Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Au 36
Au 36
36
36
- , , ,
, , ,
, ,
, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glazgov
, Barcelona Strategic Urban Systems, Barselona
, ,
-, ,
, ,
, ,
,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
- , , ,
, , ,
, ,
, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glazgov
, ,
, ,
,
,
, ,
- University College Dublin, School of Geography, Planning and
Environmental Policy, Dablin
,
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
, , , , , , ,
, , , , , ,
,
, , :
XIII. , :
, -
,
11000 , 73/II
: 011/ 3370-091, 3370-185, 3370-203, e-mail: mp@iaus.ac.rs
36
, 2012.
. , .
............................................................................................................................................... .. .
3-12
................................................................................................ ,
13-18
- .................. . , ,
19-26
.....................................
27-35
......................................................................................................................... a
,
36-43
........................... , ,
44-49
- ......................................................................................
50-56
:
..............................................................................
57-67
- .............................................................................. ,
68-73
1863. ............................................................................. .
.
75-84
?
, ...................
85
RESPAG 2013
87
.....................................................................................................................
89
, : ...............................................................................
92
Das Unheimliche /
, : .......................................................
94
In memoriam ....................................
III
,
, ,
,
.
,
,
?
, .
Editorial
When it is a question of urban planning and design in Serbia
in the context of climate change, it is difficult to assess with
certainty to which extent the issue of climate change is
actually present in the current practices; and whether planners
and designers are familiar enough with climate change in
our region, about the potentials for their alleviation, the
vulnerability of settlements and their capability to fight the
challenges of climate change, and finally about the measures
for adaptation and their inevitable consequences. How to direct
the current legislation towards a more efficient implementation
of planning and building regulations, primarily in the areas
that are more exposed to climate impacts, given that there
is still no national strategy for adapting to climate change?
Answers to these complex questions and ever more pressing
issues are given in adequate guidelines for urban planning and
comparative analysis of regional recommendations in the field
of urban planning and the existing legislative framework in
Serbia, as well as in the region.
Mila Pucar
, ,
/
,
.
.
.
,
,
. ,
, ,
.
,
,
.
,* **
: 2012, : 2012.
1.
Disadvantages of the Serbian planning system and
dilemmas about the role of spatial planning in Serbia
mainly is reflected at the local level of spatial planning.
(
The
focus
of
the
spatial
plan
of
the
municipality
from
. the strategic to regulatory role has been shifted by
)
the changes of legal basis. In this paper the key issues
and dilemmas in the practice of preparation and
implementation of the spatial plan of the municipality , ,
/.
.
in Serbia are pointed out. The review of the three key
issues of importance for the direct implementation of
planning solutions and concepts: identification of the
construction zone, the establishment of rules for the
/ . protection, arrangement and construction of physical
.
(natural, landscape and functional) entities and :
settlements, and elaboration of arrangement scheme
for the settlement are presented. It has still not made
:
;
clear
what
the
arrangement
scheme
for
the
settlement
1)
;
should represent, so that in practice there is wide variety
; 2)
of schemes, usually completely unenforceable. Good
,
? (examples of arrangement schemes elaboration within
(,
, 2005; , 2010)
spatial plan of the municipality have been presented
) and analyzed. Suggestions for improving the content of
; 3)
.
the strategic and regulatory elements of the spatial plan
. of the municipality, as well as recommendations to the
basic content of the arrangement scheme for settlement
, as a part of this spatial plan are proposed.
1995, 2003, 2009. 2010. .
Key words: spatial plan of the municipality, strategic
,
and regulatory role, construction zone, rules for the spatial
. protection, arrangement and construction, arrangement
,
scheme
for
settlement
/.
.
(1995)
/.
: /,
(2003, 2009).
,
, ,
* . ,
,
, e-mail: mmaksin@singidunum.ac.rs
** ,
( ), e-mail: nadtanko@yahoo.com
, , 36/2012/ 3-12/
,
,
/
.
( )
/ (2003, 2009), 2003. .
/.
2009.
/
,
.
/. ,
(
), ,
/
.
,
, .
,
,
.
,
,
.
/
.
/ .
/
, ,
.
/.
, ,
.
2.
/
-
;
;
;
,
;
.
, 2003.
., - ,
,
. , ,
/.
, ,
,
.
( ).
/ :
/
;
,
;
.
/,
,
.
.
,
, ,
,
.
/,
,
, , 36/2012/ 3-12/
. ?
?
.
,
, .
/
,
e
/
,
.
()
,
()
.
/,
, ,
, ,
.
,
,
1:25.000,
.
,
.
,
, ,
.
, , ,
.
( ,
, .),
.
, ,
,
:
,
,
(
);
.
,
, -
,
,
( ),
, , ,
;
( 4 ).
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
.
, -
,
.
, ,
,
( )
, /.
/
,
- (
).
-
,
/
.
,
, , 36/2012/ 3-12/
,
,
, /
.
(
, ,
.),
,
,
/.
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
, .
, ,
,
.
.
3.
/?
(:
) /
,
, .
, ,
(: ,
2010)
:
(, , );
;
,
1:5.000 ( ).
(2011)
.
(2009) (2010)
( )
,
/. ,
/
100
,
- .
/
/ ,
/
1:25.000 (. 1)
.
,
.
/ ,
.
(2011)
,
.
,
( ).
,
(. 23).
:
;
;
;
;
/
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
.
1:5.000,
1:2.500,
.
, , 36/2012/ 3-12/
.1.
/
Fig.1.
First generation of arrangement schemes
for settlements in spatial plan of the
municipality
, ,
.
,
(. 2 3).
( ).
( )
,
,
. (. 3).
,
.
,
. (. 3)
,
.
,
3 m ,
,
.
/
,
:
,
,
, 2011.
Source:
Arrangement schemes for Ravanica and
Cukojevac settlements, Spatial Plan of
Kraljevo Municipality, Draft version, Agency
for Planning and Construction of Kraljevo
Municipality, 2011.
.
(
)
( ) ,
.
.
, .
.
,
.
,
, . (. 3),
,
.
, , 36/2012/ 3-12/
. 2.
/
Fig. 2.
Second generation of arrangement schemes for
settlements in spatial plan of the municipality
:
,
, , 2011.
Source:
Arrangement schemes for Krvije and Oreskovica settlements, Spatial Plan of Petrovac na Mlavi
Municipality, Draft version, INFOPLAN, 2011.
4.
/
( ) ,
,
.
.
,
.
(,
2010):
1.
,
, , ;
2. ,
, :
o
,
;
;
.
,
,
,
/.
/
: ,
,
.
, /
, , .,
, . (.
)
(, , .)
, , ,
.
:
1.
810
, (24 .);
;
;
, , 36/2012/ 3-12/
.3.
/
Fig.3.
Improved second generation of arrangement schemes for
settlements in spatial plan of the municipality
:
, ,
, , 2012.
Source:
Arrangement schemes for Rajcinovice, Lukare and Lukarsko Gosevo settlements,
Spatial Plan of Novi Pazar Municipality, Assembly of Novi Pazar Municipality, 2012.
;
,
, ;
2.
;
, (
, ) ;
.
,
, /
,
,
,
.
:
, , ,
;
, ,
,
;
,
, .
, .
,
,
,
.
,
/ .
:
;
,
;
.
(
)
/
.
, .
,
:
1.
,
,
.
, ,
, , 36/2012/ 3-12/
10
.
.
2.
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
.
3.
.
.
,
.
.
, . ,
.
/
(. 4),
, .
/
,
.
, ,
,
.
(
,
).
,
/
.
.
, ,
/
,
.
.
1:2.500,
.
,
.
,
.,
.
,
( )
( ) ,
()
(2011).
, ,
, .
.
,
.
.
, ,
,
(
).
,
.
,
-
, , 36/2012/ 3-12/
. 4.
Fig. 4.
The main content of arrangement scheme for
settlement in spatial plan of the municipality
:
,
, , 2012.
Source:
Arrangement schemes for Valjevska Kamenica and Lelic settlements, Spatial Plan of
Valjevo Municipality, Draft version, Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning
of Serbia, 2012.
,
, ,
.
aeaj,
.
,
( o o aeaj,
, 2011)
/
.
,
.
.
, /
.
, , ,
,
.
(, , ),
, .
5.
(1995)
/ (2009).
,
,
.
2003. .
: 1)
; 2)
, ,
,
.
11
, , 36/2012/ 3-12/
12
/
,
.
.
/
/. ,
.
/ ,
.
.
,
.
/
, .
.
.
: ;
;
;
(
, )
/ ;
,
;
; ;
.
: 1)
,
/
; 2)
(
),
; 3)
. ,
.
,
o aeaj,
.
,
/
.
,
,
.
. *, **, ***
: 2012, : 2012.
Abstract
Sustainable development has become lately
exploited very topic. It is with those who know ,
.
and who do not understand its principles. It is very
.
,
few people under the sustainable development
.
imply uniformity of economic development,
,
social and human promotion and protection and
enhancement of the environment. Economists
,
. ,
push for sustainable economic development, social
scientists and humanists perceive that sustainable
.
,
development is actually more humane society,
.
