Video 4

Confusion of Face
Hi, my name is Marcus Ever wonder what a person is? Everybody uses the word, but how many know what it is? A few years ago a man told me I was a foolish person, a foolish person. But I know I am no body s fool, but maybe I am a person. I went straight to the !ebsters di"tionary to look up the word person. And it said, A person is primarily the Mask of an actor used on stage. !ow, I didn t know that. #o I went ba"k to this man and asked, !hy am I hiding my fa"e under a false appearan"e? !ho am I trying to fool. $o one really said that to me, it %ust illustrates a point.. As I was reading through all the laws and legal systems and statutes and regulations, I noti"ed that all these laws apply to Persons. I never read anything in legal do"uments or statutes that apply to %ust a Man. It would say, things like, $o person shall drive a motor vehi"le or you will suffer a penalty. &r no person shall do this. &r no person shall keep this e'"ept under the authority of a li"en"e and sub%e"t to the regulations. $ever did I see, $o man shall hunt deer e'"ept under the authority of a li"en"e and sub%e"t to the regulations. It would seem that the law does not regulate a man, only a person. If there is a word that is more "ommonly used than person, I do not know what it is. !e say, (he s a ni"e person or (he s a bad person . )e showed up in person or I will deal with him only in person. I heard a do"tor say (this disease "an be passed from person to person . I have heard of (personal property . I have heard people say (it s not personal, only business . #o, basi"ally, you would think that everyone is a (person . *hen I learned there are many different kinds of persons in +anada, in any "ountry.

I heard a "op say (he had drugs on his person . *hat s the possessive "ase. #o, people "an have (a person . )ow about (we have a sear"h warrant to sear"h your offi"e and your person . Is it possible not to have (a person . I wonder if it is possible to show up somewhere or be present somewhere, but not in person. I know a guy who went to "ourt and talked to the ,udge but later was arrested be"ause he didn t appear in person. But, if he was there, why was he later arrested. I read that in +anada, women be"ame (persons in -./.. 0rior to that women weren t (persons . #o, before -./., women "ould not "at"h that disease that the do"tor said would pass from person to person and if a "op had found drugs on her, they "ouldn t have been on (her person , maybe they would have had to have been in her po"ket. I learned that +orporations are persons. *hey "an sue and be sued in "ourt. But, this person "an t drive. *his person "an t vote. I know they "an lobby to government. I wonder how they lobby to government. #ome other person must drive them there so they "an lobby in person. I learned that the +ounty of #im"oe is a person. 1ast week that person said there would be no garbage "olle"tion ne't week. I learned that the +ity of *oronto was a person. *his person has to apply for a li"ense to keep prote"ted wildlife at their 2oo. *he law says they have to apply in person. #ome people are put in prison and lose their person. *hey take their person away from them, probably be"ause there isn t enough room in the small little "ages or "ells where they keep them. I saw that the +anadian +harter of 3ights and 4reedoms guarantees everyone the right to life, liberty and se"urity of the person. *he 5.#. +onstitution guarantees that every "iti2en is se"ure in their houses, persons, papers and effe"ts. I also learned that a baby is not a person unless it is born, dead or alive. Baby do"tors used to be taught that when pregnant women "ame in they had two patients. *oday they only have one person as a patient. *here are groups that want elephants, "himpan2ees and dolphins to be persons. *hen if you shoot one, you will have shot a person. 3ight now, a "himpan2ee is the same as an unborn baby 6 a non7person. 8ou "an shoot either one, there is no legal problem there.

