early twentieth century, the Tatas have been the most innovative in India industry with regard to labour management. The wide international exposure that the Tatas have had by virtue of being in business since 1868 gave them the opportunity to adopt the best labour management practices in India.

As early as 1949, the Tatas invited the Society of Jesus to establish the Xavier Labour Relation Institute (XLRI) in Jamshedpur to train professionals on labour relations. The American Jesuits set up the management school as there was no such management school in India. XLRI has been the top business school in India on industrial relations and personal management. Tata were the first to introduce several labour welfare schemes that later became standards in the Indian industry. Exhibit 20 provides a list of labour welfare schemes introduced by the Tatas. As a result of these innovative practices, the labour force in the group companies of the Tatas have been the most loyal of all labour groups and they contributed well to the efficiency and growth of their respective companies.

With the removal of the Managing Agency System in 1970, individual companies got the legal right to operate more freely and some of the Managing Directors who were encouraged to operate freely under JRD Tata began to exercise their control on the companies. Probably, the labour had also begun to be more independent and was influenced by outside labour unions. Under the changed circumstances, the labour also associated more with their respective Managing Directors than with the Directors of Tata Sons. However, the way Ratan Tata, the newly appointed Chairman of Telco (now, Tata Motors) dealt with Krishnan Pushparajan Nair, general secretary of the Telco Kamgar Sanghatana (TKS) showed the hard hitting nature behind the soft exterior of Ratan Tata. It also showed the power of the Tatas to silence erring labour leaders and solve major labour problems.

14

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Nair, the son of trade union leader, after working in Philips for some time, had joined Telco as a miller in September 1976. In March 1988, he was suspended for alleged threatening to murder a security guard and sacked a few months later. On being sacked, Nair used the unresolved wage agreement to organize the labour in Telco, Pune factory to go on tool down strike. As the local authorities took Nair into preventive custody, the second shift workers hijacked buses which were to take them to the plant at Pimpri, Pune.

The Chief Minister of Maharastra, Sharad Pawar was brought in to mediate with Nair and his supporters. However, the fight between Telco management and its labour belonging to TKS intensified. On the one hand, Ratan Tata went to the local people and the media to create a public opinion and also signed a three year retrospective agreement with TKSs rival, the Telco Employees Union (TEC), offering a wage hike of INR 585 and lumpsum arrears of INR 7000. On the other hand, Nair announced indefinite fast at the Shaniwarwada fort. Dutta Samant, the well known labour leader rushed to Pune to express his support to the TKS members. The Janata Dal leaders, Sambhajirao Kakade, George Fernandes and Madhu Dandavate also showed their support to Nair. Meanwhile, Sharad Pawar, the Chief Minister of Maharastra was increasingly worried about the strikes political repercussion.

On September 29, 1988, 2.30 AM, the State Reserve Police and Pune city police launched Operation Crackdown. Eighty buses with police force stopped outside the Shaniwarwada forts quadrangle and cordoned off the fort, stormed inside and rounded up the striking workers. The workers were evacuated from the fort and taken to different jails. Nair was charged with attempting to commit suicide and defying prohibitory orders and was released on bail the next day and the strike had come to an end12.

JRD conceived and instituted the Tata Administrative Service in the 1950s to groom the top management of the various group companies of the Tatas. Indeed, JRD was very successful in attracting and retaining the best people through this process. JRD would spot the talent, especially among the senior executives and let them operate freely.

12

Piramal, Gita. 1996. Business Maharajas, Penguin Books India (P) Ltd. Pg. 380-386

15

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Indeed, Tatas had the advantage of having several industry luminaries during the chairmanship of JRD. Tata directors such as Ardeshir Dalal, Sir Homi Modi, FE Dinshaw, AD Shroff and John Mathai were business legends. This set of directors made way to another powerful group comprising of Sumant Moolgaonkar, Russi Mody, Darbari Seth, Nani Palkhivala, FC Kohli and Ajit Kerkar.

Restructuring of top management began with Ratan Tata taking over the Chairmanship of Tata Industries Limited from JRD Tata in October 1981. It was a small company but was one of the two holding companies of the Tatas along with the Tata Sons Limited. While taking care of his ailing mother in New York, Ratan Tata wrote out a new agenda called the 1983 Tata Strategic Plan, for the group companies. The proposed plan of Ratan Tata was not accepted well by some of the senior influential directors who had built their respective empires since the scrapping of Managing Agency System in 1970 and each company had more independence.

Ratan Tata was appointed the Deputy Chairman of Telco on January 31, 1985 and on March 19, 1991, JRD indicated to Ratan Tata to take over the reins of control of the Tata Group of companies. On March 25, 1991, the board of Tata Sons Limited appointed Ratan Tata as the Chairman of Tata Sons Limited. Ratan systematically brought in the changes that he had planned out in his 1983 Tata Strategic Plan document. It appears that with the change of guard at the top, several changes in the top management of the group companies were brought about to be able to execute the growth plans of Ratan Tata.

Ratan Tata followed up with the issue of Tiscos (now Tata Steel) acceptance of the Tata Sons retirement policy. Under this policy, the top management had to retire. Mody crossed seventy five on January 17, 1993 and Ratan prepared enough support of the Board of Tata Sons to adopt the retirement plan on March 11, 1993. Subsequently, the board approved removing Russy Modi from the position of Managing Director of Tisco

16

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

on April 11, 199313. With this the illustrious career of Russi Mody, once a blue eyed boy of JRD came to an end.

In 1997, Ajit Kerkar, a legend in the Indian hotel industry and who turned a single loss making property, the Taj Mahal Hotel to a respected international chain was removed from office after levelling serious charges of misdemeanour and irregularities of violating the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. He was charged for parking USD 4.91 million paid by Singapore Airlines in the Taj groups Hong Kong subsidiary for three years instead of immediately repatriating to India. The members of Board of Directors including Ratan Tata claimed to have no knowledge about this issue and hence Kerkar was held solely responsible for this offence by the Tatas. While RBI seemed to agree with the version of Ratan Tata but the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) was not convinced that the Board of Directors of Indian Hotels were not aware of this at all, especially, since Indian Hotels was greatly expanding to foreign markets during this period and the board must have been actively involved in the operations of Indian Hotels during this time14.

The most recent firing of top management from the company of the Tata Sons has been Dilip Pendse, Managing Director of Tata Finance Limited (TFL). Pendse another stalwart of the Tata companies was accused of running losses to the tune of nearly INR 500 crores. The entire blame for TFL losses was on Pendse and he was charged with several cases by the Tatas. The Board of Directors of TFL again claimed that they were not aware of the developments in TFL. This argument that the Board of TFL was unaware seemed improbable to many because by this time one of the directors of Tatas, J E Talaulicer was under investigation for insider trading. Further, when the A. F. Fergusson report did not endorse either the innocence or ignorance of other Tata directors, the Tatas rejected the report of A F Fergusson who it had employed to audit the matter. Surprisingly, A F Fergusson sacked its senior partner Y M Kale15 following the rejection of the report by the Tatas. Has there been more such throw outs of the key professionals
Piramal, Gita. 1996. Business Maharajas, Penguin Books India (P) Ltd. Pg. 386-392 http://www.indianexpress.com/ie/daily/20010203/sucheta.htm <accessed May 9, 2009> 15 http://www.rediff.com/money/2002/aug/21dalal.htm <accessed May 9, 2009>
14
13

17

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

who had immensely contributed to the growth of Tata Sons. From the above cases of accusation and firing of senior directors, how do we explain the age old great management practices of Tata Sons in its pursuit of control of group companies and their management?

Financial Restructuring & Resource Reallocation


With the abolition of the Managing Agency system on April 2, 1970, a great phase of nearly 100 years was over for the Tata. Nationalization of key industries that the Tatas had pioneered, development focussed on agriculture and state run enterprises contrary to the proposed Tata-Birla (Bombay) plan demoralized Tata Sons Chairman, JRD Tata. The group slowly became mere confederation with loose control from the Tatas. JRDs persuasive skills and a paternalistic attitude kept the group together despite dissent from some quarters of the group. As against the approach of Jawaharlal Nehru, JRD spoke vociferously for free enterprise; some of his lieutenants like A.D. Shroff also spoke strongly in favour of free economy. Shroff also set up the Forum for Free Enterprise, as voice of the private sector against Nehruvian socialism.

When Ratan Tata was appointed as the Chairman of Tata Industries Limited (TIL), he found himself handicapped to even propose a group plan and group strategy as many of the larger companies of the group seemed to be independent of the Tata Sons and Tata Industries, the two holding companies in the group. The holding companies had very little shareholding in the group companies and rightly so, the individual companies like Tisco (now Tata Steel) and Telco (now Tata Motors) could afford to disagree or disobey the norms proposed by the Tata Sons. Ratan Tata did feel that the Tata Sons cannot impose on the group companies without significant financial shareholdings in them.

The winds of liberalization had begun to blow around 1978 and did speed up after 1985 by Rajiv Gandhi, the then Prime Minister. Ratan Tata took opportunity of the changed circumstances to begin the financial restructuring process. He began by seeking royalty commission to the tune of INR 300 million from the group companies that used the Tata name. He subsequently raised INR 3000 million for Tata Sons by asking the group

18

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

companies to subscribe to the rights issue of Tata Sons. In effect, this move increased the shareholding of Tata Sons in the group companies. Tata Sons then used this capital to invest in some group companies for expansion or acquisition or to invest in some high technology industries, like TCS, Tata Communication, Tata Teleservices. Tata Sons sold some shares of TCS that is largely held by the Tatas to raise capital for Tata Steel and in the process further raised its shareholding in Tata Steel.

The rights issue of Tata Sons crystallized the consolidation process started by Ratan Tata. After the rights issue, Tata Sons Limited (TSL) share in Tisco (Tata Steel) increased from 2.5% in 1995 to 8.5% in 1996 and then by 2005, it increased to 19.8%. In Tata Motors, TSLs share increased from 1.8% in 1995 to 2.7% in 1996 and then by 2008, it increased to 21.9%. In the same manner, TSLs share price increased from 5.6% in 1995 to 6.3% in 1996 and then increased to 28.7% in 2008.

Before 1995, the holding companies of the Tata, viz., Tata Sons Limited (TSL) and Tata Industries Limited (TIL) has small shareholding in the group companies ranging from 0.01% to 15%. However, a substantial financial restructuring of the group companies took place after 1995. By the year 2000, TSL had 14.17% share in Tata Motors and 19.86% share in Tata Steel. Similarly, TIL had also increased its share in the financial companies it held. By the year 2008, TSL increased its share in Tata Motors to 22.36% and in Tata Steel to 19.8%. The Tatas tried to hold most of their group companies through TSL. The shareholding structure of TSL and TIL and the crossholding of the listed group companies for the year 2000 and for the year 2005 are shown in Exhibit 27 28.
16

TSL has also increased its shareholding in its subsidiary companies around the

world. See Exhibit 29-30 for the extent of Tata Sons interest in the subsidiaries and its quoted and unquoted investments in the stock market.

Raising Capital, Resources & Capabilities


Ratan Tata led the team of Tata Sons to undertake the crucial part of raising capital, resources and capabilities for the holding company and the group companies. There were
16

Kakani, Ram Kumar & Joshi, Tejas. 2006. Cross holding strategy to increase control: case of the Tata Group, Working paper, 06-03, XLRI Jamshedpur.