,
while ecologists people mean the promotion
,
of environmental ethics and environmental
protection. Model of sustainability must be based
.
on integrity not only of the three segments of the
,
.
human life. He has to deal with improving the
quality of human life, and quality of life is not in an
.
,
unhealthy environment, in an unhealthy society,
or in a poorly developed economy. Here we must
involve technical and technological developments
.
that support the development of all three, but it
,
must be cost-effective, socially acceptable and
,
environmentally sound. It is especially important
,
to accept that the whole society and public
. ,
,
. participation in the creation of development ,
policy imperative for the success of the concept
,
of sustainable development. A special place in
this model has a policy, which should be based on
,
.
behavior, but on the organization of an optimal
,
quality of life for all residents. Therefore, the ,
.
economic, social and environmental policies can
not be separated segments have to be the common
,
.
consensus of policy makers.
,
Keywords: ecology, economics, ethics, social
-
development, technical and technological
.
13
. , , 36/2012/ 13-18,
,
, , ,
,
.
,
( , ,
.),
( ,
.).
,
, , .
, ()
.
, ,
. ,
,
.
14
2. ()
:
( )
;
;
;
.
- :
( )
;
, ,
, ;
(,
, , , );
.
:
(
,
, .);
(, ,
, , .);
;
.
-
:
(. .);
;
;
;
;
(
, ) .
-
.
:
,
;
( )
.
2.1.
,
. ,
, (
, ),
.,
,
.
,
.
, ,
. ,
,
.
. ,
( ,
") .
, ,
,
,
,
,
.
.
.
,
. , , 36/2012/ 13-18,
.
, , ,
, ,
.
,
,
, ,
,
. ,
,
.
.
, (
),
, .
,
,
(
),
. ,
,
, ,
,
,
.
6.
,
.
,
.
,
- . ,
(, , ,
.),
.
,
.
() ,
.
,
, ,
, .
( ),
, ,
,
, ,
.
.
, , ,
.
(
, , )
.
, ,
,
.
()
.
( , ,
, , ,
.).
,
.
.
,
.
.
. ,
.
.
, ,
.
.
,
,
, ,
.
3.
,
, , .
,
.
,
.
.
(
, 1987)
,
: ... ,
15
. , , 36/2012/ 13-18,
, ,
, ,
.
(IUCN, WWF UNEP, 1991)
:
.
, , .
. ,
.
. ,
.
,
,
.
, , , ,
,
.
.
:
;
;
;
;
;
, , ,
;
;
;
, , ;
-
.
16
,
,
, ,
.
, ()
.
,
,
,
.
()
,
(ICLEI, 1995).
,
, ,
,
.
,
, ,
. , ,
,
(
), ,
,
.
,
() ,
(), , -
. , ,
( ,
, , , ,
.),
.
,
, .
,
. , , 36/2012/ 13-18,
.
-
( )
.
,
. ,
,
,
.
,
,
.
.
.
,
,
.
,
. ,
,
.
, ,
,
.
3.1.
, ,
, , ,
,
.
:
-
.
,
,
.
, ,
.
,
,
,
,
.
,
, ,
.
,
, ,
.
. ,
,
, ,
, ,
.
, .
,
.
,
. ,
: ,
, ,
, , (,
, ).
3.2.
.
.
,
(
),
.
, .
(
.).
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
.
17
. , , 36/2012/ 13-18,
,
,
.
.
,
.
.
( )
,
.
, ,
.
,
.
.
18
:
1. Breheny, M. (1994): Defining Sustainable Local Development,
Discusion Paper, No. 23, Department of Geography, University
of Reading, UK
2. Cobb, C. (1995): Imagery and Indicators, in: A. MacGillivray
(Ed.). Accounting for Change, Papers from an international
seminar at Toynbee Hall, London, New Economics Foundation
3. Commission on Social Justice (1994): Social Justice Strategies for
National Renewal, Report of the Commission on Sovial Justice,
London, Vintage
4. Daly, H. & J. Cobb (1990): For the Common Good, Boston,
Beacon Press
5. Douthwaite, R. (1992): The Growth Illusion, Bideford, Green
Books
6. Fife Regional Council, (1995): Sustainability Indicators for Fife,
Glenrots
7. Goodman, A. & S. Webb (1994): For Richer, For Poorer. The
changing distribution of income in the UK. 1961-91, London,
Institute of Fiscal Studies
8. Hillary, R. (1996): Environmental Management Systems and
Cleaner Production, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons
9. Hogett, P. (1995): Does local government vant local demokracy?
Town and Countri Planning, No. 64 (4)
10.Hunt, D., C. Johnson (1995): Environmental Management
Sistems, principles an practice, London, McGrow Hils
11.International Council for Local Environment Initiatives (1995):
Local Agenda 21 Planing Guide (Draft), Toronto, ICLEI
12.Jacksonville Community Council inc. (1993): Life in Jacksonville.
Quality indicators for progress, Jacksonville, JCCI
11. Ljeevi M. & D. Filipovi (1995): Environmental Information
System as the Basis of Environmental Protection in Serbia,
International Journal Computers, Environment and Urban
Systems, Vol. 19, No. 2, Elsevier Science, Pergamon Press, New
York, pp.123130.
*
: 2012, : 2012.
for sustainable development
,
, ,
on the example of detailed
,
,
regulation
"Stanko
,
Vlasotinanin"
in
Nis
,
.
,
Abstract
,
,
:
In order to protect the environment and creation
,
(
the conditions for a good and healthy life, the
.
)
construction of buildings should be sustainable. It
?
, is essential that the entire process that includes
* ,
.
, 1, ,
e-mail:obradovic.tanja@gmail.com
19
. , 36/2012/ 19-26/ .
. ,
,
, ,
.
. .
.
, , .
,
( )
,
, .
, ()
.
20
,
.
(),
( , 1999).
.
,
3 (environment,
economy, equity),
, .
,
,
,
, ,
.
(, 1994).
,
,
(, , 2006).
,
,
.
(, 2003).
,
.
,
,
.
, ,
.
,
, .
,
, .
( )
.
, .
.
.
,
.
.
:
(
) . ,
,
,
,
(, , .).
, ,
, .
, ,
,
.
,
. ,
, , , ,
, . ,
.
, , .
,
, .
. , 36/2012/ 19-26/ .
,
. oo aaa
ooae ojeje aeo aao ojea
e oe aee aee, ae
oea.
.
, .
. ,
80 85%.
.
,
(, 2000).
,
,
.
, ,
, ,
.
, ,
.
,
. ,
,
.
,
, .
( ,
),
.
,
10 20%
(
), .
, ,
.
. .
.
.
,
.
, ,
, ,
, .
,
.
: , ,
, . (, 2000).
, :
, .
: ,
, .
,
. ,
,
,
.
,
,
. , ,
.
,
. .
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
,
.
(, .),
, ,
.
,
21
. , 36/2012/ 19-26/ .
.
.
,
.
.
( : ),
() .
4
,
.
,
,
.
1995
2010.
: 200250 /ha,
.
()
.
22
. 1.
Fig. 1.
Purpose of use division into blocks
. 3.
4
Fig. 3.
Block A4 Purpose of use
.
: ,
, , ,
, , ,
,
, , .
(, 1994).
,
,
,
, .
,
.
1,
0,81 ha, 2, 0,81 ha,
, 3, 0,61 ha,
4, 1,28 ha, - (. 1).
4
.
: ,
( )
.
. 2.
4
Fig. 2.
Block A4 Regulatory and nivellization solution
. , 36/2012/ 19-26/ .
.
,
.
,
.
, ,
,
14. .
.
(. 2).
,
,
. ,
(. 3)
-
.
,
(
).
.
. 4.
4
Fig. 4.
Block A4 Review of green spaces
, , ,
,
. ,
.
,
, ,
.
( 3)
( ),
.
35
130 .
,
,
( )
,
.
, , ,
. ,
.
,
( ) , ,
, ,
(
) .
,
.
,
. (
)
.
,
. 4 :
( ), ,
, (
). ,
.
. 5.
4
Fig. 5.
Block A4 Analysis of floors and location of
planned facilities
23
. , 36/2012/ 19-26/ .
24
, ,
,
. ,
,
( , .).
je 4 (. 4)
.
, (
) .
, ,
.
,
,
.
+3+.
12 ,
(. 5).
,
2,5
( 3).
+3+
.
4 -
14.
(. 6). (
)
,
+3+ ( ) ++8+
.
, +1 +3
.
( ).
(++8+)
,
,
,
.
.
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
.
. 6.
4
()
Fig. 6.
Block A4 Allocation Plan and
position of objects (DUP)
2003. , .
, a ()
,
( : ).
.
, ,
,
(
, ... )
.
(
, )
( ) .
( , .
)
,
.
.
, 2006. .,
. 88,
:
,
(, 2007).
,
( ,
).
.
,
.
, ,
,
. , 36/2012/ 19-26/ .
. , ,
.
.
( ) .
,
. ,
,
,
. ,
. .
.
(
) .
(
, ,
, ), .
.
,
(,
2007).
,
,
.
.
.
,
, ,
.
( )
,
.
.
: land
readjustment, land consolidation, land replotting, land pooling
land redistribution.
, ,
, j
.
, , , .
.
,
(Mller-Jkel 2004).
