You are on page 1of 159




  


 

%% ........................ 
 
#   !" : 
)* .................................& ' "   
),......................................................... + 


 
  

01............................"& ' " -


 - 
. 
0,........................................! & '
&
41.......................................! & ' 23





40...................................! & ' 5


-'

   

  

!
 


 
  


 
  "#

  


 


% & 
 

  
 

40.............8 & ' 59 6  ! 7#


+,.......
"" 
)"  *#( &  
 :&' 
*1.................Trivial Constructivism

 !

*)................radical Constructivism


& !

*0..................social Constructivism

&' !

*4................cultural Constructivism

-9: !

*;.................critical Constructivism

 9 !

*;............interactive Constructivism

< !

**.................human Constructivism "=-" % !


>)....................................... ! 9 - 5
>A.............................@
+8 
< ?  6 !

 

  -  

,/...................................&.   &. 


 
 :-' 
),*................................................! "
 

C)..............................................! @ " "B<

),A................................................&   !

C0......................................................!  "D&"

)C1.................(D
 ..N
  ..D3) ! .  "

C*............................."D&"  -
 ?' !
E

A;.................................-
 "  "D&"
E &

A>..................................!  -
 " 5
-

)1>..................-
 " - 
. 
 ! 23 &F

%/6....................
 .  4 5 
"
 
)
" : " 
)A*..................................  
 " &
F

01)......................................""  !  H

0)*.........................................."=-"  % H

0)A....................................."
"  B<
G H

))).................................................." "E 7


00)...................................""
.  ! " H

))0.............................. "E H " +  6


G

00;.............................................. " &


F

))>............................." "E & - I


E B&

)),......................" "E J B  "  " 


.

))C......................................." "E  


.

)40......................................." "E -


 
.

);C.....................................!
.  " "E

76/................................................ &


 :0" 

%1/....................
 
.  
 " 


 :0 

0;;...................................................... "9 6
-

0;,.................................................99 "9 7 

0;C.................................................99 "9 23

0*)............................................K 8 "9 3& 23

0**........................
+'  K 8 "9 3&  -3+'

)*C....................................................! " !

0C*..............................................K 8 "9 & "E

)>).......................................I   K  ! "

0>)..................................... ?  K  "9 3& " +

)>,.............................! "  E 


 


0>;..............................................K 8 "9 3& "9

),1...........................................! " ! L!E+

),0.................... 9 
I
& 9 - ! 
I
&

%33...........................&  
 &.   : 2 

79/................."
 

 
!" 
   !" :' 



0,)...................P-
 ? - Q  & R
- !  # 

0,;...............P-
 ? - # E 
. !
 

. -     
 @ B D V N
<G D N  W 

0,*..................PS

.  R R
- ! : 

0C1........................................! H 3

K9 F X!
< 
  F J F 
 -     < T ... 
3Y' ":  X
<  
 
 - Z 
 -  J I
.
Y-
Y
<  @ E J 7
  X 
     J F B
"Y UY#  B '
R T D&    
 ."  " 
.Y&' 6<  -
 K 
 . - N
  ! 
.  J
Y9 Y IK  "  7
   J F R5  # #
Y  YB!   J F  
<  S -
 9    B- 

Y8 Y& ! D: - " J F R5 Z  @
& 
 "

0C0......................?3   T  -


  
0C4...................................." "B - -
 9
0C>................................................."9 
0CA................." - ! H &' 9 
0CA........................." - ! H  9
0A*...................................?  I
 E
41,...............................................U&
 !#

.D R!#     7# R !# 2E


B-  [
9  J F  
N
  7 T   ... B
 6 - " D 

E
< !
< 23 
F  &


 - =  X 
  

9 "E   9
IK< U-
J F   =  

& + "  = K  


:V   ..<+   7. 3+  
 

 &  :  7.   
 "E D& D-
<
B  8 @  \ U X   "  I  !  9!< !
#  " 9  
 
 <G ' U  B- ?
< 
J ' E  DV "  B!:  +

KY9 F ": X! DB< -


 " 
 D  " 9- Z : E< 

S "BY 9!< K  E+ !< B& 




9 <E J

=Y  Y .Y-
 " - B #  8 "<  "D&" J K5

I Y & Y-^ 2Y- - !


<  5  ."
]  " E

 23 
F G =  -
 "  ! "D&"
E & 6


I
YE Y SY  
 99 "9  3+  "9 

"Y Y5
-' R
Y< R5
 "  ."   I
E -
E

.N  99  


 ! 23 &  &F 6
 Z  "+  X! @ -

"YE Y Z  7
 & U
E< - .-
 " - 
.

Y YB  KY& YE- Y: ?Y Y  9- "     

'
R YF X "E H " +  6
G 25 N3 DB< "

Y "Y: XB & -


 "B< 25 3+  =  X! & '

"Y Y
. JY F
 9 ": X" "E & - I
E B&

& Y GYE


<  _E  23  ! & '
&

.! 
. ": -
 
.  RK  " "E J B 

6
Y B X! & ' 5
-' J F =   Z  @
& D&
`Y:3: B V -
  X99  & ' 59 6  ! 7#

Y Y !Y " !   - "  "  + E< -

X!
  I
+  B<# =  Xa B5-
 X&8  
 

@ Y I Y K V B


 ! " ! 6
 " Z XZ 

.b J "!9 " .. R


+

R
+ .
: ! 
&  
9 ! N L!E+ 6
 " ":X"

5
 ?   !
< 
  ?9 7 : E< K& 

D3 R5 =  !


<  J " E<  K 6
 "

! U
 6
 N3 X&' ": 
& -  !  Z   - .B

.D
 =  N
 

!
< 
  Z  "+  X< =   9 !  -9:

9  X

<  23 
%   - :=- % ! 

 R  5
 9- "
 &
 " !     E< -

@  
% =  5 ? B 5 & ' ?  !

B    " - ! H  #3   


 &
'

-
 59 E - & ' ?   
]  ! 73+

H X" I
    
 " &
d   E- +

6 !  


9 E<  - Z  "+  -
 " H

=- " % ! H X! ""

X?
9 @  J 7
 =  -
    @
+8 
< ? 
.B  

""
.  ! " H "
 " B<
G H =  "
. " &
F R
+
K  "9 3&  <E 99 "9 J F 
 D& U E< -
"9 7  XN
E "9 6
< "R5
" ?  E+ <E ? 
N 23 
F ":  K 8 "9 3& 3+  "9 7  ": 99
B ?3 D&  "9 < \  =  B 3+  "9  3&

 

 
# ..  !"

)":   
 

     B% Z  "+ ": XB +


 BE <
.< N K F " B
K  !  'T 
       : E< - ... R
+
# E 
. 
  X-
 ?   &
-  D #  E  R
+ S

.  
-  D:    X-
 ? .-
 " - ! H  D&   3 
  
R  & J R < R! 75  G  [
9  F ?  " 9 F F
D W  &
 X < " 
  <<   - D <  & 
U DF U< ' "  eD W  X  U< D-   eJ 
.K ?&
R = V F "B " " D W JE D 
D V 
 9  W V
." D W JE W 
 E "3
R 9 3
R  R R#
 R-


 
# ..  !"

)":   
 
2
"  DT
- R!
'
R  5  9 3+ S
 Z B
" -
:T  &
+   J 
    =  @- X" 
X" ! (b F...N XD XDE+) " 
G : : X"
+   J 
 J F X    = 
] X" &
+ XB 
X9 D-
 : : X" 9 + S
&  E+ X" -
:T 
D ? XN
< X " D- X D&   X9 D
J  J F "  ? " "  9' " D S .-
 D
."" 99 D& X"J S " "?
B 3F constructivism "! " 
.  
B.  =  ?  #
 Congnitivism -
 
.  behaviorism  
. 
 -  constructivism !  7
  J  Z F : 9 
 + # 
  <  << "&  " Z ...E  F D 
- T
":B <  B-
 S 
   "& K: X! I  I
F
`D
<  K - R  <  B # X <  X" 
.
d- <-
" I
+ U 
< D
# < &

7
  Z 
. 7
E -  # 
-  >(?  .

( 0)

&  Empiricism

( ))


&    K9  3
R < : !

 -
 X!
]
     PP      X! 

.Nativism

   - : ! "    I+  XB    G B' 

 9-
 # 
 X! "   9 'F 25 ' #  : R<
 F

B  6  7 9- D .B


-   !  XD-  S

F P#  J ! 7


    - D&  J d- ...B 
.

.Z   8 K& - D   =  XJ 8

! S X! S
. ?E D& 59 T  J &%
?E #   X? & "B    J =  X"B< Constructivists

E ! 
. " 9 " F X?
G'      @
+ I

- 
E & "B  XB Z  - B 9- XB R  R<
 " =- D    
< J F H F
8- . - R XI& 
.D
<
R<
 ! S
.  "  
<   - B
 :3: ' : F

  <  <<  8 - R I  &  "! " .< F :;<`B
 # I    H # % " E  
G B- D
...D
9  
 XB  J J
9
= - ":  X
- I  "B  X   
<  ! S
. F :=
'
.B  7
 J "B - \&F

:^ 
- "?9 < - & " -
 '  E# # ! S
. F :''
.D - B R  J   
8 
 
YYYYYYYYY
 
+ -
 ? <- ? :(
& ? ) :
& ())
 3+ f B  X #  9 - I &
-'  @
 <- ? : & (0)
.5

K'T  "0*11  E   I


-
 -
   

 : : <+ ?  S  & '  <3< 'F h8
J J 9< " F ("
] ... 


 X X
  X3-
 D
] .K 6 R
G R
E " # # "B - X-
  
   X-
 L+  
 J  R 9< # "B R9 g 
: - :   " Z  3
E  X-

E D
..  *" B "
C( D2E # epistemic subject .  (

theory of knowledge .  &. 


 

epistemology

(6)

"
)":" <

knowledge -
 "B<   J K5 K9 F   
< ? #

. @ F 
 ! 23  7  # =  .-
 
.
.V - D    .-


.  *" B " C(  # epistemic object .  
7 X   : X&  X I
.  XR:   XR!  # D
.I
8 ". X 
epistemic relation -
 \5 X-
    (#3 )  E
#3 X
E N 99  "B
E   @
+ I
 <+ "B 
.
+j B5
  X-
 J  
 <-  "  7  25
X-
 
. Z 7
  =  XR: B <3<
- 9- =   X
E
.(*)& '  - J  

> .  .  


 Z   
E - F .  J J 
9 ' -
 "B< F
B & ' I
F  Z D # <<  8 - -


( ;)

S
 J

7
 +  Z D DF # F !  ' # Xg9   D  ". 7B -  h
B 9  ?
 3 XI
: (IX7X
X\X") 
B  i
E .h  E8 @ E  & 7B  +  . R
 0*11
# X+ 7
 N J "B& 
: # "B S ..B & ..B &
.2E  J B

.<  F + 7
 
 7  D  N E# S @G F
<< 8 = XZ
 =  : F ". 7B   X-


YYYYY
- F (
)
" )
 - (
)5 ) ) - &# F;;. &. C
 G): *" B H 
"
 - 'I' "   :(3)
. ( 
)" ) .  


YYYYY
J
 # D K "  
. J Logos  -
 J Episteme  9
] 5<  & ' 2E  :(4)
.D  -
 & '  -
 
. E
  73+ =  J D ?& D
] -
 "  -
 
.
. 2E D   & - 
<  <3 3  S S
 J  E9 :(;)

R5
 R<# <9- e"B#
- \ J eskepticism

( ,)

= ? ?E 

:(
)"  <) .  
 - < )

 9 ' X 9 


 "Bd- ":  X9 ? ?E 

X-
  
 (& ' ) -
 
. Z & F R< #

.-
 R9
< & "BF F `-
 5
.   < :=
'
9 B- -
 ?' E 
  L+ 5#  K&  6

B&  - < &  PR :' " X  " X-
 ?' E 
 9
. B& 6
  < .<3<  & 
+^ \
?E Xintellectualism 9 ? ?E
. B& : X59 N

F P-
  Z  6
   S  : '
R T h
 
X   XB# F Z  -
   -
 
. Z
 .-
 \5 99 R
+ XB J F E 
 ": XBE
-  h  5# Z3: =    
 <  &% 6

59  7 X-
 
. Z KE9  X
  XB
: -
E+ Z3:

B&  : :
. B&   6
 ": sensationalism  ?

; F# F.  ? := <

E  9  J F 9 ?- criticism S 9 ? ?E


.

J #   X9  =  -


   8 59 N


# F  =  - "B& X 


&  X %  X-
 8
X
& H ' d-  Z :  F X& ' 59 F 3
R :
9 %
E  F 9 - . 9  E :%  
 
  - '  decorates "
 "
B "B-- S
J

 J#
 '    X. -
 J F S T Bd- ":  XB 
'
:
.9
- X 
& J F U&
 F -
   
-  ? ?E 
 -
 d- ":  X  B9  -
 9-  9YYYYY

J F :   V L+ 59 N d-   J .truth 99 
K  99 U (-
 \5) \5  -
  @  S
7+  P5 D99 U  K  -
  :3
R :- P9
& 

( >)

9 ? ?E &- X V N  << 


8

  " X9  K  -


   
 "B J dogmatism
D K  -
- B# E
+ J F    =   X3% J # E
: E X! X] ' Z3: - & D X!
' B  ' I 
.(9 D99) 5 K 99

#
) : 
]' <3< & " :   J  skeptikos  skepticism = ? :(,)
 " X K'    f 9 IK<  < -   =!  (b F ...
]
 -  
# 
. ' ' 
   &  '  # V+
E   X" - !+   S J "B

YYYYY

& ?  X9 ? : D+ <- ?  :3:  9 ? "5 :(>)
.S 9 ? X( )

?  ?E  " < B9 '  #  ?  & I


E

U&
 F B
5 73+ J -
  X
&   9 I

5 

"]
 D  9 #  ? ?E @
 F critical realism  9 # 

john locke "= &" "B-- @


 .( C)
  -8 D  J F

J L< U5+ !9 N d- X&


+ K8 !9 =
   

D +    ?


&  Tabula Rasa K5 <E  9 

<  'F H
+ - R99 R & I   U- . "  # K5

.(-

)


 9
 -
<E8  
d- .    F  B
 

? D  - :-   X9  


. B& 

  &- "!3 K5  


: E+  9
 -   XR3:

&   X 9  Kant "" :  N


E T F S 9

"]
J  .
   &   F I
<E J 3- X
<E8  

5  9  :    R =  25  .-


 
E 


&  X  J  9


 - E+ 
 I
<E &  

.: : 59 #

=
F   9 #   -
  S XB 
F J 7# ' 5

.   


5 := ''

- Z S 9 <   I
E =
F  X&
+ Kk 9 I
E

X-
    DE Z  -
 \5 E  V 59 N 

.-
 NB  
   X&
+ 5 % -
 F

 E+ 59 = N& << ?  


+^ \  '
R & & 

:-
  "B
. - !- Z3: J F 9 "Bd-  : 

'
R     Idealism  : ? ?E realism #  ? ?E

" =
 9  @
   X3-  5  : :B

&
+ Kk  #  @
 .#  ? ?E
. B& 6


.D-
:T S  \5 F  XD-
:T ' =
% \5

9 I
E -
  .B
     3
R 9 R & (-
 \5)

&- =
% J F U&
 &  @
   X"
"     : :
'

'F   9 - =
   &
+ "  - .&
+ "  - K8 !9

.=

G & 3- XB
  N K8

 N .U#  - & "  I


E

YYYYY
   S T Z J
 
#'   "&  &%  %  \ condtional reflex 
  < (C)
 X   - B
& K
&  =  &% <  & D Z  F J F X E8 D   & D 3 J
.
& \  ? ? 
< F -
 "7- " 
& -  

:
  
)"  ()

 J 9  8
 .   B- :""   9  : :''

   ' (-
 
.) & ' -  & Z S V   R#3

 7  -
 N 9 K F 9 <. .
&  ? 
 .  X
&

R  B-  N  ! : ' # d- X


<E 9   Xf
I 9 <  B  X& ' & - IV&-  R
 B9  'F I  &  F < B  X& '  ^  E
< B J ! D B "
 !
#  2  ... j J 
]
 'F X( #   j B 9 & ) - V U9   I  &
  X  & ? #  GE - B! XB9   X& # 9 < T
P! < B   U9 
:   J =  XU9 N      U F
Giambattisa

( A)

"- &"  % 7< D- S U9 =  := <

   X-
 K  treatise D
 - R
9 "),)1 "  vico
D  'F 7
 ' % 9  X-
  % 9  I
-  B.D<
 D- 
 "
 " "- " :  "= " 
- D- U9 :=
'
.K8  K F 9 f 9 IK< X  < - "B

. 
& &  
< D<5  XH
+  K& 

:j J      - I &  8 _E   N
 5 5  XE +   F  
& - XH
+  I


& S U '   RGE  X[  
& 9 " 9 F .  U&
9 " 9  
&  .
& E  
 B- =  U XB 9 
.()A,AX
 ) ' 
 " #d 2- XI  & 
<+ = 
 -
 
. X-
 "B<    I  #  
- 
. B<E ! (& ' ) -
 23 "B< &  -

    X& ' ?   !  =  E3+ ...-

&  Xj J ! J 8 23 : E3+ = .5# X-

.
 <  Z3: -
 5# - ! 
  K "
 [
9
I
 D &%- X T   &% ? & ' [
9 V 
]
' Xj 6
   B  @
 ! @
+ 23 : F Z X
 .& ' 
& 
 23 

YYYYY
! S
. 6 N
.),;; )>>C  I
< -  d   - g % ? \  7- : -& (A)
."
&  :  !   DV : 

9   D- 
 kant "" :  ? ?E D- U9 := ''
J   '9 
E N  'F D'9 XN
E R9- -
 l
.D  K "  J  ' 
& " 
P. "S

" "B Darwinism "
" ? ?E D- U9 := 
 "!    $% & ' () + -.( ) 

F Moreau
!  I
-  5 F Charles Darwin "


"  E. Hilaire
.7 R : !  X ! 
" " :  pragmatism

( )1)

&
 ? ?E D- U9 := "2

"@ &" George Simmel "  H


&" XWilliam james " &

+8 fE Z Alexander bogdarnov "7 &


 " john deweys
- <.  ^ -
   B
 instrumentalism " 8 " !
 I
.I ?   +
!9
' & ' 
. ?E D- U9 := ""
& ! " # S  Xjean piaget "D& &" Genetic epistemology
. E<  R9' N

  -
 ? <  B9

YYYYY

. i
T 9     &   <<  X  S pragma  .< 

Pragmatisim : &
 ()1)

 #  
E   \5 
E  " D 9 & BE+ . )CAC "  !  << "< " & " " D
5
."
: '  !  \5  

B F instrumental  ! @ -


 - .-
 3 
.3      I
 "B  

"# 
]  
 X()) "#
  
 
.   U9 = 
 X"! " < 7 V 
E ! S
. ".

( )))"

-
3& -"

B J XB3 B 


  -
    9 & ' -
 F.;

<  U9  :    .B ?  5- S XB- 


  R5

F  G ' # d- ":  .(I


+  #3   S) contextual (#)
#

.  
# :3:
 B E X!
&  3.  9  #


      F  K  B-


 - E+ D ' DV #

9 & B3 :   X! & '


& 6
 

.N -
 E R& D

- & ' B  :   X! @


+8 23 6  : 

D< h
 T :- .! & ' 23 6
  B  

.U- 


&  
. 9-   J >5. .  &. 
 
 # .j


  
)"  JI

!P #  N5
 S  J <<
.  -
 \5 B &

:! & ' 23 


 #   +  &  -

 -
 ? - 
. R5 !   7 
   :  : 9

  J reality U#   @


 &  T
 I
 !

.)

D   -
 \5   D S X("
.) & 
.


& R   -
   S
8 epistemic subject -
  

.R  &   <<

 U#  K   B  XU#  K   B  XU#   + 


E

# D Z X
 !
. " -
3& -" 
 - N & 


.-
    3+

F .-
 \5 D   R    
8 N 
: - U&

6 F J .-


 K R
& R
  (-
   )  F

.0

 Z X theory of knowledge -


  - 
. 
' \

-
  9 F XR   R! -
  X"  
 # ! S
.

  N .9- &   <-    -


 J 
 I
+8

knowledge -
 9   ! 
. 6-
 ":  X"  

X
 ! S
E 
:  R5  & 
" -
3& -" B +

.B'  transmission

N  ":  .Autonio "" gurney"


&" wheatly"" :

I
 U#  9 B -  ! @ -
 J "
 F .4

- 
. B  '
+8 
.  ! "   Z   

X
<

 J  D J X B -   D

X-
 ?

YYYYY

 - g X
     - \

 X 8  -  Ernst Von Glaserfeld -
3& - 
 ()))
 G  : \
 R
  2E )A>0 " - .<E B    J )A;> "  :   ?
 K: \

.)AC, " 9 J &
& & - -
 < " 
 "# )A,1 " - . 
8 I  '  
 "  

.g & -  ' ' Z B - R 
 R :   


 I  & I
+ J  X B   @  D-
 - X" B -

Theory of cognitive learning -


 " - 
. B   &

#3   -
    .
  I  & I
+
   - D-


" - 
. B    ! "   7   7- D

  XD  "   U  - D XD


 X" I
+

.Z   : K& - -




X Contextual #  X


#   ! !   -
 -
.

:! & ' 5


-3  - 6


. B D9: I
+ 7#  ' X B knower 7
  E< ' B J

:
  
)"  . 

<
+'
-  9 ' -
   
] X
-'  "<  .H

  constructive epistemology ! & '


E 

Wheatly "" =  
 XB
G J D< J B 9 - .

. assumptions 5


-  5# X-



+' U D
& S E'  " D 9 
E ! S
.
 

(B5
]  ) -
 <. L+ :B: X-
 ? L+:B 

E9) 
  X  9 - & J < "B 
- 9 J S T '

.BE

S
.  ":  ." 
+' =!  
-  @ <+ 
: (
-

:  K. 

XI 
 knowledge transmission -
 9   
 !

X D
+ J  -
 cognizing subject U   
< J

B  : D 9n " -


3& -"
 "
. =  "&
 XB'
E

 : S 6
-'  
+'   I
E B9 '

I
< I
+
< cognitive organizer -
 ! - X-
 S X D<

? 59 E 5 6 D 3+  7 ! & '

." structured word .    

:;#  & F&"  #  . 


+'
-  BG " '
-'  @
  .5 J  "" T

 ' 7< D ?  <  XD-


 
<  .

 J =  . ( 9


< S) D F B 
F X - B ! 


N

  -
 J ' 9  J
   "-&"

(J9 S) D  X


+
- #  D 
 S 

  L+ 9

.! & '


&  Z  

.D
 D-  9 X
 2- @

IB '   I
+  J `D
+ 
< -
  .?
D
+  - B D
+  3: "
 "  < -
- -


  D-
 - D!. D D     # D   79
B + 
 U D
+    .I
+ N K5 J 9-

(<) <.  V - ! S


.
. B&  25   J K

7. U 7  cognition -


  <. F :&' K. 

-
  fitness !   Z  -
 K  
 F X-


(  ) 
& "  ".  + Xadaptive (  ) 
& " 

U#  "!  B 6
< -
 - Xmatching 9    reality U#  

ontological (& % )  & 99 7   experimental world

 S
8 .2< I    D-    <9 - <9 h< "!  

X-
 <.  ! 7#  6
-'   7 .9 reality

:D + ". 3+  U#  U  B 3


R  

.-
 <.  "B<#      XR< B F 
  -
 E 5#
B -  Kk  & 99 9 B - -
  U ' F

S D< J  instrumentalist  B J -



. ! -

 D
  -
< -
<     =  J  Xviable <

J F S T   I &  -
 - XR < =  5  "&
 " D F ?

J
<    <  -
 d- ! S
. G . 
+

7#  J F 9 j  .  D  U D  R-



<



 .I
+ J 
 cognitive constraints-
 G5 U 7

.-
 E 5#  !

- ! 
: 23   :D 9 " -
3& -"
 J 

 & 99 7 - %  -  D ! T 

99 9 B J =    ?& ' X# E  -


   V

= ' F" :D 9 ""  ! S


.  =  
 9  XKk


+ G5 U BT  J <   < F X &

] .(D -)  DT


 X#  "  =
F J    

-
 - ?]
! F     XExperiental constraints

radical  


! "B    X"B  Ek   -


 9 25 3
R :  ?
5  "
<  X < J cognizing organism

 "   9 - R. XR


  (-
 .S) B  constructivists

D99 e 9  "B    e 9 ' K  < .-


 X9

.D 
+ &

J N  B J X<  7


 "  "B  .9 & %

X"B hypothetical realism 5


-' #  ? ?E8   B]

 7#  : D -
 R G5   I
+ 7#  6
<

=   .U#    


 hypothesis6
- 'F   -
 

I
F  X  LG  XK  6 - ?+  # < B- .3

99  X-
  E   
 "B  73+ J !   25

.B R 7+ D  "]


 D-

." & "  


! ?#  = 

 .9 5

5
-'  & d-    X
  I
 99  @
 :&' G) 

 E< 5 99  X99  X99 "  & ' D N <


.6 B5 B#3 - E  (-


 S)

 X 9 3+  J personal world    - X9 % 

 
 & - ! @ & @  L+ - 8 \5


 9 99 = ' D J) N


]  # 
:V  "   d- ":

U "&  X+ 
 99 
. BF Z  -
 \5

  F Z XR& B I


< 5 99 & 3- ":  `(N
]

 "9 `R+ 


 ". B J 99 J F
. ! 5< .U# 

. K 99 N& E+ T

- 
 XE+ I
+ "  U & E+ 5
]8 R+ D!

7#     99   ! 7#  F 9 

.
 -
 I # K

& ' 23 "8 6


 # .(& ) 9 ? ?E

knowledge .  :=


'

& ' 59 6  ! 7# J 7


 
& !

.B !  < X-


 \  J F 6
 

.8

inert knowledge : . 

:
)"  
 K   
 LM

I
 I
E T  " F 'F
B. '   X 9 - I
9 -
 

8  Xknowledge -
  Xtruth 99  (staver,1998) "
<" @


Xpassive vocabulary  


< :B:  X
 T 
 

 Z  instrumentalism !


  experience I
+  Xsolipisism

I
E  I - B + ' D  X
< B-
   B E9

.
 ?  X<3<
- 
 B 5 brain research


3+  "B<  XU&  R
-  "  R G- ..

 XU5  =  \5   ! U# h5F  7

 #  Z 8  X
-8 N  
 "B  `&' "  Xb


5 D F  S  ! "B<


 X!
\5  99


  "<  =  ."
 +  XI - B 5


: - D5   X@


+8

 " :  ."B  "   XB 


 ' "B  "

"5  )" " truth 


 := <

X#  9  B


 ' "B  X5
3  <+ ? 

-
  @
 : 8 N&' : 99 J F
. - !
& =

=
  !    N - ." - "B


& d- XG   -


 
 8 X#  !9 U   '
.(Searle,1995) !9 U 9 F E X# E  B + 

 " 7
 6
G   .I
: 
9
8 9
 9 : :

 :  J- X#  "B  


 3   - 

.<+ 
 D F
.    7#

 "B ' XU- 


: : " I  - 8 'j 
  "#

N #   


    K
. 
: =  U5 ! -

"!9 " 


+^ +  = .'j N : "B  :  :

- K
j N U& 
9 ? " +  X   \5  <+ K
j

N  \
 "B# K: "B<  ? D- .3 J

B&  K8 T


`<+
 8 L9 ! U& .I   #3

.  : : X   \5  !E9   U&  "# : : X"<

.<+

Ritual knowledge :

 . 
: : .B R5  J =
   
I
E B +  -
 

solipisism  K. := ''

-
 b
  K8  =  X K  V  
   D 9 S

lacey )
< 9  H
+ K & ' DV !9
. B& 8 F

& !   ."  5


- 
 9 =  X

"B5-
=  `N&'   !  6 @
 .(1996,segal 1986

  - 7
 N U5 " "9  - J   -
 N

: 9 9 . & Z "B#


 "  XU#  U R& 
 99

.-
 D "9 S   -  g#   X3

&    9 XU#  U "&  99   9 ' !   

foreign knowledge :
) . 

   X(8 ? ?E 9 ?) 3+ 'F   9  H


+

- Z   : : XL+ 
. U 6

.  V  -
 

?E  - D< U5 


  8 ? "-" 6-
F .2E
]

  X  -

.  +
 Z k 
. Z b


d- X + UE   9  H


+ K   F" : 9- ? 

: : XJ B   <+ Z 8 N   =  .9 -



. 

< J F 
. R 5 " X   " 'F "    L+8

#
 &  -3+' X
 J 
 9 K9 F 

        B- ."B+   +


&  J I
.

X 
 9 - <+ & 

U5  N foster "


-"  J ."!!!!!"  - I  99 
 " F 6-
 B J  A J  S 6
-' " F : 9 
N J ."R :' J

Z  J   d- E8 !


. B&  .J  %

  D   X8 ? 6-


"  NB R9-." 

"B  XB R9 I


+  R&
+ R  ! 6
< 3- .% +

X &
+^ L+ = I  99  L+
<  V 7
'

 L+ I
+  "

- -" @
 .I
+ U D J "  J F 
.

. B& - I
: ? & = .E+ # H
+ & "  = 

!   # .
< I
+  L+ &
+ "    XR&
+ R

:B #  "


-"

 J % I


# - :   learning paradox " 5 "9

"
-"  
G # XU#  B J I
+ S 9 -
 " I
. e

D 
  XE 3+ J I   ?
  I 9 ?


  &
+ "    X&
+ U  L+ I
+  @
 Z

R&  R-


 J %  ! @
 =  .(Grossberg, 1982)

.D
+  L+ 'F

X&
+ "  & !
 '  .
< I
+ "  U ' 9

.#   ! 73+ 25 8 ? ""." 6


 ' e

R  -

+  U ' 8 X &  B #3 ' -
 B
.  

.
F  9 X E< &
+ "  & R9 6
< ' ! -

  + E @ J I


+ 
' - +8 ?& .I
+ 

& "    X & " 


 ' ! d- 5 

=  &  X
- I
E  B "9 J     XJ

."   & 
F  '

.  -
 ! <E

Experience :N2 := 

Instrumentalism 
( := "2

J F
. !   X-
 " - B  X & "<  I
+


X 
. J F
. << - " 9  7
   !
   F

I  BB&  B Z `I


+  "B  B 3- X+ 
 B J 99

.
 .  T  X
G  X.3  ^ B J  9  X[  

 8 9- L+ B J I


+ 7
  .&
+ "  U

I
 99    J "9  ! 
. - R R& !