19

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

three ways of generating capital and assets, viz., internal sources that is from the group companies, the capital market or from the public and purchase of valuable public assets and capabilities from the Government of India at throw away price. Tata Sons adopted all the three methods to acquire capital, resources, and capabilities in the fast changing developing economy with several institutional deficiencies.

From Group Companies As per the mandate of Tata Sons, it were to retain the trade mark of the Tatas and get license fees from the group companies to use the brand name of the Tatas. The commissions that Tata Sons received prior to 1995 was a small amount and hence it did very little reserves to engage in large brand building exercise and to give all the group companies a group identity that had faded over the years with the abolition of the Managing Agency system in 1970. Tata Sons estimated that it would need about INR 300 million per annum for publicizing the Tata Brand. Ratan Tata sought 0.10% to 0.25% of net income of each group company for the Tata Brand Equity scheme17. Despite resentment from various quarters, the board of directors from various group companies passed a resolution to contribute to the Tata Brand Equity scheme. Many argued if Tata Sons was asserting more than that of an ordinary shareholder.

From seeking contributions from the group companies for a massive advertisement campaign for the group companies of Tata Sons, Ratan Tata went on to ask the group companies to subscribe to the rights issues and preference shares of Tata Sons Ltd. On September 1995, Tata Sons Ltd invited subscriptions to INR 300 crores (3000 million) rights issue from the group companies at a premium. The various charitable trusts of the Tata Sons Ltd were to sell their rights to the group companies18. There were several objectionable remarks to both these means of capital generation. Through this process, the Tata Sons not only raised substantial amount of capital but also set in motion to raise its own shareholding in the group companies such that it could legally assert itself on the
17

Fee Structure of scheme: right to use the Tata name in both company banner and products: 0.25%, right to use the Tata name in either the company banner or products - 0.15%, right to be perceived as a Tata company: 0.10% 18 As per Charitable Trust Act and Income tax Act, charitable trusts were not permitted to invest in shares of private companies, http://www.capindia.org/helpguide_1.htm. <accessed May 14, 2009>

20

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

group companies. This policy of Tata Sons was strongly resented by many; as the individual companies had to divert their valuable cash to buy the rights issues of Tata Sons that was a small company with ordinary shares of the group companies. It was also argued that the shares were overvalued and that the shareholders of Tata Sons gained at the expense of the shareholders of the group companies19.

From Individuals and Institutions through the Stock Market With the onset of economic liberalization, the general public especially the small retail investors have been encouraged to invest in the stock market. The fourteen group companies of the Tata Sons Ltd. have had a market capitalization (number of share*share price) of INR 211907 crores in 2008 and has been the third largest group after the PSU of Government of India, Reliance Industries Limited. Among the group companies of Tata Sons, TCS, Tata Steel, Tata Power, Tata Motors, Tata Teleservices, Tata Tea, and Tata Investment Corporation have amassed the maximum capital from the general public and the public and private institutions. In 2008, the market capitalization of a few group companies is shown in brackets: TCS (INR 80239 crores), Tata Steel (INR 47175 crores), Tata Power (INR 23096 crores) and Tata Motors (INR 15769 crores). The details of market capitalization of different group companies are shown in Exhibits 5-14

The financial handling of ACC is yet another episode of how Tata Sons used the stock market to generate capital from a business that it wanted to divest. In her news report Sucheta Dalal20 writes In 1995 the Tatas with 11 per cent in ACC allowed it to be called a professional-run company. It then issues rights shares at a whooping INR 3900 premium ACC's face value was then Rs 100 per share -- which devolved largely on financial institutions. In 1998 they had increased their holding by two per cent, called it a Tata company and attempted to give themselves preferential shares at a discount to the market price so as to raise the Tata holding to 17.8 per cent. The financial institutions refused to accept this. Subsequently, the Tatas sold 7.2 % of its holding to Gujurat Ambuja at INR 390 per share as compared to INR 110 per share, the price at which they
19 20

http://www.expressindia.com/news/fe/daily/19970716/19755013.html <accessed May 14, 2009>, http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=cb2f642a-6e5d-cc68492e8249d8cc&base=sub_sections_content&f&t=Is+the+sun+setting+over+the+Tata+Empire%3F <accessed May 9, 2009>

21

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

wanted the FIIs to issue preference share to them. Although, SEBI, backed by the Attorney General ruled that the acquisition of Tata stake in ACC was not a case of takeover21, it was a breach of trust with the retail investors as the stakes were sold without it being offered in the open market.

Acquisition of Public Assets and Capabilities at cheap price The policy of disinvestment of government owned public sector enterprises (PSE) has been a good tool for private companies to acquire the public assets at very cheap price. While the purpose of disinvestment was to revive and make the loss making PSE efficient, the government undertook to sell some of the best placed profit making companies like VSNL, IPCL, CMC, etc. The Tatas did not loose opportunity to get its share of the public assets. It acquired 51 % of CMC and 45% of VSNL, a profit making, Navratna PSE. JRD Tata would have been most happy to be at this moment as he had faught tooth and nail about 50 years ago, when Tata Airlines was nationalized in 1953. He had also accused the government for not having paid appropriate compensation for Tata Airlines.

In December 2001, the Tatas took over 51% shareholdings of the Computer Maintenance Corporation (CMC), a state run public sector enterprise (PSE) that enjoyed a dominant position an IT infrastructure solutions provider. Tata Sons emerged as the sole bidder to claim CMC and paid only INR 152 crores22 to acquire this strategic asset to strengthen its own firm TCS. Through the backing of the Government, CMC had developed a strong partnership with Microsoft, IBM, Cisco, HP, Sun Microsystems and Oracle. Again a state run enterprise, CMC had a strong and large client base of the public sector enterprises (PSEs) of the country that form the largest pool of companies in India. Indian Railways, ONGC, GAIL, IOC were some of CMCs long standing clients.23 Tata Sons soon leveraged these capabilities to its IT firm, TCS, where Tata Sons alone has 74.81% shareholding in 2008. Interestingly, the profit after tax of TCS has increased from INR 1.54 crores in 2001 to INR 4508 crores in 2008(see Exhibit 7).
21 22

http://www.indianexpress.com/ie/daily/20010128/dalal.htm, <accessed May 9, 2009> http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/01oct16/busi.htm#1 <accessed May 14, 2009> 23 http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/iw/2007/08/19/stories/2007081950451100.htm <accessed May 8, 2009>

22

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Tata Sons acquired 25% of VSNL by offering only INR 1439 crores to the government. Tata Sons acquired another 20% from the open market. In all, Tata Sons paid just about INR 2500 crores to get a controlling stake of VSNL and its assets and cash reserves. VSNL was a rich organization. Its monopoly in international long distance (ILD) voice and internet was the biggest advantage to Tata Sons. VSNL possessed prime real estate worth about INR 1200 crores. One of the major assets was a stockpile of INR 5182 crores which was considerable even after disbursement of the special dividends. Further, the Government of India made a provision that the government owned MTNL and BSNL would have to use VSNL as their ILD carrier for two years after the disinvestment. VSNL would also get a free license to provide NLD and a nationwide ISP license24.

Soon after the VSNL acquisition, Tata Sons ensured that VSNL invest INR 1200 crores in Tata Teleservices Limited, new company floated by the Tata Sons where Tata group were to put INR 2,552 crores. Many observers argued that this move of the Tatas was clear stripping of cash reserves of the erstwhile profit making company25. Further, the valuation of assets of the PSEs including CMC and VSNL that were divested is another issue to understand how efficiency of private firms has been built. The controversies over VSNL disinvestment died down with the interventions from Pramod Mahajan and L K Advani of the Bharatiya Janata Party, who was then in power at the centre but the issues remain alive to see the process of growth of private firms. Indeed ever since, Tata Sons acquired 45% of VSNL, the performance of VSNL has been going down. From profit after tax of INR 1407 crores in 2001, the profit of VSNL (now Tata Communication) has come down to INR 304 crores in 2008. While the assets of most firms have gone up, the assets of VSNL has also come in post disinvestment period. See Exhibit 9 for the financial figures of VSNL (now Tata Communication Ltd) before and after the disinvestment. In the above context, how do we explain the argument of the Government that disinvestment would improve efficiency of PSE?

24

Jain, Rekha & Venkataraman Krishnan. Privatization of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/ctps/pdf/VSNL%20Privatization%20Rekha%20Krishnan.pdf and Naib, Sudhir. 2004. Disinvestment in India, Policies, Procedures, Practices, Sage Publication. New Delhi. 25 http://www.hinduonnet.com/2002/06/11/stories/2002061101842000.htm <accessed May 7, 2009>, http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2002/06/01/stories/2002060101151700.htm <accessed May 14, 2009>, http://www.rediff.com/money/2002/jun/06vsnl1.htm <accessed May 7, 2009>

23

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Arising out of these resource and capacity build up at home, Tata Sons Limited (TSL) had a run on mergers and acquisition since 2001. See Exhibit 31 for a detailed list of its mergers and acquisition. See also Exhibit 32 for the various international projects that it has undertaken.

Has Growth been at the cost of Principles?


Tata Sons has remained to be a leading holding company in India. It has grown massively during the last about 20 years and has emerged as the leading multinational from India that many Indians have been proud about. The ideals of Tata Trust, involvement of the Tatas in the industrial development and the promotion of a Tata brand of values, ethics and excellence in business help the general observers to miss the various growth issues and how the Tatas have ignored at different points of time in history that is possibly against the principles of a Trust based organization. The most contentious of the issues is the issue of land acquisition for industrial growth.

In the early years, the Tata Sons started the salt works in Mithapur in 1939, a business on which Tata Chemicals was built. Tatas acquired land from the local Waghirs, which probably was objected by some local people. The British Government then in power stepped in and forcibly acquired land for the Tatas so that their salt works could be established. Not able to fight the British Government, a local whose land had been forcibly acquired and was paid some compensation, wanted the blood of the General Manager of the Mithapur Works as revenge. The Tatas tactfully managed him by recruiting him as the body guard of the General Manager26.

In recent years, the Tatas have been in the news for land acquisitions across Orissa, West Bengal, and Jharkhand for their steel and car projects. B. Muthuraman, Managing Director of Tata Steel signed an agreement with the Government of Orissa on November 17, 2004 to set up a 6 million ton per annum integrated steel plant in Orissa and it was allotted 2000 acres of land in Kalinganagar, Jajpur district. Soon after signing the

Memorandum with the Government of Orissa, Tata Steel established the JN Tata
26

Lala, R.M. (1992), Beyond the Blue Mountain, A Life of JRD Tata, Viking, Penguin Books (India) Ltd. Pg. 253

24

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Technical Education Centre at Gopalpur in 2005 to improve the employability of the youth of Orissa27.

The local tribals whose land had been acquired by the Government had been opposed to the land acquisition and the compensation thereof. Despite the prohibitory orders of the district collector to Tata Steel to enter the tensed zone, reportedly a team of Tata agents, who identified themselves from Eco-Design came to the site and started provocative surveys in the area and commenced blasting activities on January 2, 2006. The local inhabitants gushed to the site to resist the activities of the agents and fight between the local people and the agents began. The police force soon joined the troubled area and the fight resulted in killing of twelve protestors from among the local inhabitants28. Subsequently, the Government of Orissa announced compensation to the twelve bereaved families and the matter was closed. Tata Steel seemed to have begun its work in the allotted area. Interestingly, the Land Acquisition Bill 2007 states public purpose to include several types of public facilities including mining.