,
.
,
,
.
. (land
readjustment mass)
( , , ,
.) .
(redistribution mass),
.
de legis,
de facto.
(-)
().
- ,
.
,
.
,
( )
.
. ,
.
, ()
, ,
.
,
.
:
(2009),
(2011) (2011).
,
,
( 109, 109 109)
.
.
.
,
,
,
,
25
. , 36/2012/ 19-26/ .
.
, .
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
.
, ,
, ,
.
,
, .
,
,
26
*
: 2012, : 2012.
Has the concept of a garden city been disturbed urbanism and architecture of the
Professors' colony
, 19.
,
.
1926. . .
.
(Ebenezer Howard)
,
, .
,
, : ,
,
.
, ,
. ,
,
. ,
.
: , a
, , , ,
, a
Abstract
The idea of a garden city, which was formed near the end of the
19th century England, also affected the building of The
Professors colony in the former northeast Belgrade. The
constructions started in 1926, and they were completed during
the initial months of the following year. Our intention was to
consider the urban and social influence of the garden cities idea
to the Belgrade colony, through critical contents. The fact we
support in the text, is that the primary plan of Ebenezer Howards
had been realized here, only it resembled Hempsted (near
London) more than the garden cities soon to come. The
professors colony, build to match the ideas of the garden cities,
contained formal elements: radial, diagonal and arched streets,
semi and full circled squares, as well as irregular parcels and
blocks. Primarily conceived as London suburbs that are now
those of Belgrade, today they are blended in with the
environment, and represent elite neighborhoods with a wealthy
population. There are differences between the two examples
that are reflected in Hempsteads keeping its autonomy as a
whole, with all its needful contents, while the colony is just a
settlement, still dependent on the city to tend to its needs. Also,
in our work, we keep track of individual edifices, built in the
spirit of modern architecture in the Professors colony.
Key words: Ebenezer Howard, the architect Svetozar Jovanovic,
the Professors colony, Hempsted, urbanism, garden city, modern
architecture
27
* -
e-mail: bojanbo7@gmail.com
, ,
.
(1850-1928) 19. : ,
. , 1923. .,
(Jan Dubovy, 18921969).1
, 1923. .,
, ,
, . ,
, ,
. 1926. . ,
, ,
, .2
.
,
,3 ,
, .4
1926. . .
28
. 1.
,
Fig. 1.
The Professors colony panorama,
the authors photo
, 3, ; . (2001): , ,
, , .128132, 136138.
2
. (2009): , A, , . 64.
3
(1882 ()1971 ()). 1901. . 1905. . .
, 1912. . ,
1923. . , , ,
1955. . 1955. . ,
1967. . 1926. . (1899 ()1980 ()). 1923. .,
1930. . . - 1932. . ,
. 9 ,
, 19361938. . (1899 ()1991 ()
, . ,
1925. , . ,
, (, ) . -
1982. . .
: . . (2008): , , ; . ,
, 1979., . 74; . (1996): , , ; . . (2005):
, 2, , , . 1059; . (2008): , , , . 181; . ,
, 2009, . 47.
4
. (2010): , ( 25) , , . 54.
(
).5 ,
,
, (Robert Owen, 17711858)
.
19. ,
( , 1842-1921).
,
.6
32. 000 , 2. 000
, ,
.
, .
.
400 a,
. :
1898. .,
1902. .
(William Hesketh Lever, 1851-1925) (Geoege
Cadbury, 1839-1922)
.
.
(Ralph Neville, 1858-1918),
Garden City Association
20.000.00 .7
(Raymond Unwin, 18631940) (Barry
Parker, 18671947).
5
,
.
,
: ,
( ) .
,
,
.
,
19. ,
.
1923. .
( . ),
, ,
, .
,
.
, .
,
, : ,
, ,
.8
,
.
,
, ,
(. 1).
,
,
.
,
H. Ebenezer (1898): To-Morrow: a Peacful Path to a Real Reform, London; Howard Ebenezer (1902): Garden Sities of To-Morrow, London
H. Ebenezer, ; , , . 11.
7
. 22.
8
. (1999): , 45 46, , . 72.
6
29
, 36/2012/ 27-35/
.9
,
, ,
1923. ., .
,
, a .10
,
(. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6).
,
,
, .
,
500.000. ,
,
.
, ,
.
. 2.
,
Fig. 2.
Charlie Chaplins street,
from the collection of
Milo Jurii
. 3., 4.
,
Fig. 3., 4.
Charlie Chaplins street, from the collection of
Milo Jurii
. 5.
,
Fig. 5.
Cvijieva from Jae Prodanovia, from
the collection of Milo Jurii
30
9
10
. , . . (1971): , , 3, , , . 7182.
. (1971): , , , . 84.
, 36/2012/ 27-36/
. 6.
,
Fig. 6.
Stojana Novakovia, from the collection of
Milo Jurii
, , .
,
,
. ,
, , ,
, , , .11
, 1927. .
11
12
, ,
.
,
,
, -, ,
, ,
. 12
. , . . 73, 74.
(18881957), , ; (18891970), ,
; (18911975), , ; (18881948), ,
; (18651946), , - ; (1886
1974), , ; (18881987), , ;
(18941965), , ; (18841965), , ;
(18721957), , ; (18941960), , ;
(19741944), , , ; (18961977), ,
; (18951977), , ; (18821971), ,
; (18971981), , - , ;
(18921989), , ; (18681947), , ; (18881980), , ; (18831975), ,
; (18891972), , , ; (?- 1944), ,
- ; (18791958), , , ;
(18921945), , - ; (18881977), ,
; (18891977), , , ; (18921982), ,
; . (18731935), , , ; (1863
1944), , , ; (18871941), ,
; (18941965), , ; (18681939),
, ; , , ; (18721961), ,
; (18751973), , ; (18921974), ,
, ; (18851954), , ;
(18911946), , ; (18921932), , ;
(18851941), , ; (18871968), ,
(18981965), , , .
31
, 36/2012/ 27-35/
23 a,
7 a.13
,
.
. (. 7, 8, 9).
, .
: .
, ,
, ,
: , ,
.
.
.
.
,
.14
,
, ,
.15
. ,
.16
, ,
. K
, .
. 7.
,
Fig. 7.
Stojana Novakovia, the authors photo
. 8.
,
Fig. 8.
Jae Prodanovia and Stojana Novakovia, the authors photo
32
. 9.
,
Fig. 9.
Stojana Novakovia, the authors photo
. 10.
3,
Fig. 10.
Ilirska 3, the authors photo
13
. , . , . 75.
. , . . 5456.
15
. 57.
16
. 60.
14
, 36/2012/ 27-35/
,
,17
24 .
,
,
,
.
,
.
18
,
, .
, ,
. 11.
,
Fig. 11.
Ljube Stojanovia, the authors photo
-,19 , ,
20,
" " .20
,
1930. . 1928. .,
(. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14).
,
, .
9, .
.
, ,
3, ,
.
. 12.
9,
Fig. 12.
Osmana ikia 9, the authors photo
. 13
20,
Fig. 13.
Osmana ikia 20, the authors photo
. 14.
24,
Fig. 14.
Osmana ikia 24, the authors photo
17
. (1979): , , . 39.
. (1991): , 38, , . 145168.
19
1928. . ,
, , , , 1934. .
20
. (2010): , 68, , . 187.
18
33
, 36/2012/ 27-36/
, 19471948. . ,
,
(. 15). .
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
,
.21
34
, ,
,
, .
, ,
,
.22
(
),
, .
,
, ,
. , ,
,
, .
,23
. 6,5
.
21
. 15.
,
, www. Bing. com /maps/
Fig.15.
Workers pavilion, the aeroplane
photo, www. Bing. com /maps/
, ,
, . , ,
.
,
. ,
.
,
.
,
.24
,
(. 16, 17, 18, 19).
, ,
.
,
. .
,
.
22
. , . , 26.
23
Wikipedia, Hempstead
24
, 36/2012/ 27-35/
. 16.
Hampsted. Wikipedia
. 17.
Hampsted. Keats house, entrance, Wikipedia
( a ),
,
.
,
1945. .,
.
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
.
,
, ,
.
,
, ,
.
,
.
.
,
,
,
, ,
.
. 18.
Hampsted. Hempstead under
ground, Wikipedia
. 19.
Hampsted. Wikipedia
,
,
,
,
.
:
Bojani, B. (2010): Iskustva urbanizma moderne sa osvrtom na
Profesorsku koloniju, DaNS 68, str. 66.
Bogunovi, G. S. (2005): Arhitektonska enciklopedija Beograda,
Knjiga 2, Beograd, Beogradska knjiga
Dimi, M. (1998, 1999): Profesorska kolonija, GMGB 45-46, str.
73,74.
urevi, M. (1996): Petar i Branko Krsti, Beograd, RZZSK
urevi, M. (1991): ivot i delo arhitekte Milana Zlokovia,
GMGB 38, str. 145168.
Jovanovi Stojimirovi, M. (1971): Siluete starog Beograda,
Beograd, Prosveta
Kamili, V. (2010): Svetozar Jovanovi, (master rad 25), Beograd,
Filozofski fakultet
Maksimovi B., B. Koji, B. Nestorovi, (1971): Istorija Beograda,
Dvadeseti vek, Knjiga 3, Beograd, Prosveta, str. 7182.
