Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Version A | 28 April 2009 | 2009 IAA Planetary Defense Conference, 27-30 April 2009 (Granada, Spain)
- Schaffer, M. G., Charania, A., Olds, J. R., "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different NEO Mitigation Options," AIAA-2007-P2-1, 2007 Planetary Defense Conference, Washington, D.C., March 5-8, 2007. - Olds, J. R., Charania, A., Schaffer, M. G., "Multiple Mass Drivers as an Option for Asteroid Deflection Missions," AIAA-2007-S3-7, 2007 Planetary Defense Conference, Washington, D.C., March 5-8, 2007. - Charania, A., Graham, M., Olds, J. R., "Rapid and Scalable Architecture Design for Planetary Defense," AIAA-2004-1453, 1st Planetary Defense Conference: Protecting Earth from Asteroids, Orange County, California, February 24-27, 2004.
The SpaceWorks Engineering / SpaceDev team thanks The Planetary Society (its directors and its members and specifically Dr. Louis D. Friedman and Mr. Bruce Betts) for the opportunity to present the Foresight design and increase public awareness of the potential planetary threat from Near Earth Objects (NEOs) through the Apophis Mission Design Competition (Foresight: 1st place overall). Special thanks are extended to Mr. Dan Gerachi for his leading financial support for this endeavor.
- Foresight spacecraft is a small satellite mission design to orbit Near Earth Object (NEO) Apophis
- Primary mission: reduce future orbital uncertainty of Apophis
- Over a span of 300 days reduces the 3 error ellipse of Apophis' trajectory ("keyhole" or bplace encounter) in 2029 to 6.0 kilometers by 2017 (from 4500 km today) - Purpose-designed to meet minimum requirements of The Planetary Societys 2007 Apophis Mission Design Competition (1st place overall international winner)
- Characteristics
- Small orbiter spacecraft with minimal instruments and complexity
- Foresights Encounter Spacecraft (ES): 220 kg (wet mass), ~85 cm cube (stowed) - Total launch mass with Propulsive Transfer Vehicle (PTV): 1,608 kg (wet mass with payload)
- Flexible
- Multiple launch windows between 2012 and 2014 (extended mission option)
OVERVIEW
9
Copyright 2009, SpaceWorks Engineering, Inc. (SEI) | www.sei.aero
Foresight: A Radio Beacon Mission to Asteroid Apophis LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRAo1dN7zMc CHANNEL: SpaceWorksEng FORESIGHT ANIMATION
10
Copyright 2009, SpaceWorks Engineering, Inc. (SEI) | www.sei.aero
11
There is a 600 m long keyhole somewhere in the current 4500 km position ellipse. If Apophis goes through this region of space during its close approach in 2029, in 2036 it will hit the Earth.
Apophis, a 270 meter wide near-Earth asteroid, will pass within the range of geostationary satellites during its close approach to the Earth in April 2029
According to S. R. Chesley in 2005, the
2029 Apophis-Earth encounter distance is predicted to be 5.89 Earth radii, 0.35 Earth radii, (3)
Today, we have a 99.7% confidence (3 sigma error) that in 2029 Apophis will be within a 4500 km window (with the 600 m keyhole somewhere in this window)
Results in a 1
After 300 days of orbiting Apophis, the Foresight mission will reduce the size of this window to approximately 6 km window (Goal in the Planetary Society Competition was 14 km)
This will help determine whether Apophis will pass through the keyhole in 2029 and subsequently impact the Earth when it comes back in 2036
Foresight spacecraft: concept design for radio tagging mission to Near Earth Asteroid (NEO) Apophis
Designed to meet requirements of 2007 Planetary Society Apophis Mission Design Competition) Goal: Apophis tracking accuracy must be adequate to reduce the long dimension of the 3 error ellipse to 14 kilometers by 2017, for reference, this translates approximately to a 10% impact probability if the keyhole is right in the middle of the 14-kilometer error ellipse. Joint team design with SpaceWorks Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and SpaceDev, Inc.