The land acquisition row of the Tatas for its small car manufacturing facility in Singur, Nandigram, West Bengal is another chapter of Tata Sons that reveals its modus operandi of land acquisition, growth objectives and commitment to people. Tata Motors Vice President (Finance), R.S. Thakur signed the agreement for 90 year land lease of 650 acres (out of a total of 997 acres) with West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation, Managing Director Debasis Som and West Bengal Industry Secretary Sabyasachi Sen. The cost of lease was INR1000 crores for 997 acres, which was to be paid over a period of 45 years. For the first 5 years, Tata Motors had to pay INR 1 crore per annum; in next 10 years, it had to pay INR 10 crores and in the next 30 years, it was to pay INR 20 crores per annum. Many questioned whether so much of land was required for the small car plant project of the Tata. Some also questioned whether alternate location could be provided instead of fertile land of Singur that produced three crops a year and sustained
27 28

http://www.tatasteel.com/company/investments_kalinganagar.asp <accessed May 7, 2009> http://orissamatters.com/2007/01/18/tata-provokes-violence/ <accessed May 7, 2009>, Video Clipping: file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/amar.XIM.000/Desktop/Tata%20Sons/Breaching%20Trust%20u nder%20Competiition/Tata%20Steel%20Bullet.htm <accessed May 7, 2009> and http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4686638.stm <accessed May 7, 2009>

25

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

the livelihood of 10,000 people29. As the matter was taken to the Kolkata High Court; the courts verdict was that the land was acquired for public purpose as per the Land Acquisition Bill 2007.

Subsequently, the Tatas pulled out of West Bengal and bargained with other states for land and incentives before finally choosing to set up the small car factory in Gujurat. Here the question arises how the Tata Sons in both the states, Orissa and West Bengal was successful in engaging the political parties and state machinery to deal with the protestors of land acquisition and then quietly move on with its pursuits of business.

It is also interesting to see the timing of the Tata Trust to contribute to West Bengal. During the Tata Sons engagement with West Bengal in the recent years for the small car project and for real estate development by the Tata group associate Shapoorji, the Dorabji Tata Trust committed to commission the Tata Medical Centre in Kolkata in 200930.

The agreement between the Government of Chhattisgarh and the Tatas in June 2005, for setting up a steel plant in Bastar, atrocities against those who opposed the land acquisition in Bastar have also been reported. Tata Steel is to acquire over 2000 acres of tribal land belonging to 10 villages in Lohandiguda block near the Chitrakot waterfall on Indravati river. Both local leaders and activists have been humiliated and threatened by the local goons and the police. One non tribal activist was slapped, not allowed to stay in any hotel and hounded out of Bastar when he came to speak on behalf of the protestors. The collector of Dantewara district has even called a meeting of all political parties except the CPI, journalist, business leaders and others to reiterate that opposition to the Tata project will not be tolerated31. These cases of land acquisition where the Tatas have used the official machinery to get past the resistance of the local people raise the issues of the ethical nature of big businesses.

29

http://www.europe-solidaire.org/spip.php?article9170 <accessed may 7, 2009>, Video Clipping: file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/amar.XIM.000/Desktop/Tata%20Sons/Breaching%20Trust%20u nder%20Competiition/Tata%20-%20Singur.htm


30

31

http://www.tata.com/ourcommitment/sub_index.aspx?sectid=Mw/mP8IlwTE= <accessed May 7, 2009> http://aidindia.org/main/content/view/375/1/ <accessed may 7, 2009>

26

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

In 1997, the Tata Sons were suspected to be supporting the banned organization, United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) in order to protect its tea gardens in Assam and help the tea supplies to its group company, Tata Tea. Tata Teas involvement with the banned outfit was revealed when police found a visiting card of a senior Tata executive from a hardcore ULFA militant when arrested in Mumbai along with Pranati Deka, ULFAs cultural secretary. They were nabbed by police in the Mumbai Airport when the two were returning to Kolkata with Pranti Dekas newborn baby. Pranti Deka had gone to Mumbai to dliver her baby in the upmarket Jaslok Hospital at the expense of the tea company. 32

Dogra, General Manager of the North Indian Plantation Division of Tata Tea was arrested for aiding and abetting unlawful activities of the banned outfit, ULFA and knowingly conniving with those waging war against the state. Another Tata executive Dr. Brajen Gogoi, who was also reported to be personally involved in the entire process, was charged for working with the terror group. As the news about the arrest broke out, senior executives of the Tatas contacted the Home Minister, Government of India but since the Home Ministry did not have the report, Ratan Tata sought appointment with the home secretary, K Padmanabhaiah. The Home Secretary obliged and contacted the DirectorGeneral of Police to ascertain details regarding the alleged funding. 33 Interestingly, although Deka and her associate were arrested on August 23, 1997 and shifted to Guwahati on August 31, the police did not submit any report to the Union Ministry regarding Deka after her arrest.

Dr. Gogoi another accused in the case was an employee of Tata Tea since 1975 and was well known to the ULFA chief Paresh Barua who considered Gogoi as his elder brother. Gogoi arrived from a study trip to Harvard, USA on September 6 and checked into a guest house. However, sensing the police interrogation, Gogoi disappeared. During the meeting on September 15 of Ratan Tata with P. Mahanta, the then Chief Minister of Assam, when the Chief Secretary, V.S. Jafa insisted that Gogoi was in Chicago, both had no answer. Tata tea had also obtained anticipatory bail for Gogoi from the Mumbai High

32

33

http://www.rediff.com/money/sep/15tata.htm <accessed May 7, 2009> http://www.rediff.com/money/sep/15tata1.htm <accessed may 7, 2009>

27

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Court on September 16, 1997.34 From the above reports, it is rather difficult to assume that Ratan Tata and the Tata Sons were not party to any unethical practices. From the above dealings of the Tatas on land acquisition or involving with goons and terror groups, how do we situate the ethical brand value of the Tata Sons as has been projected and sold?

34

http://www.india-today.com/itoday/20101997/cov.html <accessed May 7, 2009>

28

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Questions for discussion:


1. How did the company evolve through the Tata Trust and the Managing Agency System? 2. How did the company influence and direct the economic policy and management practices in India? 3. How has the brand of the Tatas been built? 4. How has the company/group performed in the domestic markets? 5. How has the company/group performed in the foreign markets? 6. Is there a necessity to de-link the Tata Brand from the business behaviour of the Tata enterprises? 7. How did the company move from being a Managing Agent to corporate entity with high share in its holding companies? 8. What has been the process of growth in Tata Sons? 9. How were the corporate and management restructuring carried out? 10. How has the group raised capital and resources in the home country? 11. How has the company restructured its finance and resource reallocation? 12. How have the group exploited the various factor endowments of business operations in the home country to grow? 13. How has the characteristic of the domestic market supported the growth of the firm? 14. How have the various industry policies and incentive structure (LPG policies) of the Government of India been formulated that advance the growth objectives of the group? 15. How did the group acquire state run public enterprises like VSNL and CMC from the Government of India? 16. How has the group developed its large subsidiary and associate network and how does it leverage on this network? 17. How has the company engaged in advancing the free market economy and privatization policies in the country?

29

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 1 TATA SONS ( All figures are in INR crores)

Year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Sales 83.9 88.27 129.1 183.06 244.64 392.06 561.54 767.46 1139.81 1733.13 2132.84 3103.18 4152.26 4949.64 5912.08 118.49 157.35 215.65 288.65

Assets 97.62 127.22 164.19 233.72 367.58 622.68 1316.5 1559.11 1933.63 2713.87 3680.41 4912.25 7028.61 8808.65 10822.83 11209.66 12385.36 17247.87 28168.55

PBDITA 22.44 24.13 40.43 59.01 90.45 159.12 241.95 305.15 467.78 863.15 982.7 1158.1 1429.59 1368.93 1870.18 3700.6 1812.78 3943.97 4632.26

PAT 7.11 8.93 17.39 27.19 43.58 92.6 124.56 141.85 273.63 553.21 662.54 713.66 863.29 816.84 1291.96 3273.61 1612.31 3335.94 3779.8

Forex earnings 44.56 49.43 83.61 181.54 132.27 0 0 614.2 967.41 1542.65 1888.91 2914.02 3880.74 4569.18 5547.74 9.54 9.26 13.43 62.2

Source: CMIE Database, 2008

Exhibit 2 Subsidiary Companies of Tata Sons Ltd.


Computational Research Laboratories Ltd. Concept Marketing & Advertising Ltd. e-Next Financials Pvt Ltd. Edwart Investments Ltd. Edwart Investments Pvt. Ltd (Mauritius) Infiniti Retail Ltd. Panatone Finvest Ltd. Tata AIG, Zug Tata AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (Joint Venture) Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. (Joint Venture) Tata Asset Management (Mauritius) Ltd Tata Asset Management Ltd Tata Business Support Pvt. Ltd. Tata Capital Ltd. TRIF Real Estate & Development Pvt. Ltd. TRIF Realty Projects Pvt. Ltd. TRIF Trivandrum Projects Pvt. Ltd. TRIL Airport Development Pvt. Ltd. TRIL Construction Ltd. TRIL Developers Ltd. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Tata America International Corporation Ltd CMC Ltd. CMC Americas Inc. Aponline Ltd. WTI Advanced Technology Ltd. TCS Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Tata Consultancy Services, Malaysia SDN BHD

30

Journal of Case Research Tata Capital Markets Ltd.

vol:1

issue: i Tata Consultancy Services, Japan Ltd. Tata Information Technology (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. TCS Iberoamerica SA TCS Solution Centre S.A. TCS Argentina S.A. TCS DO Brasil Desenvolvimento De Servicos LTDA TCS DE Mexico, SA DE CV TCS Inversiones Chile TCS De Espansa SA TCS Deutschland GMBH TCS, Netherlands BV TCS DO Brasil LTDA TCS, Chile, S.A TCS, Sverige, A.B. TCS, Belgium S.A. TCS Italia SRL

Continued...
TRIF Investments Management Ltd. Tata International AG, Zug Tata Internet Services Ltd. Tata Ltd. (London) Tata Pension Management Ltd. Tata Investment Co. Ltd. Tata Petrodyne Ltd. Tata Securities Ltd. Tata Sky Ltd. (Joint Venture) Tata Teleservices (Maharshtra) Ltd. Tata Teleservices Ltd. Tata Trustee Co. Pvt. Ltd. TCE Consulting Engineers Ltd. Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. Wireless-TT Infoservices Ltd. Tata Realty and Infrastructure Ltd.

Associates:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Exegenix Research Inc. Firstech Solutions Co. Limited Global Information Services Limited Hemisphere Properties India Limited Miracle Entertainment Private Limited Niskalp Energy Limited Rockbourne Holdings B. V. Tata Elxsi Limited Tata Enterprises(Overseas) AG Tata Industries Limited Tata International Limited Tata vInvestment Corporation Limited(Upto 12.02.08) Tata Motors Limited Tata Precesion Indfustries(pte) Ltd. Tata Steel Limited Tata Trustee Company Pvt. Limited(Upto 12.02.08) The Associated Building Company Limited The Tata Power Company Limited Titan International Investments Limited B. V. Titan International Marketing Limited

31

Journal of Case Research 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.

vol:1

issue: i

TKM Overseas Transport Limited, London Trent Limited Vantech Investments Limited Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited Voltas Limited Tata Chemical Limited Tata T/ea Limited Technopolis Knowledge Park Limited Rentalbazaar(India) Limited Casa Dcor Pvt. Ltd.

