I

qsTrq$'rqffiq

vruqr:{Es-E/"14frCPs
qw-a ta rowo7offi6- qggi, sr\'f+{,dtrg3, ffir q-qrfr- cffinl, deryq,ffir gtq $T{srqT srsiT, dqgr sq gc"qqlqfi ed*r-o"geu uenwF-o ukortTftqPp qqg{
T{$ffiI ftqnngqeT/ q-sT.-tilqgq

ogne lL ft.qs.=i. ffi6 ?.t/o7/artL

q-Rqarrqero7wc-dm!cnr.- \ilqg{ q+fuqZq-eru"-qq-ff, arqg{ $s rmrttutstffizzror3TeqeT ffi ,Ttr eH- oTrilir emd &tfrqW s"RreToT Tfl.e.TFrs{qgq qRreffid-.q- fu qT-qrd rnTffio rsqftierfr, dET .rfrenrfrl.- qqg{ q-6r-dm. vh.oTdq-qq e-+r.-iilqgq qe'tirq frrlr erFT.ge< uwfr q)-ms sqgq qfuq,zq-Aqrierfr, ft-o wergo-rq ffi \'q gq ftsT Grfffi q-fir.- qqq,

d riEtrn .rs fr./3.a7' ao/L. q,t e-RftR silcpqtr61ffi, ffi +d q$ ffi w rlane} fR-d at qr qS t r
q-.f,r{- qp}m i

qpf qpfE

vhfuB,12.
'1?

14.
15 to.

q-emfr"qgi-sqefi{ q-aqfrq- q$envrrrm quefuq- qq-ift / q$-e {-ifr, q-grqTfrqGt-fiifrg{ir. q-erqfr-qq+qd 3rHf,rft R-Sr.

rs qffit rs q.ffi t rs e-ffi t os q'm t ossffit

7e:rff,w E-frq-srq-dtrfi

%L

t-l

1r

f? F*s j\:

rt
4 3l
zl

- -)t'

No.PC-V/2009/ACP/2 (P) General Managers The AllZonal Railways & PUs

e"..

regard Sub:-Glarification inE'.''"1 ncialupgradation under MACPSfdll,e promotion. employees whohave refused ad.hoc References from various ZonalRailways havebeenreceived in Board's officeseeking qlfinancial clarification regarding admissibilitv upgladatjgr under MACPS to theemployees whohave promotion. refused ad-hoc Thematter hasbeenexamined in consultation withDoF&T, the nodal department of the Govennment for MACP Scheme it and is clarified thatthe instructions under ACPiMIACP Scherne regarding refusal of promotion is applicable promotions in cases of regular only, Therefore, the promotions employees whohave refused ad-hoc areentitle to grant of financial upgradation under MACPS subject to fulfillment of other terms andconditions as contained in Board's letter of even (RBE dated 10-6-2009 N0,101/2009). number

i"frkens',rt;'f,h

."'$

Dy. Director, ' PayCommission-V Railway Board

r$hnor\Cqicrnl

Or ne.t].\ I ACPS\Adhoc rromn!ion.d.c