Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conduction of disposition (MRP procedure, MRP policy) Material not critical and no demand (during last x months) OR: Minimal planning effort requested (planning with BOM-successor through BOM explosion): C-item NO Demand-driven (MRP, plan-based, deterministic) vs consumption-based disposition LT + LT of BOM-successors < acc. LT Production smoothing and strategic stocking are not primary goals of material planning YES Demand-driven (MRP) NO Consumptionbased No disposition YES
Supplier manages stock more efciently? NO MRP with Master Schedule items (critical items) Material has signicant inuence on production performance OR production technology highly inuences the production process OR high share on overall turnover (A-item) AND top level BOM item YES SMI demand-driven
VS Saisonal planning
Saisonal product?
BOM explosion
No disposition
SM NO YES
Replenishment policy
Consumption-based (normal)
X0, X1
ND
Internal customer
External customer
Continuous review applicable technical and organizational Delivery at any date possible, no xed intervals? A or B items only, if high control costs
Continuous review applicable technical and organizational Delivery at any date possible, no xed intervals? A or B items only, if high control costs Planning with xing horizon: high planning nervousness over BOM YES NO M0: No automatic xing of order proposals NO Set and x order proposal autmatically without manual control NO YES P3 (continuous) NO P4 (continuous) YES M1 M3 YES Set and x order proposal autmatically without manual control NO YES M2 M4 YES Generate order proposals automatically? (good forecast quality) NO Set and x order proposal autmatically without manual control NO Dynamic target stock level (A or Y,Z item) YES RR NO RS Dynamic target stock level (A- or Y,Z item) YES RF YES NO RP YES Continuous review NO Periodic review
Continuous review applicable technical and organizational Delivery at any date possible, no xed intervals? A or B items only, if high control costs
Planning with xing horizon: high planning nervousness over BOM NO R1 with PD YES Set and x order proposal Set and x order proposal manual control YES P1 (periodic) NO P3 (periodic) YES Generate order proposals automatically? (good forecast quality) NO Set and x order proposal Set and x order proposal manual control YES P2 (periodic) NO P4 (periodic) YES NO
NO Periodic review
PD YES
P1 (continuous)
P2 (continuous)
Consider external requirements (Reservations etc. not adequately considered in forecast and safety stock) NO No consideration of ext. requirem.
delivery schedule in place relatively stable average daily demand (X-item) use dynamic ss (R1)
P1 (M1 with MPS items): Order proposals within the xing horizon get xed (but no new proposals)
P2 (M2 with MPS items) Order proposals are xed withing xing horizon No automatic setting of new order proposals A shortage situation in xing horizon is not balanced automatically
Delivery rhythm depends on day of order YES Periodic with delivery rhythm
P3: (M3 with MPS items) not automatic xing of order proposals necessary proposals are shifted to the end of the xing horizon
P4 (M4 with MPS items) Order proposals are not generated automaticaly A shortage situation is not balanced
Taken from 'Automatic Parameter Conguration for Inventory Management in SAP ERP/APO' by David Bucher and Joern Meissner, available at: http://www.meiss.com