+  .B  -
  I
+    '   X-
  X=
a

+ ". B J 99 J F E8 !


. Z X+ 
 

! <E .-


 NB R

 I

5   B  X-
 E 

5-
 K 6  25   .". <.   D
 


   X %  "    


d- & 

I T !
 "B< J !  R5 25   D  X!

. B&
9-   X9 B5
]8 7
  & X 
-V
 
@
 B- "D&"  X" -
3&" 9  

:CE   &  


 MI 

 7+ -
 & - 7  7 D  X<  -
 

 7
   S
 b 
E Z J ! 
 "9

D  -
      -
 F Z X& < & - 7

 Caine @Caine ()AAA) " "   h


# # X" Z  <

 "D&"  -
 "  .    
5'   

:  
 J: J  b U -  


J D  7 B X


< -
 ?
   ".  J 8 &


9  ". b .)

3+  Z  ".  cognitive constraints -


 G5 U 7

&   ( 9 ) b .0

.K   X: 

The brain is a complex dynamical system


The brain/mind is social brain
The search for meaning is innate

b - S
-
 J  Z .4

  
 3+  Z  J  Z .;
The search of meaning occurs through patterning
  
  I

5  7  .*
Emotions are critical to patterning
B& # < -   K &8 9 9 .>
Every brain simultaneously perceives And create parts and whols
 =
%  
 N'  3 "  5 .,
involves both focused attention and peripheral perception Learning
3     " .C
Learning always involves conscious and unconscious processes
:  XI
  ". 9
 & .A
We have at least two ways of organizing memory.
Spatial memory
 I
  ".e
Sets of systems for rote learning"E " ".
+j e
learning is developmental
  K <E D " .)1

brain based learning :O B H   := ""


D<E 9 -
.  '
R - X" Z  < b & - Z8 
B.
K5 - D<   7 
 B& D J : D F
. XR ^ R
" 8 =  `" J #
] 
<  ! @
 .I  & 
+
I & 
+  - I  & I
+  5 " Z X K 8 
 
- H  J "   D-
 
< "9 X 9 + < 

 .&
+ "   J   #3 e  ?V eI  & I
+  X99 
"9 Z X" Z    ! E 3+  <! =  J F K
<! "9  XI
 !    9 <! @ F
Z8   .J J F E 9
< 
+ -
 Z  @
+8
&  '
R  D 9 XI
< N 6-
 salk "=" B - : 
 3E<  K& B J B F 
. b + E< &
F
.
<  X!   <  ! "  . <

 B 
   S  
  9 " J.))
Complex learning is enhanced by challenge and inhibited by threat
Every brain is uniquely irganized I 
- 9
 ". 9 .)0

  XB 9 & % 59 6 X! 5


-'   
@   D
 T :- B3 
  "
 !
9 < 

F .-
 59 E - & % ?   
]  ! 73+
XR3 R & ? #  !  ?  - 
9  ? B '
R T

9 -  F   PF      .I
9  ' X%   
.69 7
 J B 79 S S X 5 S & ' ?  !
 - . # S 
: & I
E ! 23 
B. # = 
9 : F
D F 
   69  B9 3+  " #  I
- 
F  @
 "
"8   25 # 
9 N  'F =
% - " & " 

59 B
. -  9 & '  ! & ' 73+ @ 
.-

- g# Xobjectivism 5 ? D P! S ? .  6#  : E<

"8- 8- "/0 1& .3 4"! & $"+(  ) 

&' 
&  


  N *#(

&  




  N *#(

 B F 
  @G  J =
F
< J 
I  & !
.B  23 - V  S

<

&  Learining theory " - 
. !  J 
: T

    Z (Airasian & Walsh, 1997) "
 + "
B "  <   
J  F /! B  
 "B3
J  # @T
       .  < = X?3 K'T
.
 N 
     7' X!
< < 

XE-    
 N     
' - +V  ?& 
B
. ?& ' D  XB 
'  K9 ' 9 
: =  Z
B& B J B
.    X 9  
  & B J
K 
 .
-'  & B   I  @T
 Point of view
.
&' @  U   X
 N   23  K
 U-  [
9
X 9 "  - " J I
9  &
J
 J & -
E9  J
D5
 V  : 

- R
G
: "  U 7 J I
#
:   
:   
 .\9 3

Radical Constructivism: 
() 


! & J I


#
:  ?3 K'T :- "B 9 5 I B

 ! D5 S   J 75 R


+^   
& ! " 9

.' J B    


+ " 

U
< B- 7 X 7    l J 7
 F" 

: ' 
 N V   

#  "   -
 7
 J  I

5  - . # 
<

Trivial Consttructivism  !

# 
    9   .D S U# 
-  J  U "

   ...! 
& b
 Z X
E  - ! : 

 B  X 5 U# 


 
& !   '  . &


E+ ! R B  X ! " -


3& -" B

   - .U#    -


 B  #
  =  D
9

. Personal Constructivism

N <     .I
 
+ -  ?
 -  5 
+ 

Pioneer of !
< !
D5    -
  23 &

 N -
G Z  &
+  XD+ G5  B - 

:- N&  S  "D& &" constructivism

 !B '  -  &  XI  & I


+ U 7   9

"!   9


 B9 ' X"  J  I
E -
 J"

! 

" K - S
&
:V   
 " 9 -

 V 

  &  J  " & - [


 U  N - X"vabikity"

 ?& 
'  =B- 5      
 .I  & -
 

 7-  J .  K:  "  B 2  (<  )  

  J  


 " ".   X
+'  D  D-


< 9- e E' ? ' P E'  <+ -9: 


-'  3-'

S    
 . 9 J   progression of ideas
-'

"
-   <   J - 
 I

5 S
& !


P!  [
9 V 
 " ! " B   " -
3& -" 

- 
  - 25    "&'  <'  !3  &
J

N : P" ! 5-  P-


  !  #3  P-
 

.-
 &
< " J 
& !


E9 D&    
 X ! B ?& " 'T

! B
:T J &
J 
 " 
&   !  25  

.!
< @
+' I  &' B+

< J "truth" J 99 "B<  " Zalternatives

. 9  -: X&' !  J 


 
  K&   X" J

Cultural Constructivism 
.' 


Social Constructivism 
H)  


 D  - "" 7# &' ! " K


  J
.' D& 

X" J I
 I
E 
:T 
-' " &' "  

.G  7
     9    D5  X-9: 
V

  =
 
-' U&
   
#'  K# E'  " "B

   X 9  & "B<  D H   N&'  


. @


& !
' - +V   S .D<+ D 3+  " "B

I
E X D- &  . J &  ! &  &  

U&
 Collaborative learining  " J 
  "B X"

< B  + 


.'    ' X
<   - 

XU& B 
 ' J 
S "&-" J =  - 5< 
:

X
.'  
] Language G    E9.-<9  &'

Z  - " X 
- 9     K (Cabb, 1994) "?" J


< 9
 J
: B + J   '  X9<   ' ?& J

.
' - + ?& 
. 3  D T J ?& # &'

:-  <E 


 :

: +   :
< (perkins, 1998) "
"  " "    #

B + K:   ' 


-'  X". -
 K? U I  :'


-'    XI  J "B  " U  < & -' " 

? - .! : 


 @T
 
B
G - I '
:V : # :R:

     #3 "B <  Z: S#  5- "B  " &

J  .b ..."E  
7. -
 K  <-  3: J '

P
 
- " +  
 &
  : K

B - 
G    "   
 -  +  
 

:  &
' N
:    X&
' N : 

."  
  - 
G  
] X" 

-   6<  X" @G J   # . - 



(Wood et al.,1995) class discussion <E #  "B =
 J
- 
: B " +' Z  &
' N J .3  
.'E'  5
 " 


K J I
+     ? B D< !  

Crirical Constructivism 
 



 X"B!
V 
+' \# J I
9  X 9 9

<  X


75 B  X-9:  &' ! . - -


 K J  9 !
.

J I
9 ?& J "
!   B<
G U   XD& KE9'

 !  J..! N  J 7 B h3E'  S 9  B

X  &  " 9  < + X"  "   X



  7'  X?
&

.D 
  &  9

7
  "  D< ! ?  .-
  - I
B = 

?+ & -
 B X 9 ! (Taylor, 1996) "
" 7E

" - -
 J & - "  X <   D-
  J '

h3E3 U&
 = 
 
 X-
 K -9:  &' 

(Osborne &Fryberg, 1985)  7# -  .(


  ) 


&   9 
.  < .
-
 
. N : Z -9:

9 \5  !  I


-  -
 :- "  "
- @  

.  S 9 p  X
 3+  T ! < 9  J 

.
+  ' 7+ 
  -

G " "9 B K X 
Interactive Constructivism 
H 

:"
+'  XL+   :   D " D< !
.
Humman Constructivism "Q." P 
"  


S
 J 
: T (Hennessey,1994;Shymansky, 1994a)

< I
5    & E+ J
< B J J <   "

Appleton, Asoko, Burry, Stack,Buckworth, Muscella, yore. :"B

I  & -
 K- I  & -
 B9
   J  & ' 

   () "B-


   - S
B 9- ."
]

"J S "
E  I
E '  

 : .
-'  "
] U X"B   9< "  U < J 
#

-
 K  B- 
 (Novak, 1993) "=- " B h
E  N

H B " 2

J -
   J T ' ! - .J S "  I  &
B<5 J B<  I  #
+ ' & S -
 B<5

 )   2 :   X"B3< -  V   -  

K J
< V&    <- & - D  I
+ "B    


"B 2 =  - XV  < # 
-   (L+

 J @
+' "<  X I  & "<  #3  
  J

.I  & "B
+ ( I !  )  9
-'

9 -
 "!9
'  K&

B + J methods 


 - =  goals of education " E9

 ' "=- 7& " 9 I   ' "]


 .J E  ^ B-

. U "B< - 

- 2& S  X   E S 


+  "=- " ' !

   U B  -


 J
. ' -
 6-


&   " - -


 
.  J<    -
 ?


N
 
& K
 " D 
    
- K -
 -.N


 B<. J    J   '    ?&  X@   

. "B -3+' + -  I 

J "= -" J  - .-


 I  "
] E< 
  J

6<  J K  - 


  "9 L+  "  D

=  -
 K I   XJ S "   U& I  J E

#< 
G J I
9  ' 5 5 e6< e N XD 

" 2E    Conceptual change B<


G 

B Ethical #3+  T   - "&-" N


  U

 B  -


  H  "  .D - & &


<
G ?   ] N
 7  E  V professional


E @  - -
 K I  B H
 J  "Subsumptionn" H
'

 J  B  Negotiation 6<  -  # K5#

Conceptual B< "B< J -5


G 
    E

 topics 5  9  ' N  X 


  B 

E'  V  . 2& "



   . Understanding

N K9 - 


 ?   XS 9 
" @  J DG

'  
G . < "B< =  - U

G Z  J 
  S T


 
  
E B
+ @ E = .5

: !
E  X9  
& B
E -   -
 K I  H

<   
 U& J   ?& instructional methods

.Conceptual Framework <


  J E J 
 

J    D -    X    <

 J 3E "  "   B- ' ! D5


 S 9' 

."3 U &' "B< &


G 

. Qualitativel  <+ 9


 ' D-


 9
&  -
 - ' ! N S
. 9-


- K   J 

E  ' ! N  # J
 S 9' 

.3 3+   : E' 
  #  "  Z   5

   ' .


<  J   N
E D 9 "   J #  J <

+'
-  B9 
   XB< D direct observation I


N
   XN-
   B E 
J <   B- -
.

: X  #3 


 "< ". 

 : -
 -

-
. I  D - 

:N  R<

-
  I  & -
  
?   
< <
' K

 K
' Coob(1994) ? 7E 9- \  7E D   -

#  "  Z   5


< =
9 - 
  X <  !9

: & - ! K

.
+'   -
 ?& J

Individual Cognitive -


 ! K K
: 8

J teaching strategies 


 &
' ' ! 6


Sociocultral & -9: ! K K


 ::

U& B' ;



 J -
 passive reception  9 J 



&  U ?
9 ()AA,) "D&" 
.  N
- ' N&' 

+  J ! 
   '  rote learning E "

 ()ACA) Fosnot <  ()AC;e)ACAe)AA0) Von Glaserfeld Y

active participation D D


 ?  '  approaches

7+   Z  " - ."  "B< D   -


< !  J 


N   . V =  intensive interaction 


 < 

.D ?G  6
  B&  D    Z
< # U# 


.  cooperative group work  &  '

  D "S " D-


  " ' " "    D " E  "D&" 7


  one- toe one conversation


<
- ?+  debates

"I
 "    D @
- "S
-"  Perturbation "  G " 

 
] leihole-class activates  <E '  laboratories

."  -  ' "  I


   G     Puzzlement

.-
 K U&  '

 .-
 -9:  &'  J : N&' T @
+  
D Bakhting, leotev, Vygotsky + X7  X&-  3 @


   unique contribution I 


<  ' !
9

.& ' J D- 


  -
 &' E' - Z

- D&' ! D   S


 J -5' X
-' 9 B "B

Z  J  Z ()AA;) Rogoff "7&


"  " ! - = 
B.

<  -
< # 
# D& J59   =
 J K

Driver "
<
" <E  .
+' U ' -
-' =
  "

E  
" 9
.  -    thinking about thinking

B< ":  ! 



-'   D J " & B3

K - 9 -

 J -
   J 
 J  J

& 
  "     .JE+ @ J J  2E

.I  & -

<

 


:
  &. 
H
#  <<  U& <-  objectivism 5 ?


  
9 ()) "#
 & 25 .

5 ! &'  -9:
.&'
.& -9: ! K K
 -
 ! K K
 
9

"7'" N 

 - essentialism 
& <<  realisim

&' -9: ! K

-
 ! K


9 &

B 73+' D&  J   5


- ':   # Lakoff

&'  S
< < -


<
-

9 U#  


< 
  

". I '   

"

 ! - D




.-


 3+  7 B 9


  7 B 9


- B "9 &  -9:

&'  -9: '

<


< I
+

-9:   "'

<
<  "'

S
. "'


+' U
< 
 

< - X-
   . 

" 

D< -
 J < 

-9: 
 - =



 -
< 


". I ' H "E

< =  -9: .


< "<

      5


 <'  &  # = 6
<
: H   
 - .5
J D & B J  "B
J   X(3: "< ) -
   '    N   X-

H    U# - D S  9< "   5

B5 U H N D  PD5
 J U   := <'
J U  H N  U# 7- 5   = P6
<' H   X  9< "  U -
   J D5

=#- !    . #   9 7 "   B - D
"B& D   D5
 J U <' H    <+ 
   X  9< "  U#   " -
  S 6 "B5 U
S) X 73+   XI
G I
E U#  J
E J "B
: - (! &'  5 ?

&' 

   ":  X-


    D9 B S B '

-9: . 




!
-  & " 


I
&

I  3 -   I  


-9: 
 
&' 
I   !
-  &

& J
.

-3+'  "' U


."B 

J 3 N 




D& B&

    "   9- "  & D 5 ? 6


< .)
-
 J  &  ' XD- N & D99 XU#  : S 99 " 

7 B 9 <

I
+
 3- ":  N
+  D #3 '  J  6
< S  " 

#  ".  9< "  S D  ."    5 !9

. I
+   "   E< l J - .D-

' relation #3 properties E+ entites  I


E -  &

- 
 '  ' "    D S J  ! @
  -


E   
 "B ' 9- "  & ! & ' ?E


 .D 


+ J -5' XD   "B- J   .9< "   

XD   D  I


 D99 
E  .(D 99  ) "   

!

5  XD E   =    X"   
 

   E< ' 99 - ":  X  - N &  D- N &  B-

.D E  - &  2E   J & 3- ":  . D

!9 & '  XU#  99 :  


 3- =   .B -

.9 D5

epistemic -
 \5  5 ? "
 
 .;

D.   E+ 9


   9 - "   ".    
 

  XD#   9< "   -


  J 
    object

.B 3E<    9 & :  "  .     

.(D- D-
 5 S) "  B E 5 !9 J E  
.-
 \5  -
 K < - : ! "
  '

U#  I
E    mind 9
  5 ? 6
< .0
 
GE - N
E N +   . &   D
 D.

N
+  9 U#   E : :
 5 ? S -
 .*

- information prosser    D  S  J B

B9 @  -  "B -


 J "
- ":  X-
  

D S  " 


& 9  J inputs 3+  U  ' ?

 B  - X  Z   # E   . 9 5 U# 

. & 

. =  J<  

9 I
E b  9
  ! & ' ?E @
  conceptual system < . 9   I
< U#  K  XU# 
.N
< U#  K

-
 9 @  - Z -   5 " & - ": 
  "
J  D D& &  B  J 9
 < XU# 
.(-
 S)D 9 @
+'  X(U#  ) E' :

9< "   D S meaninig J  J 5 ? .4


". ?
- .   J  -
    9  9 - D:  


9 3+  BE< " J 23 25 &    J K

- 5 & X-


 5 "B<  
 ! 
]

: 

"B   - #  = B


  # <- 5# 
: XB "B
.

!  5  


9 (0) "#
 &

K' U#  -
   :  T  5  99  E I
- " B
PU#  =   U#   -
 9 @  J " J

5
Objectivism
  &
+
.
 J

!
Constructivism
DB< B&   N  

DBU#  : 


U#  K   

 9 B- 5


< 

I
+ . -  5
<


 I
+
" J H
+
 U# 

7
 L+ D3  U# 

.?
 N &  
<  
+ J ?
 


 E J "  " & J    XPD -


 U#   E< 7
 @  J "    "B =  9 !
 P-

U#  =  =
'  ' XU#  =  U U#   B J 9
E
  J X 9 " + 3+  S 9
E = 3+  " 
+V ! @ -
 - ":  .& '     XD# E J  9
:  -
  
  5 D ? S =  
G J
 3:   .U#   
+ J K' <   < 
D S 5  E =  B- 
 ' D  XU#  -
 '+ 
 .7  K  J
<   <  5 ? ?E
.< -
 "B
. - truth "99 " .<   # !  @
 - ":

:5 H 9 - -


 " - ! H
" - (5  ! ) &  73+' D& J 7
 U
:K5 - B  T
3+  -


 &
 .4

" @.0

 7 ' .)

."9 .>

"
 .*

"
 .;

    X# E -
    "B   "B -. viability " "
 =  
 # .-
 D

 J
<   J 
". <
 
 D  I 
  J  ! 
E
? '  < ! " .E' ?& J      -
 2E
 ' X99
 9 - =   Z X". 
 
:  -
 
(wheatly, 1991) .BE!E+

.
)( 

 
)
"U :''
?3 B&  J  ] ! H 9- 
 &
  -

.&H S( & S( 


 

 L#  := <
 Goals E9 I
E - ! H 9-  7 ' fE -

 X?9  Z 3+  D  &   X99  7#

5 Z X?3  "  & 5<  3+  

.  NB &' 5< 3+

XD99 ?3 U& J learning task " B 3 E9

&
 J 5 H 9- 
 &
   . individualized instruction S
< "

 "  XE+ ?  "  X&
 ?  " :
.  < 
 "  XDE &

   L+ personal goals (E+)   E9 J -5'


.I  J  3 I 
I
E -   7 ' ]E- 5 H 9-   "  9  behavioral objectives  7 
=   =  instructional designer  "E
 ]E " ": XI
GE    J D!& (" \5)

:
)( 
   : 

< D
 3+  D  7 ! H 9- " -

BE -  7 ' & : X   7  - K&


. D
  = !B

D J -5' X" "B U D


+ J  Z  X 
.D9 " I
 ! - =
 X D-

3+  @ E - & 5 H 9- "    X 
 - D5 (
: ) !3  & #
! D  X( D&
G ) D   &E E @  3+
.D   "9  " I
  '

:
)( 
  T :
'
3  "B I
E - ! H 9- " @    ] ."B#  3 I - E   99
I
E -    ] " @- 5 H     &
     
  J  

JE+ ? &
 G  @
+ G   
<  X+
7 3 9: 

 @  ? G - .(
 )
." \5
E - G E - &
 

( ))

S
+' 
< ?  6 !

.   :"2

# (5 ) D 5 & ' ?  ! 


9 

: - :


 I 
 ! H 9- " -

7
 =  X@
+' 
< ?  6 !  
9 J Z 


 
9  9 h<' & B- U Z " ! ". .)

J 7
 
9 N 6
 #   .B   ?
9 @  J

.

9
E  XI
+ # X @

:    X@  J  


< 
. N B J J 23 


.
' "   
E .0

+  
< 9   
< ? 
: 
  

- "  =  - D   XI


+ ?3 D ? H .4

.!
(;) "#
 X(4) "#
 25    J

-
 I  J   ' D.3 E D " 

 D "B 6 "9  < X cognitive apprenticeship
.=   # ". N
<  "B   ": D 9# .3
"B &'    IB&' : : tool kits "   '
- .;
.?3 U   "
.D9 " I
 =
 .*
"  U  ?#
 B- 5 H 9- "
  .S
<
.
 :""
9- "9  XN

  "9    GE ! " # :[  - & :- 5 H
:  "9 
  .
.+ "9  J8 "9  X!  "9

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
=
.  " "E  ' E- - !
<  B
9 -
      "

( ))

criterion referenced tests = &


 
+' D-  .?
."9 
 U& 3+ D  "9 -  =


.S

& "  &   (+) M E

  &. &  . (6) M E


& " &


Cognitivism 
. 

Behaviorism 
 "

B .<'  acquired B     -


 @


"B- X&
+  < & =
G    < " 9-

"      39 retieved B&


  retainrd

.  (&' e
: ) =
:V  T

I
+ J I
  relavant to Y 9 learner constructed
. prior-knowledge 9

.3 9 objectives "7 ' " J "  


  
conrollable "  measurable 9  observable
B 9   K' N 9  K'   - "
 : 

J " 
  B F -
 T- " 
  F 

controllef D- "


: I  9
 " ?&  99

&
D J ' ? IB& 
 9  
  X?


E+ 9
 D ?&  "
: " 9 D# J  stimuli

9  B computation theory " &


 
."   
. 

. 9 # X9 I 

. j  " < " &   - Z


Z developmental 
  "  -
 +  
. @
 
# I  &  9 - "    9 6  9   "9

   3+ " 9 J  ' ?


 " 
.   L
 E  &

 
+'  2  !- J ' "     

 ." R< 9 


+ X#  X7
   - .B

9 V .P -   & @   K   .=


G

I  ". 
  working memory  I
   "B
< -


 "9 =  J K . !9  3  J & - D]


-  

 bridge R
& - logical groupings 9 & I
E -

.
  
 
:'  X&  X&
2

what we

<  B-
    new information I  & 


- D J " J F
. -
     already know
U5-    mechanical responder  & ?&
 7# S
<
9 < U .?& 
 "B<' 3  3
 E+ !
< 
  J F ?
9  " S  %
- 
."
  processing acquired  &  Z

:B- 9  William Arthur "


:
^ " "  9 
5 "9  -

humanism 
":

X
< S  & "  X  N3
+ S  S 9 " "

U .
<
  J humanist psychology % < " 


  "  X :8 25 DB  S   " 

- V 3+  !
<E Z  "  @
  
. 
< 

."D @ KV  S B- 

.-  H   I


+


< 2E   '
< B 
  7 ' 
  
+ -

- =  becoming a better human being

X
E' J F 9 S "  & "  humanist % T

5-

-  " 
 U& % " 5 .
+j     "B< 

personal    &  intrinsic motivation (5 )

X" "9 X


< K X   J - " 
 " .+ = 

individual
<
< aspiration  J   growth

. +     8 7+ " + =  


#8 "

99 "  9 E3+ cooperation  "  uniquenee

"B&   X  


+  I <' B- "
  

 '   .D 9  D


+    X< D<  

"  ?& J F  %
<  S 9 " 9 J  =  X"B#

.high conceptual  


'  U B +

 "
 J +     .D&   "  XI 

6 !  B I


' ? 
9 6
 "  -

 .    negotiation 6<  cooperative learning

:   & 3+  =  @
+' 
< ? 

 7  XI  & 


K J " - I
:% "  ?&- !8
.-
  D
D XE+ I
+ - V &  <E " Z  +  B R9-

!  K ?  X"  -  K U5 "


  '

EF  
L3+ J drawing water from a well
. 
+

 = 3

>8
4

>;" :
 !$"+
))$
 %4
@(%?-
 =:

<$;:

     
 
)  & % "#$!    

    & + , * 0  1.

 ":;&.

   )  "  4$ 3


 &
$ 1 7  7 )$
."9$

 ! H 
   %

1 F  H! =,  


GE
)  
$= "#$I ! H
&  < \4 ", =, 7 )$
)  & 1   , 1
   $   :"9  
) &   U , :"9 %
1#   
+   ! H GE
 O0  + 
1)  !=
  1 &
= L  "K=
 +0  . 7  L " A 1 O ,   %#F
 =  $ UM % 
   IM   % $ 7
 )$ O . $ 
!1 1A  O 
  ` =,
 %  S
1 &
$  Q  7 +  )$ 0 
  3
1 aI;
 K  !O U $ . ) 1WX7
!W =,   YA   + K
; Q

=O  U 9 %,  !,L$


  e )  ,  O .
 4$
& )   OI  " 9
 g L 3   + ,
 , 0  ,
  1a
 %,)  
.

,    


&   )  ) OL$

 !, GOH
      1 =,
$.

0 "#$  7I  
U
;

 ;$B+

10 ; " .+

@D

 A    = % + , "HL
; "  
;  + 1 j  
   = ;   10$ + W +

;   $  K =

DF  %&
!$"+   3  KL  
$ K = ! K1c $
 
 3 ",    !, "#$

 IMX;O  "#$ = )  +


L       3 aIL$ I
  ")$  3b ) 3 = )   
 +   .


&   =,  O "
!;;4+
  
%
 !  + < =,

1; .!O


&  1O
  ;&   %
!;$"+
 1 .I   =, =O"#$
   =, =O
.b 1 j
 
) Y =, F&1 

0
&1 GOH
= L a .

;:
  
;
 
  
=,
& 1
   < &  
    
 &1
&
E  0 D
1  . A

&    "b =, "


  3 ;    O 
1  =,  3#  .I  +
 S
1  ! O %&
+ "
 31  %
1M 
& 7
 %!
=, "; 7 7E %
1M$
1 ;! !  = O % + ,
  3 !  3& +0 1c
1Md.

  19
  =O

 
1   &)$
7
 KA
 =.

 h   H aI %, 


1
L$  4$U
)    3
  O
   &)U! .

10 ; "  
;   1 + " ; "b$  = )  A  )
   i O =  A $  .+
 10U 3 ! .
) A U&e ! ! 
K$    
   +ke
 3  h
+  1

 0 +
1 . =O $ =,
"M  O!  ))& (  0
! K  K  .+
UO  + YOb
+ Ii L 3
,$ =  1
 
 7I   !  ))& ( 
 h  



k   +

&   )  43  %, (K


X %  :%
 e   = "   

 1,
=, K = ! 
.K

k    +X %  % ) % %&k;"



 1,
) % %&k;"
 ! 
=, =O  $ 3
 .

=O !  1
! =,  
 !
 I.


 A ;  &<
 ;    , =, =
.
& M 1 I   LU
 1 j   & %  1 O

1  % .

" 0$ %,U&e



i   + b   authentic

 A ; 1
1!QO9    H
I
 " 0$ %,i)$
  b!.H

=, =O  H ) c(%,


 =,) 1OA 1

  O!  ))& ( 1 =, F,
  ;"    &e ; 1.

-' 


&.   &. 


&.   &. 


 

  T  & ?E "B & B& # ! S
.  " 
 F E  7 : "BG T fE   -

< ? 7
how can we come to know what we know P 7
  -

Z  ! 23 : F T   &F  "B
  S
 
 =   F +  23 N 6
 -    -
 " - 
. B
! S
.  " "B<  

 (  ;
<. -
 . - :  <  !
.  "
functioning schemes
 U D<  & perturbation 5#   Z   
<
jeanpiaget D& &
< < N & V- "B< =  V   
& " 
 ! 
.  " :  ! S
. ".- =  - 
] '
knowing -
  V !9 B- !  8  U5  D
 D&

 D "9  J- 9 + -
 \5 K I F  K - 
-
 ?F  &  
.  - L+8  ! h
E
?& ":  "9  - I  B  '  -
 ?  D
.!  D&  Z    \ & S   F "
 !
9 +V  

  U& I  
+'  .3 J  9
 
 " +


 V
)


J !8 6 h


 9- "9  8 6 <- N
< 

 V  !  D&  "B:  B  :  ! S


. ?

@
+  - " =& S   h
V   =  :  <8

genetic 
 & ' K  E8 -  D& & 

 ?:  U :  J 


< ' 6
  .3 

< K D 


: epistemologists

- <k " # KE9' D I


E# ?
& D I  @
& D < I
B

D&  "  ( developmental psycychologists  < ")

 ? "B ?


  &  9  U# 6  F

= - D G  ( & ' ) -


 
. Z "'   

 I    # I
  :     T
  J


P  T N
: 'T

T B D K: N
<  7   <   ? .3 

P-
  

D&   '9 ' 6 J-


@
  7E J -

PD9 
  " D  
  B 

B<

P "   < -


  7
P N
< -  " +F 
# < 2E 
P -

< B ?  < & 
< = 
' D: # B- 
BE  9 : 
] !8 = 

"# ":   9


 + U5
B;  ; N
 < @&

< -
 ' ? < 
  S T  
 B &'

#
 D- .< @     I
 +  I
   

  &% *D&* 7- Z =  8


 : D 

8 -  .3 D   -


  7E - 3 &

-
  U 3+  T   & "  D& @
9 T

  9 : S&

 V - Z 


9 >1  D& . 9- ":  . " 3  <k

3 
   < &  :.3

 9
   D < =  -  <+
8    <8
<

' : S&

B  D E+ : &B =  - " + # "B  "   "B-


3  : .3

J  S %

()AC1 7   ) . (3 ) : S&

V
)
 H .  *" &.  