Low-cost, low-risk, robust, minimal science mission to obtain accurate tracking information Leverages off the shelf technologies, incorporating leaner approaches to spacecraft design Launch on Orbital Sciences Corporation (OSC) Minotaur IV (Wallops Island, Virginia USA)
Five launch windows have been identified spanning years 2012 to 2014 Chemical propulsive transfer vehicle to perform outbound burn to Apophis (3,600 m/s) with Foresight encounter spacecraft performing portion of Earth departure, and Apophis capture burn (total less than 2,400 m/s)
Foresight orbiting spacecraft powered by solar arrays augmented by rechargeable batteries (280.6 W EOL); transfer vehicle is powered by onboard batteries The Spacecraft has two main instruments, a multi-spectral imager and laser altimeter The total cost for this mission is estimated to be $130.9 M ($87.9 M for spacecraft and instrument development and acquisition, $21 M for operations, and $22 M for the launch vehicle) Overall system reliability is estimated to be 90.2%
Over a span of 300 days reduces the 3 error ellipse of Apophis' trajectory ("keyhole" or b-place encounter) in 2029 to 6.0 kilometers by 2017
12,000 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1/2011 Total Delta V Departure Delta V Arrival Delta V 7/2011 1/2012 7/2012 1/2013 7/2013 1/2014 7/2014 1/2015 Total Delta V Limit
Launch Window 1
Launch Window 2
Launch Window 3
Launch Window 4
Launch Window 5
Delta V [m/s]
Departure Date
Departure, Arrival, and Total Delta-V for Minimum Total Delta-V Trajectories from LEO to Apophis.
8,000 7,500 7,000 6,500 Total Delta V Limit 6,000 5,500 5,000 Nominal Mission Launch Date Primary Window 53 Days Alternate Window A 13 Days Secondary Window 43 Days Alternate Window B 18 Days Alternate Window C 7 Days
Delta V [m/s]
Departure, Arrival, and Total Delta-V for Minimum Total Delta-V Trajectories from LEO to Apophis for Specified Launch Windows
Minimum Total Delta-V Earth-Apophis Transfer Trajectories for each Launch Window
Mission Phase
Earth Departure: PTV Maneuver Stage Separation Commissioning Cruise Trailing Capture Maneuver Initial Survey Apophis Capture Maneuver Observation Apophis Withdraw Maneuver Tracking Extended Mission
6,500 6,000 5,500 814 m/s 1,851 m/s 5,000 2,047 m/s 4,500 1,231 m/s 4,000 533 m/s 90 m/s 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 3,600 m/s 1,500 1,000 500 0 Primary Alternate A Secondary Launch Window Alternate B Alternate C 3,600 m/s 3,600 m/s 3,600 m/s 3,600 m/s 90 m/s 638 m/s 90 m/s 224 m/s 90 m/s 90 m/s 766 m/s 2,144 m/s 513 m/s 176 m/s 1,156 m/s 192 m/s 515 m/s
ES Rem aining ES Arrival Burn ES Departure Burn PTV Reserve PTV Departure Burn
Delta V [m/s
Spacecraft and Propulsive Transfer Vehicle (PTV) Delta-V Budget for Optimum Launch Dates within each Launch Window
16 m/s 2,500 353 m/s 2,250 100 m/s 60 m/s 2,000 996 m/s 100 m/s 60 m/s
32 m/s 100 m/s 60 m/s Reserve 100 m/s 60 m/s Maneuvering Station-keeping Arrival Burn Departure Burn 355 m/s
Delta V [m/s]
1,500
1,851 m/s
1,000
2,047 m/s
750 1,231 m/s 500 638 m/s 250 533 m/s 224 m/s 0 Primary Alternate A Secondary Launch Window Alternate B Alternate C
Encounter Spacecraft Delta-V Budget for Optimum Launch Dates within each Launch Window
Internal software tools were developed by the Foresight team to accurately propagate Apophiss orbit state and predict the uncertainty in Apophis state as a function of number of measurements and time between measurements An 8th/9th order n-body numerical propagator with a variable step size was used to propagate the actual and dispersed orbits of Apophis forward from a given state and epoch
The Sun, all of the planets and the Earth's moon are considered in the gravitational model. The perturbing effects of the large asteroid-belt asteroids Ceres, Pallas, and Vesta are also included. Solar pressure and the Yarkovsky effect are not modeled, but their associated uncertainties are addressed in the analysis For a given starting condition, the propagators step-wise integration tolerances were set so that results for position accuracies were on the order of a few meters in 2029
Guess Initial State, X0_p
Propagate X0_p
Converged?