Markovi, R. I. (2007): Zgrada Ministarstva saobraaja u Beogradu
arhitekte Svetozara Jovanovia, GMGB 54, str. 197216.
Manevi, Z. (1981): Jan Dubovi Nai neimari, Izgradnja 3.
Manevi, Z. (1979): Pojava moderne arhitekture u Srbiji,
(doktorska disertacija), Beograd, Filozofski fakultet
Manevi, Z. (2008): Leksikon srpskih neimara, Beograd,
Graevinska knjiga
Milainovi Mari, D. (2001): Arhitekta Jan Dubovi, Beograd,
Zadubina Andrejevi
Ebenezer, H. (1898): To-Morrow: a Peacful Path to a Real Reform,
London
Ebenezer, H. (1902), Garden Sities of To-Morrow, London
orovi, D. (2009): Vrtni grad u Beogradu, Beograd, Zadubina
Andrejevi
http://www. Wikipedia, Hempstead
35
*, *, *
: 2012, : 2012.
36
Abstract
* , ,
3, 21000
, , , 36/2012/ 36-43/ ,
1897. .,
,
, .
193 m - ,
24,6 300 l/min.
1910. . 1914.
,
15.000
.
1911. .,
( , 1999). ,
.
, , 1931.
. 43 ,
, ,
: , , ,
, (, 1933).
1945. .,
, . ,
1963. .,
-,
(, 1982).
,
, , -
(, 1978). 1977. ,
. ,
, 1986. .
( , 2007).
. 1.
Map No.1.
State of the structures and surfaces of J odna spa area
: ,
: ,
, ,
,
, ,
, ,
, .
.
:
, , ,
.
,
.
,
, .
.
0,94 ha (. 1).
(. 1).
, .
,
, .
,
,
(, 1991).
,
.
(. 2). ,
,
, .
45 ,
. ,
(. ).
37
, , , 36/2012/ 36-43/ ,
XX ,
.
(. 3).
(. 4),
, .
-, ,
.
.
1977. ., .
,
. ,
, (
, 2005).
,
,
,
.
.
.1.
.2.
.3.
38
.4.
, - ,
(. 5). 48.000 m2 (. 1)
(, ), ,
, 5.000 m2,
.
, .
.
, ,
, ( , 2000).
, , , 36/2012/ 36-43/ ,
-
, , ,
.
. 1.
e
e
Table No. 1.
Surfaces of Jodna spa and its purpose
: , 2005,
, 2000.
. .
8,71 h
0,21 h
0,94 h
3,45 h
4,8 h
.5.
.6.
.7.
.8.
(. 6). 1961. .,
1981. . ,
22.000 m2 ,
( , 2005).
3,45 ha (. 1).
2004. .,
, 5 .
222 , , ,
, , 7
1200 ,
, , ,
.
1910. .,
( -, 1987).
39
, , , 36/2012/ 36-43/ ,
, .
.
,
, ,
, ,
. 1910. ,
(- , 2008).
85.285 m2,
57.440 m2, 14.720 m2, 1.000 m2,
650 m2 124 m2.
, 2.680 m2 ,
, 1.434,85 m2.
, ,
, 46.381 m2 (
, 2005). 8,71 h (. 1).
-, -,
, -, - ,
( , .
23/2005), 3. .
, .
,
, , .
(, ,
) ,
.
,
, (.
7).
- ,
, (. 8).
,
(. 9).
.9.
40
,
, . ,
, , , ,
, , ,
. , 1945. .
, ,
.
, ,
.
. ,
. ,
.
(
, 2009).
(
, 18/2005)
(
, 11/2000, 14/2007),
2021.
( , 39/2006).
,
1976. .
,
-
, .
,
, 2 6 m
.
, ,
.10.
, , , 36/2012/ 36-43/ ,
, ,
, ,
, .
,
150 .
(
) (
),
. ,
,
, ,
,
,
.
( )
,
, .
,
.
,
.
,
.
1964. .,
-
,
. ,
,
.
,
,
,
(,
, 1999).
, ,
.
,
.
,
,
, .
, ,
-
,
,
. ,
- ,
2108 m2, .
,
-a ,
.
,
,
,
. ,
,
,
-a
2010. ., je
(. 10).
+1+, ,
-
,
, .
,
,
,
.
, ,
,
. ,
,
,
.
, :
, , ,
. ,
,
,
, .
, ,
,
, , (
-)
.
41
, , , 36/2012/ 36-43/ ,
. 2.
Map No. 2. Detailed regulation plan of Futoki park in Novi Sad
: , 2005,
, . 23/2005.
42
,
, .
,
,
, .
,
- .
- ,
.
,
,
(
) .
,
,
,
. , , ,
,
a
,
.
,
a
.
,
, ,
,
.
-
, , ,
, .
, , -
, , , 36/2012/ 36-43/ ,
,
.
, , ,
,
, .
, ,
,
,
-
,
, .
, ,
,
,
,
, .
,
, ,
,
.
43
*
: 2012, : 2012.
44
SUBOTICA
:
Abstract:
During the negotiations between Austria and Hungary
in 1867 when dual Austro-Hungarian Monarchy was
formed, the question of the central bank was not
, touched to prevent further complications. In 1878,
after years of prolonged negotiations, the central bank
. was successfully transformed into an institute in which
Austria and Hungary had an equal share. The "Austro
Hungarian Bank" acted as a central bank for both parts
.
of the Empire. The dualistic character of the institute
20.
was characterized by two managements and two head
,
offices in Vienna and Budapest. During first decade of
20th century it was built few dozens of bank buildings
(Jzsef Hubert).
in Hungary and the most important: the central AustroHungarian Bank building in Budapest on Szabadsg tr
8. Bank building in Budapest was built according to the
design made by Ignc Alpr who won the competition.
, ,
Most of the other bank buildings built throughout
Hungary were designed by architect Jzsef Hubert,
(Raichl J. Ferenc) 1901. .
but Austro-Hungarian bank building in Subotica was
designed by architect Ferenc Jzsef Raichl in 1901. Main
topic of this paper is research of architecture of Austro ,
Hungarian Bank Building in Subotica. It is obvious,
,
although smaller in size, that the building was designed
according to the main concept of the central bank
,
building in Budapest. Compositions of the both facade
applied similar architectural elements, like pillars,
projections, attics, plinth and also decorative elements
that symbolizes the function of a building. Inner
.
organization of space also corresponds to each other,
in both buildings: beside offices there were several
apartments for renting. In contrast to other bank
buildings in Hungary designed by Jzsef Hubert, bank
building in Subotica, although made according to the
concept of Central Bank building in Budapest represents
remarkable and unique architectural masterpiece
including all: architectural composition, decorative
elements and function of a building.
Key words: architecture, Austro-Hungarian Monarchy,
art nouveu, bank building, Subotica
.
: ,
, , ,
-
19. ,
,
1848. .
,
.
.
,
,
1848. ., 1867. .
:
.
.2
,
.
,
1878. .
.
.
* . , , , 2, , e-mail: vikica@yunord.net
-
36042, .
2
Pter H. (1995): Povijest Maarske, Zagreb, Barbat, str. 155156.
1
, 36/2012/ 44-49/
: .
e e.3
. ,
(fl), , 1900. .
.
.
, ,
.
,
, ,
19. .
.
,
. 1905. . 14
.4
1878. .,
20. .
3 (Jzsef Ndor tr 3),
. ,
,
(Szabadsg tr).
1900. . 8
8
. 8.5 1901. .
(Alpr Ignc).6 ,
. ,
.
,
.
.7
,
, ,
,
1890. .8
1902.
., 1905. . (. 1) ,
.
.
.
, ,
.
(Kroly Sennyei).
: ;
; ;
; ;
; , ; ,
, ;
.9 ,
.
http://www.oenb.at/en/ueber_die_oenb/bankh_archiv/geschichte_der_oenb/1878_bis_1922/18781922.jsp, 18.09.2012. 8 45 .
Zdori J. (1996): The Buildings of the National Bank of Hungary, Budapest, TDI Promotion Agency, . 4.
5
, , : (Alpr Ignc), (Hubert Jzsef), (Krssy Albert),
(Lechner dn) (Baumhorn Lipt), (Korb s Giergl), (Schannen Ern),
o : (Fellner und Helmer), Ka (Karl Knig), (Friedrich Schachner),
(Otto Wagner), (Ludwig Baumann), (Franz von Krauss) (Ludvig Richter). Gerle J. (1994): Palaces of Money,
Budapest, Municipality of Budapest., str. 31.
6
(18551928) . . Gerle J., A. Kovcs, I.
Makovecz, (1990): A szzadfordul magyar ptszete, Budapest, Szpirodalmi knyvkiad Bonex, . 1920.
7
Zdori J. (1996): The Buildings of the National Bank of Hungary, Budapest, TDI Promotion Agency, . 12.
8
, . . (2004): 1868. 1900. ( ), , 14
15, , , . 7880.
9
Rday, M. (1998): Jelenetek a Pesti Utcn, Budapest: Karinthy kiad, . 5055.
