Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Improve Productivity, Quality, Safety, Moral of Workforce Along With Reduce Cost & Response Time With
Improve Productivity, Quality, Safety, Moral of Workforce Along With Reduce Cost & Response Time With
KAIZEN Activities.
Prepared by :- Mr. Deepak Sahoo , TPM Consultant
Day Plan
Start time 3PM End Time : 6 PM
3 PM 4.30 PM 4.50 PM to 6 PM
Agenda
What is Kaizen ? Change Process SGA SMED and Kaizen Tools Kaizen Process 16 Major losses Kaizen Pillar - Details
Kaizen
Change !!!!!
NAME
Customer orientation
FROM
Company Driven Output Inspection
TO
Customer Driven Input Setting
Operational Processes
People processes People skills Decisions
Individual Effort
By pass problem Unilateral Managing
Team Effort
Finding Solution Consultative / Empowered Leading
Leadership
Management Style
Delegation
Empowerment
Kaizen Thinking. Leaders are most important for bringing change in an organization.
A group of guys
A team is a collection of people related to one another who share a common objective and work in a collaboration with one another to achieve a common target.
Prepared by :- Mr. Deepak Sahoo , TPM Consultant
Team Leader is the Eyes & Ears of Team Every team has a leader and members. A team leader
First remove his Hat outside. Has need for improvement Sets targets for the team Good communicator Good coordinator Works as a member Resource person for the members Understands teams strengths and weaknesses Has counseling skills
Vision
Resource
Rewards
Vision
Skills
Action plan
Resource Action plan Action plan
Rewards
Vision
Skills
Rewards
Vision
Skills
Resource
Vision
Skills
Resource
Rewards
Change
Fish Bone
Value Mapping
SMED
Trend
Analysis
80:20
GAP
Process Matrix
OEE
Sweet
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) - This index number for the machine efficiency is multiplication of several sub-indicators, which all have a value between 0 and 1, and 100%. Usually, at least the following sub-indicators are included in the OEE: The machine availability A = (scheduled production time standstill)/( scheduled production time) The relative machine performance P = (average processing time)/(fastest possible processing time) The Quality Q = the fraction approved products In that case, OEE = A x P x Q x 100%. It is possible to add extra sub-indices at will, such as the supply performance S. By doing that, the definition of the OEE can be stretched to such an extent, that it is better to rename it to Overall Factory Efficiency (OFE). Pareto - This is the concept that 20% of the causes are usually responsible for 80% of the consequences (like machine-failures resulting in a low OEE)
SGA or Small Group Activity - A multi-disciplinary improvement group, with for example engineers, operators and quality inspectors, tries to solve one specific problem that is responsible for a low OEE-value. SMED - This acronym stands for Single Minute Exchange of Dies. SMED was invented by Shigeo Shingo at Toyota. He claimed that molds for forming automobile bodies should be exchangeable within ten minutes. Later, this concept widened to reduce machine set-up times in general. In TPM the aim is to increase the OEE, by reducing the standstill time. SMED is also applied in Lean manufacturing.
5 to 10 mins
5 to 10 seconds
F1 in 1957 video
Before
8 hrs
24 hrs 75 mins
After
58 sec
2.7 mins 3 mins
4.
HP IC insert
30 mins
3 mins
TRANSFER LINE
SPECIAL SYSTEM
FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM
VOLUME
VARIETY
HIGH
Value-adding An operation that transforms, converts or changes a product towards that which is sold to a customer
Definition of Value
SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Dies) indicates the changeover time to be reduced to single digit minutes, i.e. less than 10 minutes
SMED is one of the core concepts of TPM, JIT and Lean manufacturing Developed by Shigeo Shingo, during his efforts to help the industry from 1950 to 1969 Conceptual Stages of Changeover Time Reduction: Preliminary Stage: Internal and External Activities are not separated Stage 1: Separating internal and external activities Stage 2: Converting internal to external setup Stage 3: Streamlining all aspects of the setup operation
Traditional Assumptions
Skill, knowledge and experience of operator is essential Large lots essential to compensate for high set up time Economic order quantity is the optimum balance
These ideas, once believed to form the basis for rational production policies, are flawed. They are based upon the unspoken assumption that changeover or set up time cannot be massively reduced
3 Stage of SMED
Separate Internal and External Setup
Convert Internal Setup to External Setup Streamline Internal and External Elements
Setup Reduction
Process
1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Select the topic. Form a Project Team Register the Topic. Implement the improvement Evaluate the results
Check results
Consolidate gains
Prepared by :- Mr. Deepak Sahoo , TPM Consultant
Step - 1
Step - 3
Analyze causes
Stratify and analyze losses Apply analytical techniques (why-why analysis, PM analysis, Fault tree analysis, Value analysis, JIT, TPS ) Conduct experiments, apply specific technology, fabricate prototypes
Plan Improvements
Make improvement proposals and prepare formal draft. Compare cost effectiveness of alternate proposals and make budget Check for possible adverse effects and disadvantages
Step - 5
Implement Improvement
Carryout improvement plan Perform tests, trial runs Provide instructions to work on improved equipment, operating conditions
Step - 7
Consolidate gains
Prepare Control standards. Formulate work standards and manuals Train operators and or fitters to sustain the results Prepare for maintenance prevention program.
