You are on page 1of 59

INDIAN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY: STRATEGIC OPTIONS AFTER 2005

A Project Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of award of MBA Degree

TABLE OF CONTENT
1. #. '. Executi e !ummar" $i!tor" of P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" in &ndia Major pla"er! Dome!tic trade (%e E)&M !cenario a. &mport! b. Export! Pricing R*D Patent * R * D +. ,lobal p%armaceutical indu!tr" Europe and generic! mar-et .. &PR Mi!conception and fact! M"t%! of /%ig% priced medicine after c%ange in patent law0 M"t% of /Damage to local indu!tr"0 1. Patent! and it! impact on p%armaceutical indu!tr" in &ndia and on it! con!umer! 2. Product patent Definition of patent ("pe! of patent! 3%at doe! patent! do 4 5riteria for patentabilit" ,eneral procedure! to obtain a patent 6. &PR in ,A(( 7. (%e propo!ed patent regime 18.Patent in &ndia 11.(R&P! * P%armaceutical 9 &mplication for &ndia 1#.:oo- at (R&PS agreement 1'.(R&PS p%armaceutical * &ndia 5on!e;uence of (R&PS 9 M"t%! * realit" &mpact of (R&PS on global bu!ine!! &mpact of (R&PS on &ndian firm!

1+.(R&PS 9 A ailabilit" * Price! of Drug! 1..5onclu!ion 11.Recommendation! 12.Porter fi e force model 16.Porter diamond model 17.PES( Anal"!i!

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
(%e P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" in &ndia i! t%e large!t in t%e de eloping world. &ndia produce! nearl" 6..< of t%e world0! drug re;uirement! in term! of olume and 1.. < in term! of alue= and ran-! among!t t%e top 1. drug manufacturing countrie! in t%e world. (%e p%armaceutical indu!tr" in &ndia meet! around 28< of t%e countr"0! demand for bul- drug!= drug intermediate!= p%armaceutical formulation!= c%emical!= tablet!= cap!ule!= oral! and injectable!. (%e p%arma indu!tr" in &ndia i! %ig%l" fragmented bot% in term! of number of manufacturer!= wit% o er #'=888 licen!ed unit! a! well a! t%e ariet" of product!. > er '.8 unit! in t%e organi?ed !ector and man" more in t%e unorgani?ed !ector. Bul- drug unit! concentrated around t%ree area!9 Bomba" @ An-le!%war= $"derabad @ 5%ennai= 5%andigar%. Furt%er= about '#< of t%e total export! are to 1# de eloped countrie! namel" ASA= 5anada= Mexico= ,erman"= AB= &tal"= Cet%erland!= France= Dapan Au!tralia= Bra?il and Argentina. &ndian export! are de!tined to more t%an #88 countrie! around t%e globe including %ig%l" regulated mar-et! of AS= Europe= Dapan and Au!tralia. Dome!tic pla"er! account for o er 28< mar-et !%are and t%e re!t i! accounted for b" MC5!. (%e leading dome!tic companie! are Dr. Redd"E! :aboratorie! FDR:G= Ranbax" :aboratorie! FR::G= Sun P%armaceutical!= 5ipla= :upin :aboratorie!= >rc%id 5%emical! and 3oc-%ardt w%ile t%e leading MC5! are ,laxo!mit%-line= Pfi?er= A enti! P%arma and Merc- &ndia. &f one con!ider! t%e entire %ealt%care !cenario= allopat% account! for .8< of t%e o erall &ndian mar-et= a"ur eda account! for '8< and !id%a= unani= %omeo and ot%er !"!tem! !%are t%e re!t. (%i! i! t%e rea!on w%" &ndia %a! low per capita expenditure i.e. onl" ' ASH= compared to +1# ASH of Dapan. (%e traditional &ndian !"!tem i! ba!ed on proce!! dri en. (%i! lead! to proce!! de elopment of bul- drug!.

3e %a e tried to anal"?e t%e &ndian P%arma &ndu!tr" b" appl"ing t%e !trategic model! li-e PES(= Porter fi e force! and Porter Diamond. (%e

major finding! of t%e application of model! are t%at t%ere i! a great amount of potential a ailable in P%arma &ndu!tr" in dome!tic a! well a! export mar-et. &n order to ac%ie e !uc% a %ig% growt% t%ere i! a need to ta-e initiati e! b" go ernment a! well a! compan" to o ercome it! wea-ne!!e! and concentrate on !trengt%! to trap upcoming opportunitie!. After #88.= patent act will be implemented. So= patented bul- drug! will not be allowed to produce. (%e &ndian companie! are good at proce!! de elopment but= due to product patent= t%e" will not be able to produce !ome of bul- drug!. Major c%allenge! in t%e P%arma &ndu!tr" are low price reali?ation= fragmented !mall pla"er!= dumping from !ome of countrie!= lac- of brand building exerci!e= low product de elopment focu!= etc. &ndia %a! alread" reali?ed t%e problem! in t%e P%arma &ndu!tr" and %ad ta-en t%e action in it! E)&M Polic" b" focu!ing more on export of bul- drug! b" de eloping Export >riented Anit! FE>AG in !elected area near b" &nternational airport!. &n t%e end= we %a e gi en !ome !ugge!tion! to impro e t%e current !ituation of P%arma &ndu!tr". >ne of t%e i!!ue! i! con!olidation of !mall firm! !o t%at t%e" can compete to t%e world le el. (o ta-e ad antage of c%eap labor= &ndian firm! !%ould emp%a!i?e on contract manufacturing. ,o ernment !%ould de elop t%e polic"= w%ic% boo!t! t%e new product de elopment. A! R*D i! crucial in upcoming future due to patent act= t%e role of go ernment will be er" important. :a!tl"= we %a e co ered !ome of t%e current i!!ue! related to t%e bul- drug indu!tr". Patent! pla" an important role in encouraging Re!earc% and De elopment. (%e new 3(> rule! impl" t%at &ndia will %a e to !witc% to a product patent regime po!t #88. from it! current proce!! patent regime. (%i! would alter t%e !cenario in t%e &ndian mar-et o er t%e next 18I1. "ear!. ,o ernment policie! will pla" an important role in defining t%e future of t%e P%armaceutical indu!tr". (%e product patent regime coming into effect from Danuar" #88. will lead to longIterm growt% for t%e future.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A.) St !" O#$%&t'(%): (%e !tud" of &ndian P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" (%e !tud" t%e impact of product patent regime on &ndian

