Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The current session of Parliament ended last week on very much the same
note as it began last fall – with partisanship carried to excess and threatening
to precipitate an unwanted and unnecessary election.
But as the writer of Ecclesiastes observed long ago, there is a time for
everything. And perhaps this summer could be a time for our federal
politicians, their key advisers and the Ottawa media gallery to take stock of
the perceived dysfunctionality of Parliament and come up with a “fresh start
plan” for this fall. By that, I mean a plan that would restore public confidence
in Parliament at a time when such confidence is sorely needed, especially to
facilitate economic recovery.
So why don't the Speaker and the House leaders get together this summer
and come up with a plan to reform Question Period to make it a credit, rather
than a discredit, to the democratic process?
At the same time, why don't the owners of our major media and the
executive of the Parliamentary Press Gallery get together to discuss
reforming the role of the media in reporting on parliamentary affairs. Media
coverage tends to amplify the negative and controversial dimensions of
parliamentary activity and to dampen or ignore the more constructive
aspects.
Since Jan. 26, when the second session of the 40th Parliament convened, 52
government bills have been introduced; of those, 26 have already been
passed and have received royal assent. This legislation has included budget
implementation measures, the appropriation of funds to finance the stimulus
package, free-trade agreements with a number of European and Latin
American countries, Arctic pollution protection and the enlargement of
Nahanni National Park, energy efficiency and the facilitating of electronic
communications, and Criminal Code amendments pertaining to organized
crime, auto theft and trafficking in stolen property.
As part of a “fresh start” for Parliament this fall, there must be some way of
reforming media coverage of its activities. But given Canada's commitment
to respect freedom of the press, such reforms must come from the media
community itself.
Those limits derive from the fact that voters are never as partisan as the
partisans. They will never love us and our party as much as we do, and they
will never dislike our opponents and their party as much as we may. When
we step outside those boundaries - deifying our own cause and demonizing
that of our opponents – we will lose public support. When we stay within
those boundaries - clearly distinguishing ourselves from our opponents but in
believable terms - we stand a better chance of restoring public confidence in
ourselves, in our parties, in Parliament, and in democracy itself.