D& 
 
 ' " & J- 
< 
: 
 
 &

6
  ? D&  -
 ?' !
E  V h5 F

<  
 L+ J' D&B J   D E  J 9- 

N 6
 
  V NB #3   "D&"
- - "< 
8

  I
<  
. U5 # D & 9 . <8 S -


  "B< &  <+  "<

B    


  9 9
 NB  <' S -


V
)
 H &.   &. 
"" 
#

! B:   logical determinism 9 

TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE .  <

"9  J-  &   '  L+ constructivism

FIGURATIVE  -
 : -
    D& 


 <E logical operation 9   D& 5
-

U5
< - -
  
: -
  F
  KNOWLEDGE


 :   
 U
8  =  K < 9 

 L -  - \5


% &&  - 3: 
: S


S
E
< 
 sensori - metor stage 
 

 ? 2< \


-    # D I
 S
   ( 5
) &&

concrete stage operational   


 preoperational stage

K&   


: "   7
   8 -


 :  
] formal operational stage   


U  -
  9 I  -
 N U'  -
  B

  V L+   25    -


  - "D&" 
.

( K
&' -
) !
&' -
 " B  D& - 9 I 

 =  D-
 V
<   -
 ! D& 25 D- -


 F E  S  -


  OPERATIVE KNOWLEDGE

! 5
- #  D  D9 S 

5  6
< : :     S S - ' '

 N
E  -
 K < N
E   D 
  
  
]

 < "# K: - =    


  &  7 & 


- 
 :
E   Z -
 K -  +  '

<' D ? S   &  B5 I


 = 9 # #


: E<  l  - B  d- -


 " - 
. ! I


U     


9 &
   7 & I
 d-   N -
  #
 "9 S <

! 
:   ?
G !  F b .... D   ?
9  


G ? B&
G' "&'    I
  I
    = 3!#

 -8       ?
#'  .3  T  < "# !

I
E #  D   & 3 '  N 7 & I
 d-  & 

-' N !


:  U 7  ! B "9  9 

 F 9 B   K8 B


G  <  "B !
&' -
 - 

 9  ": 


:   < 7
  S T   9

- K' "B-  -


  7 & I
 U#
G: :   B 

U 9 7 &   ' S -


 "  9 D&

()AC4 X - S H
&)   . -  B 

D  IK 
:T

 -
 "  E+ D& K
 
:V 9 adapatation 7 : :
 " D&"  "  &  " & - D D <'

cognitive structures -


 ?
 : : :

N
 &
 E # D   !  NE -   " - B

" - -
 ?
 "B< B<  
 D&  " B- 

U 7 !   !  D


 D& " <   " -

S
 "P -
 ?
 = - -
 ?
 -   3]   -


 #  d- K5 I     : :    !  

?
   " + D- ! U ( & ) 7   '  " D&

".  -
< &    U      3# 5 ' -

3: ' " + F 7 =   N   I   ' : :  &

 biological acts & -'     #  \  5 F

 D& S
 :  ! G  6 "5B I  " + " <

' 7  D& S


  !   U 7  ! B "9

9  -
 ?
  & & 59 -
  9 7

D# 5   9- &  -'  & D# ' ! U

' 9 +

<  ! U ' 7   menal

acts 9 -'  &

 ' -


 ?
  -  & ?
  -
 ?
 7+

D   &  <  : :   5 9 D   & 

& =  D  ' =  B    I


 B.3

9  - <  ] <8   + F :   5 9

    5


' & .3  U' - 5
'

Dd- ":  I


 8 ( < ) ?
] ! " D< & # <  d-  

 # 6 D.3
 # ?
G   "  K

 " I   D
] D- - U9   L "9 N   <  & 3:-

 25   :  6
' N&   "&' 6 9  B 

# D  S S
< L "  " ?
- 
  K'   -

F F " : < = 


3+  -
 ?
    7

+8 
  K8 L+   
<
] ?
    F 


 (   
< 
 - S) N
  : - <  #

 K' L+ ?


 d- < 

 
'  K  L+

I
 D 5
 ": (?) I
 
E# () I
  (?)X ()

L+ ?
 : S
+ ?
 N

 V   


'
"8 

N V ": () I


 D  <+ d- () I
    (H) S
+
  (H) I
 V ?& Dd- (H) I
  () I
  
9

9  
98  L+ ?
  E  L+ ?
 

() I


 &F
E S  
- ?
  3E V # -
 ?
 V

D&"  9   


 D   N < &]     F

(   )  +  

 <  ?


  seriation

 .< ?


   "

  S  ! -


 .  9 ?
  5 "D&" S


 " + D-   7 E Z  d- 9  -


 7

9
   < I
- K: E+ I

G

?
 V <    F : 3:- 
< BB-  B ?


  ".  : 

KB  5
 B#  K   E 
 <+  
  &

? nF < -


 "   !   "     D& S


=  "9 - E &  DV- B5


V

E9    -


 ?
 -
     - !



P 9 ?
 V 7  

P      ".  " D&"

  
< 9 ?
  &    <  D& S


 D 
]
: 7 E  I  Dd- D  ! U < <  

+ 
E .< B  REFLEXES 
<  

 D9 - I & -


 ?
 " +    I
- S  

 b .... K  L  : SCHEMS ( % )   &%

" d-  =  


: 
< &

I  & 9 ?


   F S T  I

G  U5+

I   'F K G U5  ?& '  [


 K G
  3] 2< 

 9 I
:   - 2E DV- =  3 -
 ?
 D
- 

 < Z  D S ?


  I
E  F K G   ?& I  

  "    D& B   ?


5 disequilibrum

K8 L!E+ U "!3  !   K G U "& <+ K &8


S5  !   : : V 9 " D&  B:  

  ?& D  : K   DB&  S 7# &   7 #
7  &
 2E B& 6 B5   K   : 
"<  "  I
#
: B& T
:F -

] <8   +  F   ".    25 3: ?
5 
7    I
E d- " # "    D <#   99 
9 - -
 ?
  F <   9
:     B- B&  -
 ?
  F I
E + F
Assimilation
" F  D L+ -
 ?
 D  # 

 N
# <  d"    - 2E
: Dd-   B E -
 ?
 < S 
9  
 3: D 7+ # D8      ?'  F    N 9 #
" D  3: D  = 
]     -
  N  & & " U
9 #  '    = 
]    -
  N  & &
7
  - 9   \ ] <

  
:    < ?   F F S T #
 "B-   8  & D#
I  & -
 ?
  ]  N : S T  =  
   ".  K: :    = V D& 6
<
Assimilation 
'
?
 - B5 !   9   ! 9  

<  I  & -

Accommodation R
 &  ? -
  N     ! 9  

:
" D&"   E    ". 
E K   : 
 3+   Dd-  K ]   '- &  " 
2E S
+
E ! G 
! ?
 + B& F  Z !
E
G  D
  K &
  S5   K& 2E &
+
E :    S5
B S
+  "9 ! G I  :  D# K: S5  !
?& "< - ". 
 U& 3+ I  
 B D< "!3 B-

  D& d- &  D DF &  \  !-    "F
     =
 7 DV- #  I  D     .3
 & "+5   & "-  7+ 3: D-  F &  \
&
  ] S T #  9 '   D'T N < .3 F
- ?
  ? Z 9 - &  L+ -
 ?
 K<+  '    V
   "B  (#   ) D 
?
  -   D  < 9  &  L+ -
 ?

K    N    5  #   Z
Accommodation
 '    F < I  ":  7    F = K   S T
(* "#
5  U&
) S
+ I


  ".  5 "


(*) "#


L
  &  
" &;. FN" 
H G(# &(
 
H < ( 
) 
.V 5
 
 0

"  E 9: D&


- - !
"< 6
  B  
< d- ( K   :  #3  ) .  S
+  3+
- D  95   - K S &

S ? "B<  

G5   U 7 S -
 B   ":   I
E9 
D 5
 # S -

 -
 " "B<  7  25 # !  D&  V 6
 F
 & B &  -
 ?  5  D  !
" "
% : -
 " - D& 
. V 9 G- =  


. N & B  -
  &  !
.  23
constrictive Process !   -
 ?  V

< -
 ?
  . -   3+  " I
 
U
< 7 7 B ( K   : )   ".    
! -
 G5

. !  23  7 S  !  D&  V    
 ! E< 23  7 -
 " - 7 -
 " -
 " - ! 5
-'   3+

-

-
 "  ! D&
E &
-
 ?
   ".   ' &
  D&  -
 "
&  "   !   7  D  7 B
<
cognitive constraints -
 G5 U 7
 S T 
& "   U D< 3+
< I
+  

S -
 ?
 - 5#  
5'     F  ] G5
 D  (   )   ".  3+ 
<  ": 
<
N U 7 9 ":  -
     I F K   : 
V - ?E S K V V  < : :   -
 G5
95  S
+  - ?E  F \<
% < ] E 5
 I
E#
8  - D  : V - K S  < .3  
disturbance ?
5' D   H' ?E # Bd
. " N   U#  " \
E 
. 6  ":  <   -
 G5 ?
5'  :

5' I  7<+   &  ( 9 -8 )  regulations
!+  " B  Y 
5
 V - K ?E <  

8 B - E8 K S  F B
. -


 H &.   .
  J B
  D
+ 2E =  Z   "B< D& S I
+ NB J

E< I
E ! 23   5
-'  &  - 6


U D <   :  E   # B V 


 & 9 :

S
.   B 5
-  -
 " - 
. B<E

Meaningful J S " J  T !   G

!

"  learning for understanding "B< J "!9 " S Learning


.sense making learning J 5<
 -
 
 Z  # <  J F 
 9- G I
. < 
   D   .  ?
 =  .    I  & -
 .

Goal Oriented

V) 
W N" 5E 
 
H  <

:  - : " 5  & 6


-'  5
constrictive Process :
 
H .1
<< & %
.  -
 K   < 5 9

 " 9- G     U I  & 


+ <
  - ' U 

"   F 


 =   ! & ' 23   5


< < 
+ ". B5  I  & I
+ = 9- . N

( -
 .) I  & -
 ?
 " \ F  !  N
d

# I  & 
+
<

    ]  &  D
+ & Z

 25 3: ?
5   " 
 .  U D
+
< ".

I
 invention \ F   "B   " - ! N
  D ?


: 

 ' ! - ":  9 


+  D
  ".
< B 3+ 

< B  " 


  &    G <  

 B + B    UE  ( E< ) 



&
'


E
< <  "9- G I
.  I
+



 = 
]  ?  "  39 -
  b S  

D  ?59


<- 9 -
 ?
  D  K5 - 7#


 "B  !   " B Z  ' E< =-  9 -

E

D5 = ?+ - B#  K 



     
&

<  
+
 ?3 B-
 "  : E<  

 ? & D- .' <  S


 # <   5
-   5

 !  N


 " "B< E
  "B
 =  

D
  1  & -
 ?
 D  # !    ?59

 F N5 S 

 B
B- D
+ ". # -
 ?
  ( 
& I
E -


  K5  < D 2E <   3+ D


 K5
  ?5# S - : <
F D 2E <  3+ D
KF   
 ? &

DE D 
]  " - programmed learning &

D F 7 B    \  F 

 + < D I  -


"< ) -
    
 
& "  ' ! 

(Duffy & !   ?&     D 
 "B' !

D. 
+ -
& U5 K  B  "  Z ( 3:

D
 J- B S   D< -
 "  S Jonassen,1991)

"
  "
 ! N&' ?E
 F 
 I
E -


# 

Z  #   -
 ( S5) \ F  "    T 
Z  ?9  
B9 -
 ?
  . - 
: 
G

D9 "  K  5  7+ ' :V) 


W 
H  .6

  N Z    " b


 - Z   = B 
:  <#

B&  " - D& 5


]   '  ! "   -

K  - ":   


:  D -(Thomas Kuhn, 1962)

 - "B  6
] 9
< D 3+  5
 " !
.

 "  I  & 


   -
 .  -
 


 D +    5


  D I
 !  ?&  BB&  

E  I
- - 9 #  ]  9 H  + I  & -
 H

D   U- I# :  "  6


]8 N D&  \5 "

 
S  # d-    59 Z      

" 5
] I
- 25  I&
 D-  9 9 
 -
 D&

S
+ I
 
- K ": 

   I  &   .'


 " - 
 B9
 - <  

' "    G- < "   


: 5E 
H .7

 - B =  D D-


 N 2  -  U9 
E

 "  "  ! 

'F
  
: Z  I
. =- = ' 3!# D
 'F
+' 

B& "   =   "BF  "   ! #  -

K
&F - Y  I
.
<  Z  ":  &' U9 " ' 

- "9-   D&    =  " D< -


 7  ] E 9

 U# B- '
9 9 &' E )))) ' '  &

E # 6
< N
+   B  6
- h
# D# K5

' D99 J 6


] D  "  ' = < "9

   D<E " "B<   F D


&  I  & S
+

T ! @ " 5


]  
 
 & I
. NB
< 

 "  " 


E = ' =  L+  D ! ?E

D&  D  " 6


]'    

"  B   ' "B


]  D
]

Z

&H) K 
H I2  .   R NH? 
H  :''



 ;   E   L . 
; :
'

: 
2  0 social negotiation
 (  
)  E8 ! "B    ! 

9

[
9 25 Passion for life "I &B" "- E#  5- & " 


 .  S)  
& "    DB-
  '
<

3  
# J-  H
+ Z
  E9 N 5
< N 5

 B 3+     9- B   D 


  ( &' 

' 6 
 J- & "B
] non-achievers 
<+ 

U   bB F E  # 3+  5 B   D9 - B E+

  9 


   J+  ' "    - 
9 J-

S  N  # ":  "B D


 + 6< 3+ " =  
+8

B J-  2& ":  "B I  & ! 3  J N3 U&

(Bauersfeld , )ACC
 . NB   6< 3+   
<
1988)
!E9   
& # 3  &  6
< =  25 

I &B 
 B

 D E+   -
 D  7 "B - <   
 &   =  K'T   6
 - N  I
.
 D +V 
=
   F E 9- "B -  6< D!3

 3+  I   "B  D F E  8    ":  "B
 

  T 
=

 G &  F S T   &' 5<  F :  
=
 "< " ' ' 
 

  "!9 "  ]


   I &B    J
 #
 "    S
 Z problem centered learning 3
   "B
# - 9: "B  D   K  
I& I
E  B "
+   
. ' "B<    Z
meaning  E  "  ! 
    35 F "B9
 "  
 "BF 9  .<
&   making
    T !  D F D
&  I &B ":  h&
 < 
+ #3   S 99 " 3  " "B 
"B -
 N #3  S
 Z


< "  '  I
.  =
 
-8 E F :&'
 K B  K5  
  K    K'T < 9- "B 
<
  'F 3: < I
  
:T    "

 
:V E+ 9  ' -
 " H  N
]'  -


&
J- <+ "B Z @  "B+ & D< J   J '

5    spontaneous knowledge (   ) !9 -


 

E+ schemes -


 .  -
 ?
  J  "B-

 naive knowledge & -


  gut knowledge !8 -
 

"B< U - N   K5 J K5 


E9 # "B5- "B 

   <8 B -


  intuitive knowledge   -


 
- 
- :  @ @
+ !5
E 
+' 6 @ K5

-
 . "B<8  H  . - <8- ! U "B< 3+

J- 
  J
   J J- "B
 "]
"B I &  '

 K' =  B-   ! Z 


 .
< - B +

 "  B< - ":  @  + & D J ' #  J

#
   -
 . = 5 7   B "B
+

!  
E I

5   6
< J& 6<  5 D

 U& - I ! -9: 


:V B 

  "B - J 

<3 2 J 

& J- "

     !9:  -


 . N  5   T  G

N
- "B  h
  J <' U&-
' B  '
  "

# B  !   U 6


 # 
 .  #3

 J B  E ' # "B - =


 J J E J

V+ "B<  7
 :  I
. N Z  "   U 6



- I
E 59 6 #

# alternative conceptions   


E  misconception (
G )

C(  R B"" 5E   prior knowledge 


 .  : 

  F I
. N  I
+8   - 
 Z8 
  

: B 

9 "<  !  "<  & "B  


 <8 + 


  9 " -
  -
 < K  "
G ! @


B:   -
 U '  
 .  pre- conception

 9 D-
 I  & " -
  <  Z J K 


E ' :  
 V+ "< N  K

 : -
 N  9- J S "  J- B  


  B  

#  (pines &West ,1986) " 9  F I  & -


 D
 S

 - J   &


U
D  K
- N & JG  9-   


    U S &  9 :  Z =   

  
G 
 - G #   

# 
  B F I
'
& B 9 :   " 9 ] -
 N
? - ! H 

 " F __ + S__ BB  -


 G5 N U "K  B 

 V+ "< =


G    "9  J- D< h
 @ T 

.K9 &   E

  ?E #   "<  <'


+ 3+  
 .

 9 =  &  -


 G5  E9  "
 [
9  # 

G 9 V+ "< N  I   Z ! 5   

D# U -  ' J 


< B
 J I
+
E J -
 G5

-
 . J- : # . # B J
. -' I
E

I
 (Antonio, 1998)    
  ! E  D ": 

.( J& " J)




?
5'    Z    :  -
 G5 F 9  S
+

 
  & ?3   =  3: Z ! 5 9-

- D< h
 T :   D I  & I
+ N

 &
< S -


J  J!5 K I
. 
# "B  "]
 
  B +V 

G5 U 7 #
<   D " S
  : N T "9 

 J: K J      T ]    "B 25

P D
+  
 -
 -


N
 + "B<
: @  =   25 !5 # & J- 


  -
 G5 6
    6
<  G T ]E I %

D D    -


 ? J 9 -

E  I
E

B5
 "41 B  @   S
 D - :  I
E -

N
]  H   #   -
 ? J- J! H ?E

B  7 
 D&  D!# E 8 B 9 ")1 B<
 ")*

J-
 " H 

  I
  "3 
  ? 7-  
  


5X 0 R 


 - #  
H  T#) L;: "2

  I
  "3 
  ? 7-  
  


:  N2 B H " 


. 

" D 9  ( 7 S)   # "  F : 9  P 

? J- h
   ! @5
 [  "< 6
-'  

S  2E  E S
< F 9 \
 # F ( 7 " S) B

U "T3 G 5 < Z   ! -X I  & 


  


D      #


<  
 ! S
. 
]  

=  Z X K9 &   environmental constrate

! G5

S  S ) B#  ! =  =  D 9   S viable 

 X -
 G5 U 7  % "#  (D  J) 5
8


 " ":  (    I
  "3 
  ?  D

S ( -
 +  ) -
 ?
 - 
G Z F 3+

'  "B-
 -  V+  & F  2E    & ' D

 B  X 
 V schemes %

" S  S)  - : -


 G5  ?G 
< 
 " 

U -
 ! 7 J F 7 B X(K   : )   ".   ^

I
Y  - X  I  ?
& 
< J d- ":  X(
  ?)

.! -
 G5

S   `# ! D 9  J F F E J  N  

Y5
-' Y & J -
 " - 
. 
 ! 


Y! ?
&  D XD  D9 Dd- =  " " F .   D

:
   X8

Y E J K+8    ?


' 5
 =  -  . 
+^ 3
R 

.D& 5
] I
  !  "

!Y I
Y. Y ' B F
. < @
+ 
& 9 :   .

.99 B   D&    " 7


. 5- " VB

3Y- XB  "   RK& : F K+8 =  


 F X" K+8

UY & 6<  3+  D-



< K I F "  5

KY: KY+k DY


J " ? ' =  J ?
 K+  "

.
+j

Y: " 7#  N& RF D ? 9-  XR


& ?
DV " 

.J S " K  


 " 9 -


.()AC>X 
 
)

Y-
 GY5 U "K  < Z F  XS
& "   7 B


 K+8 =  : - D K: " \#  =
F  ?& =  

.
< I
+ J 


DY  5
 S < " R K+8 = & J D  XDB< ?&

:  [  :3: - ! 


.  I9 < 23
E 

.D3 

.= ?
  '
R  "B<  J   8 KF ?&

.-
 " - 
. 
 ! 23 &F

 B]  B

 B ?3 -  :   6
<  ?&

Y
. 
 ! 23 
   +  &  -

.Kk "B
.

TY  &% 3+  =  "D& &"  J V -


 " -

"  B J #


] "B&  ?3 K+ J F
. ?&

: 

(Von Glaserfeld,1989) ?3 "B<

P7
  -
 E 7 @
+ I
 P-

< ? 7
Y-
 Y D
3+  T B  &F J F "D&" E #
Y "Y I
  !   -
 ?    T X <k
3+  X
< -
   .   3+

YB YT
 # X!  -  
"
 !
# U #  
" - 
. B J F -5% X(& ' ) -
 - 
. 


0 

 " 




 F
. 

 &  &  paradigm (A)GE : B J XR5 -

.-
 ?
 Y  theory of knowing " <
3& -"
E  # T
= F
Y
 F .(Goodman,1984) "Y &" "B<   R 
# T
=
Y 
YE Y Y philosophy of understanding "YB< - <psychology of understanding "B< & 
"D&" 
 <- ! 
  =!  U R5 J#3 = T
 
&  B J B   U Piagetian perspective
.educational epistemology

#3  " !


E " +' + U5 " :DV "l " D-

Y& Y  7
.   7#  &3 D-  Z XB- 

."I  7 8 9 D!   D - 
G Z F XI  
+ DF
:&): L
 
&
Y
Y  D 7 B  X" 
     " "E
  @ J =  X  
 :  @ J &

Y  9 7
 U 7
  < .9    
: :

Y  D& 
  - B 7+ D  X <E    J F
. ".   '
R  "
 "E H " +  6
G
XY I
-    " E   "E H " + \
 " H K - I  
& J F H N " + U  U&

Y- 
   " + H N  & X<< ' K: .9< 
Y e Y  " F 8 6
G   - .(<)  I
E
Y- "Y "YE 

5 B 9  8  Z 8 &
E
: -  
 H  U< :   ." \5 
 K7
.D
F \
 +

" "E
! X-
  X 
" "E 7

Y- YB  6
Y<  '&  instructional Design  "E
: Y  Y&  Y Z X  j - E+  K &8
.  
 U& D+ 
  RK
I  &
JY DY J F I
%
& ." "E <+ 7
  - 6

&  F R-3+ D.   'F X" "E <+ 7
 &  "]

7
Y NY  .T
   B-    X]E Z  .<
G
.()AA;XN
 -)
XY! 7
. HF   " :D J " "E Merrill " 
" 7

" 
" ? .D -
G Z F J F S T  J < J F " U- 
 ! U D< - D " .3 " 5- X=    J F
.DE "#   - "9 J L+   XD&  E 

   "B< "B S  " :DV reigeluth "Z&
" D-

-
G 9 ?8 " 9
 B 3+ 

9     X 

."  7 B
B& U&  X \5 
B  -


.  K3  K
+  E'
."  @ ?
 ". 

# - I 

.Y<  Y9  Y9 JY "9 S " ? " 7#  S

:VY- X:3: 6
]8 N   + J F  "E H ". J '

." #

 V J 
B.' 

.K3 Y E' 8 - =   X\


 +  R  +'

Y I Y IY
 "'
 &  2E " "E  K5 -

HY N   ?& 3- 



] K3  E3  ^ H  d-

:B !

H  &
   @
+ B&  ."B<
] ?%  E<  <

JY "  " B T  U#  7!. K5 - "E "  .)


.K 
RY<. RY5 
 sub-system 
- ". 
E<
 .0

Y "- X "E  E+ 23 6  D&  R! " 9 
= Y Y X@ '& 7+ - 
<  E< " 9 = 
. H E B   U#    @

YT  . B   @


+8 
< .8  N
G

I F  ? " "E - I  


B  [     F

.

 9 I
E N J E<   '
R 9  "- .
E< -
.

." ?  ?   IB&8  


- .4

+" 9  E< 2E  XK B   Z  B J "  

"Y Y UY JY   9    B&


+ .;

 :-
  Z 7 B !9   
    "B< " 

.I
 & -  I
GE & - XS
<
Y
   K  <+ 
E 
E< 
.*
. 
  I
&   R&
+  "
E
\ " !
 9' IB& 
 : : E' !
- .>
.<+   E' IB& 

 9 J5< " R B  E  - B D E< 2E
"
 =  R
G B< V  I
E  R
:  I
E  ".
9 .D 
  
  "  X-
 
E   "- D<.


5
&  N
 9  X" ! "E  " <. E
<+ !
+  X 7#  "E J F 
.  9 9
 

. B&  IB&8 - 8   


 
 I
 .,

7#    "  < 9 + S  X


E

  K9 9   \  !


  L
-
- .Y

! 
. D S    X"  B  " B F .

- 
+ 6 ?3   I   - "B!3 ?3

: 9   -


  9 I
E J 
!: X 
 J

.<+ -
 '&

" B&  - & ?


 

# B& '& N J F H S  XD- g S 9


E 

-  8 B


 I  6
]8 EE+ E< F ./

.9 'j  ! J B&

I  " "  "  " " E- : : @


+8 
E<

Y9- Y R

5   "E 
B ?   25  

"


"B< VY Y- < T  D


F -
   D
 - "   X "E

:B 8 6 D#   X N


  " "#

.)1

.D
- " J 
 ?

Y YB- Y  !  9 &


+ 
  



 ) &. N  ;)

Y B- S
&   !   T  U& &

-  +
:8 ?8  ". ?  J <'  "]
J e

."

LYE+ !Y
Y: 6 d- I
    ' e "E

. 7 8 U5 XB


 I   
 7 8 U5



] 
 B + J F  U  "E - ". H  -

."
< L!E+ 9 + 
 

"E   - ? " + ()AA4X= ) T  .+ ?V

.  !  


+  
I  @ 

Y# I
  9 XK 8 &  ? 7. 5  ".

.= &
 
+' "E

". J
 R
 U5 XI   ". "E  B#
G 

 S  ".  -


 &
'  
 
  

.
 % K k I 

.D

Y
Y Y- Y ".   R   R =  e
 F  9 
+ K
&% 6   =   B "E

.! "9  "9


 X LE+ - R   3
R T   "  "B N H

Y K 
 - B +   ". "E 9  K
&%


 5 J R
# R 
F X E   E' J R
# R& 

.
%   B
   <8 "  +

7 8 9 - " h& @    "9 J R


#   X

 
8  !
+  " 7E  
 
. J F & 

"E 
B    F 7+ 

 
 d- =  .I 

". "E  - I+  8 =  @E9 8

  J F    X


%  J N

E9 - X"
-   =  .  +  9  
 

XY!  -
  
. B&  " "E 6
 "  -

=Y Y<  K
Y&F " 7E 
. -  B "9  KB  

Y YG I Y
.  " "E
 J 7
   - = 

. !
+ E+ I+ K: 
.

.
. N 23  
.   Z    .T

R R  B ."    !3


:8 D&  'T = e


 " 


Y- "Y - N
  X" I
+  
   ! D& R  


Y Y Experimental Psychology Y
& <Y " - &

J !# !   Z   X99  J J F D E XD 

"
Y" XWatson "Y " DY# Y + Y X:  J 8  

JY '
R Y:   " ?  LE+ e=
 S
<  B&

UY-   U- 
  9 5
  Thorndike "= 
:" XSkinner

2Y Y:  9  E+ X  &



 D& G5

Y  N  S
. = I   J < "  X=

J I
9   S
< E  X -
: !
  J E 

.=
< -


&
Ya R
+  3
R < R<
:  "E J E  B

Learning "Y Y


. 
Y Y
 
< - +  
: #

Y# Y< &'  X


 S
< ?
 R<  

Programmed Instruction. 
 "  Theory

-  "E J F D& D&    <+ . ? 

:  ! 6
 & Z  "   
 ?E @


<YE 3Y+ Y D3 J F 6


   X!
< + .

- .
G  9 "   .
:   & & D 

. 

% K )  !



 
  .
: D5
   ! =
 XN  &' N : (
: < J
) &' < (  



 B H ;"  
 


5    "B  X


: &' 
  =    

 @
+ &  99 
 D W.James " & " " @


.5
 !E%  J V " 9 

!9   2E .


  - 5-  J B .< X 9 - !9
J J F B   X99 N D  7+ : B 

-  
'   B !9 N  .2  E] 
  .B. -
 K - U  
  7
 - 
-8  
" "E J F  D S  X!
<   S
9<  :
.DEV B F
  
  N


Thorndike ()C,;e)A;A) "= 


:" e4

 
 8 
.

Y- R YT
-
 & - " & " " U
X
 S
 < "  *

Pavlov ()A4>e)C;A) "7-" e)

S
 < " - 
. N 
: # .  " F " - D
.

&' ) 
  < < "   X
& - "  *

.  
# 7E I  
8 Educational Psychology

Y" "
Y ' -" D
B  X(

] Z !9

  3+  "  X
B  XK  X9 - = 
:  
 *

."I
+

 of training Transfer ?



: 9 =  "Error and Trial" V+ 

JY 
&  D
& 3+  
  < I
- J F E # *


  
 9 I
B  " -  
. = 
: H
+

Y- X
Y&  

: U "  
: " 9

 ?3

Law of Effect & 


:8 # Exercise of Law

.D
. J F E  "?  F"  =   
 &

Skinner ()A;1e)AA1) "


" e;

Watson ()C,Ce)A*C) " " e0

  J  J  D  X!


&% 
'


Reinforcement
Hull " " e*

Y <Y "Y F" 3


R !# )AC; " "= " D - "  &" ? *

+'  KE%  I
9 - < T I  D " - LE+ 
 < " 
:3:   = 2E H V " " 9 .G " 

< B 6
 
: - .[S-O-R] &' X ! X
:
E
. !  73+ B& D& 7+
 +  
G J B5
-  = - . D
. - " "  *

S
. D-  . " 5 
& \
- 'F   
.
Y RY RKY&   K ' 
 ' .= - "  T 
"#

! K  XB T  
 N 
"  " "
 *
9 .= H3 < ? - 
:T  
 "B& -  

:  3% 3+  


F &   I
 " V  
.
+^

.S:   J 8   X&'  XU-  I


:F

Response Stimulus &' 


: :'
R 

Tolman " " e>


    9 ' ' J S  XI 9 =   

" - D

B 
<  & - < "  X
 < " 

.D# DT
 S &' 
:  <  < -8

.sign learning "S


% " " D F E 
B  .-
 =
F !
+

" 9  
:  & 
  < &
G  U -

9 + I
E  Cognitive Maps "-
 !
+ "  F -5% 

.D F

.9 D
+ K5 J
< D Schemata


< = T U  & D  S
:    F


 NB !

-8

.
< = - "  U d-
: - "  F =  X=  

: !