Aboriginees in Australia, prior to -.49, were not persons. 8ou "ould get a permit or a li"ense from the British )igh +ommission in Australia to shoot one. *hat s a fa"t. #o, when they shot and killed an Aboriginal, they did not shoot a person. *hey must have shot a non7person. *hey shot an animal. If this aboriginal was wearing a pair of shoes they "ould not have been his personal shoes. If they had talked to him they would have seen he had no personality. I m sure when the Aboriginal said :!hy are you going to shoot me?; the answer would have been :!ell, I paid the fee for a li"ense to shoot you. It s not personal, %ust business.< Are you "onfused, do you still think you know what a person is? Every law, statute, regulation, ordinan"e and poli"y that you have ever obeyed applies to every person. Every obligation, duty, responsibility, debt, liability, omission, negle"t, prohibition, punishment, allegian"e, loyalty, "redit, benefit, right, interest, privilege, a""ount, name, address, title, deed, a"tion, performan"e et". et". et". applies to every person. #o, what "an we learn about (person . !hat does the en"y"lopedia say about person. It says personhood "ontinues to be a topi" of international debate. *he beginning of human personhood is a "on"ept long debated by law, religion and philosophy. Christianity is the first philosophical system to use the word person! in its modern sense. *hus, the word (person was originally a theologi"al term "reated and defined by +hristians to e'plain +hristian theologi"al "on"epts. )ow "an there be a "ontroversy between philosophy and law about a person or what a person is? All of our laws pertain to persons. If no one knows what a person is, how are people being "onvi"ted and senten"ed to prison. #o, what do the e'perts say about a person? "udge #lackstone, a ,udge in the -=th "entury "o7wrote that> 0ersons are divided by the law into either natural persons, or artifi"ial. $atural persons are su"h as the ?od of nature formed us> artifi"ial are su"h as "reated and devised by human laws for the purposes of so"iety and government; whi"h are "alled "orporations or bodies politi". #ou$ier %aw &ictionary going ba"k about -99 years, says> *his word is applied to men, women and "hildren, who are "alled natural persons. In law, man and person are not e'a"tly synonymous terms. Any human being is a man, whether he be a member of so"iety or not, whatever may be the rank he holds, or whatever may be his age, se',

et". A person is a man "onsidered a""ording to the rank he holds in so"iety, with all the rights to whi"h the pla"e he holds entitles him, and the duties whi"h it imposes. #o, that is saying that not every man is a person, but every person must be a man. But, "orporations and "ities are not men. #o, that "ouldn t be true. 'he &ictionary of Canadian %aw says, A person is any being that is "apable of having rights and duties, and is "onfined to that. 0ersons are of two "lasses only @ natural persons and legal persons. A natural person is a human being that has the "apa"ity for rights or duties. A legal person is anything to whi"h the law gives a legal or fi"tional e'isten"e or personality, with "apa"ity for rights and duties. *he only legal person known to our law is the "orporation, the body "orporate. (e)sters &ictionary says the ordinary meaning of this word says :A person is primarily the Aask of an a"tor used on stage. I wonder if ?od made any persons, what does he say about persons. *od+ )e says> Bo not they blaspheme that worthy name by the whi"h ye are "alled? If ye fulfill the royal law a""ording to the s"ripture, *hou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself, ye do well> But if ye have respe"t to persons, ye "ommit sin, and are "onvin"ed of the law as transgressors. 4or whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. ,ames /> =7-9 Person> defined in early -C99 s> A human being represented in dialogue, fi"tion, or on the stage; "hara"ter. +hara"ter of offi"e. A player appears in the person of a "hara"ter. ,n law, a person is one ena)led to maintain pleas in court. DA person is one who "an pleadEbeg for things. &therwise, you "an t beg for anything.F #o, your birth "ertifi"ate does not represent a human being. A human being appears as the birthed non7living entity "ertified by the birth "ertifi"ate. Personal+ Belonging to men or women, not to things; not real, present in person; not a"ting by representative; as a personal interview. 0ersonal estate, belonging to the person as opposed to real estate. 0ersonal identity, in metaphysi"s, sameness of being, of whi"h "ons"iousness is the eviden"e. Personate+ *o represent by a fi"titious or assumed "hara"ter so as to pass for the person represented. *o represent by a"tion or appearan"e; to assume the "hara"ter and a"t the part of another. *o pretend hypo"riti"ally. *o resemble. A mask.