4
<?>
45
, 36/2012/ 44-49/
.1.
Fig. 1.
Austro-Hungarian Bank building in Budapest
(Rna Jzsef).
.
(Markup Bla)
, ,
.
46
,
,
. 1901.
. -
, 1905. , 1908. ,
1909. , 1910. 1912. .
.
(18461916).
,
,
,
. ,
,
.
, ,
.
1904. .,
. 1905. .
.
,
,
, ,
, ,
y ,
.
, , , .
,
,
, ,
, ,
.
,
.
32
.
,
,
1901. .
, .10
,
,
, ,
.
.
j , ,
.
. (. 2)11
, 36/2012/ 44-49/
.2.
Fig. 2.
Austro-Hungarian Bank Building in Subotica
, eg 1921. .
,
,
,
20. : Der
Architekt. (. 3)12
: ,
,
.
, , 1921.
., , 4 ,
, .13
: , , ,
, , ,
. ,
, ,
.
,
.
.3.
Der Architekt VIII, Jahrgang 1901.
( , F : 47. in. 1047/1921.)
Fig. 3.
Ferenc Raichls design of Austro-Hungarian Bank building in Subotica
publushed in magazin Der Architekt VIII, Jahrgang 1901 in Vienna
(Historical Archive Subotica, F : 47. in. 1047/1921.)
, ,
.
,
, 1921. . 1.257.100.000
.14
,
.
.
1905. .
.
,
. 15,
,
1902. ., ,
, ,
, 1904. .,
10
47
, 36/2012/ 44-49/
. 4.
Fig. 4.
Sunflower detail on the facade of AustroHungarian Bank building in Subotica
48
. 5.
Fig. 5.
Detail of Mercurius head on the facade of
Austro-Hungarian Bank building in Subotica
( . 13),
(Komor Marcell) (Jakab Dezs).15
,
. ,
,
, .
,
, .
,
,
.
,
. ,
,
. , 50%
.16
.
15
. 6.
Fig. 6.
Door handle on the entrance door of the AustroHungarian bank building in Subotica
,
.
,
, ,
,
,
.
(. 4),
, .
,
. , ,
,
,
. (. 6)
, .
, , ,
, ,
, .
. (. 5)
, . . (1988): , , , . 3441.
, . (2002): , (, . .), , ,
Kijrat kiad, . 7.
17
, . (2010): XVIII XIX , , . 29, ,
, . 2229.
16
, 36/2012/ 44-49/
:
.
,
. ,
, ,
.
,
19.
20. .
, ,
.
,
.
.
,
.
,
, 1899. .
,
.
,
. ,
,
.
:
Aladi, V. (2010): Razvoj koncepta unutranjeg grada Subotice
u XVIII i XIX veku, Arhitektura i urbanizam, br. 29, Beograd:
Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije, str. 2229.
Duranci, B. (2005): Arhitektura secesije u Vojvodini, Subotica,
Grafoprodukt
Gerle, J., A. Kovcs, I. Makovecz, (1990): A szzadfordul magyar
ptszete, Budapest: Szpirodalmi knyvkiad Bonex.
Gerle, J. (1994): Palaces of Money, Budapest, Municipality of
Budapest
Hanak, P. (1995): Povijest Maarske, Zagreb, Barbat
Grlica, M. (2002): Secesijska Subotica Grad kontrasta, (Krsti,
B. ur.) Secesija u Subotici, Subotica Budimpeta: Knjievna
zajednica Subotica Kijrat kiad
20. .
,
.
,17
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
, : , ,
.
, ,
,
,
. ,
,
,
. ,
, ,
,
.
49
M :
1
*
: 2012, : 2012.
50
:
.
,
-
.
.
. ,
.
.
,
,
. ,
,
.
.
,
.
,
.
: , ,
,
1
, 36/2012/ 50-56/ m :
,
(IPCC, 2007; UNECE, 2007b; SEEFCCA, 2012).
, ,
.
(,
, , , , , ,
.)
() 200 (RS
MEMSP, 2010; SEEFCCA, 2012).
,
,
(ENVSEC, 2012).
2006. .,
,
.
(UNFCCC, 2010).
(IPCC)
(IPCC, 2007).
,
, (IPCC,
2007).
(IPCC)
2012. .,
,
,
. ,
, ,
,
,
(IPCC, 2012).
,
.
.
,
,
(RCC, 2008).
,
.
,
.
. ,
,
. ,
(IPCC, 2007; IPCC, 2012). ,
,
.
, , ,
,
-
(Burton et al., 2002). ,
, , , ,
(Fssel, 2007, 267). ,
51
, 36/2012/ 50-56/ m :
52
,
,
(IPCC,
2007).
.
.
, ,
.
:
,
.
(Adger et al., 2005).
,
(Burton et al., 2002).
, , ,
(Burton ., 2002; Wilson,
2006).
. ,
, ,
.
(Peltonen, 2006).
,
(IAIA, 2005; EEA, 2012).
:
.
,
(Lazarevic Bajec, 2011).
,
,
.
,
. ,
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
(IPCC, 2007).
,
,
.
(Brooks, 2003).
. ,
,
( -- -). ,
.
,
.
,
--,
,
(Lazarevi Bajec, Maruna, 2011). ,
,
(Fssel, 2007).
,
(Lazarevic Bajec, 2011).
.
.
,
,
(Stanilov, 2007). ,
, 36/2012/ 50-56/ m :
,
, .
,
(, 2002).
,
, ,
.
,
.
+20
, , , ,
,
.
,
(UNDP/
UNEP, 2012). ,
,
.
(UNECE)
,
,
.
,
(UNFCCC, 2010),
.
,
.
: 1)
, ; 2)
(UNECE,
2007a).
(UNFCCC) (RCC, 2008).
-,
.
, ,
, , ,
.
,
, ,
(
)
(RCC, 2008).
(SEEFCCA)
.
,
.
.
,
(SEEFCCA, 2012).
(UNDP, 2009)
,
.
:
;
;
;
;
;
;
-; ,
;
; ;
.
,
,
, ,
, .
(UNDP, 2009).
53
, 36/2012/ 50-56/ m :
54
,
,
,
(Lazarevi Bajec, 2011; ,
, , 2011).
(2001)
.
2008. .
,
,
2004. .
,
2010. .
,
,
: 2008. .
2010.
. ,
.
, ,
, , .
,
, ,
,
(RS MEMSP, 2010).
,
2015. (2004).,
(2006),
(2010), (2011)
.
,
,
.
2010. .
,
. ,
,
,
,
(Lazarevi Bajec, 2011).
.
, ,
(, 2010).
,
,
.
, , ,
. , ,
(, 2009; , 2009; , 2010) .
2011. .,
,
.
, :
,
- .
,
,
, (, 2011,
3).
,
.
.
,
,
(, 2011, 9).
.
, 36/2012/ 50-56/ m :
.
.
.
.
.
,
. ,
,
.
,
.
, .
, ,
, .
,
,
.
.
.
.
, .
2010. e.
,
. ,
,
, .
, .
,
.
,
--.
.
.
55
, 36/2012/ 50-56/ m :
56
- 1
*, **
: 2012, : 2012.
Abstract
In the recent years, green roofs have become increasingly
important, especially within the context of climate change.
Besides the fact that are contributing to the increasing
of the total urban surface under vegetation, green roofs
are having beneficial effects on the quality and quantity
of storm water, on reducing the effect of the urban heat
island (UHI), the consumption of the energy for cooling and
heating etc.
Taking into account the fact that the development of green
roofs have being increasingly used as measure within
adaptation strategy to climate change, the main aim of
the paper is to present an overview of the contemporary
tendencies within green roofs development. The paper
provides an insight within historical context, existing
framework in terms of policies and programs which are
promoting green roofs development and as well researches
covering the performances of the green roofs. Special
attention is also given to the situation in the Republic
of Serbia. Consequently, one of the conclusions of the
paper stress out the necessity to provide the conditions
for promotion of the green roof development, not only as
a measure but also as a passive cooling technique. In that
sense, the recommendations of the paper are promoting the
revision of the Draft Law on the protection and promotion
of the green spaces, taking into account climate change and
the role of the green infrastructure, developing of the legal
and planning frameworks within spatial and urban planning
which will promote the green roofs development as well
the promotion of the research which will quantified other
positive effects of the green roofs.
Key words: green roofs, climate change, green infrastructure
,
.
,
,
(),
.
,
. ,
,
,
. ,
,
. ,
,
,
.
: , ,
57
* , ...., , , ,
e-mail: tijana@iaus.ac.rs
** , .... - , , ,
, ,
e-mail: sekulic.mirjana55@gmail.com
, ,
,
2011. 2014. .
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
58
1.
,
, ,
, , , , ,
,
2 , ,
. ,
:
, ,
,
, ,
(,
1995, , 2005, ., 2011).
( )
( ) (, ,
...), ,
. ,
, ,
,
( ., 2011).
:
,
, ,
, ,
(Hamin& Gurran, 2009).
20-25%
(Zinzi & Agnoli, 2011) ,
3.
, ,
.
,
,
.
, ,
,
, .
, ,
,
( ) (www.toronto.ca/
greenroofs & www.greenroofs.org).
.
.
5-20 cm
.