-8  & J  
 

:&'   =


Elicited Response I
. & .)
.
: & - Z   &' 
: & .0
I
. &'  <+  . !  I
E 
 
.!
&% &' " \  "
" J # .
: &  &
Conditioning 
' :R:
:
'   =
Respondent (Classical) .3  &% 
' .)
. # &  &
: D-
: X"    
.3  Pavlov "7-" 
"  
'  \ 
 #
K5 D 
 '   Z J 8   -
: " + \  
. " 9 U 75

." "E J 


- 

:=  J :

 S 9 3+  I
E " J  

- 

3 - "B  
-8 ".   . E !
"   8 ?
B .)

XE+ I
E " "E & J   X 
9   

." &
& E \ 

:- =  J&

Operation Conditioning !
&% 
' .0

 7 8 
 e

 & \F  & I  & & ? D- " "    


 " 
  'j
B. e
Teachin Machine Phase and Programmed Instruction Movement
Individualized Instructional Approaches

< " +  e

.)AC4 " "


" < "  &'  \ 
 "# 9  .
< 

Behavioral objectives movement

 I  " e

Computer Assisted Learning

" - ". +  e

Systems Approach to instruction

. 7 8 
 :'
R 
# !B  I
E - " 7  
  7 8 fE
I
E B]E - +   .    LE+  X"
K  7 k <E I  5 # (Schwier,1998)(ABCD)I
E+
" "D  "" 7E -  
 <  X &  X-
 X
- :  + )A,0 " R<E Gage "D&" " #  .)A*>
I
B  XN&'  X-
 &
' X9 
B  X.< 
.


  = .=  -     J \  
.&%     :
?
9  N& -
E
  g   -    :=  J :
  N

 - D E K -  d- .N J E 


. 
  J E J @
+ 
  d- 'F X
+^ # - @
+ I

Behavior Modification =   :R : :
:=   
 B& D-    + + - 6

.=  9 7 8 U5 .)
.?    .0
.=
G  &
' K9 .4
.! & B <  K
&% 9 .;
. 
< H F D  " 9 "9

!
&' 
' I
- J F )A*; "  D ^ "
" " # e

  R#3 7 8   


%  Briggs "&
" "D&"


G J9  T J ?&    "  ?  

KB )A>0 " "


 7 8 ]E" D - B #  Mager "
&"

" Holand " ' "


"  # .D& E  &

7 8  + GE  ".   


9   9

X

9 
:   ! '
 
: - 


task analysis  I   E ?


 H \ X

D "# S
<   D9
 
 " 9- 
+  -  
(Saettler, 1990)
.
 
 2 :''
=  X 
9   I
- -   J "

9 +   
:   J
:- + = 23 J& (1963) Keller Plan "
" + .)
individually paced 
-   + 
mastery  " 
B " -  6
  
5 
.EE+ "  X&
 ^ E
" + 
Individually Prescribed Instruction IPI 
- D& " .0
:(1964)
" Z 

 S S
-' "   =  23 J&
:   J 
 "H
" &  
  B& 

. 9  .3 # = I


E - 7 8 B fE I
GE K & J F
Competency Based Education < J !9 
 I
- 
B.
. I
d E - 
B.  Accountability  ' 
  
.
 " 
  'j :R:
2E  + # "S
" "

" X" "     "]
J
'j  
 "  & " #  5- : "
"  'F 
 "
:   J E  - B% U  .
" 
K9 - )A0* "  
+'  ^ Pressey "
" " # e
.
8 <
 D&F  " V Chemosheets   Peterson "
"
 e
.&
B. ! I  3+
.  j I  &   +  
8 -  e
- 
8 &  9 &
  R
< R Crowder

 "E
.
 F I  "BB&   E J "B
 +

 7 ' 
  + 
"  5
 IK
9 " + 


" 2  G


< #  -5' X"   

 B- "
." \5 - D  - " U  
Systems Approach to Instruction
 &.  2 :"2
  + - E+ X
 -  !
+ U ". +  ". D
 ". 
 T
   " 9 ." N
 - " "E B
(Schiffman, 1995)  ". "E

I     # 
+ 5
 7 ' 9 


 "   "9 
&' "!3  " 
 .4
Program for Learning in Accordance with Needs
"   
9 - 
+  - Flanagan &3- N

:D3
 7  >111   " 
<
 9 
+ J  99 "  J   "  "  
G 
7 
 " 

+' I F  35- &3 " 


Computer Assisted Instruction 
 NH"
 := 

9  + K: ?
  
 - '
 I  " " +
" D E
  -
  ": X IBM 
     


 I  "  @     . 
'   
Control data corporation and mitre  - 
 
"  B -   Xplato, ticcit 
 &  corporation
S < 9 3    <  &
 L9 
: \# 

  ?
 J
 I  " 
  35- 
 
 drill and practice

 ". "E  ". 


 T


:
 " < B? N"
 S(

Behaviorism and teaching 


 " " 4.


"E "&
 &" H  E J F I   "E H 

: 

: I+ I
 
  H    "

N
      
: ?&
&   "

    7 8  .)

."  - &


] 

B5
 <  I   .0

: 

" D5
 9
  \5   .4

 ! K  T D U9 .B- "  "  
 

B
  "B   .;

  [   + =     "9  X = B- 2E

  7 8  .*

.S
< "  U ?#
 "   =

    7 8 N 7


 .>

:
 


 I

5 .,

" !  ]    e

    !


+ .C

Z  B- " X"  " ! "E 


 "5 & "9 e

N " K  # .A


 ?  I
 U &'  
:  

" " F

.)1

 "9 K
&F

.))

:&.  

 "9 J K 


9 3  K
&F

.)0

  " S  atomistic S


  @ -
 " e

& "9 K
&F

.)4

.E &' Z 

. 
 I
E I  J I   I
GE -


 T - " +3 

9

:

:E
   U
.+ "9 .H

.^ "9 .?

.!  "9 .

D F E F  =   S = &


 
+' D-  e
E J @
+ D-  S
% 
 D F E " F < 9- 
.? = J F

 I - Xh& D  D] X " # 


: " 9 e
 G      &
+  - 

:
 " . 
:& "  "  

.

 ":  "  U# = !B 7 8  e


D&  XK 8 =  D!5 J "9 S  D ?  K 8
:
.  


J  # .+ !   R


 V -
 "
. B& 

.D99 D 25  7  J 



&  " D:   # &' 
: 
.  # e

U&
 The cognitive Revolution -
 I
: " +
  

X #  < DE   S 


:   E

:!
 I
: N

"  J <


9 F  K7 " +' ?& 

- I: :  S  :   ?


 

B. .)
b - Z  J 9  & Z X-

.
B.
J  U
<  J
.  . &  K: S


" &
+ # - h&  " I  - K 8
. B
K: E< -  B " F   <  B e

 stimulus
: 2E 9- .
 IB& - Z  

]

"  &



@ " F =   


 B Z   output H


+  response &'  X + 

" " I
-

information processing.  &  

."  - " 


 &
 !   - " e

"& " K " Z X Gestalt Psychology & < "
:V
  =
'  NB I
  9: E 
< ! '
?& " 
V : 9'  < K -
 =
 9  ." 

:
 " "  V)  

.  '   p a
.  % = !   e

Z ! 3+  "  ?& " 


.
   X5  

 XRote learning X"E " J V  X\  ! D F

Z - !
 &
+ ". J  
 -   .
&

.-
     ?&

'' 
E "B  -
 9 X&' 
: 3 S =
+ -
   

U9 U5 J 


#
] 3 - X   
' " e
.
+^ 7# J B9  -

 ' 
 "   T
   
B  " 
."  - -9:   

 J F
 ' . "B

-
]   " " ' 
- readiness '   .4

d- X= - "  T  7 B  .&' N  

& S 7# 
' D. J I
 &
 
< D  .;

 ? -  -


 !  U
G - B -
  &

DI  & 
+ N' "#   X J  " &  " U .*

J E &' J E    "  7 B - D . 


&' J E     " - . E  " +

XJ   B& 7 B  I &  9 


+  B
 


&
 7 B J S T ' & S X # \
 - E

B9 X
   " + 3+  B&
  D
  - B+

.E  " + &' J E  "B  X ! 

.I  & 7# 

N 
B. - X 
T !' D  I
 =  -
 @


S \5 U < 
: 2E   ?
  " -

G .>
D " 9

I # " S
 +   h5 = 
B. X=
E ?& !'

 ?
 K!- X 9
- NK
   J ?
 B- : I
!

" -
 9 &
G " + J ?
 - 
 .,

D  ?
 
 -   # " - .7#  D-
 D 9

D& " &  -


 D J B
& J D. D! 

B- D U



9  D U5+  U - I
! 9 J &  

  

. 7# - "

X3 -
 '
-  3+  " 9 ' &
 .C
   7 B I  & 
+ U <  
- 

5
-'  & J -
 " - 
. 
 -
 


.B!
:  B  -


:
   ' assumptions
I  &
-  9 
+ 
-' ?
 I  " 5 .)

:&.    


 Z<
Edward Tolman "5 <" .%

 &  " "9   " Z  .0


.-
  I
E - I  & -
 :
< J ?& " Z  

" Cognitive Maps in


  
!< -
 !
+
 
 < "  

  "   
!< J D
& 3+  rats & Men"
U 6# N
   ! 
'  -
 !&

I  &  
. E3+ : I  & I   9 " + .0
. 9 -
  B

U&  I  &  K -  I & 9    .4
.B9 9 -
 9 J ?3

:  "


E 
 "   9  " "  "= 
:" 
.
stimulus and response &' 
Jerome S.Bruner " 
)" .7
J "

 "  9  ." - -
 
 ' : "

"

 . &  - " K& "social interaction" &' <

Jean Piaget V
)
 ) .+


< E  The discovery Theory 7' " 
. "

"

.D< -
 J

". D  X  


9  
 - D:   S
 Z 
3  -
 D
.
 .I
E -

 
. J
:V
"B
] "D&"  . 
 !8  &  + <k <

David Ausubel "Z< 



" .6

 -
 ?& J E D  Z XB!+  &% E @ 

Advance organizer " 9   3B' ". &


 " " h
#

I  .3  D
 . < B +  9  9 '

. 9 I  &   9 -


 
 \&
 " 2 S 

:  J D&   

- J " &   3B 2E " F " !9 I


< J D
. 


  U :
   < &  9
  e
.!
X@
+'  B  E< 9   "   e
.D '   9
 " + " -

  


Z   D 5 " "

#  ."I  & 


J
: 2E  J    " I
+ - 9 -
  I  &
.I  &  " "    "
: X" #  " +  &
  "" 9 ". " &
 

 J readiness" ' "   J "D&"  =   "  5 

I  B  .
 I  & I  6
 # "   " "3 L+

- .? 
 < @    ' +    

:23


  " 9 -  -
  = "D&" 
 
.
.accommodation 7  assimilation :  @
+^ J

E+ S

: .)
.:    9 -
 B  
  bridge E  +

 39 9 :-I'  (   )  S( .%

Vygotsky "&" )
." .+

@   I
  9 ": @  I
E# I
  -    3+ 

"S   9 " I


- " #  X& -9: 
. " #  < " 

..<


<   &- @
 . "the zone of proximal development"

B 9 :Short Terem Memory (STM) T N


M N( .7

9 . 3  " U 3<     


  

  " + 
 : 01 )1  B <'  B 3+ 

 X < " 9 interaction < 3+  X5  " D
.

D - I     @  I
E# I
   Rehearse. U

J actual developmental level porential  < @  J

Z RCZ) 4
5 H 

Z2 ;M N
Z 
(0,)

 developmental level potential


  @  J 

.B  C(  &? 
 

the zone of proximal S   @ &  

+ :Long Term Memory(LTM) T 


5 N( .6
J I
9  I
 +    @   " +3 
.&  @     .<'
     :Meaningful Effects B  ( 
'[ .+

 
 < @  - " DV D-
   development
N   
  @  39  
<



  "J &-"  " - "_  L+ D& I    



 J B- " 
 "  " 
 - "  &
."
9  
B


" \  .
 B  B   " J
B B bE -
 D - V
] 

 B :Serial Position effects    " " 
'[ .3
.B U9  = 
: !9
+   U9  
 ?
  
  :Practice Effects " 
' .9
LE U- .
 N U   ' X K9

Simon"" Chomsky" J" .>


K & T  ""
B G "  "" 

 # -
 
 
  artificial intelligence E'
.-

< <E J 5  E

. 
:V " I  " 
 

J 9 
+ "
: 9 D E9 :Transfer Effects ' 

:
.  
 &. 
""
#

.I  & 
+ "
.,

 B 
9   + -
   : Schema 
.  


+ U "K  
G  B   B&  -
   .I  &
.I  &

   B E9 :Metacognition .  R 

.%6


 9 &
'  X.<  "B<  
<  X -
  9
.B- "  3 

I
+ +    Z  :Interference Effects 2 
'[
.   I
+ U 9 
!9  +  7E  :Organization Effects
 
'[ .Y
.
 B  2E 


 -
 @
 :Effective Instruction  


.%+

Internal " -


  ?+ S 
  < 

 J &
9 J "  X H "!3 XSchema
K J "!9 7'  Information Processing  & 
." 9 - "< 

@ 
: - 
< &   : #'< )  
" ./
.
 B B&  &
  
!
< "  :State Context Effect &
 4
" 
'[

.%1

.
+  S 
:    - N
 D B   - 
&
  :Mnemonies effects N( 
 
'[

.%%

&
  ) D J  
]   3+  ". " B +
.J   
E  ''  # - (
:Cognitive Teaching Models 
. 
 S(

 
 ?E :Schema Effects 
.  & '<

.%7

X" 
. !9 I
E   JG " 
.  "

" @
 

:V  N "B- d- =  X-



< J "!3 ?  "

" "
] " &" ""  "D&" "

"  " " : -
 d-

XN N
 D 
  D-
  &  .-
 D<+

"   ?+ S " - 5 


.  X" -
.  <

." 2<    

B  
 H  E+ !-
B. - " B& 
: X<+

J  3B' .  : Advance Organizer 


I;"  

&  H !- "Bruce Joyce & MarshaWeil""  


 & 
"

+ '    N X"B " 9  " "B B  

@ " J 


 B  Information Processing Models 

I  & I
+ 
& # J  B  
&  ".   5

:  !< N H :  X


< - 9
  35- X

." 9 - <  I & -


 J 

Advance Organizer Model " 8"  3B' . H e


.  
"
 
)
" 
Cognitive Teaching Strategies

"

 "
& " "B< ? H e
Concept Attainment Model
" B " !
9'
< H e
Inductive thinking Model
"

" KE9' ?
 H e
Training of Inquiry Model
" & D& " ! H e
Developmental Model
Xmemory I
   cognition -
  " 5 -
 ?+ 
" J ?&- .5 N ?+ &
 J E 
: : " &
 " +' " D& 
 &
 " +
Cognitive -
 &
'  Strategies Memory I
  &

-
 K
  &
'  strategies
Met cognitive Strategies
.-
 &
3 I
B <E  (C)  25

.
.  
)
"  L
 (Y) M E

U N'  J .- 


  Z ?3 N ?&  V .0

.   



 X'
]  ' E<  J   X
:

- -

:V  & " "E -

E  Z  

  U I  &   


   3 & J 5 " 

 X 3B' . " + - & 25    


. 

- 
I  V ".  X J     J @ !& I
 

 XS
 " H " + 3+    5- U .4

 N
] D&
< 9- -
  ?  9    

." E
< < T
J D

.-


J   J#
   X "   79 ' -
 " .;

- ' !&  + # " "


. - -
   

?3 U&  "9  ?


    -
 " 

J  B&  XB&


  XB+ X 
5  X-

< :" 

.&
  D + -
<  "
- 
 J

 -
   X=
'  N'  X <  I & -


: :  - 
 &
 " + .*

 "
- " -
 B "  .b .. "9  ?
   

KE9' 
 &
 e

Schema -
 J " + <
. D  3: I
  

7' 
 &
 e

.
B ?  retrieval \&
'  retention K9' 

  
 &
 e
"!3 
 U K ": X 9 - D
J  " J JG .>

Teacher's Role  

"  & + D ?&  X?]


  H 3 
 9 S

&
 +  D& 3+  "
  -   -
 J

-  7 " 2   I  6


 -
-  '


    @ -
    8 D-  X D


.    K   " 9 =  -


 D  D< 
G- XD

:B- !B H
+ J    J

"B h # <+ "< D "B- 7 -


 " .,
S
+ " 7<+ J D   X "< N - # 

J   XJ9 " &  D


+ .%
@   N
  J B 
  N'

  @
+ <. # - &  B&
 
.-
 &
' 


 + J I


# 
E B   " !   JG .

J   &    J "  !& 


 
    ! 

.
 - < B
 J -
  
 E+ -


. (chunking)


 X" ! "  "    "    -
 @
 .4

[  &
  expert
+ &
   -
 " .C

X J
 (s) X"   : (Y) Z Y=F(S,T,E) GE  =  

Z D
+ "
+ &

 7 J 7
 novice

.! J
   (E) X" J
 (T)

.K     9


:
.   

:
.   
 5E # < 


&
  D +  expert
+ Bnovice [    .)
.D - " J I
# "

: Personalization 
< (
.-
  ? 3 
#  I
 =  E9
:Participation 
 (?

 E
<  
 G " + J

 U < X  h<   K5- - I  


: J D .0
.& I
E  7#
7' "  5< X  "9    D& J I
9 D .4
.KE9' 

: Independence 39' (H
39' J E< -   E
<  @  J
:Investigation Z (
. 3  ?  J 3  J
:Differentiation  (Y

Cognitive Learning Environment 


.   

 
" J "  " ! + J -
 
 .)
 Z  ! 9 "  JG  X
+   J [  


!  
 D +  N3  
< 
< " I
 J


  " ! -


-   5 JG  X  =
'

.

.93  9 I
+  
 "
: 9 J

:
.  < B N"
 S(
YYYYYYYYYYYYY

S  X-
 E J I  " "E H   "" H 
:   5 -
  J "!9 "E  D- 6
<

 &  < K   "


&"  ? K  

 39

X9 K  XSG K  X ' ' e 5


K  X

S< 5

(3 E< - =  U&


) . K 

:&  


H  
   k
 !
 9- " "E  Z  

  
   B-  Instructional Design  "E

 D& D X = - I


' 
G J 
  - .-

-
  X 2E J



  &  H  "'

"  & '&


@   I
   X I
 

E +
E :  
E & H 6
<
J  < "     & H 6
< . &
+
. 7+
 

- :  
G   X= 7+  
<  J 
 B." 9 + Z   
T B&  .3 # =
"   J   V " J 
 B & ! ? 

3+  =  "  D L+
  D-   X D J  2E
. - 3  "  J 
 ! - .
< 
+  
# -  &
#   
: I
T  .5] #  X7# 
." "E J S

< 
Z 
 
9  + - f -
 < "   "]
 e
"  "E J N
:V "   ' X" 
. g
 J U


 
.'   Z 
9 <   - '
B.
  "' J &
+ = J 
    

" Z  - B 3G < internal mental processes D+ 9
. -



 &. 2" &.  S( (/) M E
(Tennyson,1992,37)

open ended learning experiences < " 


+ "  B- ! 

task "B   


S 
< 9- " "E   -

B  J  23 6 - =  X-


 U l 6 ?
9 B U

'  " X -



< J F e learner analysis "  analysis

   ! -5 9  .


  X 9   B

- "B  


 "  3- .5 GE  D' =  X 


B 
 " + D X ".
&   information processor

I
E .K 8 # 7 8   J 
 ?& =  X + I
E


.  B E' J @
+j :8   ." D 3+ 

 7 8  X 7#  -


   9- "E - 25


' 
.  Schema theory ' " 
. X-


  F    J "E    ." 7 


 X"B

I  !  X Hypermedia 9!< !  X Connectionism

=  D  ?& "     "E - X ' " B K- " #

. Multimedia

.-
 9 J L
 U

+  -  + H " + T -


  ' D   "]
J
 7+ U   X 
 "E E+  System Approach ".

 9  K
&'
 "- design models "E H  


-  "  Jonassen "&" 9  X ! L+ -  D

H N + Z learner anaylsis "  task analysis "B

 
 E 7- X-
 K  =  XD< D K  '!

representation :  coding


< : : "  
E

5  " " !  + & 5 V   9

?&  XI  &    =  B&


   +

:! " E N


 `"&" D #  


": XI
GE  + J B =  I
GE "B I
E - B +

Multiple representations to reality U#  I  3:


- 

=  9 J   9 S 



  N " + "

99 "B " 9 over simplification "3  !   ?&

. prior schema (satteler, 1990) 9 . J 


'

. contextual # authentic



: " -
   E' D J 
 7 
   

9 I  
 3 J 
'  '  #  " !
- 

(Bendar et al, in Anglin,1995)  - IK<

.pre-determined
.  @ J  -
 K "  V 
 " 


  N S S
<  6
 (;)  & 3+    .D< D-


Collaborative construction of -
 & K " 

- h< "  " "E - 5 N&3 3: G ".

social negotiation &' 6< 3+  =  knowledge

.! N&' N &  " "E

H'  T 
< B +  9   
Z
. V 

!  5 & 9- " "E  (;)  &

D&
< B  N I  & !  #   7 
.D#
 collaboration  =    

<  "B- 

H 9- " "E 

- D3 
 (-
   ) 5  !  
< d-   

5
+ D "E 
  + -
 . +

."  

! H 9- " "E 


+
] X

 "E 

pre- 9 I  &


+ " 5 "E 9- 
 "E 

5-  

"< + "  - "E +  Z determined outcomes

. XS
 X S5 +

U# # !  "    @


 B - !  .5 9 I 



.D  ' N
 " "   ?& "E  J T B- predictable

7 8 J K
 "

  "E  7 8 U

- 
 EE+ K
+ ?

K
+ J "E 
E9 '

"E 

EE+



   "'

  # . - " J V

9  7 B - X
< 
B

3+  "B<  7 B - XJ

.< I  

.J   #

.!

 !B "9 ?

(! )  "9 ?

@ - X  
<E
& 
: H D !  "E 
"9  X"  N   " "E N&   .<   content
self " #    "9 J -
 K  J 
pencil and paper tests "9  #
 
+ " + '  Xevaluation
3 E & S  mastery learning 93 "  E+
 '  G ". . - =  X< # =  # #
G # B
" K "  S ! open system h< ".

!
.  " "E 
 ()1)  25

!
.  " "E 
 ()1) 

 /IGH
 " !$ J& !$"+
:K;% !$"+

 " !$ :K;% & !$"+ !$"+


%&
$ 1c=  
< =, !"    oA4 % 1 =
01M" !
$   #O ;&  =,1 &
! 
 41 0I
F U 1 O M$  ++; . 
   U !) 1 =, #
1 ,      i  1
 "jU M$  % +; U  %1OA 
  
 E1
. rr+
 rrIrr ; % rr 
rr s 7rr  +rr&
$ % rr1rr s krr

  < +  E  + .
 % $
 SOU  ++;    
1j   0 1 =, 
k %
e &U   
 ++ 3E;  ! . aI Q 1  !
1 O +
  % $  active e 1 . +#O Q  U G
Q
 &  11OA 
 S  +E 3 L1OA ; 
 +; .
X I
1  
 SO O & 1 #O"M
 "H w aIO ,$ 
1 $  1v ,   i  #O

constructivisist learning environ ment ! $"+ :K;%


  "

; " I & : +k #O   i   K
s 7 S !;  % A  wO +b  e
k  
"L e     s S !;      H  A
%
;I    = + 1 i  #O   i  . U&e
O) +   +     ,   ;! !  es UM
. #O  H i O( ) ) "&4 GE
. U&e;"

:; :;I/ :K;( )  ) !L

QOW), resbek 7O   Q   #O KM 0


   H  +s   1 =, F & F UM % O
;! !  O   #O :
- U 1OA    , . 1
- 
  % H  3   +)  jO  
- U k
&  ;  ,   ; &
g  +
  + 3Es     .
-; =,  ;! ! +   .

+   !  )   e


   =, 1U&e ;! ! 
 i O e    % 7 1 =, F    A o Ae
 $ . # e     "e %)   ;! !   
, 0$I
;   % % .H$ e 
 " 1 i O 
F     "9& 1     #O   H$

 ; 1M  k  O  =,  #O;   :

U, UM %    !
g L % ,   c . 1 "H)

$ -
)   0L 3  1s .

1 "e
#O ", F1 O   &O4 M  
F
1


- &      !  3   .%

& 1 1X ,  


HU 7  %,

 -
 S  1+   i   3

I  e 44 .

 1+   i O 
F+ 1s.

   #OI  

-
! o  ! k   . %

-a
 O &s  %  3 % 1  + ,

 IMk  
O , s   I  1 .); 
1)s!  ! !  b 7 =,s   %
 + 7
  0  = Q; 1   1& % gardener 1I  

UM % 7  E.  , 0$


Multiple intelligence  E  + g;O :&  O
 , F
F - 
Ij1. feed back 0

 ;! SO ! 1E  % "& G    i  1


1 e 1 . c  
I+I
&e =, j  H

I  0 .
I  j verbal- linguistic . c

"e! =, & % % c j ! 3


 =,1O  j
%,< 
14  . 
19 I  % YI
   +

    , 0
  !1 & 
; O  &

& 1
 ) 
s %
; O )1
! . oH,   !
1v "b  S
1v %, )$  ; %
 9    % %  , 0I  j  : c1e
&  

& Y e %I   %I S


1v %,!1 KM 1e%,
S
1v   A 1v1 KA   
  w&s   Y eI
 % YI :
-,   1 * H  ! &  & .+
-) A )       es.  ,
- L   "  ;K
  1OM +    .
3 e -1 =,  1 1e
I  E
1! logical mathematical

YO1I   %I * 1 &  =


 O . E
1

  ,   H  ) A  & 11 .


& 
 %  , 0I I .

 YeI  % YI   "LU&e   


  , ;  
  w&s    I  % YI :
-
 oA  
! ) .  #O H A +
-
!   ! 1    %S  3 E
U    !,1M .
 
F  9
-
H   L  ! e &1 .   ,
-
e    ) .  , !
1  O
1

;K I  % YI


; O e s  U
1O  4s
  ! !
1
&1  !
1)   .  0
; ;K I   %I
 M  4s   ++$
; O 1v i)s"  + ` #
 0 O1  ;K I   %I
; "  3s 

  ;" U&e  ) 1O O)s !  .!


1v "b

I ,!
$ ) != musical rhythmic

"e! k =,js ;s   1+c ` # 


     I   %I .   I   &
Y % )L
 K   +i;
 =, j  1 j  H ,s .
 3
;K I   j  Y!
$  ) !  % 9K I  ) !
 : 31 j # 1  ) !  ; .


 I   %I A 
,    ) != !
$
  .  i 4 F 
  w&s   Y eI  % YI :
- "  
  s 3  %  A ) != ,,$ $
U "  
  3=  ) != " O #
e   9
M O M$ .

1 L  )+ ;Ks 9  %+     1*  


1H
 ! . %&s      QEI   %I 
 :
- "  
. =O H
- "  
 K ;
W   #
;
  H  1c 1 + 1M .
- "  
 K   H
 W M

- "  
;"   ) K A4s ; 

 A  j K... +.


- "  
 QH= K 
,  %%  F 
&  O

  H .
I ;1  bodily kinesthetic
! =,) A ! !  1   1L 
 .

 j Ks ) K  & ) aI+ O! (.

I   %I
; ! ,$ k 3#e e 
" Fj %,

- "  
 +e  ! )  ! QH ;
W
;

e ! .
  1s  ) A

+&  e  )+ O

F   # aI! "


;
! I  3! $

   F  es
  % 9s1s   
%
I

1Ms   aI+ Q+0!  ) !  .

I+  % YI :  & & 1 H  LO * 1

I 1* -1HO visual spatial

"e! K %
& =, A )$  !, "L  +U&e
 .  E
1;K I   %I
,1O  ) 1A Y# )1
   O   H  #1 .,$X 1s
; O

H
1& O  4s  +  !
1v "b   1c

 % .% E
1 %&s      QEI   %I :
- "  
A )  i 4  e . a0
-  h  
  E)   "9&  .
- "  


E 1  0 
!W 1M .
"  
 * a1   ) A +0   
.

=  H e  
.
 "9;  )1 

  /H3Dinterpersonal intelligence . $M


  + =, oAe  a1,e . KA1 I
 3
 %  , 0I
&   ! a  HAe! E
 a1,e = &
1Md 1    O  !" .
 3
;K I   %I &
 , E    L 
0
! `1 .
   !
1v "b;K I I    "9 ; 1e  )
% $"  1e,  
1e,  ! 1  a
 ,  , .
  )U, <  %;K I HAe
 M. 31

& Y e %I  % YI : S


1v %,
-) A )         j     .
"0 - 
        j     .
" - 
  1Md " F
   i 4 + )   
" - 
 +e oA4   0 + aI.  HAe
" - 
1 e   rE
& r  r r =r, r r,
;  .

 @intrapersonal intelligence O +P


  
%
I    Fr 
r1 , 0  r)$ &+ r
  3r "r,r  : "r9 ;r  3rr   %r r
 3r rKs
je$
 es .  , 0$   !
1v "b;K I I   $
e   i  ,   . % 9 I , 0$
 : 31  O   e 
 A Ir  r
%
I  v, + 14X 3) 1.