Investing Parties:
1. 2. Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Sir Ratan Tata Trust

Source: Ninetieth Annual Report 2007-2008

32

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 3 Comparative study of key financial figures of the TATA firms ( Figures are in INR crore) Sales PAT Assets DecDecDecDecDecDecCompany Name 90 Dec-00 08 90 00 Dec-08 90 00 American Express Services India Ltd. 0 -0.8 13.27 Avaya Globalconnect Ltd. 25.49 180.28 573.07 1.62 -5.26 17.21 30.16 189.77 E 2 E Serwiz Solutions Ltd. 167.34 5.06 Emerson Network Power (India) Pvt. Ltd. 127.87 10.4 82.42 Honeywell Automation India Ltd. 276.54 19.28 179.69 I D B I Homefinance Ltd. 0 0 -0.11 29.87 0.5 Infomedia 18 Ltd. 19.75 99.62 146.31 -0.56 10.5 -9.66 24.2 128.52 Itel Industries Ltd. Mcgraw-Hill Education (India) Ltd. N Y K Line (India) Ltd. T H D C Ltd. T R F Ltd. T S R Darashaw Ltd. Tata Advanced Materials Ltd. Tata Asset Mgmt. Ltd. Tata Auto Plastic Systems Ltd. Tata Autocomp Systems Ltd. Tata B P Solar (India) Ltd. Tata Bluescope Steel Ltd. Tata Capital Ltd. Tata Capital Markets Ltd. Tata Ceramics Ltd. Tata Chemicals Ltd. Tata Coffee Ltd. Tata Communications Ltd. Tata Construction & Projects Ltd.

Dec08 404.33 83.56

2792.2 215.7

11.73 36.66

65.39 130.15 0.01 3.15 42.68

371.18 26.82 1.71

0.53 0.72

1.37 4.94 2.84 -7.92 -2.86

42.17 -6.07 28.22

32.3 47.2

186.68 127.89 26.03 24.28 94.91

395.43 97.94 119.91

921.79 0 6.64 1519.42 215.72 7003.69 23.65 0 0 30.11 4223.4 304.55 3301.7 0.27 -6.79 117.29 29.34 840.27 0.77

29 9.21 0.04 0.27 949.18 24.68 304.46 17.05 60.87 3457.6 188.51 8087.6 35.27

967.15 4337.1 6.07 36.07 7542.7 664.95 9776.6

266.15 23.91 317.7 34.04

40.74 1.59 56.88 -2.89

761.82 32.62 626.06 48.77

33

Journal of Case Research


Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Tata Cummins Ltd. Tata Elxsi Ltd. Tata Ficosa Automotive Systems Ltd. Tata Finance Ltd. [Merged] Tata Finance Merchant Bankers Ltd. Tata Hydro-Electric Power Supply Co. Ltd. [Merged] Tata Industries Ltd. Tata Infotech Ltd. [Merged] Tata International Ltd. Tata Internet Services Ltd. Tata Investment Corpn. Ltd. Tata Klockner Indl. Plants Ltd. Tata Korf Engg. Services Ltd. Tata Metaliks Ltd. Tata Metals & Strips Ltd. [Merged] Tata Motors Finance Ltd. Tata Motors Insurance Services Ltd. Tata Motors Ltd. Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. [Merged] Tata Petrodyne Ltd. Tata Pigments Ltd. Tata Power Co. Ltd. Tata Power Trdg. Co. Ltd. Tata Precision Inds. India Ltd. Tata Projects Ltd. Tata Refractories Ltd. Tata Ryerson Ltd. Tata S S L Ltd. [Merged] Tata Securities Ltd.

vol:1
18538 1757.2 401.53

issue: i
4508.76 118.57 52.67 14736 809.82 261.42

124.2 0 0 168.19 564.79 14.72 421.38 1651.23 0 0.11 46.84 10.93 93.76

6.71 56.78 0.21 16.49 98.45 4.26 12.2 5.22 37.21 0.07 0.87 3

79.42 3614.8 5.56 224.33 1450.8 1118.4 255.09 1017.5 276.52 6.78 15.1 67.61

39.12 254.56

5.14 3.52 17.7 0

33.17 149.33 10.04 185.85

40.61 911.58

1185.5 5.14 0

69.63 31.14 44.77

592 6643.8

1905.9 335.33 2.25 419.64

8616.21 47.5 17.05 1403.89

32435 171.8 5920.5

102.54 5.36 0.07 40.95

71.2 -37.08 1.46 238.64

2028.92 54.71 869.9

1554.7 160.51 1.9 556.56

8997.7 88 11.86 3680.7

26152 414.11 13076

12.43 83.78 210.96

172.17 260.69 18.22 654.57 0

1344 584.51 1280 0

0.53 2.01 14.91

9.05 5.33 -1.74 3.65 14.05

43.24 21.66 39.61 0.51

27.37 46.1 121.64

166.7 181.8 85.51 446.59 434.79

1201.5 470.03 509.15 42.38

34

Journal of Case Research


Tata Services Ltd. Tata Sky Ltd. Tata Sons Ltd. Tata Sponge Iron Ltd. Tata Steel Ltd. Tata Tea Ltd. Tata Technodyne Ltd. [Merged] Tata Technologies Ltd. Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd. Tata Teleservices Ltd. Tata Tetley Ltd. Tata Toyo Radiator Ltd. Tata Yazaki Autocomp Ltd. Tata-Scob Dealers Calcutta Ltd. Tatanagar Bricks Ltd. Tatanet Services Ltd. Taulis Pharma Ltd. Tayo Rolls Ltd. Timken India Ltd. V S N L Broadband Ltd. Vashisti Detergents Ltd. [Merged] Wireless T T Info Services Ltd.
Source: Prowess ( CMIE)

vol:1
25.19 88.27 14.63 2066.5 260.68 2132.84 123.65 6156.28 913.65 65.7 63.82 31.72 15.16 59.02 608.98 288.65 515.85 22189 1136.5 277.53 1773.1 5332.8 384.91 290.48

issue: i
0 8.93 3.52 141.58 41.49 662.54 9.37 422.59 124.56 3.85 270.15 -0.19 -7.86 0.03 -863.7 3779.8 95.53 4687.03 312.86 28.41 -125.74 -1826.5 20.1 -5.76 35.87 127.22 37.98 3036.6 272.75 3680.4 109.46 12143 1352.7 31.62 1284.6 23.47 58.65 46.72 537.08 28169 503.33 55161 3104.8 400.65 3443.9 12663 205.32 140.91

21.59 40.82 87.32 167.77 225.93 135.58 244.84 0.69 4.68 15.2 5.51

0.34 6.35 26.22 76.01 158.87 85.29 -30

20.82 168.92

1372.7

35

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 4 TATA Steel Financial : 1931- 2008 (Figures are in INR crore) Gross Block 23.41 24.07 29.25 35.25 42.76 69.39 185.52 211.87 287.86 395.84 550.48 1115.76 2703.29 7408.46 11253.17 16470.71 20746.57 Gross Revenues 5.73 7.55 17.99 22.36 30.23 41.93 87.08 134.01 158.51 287.63 520.86 1285.51 2330.86 5879.96 7810.05 17398.98 22526.81 Net transfer to revenues

Year 1931 1936 1941 1946 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2008

Capital 10.47 10.47 10.47 10.47 10.47 17.34 38.97 38.97 50.01 50.01 62.86 82.74 229.69 367.23 507.97 553.67 6203.31

Investment 0.3 0.63 1.23 2.15 2.81 5.99 8.85 11.66 12.21 11.09 14.01 144.54 571.86 410.94 846.92 4069.96 4103.19

PAT 0.19 1.21 3.04 2.61 2.49 5.81 5.09 9.64 7.42 9.42 26.46 107.68 160.13 565.79 553.44 3506.38 4687.03

0.75 0.7 1.01 4.07 0.52 4.4 2.15 4.59 17.9 90.88 88.79 408.82 335.83 2685.95 3293.48

Dividends 0.19 0.13 2.3 1.82 1.5 1.76 4.65 5.25 5.27 4.83 8.56 20.61 71.34 156.97 217.61 820.43 1393.55

Source: Ninety fifth annual report 2001-02, TATA Steel

Exhibit 5 Financial History of TATA Steel (Figures are in INR crore)


Invest ment (Abroad)

Year

Sales

Assets

PBDIT

PAT

Invest ments

Forex earnings

No. of shares+

Market Cap.

1989 1865.3 2060.65 1990 2066.5 3036.64 1991 2233.4 3504.68 1992 2787.2 4789.08 1993 3352.1 6261.84 1994 3790.9 7347.26 1995 4627.4 7835.11 1996 5854.1 9209.78 1997 6348.5 9920.87 1998 6429.2 11274.2 1999 5516 11466.4 2000 6156.2 12143.3 2001 7196.6 12555.3 2002 7595.4 12809.6 2003 9788.4 13261.5 2004 11918 13933.9 2005 15868 16695.6 2006 17133 19257.4 2007 19766 32095.7 2008 22189 55160.8 Source: Prowess (CMIE)

322.02 404.91 486.09 617.73 664.28 696.6 860.07 1245.15 1339.39 1172.1 1220.85 1432.63 1577.12 1195.51 2200.89 3537.4 6143.55 6152.99 7332.12 8841.29

134.8 141.5 160.1 200.5 119.1 180.8 264.1 565.7 469.2 322 282.2 422.5 553.4 204 1012.3 1746.2 3474.1 3506.3 4222.1 4687

234.4 795.3 571.8 248.7 170 261.6 220.6 410.9 664.9 626 588.8 821.2 850.8 912.7 1201.5 2201.4 2463.2 4069.9 6106.1 4103.1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 1.6 2.8 152.3 972.1 1046.2 1152.3

95.3 147.5 207.6 455.6 641 719.7 550.1 683 666.9 735.9 663.5 750.4 750.7 599.6 1332.1 1501.3 2189.8 2110.1 2103.8 2288.6

368.98 553.47 553.47 553.47 553.47 553.47 553.47 553.47 553.47 580.47 580.47 580.47 608.97 608.97 608.97 730.58 730.58 730.58 730.58 730.59

2988.18 4622.34 10394.41 5805.69 8952.55 7699.8 7224.24 6594.48 4360.42 4816.25 4357.89 4083.48 4355.89 8156.31 14805.12 20886.88 27565.63 40525.27 43763.82

36

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 6 TATA Motors ( Figures are in INR crore) Invest ment (Abroad) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.1 3.1 0 4.38 257.42 255.47 256.15 267.76 301.62

Year 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Sales 1638.51 1905.86 2501.27 3024.36 2875.94 3543.09 5511.46 7636.46 9768.32 7026.5 6317.89 8616.21 7912.36 8641.81 10607.7 15208.7 20217.4 23439.4 31000.7 32434.8

Assets 1191.12 1554.73 1800.53 2740.36 3390.11 3401.16 4262.67 6109.91 8599.67 8940.32 10235.8 8997.68 8892.26 8126.01 8294.13 10192.6 13849.2 16192.1 19575 26151.5

PBDITA 186.25 270.83 370.44 410.8 338.06 434.42 762.15 1091.38 1500.14 1048.02 927.89 1040.64 484.55 787.42 1097.63 1770.65 2155.71 2707.99 3362.32 3512.44

PAT 68.93 102.54 142.05 128.14 30.04 101.34 318.95 505.82 762.36 294.66 97.85 71.2 -500.34 -53.73 300.11 810.34 1236.95 1528.88 1913.46

Invest ments

140.04 303.48 108.58 286.04 175.18 159.09 342.83 660.9 826.57 837.11 1029.38 1203.66 1405.03 1189.92 1271.8 3081.44 2912.06 2015.15 2477 4910.27

Forex earnings 84.91 105.63 134.24 252.34 312.02 379.23 582.98 642.93 675.27 633.88 532.02 611.02 725.31 621.02 477.46 1016.64 1497.85 2384.81 2714.68 2844.12

No. of shares 357.99 358.48 361.75 361.75 361.75 376.25 376.25 382.83 383.07 385.17 385.27 385.37 385.38 385.46 385.51 385.51 385.61 385.61 449.83 449.83

Market Cap. 1740.32 2725.92 4501.32 3074.34 6623.53 7737.78 10860.51 9244.91 4937.91 5630.81 3141.18 2077.92 4216.17 7842.19 15766.55 17880.06 31418.36 28950.72 18858.67

Source: Prowess (CMIE)

Exhibit 7 Financial history of TATA Consultancy Services (Figures are in INR crore) Year Sales Assets PBDITA PAT Invest ment Invest ment (Abroad) 0 0 0 529.37 897.44 1643.23 1633.86 Forex earnings No. of Shares Market. Cap.