, 20
cm, .
,
,
.
,
.
2.
,
,
( ),4
, ,
. (
) .
,
. ,
,
.
: ,
, , , ,
. , -, ,
- ,
(Rudolf,
2002).
,
70%
,
.
.
, ,
, ( , 2011,
. 253).
.
.: ,
, , , ,
() ,
(Solecki et al., 2005).
, ,
, .
. (www.coolroofs.org/HomeandBuildingOwnersInfo.html).
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
. ,
, .
.
, ,
, ,
, .
(Werthmann,
2007:23), a , a
. ,
. (Osmundson, 1999)
,
,
(
, , -
).
, 21.
.
3.
,
.
,
,
, ,
,
, , .
(, 2010). 50%
, 2040. .
70% (UN,
2009). ,
:
, ,
. 1.
e
(: Kazmierczak
& Carter, 2010,
, 2006,
Wong et al., 2003)
,
,
(Dawson, 2007).
, ,
,
, .
()
Sixth
Environmnet Action Programme, Thematic Strategy on Urban
Environmnet, European Landscape Convention, Leipzig Charter,
Aalborg Charter of European Cities and Towns Towards Sustainability
(Hudekova, 2011). , ,
,
, ,
.
,
(Kazmierczak &
Carter, 2010).
3.1. ,
, bottom-up .
2009. .
(Covenant of Mayers)
.
(a 1).
- 60%
5.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- 27% ,
60% , 13% .
.
() ().
( ) , W/m2,
. , .
59
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
,
,
, - .
, ,
, 4
,
19%
2008. 2011. .,
(FBB - Fachvereinigung Bauwerksbegrnung e.V.) 8 10
m2 ,
20 .
(Green Roofs for Healthy Cities
- GRHC) 115% ( m2 )
,
(http://www.greenroofs.com/blog/2012/08).
6,
. ,
,
,
.
()7
(Basel)
(. 1).
,
, 2002. .,
60
. 1.
,
Fig. 1.
Extensive roof garden with photovoltaic modules, Basel
.
.
()8
- (bio-neighbourhood)
(Feanza)
, ,
2009. (European Prize
for Urban and Regional Planning, Challenges 2009).
, , ,
(. 2).
-
, ,
. ,
, ,
( ),
, ,
- , ,
, , .
. 2.
,
Fig. 2.
Intensive roof garden on the roof of the office building, Feanza
: ,
.
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
()
1939. .,
14%
.
1.000 m2
250 m2 20% . (. 3)
, 2.000 (Mikami,
2005).
- 52.428 m2 2001.
., 104.412 m2 2001. . ,
1.200 ha
10% - 35%.
,
(Tokyo Council
Building), .
. 2003. .
,
( 2005. .)
,
, 20% 9.
(. 4). ,
.
,
:
50-80% ,
,
,
,
, .
5.000 m2 ,
.
600
, , (
0.5%
)
, 10 20 .
,
25% 100%
. 2010. . 28
, 62.5
2011-2013. ., 90.5
11.
()
(Copenhagen)
-
2025. 10,
30
,
(
)12
90.000 m2
.
. 3.
Roppongi 26%
,
Fig. 3.
Roppongi Hills has an unprecedented 26% of its land area planted with
vegetation, Tokyo
9
. 4.
Fig. 4.
http://etd.lib.umt.edu/theses/available/etd-06162011-120644/unrestricted/Hodges_Matthew_Professional_Paper_Final.pdf).
10
http://www.igra-orld.com/links_and_downloads/images_dynamic/IGRA_Green_Roof_News_2_2010.pdf
11
http://www.kk.dk/sitecore/content/Subsites/CityOfCopenhagen/SubsiteFrontpage/LivingInCopenhagen/ClimateAndEnvironments.aspx
12
http://www.asla.org/2011awards/080.html-
61
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
. 5.
,
Fig. 5.
City Hall, Chicago
. 6.
99.000m2,
Fig. 6.
Millennium Park roof garden on 99.000m2, Chicago
. 7.
,
Fig. 7.
Green roof Beddington, London
. 8.
Fig. 8.
City Hall`s green roof, Toronto
62
,
.
(Green Roof Grants Program)
2005. .
20 . ,
,
5.000
40
.
,
,
. ,
13
http://www.portlandonline.com/bes/index.cfm?c=44422
. 9.
Fig. 9.
Intensive green roof at the University
Hospital, Basel
,
. (. 5 6)
, -
. 2011. .
- 5
m2 . ,
1
3 m2 m2 ,
35%13. ,
,
.
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
( )14
2000. .
.
(Beddington Zero-Emission
Development)
. (. 7)
,
.
.
, 2008. .,
, , .
(Mayors Climate Change Adaptation Strategy)
100.000 m2
. ,
,
, . , ,
, .
()15
2009. .,
,
, , 2050. .
80%. ,
2009. .,
.
, ,
2.000 m2 ,
6 20 m . (. 8)
.
, ,
.
-,
:
,
, .
50
m2, 100.000
. ,
,
2.000 m2,
2.000 m2. ,
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
(, - . 9)
,
,
, .
,
,
,
.
3.2.
,
.
, , ,
. , ,
14
http://etd.lib.umt.edu/theses/available/etd-06162011-120644/unrestricted/Hodges_Matthew_Professional_Paper_Final.pdf
15
(http://www.toronto.ca/livegreen/greenbusiness_greenroofs_eco-roof.htm)
16
, ,
, (Ottel, 2011).
63
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
. ,
, ,
(extended
long-term model validation)
(Theodosiou, 2003). ,
(Theodosiou, 2003, Yamada, 2008):
; ,
,
.
,
.
, ,
, ;
, ,
.
(,
, , ,
.),
.
.
,
.
(<25 mm)
, .
,
,
.
,
,
,
(Zinzi & Agnoli, 2011).
2.
2.
(Wong et al., 2003, Zinzi & Agnoli, 2011)
20C
80% (2025% );
, , , 34 C .
115% o
1719% .
13% , 264%
100 900 mm;
300 mm
15% , 79% ;
900 mm.
49%.
5257%
4.
(Internacional Panel
for Climate Change IPCC, 2007), :
, ,
, ,
.
,
6C (, 2010).
,
,
, .
64
16
(. , . 72/2009),
, ... ... ,
.
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
( .,
2011).
,
16 , ,
(Crnevi & Baki,
2008). (. ,
. 135/04)
. 10.
, 2007. .
Fig. 10.
The Forum, Ortho-photo
image from 2007.
. 13.
,
Fig. 13.
The Forum, detail of roof garden
17
,
, ,
,
.
,
.
.
2021.
( 2021). 17
- (
. 11.
,
, - 2010. .
Fig. 11.
The Forum, a roof garden at ground
level, Ortho-photo image from 2010.
. 12.
,
,
Fig. 12.
The Forum, roof garden design,
designer Mirjana Sekulic
. 14.
,
,
2009.
Fig. 14.
The Forum, detail of
roof garden, 2009.
, ,
, (Ottel, 2011).
65
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
11.10.6). 2021
60 cm .
,
. .
83: 17% (Minke, G. 2010).
,
(
).
.
. 10 -
. 520 2007.
. , ,
, 2.500 m2,
, ,
(. 1014).
, ,
, ,
.
66
5.
.
,
,
.
, ,
,
.
. ,
:
( ) (
) (
).
,
, :
.
,
,
,
.
,
, , ,
.
:
Dalley, S. (1993): Ancient Mesopotamian gardens and the
identification of the hanging gardens of Babylon resolved,
Garden History, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Summer), pp. 113.
Dunnett, N., N. Kingsbury (2008): Planting green roofs and living
walls, Portland, Timber Press
Dawson, R. (2007): Re-engineering cities: a framework for
adaptation to global change, Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society A, 365, rr. 30853098.
EarthPledge: Green Roofs, Ecological Design And Construction,
Foreword by William McDonough, Atglen, Schiffer B ooks
Zakon o zatiti ivotne sredine, Sl. glasnik RS br.135/04
Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 72/2009
Zinzi, M., S. Agnoli (2011): Cool and green roofs. An energy and
comfort comparison between passive cooling and mitigation
urban heat island techniques for residential buildings in the
Mediterranean region, Energy and buildings, doi: 0.1016/j.
enbuild.2011.09.024
Kazmierczak, A., J. Carter (2010): Adaptation to climate change
using green and blue infrastructure, A database of case studies,
The Interreg IVC Green and Blue Space Adaptation for Urban
Areas and Eco Towns project (GraBS) http://www.grabseu.org/downloads/Case_Studies_Database_Executive_
Summary_FINAL.pdf
Koli, B. (1993): Uticaj uma i vegetacije na klimu i mikroklimu
Banja i klimatskih mesta, Nauni skup: Banje i banjska leilita
u Jugoslaviji, Novi Sad
Mani, B., T. Crnevi, A . Nikovi (2011): Uloga zelenih povrina
u prostorno-funkcionalnoj koncepciji Bloka 23 u Beloj Crkvi,
Arhitektura i urbanizam, 33, str.6774.
Mikami, T. (2005): Tokyo cooling rooftop gardens, In EarthPledge:
Green Roofs, Ecological Design And Construction, Atglen,
Schiffer B ooks, rp. 113116.