Personification+ *he giving to an inanimate being the figure or the sentiments and language of a rational being; prosopopoeia; as, "onfusion heard his voi"e. Personify+ *o give animation to inanimate ob%e"ts. *o as"ribe to an inanimate being sentiments, a"tions and language of a rational being. *o represent as an inanimate being. %egal Personality> *his is the "hara"teristi" of a non7living entity regarded by law to have the status of personhood. #o, what is all this. *his is the a"t of ne"roman"y; invoking the dead, to obtain a remedy in law to re"eive a %usti"e be"ause of an in%usti"e. +on%uring up the dead as a medium, an instrument to a"hieve a purpose. *he person is really a dead thing and you are giving it life. 8ou are giving life to the dead. 1et s see what lawyers have to say> A person is re"ogni2ed by law as su"h, not )ecause he is human, but be"ause rights and duties are as"ribed to him. *he person is the legal sub%e"t or substan"e of whi"h the rights and duties are attributes. An individual human being "onsidered as having su"h attributes is what lawyers "all a :natural person.< A person by #tatute term may in"lude a firm, labour organi2ation, partnership, asso"iation, "orporation, legal representative, trustees, trustees in bankrupt"y, re"eivers. 1et s see what other en"y"lopedia s say> A -person- Dfrom 1atin language is a persona, meaning :mask<F is a being, su"h as a human, that has "ertain "apa"ities or attributes "onstituting personhood. 0ersonhood, the pre"ise definition of whi"h is the sub%e"t of mu"h "ontroversy. )ow "an there be a "ontroversy when persons are going to %ail and being e'e"uted in person.< In an"ient 3ome, the word :persona< :D1atinF or :prosopon D?reekF originally referred to the masks worn by a"tors on stage. *he various masks represented the various :personae< in the stage play. In 3oman 1aw, the word :persona< be"ame used to refer to a role played in "ourt, and it be"ame established that it was the role rather than the a"tor that "ould have rights, powers, and duties, be"ause different individuals "ould assume the same roles, the rights, powers, and duties followed the role rather than the a"tor, and ea"h individual "ould a"t in more than one role, ea"h a different :person< in law.

*hat s a split personality; a multiple personality disorder, s"hi2ophrenia. $ow you know why you don t have any rights, powers and duties. *hey follow the role, not the a"tor. *he "on"ept of a :person< was further developed during the *rinitarian and +hristologi"al debates of the first through si'th "enturies. #in"e then, a number of important "hanges to the word s meaning and use have taken pla"e, and attempts have been made to redefine the word with varying degrees of adoption and influen"e. Aany modern speakers of "olloGuial English "onflate the meanings of role and a"tor, whi"h "an result in some "onfusion when they try to enter into legal dis"ourse. #o, this has something to do with +hrist. #o, if you are a ,ew or a Auslim or anyone born before +hrist "ouldn t be a person. #o, we ve only had persons for /9-H years if that s what a person is. Prosopagnosia D?reek> :prosopon< I :fa"e<, :agnosia< I :not knowing<F is a disorder of fa"e per"eption where the ability to re"ogni2e fa"es is impaired, while the ability to re"ogni2e other ob%e"ts may be relatively inta"t. DAgnosia @ an agnosti"F Prosopopoeia D?reekF is a rhetori"al devi"e in whi"h a speaker or writer "ommuni"ates to the audien"e by speaking as another person or ob%e"t. *he term literally derives from the ?reek roots :prosopon< fa"e, person. #o, every time we speak (in person we are speaking as someone else, eviden"ed by the mask we wear. !e are speaking in disguise. !e are "on"ealing our real identity and putting on another identity. *his term also refers to a figure of spee"h in whi"h an animal or inanimate ob%e"t is as"ribed human "hara"teristi"s or is spoken of in anthropomorphi" language. Juintilian writes of the power of this figure of spee"h to :bring down the gods from heaven, evoke the dead, and give voi"es to "ities and states. $e"roman"y againK Personification+ A figure of spee"h in whi"h inanimate ob%e"ts or abstra"tions are endowed with human Gualities or are represented as possessing human form. Also "alled prosopopeia. Personification> the a"t of attributing human "hara"teristi"s to abstra"t ideas. In"arnation, embodiment @ giving "on"rete form to an abstra"t "on"ept.