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

0 0.25 2.05 8054.57 11239.3 14944.6 18537.5

215.44 266.11 657.89 4752.8 7430.2 10714.9 14736.1

1.54 1.88 17.7 2255.8 3374.25 4520.11 5855.16

1.54 1.02 15.17 1831.42 2716.87 3757.29 4508.76

37.81 37.91 426.4 1408.71 1963.52 3252.09 4509.38

0 0 0 7485.25 10127.08 13785.08 16776.48

978.61 978.61 978.61 978.61 978.61 978.61 978.61

54533.03 65844.53 93944.58 112572.9 77060.92

Source: Prowess ( CMIE)

37

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 8 TATA Power (Figures are in INR crore)


Year Sales Assets PBDITA PAT Forex earning Investment No. of Shares Market Cap.

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

378.1 419.64 474.09 554.79 759.31 951.08 1060.9 1170.8 1192.5 1206.4 1159.7 1403.9 3379.5 3797.8 4279.8 4216.1 3973.1 4560 4704.9 5920.5

486.24 556.56 655.85 963.4 1262.28 1642.22 2177.55 2320.22 2451.9 3022.83 3307.56 3680.7 7680.43 8484.8 8688.23 8000.49 9347.87 9678.18 11493.3 13075.7

51.43 76.73 79.12 98.55 160.21 216.04 298.99 505.61 401.83 426.91 439.62 536.13 1026.97 1341.48 1475.31 1367.3 1270.38 1184.07 1258.72 1529.73

22.68 40.95 34.83 26.48 67.27 95.97 119.51 223 117.93 164.64 166.34 238.64 399.7 508.23 536.42 526.85 551 610.64 696.8 869.9

0 0 0.32 2.02 1.89 0.73 14.5 0.77 0.05 40.1 34.55 53.11 79.61 132.69 67.82 48.59 74.04 82.88 104.31 18.82

12.33 17.27 29.27 44.97 56.07 163.81 495.15 573.22 614.54 1072.73 1208.16 1389.31 1582.93 2276.12 2451.83 2728.83 3502.92 3412.17 3570.15 4630.09

197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 197.89 207.79 217.39 220.71 220.78 221.38 221.38 221.42

178.7 338.36 369.73 824.8 1578.61 1330.52 1621.4 1422.48 1159.91 919.33 927.44 2418.37 2231.76 3292.51 6426.3 7965.73 10326.82 15840.42 24103.45

Source: Prowess ( CMIE)

Exhibit 9 Tata Communications ( Figures are in INR crores)


Year Sales PBDITA PAT Assets Investments Investment (Abroad) Forex earnings

No. of shares

Market CAP.

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

317.7 376.11 598.23 734.92 2911.05 3560.48 4432.32 5209.27 6142.29 6857.94 7003.69 7299.42 6509.98 4540.28 3168.05 3303.04 3791.17 3757.32 3301.73

132.43 177.82 277.91 309.02 382.42 617.37 757 888.8 1465.64 1994.28 1572.39 2683.86 2227.7 1404.35 716.18 1298.02 1047.9 1110.87 790.89

56.88 78.58 104.14 112.38 176.1 303.07 409.56 504.74 967.92 1324.95 840.27 1778.83 1407.05 780.07 377.66 756.18 479.54 468.56 304.46

626.06 631.04 904.08 1335.08 2131.86 2194.7 3178.96 5195.32 6713.89 8828.43 8087.55 10069.3 7640.14 7643.82 6876.68 7683.89 8227.53 8615.61 9776.59

4.89 19.76 0.41 0.41 0.41 3.45 125.26 313.77 375.95 574.5 115.82 110.65 366.29 655.87 2094.11 1223.21 2499.34 2680.85 2325.28

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101.44 101.45 357.09 375.43 344.58 54.66 317.66 414.65 417.11

122.91 129.32 175.44 300.4 1625.89 2120.12 2888.96 3397.7 4022.53 4737.62 4817.11 4867.3 4177.96 2849.95 1477.71 1951.89 1712.01 1759.12 1035.27

285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285 285

0 0 0 5205.26 8825.36 8860.36 7460.68 10298.4 8167.79 4173.09 3067.12 5008.95 8172.36 11565.9 13364.1 13537

Source: Prowess (CMIE)

38

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 10 TATA Chemicals (Figures are in INR crore)


Investments Investment (Abroad) Forex earnings No. Of shares Market Cap

Year

Sales

Assets

PBDITA

PAT

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

256.83 266.15 299.43 348.42 414.75 504.38 770.17 1515.37 1598.52 1643.53 1461.96 1519.42 1470.89 1397.14 1614.08 2633.88 3098.97 3639.58 4124.66 4223.4

576.95 761.82 1055.61 1106.33 1674.76 2401.07 2808.18 3168.58 3363.93 3442.56 3527.33 3457.58 3510.5 3501.06 3181.19 3765.91 4485.82 4756.04 4785.31 7542.73

103.37 121.95 131.6 165.87 188.86 365.52 561.89 769.53 660.39 681.5 549.31 473.54 495.76 461.57 521.32 553.77 620.11 686.63 826.92 1327.04

35.79 40.74 44.45 59.75 74.95 276.58 286.65 392.31 249.96 288.63 181.67 117.29 164.95 126.82 196.58 220.53 340.55 353.03 444.21 949.18

227.64 296.62 407.4 351.96 377.78 295.16 269.74 350.88 259.12 258.15 262.58 208.44 428.22 555.68 569.02 626.94 938.74 713.74 1350.28 3741.4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166.26 575.02 3320.32

4.04 4.78 1.93 4.08 9.68 9.2 3.68 14.95 23.72 19.98 2.05 5.46 22.1 20.75 53.18 64.25 85.27 94.39 113.42 91.94

180.63 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 215.11 226.65 233.96 234.72 235.16 235.16 235.16

636.91 596.59 1535.28 2601.47 5048.7 3998.01 3939.56 2984.08 2178.4 1270.62 763.58 908.98 1550.37 2623.46 3844.77 4974.49 5667.27 6608.92

Source: Prowess (CMIE)

Year 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Sales 223.3 260.68 294.33 348.04 380.53 415.91 399.32 519.69 692.19 871.9 876.2 913.65 824.44 762.82 748.43 777.53 893.27 971.01 1056.4 1136.5

Assets 203.25 272.75 359.28 419.74 475.22 517.29 546.74 644.58 754.95 832.44 943.17 1352.65 1338.51 1422.16 1471.78 1432.55 1540.2 1703.53 2723.47 3104.81

Exhibit 11 Tata Tea ( Figures are in INR crore) Invest ment Invest (Abroad) PAT ments PBDITA 58.67 36.66 53.37 0 88.47 41.49 73.34 0 106.13 51.57 133.82 0 110.14 52.86 130.34 0 115.43 54.23 100.96 0 115.86 55.88 133.31 0 108.46 58.36 153.75 0 106.05 46.08 181.58 0 131.34 58.61 184.3 0 193.15 102.17 177.84 0 235.22 128.76 231.12 0 220.12 124.56 629.15 0 184.61 100.21 621.91 440.88 141.19 71.96 738.4 506.69 150.75 70.6 748.47 506.69 161.33 91.53 835.45 512.09 198 128.81 865.85 501.03 266.38 186.93 1106.83 512.09 413.75 306.57 2045.92 1427.95 459.28 312.86 2193.78 1438.91

Forex earnings 34.31 35.5 34.11 51.62 95.96 100.24 79.11 111.59 225.29 281.35 143.99 98.05 66.74 91.7 133.31 118.69 129.41 191.62 179.83

No. of shares 56219857 56219857 56219857 56219857 56219857 56219857 56219857 56219857 56219857 56219857 59029857 59029857 61839857 61839857 61839857 61839857 61839857 61839857 61839857 61839857

Market Cap. 447.56 688.82 1200.27 1914.39 2251.26 1583.01 1306.13 1630.59 1655.35 2257.89 1747.5 1116.98 956.81 1260.27 2185.74 3755.39 4536.33 4651.5 4555.24

Source: Prowess ( CMIE)

39

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 12: Tata Investment Corpn. Ltd. (Figures are in INR crore) Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Sales 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Assets 76.53 92.72 106.67 137.41 160.47 171.43 204.49 216.52 276.52 287.62 342.33 359.6 468.96 526.35 656.76 785.65 911.58 PBDITA 7.13 11.09 16.45 25.77 26.35 28.38 26.27 28.24 43.14 45.11 47.21 52.87 88.08 116.85 165.15 195.91 200.33 PAT 3.87 6.26 9.04 16.92 17.78 19.81 20.06 22.68 37.21 41.13 41.34 45.82 80.56 112.38 163.14 181.65 185.85 Invest ments 52.67 82.85 94.79 109.09 127.35 135.87 170.84 188.48 268.82 273.22 300.03 316.93 455.02 516.52 624.62 753.59 888.19 Forex earnings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.57 0.17 0 0 0.18 0.04 0.33 1.92 7.05 No. of shares 22973592 22973592 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 34460388 Market Cap. 228.91 169.17 355.5 263 223.08 198.29 144.94 145.8 143.36 131.56 147.12 315 474.17 931.1 1378.87 1631.86 1589.02

Source: Prowess (CMIE)

Exhibit 13 Indian Hotels Ltd. ( Figures are in INR crore) Year 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Sales 115.85 138.25 156.28 203.22 238.14 293.72 372.5 524.3 576.82 595.65 603.28 604.17 688.01 581.03 569.57 668.59 848.04 1116.62 1541.43 1765.17 PBDITA 27.8 33.49 36.7 58.14 71.27 98.14 135.83 241.14 253.21 221.57 201.15 208.48 243.07 212.27 162.94 180.79 250.6 381.63 664.16 763.15 PAT 9.38 11.53 9.03 21.92 33.54 55.18 82.11 140.57 146.88 137.96 119.14 113.23 116.79 80.7 40.48 60.65 105.86 183.78 322.39 377.46 Assets 167 203.6 237.62 273.39 320.03 367.69 596.54 948.64 1093.34 1164.87 1232.23 1563.67 1759.17 1923.2 1926.37 2626.79 2609.38 2745.46 3354.63 3796.96 Invest ments 9.34 11.19 12.37 13.76 16.93 32.54 36.04 142.09 214.8 218.09 260.35 338.25 422.33 541.54 575.5 608.51 610.87 660.43 1109.6 1162.58
Investment ( Abroad)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87.1 113.84 114.65 114.65 125.98 125.98 125.98 531.94 531.94

No. of Shares* 45.11 45.11 45.11 46.41 52.01 54.66 55.36 56.66 58.41 58.41 586.63 586.63 602.85 602.85 602.85 602.85 723.41 723.41 723.41 723.41

Market CAP.