 YeI  % YI 1&


,     \4
&%
  I  % YI : S
1v %,
- "  
;  &1
    +"
.
- "  
% " S
   !, 
1M O
$ )
- "  
%;e L ;
 =, 1WX !9
&   a1 $ % ) .
)  
     H: #O
  A)      
&   +I  
!   1 =, F  O , ! a&     %, #O
)  
     % S  , EI )  SO 
  1 
g L 
<  H % ! i Ms  
  ;1H 

;   ; ) .1, &


7I  % w)  
 
   H =, #O;   :

& 
; %O  & +  E
 1U =, =
+ O Meaningful
3e +O ;
g L +U
 e , E KM  Q  , 1 Wk  + +)L
=, U   %&

  %
   ;
h+  9
U 1! %
9;O %,!$    ;  %, 
  aI  % % "b" I
"  % ,  H %
   1e   "M ,  "e
cs1 O  %&s .
*  %  "H;
U  `" aI1 =, i O e& )U
% $
I G  U =, b
1,  !9
  "M cs 9 j .  1
)  , E  %&
H  UK 0  % , E  )
 =, 1H ! $ French  1)  j "   = 1j0   1

+A
 +$ e   Us  ) =! r . r+ rKAIr
 1Y
 %1OM "
cs   19 K .
) %  %  i O  #O
   + %  , & " O) = 1
9 1 , gL %&
 HU d % =, 1Ms&   XO
 )
; 7I 3E)<  XO W +  aI&s  0
=, O .   3L ! e  %&
H eU M$
 XO % +0   
+! . HUM %  ,  XO aI7I

 ,   1 ; "
  3U ) +   !1
H! 
0 # + %
& 3  ))s  &  .
 ,: U
< 1H
) A oH   H % s  9
 11)$ %$O  #;1E
& %
 k  &O4
Q1 $  1
+UM % U =," 4  I  E
% $) ! H O ).  O
 O
%W %U  + %, + 1  
 %  
 3b  H   L 1

 c :#O
   74$ ! $    %  #O =  S O
) O ) F$  wO1e 1c    1  i
*      Ye aI1c 1e  o#HM
) aI i O   "L problem solving &e & 1 
Critical thinkingA )$  r1 Ye rr    r #rO
k
 ,  %1c 1e U  ;! S aIs : +
. authentic U
F
 U  ve "e    i O K    , 0$F ))  %  ) A  )s   A 1 ;   .  F
F! =, H  )$ ) 
1  . k  =,   1 L F   . studnt centered

Fr&1 r  r #O  r ri  !Or r;  r


  A O ).creativity  &$ flexibility 1= ,
collaborative rrr1 rrr rrr rrr  ,rrr rrr #O  rrr rrri  ,rr 0s rr " rr` rr construction Of knowledge ,
Social negotiation ( jonassen, 1994) .
: + %      O)s= ,  #O   i  j insufficient previous
!rr 1rrOA rr
 rr, *
experience
insufficient interest %  " O %  1 * $*
.   &   1 * $*
: +  % 1K % ,      i  ,
Qrrr < rrr rrr rrr+ rrr&  rrr
rrr  material  rr) rrr
S; 
worth knowing 1
 ! + 3 14O H "
Fj = h+
.content ! 
U  0L 
 1v ; %  S W  H$
. (Arnold, 1991)
,      
 tasks +  #! $ i O aI  
: +  % %

: ! $"+ :K;% Q/M


rr) %rr rr
 rr! rr #O  rr rri  o#rrHM %rr, rr
U
;
=, F 1  %    ; +   K  7 i O aI K
. rH! )$ r  1r &   ,r %r, U
rb  r ri  Fr 1 = r
F0 
: 
  o#HA aI 1
.   
    ; Y  e  
& 1rrr rrr
Irrr s multiple perspectives rrr  1rrr orrr;
 1E
. &  
  +   1 aI 3  
! g L j 
.    $      , #U 3 E , +    ,    ;& . "H" M
real r r U&re YO1r authentic r ! !L r ri  
r! .     +  SOv world
7r r 3r  multiple representations r  r  9 1  r.over-simplifacation U %, #F " 9  Y O 

. 1) , % 1=  , k . 


1  `" )  authentic tasks  Ks += ,  k  -


 !  ) 1L  #O ) 1L %  ( !) 0


 " N)

 " N)
JY F I
GYE K &8  " 9 B K &k 6
 ":   " 9 B
.8 
B J V U  . "< J 
 U I
GE
Y&
 B Y "  '    V

.?3 !  I


  J

.I

Y
 ?Y JY 8    8  J 8 
.
 ?

.#3+  ! +

kY
Y Y
Y]
- Y
Y Y
Y3
Y
Y K
 Y& UY 
Y<  3
.
    

1 IA
%   %  
what question
  i) +
 3e use their own mthods
+ 1v A )= , %   3e communication H$ discussion e  + aI , . k0 %    0 + .   extendable  U  (wheatly,.1991) + O %  = , "+
: 
 !  ) 1L "!   #O ) 1L
1  s = O
#O=  )   , 1 
 !$
 O .Ye
   1W i   O  #O 1& O =,
() GE  S  #O ) 1L )  ! 
 1L % 

."   "B    


.

Y
Y!3F Y
Y9
 Y
Y Y
Y
 UY Y< 9
  

.3   B 

.?3   ! +

Y
Y8 Y
Y Y
Y: Y
Y
 X?Y 
. B& 
 

.3 " @  9 E YB X  ?  K
^ B< 
.  
- B +'
E< 
 ?3 "9  Y Y5 +  ?3 "9 
. I
E - I 
B.

3Y+ Y
YB. X 
Y 
  - N3
 .3
."B#
 ?3 6
 3+

.
-  8 - ?3 

3+   8 - ?3 


.&

1L  o; % )    #O    +   :


@ :;T< : !$"+: V0
$
&      O    i ;&    I
   cI

&<  , =,  
X = ; . +
: ;WX).+;?;0  !$"+@ +% :

%b   #O Ye) A  1+  $   h


 1& O o : "9 )  ;E 
%b 7I ! K  H = "L
 &e
L;) :  YX  !$"+[: ;Z
 U & 1OM      1 Q . K
 % $ 7Is& =,U&e    Ls
 , E   ; = "9 U "& I
1e
+ I
  aI; 1 
 O
 +HA    1 !, 191W 7I
;1 K  c 19 "LU&e     % + 7    .
:  "% <DW "+ :;W  !;OD+"+: W
   %U 
  %
g L # 0U  +0 1c
    
OI

 " 1  %1  ,  a
%&
= L   %&s   
  bLU 3 w   +b
I
 ,   i1
 
&< .(slavin, 1991) + =,

 <M !;4+[: ;Z
U  
  %U  3E+

; %
&  !  K
 )   ) O
 ; o +!,  1 % 19 +,
&
  &4  , .  b


F U 
1 !   
 ) I  
)k (Martha stone,
   ,  1
 %$  + & ,
 +
 % K! +0  19+
.(dunlap,1995 grabingar&) understanding goals
&I
   1  %  #O 
1c=   S O %& 1=
) O  .  ! X $   1  
% F  
 `" & 1 #O  s I+  A    `" & 1 #O
 !$"+
     "e  #O" : %
 !$"+the active learner: ]3

!    ,  Ye  !
g L  e 1
% $O! )$   O S
1v %,
1  ! H 1 
 )$ !1  
O 1
  .
   "9
  Yes   1 Ye. ++

 !$"+@the social learner : O +P


X   #O #  1 K + +   , 0!
s g L &$  aI+ +  H 1
 & H %  , 0
; S
1v %, 3  W " O) =, %
1M9  , :
<  
 $

& U =,k , ;! S# 


U M  A  A 
,  0 k . ;! S# 
U M  A  A 
,  0 .
$ b
X 
<  = &
%! , 
U k ;! S# 
  "K  , S
1v %, +  !  , 0
 +  Ov .  , E   "9
  , 0$ 
 1 H ++ .  , 0
 !$"+ the creative learner : . +
X rrr1rrrE =rrr, rrr #O
& rrreUrrr
 rrr rrre Urrr

  e   & U . +k 1 "  #OU  r , r %  e


 rr$ "rr
rr0Urr rr,$ rre rr
1c  rr1rr  
rr A
OLH
  7$ e .
@0 8;%[ VP ^ & !$"+ $ :X=Y;: :
 "`    ))s  #O   YeW )

LHI   Ye , 0$ & $ . 3I  w


;$  YO1
$ U Ye  , 0$ & s

     < , * &


empty vessel M
 S; 
"  1   ; 1  
1=,  F
 ; : :
@ U&e 3 "
:   + S   +; . + 0&%
I 
$
&   1L   M  QI
   &
%
    A
" 1 9 0 =, $    %
 rr a,rr
rrIrr 1rre ! =rr, #rrkrr0 rre Interesting 1rr 9
activity  &e   7 &e    
 :
   %  XO ", %  O MU . testable !  0&    "  
 3O "M   +L
& % )$ e %  . +L  group effort , "   1c
%  =, +  + "H  + 0 L +O.  0
 :  ;WX   L     c  primary concepts   
 !  ;"   = F0
1 =, FF0 1
Individual parts $  1 =, FF0s % ; "
 , h
)   "9 misapplication S O aI;! S#=
$   F

  
j  ;!! 7 +&s

1
! : YX+0  1c  : %s 7 &   ideas#
e& Opinions& a1 & %, 1 9  . 1E ;
 1 1 & %, detailed knowledge H  % L  %
 & % 1 9  kcA 

+OvA %&
= L
  
 + %  . +  "9 aI s
&   +0
 %
0    b  !
 *1 %     %
+0 . ", &
 , =,
  3=     & e
  1 & %,  1 +E H . + H 1M
G
  %, 1 O  %. +
adapting & :  "% h+  vA 1E suppositions  . %
 %   0
1  Uv 1 & =,
    % aI1

  A  +!O .



&  "9I  Y A
 OvA +00 L   . % 0I
   I O
"0  = %   S
meaningful. +
  !:  <M   )  %  
< 1j teaching context
;! !  % ! 

& ,   ;
 %; 0
   !  + I  .

& I  !   1 
. +, U


&"  3 $ +
&  H ve
s 0 ;
%, g .

; :;P$ +
"O! $  O
 ;U = s   L !"
 3  #O &  0   I
& %  O &     0
  rr . rr rrL rr &1rr 9  1rr j1rrc ;
A rr) rr9 ) "#rr) rr
 &  0
;
 9   & ;
 %  ;! S  7! , ! =, % #   k
& 1 O) "# &   0;
%&
9  c    .&1c %
 % #O  A Q L  1 j$  ))s# 7I
)  !        3I   "
1 jS  =, a
1c    #O   .
& &  &  A )U O)  0 & ) iA )$

0
  %;! # &   0) % " ! O 
O +
 0   Lc      `   , G &   U  0
=, $+  
  7 )X
  cs   
     $ + % 1 j  s= = +  . =,s
 c ; = 0   % +
 <  %1OA     
S
 30 L  s
& I c * 01A 1 j  GK 1  
   
  GOH  1 %   );  ),1   =4U

"c 3E    


 % 19. 7

  A  &  1WX "&e  0   


, L & %
M )) 
 +OUK$    =    `S!;  +
 )$  % &  :  0

-
&    19) !.  U

-
&    
1 19 .
3 U  .

-
&    , 19

-
&    19. < vOb

-
&    19 , =,!"
  ! U
 " :$ 'B0 !$; .VB=) :  . a)( V0
  s % #O    jO   / 
< O +s 7
 S !;  % ces 0  "b 
<  % F
F "0   .!Ov
 +0 1ck aI  GU %b  1 &  + 1 =, F 
 rrrr 1 :  rrr))s encoding F 1 rrrr storage %
FrrrrA01 rrrr)$
retrieval
7I1 )$      41 aI   aI+ 11 )$  
   & 11 KA 1 7I  , H !
     motivational beliefs! K  )s.  ,  1
  "," aI   +b 3X
 wO   " +  0
4 K  .  "9 aI1
     0 vA  & 1
 cognitive  1 1 !  1 7I !  11

)  Es metacognition ( 1 ,=   -  , 0$ 0 


. Socio emotional %    L 3 %, +  % ,s  ;U
a+  ) .& "O % 1  aI+&s   L
e  % ! " H X   :

GOH   # s 7 =, 0$I X  
M ! $  % 
1c=   S O)  ) " O K =  +
 
< .
 ?  8 :O;Z+  + DO<0  % " J$O !$"% .XD+ ;: :
@ : 4-   G;)d+%) D+ J$O G-) ? 8 :O
   8 <4+  8 . I ( :
- k  =,  =, $  
< . teaching.
3 e - O     O .
- 1=   =, % +;K will*1 .purpose
- & 1  1c  =, .a process  ,
3 e -H! )$    .
 , - b  natural curiosity  O   .
- IM !    mental modelO ,$ .
 k  =,s performance  ! , +  .
-

 rr rr&$ % r rr U %rr, grr;O= rr Urr rr rO rr I
r+ ; r+L  r;
rW , rE  ir)$ rL1
%
I U g L
"rrL =rr, %
rr 1rr; OrrH
rr  rr+   irr +!rr, =rr, IrrMk

r 
7r r r U&re % r  re   19$ " U&e
.%
1M & 41 
 KA= & ,
r&
%r&
r  r0 r; Ur +  + H
= 
! 1
Ur 3 g ; +  K .O= , %
%  U +
=rrr, +rrr  + rrr = rrr
Irrr rrr %
rrr& rrrH! )$ grrr;O= rrr
.O
mg :g; [g/  raw data gH gW; DH+g<- g! g$" 
.:;$OI+ :;4-n;I 
r 0  O; r)$ 1r; :"r9 r   1rOA Ur r!
#rO
rrr  1rrr;  rrr1L rrrD rrr 1rrL rrr #  & rrr

Y1r r  r
 r U UA r) +r r
rW r1 *  ""
1rOA r k 
 1OA U 
! , . 0 1 c aI
r 1  "r ; = r, +re
r 1r G rE  +r r
W 
1 *
.     U&e  L %, g;O     GOH
 ! 


.cognitive theory  1


 1c O =, &$
.  1; H 3)  A )$ -
.O ,$  %  
!  1v IM -
wO +b 3 L  $= , %   3 e -
.  3
.      , -
. ! !L    %   h -
.  
;  ` I=   ,  k  -
.O ,$  %   attitudes beliefs  !IM -
+
 0 1 O + G %   1 i + -
authentic experience .  Ks 1OA= , &$ S ,

gg+ :gg; :hgg/% V0gg)  igg/0 gg+ jgg=  kgg"% lgg gg3 + :gg;WX
:(
initiative V0 autonomy !$"+  :;0 4- ! $" 
1rr& 1rr GOrrH
= rr  rr rrK  rr  r  %rr rr+ %rr *1rrO
r r
$ r ! O  r 1  $ rE1 $ %
r& =r,  e& 
.7! #, "9   c

+
rr rrb rrOO;  r4$ 7rr  Srr  irr) rrL1
Urr %rr rr
rrW Irr& .rrk Irr 1rr * 1rrM rrK" rr rr+  Qrr rr, rr  Qrr
1r &  r Ur Xr r0 rO M$ r1 1r0     ,)
.v " 3 S   A H 
E   <  

!ngg- ggL :ggI$+H ;! ggI $ !gg( 8ggO =ggo dgg<- gg! gg$" 
:!;I  a 8O $" %
r r& 1r, U % 
" O 
1c a &1  
%r 1r9 1r
r 1r& =r, Fr&1
r+$ 7r rKA r+#d =, 1;

.  1 & 
 +
  
7r 1r4O rH r& 1r, r, % r= r, rH
r 1rMd +0 %
:O
; ;H 0$  
 ; ;H 0$  U + e r1 aIr A 
g L " 1 " O %  w F  .aO $ I0" H YOE 
h+r r j %r r $ r gr L        0 Q " , ar&k  r;
#rO r %r& r r1
r 1rE I

.
 &k U G

:;&." B$o/ DH+<- :; ;$"+  ( :p;Z DO


"rr
k " rr ;  . 1rr& O
krrO
"rr;
r b
:"rr9 Cognitive terminology
r 1j r)$ r1 %
r& Ur %r r    e  1  XO 
.
0 +  &1j    H
rrrr; Dgggg VggggP0 = ggggo %?+gggg)@ j ggg<- gggg! gggg$" 
rr  rr! aIrr= rr $ . rr ; 1rr j" rr  r
    1 rr)$
= $  $ )
 E 
;   I + * U
, rE  e 
1
U $ h+ %  F0 %, =Ej 
1rrM$ Qrr %rr 3rr  rr Urr 1rrOM rr  rr %rr& 1rrM
 1   % <  ; aI  v E  L
Qr %r 1r+c =r  , rE  aIr= r, Fr 1  %  $ " !O 
.h A 1L : "9 1M$
rr+  3rr  =rr  rrc; rr rr rrc; 1rr& =rr, Frr1 rr! aIrr
r r   +1rOM! r +r  r Ur   L 
.1 9 1&
$ 
1W    "    
  3  +
 %& ; S
1 j L$ 3  +
 <   
# $< A H ) $ 
< , :U9 <

!  1v oA

%, O QW;  +
 b  4$ %, U X  L Q
QO +,F
=  O %, v & + 

 " !$ l?3-=o J$OB " V !(t"% l" k7


$ ; 1 j   !
1v   , 0$ " Kk g L

  1, K1 & a) 7I & %


1M$U

"  , " + =,


 =.
 cU   H  ! 

! 0 1 H ,
 
=,1)$  M h+& %I ,
$U 
0 + %
& =,
; o +!
.
 " !$ l?3-)<I+ =o1v S
1v %, L  i)$ open ended questions 
+ 3 e 7IU 1v =,
+b =, i)$ i)$ wO =
 +L1
 &
 L 
+  Q) i 0L  v

G
 1v K1 U +b =, i)$ . wO &1 
X
"0" 1 OM v ) e(   E    g;O
%
3
  !
W , !  U 1 =, i)$I   .1 OA
 " !$ j;u0 $o-@)%?+ [;=o$ : initial. responses
)  U $  E  %,   1b Q + )$ 9
  #+ )  +!  UM %   
G EU  &
%
   !
7I  !  .+#M

 3-  " !$ >=.M & V% tL0 D0 DL @&.+!(0u


[; 3e
W initial hypotheses :  e  .71

1
, 1+c 301
  1c  * K;   W % 
e
#O U   1OM    b  3 1+E
s  
$ 1 .e  +
W   I ) b  "&e
U O &  $
;   ;  UU
   A,s 
&  aI+&s =, ! S#!L +&%
 0   b  U 
&1 1 1Md  +0 1c.
  " !$ 'L% j <-+W wait time   ! 

  L1 i)s
 +k + O =,  
% +U %
I

O  31

+   U %
&  ks )$
, 0DO 
 %!
;OH 1   je
$ % 01
  1 &  + i)s 
 +L1  + 7 +#U
1)s )
 O "O  ,
&1   .+

;  U  Q c  s  aH!
,  A
 i) ++.

&1v   % i)s


 ,  % 1 jK  &  1X
, ! , 1
1s %&
7I v
 !1
1  #F0 
 G

1 e 1 . A

 /I<
).+;?;0 D0:;<-
. & 8 1$o0;:

:; . & 8 1$o0 :;<-D0 ;?;0.+)


 #O   U   
  1 )" H I  k )
:  )  ) 1L "M + O %&
=   
.&e L F1      1 ) .
Problem Centered Learning
.  .
The learning cycle
(ACM) #O  " " .
Appleton Constructivist Model
(Novak) "   " D  #O  .
Humanistic Constructivist Model
(Posner) "1) "  + 1 j   .
Conceptual Change Model
"O
 11" c % #O    .
Constructivist learning Model
      1 ) .
Cooperative Leaning Strategy
::$ 3  F n. + ! $"+ :;?;0.+) :@
Problem Centered Learning strategy
<
   + %  Ks % W; % #O   & 1 )$ aI 01 
"Grayson wheatly" 

 10"  +H I E


1
. E
1 
<  oA  % W;  #O 1K 1O % 1O 

 & aI1 )$   O, 1K, WUW % : %,+ tasks


 ,   cooperative groupse =, sharing
;  .() "&e % O

( . :!$"+
+ "9   ;   ))$ 1 L F &e  W %  I
  %   M$ %  aI+ S+  "O % .% 1sI


  1 aI+  % ,1e : ))s
.  %bU&e   +
. & ) g L % O &"    %O
 ; & $ g
  v1 !  1
. ; g  =, %A !1 &   +!
1v % 19
;" 0 % 19 .G ;K
aI  KA   &e S  +   :   H
 UO  %& Q  $   +1M  :"9 L0
1L  I
j A  7 1  1=  .7 +
1 M$  !j &e %b !
1v + 
+L ;" 0 L
G ;KI  + %   ) $) 1      1F
L .&e
.  3e  1v =, % % i)$ =   what
: "9 ifX 
;   Q1  1A  %&1
s E
 e  =, %) A ) +O  9;O 
g L KA 
& %
 , +    1 "  3 &e  b

 
<  aI+1 )$  
O  "
U&e   %b  task +  %

 1e 0  
 W  &e g; 7  L %, %  aI+% &e
UM  , 1 jK " aL =,
 A  e  , +b
   e   wO "K  .);  
  1  & =,
1 )$    :" H

 +    & S  + .; =, % FOA 3e  % K$v$
  
+ L1,$
 ) )( =,  =b &
v g;O +
 ,)  1 (  = & % + "  3 aI.&e
) % aI &e :
 +
. X =    
.  1H, =, "ee )$ ! 
.
 "9   !,   +  g;O
.  3e  =, % e; =   G + 0$
$ + L
. &   U extenfable  G   % 9;O
%
I
 k +
K  g;O 
$ 1 ,  K   + ; ! .+

 L1 )
0 i 
W % K  %, g;O.+ 0
. ?  :O "+::W
 =O aIO   1 )$    Cooperative learning ,I ) 
UM % " H  E1, 1, ) 1       !     %
 ,  b"  , % % W  % "
191 "  =, ,
 "; Y A &e II ;" UM % 7 O  E  , 0$ 

  1s
3s     + aI+ !Ov%, $F <    01 )$
e  "  ,  b,"

 UM % , 1 =, a"  1 * + 


$    1$
;& I
! 1& aI kM1& 7 ; ;K
w 0 ,
 L= ,  & 1   "k K  .
I 1
0 1  1 9  %s  
1 ,)  !
1O$ = 
X
           %  A 1  ) ;
.+, g
  :"  + +  K  learning task "  ,= M "L
+
!  X = &  & % g9 1 )$  .
. 3::

 "9I &  L11 M$ 1 % "L 


<  aI+1 )$  1
g L
 I U"  =, + L , "H  )$ = ) A 7  $ K
; .1c L   L$ U M  % , L  7;  )$
   e  $ K  %$     +   .& 7 7
 e  " % "& ++ S  =,;  )$  A
 K ;" U&e$ 7 .& aI e  + O  &1
  
)  +$$  UM %  1)  +$$!  explanations of their .
reasoning   :"  GH aI1 )$    
<   E
1
, H  )   !   :


DB D+.+)w% G- :;?;0 !$"+ . +F n  ::$ 3


  "9;  O M H aI1 )$   LkO  "#
< 
 E
1  
:
)  . aI1 )$   + w    ";  UU&e 
U&e  L 
+ 
&k +L % !
1v % 19
&  +."L % 19
;  .   , aI1 )$    E  % , 1 j:
. M$ + G ;H     S1e   ) + O
", .  + 3 %    +b 3wO
 .)  $ a S   #O   ) 1
I 1 +  i +   ,   SI 
1  .$ F+0$ $ ) e$ +  b
 
 . 1 Q& ) aI &
$ g ; e$  Q

1H, =, *E 
%b   . aI1 )$   &    KM !
I
 +A 
% =,

&    KM c !
  w S&s     , "O %
 &e !
       #O.1
GH $ . aI1 )$    
< "LU&e  
    ! 

! 0 $ LF  aI+U&e.

:;WX).+ :;?;0 Learning cycle !$"+


 aI1 )$    wO 01&$   #O 
1c0" , 1  " 0
   
<  . , H  ) =L" " %& Atkn "% "<"
karplus aI&s   H 3E  aI+ #O1 )$   , )1 * (
"<"  %
1Md M w + , 
U , ).(
  , 1 
<  aI+1 )$   UW S 1 "L))  :
L1 .e& )$
The exploration phase
L1 .$  
The conceptual invention phase
L1 .$  
The conceptual expansion phase
 
 aI+  H K1 %L ) "L

.(
:$F. -@)3 + .
O aI ",  L1 14O %  3L  A 
  = 1 9

 +$ 
+ , H + , 0$  !
W % UM % e$
1
  %, g;O  , 0 +$ aIW  , e& 
 g;O
 4  &1 %  "O % +
! 1H   aI =, L1  0
!   %W  aI+ + e$  =, + e K!    7e$

 "&e "M  !
  1 O . +

:$F. .@D%  I; .


  e 301 aI L1 L1$   =   %aI
;
L1
H =   O 1OA  U +; 
)   L1&e )$
 UM % 7  e+     ,
; Q14   .+ 0X  :
;  
& %  %
 K  +=   O 1OA  U +;   L1
e& )$    1b aI; = F
   14O % I+  +
) UM % 1e  +eUM % + L= &  )  
  = * 1H % 7  114O.
I+  aI + , S
L1

! L1 b +.
Concept introduction phase
:$F..@<0  I; :
 aI L1      +  + % O ! H
 UM %  = L1e& )$ $    Q ) 7I aIL1
 L1$   .
kI $ UM % 
!     %e

=, +  g ; + YA ! 1W    1OM +!  =,

0 .  F aI L1 
=  +    &
 SO  
 =, a 91M )  J <0 m a :$F. 1;o0 :$F. % t- (I
) Concept application phaseI = ;! ! e& )U  = 7IaI
 L1
L1 ) b

e& )$ Discovery phase % *1  


   +b
 bW  L1$   ,
&
!UM c aI
 !  L1     cLU )$  +& %, e  K  1
 +
;  =, j  +, aI H . %
I 1 1
=,
  0=     
 %O
Y1 "M)  %
 S O + L  7 .
M  &
O  %) 1X
g ; +    &  +E "
 +
    A +  =  .+ X  L1e& )$ UM % 
 % b
0 e 1OM =,   = ) e     1a! 0
F  1 = "K  1Md  = ;= I   = + , Sv
"  " 0) ", F$"
 UM % 7  , 
 ",  %,
3 +!
1v 7 e L1 = = "  ""9k4 % , L F$ aI
 3  =   Ov g;O 
0 
"H  + UM %
 #UF  e UM % 
!    % UM  L1$
  L =,   g;
F$ UM % 7  ,  1M 
" ".
Q ,  "9   "  , F   cI"    
"  % " 0  "     1WX  1 )  . "O %& & "
  !=  c  =  +O  1 % 
  %E 
  1UM % 7  ,   c 
!  +  UM %

)     e$ 1 e$ W  Ee& )$ L1  -


$   .W )    7 eH ! L1 1OM
1  ,  
0 1M    W&I O 
0 !L  %
 .

& % 1 %, 1 O "L    "&e   A "&e GE :

];oH0D+.+)w% G- :;?;0  ":!$


 % ,  0 A   1
 + 41 ,   Y A
<
 aI+1 )D      oA!   :
;
.     ) 
e    aUM % 7   ,E
+   , 0 (
;
.   + O 1   aI+1s  
H
.  U&e w   )     3O "&e
 (  = ) +e" 1 % L1 "L    E  7 1OM
! 1 !OL$     O "   % U 1
 1 9.
 &
. 1OM % 
! %&
 "& #  L ! W + H
O 1  ; & g  7 ,   e$; )  k
.%   O
. es Y A$   . ,
  IMk a  %
UM e  L1e& )$ ))  "K= * K + 1 !

UM %  .%   e E 
!  U, % ,   %
) )  ! %=  ,   ,   %L(
&%
$X+    % 
! aH   %
.

 ).  ]oH ( F).+ :;?;0 !$"+


I 1
0 1   
<  aI+1 )D  
  1 9 =, Y A 
 "O % !  
  wD4  
&  %41 )$  +
 , .Y A

&
% N h&  J F D  < ' .  
F - #  X!
&% 

-  3+  =  &
% NB < <  & +  9: #3 

E 
-  X
  X#  X?9  X7  2  !
.&
Y% NY B    = 
] J F X7 - #  X"

Y& .Y Y 


 " &
F  R
: 7+ ' =  

,  +b    $ L1 e YA


=  , 1 M
+ 14O ! O + %  " , 
  ;  1OA %
. 
"&e UM %   e Y A , +,O 0  A G E  %&

:; E 

J X"9  R  R


E " 9 " R5 &
% N  J F  D
X&
Y% =Y L!YE+ UY JY "9 R. J  B + 
.B  L!E+
&
Y%  - J F
 j  9
F 
.   : D
 
 &
@ Y  &'   X
 <  -
  :3: \ 8  X&
Y% =Y %
' 
. S

5 - =  .
.j  !  5-  # Z " 
 - B<.  
.&
% NB 
 < '
R : ?
5 
: 
 - " I
 " +' :
.!
B
  ?E  \   G
:7' 
 o
Z `R3:
- +   &  X& J F E< 3 "9
.
"  - < R
- &  "5
.

!$"+ :o3W;] oH0 oM () 


& !$"+ :;?;0.+) DH+) :;W  D  <+W {
G-D+
7 KM "   
<  #O L   1 )$ aI
e& )$ :U9" L1 S +
 Y A  %&
  , E 
"b %   1 )$ aI   .  $   $

1
1!  : WU9 1 $ &     L " #O

.< :Z  ?E  \    


9   ? .

Y X    = :   &  J \

B  B& 
   XI
! 2-  G  B 

Y XhY< X


 X?E     X\   

.9G I
!   

.I
GE

.
9 N ! - =3 g# .h
.&
# :   o
Y
 Y- "BY 3Y+     [  J F  E
:"B - # 3+  X7
.
 DG ". 9< XI9 G \   .

 U#  DG  K& .<  XK G ?E   .?


.(?E ) I
. N J .!
B
< \' 
 o

Y NT] \ !


B
&   &  J \ .
Y LY- "BY ? X
& D S !
B G J F
. R & G
P?
 " X
&  K&  <. - g# & 
- \  .?
 P   P?E   " X\   J G  S 
.=  "B
 F &% - "    6 "B

   X  =  !


B I
!  &   ? .H
X\
.RG \    2E Z h< X

Y
Y-
Y J (3
R : 9# )*) #  - E
-  .
": X !
B I
!  
 5-  X"B - &
  # \     F  < "B<V 
& "B 
.' " G J F
F 2E  J F " 9    B& 6 "B " 9 #"
."I
 I
E 2E   "  '   X=  "B

?Y XYE 9
 I
! E - &  2&   .Y
]

 "B (I
GE
 ) Z   .3 I
! 2- "B
-
 Z   .3 (3
R : 

) 
 I  B- I
!
.\    B& 
   ? XI
 
?YE Y   \       ? .