Optimizer
Yes
X0 = X0_p
1000
100
14 km Target 10
0.1 4/21/2013
6/20/2013
8/19/2013
2/15/2014
4/16/2014
Apophis Error Ellipse Reduction for Target Mission (With Fine Monte Carlo)
1 0
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3 -2 -1 0 -1 Location Probability -2 -3 -4
-7.49500
-7.50000
-7.50500
-7.51000
+/- 3 = 6 km
-7.51500
-7.52000
-5 -6 -7
-7.52500
-7.53000
-7.53500
-7.54000 -1.50500 -1.50000 -1.49500 -1.49000 -1.48500 -axis Position (Earth radii)
-8
Initial and Final Position Error in 2029 after 300 Days of Tracking (B-Plane Error Ellipse Comparison) (Assuming no Additional Earth Observations after 2012)
P O
A V
C E
E R
C V
R I
A E
F W
26
27
Component Propulsion S/C Main Engine22 S/C RCS23 PTV Main Engine24 PTV RCS
25
No. on ES 1 6 0 0
No. on PTV 0 0 1 4
Specifications Thrust (vac): 445 N, Isp: 309 s, T/W: 24.39 Thrust (vac): 2 N, Isp: 265 s, T/W: 0.75 Thrust (vac): 4000 N, Isp: 293 s, T/W: 56.4 Thrust (vac): 21 N, Isp: 285 s, T/W: 3.81, Quad configuration
Thermal Control Heaters26 Power Batteries21 Solar Array22 VES 180 Triple Junction Saft 6 Minco 16 0 -200 to 200C range, Kapton/FEP material
Distribution
PDU
SpaceDev
CPU
PowerPC 750 FX
28
IBM Samsung Silicon Labs AeroAstro Terma Dynacon Northrop Grumman Ball Aerospace Ball Aerospace General Dynamics General Dynamics
1 2 0 12 2 4 1 2 1
0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
Memory SCC
29
Communications Low Gain Antenna34 High Gain Antenna X-Band Transponder35 S-Band Transceiver36
34
Location Probability No. 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 Element Name Structures and Mechanisms Propulsion Thermal Control Power Command and Data Handling Attitude Determination and Control Communications Margin (20%) Dry Mass Consumables Wet Mass Payload Gross Mass Mass [kg] 26.0 7.0 5.0 12.1 4.9 12.9 8.9 13.6 90.2 120.1 210.3 10.0 220.3
5.0
6.0
7.0
11.0 12.0
Location Probability No. 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 Structures Propulsion Thermal Control Power Command and Data Handling Attitude Determination and Control Margin (20%) Dry Mass Consumables Wet Mass Payload Gross Mass Element Name Mass [kg] 133.6 31.8 12.1 6.2 1.6 1.5 37.4 224.2 1,163.1 1,387.3 220.3 1,607.6
549 cm
462 cm
309 cm
205 cm
Acquisition Cost [$US FY2007] $23.74 M $14.77 M $9.27 M Location Probability $6.30 M $20.99 M $22.00 M $73.03 M
Total Cost [$US FY2007] $81.59 M $38.28 M $43.61 M $6.30 M $20.99 M $22.00 M $130.88 M
Frequency
150
Launch Vehicle
100 50
LOM
5.2%
0.8%
3.2%
0.5%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
0 88.6% 89.0% 89.3% 89.6% 90.0% 90.3% 90.6% 90.9% 91.3% 91.6%
Other thoughts
ESPA ring designs may offer potential cost savings for asteroid missions, but schedule and launch integration issues may affect overall benefits Transponder missions do not have to be technology demonstration missions Potential leveraging of multiple funding sources (multiple end users, the U.S. DoD/NASA/DHS) for actual mission Consider use of Falcon 1e: 1,010 kg to LEO for $11.27 M (FY2009, Q4)
LEO: 185 km circular orbit launched due east (9.1 deg)
Business Address: SpaceWorks Engineering, Inc. (SEI) 1200 Ashwood Parkway, Suite 506, Atlanta, GA 30338 U.S.A. Phone: 1+770.379.8000 | Fax: 1+770.379.8001 | www.sei.aero | info@sei.aero
w
36