Source: Prowess ( CMIE )

40

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 14 Tata Teleservices Ltd. (Figures are in Rs. Cr.) Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Sales 84.2 147.82 268.07 794.86 1351.26 2582.57 4532.16 5332.84 Assets 767.88 1433.28 3219.58 6133.86 9177.16 11518.02 11423.86 12662.96 PBDITA -3.76 4.3 -72.41 -185.13 -614.64 -429.62 -238.4 260.32 PAT -148.05 -195.43 -381.57 -786.4 -1664.07 -1878.21 -2062.52 -1826.51 Investments 26.68 104.03 585.43 542.85 575.69 620.59 506.17 553.17

Source: Prowess ( CMIE)

41

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 15 Sir Dorabji Tata Trust


Project/ Activities Indian Institute of Science (IISc) Sir Ratan Tata Department of Social Sciences Tata Institute of Social Science Tata Memorial Hospital Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) International Institute of Population Studies (IIPS) Demographic Centre for Training & Research Atomic Energy Training School (now Bhabha Atomic Research Centre) Tata Management Training Centre (TMTC) National Centre for Performing Arts Tata Theatre National Institute of Advanced Studies (NAS) JRD Tata Ecotechnology Centre Location year Nature/scope Bangalore 1911 Donated initial fund and land for the set up the institute. London 1912 Through Sir Ratan Tatas benefaction the centre was set up at London School of Economics (LSE), London Mumbai 1936 Social research & community studies/development Mumbai 1941 Advanced research for cancer. Mumbai 1945 Set up under guidance of J.R.D. Tata for research in mathematics & physics Mumbai 1956 Set up by United Nations, Government of India & Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai 1956 Government of India & Dorabji Tata Trust for study of issues related to population Mumbai 1957 Centre for Atomic energy research (where most of the scientists were recruited from TIFR in the initial days) Pune 1964 Train employees from Tata organization and other organizations including PSUs. Mumbai 1966 Activities of art & cultural significant Mumbai Part of National Centre for Performing Arts Mumbai 1988 Institution which would conduct advanced research in multidisciplinary areas. Chennai 1996 Set up by Sir Dorabji Tata Trust at MS Swami Nathan Research Foundation, Chennai Bangalore 1997 Set up at IISc for advanced studies for medical research and tropical disease control Gujarat Training activities for the visually impaired people (Donation of INR 2,00,000 to National Association of the Blind) Kolkata 2009 Medical Centre & Research

Sir Dorabji Tata Centre for Research in Tropical Disease Tata Agricultural and Rural Training Centre for the Blind (TACEB) Tata Medical Centre (To be opened)

Source: 1. Lala R.M., Beyond the Last Blue Mountain; Viking Penguin Books India (P) Ltd.1992 2. www.dorabjitatatrust.org (accessed on May 7, 2009)

42

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 16 Tata Trusts


Sir Ratan Tata Trust From its inception in 1919, the Sir Ratan Tata Trust (SRTT) largely made grants in Bombay. Education, health and support for allied trusts were the mainstay of institutional grant making, with a few grants also being made for the promotion of arts and heritage, womens development, rural development, etc. Few of the early ventures of the Trust were the Sir Ratan Tata Industrial Institute, National Metallurgical Laboratory at Jamshedpur, and to the establishment of the Tata Memorial Centre. Notable grants and donations until were for: The establishment of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS). Apart from concentrating on funding the establishment of prestigious and pioneering institutions, the Trust responded to requests from individuals and institutions, on an ad-hoc basis. JN Tata Endowment The JN Tata Endowment was set up in 1892 by the founder of the Tata group, Jamsetji Tata, to encourage young people to take up higher studies at some of the best universities in the world. It is the first Tata benefaction in the field of education, and possibly the first of its kind in Asia. Annually, the endowment selects around 120 scholars for higher studies abroad. Over the years, several JN Tata scholars have distinguished themselves in various walks of life.The endowment awards only loan scholarships. However, the selected scholars may also qualify for a gift award.

Other Trusts sponsored by Tata Family Trust Lady Tata Memorial Trust Lady Meherbai D Tata Education Trust JRD Tata Trust Jamsetji Tata Trust Tata Education Trust Tata Social Welfare Trust RD Tata Trust JRD & Thelma J. Tata Trust Year of Establishment 1932 1932 Activities Advanced research in the diseases of the blood & leukemia research. Grants scholarships to young Indian women graduates for pursuing higher studies abroad in the field of social work and public health. Developmental issues, medical and educational grants. Grants are made across the five sectors of Management of Natural Resources, Livelihood, Health, Education and a range of issues covered as Social Development Initiatives. Promoting the welfare, education, health, rehabilitation and uplift of the women of

1944 1974 1990 1990 1990 1991

India Source: http://www.dorabjitatatrust.org/allied_trust (accessed on May 9, 2009)

43

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 17 Shareholders of Tata Sons


Shareholder 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Shapoor Mistry Sterling Investment Corp - Shapoorji Pallonji Group Cyrus Investments - Shapoorji Pallongi Group Ratan Tata Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Sir Ratan Tata Trust Tata Investment Corp Sarvajanik Seva Trust RD Tata Trust Tata Social Welfare Trust Tata Education Trust JRD Tata Trust Tata Power Tata Tea Indian Hotels Tata Industries Tata Chemicals Kalimati Investment Co. Tata International Ltd Tata Motors Piloo Tata Jimmy Tata Farhad Choksey Simone Tata Noel Tata Virendra Singh Chauhan-Chhota Udaipur MK Tata Trust Others Total Number of Shares No of shares 108 40,319 33,925 3,368 113067 95,211 326 396 8,838 15,076 15,075 16,200 5,673 1,755 4,500 2,295 10,237 12,375 155 12,375 487 157 157 2,011 2,055 1 2,421 5,583 404,146 % Holding 0.03 9.98 8.39 0.83 27.98 23.56 0.08 0.10 2.19 3.73 3.73 4.01 1.40 0.43 1.11 0.57 2.53 3.06 0.04 3.06 0.12 0.04 0.04 0.50 0.51 0.00 0.60 1.38 100.00

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=332876 <accessed May 9, 2009>

44

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 18: A Section of Tata family tree


NUSSERWANI R. TATA (husband of Jeevanbai Tata) DADABHOY TATA (brother of Jeevanbai Bhikhibai husband of Bhikhibai)

JAMSETJI NUSSERWANJI TATA Founder of the House of Tata Husband of Hiabai Daboo

RATANBAI TATA Wife of Edulji Bamji

MANECKBAI TATA Wife of Kharsedji Tata

VIRBAIJI TATA Wife of BapujiSaklatvala

JERBAI TATA Wife of Dorabji Saklatvala R.D. TATA (Ratanji DadaBhoy Tata) husband of Suzanne (Sooni) Briere

SIR DORABJI TATA Husband of Meherbai Bhaba

DHUNBAI TATA

SIR RATAN TATA Husband of Navajbai Sett

KAEKOBAD SAKLATVALA Husband of Sehra Bardi

SIR NOWROJI SAKLATVALA Husband of Goolbai Batliwala

adopted

MINOCHER TATA Husband of Piloo Dastur

NAVAL H. TATA

SYLLA TATA (Lady Dinshaw Petit) wife of Sir Dinshaw Petit

J.R.D. TATA Husband of Thelma Vicaji

RODABEH TATA

DORAB TATA

JIMMY TATA

Husband of Soonoo Commisariat

Husband of Simone Dunoyer

RATAN TATA

JIMMY TATA

NOEL TATA

JAMSETJI NUSSERWANJI TATA (1887-1904) SIR DORABJI TATA (1904-1932) SIR NOWROJI SAKLATVALA (1932-1938) J.R.D. TATA (1938-1991) RATAN TATA (Since 1991) Years mentioned indicate the period of Championship

45

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibits 19 Fostering the brand Tata: Heights attained by Tata Chairmen


J.R.D. Tata: Award/ Recognition First solo flight* between India & England International Man of Management Padma Vibhushan Honorary Air Commodore Tony Jannus Award Commander of the Legion of Honour Gold Medal Daniel Guggenheim Medal Award Bharat Ratna U.N. Population Award Special Award Release of Postal Stamp in his memory Year 1930 1953 1955 1966 1979 1982 1985 1988 1992 1992 1992 1994 From Courtesy from Aga Khan National Association of Foremen Government of India Indian Air Force The Greater tampa chamber of commerce French Government Federation Aeronautique Internationale Museum of Flight Government of India United Nations International Planned Parenthood Federation Government of India

N.B. *First Indian to be Awarded Pilots License in February, 1929

Ratan N. Tata: Award/ Recognition Padma Bhusan Padma Vibhushan Honorary doctorate in business administration Honorary doctorate in technology Honorary doctorate in science Honorary fellowship Year 2000 2008 From Government of India Government of India Ohio State University Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok University of Warwick London School of Economics 46

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 20 Tata Group initiations in Labour welfare


Welfare Policy/ Scheme Eight hour working day Free Medical aid Establishment of welfare Department Formation of works committee for handling complains & grievances Leave with pay Workers provident fund Scheme Workmens Accident Compensation Scheme Technical Institution for Training Maternity Benefit Profit Sharing Bonus Retiring Gratuity Introduction by Tata group 1912 1915 1917 1919 Enforced by Law 1948 1948 1948 1947 Legal Measure Factories Act Employees State Insurance Act Factories Act Industrial disputes Act

1920 1920 1920 1921 1928 1934 1937

1948 1952 1924 1961 1946 1965 1972

Factories Act Employees Provident Fund Act Workmens Compensation Act Apprentices Act Bihar Maternity Benefit Act Bonus Act Payment of Gratuity Act

Source: Elankumaran S, Seal R. & Hshmi A.;Transcending Transformation: Enlightening Endeavors at Tata Steel; Journal of Business Ethics (2005) 59: 109-119

47

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 21 Time line of TATA Group

Source: www.palgrave-journals.com/.../8400198f1.gif (as on April 14, 2009)

48

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 22 Milestones by TATA Group Foundation: 1868-1931


1868 Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata starts a private trading firm, laying the foundation of the Tata group.

1874 1902

The Central India Spinning, Weaving and Manufacturing Company was set up.

The Indian Hotels Company is incorporated to set up the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower, India's first luxury hotel, which opened in 1903.

1907 1910

The Tata Iron and Steel Company (now Tata Steel) is established to set up India's first iron and steel plant in Jamshedpur. The plant started production in 1912. Sets up its first office overseas, Tata Limited in London.

The Tata Hydro-Electric Power Supply Company is set up. Andhra Valley Power Supply Company was established in 1917 and Tata Power in 1919.

1917

Tata Oil Mills Company being established to make soaps, detergents and cooking oils. The company was sold to Hindustan Unilever in 1984.

1919

Insurance business unit, New India Assurance was set up (nationalized in 1956).