Y   ?& \ # ?E     F  .3


X(
Y
Y) B- !
B I
! ]

 9 "B .' "

   ? XI
  -
 Z   .3
.?E    B&

:(Novak) "Q." H &": S( := 


Humanistic Constructivist Model (HCM).
RY<# YE+ <YE S
 Z "  <E " S
 Z 79
JY ?Y
   - D X
 : 
9 - K 7# 5
  "Y HY
   J X" - 
& 
 Z  = 
.()A>4 X=-) "  # #   - heuristic #
" 
  - N
 &
J Joseph D.Novak "=-" E
" Purdue "
" & 9  ")A*, " Minnesota "" & 

Y JY Samuel Postlehwait "  E" U  Z )AA*


J 
 
  =- " #  X 
 +  
S Y  
N : ! V =- D     ."
Y bY

Yd " B U "B K   =!  " U<
 E
."B 9 -

Y: " Y
. DY

Y# - "
    Z  :3:  & 
?
  Z 8 N   Cogitive Assimilation 8 "-

"The Psychology of meaningful verbal J S .< " < ""
Y< " UY YE+ D K9 J F -5%  )A>4 " =   Xlearning"
"YB< "Y  " + D 
T 3+ =  David Ausubel " 
9 =-
5 =  J F 75 X)A>* "
 - Concept Learning
"

 "
&" B #  Z

"Y D
?& XCogitive learning -
 "  Jerome Bruner
Children's science learning ." <8
Ausebel " Y" Y
. J D- 
S "B% =  DBF 
 
."Y <- b
  I
E & %  9 @
+ 
. J
Learn how "  J ?  I   "=-" D F J
S 7 B 
Y! 2E "   "=-" N+ S 7# J  to learn
Y  XMeaning making J E ' 
& -  %
Y Y% !  ."& % " -
 K " 
. B& 
VY  

# + J F    R   
% 5-
. 
  B
:"=-" B #  % ! R& ()>)  25

Conceptual Change Model 


   :

: 5  E Z3: - &  - B


  "=-" BF 


Y- (Ponser et al.,1982 "


Y" D
#  B<
G H L+

.J \E "B J


-8 J F
. 

Y 7Y "Y- X


Y 3Y+  
E  " 
E 

. D- =
 J K  "  6
G 

Y &
YF " + " XJ 8 
 -
<    
E

Y  U < . - 


  J K - =
'  

:
  =  X: 
 - 2E
E " 9

. V  %

S X Y9 X25    &


E  J
< I
#  e)

RYF R YB& Y% ! "=-"


.  ! T
: B

Y  + I  &


-k assimilating D: =  XI !-

YY-
 & YYF UYY YY% "YY YY< "YY YY

.D I &

JY UYE Y J T


= T .(Novak.1987,1993a1993b)

Y-8  X Y &
E  accommodation K   9 e0

Y X Y  X"Y< ?Y  "=-"


 F meaning making

YE 3YF XY


<  - <  !9  

Y: - G J  S XS


 9 S
  : B #3

YE ? J  &


E # U-
 " 9
E   &

X"J UE"  - "=-"


. f # . "  ". < " 

." 9
E # L9  &
E # U-
  " 9

Ausubel assimilation theory . Y: - D


. " "  3+ 

YG Z Y% 
Y 
 " B<
G 
 
 &

Personal YE+ Y  D


. (Kelly, 1955) "" B&
:V 

: - :

(Kuhn, "  "  " <- - 5


<  Xconstruct theory

"Y  < D.  dissatisfaction " 5


"  .

"& Y' " Y-


 
. 
E   1962, Toulman, 1972

.B   I
.
< U
Y- D
U Z intelligibility D  &
E h5 .?
.(R+ D: S) 9 D 
ZY XDY D#
<   &
E plausibility  9 .H

Y-
 "Y Y- " 9  3
R 5- (Von glaserfeld, Vygoesky, 1989)
.(Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968, Carey, 1987)
#  D5
 "  U < X% !  "=-"
. 
 
 &
."! 
. B 
  5
-' " J 

.B " 9 "B< U "  35  - N


 D 

9  D T  
< D fruitfulness
E =  " @ & .
D 3+ 
 R
E Nilson (2001) "" " # # .<+

Conceptual Change Model 


   :

: 5  E Z3: - &  - B


  "=-" BF 


Y- (Ponser et al.,1982 "


Y" D
#  B<
G H L+

.J \E "B J


-8 J F
. 

Y 7Y "Y- X


Y 3Y+  
E  " 
E 

. D- =
 J K  "  6
G 

Y &
YF " + " XJ 8 
 -
<    
E

Y  U < . - 


  J K - =
'  

:
  =  X: 
 - 2E
E " 9

. V  %

S X Y9 X25    &


E  J
< I
#  e4

RYF R YB& Y% ! "=-"


.  ! T
: B

Y  + I  &


-k assimilating D: =  XI !-

YY-
 & YYF UYY YY% "YY YY< "YY YY

.D I &

JY UYE Y J T


= T .(Novak.1987,1993a1993b)

Y-8  X Y &
E  accommodation K   9 e;

Y X Y  X"Y< ?Y  "=-"


 F meaning making

YE 3YF XY


<  - <  !9  

Y: - G J  S XS


 9 S
  : B #3

YE ? J  &


E # U-
 " 9
E   &

X"J UE"  - "=-"


. f # . "  ". < " 

." 9
E # L9  &
E # U-
  " 9

Ausubel assimilation theory . Y: - D


. " "  3+ 

YG Z Y% 
Y 
 " B<
G 
 
 &

Personal YE+ Y  D


. (Kelly, 1955) "" B&
:V 

: - :

(Kuhn, "  "  " <- - 5


<  Xconstruct theory

"Y  < D.  dissatisfaction " 5


"  .

"& Y' " Y-


 
. 
E   1962, Toulman, 1972

.B   I
.
< U
Y- D
U Z intelligibility D  &
E h5 .Z
.(R+ D: S) 9 D 
ZY XDY D#
<   &
E plausibility  9 .H

Y-
 "Y Y- " 9  3
R 5- (Von glaserfeld, Vygoesky, 1989)
.(Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968, Carey, 1987)
#  D5
 "  U < X% !  "=-"
. 
 
 &
."! 
. B 
  5
-' " J 

.B " 9 "B< U "  35  - N


 D 

9  D T  
< D fruitfulness
E =  " @ & .
D 3+ 
 R
E Nilson (2001) "" " # # .<+

"&
 S"   &  S( := ""
Constructivist learning Model "Trowbridge and Bybee"
JY R! R
 R& "Trowbridge and Bybee" " H

"


2Y5 Y- 93  U 9  B 


  < 
.(),) "#


: - + 
 : "Five E.S" "E" 7
 !  + 
 
Engagement :QE  .%
U5  "B   9 Z ?3 " D&  
 N -
Y8 Y8 Y  =  X   9  
+   


Y = ."B& F "B I
:F J "   .\5  

Y  X!8 h
 :B \5 - 
 
 ?3  E I
:
Z    
# F .b F ...  7# : XI
: Z  " 9 X3
F 'F  J E   X N J  ' J F H d-  . '  ]
D 
Exploring LE"  .7
. Y 
 . U
  E
<  @  
 N -
 Y =  XI
.  E+ I
+  "Bd- 8 N U   
Y- " Y 
Y I
+ I #  "Bd-  
- . -  
DY&   ?3  J "
 ?E . E'  
 
.7'  
 D& 
    "B
<  "B

 N
) 
   
 *" F Z  H 5 (%,) E
"" " VH H
YB<
G Z % "
" B5
-  9 
8 
 :
XDY "Y9 " J G  5   ^ " 9 " B  X" 7#  R <E
.(Appelton, 1997) " B " D<  

Explanation 
" .6
.Y Y.
 J E R<E l . : <  X# ".
"9Y Y+ - 9 K5  " J L S "B< R  =   
.  & "B- I  & 
< J F N
   S T
Evaluation
 .3
"YB- "Y @ Y S J F   " E
< 2 XI
 E+  
Y Y
  
 S 3+ "9  "9 " + .\5 ? 
9Y Y# :L+Y  - R
:     8  .
XY&
 "! Y# 3Y+ Y " .3 X
"E  U5  
JY "!9 " & X
  X"B!  "9 3& X?3 39
" Y9 @ Y      
] X5 
 9   
Y  ?3Y  E' - I
 #      "  <
Z  " 9 @ & ?3 @ U #  .3 U XI
%  Kj 
Y# "YB 2  F   - 
 "B-  F X"  - "   X?3 " K
:%   9 "9  # ." ?
.
  R
T  # 
F
 .R
! R. !  & I
  D<E "9 J F
. F
J F &%  &F J F !8 S T Z X!B < B< " 
.  I  & !

#  - B
  I
& I
+ U5 - "   
 N -


YB. Y XY9 I
E - Z 8 ]E - G
- X 9
JY +V  d- & -   ."  
#8  E'
6
Y  X"YB< K Y :Y  J 6 "B5 " B "B9

Y-k YE G   .5


-'  X!8  X
-8  X.3
 \  ?& G  " .3 :3
R :- .I
& I
+ - I &
" 9  .I
. N
< (?& I#) 2E " " 9  X < 
   .?3  "  <  
 G  X2E
" +  .#   "<  "B<  " R
 N
 "
 Y  Y  E   V E 3&  X <  X
X
."  " 9 
  & S 
Elaboration 0" .+
9 "B 9 "<  B
   "< ?3 U Z
  K5  
 3
R :- ."B   #  "  J "BB #  XK5 N&
G  .
G ?3 .3 # X\
  K
B
- =    .   N&  .
G  
J F S T
K5 J E J
 
 
+

Cooperative Learning Strategy


X@ DB- I  & intrinsic motivation + ?  -  .0
.Z 
G  & 
I
&  H
+ + #3 
H
Y+ Y+ Y#3  X- ?& - Z 
G !9 & .4
 S
< K 8  &  R   & 
I
& 
."B
.<  R "B &   S
< K 8  .;
Reteaching 
Y

Y  I YF 9 J F "  \  S T .*
.6 "B5 J F & K5 V& Z `"  
:&   
#<

Y: DY&  XD  ! 


< @  "  e
academic  Y8 N&F J   7# - R & 
.achievement
#    59 Z 
< 
B "  e?
VY !Y S
U  < X"<  
   ?
 U#  - 
+ J K% <V   <  : -

.-
 ?
 -    Z F 
 
X I
+  5
 "
 I  J F "  \  S T eH

    :


GYE " D&
J -  S  ! < - " ? 9 F
 Y & J E  -  J "B: "B& 
  = 
Y 5- "B5 V
 "B+  J B- X!B &
 I
GE IV-
"Y  (Jonassen,1996) "&" @
 S
B '
R   .
+j 6
Knowledge Y-
 KY JY Y U&Y J I
9 : 
Y-
 K "   " !  XK9
: " 3 construction
" &
F  &  social negotiation &' 5< 3+ 
.! +  23
< I
 
>&    :& !" \5 #
Y N
 =  X " &
    "  ? & 
Y Y I
GE " &  " Z S 9 " ".   "
`I
Y:d
< "  .  I < JE# 9 6
G R 
.DE J 
:   D8
:&   L#<

-   D
F 3+  =  (self-esteem) D  "
 9 .
. " 7# - B I -% D  XI9 23  N 

.6 "B5  &% &'  J F

:&   


)
"? H
Positive interdependence : &)
: H  .%

:
  =  ` "  "  e

-8   '    X


 -
 I 9  F .)

DY-  DY&  " =


  3- X " ?#  

"Y" N YT   . <


+j
-  9 "< 

 
G  F "& &" 9 .& -  h& 


' X
Y+j UY D
& S E' F : 9  Wheatly

R 2

. 9 - & J < "B F 


- 9 J F S T

.we sink or swim together


Face-to-face interaction :E H .7
"Y 
< 9 XD -  -  U# 

d- !
< R9- X   @ " J  Z .0
 X"YB I
E -     " ! @ ?
."B#   I #3   99 3

"YB I  
B F XB < 3  XN
<
8

social and group Y&  &'  


B  .4

JY Y !


< D   X6 D5   J

communication skills YE' 


YB :B  skills

 "Y 
 D J " J F
. Z "&' 5< "


YB group management skills & I
F 
B

Y DY- Y "Y Y : E< &  X"

I Y
Y9 
Y
YB conflict resolution skills \
Y
YE =Y
Y-

.<  
+
 


.leadership

Social &' ! S


.  Vygotsky "&-" @


 J N V " -


3&" N T   XD< -
 "  J V

X  < 3+  Z    Z  "  Constructivism

.D<    Knower 7


  J D X"  'F   -


@ :  : J " " -9:  7!.  <.  
." 9 + S
< @ ::     . - &'
.6

Individual accountability :
 
"
.&   
.
:; ( F
 &   
.  
Focused listing :Z " U
"YB< 7
  7E &% " +   7E -  
 7Y
 - <  KF  J  Z ` =
 
Y- "! 9 N " +    F
& XK  7E
.<E #
Round table : N
" N U
 Y  TY Y&%  &'  
   " +
"Y# #
 &   X T " 9    .!8  &

Y& " 

 ": XU<
 E B 9 I   &F   ? TY   G .  # KB J  N
  D
I Y \5 B
" ": &%   I  
  
.

Three steps interview :52 
'I'   U
-  6
G  X6 "B5  7
 < N " +
- !# U5 (?) X() "  9 N  ."< J 7

 (?) Z   () B-  I  !8   K5

DY  - @# R
- "  &    " 6
] VY &  "  - DE  '
R ! "   V = 
YE RY9 R YB&  " D-  XR! R  "
.-
 7'
Social skills 
H)  ; .+
Y 6
YG X&' 
B 
 "9  " J ?&
decision

9 UE I 9 
B :
B N   
Y- 
E I
F trust building 9: K X E'  making
Y !Y YE<    

5 
B N  .&

 XK
j 
-8  D-  E- " Jonassen"@

."< # !8
group processing H) Z
;) H? .3
.B @ & '  = X &  K
&%  -8   J F & H
=  XB   7
w  # F XN

-  =
F  V ?&
 J XD& 5
] !  " - ."B   - 7 8 h5
&   U-  I# 6
]8 =  X 6
] 9 " B 3+
.D-  9 - R
: "

Cooperative learning models .&   S(


E  J 
- J F  "9
Student Team Achievement Division (STAD).
.& 
< S

Teams Game Tournaments (TGT)

 
< I  " 
<
Team assisted Individualization (TAI)
Learning Together Model (LTM)
R " H

.
.
.

Y ( ) X(H) Y UY (?) X()  9 ":   XU
.3 
  &
One minute interview :N 
M 
 U
:  !8 J    ? 
P" B  K8 "  o
PB "B<' 
 =  T "  o
P  D 7
  
 S  o

Learning Team Group Roles .  4


. H) <

& E9 H .

Y  "Y   X&


-
    - #  <  "

S
 H .

: 
 8 N : 

 S
 "
^" H .

XB F  B  & "  J .<  !  Leader 

: - : H N 6 6


 "

.
 &  & K5  E
< F  V R5 D

(STAD) :
 "< B H 4. B? 
 
" := <

NY&' Y- Y&


Y Y V  !  Monitor *M

Group Investigation Model (GIM)


Jigsaw I
Jigsaw I I

.S( (# V
H Z
C( " .%
Student Team Learning 
<  "   J H  
.R): .7

.  #  "  '  V =  X6


<
. E< "
B& &' 6
 "9 S  Reporter (

9 ) -
.&    !  Recorder :)"

X (* e;)  B 


-   X" 
- J F E< 3 "9 "
.&  9 I
9 - < 3  
< N 
e

Y Y X
+ "B " 9 
- 9
 "B  "   e
 U&
 X&% 
 '  H  - & K5 D 3+

.#  I
5 
  
I  " " 9
Y# D   D "  "  J X "  " e
. # " KB 'F JB

.
+j &F B
Y XY
Y+ 3Y+  &  
< &
 e
.\8 - B F "  
+'
.

 .6
Y HY D8 `: @ 5<    &
 H  
Y&
 Y- 
 V ": XE+ " 
9 R9 " 
<
.
+' J &%  
(GI) :&H) & S( := ''
.S( (# V
H Z
C( " .%
 Y J =  X"B<V   Z -  Z J "9
Y
 J F -5%  .B    - "
E \ 73+
.3  "B J
.S( (# R)? .7
."       + 5 E< 3
+ e
.3 (>e0)  & -  ". e

.
< 
+' J B- K 8  X
+  S T e
.
< &
 B X
-8 &
U& e
.

 .6
Y D  "]
J &  -  \ H  5
.+ H  D&  X " ? 
(IAI) : &"
 4
 NH"  
 :=
'
.S( (# V
H Z
C( " .%
"Y  Team Learning Y
< "Y  D - ?8  U&
.Individualized Instruction S
<
.R): .7
.(*e;) B  - X& J F  "9 " "9 e
-  U5 Diagnostic Test RE+ R
+ " " + e
.   
.
I  9F 6
G  8    "9 e

.R &  3
R E K  & "  &  
e

Y-
 &
Y' Y " . -  " + e
"Y &
YF : Metacognition strategies

X"  "   B5 - ?  + < " "9


.B E "    "9  "9

-


" +Y Y  X  "   B- "B "9  e

." -  
Y< Y. Y- Y 
Y-8 
     e

.R B  &  S


-
+

.&

 .6

h
Y U 3+  E+ E< +   " F e
. E< + the spirit of learning "

 X&  &   D- E< <. V H  
DY& 3Y+  +  IV-   X& S
- D- "9

YT talk in learning "B K: "B< 


  Z  e

.    

YE+ =   J Douglas Barnes " 3& " Z

NY
YE 6
Y  DY Y " 7  6
 

.tentative  ?3 U

Y

 I Y9  J F Z  # XB& B- &
%

dY- !
< R9- P"  D< " V- "   e

+ Y S
< + U X "  U
< K9  &

=
F Y-
Y<   Z Xh<
< "3  I  'T

Y "Y <- Active Learning  " - :  !

." J D  - &




Y XDY  9-  ! "  E+ X 


B.

Y
  8 "    " d- @
+ B&  e
:  3+   25 X!
< B

:&

. 5E (# ] '

 Constructive epistemology ! -


 5
-  e
I
YE B9 ' XD
+ J R  -
   
<

." B +   &


 I & e
I
 &
3 " " +   & 3  - 

focused strategies

.
+j  
  XR
 Invention

.& K5 6 e


8 " F 
  R5

R F D  & "  e

U "B< J Z X


+  D
  ". J
< D 3+
.I  
+ D  S "B< =   

S UE  E<    ' &


- =
 e

Y 3Y+ Y DY-



< K I F "  5

!Y
Y< R9- -
 - XB U  R+ D  

. - I
E  - " S  X
+j U &' 6<

.#

. "


Y-   9 - XJ E  "   e

Y- D& <  XJ  J F E - &
.99 " 3  &

Y ! E<  Catherine Twoney" 


:" 6
- e
.     ! " D- f S E<
- &' D< K: "   ! " . - e

7Y# R Y
 facilitator R
Y Y  " J e

JY S "Y JY F YE Y X&' 5< .

X"
Y- h
Y JY U& U&  R9   X

sense JY JY F Y5< "  meaningful learning

.=
 J E 6
G

learning for "YB< Y& Y "Y  making learning

DY GY   " 3+  "  = 


& e
Y YE+
<  "B- J "   8
" +' "B 
 B  X"B
#V E+ =  "B
.B  -

XB! - "
< K: J -
  "9   e

.understanding
:&
 B? (#  D 2
" & J F !
D-  V J  " F
S Y9
Y< D   `
  "<  - R
 V N
 - : '
R 9 J D ? X % 

.Cobb "?" Vygotsky "&-" N T  

"  &  XI &B ":  h& D9


  " -

&
   " &
  J F   L+

JY F
Y. S ! + 
< &
 &
F 

-
 9   " Z X! + 
< 5 

.J  Z D-


 
x  " - X"  D J "

.B! - 
 J F Knowledge transmission

" - ! +  5


: "   - B +   
! G S X&
- U& @ 5  7  &
."  D&   5
G  " U

0" 
&




99 "9
Authentic Assessment
@ I & -

 9 "B< " + ?8 " D J "9 7

.3 J K 5
 "
 "9 V   ."? 

   J T   
   F .?  K 
 -
 
 J F X 9  .3 # = 
 I  7 
XD -
:T  +    J " 9 + S
&  J T
 D &  B<. D< D-
 " K J T  ! J F
 S  I
E B& "  J V J5# # meaningful J
.99 "9 D
X  -   -   D 3 " 99 "9  LE+
+  BE   
 ?' - ?  B&" " 9 
8 

 9  .J 8 &
 "9 J  

#
S  American Association for advancement of science (AAAs)
 R!
J
 N
 "9 I
F B&   S
 h3Ea  
()AACX+ ) LE+ D& J " "E  - 


<G ' U  Dd- X  
 U& D-
V  !
<  
K 8 "9 < J F R5
  X NB S
9<  N
 "9
 

' " S  99 "9
E  


-  <E "  - "B 


:T   Ausubel " " @


J F ""9 7"   I  .5   =  !9'  #  

"Y "YE Y- Y X <  " D-


   E+ <E "9 


E  < B 9  8  &  R
E 8

E B& " S  X"B 


:T   7 8  G d- S 9

+ "K 8 "9 <"  'F .7.   6


]8 -
  5
 

e"BY I  ?3 .< ! . - Dd-  (Winn,1991) "


B    
9 - 
 : 
  J F R5

DY ."B<V "B-  "B]    R ] X"B E+ " &


E 
 9  .3 < N 6
]  X @ &' 

J F "' D& J  # ! N&' J F S 9 N&'   d-

< Z DF Z X


  3+ " ?3  # "B- J F

?  ". F .U&


  D 
: U&
 S
  99 "9

 d  2 D  .


+j J ' "  39' " 

.?3Y ?
  ?
9 ' B  X75  I9 ? & 9  -
 "9

7 d- R .9 7 8   -   "


 "9 "B 8

 ?3Y Y ?Y Y R


:- `K 8 J 
  R G- 99 "9 

.  I  I
- 3+ "  "9 6
' " + "9

Y99 "9   X!3 B &  9


  "B
B X"B-
 5


YE+ <E ! "  X <E "


  "  J < *)

JY F -Y5% Y XY - 9


 # I
F B      DB& 

X! +   +   R


:   "]
- ."9  "9 

.&B 3E

Y Y3- YB  XY 9 "9 ?  J F !& "B 'F " - D 


 6
<   =   X
 9 + & ".  J T ! -

 9 ! - .!


<  
 9 U J "9 ?  " +

Y F Y9
 "YB<  Y-
 KY Y ?3Y Y
 "Bd- "B.

Y Y& 3Y+  " 5  \5  U  ?  

S Y9 ". 6# d- ! ". U   .(Brooks,brooks,1995)

E+ =  X


\5 E+ "<  XU-   XE+  9'

:  9 -

I Y 
-   "Bd- ?3 K'TB 
 "   .B< -
 

g# 7 8  E9 N F Z  7 8  X E9 :'


R 

<  "B I & -


 "
 "B< J F B&
F 
  

. J 6
< '

#

.(Kenber & Murphy,1999)

"B&Y JY F R5
  "BK<  J F  H :&' K

UY  @ Y 2Y  X= &


 
+' J "9  9 :=
'

"Y: XI   K<  


B   =  Xh5 "B
 "B-  ]E

.(Jonassen,1991) 
+'  \

. &
G K
&F

Y  JY "Y H @ " "9 S 9 H R9- D 25 B
Y : Y:   "B  "E F XI9
E  E9

Y Y&
G 9  X"B  J F ?3 H :-' K

S Y9 "Y9  Y .= &


 "9  X 7 8   X"B

."  D F E  "9 < " J F  ] &  XI


 I


NY <E # X(Romiszowski, 1998)  7 8  E9 &



YE9 Y Z X E9 B& R9 I  
  BV 

X"Y  
  J F
  7 B S "9  F :0 K

.?3  8 - N


  " S 
 ?

JY R
"BY<V B]E #  !8 J &a =    


" Y 3Y ?3Y D&    "9 H -


< J F =  @  #

. 
 - "B E+ 3  59

Y . "B-


 "B
B  J F    "B-    X99 D 
K 8 3&Y  !Y9 "9 "B< 8 J F
 H  -
<

 Y .- I# B 9 S   ". KE9' F : 2 K

.99 "9
E V portfolio assessment

.S   : 
E< "9
-

 K.
"Y9 6
- J '
R  7
  
& 99 "9 23 J 7
 #

\Y Y R


Y I

5  ? ' 
E< "9 F : " K

."9 I  & K J F B   6


8   G E< +

. E< -  D "9      XL+


  
  "   ?3   U :0" K

I & eU   J    eI


 ?  " I & 
 : K

.D - 


.&  
& - "9 - X

:&


 L#<

 H


B J F -5% 
< 
B
+ J F 99 "9 7 B 

Y
   I  N
E  "3  =  D3  - "9 "
:B

Y 
+'
&   &' J ?  I
#  =  X8
I 
.R9    " 
+
+  99 "9 U  ? 
  & U
 "9 
. E<

?  f @  "9 =   P"9  "9  S "9 ? 


.B D9F  B D " 6
]8
."
T D9 " S N&'  K 8 
7  <E !8 : : XK 8 
:  8  
 
.
] U
 

.R5
: ?3 T
&  X25 
 J 99 "9  
U&Y JY F JY XI  % "8   99 "9 2
?3
."B<V "B 9  J

."B
 9 ?3  H
 .  K
&F 
2YE  5 !8 & "9 -
E D&  d- D
Y  j D&    .B < 9 !   ? 

 R
 D&  "9    7E% 9 ' D J F I
%
& 

X9  X
  X#  X.3  "9     U  @  " +

Y   D99  7E%  d-  J   X S


-
]

B +    8  
] 
+'  X?3  < X3& 

 "9 F D- 9 # < - X 


< R  R!3 "9

."B! 
 9 - ?3

Y Y B 


  !
I
 I

5 D9  ?& .&
: X"9
Y- ?3 I  7 B X"
& - LG "9 99 "9  .)
.99  D 3+  ?3
 ! "9 B- D X"

J #   "B - G ?3 & "9  d- 25   


+ J S  9 
+' 5 I
:  99 "9 F ."B  
#  B- D9    # - B<5 =  X BE B# &  XR
- B BB- ? J 
 .< <

. R
- 

!Y B E #   "B  3 "  99 "9 59 .0


.?3 9 I
6<  
 X?3     3
R  99 "9 ?
..  N - R < ?3  &'

N
 "   "9  - U5 XI
+  NT9 - "

Y  ?3  


9 ?& D J U&
  99 "9 .;

BY
  8 J Kj \3d 2  .K 8 &  -  "

Y
< 
< I
  59 & K 
 J 
  

."  "  3+ "B!

.?3 

Y ?Y   :Culminating Exhibitions BP; ^    .4

"Y Y9
 " 
 9
 -
G Z F 99 "9 59 .*

"Y  E< -  


B @  N  6
 

JY F 9  "
  J 5  I
E   X?3

Y  Y  D "


B.  B5
] XK9-
 &

"Y J "9   !  R


 R
# U5 X" 


DY  XY<+ 


'& ! D    XDB& 

.D  D9 3+  D<

.  
&
  !: + "
 :Concept Mapping
# 52 .;
Y 9
 B. " XL @  "<  8 I 

:&

 JI
B +Y Y B +  99 "9  K
&F   
:  Paulson & Paulson ()AA;X)AA))!
< J 


DY H
 
+ # - !
"B< U5 F XR
 3
R  +


Y# Y9 L+ :Performance Assessment R 
 .)

2Y5 Y 
Y& UY XJ 8  -  #8 "<

% "B5
 "B  -
 "B9 "B &F - 

.
<  !
"<  #3

.@G   I
E "BB&   3  - B +

R @ & 
: 99 "9 \   J K5 I
T 
  

Y- 
B   9 L+ :Writing Tests  2 .0


B -
 J I   !' @  S  X"K 8 "9 &"  '

"Y Y ?  =  XI  '& -


 @ # G

(Lawrenz,1991) D 75 9 DE#  J F -5%


<

Y"  
B  <+  " +    \5 
." 9 

9
 B- U& "9  " 3&  I
 :Portfolios R I)"
   (" B& X"B 9 X"BE X25  )    :

:   
& J 
 # XD ?& J F X" &
+

 @  J F K 8 & 
 X &

:&
 &# R

 I)" I2 

 L#< #<


6Y 7Y  Y' YB  X ? "9 6
]
G   .;

3Y+ Y " Y K<'  '


R   ?  "9  "  B .)

.S 
F   7 B X@
+  .<' " 
 X

.
+' &

UY YB S 6
Y '   6
]8  !
  # "9 .*
 Y' RY5 D  .E+ ?  7  J K "9 " .N
]

."B  "B U < J ?3 U& B .0


Y&
JY RY '  '
R    "9  B ?3 & .4

.' "     


 7  

."BE @ -
 
+'

SY  <  25  J S  ?& "9 7 .>
.?  
B   : J

@
Y+ B&  Kj  "  XB&  ?   "  E  I  .;
"Y ?3Y " Y9 Y Y- 
 - EE+  " 


Y+j
Y  < J F -5% X"9 H J F ?3 H .,
 "9 d- ?  #3 25 " F X"9 J =   

."B &F
.R   
 "9  "  .*

XNY&  7 Y  Y  ?3  + & 9-


 

"Y9 JY BV  ' "9 7  I  5


 +  'F

.5
-'  @
+ & "9 ?   

 XD-
 ?3   7E X?3 &
+ 7E 

#  J 
 
+'   ".      F

:
#' N U5 )AA) " "
 " "# # .D J I
9 "B

Y# 
Y 2E H    .(patton,1998) 

' 

.
+^ ?3 J F ?  "5  ' "B "B ?3 "9  .)

XR.
&
 
 " + X(Eisner) <
<  
  Z
."  9
 "B 6
<   X?3 D&
K 8 "9 3& 23

Y I <'    X


 ?  7  E<   ' "9 .0
."9 - <  & J B  F 
 7  I & 
: :  J B5
  ' 5  5   .4
.@   9  ": 5 @  D 7 B  "9  6
G

 J     J S 3&  K 8 "9 3& F 


.L+ I  <+    L+
"Y9 &Y- XB&  8 5-  I
- 3& N J 
K 8
.D 9  K 
 <


Y 
Y  X -
  "9 J F D9  
?Y& K 8 "9 3& <- X?3  "9 I 
 " + .*

.L+k 
<   - #3

  R5 ?&  ?3 -


 @ "9 < ' " J

"   - D + F &  D<. D + - \ 


 NB- E9 
. @  E+ &
' 6

  2E 9- .<+ 6


]8 '& J - I  
]

JY ?Y& ZY ?3 - 


U& =  X?3 " !

."  ?  K  "9   V K 8 "9 3& " +

YB&  "B ?&  XD&d # - R # R


< 
<  ?3

Y JY F 
 ?     "]
- 8 2   

9YE &
  D3 U& " J ?&   ."B&F 

Y Y JY <' " D 'F X"9 3& 3+  "9 <+

 Y9- Y  \
 &  " B& 
   5- = - "B 

: X"9  \  - B  

Y I
 D9  
    X"B9 9-  
+  9

."9 9   &


+   .)