All of this is "alled the &""ult. *he supernatural. !it"h"raft. And we pra"ti"e it every day of our lives and do not even know we do it. !henever we do anything in person we are evoking the dead as a medium, an instrument to do whatever we are doing it through. As we go on you will see that we a"t, think and speak for the dead. In fa"t, we are the medium that is used by the &""ult to give life to the dead to make it seem real, to make it believable. &f "ourse if we a"t by and through the dead, people would be repulsed so we will %ust "all it a (fi"tion , an abstra"t being, an inanimate being. 0eople will never figure it out. !hy do we have to do this 6. Be"ause we are dead in the 1A!. In the ne't series, you will learn the e'treme evil in this. At this point, it may seem like it isn t a big deal. It isn t until you "an pi"ture the whole thing and the results of this. I wonder if there are any people who are not persons. &f "ourse, the unborn baby, Aboriginal and some prisoners are not persons. A .onperson @ a man regarded as none'istent and having no rights; a man whose e'isten"e is systemati"ally ignored. )ow stupid is that. I "an t see you unless you are a person. In the first video, I said you will not believe this. I said you pra"ti"e the &""ult. 8ou do not see things that are there and you do see things that are not there. )allu"inations and blindness. A severe mental disorder. 8ou see, the +onstitution that you think you are a member of is only make believe. 3emember, I told you that there are only two ways to see. !ith your eyes and with your mind. Aembers of the +anadian +onstitution "an only be seen with the mind. /o, a man, a simple, plain, 0ust man is not recogni1ed )y the law that you call a legal system. *od does not respect persons, and our law only respects persons. #o, people who build "hur"hes for ?od, well your "hur"h is a person and that person does not have to pay property ta'es. *o have a persona Dto be a personF was to have a face )efore the law. *hat is to say to possess rights and privileges before a "ourt or as being able to give testimony upon the strength of one s own words or as owning a respe"table identity. If you have no persona, no mask, you have no fa"e before the law.

#o, a mask be"omes your identity. It is all the %udge "an see. 8ou are in disguise. &f "ourse, he only sees it in his mind. #o, what is a non7person @ a man who "annot be seen, no fa"e before the law, no mask, a man who holds no publi" offi"e, a man who is systemati"ally ignored, a man whose presen"e is not re"ogni2ed, a man who does not wear a mask, a man who does not give legal advi"e, a man removed from the memory of the publi", a man who has no rights, prote"tions, privileges, responsibilities, duties or legal liability. I "an tell you that a person has no gender and owns no property. A fi"tion owns no property be"ause it is nothing, it is a fi"tion, it is not real. 8ou "annot see a person, smell a person, taste a person, feel a person or hear a person. It is non7sense. In fa"t a person is not a noun, it is an adverb. But you "an be made to reali2e Dthe a"t of making realF a person if you think, speak and a"t for it. *his is of "ourse what is "alled an insane delusion. $ow, getting ba"k to the only person known to our law. 1et s break down the "on"ept as it is used in our law. Per+ 1atin preposition, denoting through, near, "lose, as, through or with, denoting the agent, means, instrument or "ause; /on> the male issue of a parent, a native or inhabitant of a "ountry; as the sons of Britain. A son is that whi"h is fathered. *he father is he who makes, "reates or "omposes anything. If a "ountry "an have sons, then the "ountry must be their father. 4ather and son are re"ipro"al terms. Aeaning you "annot have a father without having a son. And you "annot have a son without having a father. #o, per2son is a process not a being. A son is a )eing. A person is one who did the a"t in the pla"e and stead of the son, or by means of the son. *he use of a medium. &ne who a"ts as the son, in the name of the son, by and through the son, and appears to )e the son is the e3act person. D&ut of the a"t.F In "ourt this is "alled pleading into a fi"tion of law. 0leading as the dead. It is an out of

