Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline-1
Outline-2
Organizational Conflict: The clash that occurs when the goal-directed behavior of one group blocks or thwarts the goals of another Because the goals, preferences, and interest of stakeholder groups differ, conflict is inevitable in organization
Some conflict is good for organization and can improve organizational effectiveness
Can overcome inertia and lead to organizational learning and change Can improve decision making and allow an organization to better change and adapt to its environment
Conflict leads to inability to reach consensus and indecision Too much time spent on bargaining rather than acting swiftly to resolve problems
Outline-3
Outline-4
10
Conflict is a process that consists of five sequential stages Stage 1: Latent conflict: no outright conflict exists, but there is a potential for conflict because of several latent factors
According to Pondy, all organization conflict arises from vertical and horizontal differentiation
11
Interdependence: Subunits desire of autonomy leads to conflict Difference in goals and priorities: Once goals become incompatible, the potential for conflict arises Bureaucratic factors: A classic type of bureaucratic conflict occurs between staff and line function Incompatible performance criteria: The organizations way of monitoring, evaluating, and rewarding different subunits bring them into conflict Competition for scarce resources: When resources are scarce, subunit have to compete for them
12
Stage 2: Perceived conflict: subunits begin to define why the conflict is emerging and begin to analyze the events that have led up to it
Stage 3: Felt conflict: each subunit develops a us-versus-them mentality that puts the blames for the conflict squarely on the other subunit
If nothing is done to solve it, small problem will escalates into huge conflict
13
Stage 4: Manifest conflict: one subunit gets back at another subunit by attempting to thwart its goals
Open aggression Passive aggression doing nothing Manager need to do all they can prevent from reaching the manifest stage, for two reasons: (1) breakdown in communication; (2) aftermath of conflict
14
conflict is resolved in some way, often by the decision of some senior manager If sources of conflict are not resolved, the aftermath will sour future working relationships, and the organizational culture is poisoned by permanently uncooperative relationships
15
16
Outline-6
17
Organizations must balance the need to have some good conflict without letting it escalate into bad conflict The method an organization choose to manage the conflict depends on the source of the problem Conflict can be resolved by two ways: (1)changing organizations structure; (2) changing the attitudes of individuals or replacing the individuals themselves
18
Because task interdependence and differences in goals are two major sources of conflict, altering the level of differentiation and integration to change task relationships is one way to resolve it Increase the number of integrating roles Assign top managers the responsibility for solving conflicts between divisions Make sure the design of an organizations hierarchy of authority is in line with its current needs Good organizational design should minimizes the conflict
19
Bargaining and negotiation Exchange/rotate/terminate individuals Replace members of top management CEOs can also use their power to resolve conflicts and motivate units to cooperate
20
Outline-7
21
Organizational power: the ability of one person or group to overcome resistance by others to achieve a desired objective or result
The possession of power is an important determinant for conflict resolving Conflict and power are intimately related. Individual and groups use their power to influence decision making Power can come from many different sources
22
Outline-8
23
24
Authority: power that is legitimized by the legal and cultural foundations on which an organization is based
A managers exercises a legal right to control resources Superiors hold on power by restricting the information they give to subordinates to make a decision Managers have to realize the difference between decentralization and loss Empowerment: the deliberate decentralization of authority
25
Control over resources: as the organization controls more and more resources in its environment, power within an organization comes from the control of resources
Power is not a fixed quantity Money or capital is the ultimate organizational resource The ability to generate financial resources is a source of power, too
26
Control over information: access to strategic information and the control of the information are sources of considerable power
The control of information is the source of the power of many people or subordinate Those who control over critical information can own the most power
27
Nonsubstitutability: if no one else can perform the tasks that a person or subunit performs, that person or subunit is nonsubstitutable
Only it can provide the resources that other subunit or organization requires
28
Centrality: the subunits that are most central to resource flows have the ability to reduce the uncertainty facing other subunits
29
Control over uncertainty: a subunit that can actually control the principal sources of uncertainty has significant power
Changes in contingencies facing the organization alter which subunits have this power
30
Another important source power stems from the power of the dominant coalition Unobtrusive power: the power flowing from the ability to control the premises behind decision making The power of a coalition resides in its ability to control the assumptions, goals, norms, or values that managers use to judge alternative solutions to a problem
31
Outline-9
32
Organizational politics: activities taken within organizations to acquire, develop, and use power and other resources to obtain ones preferred outcomes in a situation in which there is uncertainty or disagreement about choices
33
Outline-10
34
Increasing indispensability: become indispensable to the organization Increasing nonsubstitutability: develop specialized skills or knowledge that enables one to control a crucial contingency facing the organization Increasing centrality: accept responsibilities that enhance ones reputation or that of ones function Associating with powerful managers:
Forming relationships with stakeholders and other subunits around some common issue Skills in coalition building are important Must be circumspect in the use of power
By setting the agenda, managers can control the issues and problems to be considered
36
37
Outline-11
38
To manage organizational politics and gain its benefits, an organization must establish a balance of power in which alternative views and solutions can be offered and considered by all parties and dissenting views can be heard Balance of power should shift over time toward the party that can best manage the uncertainty and contingencies confronting the organization
39
If balance of power does not encourage allocation of resources to where value is created, the organizational effectiveness suffers If powerful managers can suppress views against their interests, debates become restricted, checks and balances fade, bad conflict increases, and organizational inertia increases
40
41
Summary
42
Summary
43