Salvia & ) . Y% 


Y  Y< 
Y  YE+ "Y9

  "B<  <


  ?  9   &
+  - .0

(Ysseldyke.1998
U S B& 6
G " +  ?& "9 - XD&  "9  H .>
?3 K   9# 
& "9  ' ?& =  J XD
. 
   B  ?3 R-   ?&  9-

Y&  9 
9 R  :   I 9  = X"9 
.&% J F E
?Y Z  "9 - XR
.   <    "B " + .4
   :  =  #     3  ?3 

Types of Portfolios

   <

Y ?Y Y =  XB < 3  U#  - DB& 

:B (011) X  X ) I  R


E + "9  

?YV YB  


: "B
B "B-
  &   ?3

Showcase Portfolios

.

5
 "9 < .)
9!: "9 < .0

X@
+ B&  ?3  "  B&     U& .;

Evaluation Portfolios 
 9 "9 < .4

&  & K
^  & 5  ?& B9 "  &
+ -

 "9 < .;

.
-8  3
R 5- ?3

Documentation Portfolios
Process Portfolios


 "9 < .*

Composite Portfolios

 V;?-=o =?) 8 !;;40[


UM % 
  %)  1A 
  % 
$ g L  Gb 0

  % # 
& %U + !  $  % 7 1 +0U
 + % aI 
$ !   :
!
1v . !  UM % )U !  $   , % "b !  UM %
O M$ 
O M$   <& $"   U.
. I F   +  % 19O M$ 
 <& g L +1
I
IOU
U) . !  s Q0U
;  c    H 1EL 
 .+  1 =, +,) + ! H +  .
  .+ % : U  ))$ !  $    +
   c! I  =, !.
. w GE O "  )U !  $  + KA + !W %
 .+
.  + 
0   + U)  H !  $ g L 
 1 =,I  & %U  %  H  c  % "b1 s=
+ +
 Q   A  O + 
0  &."O % +
 %
.rre  rr , rrrr,  rr "rr1rr  rrK1 rr rr =rr,a
;! ! "   &
14 0 
;=r r+ 7Ir .r r  + , "H
U    & ) , !O  , +0  1 ;! !.

 c ." ; ,) a1 bU )   =, + g L oHA+


)" !  s ) !  "9 aIU  !+
 + L  UM %  ` #  A = 
   + !."O
K = .  , %, %,O M$   + +c
I    $ S
1v =, +E .oHA
.

 F
F+   HAe < !9 U

; % U  %!  , =, #   %U  L %


.
 %U  +b1Md  L % wO.
 +  
 U) %
& =,  !  $ O
.
A =  &
%&
oHA  ") %) A   %, g;O` 
   ;K!U   HAe.  `  KA

" "  + 301IO  !   


!
.
K  1U  ! + #`  + ."O
@=+M =?) 8;% !;;40@ @+M
U M$  U) % !  $ O M$ k ! 
Ur) GrH k
!  $ <r&, =r .rO M$  1r+c =rr$  r! r r; r
 "
! s ! =,   =,  ).

photographs K 
Computer print-outs  ;) F+0 % 01A 
drawings, diagrams & other artwork ; E  )
GE
%& %    1!
1M&" 4 = ,
; %&

+ $ !  U) % ))$ + g L GE&"  e 
+,O    ;  = 3 +    + 4 H "& U
1,e %, 1 O  U K1  portfolio paragraph  "= ,
1 O  w % b %&
 . 
+  %,
!  1 M  +
=,     ; , 0$ informal observation 1 cLU
.Uv 3    ,  +!
1 +0 e 
=o;;! 40 ?) +B DB- 8 8 
rr UrrM %rr rr, rr
$  r ! "rr) rr "Mrr
rr 1rr!
%rr, rr 
the rr #O 1rrc rr+0  t,[im collaborative perspective rr
r r0
r r
= r, + U 1 ! constructivists viewpoint
=r, rH Ir r +
1r IrM$
 7I a1
H =, a !+
 + !,
"r& rA" r" rM r  4 % b
1
U

% rb =r, rUv 3 re  , r) r 7r  1c +0   +
r
1L Ur =r   r  %r r!  r r r .r  "#$  4
:9 " O) =, M$ 7  19

:
 1 %&
  1Ms U M$ %  %
      1   O M$
1 % =   , " #$
! $ )" ! 
<&, =, $ U)   14O H$  , % ; O M$
   %  "K  F; ;
 % 
 1
 A , E  =, O M$ 1H ! 
 1
% +   ,  K   
!A $ )" ! 
! = )   E$   I  &
. ; +   3 "  + 1
;;! @40 ?) !; /0
 O" O !O H

 $ !  U) UM %  ! 
" I A ) +  H  I 1K, %b  S O 
 !  ) 1  1! 0 %
&  A ))  !  ) 
+ " I +b ) = " #$  Ov  ,  7I  01
. "#$ % " I" M )  
 ke 1
:  & 4$ % = , evidences "#$ aI" 9 
! %&

written material  &  


video tapes
  Y#14 
Audio Taps ,  Y#14


*1  ! % b   \4 %, % &) %
 H( 
&
 O I !
1 GE 1 a1 9    .7 
=, $
   O;! O 
 A  + Q4,
 H &I
&%
   % !  1  % b O O  AI e  ".
   $  % L " U)  + !  $ g L I "

1 =,U  U %&


$&O a)
  3$
 9;O
 1 + e
, , )U !  $  .+# KA 

   w % b 1M$   &  %, 0 , "&e
& O) G E   , 
% M 7  a   )  %E "M".

LU  < 1b  ; " =, "b,$ &w %b


 %
,$  = ; w =,M$  7 =   w  UM GE 
  .
& %
b"  w s  drafts =  GE
  & , 1  & 1 +  "  3  . +! O

 GH1OA  ) A )U !  $ "  % % ,U:


)? !;;40@ X " The working potfolio
O,   ") %, 
d &4 Oes
accordion style
folder
 
:
  % ! "+


  GEU    A 
& %  ! ")  +E$
 .permanent portfolio 1
  aI
 j )$ IM  +, U  +=  +  
.7

! U  !  "b +,
1 & "9   ! ")   b
$ .#
)? !;;40@ D! The permanent portfolio

Oe &4  SA 0I
Oe$
(walker & lamberdine
)  A & , 1994
;  & %d
 :

;  =, ;  !a

1 e $  3   M


 "  E     , SH
&  O) + , M
 E I 10$
 =, 1  , !  . #+
&  "H=   h# e1 
,  wLU :+ +
"O .O  , )U !  $ 
,  + 0 !  
;E   %, b  )U !  $  ;
  !
  ,  +  )$ !  ."  
7    3  eU
 E  "OO  ,$.

 "+
$   , " .
.

Process skill
inquiry
content

observation notes

Activities evaluations

 U  I
B "9
assessment
- "9
assessments
@ "9
assessments
E+ 39  .3
Interview notes
 .3 9

.)

.3   !


Observation notes
L< "! #
Check lists

+' &

Tests Scores
8 "9

.>

.0

1e 1  " e %


&  KA 4$ ;
 %&

." H" O %  0 
: 1
 WUW ,1 
  1  =" H 

.4
.;
.*

.,
.C
.A

  ?&   E< - K 8 ?


 .)1
Portfolios and class work grades
?3 K  "9 3& " +
: "9 5 
 J 
  R ] K 8 "9 " + F
.K 8 ' 
  ! .)
.B9 " 
 .0

)?= [DH+) .;-" () 



 !  $ !  U) 
1 UM % $ !  ,
+) & 1 % . !  & H %
&  7 
:   $ wO b  +  Ov   


.

 .4
.K 8 "9 3& "9 .;

  := ''

:R    
5 H 
" := <

=  .B!5 - ?3  "9 "  (criteria)   & 

?& S   g9  . 8 3+   9 


.    &


 & .B 3+  "9 "    &  S

5 -

 J ?& ' Z .(Dwyer,1993) K 8


 '  U5 D

."9    \ 

= U5 
 H
+  @
+ & S    &
=


R R " +  J  XI  L!E+  '  /  .)
.& E
" + focused / modified-focused / holistic D&/ /  .0

?3 E
< =
 "B ?&   J 
+^ K  # .

.(Winograd, Cater & Tierney; 1993 ) "B E+
 5 

 = U5  ! 9 ?3  " d- @


+
. B& -

!9  ?3 d-    X


 & U   "9  ? D-

.(Gitomer,1993)

.K k  9 J 


  D& J

J X
 = 

9 - 
 "
 
 # Kj 
: 

I 
 8 "
EF J  S  : Analystic  .4
.E+   
- B 
U  "9 J  S  modified analystic   .;

Kj =
 d- ? &  S - L9  ?3    D  "]

 "]
J  .7 8 

9 +  - R

5 R! 2E
D 'F B 73+'  K 8
 U5 N    &  6# I
:

J 
 = . &
J F E J F S T   &

.   ?&


 = :  J < &

.K 8 "9 & B5   8

:;

 *)
&  :=
'

: < 




YE9 Y  R ] I 


 - B9 ?& 
   ?&

.  -  E< - K   # e

Y5 Y . YB& =   - @  "B   ?3 B& "9 B

\5 25   I 
&  &  I
E   # e

Y = Y X 


. -   : I  &
 " +

.8 
."
  "
 !5 I
E : : -  e
 <E - R5 5 !B K 8 "9 3&  .3

U  . 


. D9 " S    =   - 3
Y
 7.  B9 ?&  I  8 
 " d."9  8 7 B 

   9  


< 7 ?3 "B-  <E
X3& NB

Y =Y Y DY  


3+  25  (Resse, 1999)

Y#  8  F  X3& N - N


G 5< S 

.Y Y "9  & =  @


+8 5 
+' " +'

&Y  "B 5  P ' "  5- "B- J "B  # B

"BY 7Y+ ?3 U& < E


<  "9
E U  

  <E . = - N


G 5< S  XD  

"9 d- &d .h&    - 


 .&  

YB- a point system 9 ". " + 3+  K 8 "9 3& "9

N
Y DY LY+ 7 B J I # R ? K 8 "9 3& 3+ 

XK 8 "Y9 & 5  \5  9   & J

UY ?Y  D "


 < D ?3 &F @  -
 DE

"Y9 YE
- "Y. =  J .!  J 9 N U& "

.B D3 
#

E
-   DB- @ ?  
# 25 I
E 5-V 

"Y9 3&Y Y 7 B  



 - ?3 =
d D E3+ 

Y- Y "Y Y I


E "
Kj    J !9

:J F S T =  d- XK 8

.? &

" U "B
  
"
 J "B  J ?3 .-
."B!  J  8 5-
+'
& - 
 Z  "  \ - ?3 =
 
"B    R9 5
:  K
j   #

:R

 I)"


<YE 99 "9 # E I
E J F E G !8   D& 
:E+ <E K 8 "9 3& 
 7 8 9 J 3
R - ?3 portfolio

K 8 3&   .)

D5<  
X U  - 3  -
 ? "B 
D& " =  K5 - XD  E+ D
# "B  "B<E
<   ":  D
# ?  '& ? J F ? 
.\ %    :%

P" B5
I    ?3   J =  3
R - ?3  @
:  .0
P ' " U#  "  - I
& 
D +Y  S  "9  R
G R K 8 "9 3&  #  .4
P  9 
+3 -5%

 - - "B
+ &  "Bd- X"B  ?3
  

?3Y " @
: K 8 "9 3&  &  9 3+ 

 & =   .E<    -


  "B  

Y ?3Y    - ."   J "< B  X < 

"9 3&

RB R! & DV


  XD L+ &  D!B 
+< 

  K 8 "9 3& " + "9 23 J I


: I
  .!
<

  "]
J   -
 U<   I "9 I   K 8

2
 V X"9 J F "E  
 J F 
.  R 9'

.   " B#

J F B9
I
< N B J9 + J F B E  J F I
<  
 S 

  E
<  K 8 "9 3&  7 8 I
 + F

.I  
: T 

.D J: I !< 9 Z K 8


D& 6 6
    X  @    B& 99   
: - &
E S  & N&'  ?E B& 9
  3+ 3 Z3: R  ] DB&  K 8 3& ". < "9  
.<+ &
.3&  E+ "9  ? # :'
R 
.
#8 -
 Z  "9  :R:
.?3 ?&   L9 :R : :
R B& ? B  3
R 5- #  R
 R =B  K 8 "9  8 b  X"9   =  J ?G  .(Reese,1999 ) R

3+ - &  &
KF   & = -

 U&
  &
. E
< "  =  J F -5% =  X!#

YV 
Y RB& N
 99 "9 23  D5
   L+
23 #
 R N

  3 X   
:

' 

   !"

 

 
!


   !"

 

 
!

< - Innovation  &  \ B J ! J F


.   & F

< "3  I  'T F !PB  'T I


:F =  " B- X%
.J & G
-  'T  R 
: ' S
< - Xh<
:3: J 
 7 
] X!  B
  I   'T : F
:'T
P-
 ? - R  & R
- !  #  : 8
P-
 ? - # E 
. !
  ::
PS

.  R R
- ! :  :Z :
:9 :3: 'T   9 3 
:  # " 9  -
P-
 ? - R  & R
- !  #  :'
R 

Y  Y& h
Y  &
- - I & @  "B#  6  DF
=Y RyY9- !P Y & 73] - " # ? D " X <   &
<   : 9
Y Y! &   & ' 
8  ! K d-  9
P  & 73] - " # ? e-
 ?


   !"

 

 
!

< - Innovation  &  \ B J ! J F


.   & F

< "3  I  'T F !PB  'T I


:F =  " B- X%
.J & G
-  'T  R 
: ' S
< - Xh<
:3: J 
 7 
] X!  B
  I   'T : F
:'T
P-
 ? - R  & R
- !  #  : 8
P-
 ? - # E 
. !
  ::
PS

.  R R
- ! :  :Z :
:9 :3: 'T   9 3 
:  # " 9  -
P-
 ? - R  & R
- !  #  :'
R 

Y  Y& h
Y  &
- - I & @  "B#  6  DF
=Y RyY9- !P Y & 73] - " # ? D " X <   &
<   : 9
Y Y! &   & ' 
8  ! K d-  9
P  & 73] - " # ? e-
 ?

PI  & ! &  


8 

: <    F T  !& 3+  D &%  7  

:  B5
- - : &  
8 5
 

>N
) 
  
)"  5 #U%

.D& 5
] I
  !  " *

- ! & ' 


 ? &
 ?    &% 

.99 B  


< D&    " 5-  B*

V  - ! 8 6
-' &
 & ' 
& B5
-

U & 6<  3+  D-



< K "  5*

 9 B9 ' D


+   D-
   
<  : !9 

.
+'

7< T
 U& Z D]E  # 6
-'  F & 
+j

-
 G5 U "  < Z   "   S
& 7 B *

 K - I
+
    -
 ?  - &  '

.
< I
+  


 99 F &


 S
 F S
+   &
 << B : 

& &
- < +  :  ' 5
-' D 3  & 7-

.D< % I
+ -  S  "  - '
+8  -

' 5
*7'  & =   -53 5  S  

UY 7 - : -


  <.  : !9 : 6
-' &


 - & 
 &
 ? 
 I  #3 B : 

6
Y-'  F & 9 & 99 7    
& ".

 9 S 7 "B< #3  + 6


-'  &  3

7Y Y I Y & Y


? B (
-  )
E  & + 

6
-3    (< ) &  &  :  
 

Y
.  F   =   Z  - <  
- B ( ' )

<3< 6 
&  &- &' 5< I
<   Z :

= Y   & &  


- 
  I
. ! & ' 
k

:D # S &  schmuck (1985) "=" 9 9- &




Y
8 N  F 
. F
]  & 73] -  #   F   '

 I 
+  "B ?&-  g  

 "

F  - h
  &
- :   <+
8 & #  I
.

Johnson & ) I
E  " H - I
< N &  
 +
.(Johnson,1985

 "
G  
   #   N 
] "B<< "
'

E+ -
 < KI 
& D  &- U
6
-3   

 E8  9 E+ 6  9 <


 ?  "B5
- 5+

  -
 " - 9 -
  S
 25   <

5 99 & ' DV B-    &   K&   "B

? " D '  D-


 ? -  ' "<
: 
 # 

. K 99 N& E+ T


   & B <

 D 
 S   ! - : 
:  
- 

 
 ?& 3 :- X"  -
 T

 F  9 = F

7#
3- ! &  
'  5    . #

:Reigeluth(1991)  - :  9 N

 & : - 5    


 B 
. - B 
.  5

6<  3+  E+ -


 K  S T   ' e
!P K 99 =
 "B-    J F &'
"# 7- 'F X - B  "    5 -
 & ' e
!P&'   " h
5 %
9<
  3 !    XB <
  & ' e

D-  
' -  &  & 9-  I
. B 
.   
' 
G "B< I
. 
 - 5< B :  !  
  7E' 
I
. N   
 B
<   B<
G  +
E 
.'  I
. =  
 
< 5- 
. B&  
.: ' T  &3 9 '

5# &
   3- XD =
 '   J  D W  J
' B < 5 !9 : 
] X - 73+ & 

>.  &. M 


 
 # :=
'

!PB] - g   

K  ]E  7-    E   S


9 K  # 

PS

.  
- !  :R : :

-
 ?  ! B& ' 5
-  :5
: I
E

9Y) !Y HY


Y Y :@
Y+ I
 T  ]E 

P <  B 99 

:  R9 ?
G  D P" - R R& (&   & '

Y "
Y. <   9  ! S
   B  

I
< 9 "B "]
X"B< J :  ! 
. D
 " T 

?Y Y 5


-'   -
 !  "B
  -
3& -

 T  :  @
 
] XB<  B K5 -

=  E    S =    ?& ' # E  =   -




   ! S


  


 . J KF  "B- - B +  XD
  - -
 

I
E T =  ]E  X!  
 'T @# 

 I 7#  - S D



 - B +  XD 

:@
+

  R5 J  


B  X-
  " +' 3+ = 

F PD& ! D   Z " - ! H J   

X 9  X7E  X.3 : : cognitive processes -




R!  ?& B X" 7  J 7


  ? F T   &%

5 X   #3 =


F XH'  XT  X E' 

 J F " 7 B : 9 " 7   ! ]E :- . T J

X?
&  X 
& E U5 X6
< ]E X
G

X &  X&'  X-


  X(% ) E+ ? & - 

.!
&% 7
   X
<

!    PE+ K ? & - !  B- .   X9+ 

.&B -
 \  ::  V

  R ] "B


V- X? & N   
 "B    "

:- : &B -


  \  :3: :

 :  D< h
 S T  XN  cognitive domain -
 ?&

declarative knowledge 

9 -
 o

B '
R T F P N  -
 ?& " - ! H J  F 

  figurative knowledge  -


  D 
# 

: ! Z3: J K5   K9 F ? F

 "D&" 
. - 8 "< #  B5 

." -
 7 8 :J 8  V

)11  G
9 K F :  # : knowing that " -
"

: - -
 " 7  Perkins (1991)."
" 

.(!)  &


retention -
  .<' ()

procedural knowledge !


&% -
 o

understanding -
 "B- (?)

operative knowledge ( < ) K


&% -
 D 
# 

.B
B -
  " +' (H)

  X!  "D&"  Z   B5   


 - -
 ".   ?E :3: 7 8 N   ?&

&
  < -
 : : knowledge how "7 -
"

+ J " I  ?& F X T  


]

.3
R :
9 K ]
o

J    : T J F  9 Z3: !    

contextual knowledge # -




J ?&  ? T &F F P-


 " - ! H

?& F X#  "  U


<

 #3   -
 

: 
+^  T

-
 5 B  PZ  J P
 Z   :! 

- ! H  3+  D99  S


< " 7  S :'
R 

 -  9  [   E+ (&  ) 9

H 7. 3+ ?3 @ D  -


 \  S :R: P "

 # &
 G   K V -
- X '&

P" - !

-    D U#  G5 # F (!)  &


!

! 
E  R#3 X E  - B
 !  # : F

.# -
  R : "
9

: DE!E+  
  K5 J H   #

:-
 "  !
E :: :  V

-
 " 7   - I
E  -
 " - ! H

T
  -
 "  !
E    ]


9  " +'  X-
 "B<   #3   D
B

h
 < # D &  T
 -
 "  <-

.-
 .<' #3   " 7 V

Y '  9 5 B &


 &   .T


!
&% -
  - I
E  X-
 " - ! H
.

9 -
  9 # -
 

+ - :  ?& 8 


 7   @
 F : "D& & "
D F E  \
& ' XI  & K  J 
# &

" 7   9 ' -


 " ! H    =  

  3
R 5- X< 
+ #3+ &
9 &8

":  X < < -


 \    ' X&
  J -


 9 ' X#  J I


9 B &  J F J 


U#  J .
  -
 " - I  N  D  ' ?&

.B " 9  

. Z " - ! 9   9  6 U   J F

R
<    Cunningham (1991) ""B&"Y : 

  - 
   D J -
 " - ! H

 ! 
. R 9 "
 @
 S "D&"  9 R  

S 5 H : D: 


 !   D  X6
8


+j U  "B  X-
   ?3 " 7

7#  2E ' X@
+ 7#  2E '   7#  6 2E


  N& perspectives
. B&   

.  Z B<.   d- ":  X@


+

X = N& E+ 7#  #  E "B ": 


< '  @
+8
. B& =
F U "B<V B5 
."B

:  T 
-  : D& J 

H  - 
V: R =   T B 9 [
9 U 9 j 

P! ' 

D  H  \   F X <E -


 " - !

.! B& 9 D& 


8 6
 " T  J &a 

P3 = - X < =    3   

. 9 


 D   R# ! 
 ? e

! H 3

?3  U ' X -


 RG5 ?3 J ! 6
 e

:  T 8 D& J 
 XB&    D- = ' 

.B 

P! " 

 B ?3 "B< ' # XI


  + ! 
   # e

=  - D ]


= =   X -
 J F S T  9 
 *

.  &

.! : I  &

 & J "9 !  (Michael Oloughlin,1998) @


 e
:B S

G 9  E
] B&  X: 5
-'

X<V J  H =   `J 9 -


] 
: *
.! 
 D T  

9 +  ?
  8 KF  : subjectivism   
9 U
<
.
: 7# 5 L!E+  X&' 
  "'

S T   " -  


  J F < " Z
 *
.-
  " +  5- "B- X  5- .< J F
 7
 
 9
 5-  J F Z8 
:
 *

-
    - 99
E  : Individualism 
< 
.&'  +
 ?
   B
: X
<

.B  7
  B
 X I
E B.
"B- J F S T ( "  J  ) " &'  *

Z  " ! I


. < "  
<  9 < ?] e
 -
< 'X @ J "   D#3 - "
<

.
.I
 I
E  U5 - " ! &

.B LE+  &' 


 F <
. Z X#  < 
<  R E Z   J '
U&  
< H B J K8
e


+E   
+E  X

+E  5
8 I
9  .4
.


 - <8 
  (Edward & Mercer,1987) @

9 - 
E " " 8 f
-
&  ! . - "
-

+^
 :- X7
 N " 2E -
 " ! H  6
<

?3
    B F E "  

9 - " X@ T 

  - ." h #  - 3


R : H  " +  -  

."B-
   E
] 
 !
9 ' "B!
^ 

S -
 "  X7
 N  " " D& S #  
S -

&<'
E D5
<  U =  J 7 ! " D

-  H  D&   3 6 ?&  F 

- 93  :  
 93    .8 J j D

: 
  X-
 "

. -

." "B - Cognitive complexity -
 9 :R:
5  R ] " - ! H R9 " "B    ]

?3   T  -


   e
." "B - cognitive complexity -
 9

."9  e

    E+ D9


  B  &%  B F J 

." - ! H &' 9  e

X \5 E 9: . -


 <+
<   ? 

." - ! H  6 9 e

]  5   -
 N ?G   R-
 I 9   dK5 hE D !
B B& "E - : " B   3
R :- .

: E<  K  F 3 N  "  -

<+  F H NB B d- <8 " 7


] - "3.    R-+ RK5

.?3   T  -


   :'
R 

I   <+ X  7 !5


B + "B<  . -
 

- ! H 7. !


    F 3   


E < !5 #  F !


B #  < X!
B


! -
 \  6 E+ -
    =  F X-
 "

.b F.... B&  + !


B


:8  R5 ?
5  H =  3+  B   ?E 

9
P "B<V  B   7 !  9 X7
 =
.! B 3E -  G   " .)
.
 D  )C4>/) 
 %  _ .0

F P  N J ?G   B- -


 " - ! H  -

Dd-  I
E .
]    <+ N " @  " F

:   B 6
 V  - 
  9  :

 !   6 =  ! R-


 I 9 B V
B 7

:  

:B  N
 & Z  

- 
<  3-X-
 9   9 &
  " "B  

F K E ' R ] B&  "E V+    3+   D

 
# Vygotsky "&-"
  J  S X 9 S 

 ?  F XE8 B 7   N  R  & R-  D< UE

S
< Zone of Proximal Development " S  "  
9  9

B ?
 
] 
 '' =  .B NB 9 ' 7# 

I
9  X
B  XI
   !    D  3+ 
< 

" 9  < ":  X" "B 


  6
G 9 - E

. 9   F E J B- N


-   U   
]  ' '

" 
<   
5   .Z - z:
8 2E 

cognitive -
 '9  J  "  X  : : 

"B  "    F #  Maimonides "  

  I&<
 J N  " B 9 -
  I
  scaffolds

-  9 DV X #


G "Bd-   '   XK { E

5 -
 9  '9 N 9 =  XD-
 J F J  7


X!
&%  X

9 ) <+ B ] -
   F : 7  <#

 X  3+   X" 3+  -
 N " 9 " ." "B 6 -

.3  "B  " ( # 

 Z = 
8 ?  -

E  = 
]  ? 3+ 

  I
E .  -

< @     25 =  

.  "B+ K:  # = 

.I  D-  3  " 9

 " GE I GE R5 ! " H J  :Z : 


< B  -
 "  5 F X
8  
 
< #

#3    <+ " 9 Z beyond the information given "I

 Y5X Y 3  "  J RG 


:V
:T B. 9


  GE  X=     ?3


 ": XR'  \5

E (experts K
+ "B  K'T)
: . -
  

  " GE I   E8 ! B  @


+ GE

Y.
Y] X Y# -
    
9 5- I
E 3 

<+   2 '   without information given "I

Y9 Y VY F Y9  .(novices !   "B  =! )

  3  "B


 # R 9 

 =
:  3
+   -


T -
 " 5 H  "  :"9 7    .)

"BY+ Y -
     +  9- "B X  25

=Y  Y Z XR< I  " 7  K5 - "9 "  J

.=  -

9 "B # 

 3
R :Y "Y  7 B  - ."9 7  " 7   

"9  :R: :

UY5   ' "9  J "!9 d- X"


 " "B< " 7


 F Z " - ! H D&    


   N 

7 Y    V 
] .7 B  9 @  D 9
:  '
R T

.&   << N


F
 "9   9  GE " 9 " H

GE U5 -  B&  6 - -  9 ' R9 "9

H  9 V GE N & H B B 6 
 #

Y

 "9 I
-  
 " X! H R9- "9  9

"Y9 Y Y9 '  YE8 !   N



&  ." -

"Y9 "Y# "  J  I


-  goal free evaluation E9

:-
 "   "9 R   +

Y 7 8 U ":  X K 8 9 E9   (3


R : " )

SY  criterion referenced evaluation = &


 "9 .)

Y: Y "Y9 dY- I


< NB R9 .B  "   U# 

K5 - " K  J " " D- XS


 8 9 J 

] .R   "9 @  7 8 N  " F 5

Y5 HY Y- ! \  X&%   @


] I
- BF Z I
< N   B
 = 6 : 

.D 7  -


 "

 ' B S XB99 BF    K


&F & ' F Xj J

 S  norm referenced evaluation = S


 "9 .0

.S

<   

XD
#  N
] K V " K  D- 
9 S S
 9 J

YT Y =B- X9 N  K


j - ?
5 : F :"   .0

.R  
 - S 9 " - ! \ 

Y !Y "Y 


 J -
 "   - "9 J


  8 - 
 
#   B& : 
 
 &

.  !
&% -
  ?& J 
E#  = . 

Y- Y  " B


] X! H R9 "9  K
&d 

Y- "9 "  G D J F 9 N -  B&'  :"9  .4

7
Y  Y  .-
 " "9 B   GE B 

."  '
R  R  "9 
 J B  "  

-   9 # 3+  


#'   B&' N 6 J

.;

:"9 


Y+'  X?3Y

9 X U
  X.3  @
+8 "9

X &  - 
 I   B& : :"9    !

.
]   "9  X5

I

Y5 @
  = XN  " J "9  !
E9  =B-

.
 &. & S(  &H)    E := 

"Y9 Y "9  @


  = XD  "9 - " =
 

X  X  XKj - 3


R : U& # @  
V: = : F

." "9 &


+  % @
  = X6 "B5

JY 8 Y&
  
 K'T F Z ." - ! H &' 

Y- "  ?& S 2E


  ! 6 @
 :"9
 .*

 ?& J F &  -9: Z


 9 -
 V   R

 Y " "B


] Xh& " "B   KB  "9 D!5

RY5 K'TY   X" - ! H  - D5   '





- 
:  F :D N T T h
  .R!
&F I
 N J


Y+ Y Y-  <
-  @  D < "9 R5  R
  


 "B  "B "  7


 7- X" B 
 - =
 #

 .R5 " ! H  - 


  XB "9 T <.

YB Y& S  "B  


-       ": P= 

YE Y-  B I


: J F H # " - ! H # d- ":

.!PI  J "B  "9 J F ! H B- XD 


+j  

Y 
] "9 ". X 
 X&
  X@ XR-  : 

RY#3 =  X5 
+' J F !  ' :D   "9 ? 