body e'perien"e. *his is why a summons to appear is a "on%uration. Evoking the dead. But you are summoned to appear as the son. In the pla"e and instead of. *he one who by and through the son, or the dead 6.. did the a"t. *he a"tor fulfilling the role. *his is a :#ummons to appear<. It is "alling the dead to appear. A "ourt only has %urisdi"tion over the dead. *he :5nravelling< series will show the blasphemy of what this is really about, religious people will go berserk. 3emember the 3egistrar ?eneral said that your birth "ertifi"ate was never meant to be used as personal identifi"ation. It only identifies the son. !hen you use it, you be"ome (the person . 8ou be"ame this entity that a"ted by and through the son Dthe instrumentF. 8ou have given life to the dead. *hat is "alled a resurre"tion of the dead. A11 3I#E. *his "ourt is now in session. A "ountry "annot be a real father and "annot have real sons. It is %ust pretend. *hey are "alled (fi"tions of law or (paper fi"tions . *hese sons have no "onne"tion based on blood but based on affinity. *he only person known to our law is one to whi"h we give as a lawmaker a fi"tional e'isten"e. !hy? !ho is going to obey our "ommands. 4i"tions do not e'ist. *hey are all in your mind only. #o we think, speak and a"t through this fi"tional son, thus we are a (natural person . *he thinking, speaking and a"ting "an only be done by you; thus the "ause of every effe"t is done by and through you, the living one. #o, the a"t was done (in person . *his is the way the legal system was designed. It doesn t mean it is right. I think therefore I am. I speak therefore I am. I a"t therefore I am. *he eviden"e of the abstra"t or fi"tional son is the +anadian issued identifi"ation. 8ou think you are the same or identi"al to it and you may use it as a foundational identity do"ument. $ow, let s look at the father7son relationship. All law is based on a father7son relationship. *he legal term is Parens patriae @ means parent of the "ountry. *he parens patriae do"trine has its roots in English +ommon 1aw. In feudal times various obligations and powers, "olle"tively referred to as the :royal prerogative<, were reserved to the king. 'he king e3ercised these functions in his role as father of the country . !hose your Baddy???

!hat is a (fi"tion of law ? A "onvenient fi"tion or a misfortunate truth. 4i"tion> L1atin fi"tio, from fingo, to feignM 4eigned; imaginary; not real. *he human persons are as fi"titious as the airy ones. +ounterfeit; false; not genuine; feigned representation. 4eign> *o invent or imagine; to form an idea or "on"eption of something not real. *o make a show of; to pretend; to assume a false appearan"e; to "ounterfeit. *o represent falsely; to pretend; invented; devised; imagined; assumed. *his is nothing more than fraud. But you are the one who is doing it. $o one is for"ing you to do it. #o, it s not a fraud then, is it? But, it s fraud. 8ou are being tri"ked into "ommitting fraud. $ow, here is man s %ustifi"ation or rationale for this, but it doesn t answer (why . F,C',4. 4F %A(. *he assumptionDremember an assumption is un%ust, iniGuityF that a "ertain thing is true, and whi"h gives to a person or thing, a Guality whi"h is not natural to it, and establishes, "onseGuently, a "ertain disposition, Dthe a"t or means of getting rid of somethingF whi"h, without the fi"tion, would be repugnant to reason and to truth. It is an order of things whi"h does not e'ist, but whi"h the law pres"ribe; or authori2es it differs from presumption, be"ause it establishes as true, something whi"h is false; 4i"tions were invented by the 3oman praetors, who, not possessing the power to a)rogate the law, Dwhat law are we talking about hereF were nevertheless willing to derogate from it, under the pretense of doing eGuity. D0retense is pretending with the intention to de"eive.F !hat law "ouldn t they get rid of? *his was the 3oman empire. It "ontrolled the whole world. !hat law "ouldn t they get rid of? *hink about it. And, they did it under the pretense of doing eGuity. It goes on to say that a fi"tion of law is the assumption that a "ertain thing is true and whi"h gives to a person or thing a Guality that is not natural to it and establishes, "onseGuently, a certain disposition, whi"h without the fi"tion, would be pungent to reason and truth. ,t is an order of things that does not e3ist, but that the law pres"ribes or authori2es. 4i"tions of law owe their origin to the legislative usurpations of the ben"h. Dthe legislative usurpation of whose ben"h?F #o, somebody usurped the ben"h, sat on it, and started making laws. *hen it goes on to say that the law abounds in fi"tions 6 thousands of them.