Achievements - 1
Plant OEE - Productivity
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1200
63
72
80
800
600 400 200 0
2010
2011
2012 (EXPECTED)
2010
2011
2012 (EXPECTED)
R&M Budget
10804525 11756450 8000000
70
60 50 40 30 20 10 2010 2011 2012 (EXPECTED) 0
64
45
2010
2011
2012 (EXPECTED)
Achievements - 2
M/C Break Down(Major)
40
5S Score
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
35
30 25 20 15
37
83 28
90
10
5 0
11 1
2010
2011
2012 (EXPECTED)
2010
2011
2012 (EXPECTED)
Number of Suggestions
500 364
500
80 55
50
400
300 200 100
10
2010 2011 2012 (EXPECTED)
2010
2011
2012 (EXPECTED)
Achievements - 3
R&M Budget in USD for resins plant
10804525 11756450
7873514
6782805
8000000
2010
2011
2012 (EXPECTED)
2010
2011
2012 (EXPECTED)
Web matrix
100 80 60 40 20 0
73.6
95
10.8
2010 2011 2012 (EXPECTED)
Step - 2
Action Plan
Name OCT12 NOV12 DEC12 JAN13 FEB13
Team Formation Trained the Team about SGA Feasibility study Collection of current and Previous Data Gap Analysis and finding's Value Mapping for each Suggestion Draft the implementation plan Distribute responsibilities among team
32.8%
Oct'11
Nov'11
Dec'11
Jan'12
Feb'12
Mar'12
Apr'12
May'12
Jun'12
Jul'12
Aug'12
Sep'12
5% 9% 9%
1%
45%
logistics
10%
Mechanical
instrumentation
21%
Prepared by :- Mr. Deepak Sahoo , TPM Consultant
Operation
50.0%
46.4%
49.3%
51.4%
48.1%
40.0%
28.0%
30.0% 20.0%
25.5%
10.0%
0.0%
Civil
Electrical
Civil Electrical
HVAC
HVAC
logistics
logistics
Mechanical
instrumentation
Operation
Operation
Mechanical
instrumentation
70.0%
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
30.0%
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Civil Electrical HVAC FI KPI in Sept'12 logistics Phase 1 Target Mechanical instrumentation Phase - 2 Target Operation
Phase 1 Plan Existing Presentation 6D more focus on Electrical; we will customized to all dept. Create Awareness to Civil & Logistic team. FI KPI GAP Analysis to be done in each department.
60.0% 55.8%
50.4% 43.8%
52.3%
40.0%
28.4%
12.2%
Civil
Electrical
HVAC
logistics
Mechanical
instrumentation
Operation
Easy to clean
SOURCE OF CONTAMINATIONS
Easy to lubricate
Oil Localization
Before After
Localised gaurds
The return oil flow from the feed drive gears splash and spread all around the open space inside the machine there by getting contaminated. To avoid the contamination, the return oil flow is channalised from the feed drive gears directly to the lubrication tank
Prepared by :- Mr. Deepak Sahoo , TPM Consultant
EASY TO LUBRICATE
Before
Difficult to Lubricate the oil to gear box
After
Easy to Lubricate the oil to gear box
Easy to Inspect
THEME:
To reduce Inspection time
LOSS NO. 8A
KAIZEN
LOSS STRUCTURE: Inspection Time Reduction IDEA: To bring the pressure gauge for K.O. system outside the machine for easy inspection COUNTERMEASURE: Before After
MACHINE:
Inspection is very difficult and taking more time in the pressure gauge for K.O. system
Difficult to Inspect
ANALYSIS:
WHY 1 Problem : Inspection is difficult WHY 2 Pressure gauge kept inside the machine
15
RESULT:
Sec. 30 sec / change
30
HORIZONTAL DEPLOYMENT :
Inspection is very difficult and it is taking moretime in pressure gauge for K.O. system
Better
No of Areas Identified
2 sec / Day
0
: 5 Nos.
Implemented : 5 Nos.
Before
After
Difficult to Inspect the belt Easy to Inspect the belt condition condition Prepared by :- Mr. Deepak Sahoo , TPM Consultant
VISUAL CONTROLS
Activity
Symbol
Tools
CLEAN
LUB INSPECTION
I S NOC
Any Question ?
Connect With Me @ Mobile :- +974 3370 8982 Email :- dksahoo2@gmail.com
Prepared by :- Mr. Deepak Sahoo , TPM Consultant