Minke, G. (2010): Dcher begrnen - einfach und wirkungsvoll.
Planung, Ausfhrungshinweise und Praxistipps, Freiburg,
kobuch Verlag
Nikoli, M. (2010): Srbija pred izazovom globalnih klimatskih
promena i njihovih posledica, Klimatske promene studije i
analize, Evropski pokret u Srbiji
Osmundson, H. T. (1999): Roof Gardens: History, Design, and
Construction, New York, W.W. Norton & Company
Ottele, M. (2010): Vertical greened surfaces and the potential to
reduce air pollution and the improvement of the insulation value
, , 36/2012/ 57-67/ -
www.g-sky.com/Benefits_EnergySavings_Detailed.aspx
(03.05.2009.)
www.coolroofs.org/HomeandBuildingOwnersInfo.html
(25.10.2012.)
http://www.g-sky.com/Benefits_EnergySavings_Detailed.aspx
(20.03.2009.)
www.toronto.ca/greenroofs & www.greenroofs.org (03.08.2010.)
http://etd.lib.umt.edu/theses/available/etd-06162011-120644/
unrestricted/Hodges_Matthew_Professional_Paper_Final.
pdf (29.10.2012.)
http://w w w.igra- orld.com/links_and_downloads/
images_dynamic/IGRA_Green_Roof_News_2_2010.pdf
(29.10.2012.)
h t t p : / / w w w. k k . d k / s i t e c o r e / c o n t e n t / S u b s i t e s /
CityOfCopenhagen/SubsiteFrontpage/LivingInCopenhagen/
ClimateAndEnvironments.aspx (29.10.2012.)
http://www.asla.org/2011awards/080.html- (09.10.2012.)
http://www.portlandonline.com/bes/index.cfm?c=44422
(09.10.2012.)
http://etd.lib.umt.edu/theses/available/etd-06162011-120644/
unrestricted/Hodges_Matthew_Professional_Paper_Final.
pdf (13.10.2012.)
http://www.toronto.ca/greenroofs/overview.htm (15.10.2012.)
http://www.toronto.ca/livegreen/greenbusiness_greenroofs_
eco-roof.htm (15.10.2012.)
:
.1. Snodgrass, 2010:15
.2. http://www.vertical-italia.it/servizi/ut_pubbli/conten.ph
p?hCodTip=3&hCodAre=REFE&hElTiAr=T
.3. EarthPledge, 2005:68
.4. Cantor, 2008:135
.5. EarthPledge, 2005:124
.6. Snodgrass, 2010:14
.7. EarthPledge, 2005:52
.8. Cantor, 2008:52
.9. Cantor, 2008:92
.10.
.11.
.12.
.13.
.14.
67
1863.
*
: 2012, : 2012.
1862. .
5.700 2.490 .
.
,
( ) 1863. .
,
.
1863. .
1871. . 1891. .
.
.
19.
.
.
,
.
.
: 19. .,
, , ,
68
1.
1863.
., 1862. .
.
5.700
2.490.
.
,
, .
19.
.
,
1891.
.
* ...
Abstract
Urban plan for Uzice from 1863. started urban reforming of
settlement. Historical events in 1862. set the basis: great
fire and emigration of Turks from the city which reduced
number from 5700 to 2490 inhabitants. At the same time,
financial capacity of population weakened and that affected to
dynamics of reconstruction.
Sketch of current state from 1863. represents first geodetic
record of the town. It provides important information about
town state during Turkish occupation. On sketch of current
state after the fire are seen unequal width winding streets,
blocks with irregular borders, streams flowing freely through
town, and, in the town center, a large cemetery which divides
the town and prevents further development.
According to the sketch was made the First regulation proposal
on May 1863. (eng. Emanuel Shefel) which included identical
surface as area destroyed in the fire. With this plan cemetary
located in center was abolished, regulation of river Djetinja and
steam Uremovac was planned, formed two blocks at expense
of river regulation, street routes were straightened, street axle
fractures were planned only in areas of intersections, block
boundaries realigned, blocks got proper geometry, and around
the church and district office was formed a town market
from which poured out the main street carsija. Problems
of this proposalwere that it envisaged small number of town
markets, in relation to economic importance of the town and
inappropriate main street solution.
In order to help in rewriting the plan in the town were sent
engineers Josip Klinar (from Cacak) and Joseph Veseli (from
Loznica). Together with E. Sefel they have made Second plan
proposal: thay have expanded plan intervention to north
(Military Circle), to west (stream Kostica), on cemetary space
were formed two blocks and Knez Milos Market, on west
side the block where was madrassa was reduced and school
building was set on the regulatory line and thereby was
formed Sveti Sava Market, Old market retained all features from
previous proposal, Main Street has changed its route and in the
part just before the Old Market was connected with the street
that leads to Lipa, two parallel roads of same rank spreading
from east to west and north to south were formed, river
Djetinja and steam Uremovac channels were regulated, and
formed Military circle. Town graphic presentation was changed
so that on the drawing all blocks have written side length, and
some streets even width. This proposal was endorsed in 1871.
and remained in force until 1891. The work was made based on
stored archival material and written sources.
. 1.
, , (. ) 1860./
Fig.1.
Uzice, market day, (F. Kanic) 1860.
2.
1862. .
.
.
,
. (. 1)
.
,
, .
,
( -).
, 13. 09. 1862. .,
, -
.
. 1000
.
205 ,
( .
), , .
-.
,
,
. ,
.
1865. . .
, ,
1
95.000 13.000.
1867. .
, , 24.
1862. ., 2.917
917 , ,
. ,
24 ,
,
.
.
.
50% 50% 6 .
, .1
.2 1862. .
150 .
3.
3.1.
.
. 238
,
( )
.3 ,
.4
69
70
. 2.
, . . 1868.
Fig.2.
Uzice, sketches of eng. M.Ugrii 1868.
. 3.
, , (. ) 1863./
Fig.3.
Uzice, Current state sketch, (E. efel) 1863.
,
.5 (
6)
.
.7
8
. 24. 08. 1863. .
.
, ,
9 :
( )
,
, ,
,
.
,
.
, ,
.
.
,
,
.
:
, ,
,
9. (. 2)
: . , . . .
,
,
.10
3.2. ( 1863. .)
.
, ,
.
.
, .
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
(7 ).
,
.
, ,
. (.3)
. 4.
, (. ) 1863.
Fig. 4.
Uzice, Urban plan, First proposal (E. efel) May 1863.
3.3. ( 1863. .)
:
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
,
.
.
.
,
, 2.490 .
150 /h 2.490
17 h.
1863. .
,
. (. 4)
,
,
.
,
.
.
,
. .
.
.
, ,
.
.
. 5.
, /
Fig. 5.
Uzice, current state and First proposal relation
.
( ).
.
( ). ,
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
, .
.
.
( )
.
1:1 1:3.
, ,
,
.
.
.
1:2 1:3. ,
. (. 5)
71
Fig. 7.
,
/
Fig. 7.
Uzice, current state and Second
proposal relation
Fig. 7.
, /
Fig. 7.
Uzice, current state and Second proposal relation
72
3.4. ( 1863. .)
1863. . . ,
. . .
:
,
. :
, ,
.
:
( )
.
,
. (. 6)
,
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
,
: , , .
: ,
.
:
,
.
.
:
, .
.
: ,
. 1:1, 1:2
1:3. ( ,
), ( )
( ). 25 80 .
1871. . 1891. . (. 7)
4.
1863. .
.
1862. .:
5.700 2.490 .
.
1863. .
.
,
,
.
1863. (.
).
,
,
, ,
, ,
,
.
,
, .
( ) ( ). .
:
,
,
,
, ,
,
je
,
, ,
.
, .
1871. . 1891. .
. (.8])
5. ,
:
: --1865, --1868, --1869.
1: (1985): , ,
2, 3, 4, 5: , . (1981): 1862..,
6, 7, 8:
73
( 19. 03. 2012. )
,
,
?
,
. , . . , 2002. .
, .
, , , ,
, a , .
. , ,
, , .
, . ,
. , , .
, ...
e-mail: ore.alfirevic@gmail.com
75
76
. ,
.
. ,
. ,
,
, ,
. ,
.
, .
,
. ,
,
,
.
P,
.
, .
,
(Richard Meier),
, , (Richard Rogers)
(Norman Foster), .
, ,
,
.
.
?
.
, .
1997. .,
,
.
, ,
.
, .
,
.
.
,
, .
. ,
,
.
, .
,
,
.
.
,
. , .
(,
, , , .)
? ,
?
. ,
.
.
.
?
, .
,
, .
-,
,
,
.
,
, ?
. ,
.
,
.
, ,
, .
, .
,
,
.
3 ,
.
. .
,
.
?
.
,
, .
, ,
. ,
: , ,
.
,
. , .
.
,
. .
? ,
?
.
,
. ,
,
, .
, .
: ,
(), ,
?
,
. .
,
,
,
, .
.
?
,
.
. ,
.
,
.
,
.
.
, .
(, , .)? ,
?
, ,
.
, ,
.
, .
.
?
,
,
.
, .
, . ,
, ?
,
.
, .
,
,
.
, .
,
.
- ,
.
.
?
