AMD filed antitrust lawsuits against Intel in several countries alleging Intel engaged in anti-competitive behavior to maintain its monopoly on microprocessors. In the US, AMD claimed Intel used exclusionary deals, rebates, and technical standards to artificially limit AMD's market share below a level needed for AMD to effectively compete. If proven, these actions would be in violation of antitrust laws. The case involved extensive legal proceedings over several years, including disputes over the scope of evidence between the two companies.
AMD filed antitrust lawsuits against Intel in several countries alleging Intel engaged in anti-competitive behavior to maintain its monopoly on microprocessors. In the US, AMD claimed Intel used exclusionary deals, rebates, and technical standards to artificially limit AMD's market share below a level needed for AMD to effectively compete. If proven, these actions would be in violation of antitrust laws. The case involved extensive legal proceedings over several years, including disputes over the scope of evidence between the two companies.
AMD filed antitrust lawsuits against Intel in several countries alleging Intel engaged in anti-competitive behavior to maintain its monopoly on microprocessors. In the US, AMD claimed Intel used exclusionary deals, rebates, and technical standards to artificially limit AMD's market share below a level needed for AMD to effectively compete. If proven, these actions would be in violation of antitrust laws. The case involved extensive legal proceedings over several years, including disputes over the scope of evidence between the two companies.