#ee, a fi"tion of law is like this 6. I make a "ontra"t with somebody 6. I make some obligations, some agreements, some promises and they make some agreements and promises ba"k to me, so I get some "onsideration for the "ontra"t be"ause I m not going to do a "ontra"t for nothing, e'"ept we impose a fi"tion of law to "reate the "ontra"t. *here is nobody there, it is pulled out of thin air. It s a pretend person, %ust so I "an get what I want under this "ontra"t. Canadian %aw &ictionary @ 4i"tion> A rule of law whi"h assumes something whi"h is false is true, and will not allow it to be disproved. An assumption by law that something whi"h is false is true. A statute may state that N is to be treated as 8. *hat is a rule of law. #o, if you think truth is in law, it is not. It is real law, not your legal system Bid you know that there is a (realistic fiction!? 3ealisti" fi"tion strives to make the reader feel as if they are reading something that is a"tually happening; something that though not real, is des"ribed in a believable way that helps the reader make a pi"ture as if it were an a"tual event. *his "an also "onfuse the reader into making the reader think it s non7fi"tion. #o, it said that the law abounds in 4i"tions. 3eally? Boes not e'ist in nature. *he supernatural does not e'ist in nature. Bo you think our law abounds in the supernatural, the o""ult, wit"h"raft, ne"roman"y? It s all supernatural. Anything that produ"es an unnatural effe"t is wit"h"raft. *hat is what wit"h"raft is. #o, for the tri"k to work, you have to be an unwitting a""ompli"e. If you knew you were doing this, you would know it s a fraud. Also the tri"k would have no value unless someone brings to life the fi"tion. Also, people would ask :!hy do I have to do this?< +an we not %ust be who we are? *he answer is (no . *hose that know would have to tell you the truth about the law and "ould never take advantage of you. 8ou see, I m going to e'plain later, in the :+onfusion of Aoney< how your property is being stolen; half through money. 8our whole life you have been a"ting as an entity that is not alive. 8ou provided all your labour through and as this entity. It is the only entity known to our law. !hy? Be"ause it is the only thing we "an "reate in our head. 8ou "annot apply your will to something you do not own. And be"ause you "annot "reate anything, we have to make you believe so we "an steal from you. It is all about stealing. *his whole thing is about property and stealing.

#o, I have given you the break down of the word person as it is supposed to be known. I know it is hard to grasp "ompletely, but it was designed that way. I will e'plain the "omplete "on"ept of (the person in the :5nravelled #eries<. *here is more to the story. It is the key to understanding the whole illusion of how you lost your birthright, inheritan"e and property. I am going to end this program with a 5iddle+ 3emember, per means by or through or by means of, so when I ask this riddle, for some of you people, a light will go off. )ere is the riddle. +an you think of anything that "an be obtained, only by means of the son? OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO In the ne't video we will look at 1aw and ?overnment as you are presumed to know it. *he groups and people who protest against their government may want to rethink their a"tions or "hange dire"tion. 8ou will learn how you have been enti"ed and de"eived into be"oming the pro'imate "ause of your own misery.

'ill then...........My

name is Marcus.