.R   ?E   #




   .B " J 5 99 & ' DV << "
E 

.  &. & S(  


   := "2

XBY
 5 -
  " -
 @  9 5 
+'

X  <! " E S


 & - Z    & S  " 

6Y 
Y] .!Y "Y   "9  5 
+3 -

Y] Y # "B 


 B
  I   ?8  &  9 

F ZY X

Y5 B @
 5 
+' I
-  J 6


Y Y- Y  X  &  "B B5


<  I  &
 8   T

JY
: "  ?
G  .
+' N B- " +  ?& "   =

Y " Y&  Y  YB Y



 8
  B  & \ '

"D&" B
#  % 9 ? "9 ?  5 V @
 B&

K'T  9 " - ! H #3  U# d- ":  .B


.! " <- U R


: J ?8   F X=  
 B Z  ":

 G B- .
 E< + D9 " 9 : S
8 X

D +Y S Y   9- ?8  J


E9 V S    ' 

P -
 "  ! H

?  U ?& J F R&

XY-
 ?Y' !B 
  : expertise stage
+ 
 eY&

dY- X-
 " ! H D&   3 
 5
  

Y# Y-
 D.  J expert
+ &
E #
<  B-

S
8 " - H  9  [
9
] # 
"T  R


I
YE 3Y   D F  9 
  
9 G I 9 E

7Y DY+  DY J+    X


] H  V  

G   I  & -
 D 
   X 9
]   IK< 


YB- X=Y "TY


 K
 7
&'  [
9
 79 ! .b


Y-
 ?' Z3: 
 6
d . 9 
 - "  
9

 Y DY F D G  G ' -


 " H  N
G H


-8 U D&! 5- 9 -
 " - ! H  "" @


JY F S

< &
J  e 8 :
 
 R& R& 

Y-
-8 ? ' D  X-
 ?   9 
 -  


  XB  I
: = 6 K
 X
 <  3  &F

HY RY9 "YB Y5< K'TY -


 ?   3B' 


N
Y+- XY-
 "  2E D - D5  :  .  ?E

JY F R ] & ' "B-


+ 
 -
-8  .-
 " 5

!Y H  J :N T T


:  .   5-   Z

+  S8 & ' F !  5 K  &  SV " 9

P    5- "

()A) Y 2Y5 .Y8 ". - instructional intervention 

Y -

< ? 
 6
   ? T  J &% F

:
E

HY ? 
 N S @
 David Jonassen "& < " B
#
DY 3Y+ Y
 Z3:

<  "&"25 Z X" !
: .-

Y '  
  : introductory stage  3B' 
 e
JY X" \5  &B # -
 eR ] B- " @
.J 8 
 - -
 D.  
Y-
 B-  @  
  : advanced stage  9 

YB Y#3   3Y   "B X" \5  .  9
.\5

! !  F XR<+


8 & 9-  I
. ! 
.  
]
. # 
-
E   & + :
d- X-
 - 
. !  E  : T  E - 
  ?& ' # E  -
 !  "B
 
 !
."B
    E  V  F X= 
  " ! d- XS

. 
< !  L+ -
  XB J F " 7 B  <+ E+ ? & L+ "B
 
" - ! H K =  
 XN  -
 ?& L+  R ]
:  J  S  -
 ?&
 -
  .<' - K  ?& =  E " 7    e
.B
B -
  " +'  -
 "B<
X!
&%  X

9 -
 - :  &B -
 \  e?
.# 
:-
 "  !
E eY&
U D
9  9- -
 " - ! H "   
:  - D R 5 R&
 S 5 H
.4

" @ .0

 7 8 .)

 &


"9 .>

"
  .*

"
 .;

" 7   9 ' -


 " ! H F J F E+ #

:
   X!8  R   9  T
  9 
P-
 ?  R  & R
- !  #  e
P-
 ? - # E 
. !
  e
P!
.  R  R
- ! :  e
B F 
. d- X! 
. J 7# 8 T  &% F

 -  & :  D J F E # d- X
-  I
.

' "Y:  < < -


 \    '  X&
  J -


 # V  - ! D


  - X-
 ?  !

.
  -
 " - I  D N    ?&

#  D


:- X-
 " - ! H  3 
:    
"B - -
 9 J F -5F ?3   -
  K E ! H  -  R
:  3
+     X"
  B  = J ?G  6 
# # .-
 " 9 S  - 
<  ' X-
 9  9 &
  " "B
" GE  J F -5F X-
 '9  J  "  U X

."I  
! 9 ' F X! H B&  
  "9   
9  : .= S
  X= &
 K  "9 
-  B I
: J F H I
  " - ! H &'
.  ?E  
  X 
E
S
8 D  9 - :- XH  D&   I
+8  
. E< + D9 - I
:
& :
SY

Y< Y&
d- X-
 " - ! H " +  
DY Y- DY5 I

5 J F -5% X9 3  &% 
.-
 "  2E

(A)
& 
S O 
" ; 
"M
" 9
! !;  
! !; ! 
aO 
e 1OA
O & 1
1 
1
j 1v
 !  L1

Adaptation
Application
Analysis
Approach
Assimilation
Authentic Learning
Authentic Assessment
Attention
Active experience
Acquired knowledge
Assumption
Alternative Framework
Advanced stage
(B)

 ) 
I g;O
 0   
  )

Behaviorism
Brain research
Biological acts
Behavioral objectives
(C)
Concepts
Concept map
Concrete concepts
Conceptual scheme
Credibility
Communicating
Cognitive domain
Comprehension
Controlling
Conditions

 
+ 
1M
) ;  
 + vD
 H
"K
1
+
&; 
1` / 14

(D)
K
  L % 

1O;  
F 
( 0  ,) !"  L1
14O  
1  
$  

   ,
( Fe = O)  
 <  
,
F$ , L
1E$ L

1
1!  1
e $ L1

Descriptive
Deterministic
Determinism
Discrimination
Developmental stages
Direct instruction
Demonstrator (teacher as a)
Discovery learning
Developmental Process
Darwinism
Developmental psychologist
Disequilibrium
Disturbance
Declarative Knowledge
Discovery stage
(E)


1 
 ! 
 ! i)s
+ e& ) L1
  ;)

19 / OHA i O
3 e 
 
< 
F 1 
<; O
1 

1 

1 E 


Experimenting
Evaluation
Essay type questions
Exploration
Educational computer
Enriched environment
Encouragement
Effective teaching
Encoding
Experimental world
Essentialism
Entities
Epistemic object
Equilibration

Criterion
Creativity
Cognitive structures
Cognitivism
Concept Formulation
Creative thinking
Critical thinking
Coach (teacher as a)
Cooperation
Cooperative learning
Computation theory
Cognitive terminology
Content
Contradictions
Constructive epistemology
Cognizing subject
Contextual
Cognitive organizer
Cognitive constraints
Conceptual system
Constructive process
Cognitive domain
Contextual knowledge
Criterion referenced tests
Cognitive complexity
Cognitive scaffolds
Cooperative group
Conceptual expansion
Conceptual invention
Concept application
Common sense

s  7;
D

1c= O
 1
 1c
+
,D 1 & 
!1 & 
 
 
   
 1O
 1c
 1; H
;
b 
 #O  0   $
,  1
  )
1 c
 1 jb
   c
 #  ,
1
   1
7;  01 O M
1 ! 
 1 U 
  ,
  
  
+ S O
, <L

 ,  !, #`
D < ,
 ,  

 E1 $  
vO )$ 1 $)

Higher mental functions


Humanist Psychology
High conceptual levels
Hypothetical realism
Hypothetico - deductive
(I)
Information and communication
technology
Inferring
Interpreting
Interpersonal
Induction
Inquiry
Improvement
Information Processing
Instruction
Interpersonal intelligence
Interpersonal intelligence
Intrinsic motivation
Instrumental thinking
Illusion
Instructional strategies
Initial responses
Instrumentalism
Invention
Intuitive knowledge
Individualized learning
Innovation
Instructional designer
Introductory stage

  0  &


$H$
% A
1  
A4s %  U
1! )$
H! )
% ;
  
<
 
HAe I
, 0$ I
 M  
 )  1 & 
M
 
    1 )$
 #O)  $
 #s
 
 ); 1
1 


  H
 !  L1

 i  jE
  Ks
   L1 !
1OM
1 OA L1
e& )$ L1

Encouragemental constraints
Essentialism
Empirical proposition
Experts
Expertise stage
Exploration Phase
(F)

iA )
 &4  
 #10D L1
 Uv
1
"&4  j K
   ,
  `   c
 &e 1
 #1 X

Falsification
Formal concepts
Formal operational stage
Fluency
Flexibility
Format
Fitness
Functioning schemes
Figurative knowledge
Focus question
(G)

  
0  e $
0  H! )$
   
 #!$  0   $
0   E1*  ,
 #eLs 1
1*s % 1;  !


Generalizations
Guided discovery
Guided inquiry
Generative learning
Genetic epistemology
Goal oriented process
Gut knowledge
Goal free evaluation
(H)

1
1 * K
 D
 1c
W"  ,

hypothesis
Hypothesizing
Humanism
Heredity

  )    1OM
  I
E
1 I
hb" ,
1v
 !,  ,
!
1   
1 
 & & 
(1 ) 1 1
% 
 I H
 !, 
= ,K
+ \vA %
& 
  #10D

Mediated learning experiences


Multiple intelligence
Mathematical intelligence
Maturation
Methods
Mental processes
Mechanical responder
Metacognition
Mechanists
Mental image
Mental acts
Meaning making
Misconception
Methodological side
(N)

 O b
  

 ) A  I U 
0 1
 #  
7; !
  

Natural curiosity
Neo-behaviorism
Non-achievers
Nave knowledge
Nave concepts
Norm referenced evaluation
(O)
Objectivity
Organization
Overview
Operational stage
Objectivitism
Overt behavior
Ontological reality
Operative knowledge

 , E 
 c
1 )
;   L1
(, E  I  ), E 
1c
( 0  s
 )0 ;! !
10D 1

(K)
1; I

Kinesthetic intelligence

1 !" O
1  O

 1 ,

Knowledge transmission
Knowledge construction
Knower
Knowledge claims
(L)

  
 
! I
j I
 !  , #`
! $ )$
 !  
    ) O
 1 
  0L
  
   , UM % O &
+= , #!;  
 M h1
  +
 !  O
1 
 O
1   E 

Learning how to learn


Learning cycle
Logical intelligence
Linguistic intelligence
Lower mental functions
Logical reasoning
Logical grouping
Learner constructed
Level of structure
Learning needs
Learner autonomy
Learning acquired
Logical determinism
Logical operations
Learning task
Logical Empiricism
Logical positivism
(M)
Measuring
Modeling
Meaningful learning


* K
"= " += , #! 

(P)

1 &
1 L$
U 

& 1 #O
3 
A  O
01 )$
F
F 
H  1 
A 3# 

Reflexes
Retention
Records
Radical constructivists
Reality
Raw data
Retrieval
Reinforcement
Rote learning
Raw fact
(S)

 )$ 1 9 %  O$


"
 , 0 U,
 1; ;  L1
I  c 
;
1I  FA
U&e  );
I 
 U    S
1
=  
*1 I
I
!D / aO $
, 0$ 
c  ,
,  0 A / K
= =b 
 #!  1

Stimulus response learning


Succession
Social interactions
Sensory-motor stage
Self-regulation
Simulation
Storage in memory
Sensitivity to problem
Self-learning
Student team teaching
Situated learning
Spatial intelligence
Styles of intelligence
Selective attention
Social negotiation
Structured world
Schemes
Sense making learning
Spontaneous knowledge

 / h# 
&e" L
+0  / 41
O
I
s
 #10D" O  L1
h1O  
1*
 
 O! 1
 s +
01O I
h1O 
U&e" L =, #! 
O! H 
+
  L$
 #10D 1

( HA4)  
+  0  & )
  ,

Products
Problem solving
Prescriptive
Principles
Personal world
Performance
Proportional stage
Programmed instruction
purpose
Processing required
Prior knowledge
Primary source
pragmatism
Programmed learning
Problem central learning
Pre-conception
Philosophy of understanding
probabilism
Procedural knowledge
Perspectives
Personal goals
Psychology of understanding
Processes of science
(R)

O! )$
) $
(" 9 ) 1
H
$ )$
1! +
vO ) 1 &

Receiving
Readiness
Representation
Reasoning
Reading skill
Deductive thinking

(T)
U
;
MU  !
    1
 SW

L1v
  H
 %!
  e
     1 
 I ;
 
   
 )  $    ;
1
    1c

Transformation
Testability
Teaching package
Trust worthy
Treatise
Teacher as a source
Teacher as a prompter
Teacher as a partner
Teacher as a facilitator
Teacher as a model
Teacher as a modifier
Teacher as a challenger
Theory of cognitive learning

lP. 

(V)

"&4 
1A <
    1 )
(V)
  ,

Viable
Vee mapping teaching
strategy
Value claims
(W)

 1I
c $ Q

Working memory
Wait time
(Z)
Zone of proximal
Development

(&  ) 1
! ! 

lP. 
:
  0) : <
K5 - "  -
 7E . ()AA)) . S <E "E  .>0
.8 
 
 
 .3% 8 L!E+
"9 . 9  
. :" "E " .()AA;) I
- .>4
.4)0 L 0,C L ;  .S
  < 9 
" 
. .()AC4) .
+^ 
 
 X ] " H
& .>;
 .-
 "   X XH&  J &
 .
9 

(,1)

 - I  & 9
 :" I
! .()AC0) .    .>*
>, L XI
 +  X 8  X:  " & ."
.,0 L
& 
. ! .()AA0) .  X    .>>
.7
 IV X 
' .S

Y .
Y# .
 . 
 - 99 "9 .()AAC) + 7 + .>
.)40 L ))C L .)0>
.,

J "!9 " 


. #  .(011)) .    .)4

<  :I
9 . -
 
. .()A>A) .  ?& 
.: 

 
 : +
T ." 
 J B  b
" 
  8 . 
 
E & X 
)   0A) X 
' e
#  X S
 9  &  
.;) Le) L (011) ]
.! T
: "B< " 
 .(0110) .    .);
.? "  X I
9

&
 . (& ' )  -
 
. .()AC>) . D3

.C
. &  :  .   
 H " + 

: .()ACC) . "
F    .A
"  &' "  "B- E J " I
 H
.I

] I   
.   
 ?3 @ & 

K ' 3& .(011))    X    .)*

. & . 


 

.!
<
.  99 "9 -      : "< !
+
00) : 9 T
S
 "9  ' : 8 

T

.#

:I
9 . << "& .()AA1) . <   .)1

e)C, L S
"9  3 9 
 .(011)
 0;
.0)CL
. :  .<<  & +  .()A,A) . S  
 .))
."9
:




 :6
. 
 <- .()AC;) .5
&  .)>
.U 

I
9 .   
.  D& & .()ACC) . J 9-
 .),
.7

:

?E - !  &


 - .()AAC) .    
.<+ " ?  @ K< 
@ 
  I9    
E
.);1 L C4 L U
 X 8 & X 
 &

J +  &
 U B: << .()A,A) . 
   .)C
.7

: I
9 .9-

.)A

X"D& &" 
. - : <  9  .()A,1) ."] 
::;P[ lP. :;WX
23. Abbott, J & Ray, T. (1999). Constructing knowledge ,
reconstruction. Educational leadership, 57 (3), November :
66-69.
24. Abdullah, M. (1998). Problem based learning in language
instruction: A constructivist model. ERIC clearing house on
Reading, English , and Communication Digest # 132.
25. Abraham, M. & J . (1986). The sequence of learning cycle
activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in
science Teaching , (23). 121-143.
26. Anderson, J.R. (1981). Cognitive psychology and its
Implications. San Francisco: free man.
27. Antonio, B. (1989). What constructivism and why are all
taking about it. ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED325 402.
28. Aleton, k. (1997). Analysis and description of students
learning during science classes using a constructivist based
model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 34 (3): 303
318.

)0* L X
 Z : & X   & .? j   &
.)C4L
J " I
! 9
 " +
: .()AC;) .g] J<E  .01
3 @  &'  J &  " - E
& X
  XI

]
&  
XS: 8 7E
.
:
 . 8 & X
 << I \ .()AC>) .I   .0)
.
 K% B
:
 . & &  -

 .()AC>) . 
 
 .00
.U 
  
 & T
 &
 . :  . < " +  .()AC1) .7  .  .04
.
 
&
:I
9 ." + ?& X
  X ? 

29. Atkin, J.M. & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery or Invention.


Science Teacher , 29 (5).
30. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational Psychology:
A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
31.

39. Carr, A., Jonassen, D, litzinger, M., & Marra, R.(1998). Good
ideas to foment educational revolution situated learning,
constructivism and feminist pedagogy. Educational
Technology, January- February, (5-15).
40. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Construct vistand
sociocultural perspectives at the annual meeting of the
American Educational Research Association. New Orleans,
LA.
41. Cotton & Cook. (1997). About cooperative learning. New
horizons for learning. Available at:
http:/www.newhorizons.org
42. Cottel & Nillis. (1998). Active and Cooperative Learning.
Center for the Enhancement of Teaching. University of
Northern Iowa.
43. Cunningham, D.J (1991). Assessing constructions and
constructing assessment: A dialogue, Educational
technology, 31(5):13-17.
44. Crowthenr, D. (1997). The constructivist zone. Electronic
Journal of science Education, 2(2).
45. Dijkstra, S.(1997). The integration of instructional systems
design models and constructivistic design principles.
Instructional Science, 25 (1-3).
46. Driver, R. & Bell, B. (1986). Student thinking and the
learning of science: A constructive view. School Science
Review, 67, 443-456.

Avery, p. (1999). Authentic assessment and instruction,


Social Education, 65 (6): 368-373
32. Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and
knowledge alternative perspectives for mathematics
education. In D. Groun and T.cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on
research on effective mathematics teaching. Reston, VA:
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
33. Bodner, G.M. (1986) Constructivism: A theory of
knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10). 873-878
34. Brooks, J& Brooks, M.(1995). Constructivist Classrooms.
Virginia, Alexandria.
35. Brooks, J& Brooks, M.(1993). In Search of Understanding:
The Case For Constructivist Classrooms. Virginia,
Association for Supervision and Curriculum development.
36. broody, C.M. (1995). "collaboration or cooperative learning ?
complimentary practices for instructional reforms,. The
Journal of staff, program & organization Development,
12(3),133-143.
37. bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds.
Cambridge, MA:Harvard University.
38. Caine, R.N & Caine, G.(1999). Theory and practice:
brain/mind learning principles. Available at:
htt:/www.cainelearning.com/theoryexpanded.html.

54. Garrison, Bently, M., larchelle;M.,M., & Desoutels , J.


(1999). Critical constructivism , science education, and
teacher epistemological development . Paper presented at the
science and culture conference . Unviversity op Pava.
55. Grsh. H. & Von glassersfold, E. (1978). Vico (1668 1744):
An early antipator of radical constructivism . The lrish
Journal of Psychology, 4 (1):22 32.
56. Gilbert, J.K. Osborn, R.J. (1986). Children's science and its
consequences for teaching: Science in schools, In:Brown et
al. (Eds.), open University Press. Milton Keynes,
Philadephia.
57. Gillies, R. (2000). Thw maintenance of cooperative and
helping behaviours in cooperative groups. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 70:79-111.
58. Goodman, N. (1984). Of Mind and Other Matters.
Carnbridge , MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Grant, W. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. ERIC
Digest, available at :
http://www.ericae.net/db/edo/ed3286/.html
60. Grurney , B. (1989). Constructivism and professional
development: A stereoscopic view. Paper presented at thw
Annual Meeting of the National Association for research in
Science Teaching .62 nd. San Francisco, CA, March 30
April, 1, ERIC Reporduction Service No. ED 305 259.
61. Hanley, s. (1994). Constructivism . College Park, University
of Maryland.
62.

47. Duffy, T.M. & Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Constructivism :new


implications for instructional technology? Educational
Technology, 31 (5). 7 12.
48. Edwards, P. (1976). The Encyclopedia of philosophy, Vol. 3.
New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc & The Free Press.
49. Ertmer, B.A., Newby , Tj . (1993). Behaviorism , cognitivism
: Comparing critical features from an instructional design
perspiring . Performance Improvement Quarterly , 6 (4), 50
70.
50. Elon, BS & Linn, M.C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An
examination of four research perspectives in science
education .Review of educational Research, 58 (3), 251
301.
51. Fogarty, R. (1999). A rchitects of the intellect . Educational
leadership, 57 (3), November: 76-78.
52. Fosnot, c. (1993). Learning of teach, teaching to learn: The
center for constructivist teaching / teacher preparation
project. Teaching Education, 5 .(2): 69-78.
53. Fourie, I. (1999). Using portfolio assessment in a module in
research information skills. Education for Information, 17;
333-352.

71. Karplus, R: et al. (1977). Science Teaching and the


Development of Reasoning. Berkely CA: University of
California.

Holmes, G & Leitzel (1993). Evaluating learning through a


constructivism Paradigm. Performance & Instruction,
September: 28-30.

72. Kagon, S. (2000). Cooperative Learning and Personality.


National Professional Resources. Inc.

63. Howick, W.H. (1980). Philosophies of Education. Danville,


IIIinois, The Interstate Printers & Publishers Inc.

73. Kerka, s. (1997). Constructivism, workplace learning, and


vocational education. ERIC Digest No. 181, available at:
http:www.ed.gov./databsses/ERIC-Digests/ed407573.html

64. Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1969). The Early Growth of Logic


in the Child . New york and London: Kogan Page.
65. International Dictionary of education . (1977). New york &
London: Kogan Page.
66. Jofili, z & Geraldo, A (1999). A course for critical
constructivism through action research : a case study
Rrombiology. Research in science & Technological
Education, 17 (1): 5-19.

74. Kitchener, R.E. (1987). Piaget theory of knowledge: genetic


Epistomoly and scientific reason. New Haven. C.T. Yale
University Press.
75. klein, E & Merritt, E. (1994). Environmental education. As a
model for constructivist teaching. Journal of Environmental,
25 (3): 14-21.
76. Kuhn, T.(1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77. Lakoof, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things:
What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
78. Lawson, E.A. (1982).The reality of general constructive
operations. Science education, 66 (2): 229 241.
79.Lucks, R. (2000). Constructivist teaching vs direct
instruction. University of Delaware, available at: http:
//www.utc.edu/EDU 390.99f
80.

67. Johnson, K.(2000). Constructive evaluation. The science


Teacher, 67 (2):38-41.
68. Johnson. D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1985). Cooperative learning
and adaptive education. In . M.C. Wang & H.J. Walberg
(Eds.) Adaptive instruction to individual differences .
Berkley, CA: McCuthchan.
69. Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Evaluating constructive learning
Educational Technology, 31(9): 28-33
70.Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism:
Do we need anew philosophy paradigm?. Educational
Technology, Research and Development of Reasoning. Berlely
CA: University of California.

89. Nelson, B.(1996). Cooperative learning. The Science


Teacher, 63 (5): 23-25.
90. Newmann, F & wehlage, G. (1993). Five standards of
authentic Instruction. Educational Leadership, April : (8-12)
91. Novak, J. (1987). Ed, Proceedings of the Second
International Seminar: Misconception and Educational
Stratiges in Science and Mathematics. (Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell
University) Vol (II).
92. Novak, J. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of
psychological phenomena in meaning making. International
Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6:167-193.
93. Novak, J.D. & Gowin, B. (1984). Learning How to Learn.
London: Cambridge University Press.
94. Novak, J.D. & Gowin, D.P. & Johansen. G.T. (1983). The
use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with
Junior high school students. Science education, 67 (5), 625635
95. Novodnorsky, I. (1997). Constructing a deeper
understanding. The Physics Teacher , 35: 242-245.
96. Oliver, k . (2000). Mthods for developing constructivist
learning on the web. Educational Technology, 40 (6),
November December 5-18
97.

Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional design & learning theory.


University of Saskatchewan, available at: http:
//www.usask.ca/educationcoursework/802 papers /mergel/
Brenda. Htm.
81. Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional design & Learning Theory.
Available at:
http:/www.usask.caleducation/coursework/802papers/merget/
bredahtm# the %20 Basics %20 of Behavioeism.
82. Milson, A& Brantley, s.(1991). Theme-based portfolio
assessment in social Education, vol 65 (6) : (374-376).
83. Molenda, M. (1991). Philosophical critique of the claims of
constructivism. Educational Technology, 31 (9): 44 48.
84. Moore, A. (2000). Teaching and learning. London :
Routledge, Falmer.
85. Morris, V.C. (1961). Philosophy and the American School.
Boston, Houghton Miffin Co.
86. Nilsen, B. (2001). Week by Week : Plans for Observing and
Recording Young Children (2nd ed.). Albany : NY: Delmar.
87. Narode, R.B. (1987). Constructivism in match and science
Education. ERIC Reproduction Service, ED 290616.
88. Ncconnell, D. (1992). Theory. Process and autcorne of
cooperative learning. Center of the Study of Networked
Learning. University of Sheffield, UK.

106. . Pines, & West, L.H. (1986). Conceptual understanding


and science learning: An interpretation of research with a
sources of knowledge framework. Science Education, 70 (5):
583-604.
107. Posner, G.J. & Hertzog, W.A. (1982). The clinical
interview and the measurement of conceptual change. Science
Education, 66 (2), 195-210.
108. Rath, W. (April, 1990). Collaboration and constructivism in
the science classroom> Paper presented at the Annual
Concention of the American. Educational Research Association.
Boston MA. ERIC Reproduction Service, ED318631.

O'oughlin , M. (1992) Rethinking science education: Beyond


piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of
teaching and learning. Journal of research in Science
Teaching , 29(8); 791-820.
98. Perkins, D.N. (1991). Technology Meets constructivism: Do
they Make a Marriage. Educational Technology. 31 (5). 18-23.
99. Perkins, D.N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the
learner ,Educational Technology. 31 (9). 19-21.
100. Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism .
Educational leadership, 57 (3): 6:11.

109. Reigeluth , C.M. (1991). Reflections on the implications of


constructivism for educational technology. Educational
Technology , 31 (9),34-37.

101.Petraglia, J. (1998). The real world on a short leash:the


(mis) alication of constructivism to the design of education
technology. ETR & D, 40 (3): 53-65.

110. Rieber, L.P. (1991). Computer-based microworlds A


bridge between constructivism and direct instruction . ERIC
Repreduction Service, ED 375007.

102. Piaget, J . (1961). Les mechanisms Perceptifs (The


mechanisms of perception). Paris: Presses Universitaires cited in
Anotonio, B. (1989). What constructivism and why all taking
about it. ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED325 402.

111. Robertson, A. (1994). Towad constructivist research in


environmental education, 25 (2): 21-31.
112. Savery , J. & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem based learning : An
instructional model and its constructivist Framework.
Educational Technology, 35(2):20-25.
113.

103. Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning . Hournal of


Research in Science Teaching, 2 (3):176-186.
104. Piaget, J. (1970). Science Education and the Psychology of
the child. New york: Orion Press.
105. Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand is to Invent: The future of
Education . New york, Grossman Publishersw.

120. Strommen, E. (1992). Constructivism, Thnology, and the


fture of Cassroom learning . Brucelincoln, College of Education.
121. Tenrsyon, R.F. (1992). An educational learning theory for
instructional design. Educational Thcnology, 32 (1):36 41.
122. Terwel, J. (1999). Constructivism and its implication for
curriculm theory and practice . Journal od curriculum Sudies. 31
(2): 195-199.
123. Teslow, J., Carlson, L., & Miller, R. (1994). Constructivism
in colorado: Alications of recent trends in cofnitive science.
Proceedings of the Annuel conference of the American society
for Engineering Education, 136-144. Paper presented June,
28,1994, Edmonton , Albetra, Canada.
124. Trowbridge, L.W., and bybee, R.W., (1990). Becoming a
secondary School Science Teacher. Merril Publishing
Company.
125. Tsai, c. (2000). Realtionships. Between student scientific
epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning
environments. Educational Research, 42(2): 193-205.
126. Von Glassrsfeld, E. (1983). An interpretation of piaget's
constructivism. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 36(4): 612635.

SEDL . (1996). The Practice Implications of Costructivism


SEDL etter, vol IX
(3).
114. SEDL. (1999). Is it constructivism. Southwest Educational
Development laboratory, available at:
http://www.sedl.org/pubs/sedlettervogon3/construct.html
115 . Schmuck, R. (1985). Learning to cooperate ,cooperating to
learn . Basic concepts . In R. Salvin ,S Sharan, S.Kagan, R.
Heetzlazdrowitz, C.Webb, & R.Schmuck (Ed.s)., Learning to
cooperate , Cooperating to learn, New York:Plenum Press. 1-4.
116.Schuman, L. (1996). What are the problems and strengths of
these theories ? available at
http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec540/presectives/problemsand
strngth.html
117. Smith, J. (1996) using portfolios for authentic assessments.
Available at :
http://www.int.gov/pubs/or/consumerguidesclassuse.html.
118. Sprague , D & Dede, c. (2000) if I teach this way, am I
doing my job? Constructivism in the classroom us and
Canafa, International society for Thnology in Education.
119. Staver , J. (1998). Constructivism: sound theory for
explicating the practice of science and science teaching . Journal
of research in science Teaching, 35 (5): 501-520.

127. Von Glassrsfeld , E. (1984). An interpretation to radical


constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (ed.), The Inventted Reality.
New York: W.W.Nortin.

137.
Wison, B., Teslow , J.& osman. Jouchoux, R. (1997).
The impact of Constructivism (and postmodernism) on ID
fundamentals . Denver , University of Colorado .
138.
Winn, W.D. (1991). The assumptions of
Constructivism and instructional Design. Educational
Technology, 31 (9). 38-40.
139.
Yackel, E:, Cobb, P., Whealey, G. (1990). The
importance of social interactions in children's Construction
of mathematical knowledge. In T.Coopy. (Ed.), 1990
yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
140.
Yaeusso, L. (1992). Constructivism vs. objectivism .
Performance & Instruction, 31 (4):7-9.

128. Von Glassrsfeld, E. (1987). Constructivism as a scientific


Method. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
129.
Von Glassrsfeld, E. (1989). An exposition of
constructivism: why some like it radical . ERIC
Reproduction service No.ED 309935.
130.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. E.
Hanfann and G. Vaker (Trans) Cambrifge, M.A:M.I.T.
Press
131.
Walker, G. (1998). Student assessment. Chattanooga
university of Tennessee. Available at:
http//www.utc.edu/utchome.html
132.
Waymen, M & pulliam, K. (1997). Constructivist
teaching . Available at :
http://www.athena.ivv.nasa.gov.project/teachercostruc.html
133.
Whealey, G.H. (1989). Instruction for the gifted:
Methods and materials. In . J. Felanusen, J. Van tasselbaska, and k.Seeley, (Eds.) Excellence in gifted Education.
Denver: love publishing Co.
134.
Whealey, G.H. (1989). Constructivism perspectives
on science and mathematics. Science Education , 75 (1): 921.
135.
Willis, J . (2000). A general set procedures for
Constructivist instrucational design: the new r2 d2 model.
Educational Thechnology, 40 (2): 5-20.

136.
Wilson, B. (1997). Reflection on Constructivism and
Instruction Design. University of Colorado.

You might also like