Consolidation (1932-1989)

1932 1939 1944

Tata Airlines, a division of Tata Sons is established.

Tata Chemicals is established.

Tata Sons set up its overseas office in USA.

49

Journal of Case Research vol:1 issue: i 1945 Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company (renamed Tata Motors in 2003) is established. Tata Industries is created for the promotion and development of hi-tech industries. 1952

Setting up of Lakme brands of cosmetics. The company was sold to Hindustan Unilever in 1997.

1954

India's major marketing, engineering and manufacturing organization, Voltas, is established.

1962 1968

Tata Finlay (now Tata Tea) is established. Tata Exports (now Tata International) is established.

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), India's first software services company, is established as a division of Tata Sons.

1971

Tata Precision Industries established in Singapore, is founded to design and manufacture precision engineering products.

1984 1995

Tata Electric Companies commissioned first thermal power unit at Trombay.

Tata Quality Management Services institutes the JRD QV Award, modelled on the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Value Award of the United States, laying the foundation of the Tata Business Excellence Model.

Expansion (1990 Onwards)


1996 1998 Tata Tele services (TTSL) is established.

Tata Indica, India's first indigenously designed and manufactured car launched by Tata Motors.

1999 2000

The new Tata group corporate mark and logo are launched.

Tata Tea acquires the Tetley group, UK. This is the first major acquisition of an international brand by an Indian business group.

2001 50

Journal of Case Research vol:1 issue: i Tata AIG is set up in a joint venture between the Tata group and American International Group Inc (AIG). 2002

Tata Sons acquires state run telecom player VSNL (renamed as Tata Communications).

2004

Tata Motors is listed in New York Stock Exchange, the second group company to do so after VSNL. Tata Motors acquires the heavy vehicles unit of Daewoo Motors, South Korea. TCS goes public in July 2004 in the largest private sector initial public offering (IPO) in the Indian market, raising nearly $1.2 billion.

2005

Tata Steel acquires Singapore-based steel company Nat Steel. VSNL (now Tata Communications) acquired Tyco Global Network, making it one of the world's largest providers of submarine cable bandwidth. The Taj acquires a hotel run by Starwood, Sydney (renamed Blue) and takes over management of The Pierre, NY.

2006 2007 2008

Tata Sky satellite television service launched across the country. Foundation stone for the Tata Medical Centre unveiled in Kolkata.

Tata Steel acquires the Ango-Dutch steel company Corus. TCS inaugurates TCS China. Computational Research Laboratories, a division of Tata Sons, develops Eka, one of the fastest supercomputers in the world and the fastest in Asia. The Taj acquires Campton Place Hotel in San Francisco.

Tata Motors acquires the Jaguar and Land Rover brands from the Ford Motor Company. Tata Chemicals acquires General Chemical Industrial Products Inc.

Source: http://www.tata.com/htm/Group_milestone.htm (as on April9, 2009)

51

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i Bombay 28 September 1944

Exhibit 23: Letter to G.D. Birla*


Dear Mr. Birla, I was talking the order day to a highly placed friend who has just returned from England. He confirmed that our proposed visit had aroused much interest in England and then said that he had gathered the impression that it would be to our advantage to go there, if not orders in our pockets, at least with specific and clear ideas of what India would want in the way of machinery and equipment in the immediate post war period. If we were found to have come merely on an exploratory and study mission, much less attention would be given to us and the usefulness of our work would be reduced. Although we shall obviously not be in a position to negotiate large purchases or contracts on behalf of India as a whole, I think there is some force in what he said. In this connection you will have read in the papers of the formation in England, under the initiative of Sir George Schuster, of an individual group comprising fifty industries from the Midlands, to prepare for our visit. It is clear from this and other things that have appeared in the press from time to time that when we get there we shall be faced by people and interests who will have taken the trouble to organize themselves to meet us, and ready to talk business. I feel, therefore, that it is important that we should also be prepared in advance, with facts and ideas, when we meet these gentlemen.

Exhibit 24
Bombay 14 November 1947 Dear Mr. Birla, As you may know, the Government of India have recently approved a joint scheme between themselves and Air-India, for the inauguration of an international service between India and UK. A similar scheme is under consideration in connection with the shipping industry. There are other projects which Government have in view, in some of which it would appear to be Governments present intention to set up industrial enterprises of there own, either managed wholly by themselves or in conjunction with private interests. All this raises large questions of policy and would have a profound influence on industrial development in the country. I think it is essential, therefore, for a few of us confer together with a view to arriving, if possible, at some uniform views on the general principles involved. I am writing the same letter to Sir Sri Ram and Kasturbhai Lalbhai, and I am also verbally approaching Mr. Walchand Hirachand, Dharamsey Khatau, Krisnaraj Thakersey and Bhagwandas Mehta, the present Chairman of Millowners Association. As all of us, except you and Sir Sri Ram are permanently in Bombay, and as Mr. Kasturbhai visits Bombay every week, I would like, if you agree with my suggestion, to arrange an early meeting in Bombay. I shall therefore appreciate it if will let me know when it would be convenient for you to meet in Bombay. It would be advantageous if you and Sir Sri Ram could agree between you as to a suitable date. I suggest it should be towards the end of this month or beginning of December. With kind regards, Yours sincerely, J.R.D. Tata
* Chairman, Birla Group of Industries Source: Mmbro A., Letters J.R.D. Tata; Rupa & Co. 2004

52

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 25 Network of Tata Sons & Directors of Tata group


Ratan Tata: Chairman of the Government of Indias Investment Commission and a Member of the Prime Ministers Council on Trade and Industry, Member, National Hydrogen Energy Board National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council

International Investment Council set up by the President of the Republic of South Africa

UK Prime Ministers Business Council for Britain Member of the International Advisory Council of Singapores Economic Development Board Asia-Pacific Advisory Committee to the board of directors of the New York Stock Exchange International advisory boards of the Mitsubishi Corporation, American International Group, JP Morgan Chase and Rolls Royce Boards of Fiat SpA and Alcoa President of the court of the Indian Institute of Science
Chairman of the Council of Management of the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research

Board of trustees of Cornell University and the University of Southern California Foundation Board of the Ohio State University Programme Board of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's India AIDS Initiative J.J. Irani: National president of the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) for 1992-93 Co-chairman of the Indo-British Partnership during 1993-1998 Former president of the Indian Institute of Metals President of the All India Management Association (AIMA) during 1988-89 Chairman of the Board of Governors of the XLRI, Jamshedpur, 1993-2003 Chairman of the Society and Board of Governors of the IIM, Lucknow Member, Scientific Advisory Committee to the Cabinet (SAC-C), Government of India. Former chairman of Expert committee; to draft the new Companies Act Working groups for iron and steel for the 6th, 7th and 8th national Five-Year Plans Member of the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE). President of the Asian Association of Management Organisations (2004-2007)

Syamal Gupta: Honorary consul general of Namibia in India President's advisory council in Tanzania, Uganda and Ghana Member of Commonwealth Business Council, London. On the board of the IIM, Kozhikode and the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, London

53

Journal of Case Research Ishaat Hussain

vol:1

issue: i

Member, SEBI committees on insider trading and primary capital markets & CII Arun Kumar Gandhi: Member, Securities and Exchange Board of India's takeover panel exemption committee Member, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India's accounting standards board.

Exhibit 26 Business Policies those regulated Iron & Steel Industry of India
Year 1948 Policy Industrial policy Resolution Brief about the policy State run policy & regulation for industrial development Limited opportunity for private players in Iron & Steel industry and mineral sector; where ever the government feel cooperation of such activity is needed for National growth Second five years plan is eventful for Iron & Steel industry; 3 PSUs were set up. Private players are given financial support and other incentives to increase the production. Tata Steel has increased the production from 8 lakh tones to 15 lakhs during this period. Iron & Steel industry is scheduled in A-category. Limited growth opportunity for private player Fello-alloys & tool steels are scheduled in Bcategory. Private players will be allowed to enter Coal & Ignite, Mining of iron ore, chrome ore are scheduled in A category. Solely state affair. No private players would be entertained to participate

1949 19561961

Mineral Concession Rules Second Five years plan

1956

Industrial policy Resolution

1957

1960 1969

Mines & Minerals Regulation & Development Act. Mineral Concession Rules Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP) Industrial Policy Statement

1970

Regulation of mining license except atomic minerals and minor minerals Participation of private players in Schedule A industries like Iron & Steel are under scrutiny of the state. Licensing policy will be encouraged with strict follow up of the MRTP Acts. Large business houses are allowed to participate in Metallurgical industries including fello allays, steel castings & forgings and special steels industries. 54

Journal of Case Research 1977 Industrial Policy Statement

1980

Industrial Policy Statement

1982

Industrial Licensing Policy

vol:1 issue: i Growth of private players will be allowed under MRTP Act,1969 Limited access to foreign investments (Maximum stake holding capacities up to 40%) Government recognizes that , it would be desirable to allow private players to mmet the production target in consonance with national objectives. All incentives given to industry must be performance orientated. Large industrial houses are allowed to set up industries in core sectors including iron & steel sector. Private players and multi-nationals will also be permitted to set up units outside the core sector if the units are predominately export oriented.

1988 1993

Mineral Conservation and Development Rule National Mineral Policy

1995

Union Budget of India

2008

National Mineral Policy

Foreign firms can hold up to 50% of ownership Facilitates better scope for private player to participate in post liberalized economy. Import duty rates on ferrous & non-ferrous metals will be reduced to 40%. Other items included by the Iron & Steel sector sees heavy discount in tax structure. Policy to attract more foreign investment in development of mining sector Private ownership is encouraged by softening of License guideline

55

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 27 TATA Group listed firms during financial year 2000


Tata Sponge Iron Tata Metaliks Tata Elxi Ltd.
2.87 18.98 17.88 19.17 78.17 14.17 4.68

39.74 46.66

Tata Iron & Steel Co.


9.13

Tata Motors ltd.

Tata Infotech. Ltd.

Tata Finance

Tata Power Co. ltd. Tata Industries


8.69 9.54

Tata Telecom

Tata construction & Projects ltd.


11.03
90.73

Tata Sons ltd.


87.03

Tata SSL ltd.


1

2.4

31.75

Tata Advance Material ltd.

15.7 15.06

Tata Investment Corp. ltd.


15.37 4.21 9.81

Tata Coffee ltd.

50.59

Tata Tea Tata Honeywell


9.8

7.68

Tata Chemicals

Source: Cross Holding Strategy to increase control: Case of the Tata group by Ram Kumar Kakani & Tejas Joshi

56

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 28 TATA Group listed firms during financial year 2005


Tata Sponge Iron Tata Metaliks
19.8 2.87 2.06 78.17 17.88 38.15

39.74 46.66

Tata Iron & Steel Co.

4.66 8.61 14.17

Tata Motors ltd.

Tata Elxi Ltd.

Tata Infotech. Ltd.

Tata Finance Tata construction & Projects ltd.


14.7

Tata Power Co. ltd. Tata Industries


28.74 80.7 12.41 9.54

Tata Consultancy Services Voltas


12.9 2.4

Tata Sons ltd.


31.75

23.8

Indian Hotels

3.11

Kalimati Investment Co.


8.74

1.07 1.66 15.06 15.37 7.15 8

Tata Investment Corp. ltd.


1.16

Titan Industries Tata Coffee ltd.