,
. ,
.
.
.
.
, ,
.
,
. , .
.
, .
, ,
, ,
.
, .
, , ,
.
,
. .
, ,
?
, ?
.
.
,
. , ,
, .
.
,
. ,
.
.
?
77
78
, .
,
, .
?
.
,
?
, .
, .
, .
. ,
, ,
.
:
,
?
,
.
. , ,
- , .
.
,
.
.
, .
? ,
?
, .
, . .
,
,
?
, ,
.
,
.
, ,
.
,
. .
, .
?
,
.
. ,
, ,
, .
. ,
,
,
, ,
.
?
?
,
,
. ,
,
, -, .
, ,
.
( 30.03.2012.
)
?
. ,
kompat house
.
(
, , , ,
3.3 , ,
, , ...
100 2
. , 66=36 2
!!! -
. ,
44 , .
, ,
.
?
. ,
. , ,
.
, , ,
, , , ,
,
, ,
, ,
. ,
. ,
.
(,
, , , .)
? ,
?
, ,
,
,
, .
,
.
?
. , ,
.
.
1956. .
,
,
?
. .
, ,
,
( ).
, ,
.
,
, .
, .
, 40 .
,
, ,
.
je
?
, .
,
. ,
, ,
.
79
80
? ,
?
,
, ,
.
: ,
(), ,
?
, ,
.
?
.
(, , .)? ,
?
.
?
, .
?
, ,
.
, ,
?
, ?
,
. .
.
?
?
. ,
,
, .
,
,
.
:
!*
*(T
, .)
?
, .
.
,
?
!
:
,
?
, ,
,
. ,
,
, ,
.
. ,
. , ,
, ,
.
? ,
?
,
. ,
.
, .
,
,
?
,
,
.
, .
?
, ,
, , ,
,
.
?
?
,
.
,
,
.
,
. ,
60% ,
, .
( 11. 10. 2012.
)
81
?
:
, -
,
(1989),
,
.
(, )
.
, ,
, , ,
.
,
.
, , , ,
. ,
,
,
. ,
,
.
, -
(20012002),
, . .
, ,
,
,
.
.
?
, ,
.
, ,
,
.
( ),
.
.
.
,
, ,
.
,
.
, -
,
, ,
,
.
81
82
,
,
.
,
.
(,
, , , .)
? ,
?
, ,
(Alvar Aalto), (Mies van der Rohe)
, , (Le Corbusier)
.
, (Richard Meier)
. ,
, ,
,
.
.
, .
(1973),
.
,
,
( ,
1983).
, ,
.
, .
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
(1990). ,
,
.
.
( )
. 12.
.
,
.
,
.
?
. ,
, ,
. ,
. ,
.
, ,
, ,
, .
,
. ,
,
.
,
, ?
,
,
. ,
,
. , ,
,
.
?
.
, . ,
.
. ,
,
,
. ,
, , ,
,
.
,
,
.
? ,
?
, , ,
.
,
- .
,
.
.
, , ,
, ,
,
.
: ,
(), ,
?
,
.
, ,
, ,
.
?
,
, ,
.
,
,
, .
, ,
, .
.
,
,
. ,
,
,
, .
(, , .)? ,
?
, ,
,
. ,
,
, .
.
,
, ,
.
,
,
,
2 m
. ,
.
.
.
.
, .
'' ?
,
,
.
?
,
. .
,
, ,
, .
,
, .
? ,
?
, ?
, ,
, ,
.
,
.
.
?
?
,
. ,
.
.
,
, .
,
,
.
, .
, . ,
, .
.
?
83
84
,
.
,
.
. , ,
.
. ,
.
, .
. ,
, .
,
.
,
, .
,
,
,
,
.
,
?
,
. ,
,
.
.
. ,
.
,
, .
,
.
, .
- ,
- ,
.
.
:
,
?
,
, .
, .
, ,
.
, ,
. .
, .
, , .
? ,
?
,
, ,
. ,
.
,
,
?
, , ,
.
.
.
, .
?
.
?
?
,
, .
, ,
. ,
,
.
, ,
. ,
,
, ,
. , .
,
.
35, . 62 :
:
, ,
? , ?
:
,
,
.''
85
13.
:
1 : 100
:
: ,
, , , ,
, , ,
:
, , , ,
13.
(Common Ground),
(David Chipperfield)).
,
, ,
.
: , , - ,
:
.
, ,
, ,
. ,
,
.
- ,
-
.
87
1 : 100,
. ?
, , .
, , ,
, ,
: , .
88
" , ,
, . ?
, , , ?
, .
.
, ,
.
j COMMON GROUND
13. "1.
225 m
20 cm
. ,
: ,
, , .
. ,
:
: , , 2012.
,
, , .
? ,
, 1962. 2012. ,
: , ,
.
.
. , ,
, .
, ,
, ,
, ,
, .
(, , )
, ,
, , .
, , ,
.
, , , .
.
( 1939) ,
, .
,
( ),
( 2000. ), , .
, , ; ,
, - , , ,
.
, , , , ,
.
, ,
,
.
89
90
,
(
, )
. ,
, , (
), , ( ,
. ), (
).
,
. .
.
.
.
. , ,
:
- (
) .
-
1976. ,
. 1981.
,
.
,
1982. .
,
(. ).
,
, , ,
, , , .
, , ...
-
. ,
. ,
-
.
.
.
-, ,
(1985).
.
. . , ,
.
1985. 1989. .
.
. .
1985.
.
,
,
, ,
, .
.
67
, ,
,
.
,
.
,
,
,
( ),
, ,
, ,
. , ,
:
, .
2012.
,
.
:
, ,
.
,
.
.
.
,
. ,
.
:
.
, (...)
, , .
.
.
(. ,
, 18.05.2012)
,
.
, .
. . , , ,
. ,
,
.
(2004-2008),
.
,
.
/ ,
.
.
.
91
Das Unheimliche /
:
: , , 2011
92
( ,
, , 2008)
/ Das Unheimliche, , Das
Unheimliche / ,
:
(, ,
, , , ).
,
. 1996.
.
.
.
.
: Das Unheimliche
2009. . .
Das Unheimliche /
, ,
, .
,
.
: , , , , .
,
: Das Unheimliche
Das Unheimliche.
Das
Unheimliche.
, ,
,
Das Unheimliche
: , , , .
/
Das Unheimliche.
Das Unheimliche /
2011. .
, 2012. .,
, ., ,
, .
Das Unheimliche
( )
, , ,
,
.
.
93
IN MEMORIAM
:
. 8. 2013.
.
94
, ,
1950- ,
,
, ,
,
.
,
,
,
,
, , ,
,
,
,
.
,
, .
,
, ,
. , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
-
, , ,
, ,
,
, ,
-
.
60- ,
,
,
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
. ,
, ,
,
,
, ,
,
.
,
, , ,
,
-
,
.
,
. ,
,
. ,
, ,
. , ,
, .
,
, , .
, ,
. ,
.
,
, ,
.
, ,
,
.
, .
, ,
. ,
, , .
, .
.
,
.
, , ,
. , ,
.
.
, , .
, , . ,
, , ,
,
.
, ,
,
,
,
.
,
,
, ,
, .
, , ,
, , ,
,
.
:
,
, .
, ,
, ,
.
, ,
. ,
, ,
, .
, .
, .
.
, ,
,
, ,
.
.
, , ,
,
.
,
, , .
,
,
, ,
, ,
.
.
.
,
.
. , , .
, ,
,
,
.
.
2013. .
95
96
.
16
2,5 cm ( 28 800 - Characters
with spces),
.
ASEESTANT.
ASEESTANT
www.iaus.ac.rs/code/navigate.
aspx?Id=111 ASEESTANT
http://aseestant.ceon.
rs/index.php/a-u/
.
, ,
, . .
,
( )
.
,
- www.iaus.ac.rs
e-mail.
:
:
:
,
.
.
ASEESTANT
/
/ () () ( / ).
.
, , , -mail
. ,
*, ** ***.
:
200 .
.
. .
:
.
.
.
, ,
.
. , .
, , .
.
(.: , , , ...), Insert
Symbol (Word).
,
, ( ) .
,
.
, , ,
, .
:
. 1, e-mail
.
:
, ,
.
. :
(. 1) (. 1). .
Fig.
ASEESTANT 4:
.
:
, ,
, , .
:
:
;
; ( ); ,
( italic), (bold), (
). ( : ),
( ).
:
: Radosavljevi, R. (1995): Osnovi zatite graditeljskog
naslea jezgra Novog Sada, Arhitektura i urbanizam 2, str. 2332;
: Brki, A. (1992): Znakovi u kamenu, Beograd, Savez
arhitekata Srbije, 242243;
, : (Brki, 1992:243).
,
.
, .
:
, ,
. , ,
.
,
.
:
,
.
:
: Microsoft Word (*.doc *.docx);
Microsoft Word (*.doc *.docx);
, .: Adobe Illustrator; InDesign;
, .: TIFF ( 300 pixels/inch,
CMYK) ;
,
;
,
.;
(
);
;
;
.
CIP
, 71/72
: ,
/ .
. 1, . 1
(1. 1994) - . ( 73/II) :
, 1994 ( :
). 30cm