50.56 3.38

Tata Tea

7.68

Tata Chemicals

Source: Cross Holding Strategy to increase control: Case of the Tata group by Ram Kumar Kakani & Tejas Joshi

57

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 29 Extent of Tata Sons Ltds interest in the subsidiary (Figures are in %)
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. APOnline Ltd. C-Edge Technologies Ltd. CMC Ltd CMC Americas Inc. Diligenta Ltd. Exegenix Canada Inc. WTI Advanced Technology Ltd. TCS Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd. TCS, Japan Ltd. TCS, Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
Tata Information Technology(Shanghai) Ltd.

TCS, Belgium SA TCS, Netherlands B.V. TCS, Italia SRL TCS Sverige AB TCS, Deutschland GmbH IT Consulting Co. Tata America International Co. TCS Iberoamerica S.A. TCS, Uruguay TCS DO Brasil LTDS TCS Do Brasil S.A. TCS Espana S.A. TCS, Argentina S.A. TCS Inversions Chile Limitada TCS Chile S.A. TCS De Mexico S.A. De C.V. Tata Infotech Deutschland GmbH Tata Infotech(Singapore) Pte. Ltd. TCS FNS Pty. Ltd. Swedish Indian IT Resources AB TCS Luxemboug SA TCS Portugal MP Online Ltd. TCS, Switzerland TCS China CO. PT TCS Indonesia Tata Pensoin Management Ltd. Tata Asset Management (Mauritius) Ltd. Ewart Investment Pvt. Ltd. E-Next Financial Pvt. Ltd. Tata Capital Markets Ltd. Tata Investment corporation Ltd.

74.81 66.58 38.15 38.24 74.81 56.86 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 Nil 74.81 74.81 74.81 Nil 74.81 74.81 74.06 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 Nil 74.81 74.81 66.58 74.81 54.03 74.81 67.91 67.91 100 100 100 56.56

TCS Financial Australia Pty Ltd TCS BPO Chile S.A. TCS Financial solutions Australia Financial Network Services (Europe) Plc. TKS Services S.A. Quartz Software Technology SA TKS Banking Services S.A. TCS France SAS PT Network Srevices Financial Network Services(Africa) Ltd. Financial Network Services (HongKong) Sycrom S.A. Pentacrom S.A. Pentacrom Services S.A. Custodia de Documentos Financial Network Services Malaysia TCS S.A. Wireless TT Info Servoices Ltd. Ewart Investments Ltd. Tata Housing Development Co. Ltd. Concept Marketing & Advertising Ltd. Tata Capital Ltd. TCE Consulting Engineers Ltd. Tata AIG Life Insurance Co. Panatone Finvest Ltd. Tata Business process services Tata Asset Management Ltd. Tata Teleservices Ltd. Tata Teleservices (Maharshtra) Ltd. Tata Internet Services Ltd. Tata Sky Ltd. Tata Petrodyne Ltd. Tata International AG Tata AG, Zug Tata Ltd., London Infiniti Retail Ltd. Computaional Research Laboratories Ltd. Finanacial Network Services Co. ltd. Tata Securities Ltd. Tata Trustee Company pvt. Ltd. TCS Morocco SARL AU TCS (Africa) pte. Ltd. TCS South Africa TCS Financial Management LLC 58

74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 Nil Nil Nil 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 74.81 Nil Nil 74.81 74.81 74.81 45.50 99.74 99.74 100 100 74 60.01 100 67.91 45.50 20.76 45.50 70 100 100 100 100 100 100 74.81 100 100 74.81 74.81 44.81 74.81

Source: Ninetieth Annual Report 2007-08, Tata Sons Ltd.

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 30 Book Values of Tata Sons Ltd.; Quoted & Un-quoted investment (Figures in INR Crore)
Quoted Investment: Name of the group company Equity Share- Fully Paid Indian Hotels Co. Ltd. Tata Chemical Ltd. Tata Investment Corporation Ltd. Tata Communication Ltd. Tata Steel Tata Motors+ Tata Power Corporation Ltd. Tata Tea Ltd. Convertible Preference ShareFully Paid Tata Steel Subsidiary Companies Equity Shares-Fully Paid Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Tata Investment Corporation Ltd.
Tata TeleServices (Maharashtra) Ltd. 2008 92.27 364.80 855.27 5095.50 1086.92 1050.64 604.57 2007 68.50 354.74 147.74 855.27 2621.61 1086.92 469.78 400.44 2006 51.52 206.90 34.81 299.65 1144.53 1057.41 469.78 182.10 2005 51.52 133.98 34.81 52.06 1095.75 897.41 469.78 182.10 2004 51.52 78.15 34.81 52.06 1095.75 887.93 469.78 182.10 2003 51.52 78.15 34.81 44.10 1095.75 741.74 469.78 182.10 2002 51.52 70.14 30.64 1095.75 741.74 469.78 182.10 2001 44.01 70.14 26.47 1095.58 460.26 182.10 2000 41.68 70.14 22.82 1013.23 156.72 116.52 1995 31.06 21.54 1990 0.86 9.15.

35.38 21.56 1.73

14.97 2.94 0.07 1.73

1717.91

143.44 448.66 704.03

148.22 456.53

152.12

48.03

Un-Quoted Investment: Name of the group company Equity Share- Fully Paid Tata Industries Ltd. Subsidiary Investment (Equity Share- Fully Paid) Panatone Finvest Ltd.

2008 240.39

2007 240.39

2006 240.39

2005 240.39

2004 240.39

2003 152.09

2002 152.09

2001 148.76

2000 144.49

1995 10.05

1990

750.45

750.45

750.45

59

Journal of Case Research Tata AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Tata Capital Ltd.* Tata Ltd., London Tata Realty and Infrastructure Ltd. Tata Sky Ltd. (Joint Venture) Tata Teleservices Ltd. Preference Shares-Fully Paid Tata Capital Ltd. Tata Realty and Infrastructure Ltd.

vol:1
643.80 570.03 652.67 725.00 672.69 3391.35 404.78 0.03 0.16 15.00 456.48 3000.0 16 1,000.0 330.78 0.03 0.16 156.16 2948.4 16

issue: i
92.50 0.16 0.03 0.16 0.16

1394 16 16

* (Formerly primal investments and Finance Ltd.)


+ Earlier Tata Engineering & Locomotives ltd Source: Ninetieth Annual Report 2007-08, Tata Sons Ltd.

60

Exhibit 31 Details about Merger & Acquisition activities considered by TATA group
Year 2001 2002 TCS 2004 2004

TATA Company
Tata Sons - TCS

Acquired Company
Computer Maintenance Corporation (CMC) Ltd Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (VSNL) Airline Financial support Services India (AFS) Aviation Software Development Consultancy India(ASDC) Phoenix Global Solutions Financial Network Services Pearl Group Comicrom Tata Infotech Good Earth Corporation & FMali Herb Inc JEMCA Joekels Tea Packers Vitax and Flosana trademarks Regent Hotel The Pierre Starwood group (W Hotel) Campton Place Hotel Hughes Telecom (India) Gemplex Dishnet DSL's ISP division Tyco Global Network Teleglobe International Tata Power Broadband Transtel Telecoms (TT) China Enterprise Communications Limited (CEC) Daewoo Commercial Vehicle Hispano Carrocera Tata Finance Jaguar and Land Rover Hind Lever Chemicals Indo Maroc Phosphore S.A. (IMACID)

Country
India India India India

Stake acquired
51.23 % 100% (wholly owned) 100% (wholly owned)

Value

GBP 271 mn

Tata Tea -Tata Tea (GB)

2004 2005 2005 2005 2006 2005 2006 2006

India Australia UK Chile India US Czech Republic South Africa Poland India US Sydney US India USA India US US India South Africa China

Structured deal

100% (wholly-owned) Assets: intangible and tangible 33.3%

$31 mn GBP11.60 mn GBP0.91 mn

Tata Tea - Tetley group Indian Hotels

2007 2002 2005 2005 2007 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2007 2008

Effective 100% Lease of the property 100% (wholly-owned) 50.83%

Tata Teleservices Tata communications

INR 450cr $9 mn $29 mn $58 mn INR 859cr

$33 mn 50% equity interest

Tata Motors

2004 2005 2005 2008 2004 2005

Korea Spain India UK India Morocco

100% (wholly-owned) 21% Merger Amalgamation Equal partner

$102 mn Euro12 mn $2.3 bn $38 mn

Tata Chemicals

Journal of Case Research


2005 2008 Tata Steel 2005 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2007 Brunner Mond

vol:1
UK US Singapore Thailand UK India India Indonesia Spain Spain US UK India Germany India Germany
Switzer land

issue: i
*63.5% (Dec 2005) **36.5%(March 2006) 100% 100%(wholly-owned) 67.11% 100% acquisition 30% equity stake 79% 60% <30% Not disclosed $24.09 mn Euro7 mn Rs115 cr *Rs508 cr **Rs290 cr

Tata Power

Telco Construction Equipment Company (Telcon) Tata Industries Tata Tech Trent TACO Tata Metaliks Tata Interactive Tata Coffee TRF Tata Projects

General Chemical Industrial Products NatSteel Asia Pte Millenium Steel Corus Rawmet Industries Coastal Gujarat Power PT Kaltim Prima Coal and PT Arutmin Indonesia Serviplem SA Comoplesa Lebrero SA Indigene Pharmaceuticals INCAT International Landmark Wndsch Weidinger Usha Ispat, Redi Unit Tertia Edusoft Gmbh Tertia Edusoft AG Eight O' Clock Coffee Company York Transport Equipment (Asia) Artson Engineering

$468 mn $167 mn Rs101 cr

76% 100% (wholly-owned) 90% 90.38% 100% (wholly-owned) 51%

US Singapore India

$220 million

Source: www.tata.com (accessed on May 8, 2009)

62

Journal of Case Research

vol:1

issue: i

Exhibit 32 International Projects


Country Australia Location Bowen Basin in Central Queensland Year 2005 Project Mining capacity of 58 million tonnes of raw coal for 14 years Coal Project located in Queensland, Australia. The Carborough Downs coal project is majority owned and operated by a subsidiary of AMCI Holdings Australia Pty Ltd. A Ferro Chrome Plant is proposed at Richards Bay, South Africa to produce High Carbon Ferro Chrome, for global consumers. Potential to extract 720 million tonnes by open-cut methods from a major coal resource in the Benga Licence. Under the terms of agreement, Tata Steel will pay AUD100 million (approximately 88.2 million USD) to acquire 35% of Riversdale's Benga and Tete licences. The JV comprises two licences (the Benga and Tete licenses) Tata Steel Limited and SODEMI (state owned company for mineral development) The project will be implemented by a joint venture company, wherein Tata Steel will have a major shareholding. The iron ore from this project will be supplied to Tata Steel Group facilities especially those located in the United Kingdom and Netherlands. Tata Steel Limited and the members of the Al Bahja Group, a leading business house of Oman A proposed steel complex with an estimated capacity of 4.5 million tonnes per year. Another MOU was signed to set up a cold rolling mill in Ha Tinh province.

South Africa

Richards Bay (in uMhlathuze Municipality)

2006

Mozambique Key coal exploration tenements (the Benga and Tete licences) held by Riversdale in Mozambique

2007

Ivory Coast (West Africa) Nimba Iron ore deposits in Ivory Coast (West Africa) 2007

Oman

Vietnam

Uyun region in the Salalah province Ha Tinh province

2008

2008

Source: http://www.tatasteel.com/Company/new_investments.asp (as on April 6, 2010)

63

You might also like