P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" (o find out t%e !trategic option after #88. related to &ndian Patent Act B.G M%t*+!) +, D-t- C+..%&t'+/: J Secondar" data wa! collected from ariou! !ource! !uc% a! journal!= maga?ine!= web!ite!= boo-! J Primar" data wa! collected per!onall" t%roug% !tructured ;ue!tionnaire. 5.G L'0't-t'+/) : J (%e data i! collected t%roug% !econdar" !ource !o it ma" %appen t%at it doe! not matc% t%e actual data. J (%e data collected from t%e concerned per!on in t%e compan" i! onl" a! pro ided b" t%em.

HISTORY OF PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY


Antil about 1688= t%ere were few drug companie!. P%armaci!t! t%em!el e! made almo!t all t%e drug! t%e" !old. (%en two re olution!= one in drug! and t%e ot%er in indu!trial de elopment= ga e birt% to t%e modern drug indu!tr". (%e di!co er" of more and more drug! t%at re;uired !pecial training and e;uipment to produce made it increa!ingl" difficult for a p%armaci!t to prepare drug!. At t%e !ame time= t%e &ndu!trial Re olution in Europe led to t%e de elopment of manufacturing met%od! t%at could be u!ed to ma!!I produce drug!. A! a re!ult= man" drug companie! were e!tabli!%ed in Europe= and European companie! dominated t%e world drug mar-et for man" "ear!. (%e beginning of t%e Anited State! drug indu!tr" can be traced bac- to t%e Re olutionar" 3ar in America F122.I126'G. (%e c%ief p%armaci!t of t%e American arm"= Andrew 5raigie= !et up a laborator" in 5arli!le= Penn!"l ania= to !uppl" drug! to t%e militar". After t%e war= 5raigie opened %i! own laborator" and began a w%ole!ale drug bu!ine!!. Soon ot%er p%armaci!t! !et up drug companie!. (%e!e companie! grew a! t%e" adopted t%e ma!!Iproduction tec%ni;ue! de eloped in Europe. (%e American 5i il 3ar F1611I161.GIIli-e t%e American Re olutionII created a great demand for drug! and !o furt%ered t%e growt% of t%e A.S.

p%armaceutical indu!tr". But European companie! continued to dominate t%e world drug mar-et until 3orld 3ar & F171+I1716G. Before t%e war= t%e Anited State! imported mo!t of it! drug! from ,erman". But !uc% import! !topped w%en t%e Anited State! joined t%e war again!t ,erman" in 1712. (%e American p%armaceutical indu!tr" t%en expanded rapidl" to meet t%e countr"E! drug need!. (%e Anited State! !oon began to export drug! and became one of t%e worldE! leading producer!. (oda"= t%e Anited State! lead! all countrie! in drug production. Drug! toda" benefit u! tremendou!l". (%e" al!o pre!ent u! wit% !ome of our wor!t problem! and greate!t c%allenge!. Drug! %elp pre ent or control man" di!ea!e!. (%e" al!o relie e pain and ten!ion and %elp t%e bod" function properl". But mi!u!e of alco%ol= narcotic!= and ot%er drug! %a! led to addiction for million! of people. &n addition= wide!pread illegal u!e of drug! %a! become a major problem. (%e c%allenge! t%at drug! offer lie in t%e di!co er" of better medicine! for treating cancer= cardio a!cular di!ea!e!= A&DS= and ot%er crippling and deadl" di!order!. &n t%e 1768E! and 1778E!= p%armaceutical re!earc%er! increa!ed effort! to find !uc% drug!. Someda"= !cienti!t! ma" de elop drug! t%at lengt%en life b" !lowing t%e aging proce!!. (%e p%armaceutical indu!tr"= w%ic% i! centred around Kadodara FBarodaG= A%medabad= and Atul FKal!adG= produce! oneIt%ird of t%e national total.

PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IN INDIA


(%e &ndian P%armaceutical !ector %a! come a long wa"= being almo!t nonIexi!tent before 1728 to a prominent pro ider of %ealt%care product!= meeting almo!t 7.< of t%e countr"E! P%armaceutical! need!. (%e &ndian P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" toda" i! in t%e front ran- of &ndia0! !cienceIba!ed indu!trie! wit% wide ranging capabilitie! in t%e complex field of drug manufacture and tec%nolog". &t ran-! er" %ig% in t%e t%ird world= in term! of tec%nolog"= ;ualit" and range of medicine! manufactured. From !imple %eadac%e pill! to !op%i!ticated antibiotic! and complex cardiac compound!= almo!t e er" t"pe of medicine! i! now made in &ndia. (%e dome!tic P%armaceutical !ale! %a e increa!ed from R!+bn in 1728I21 to R!#1+bn in #88#= at a 5A,R of 1'.2< per annum. (%e total &ndian production con!titute! about 1.'< of t%e world mar-et in alue term! and= 6< in olume term!. (%e per capita con!umption of drug! in &ndia= !tand! at ASH'= i! among!t t%e lowe!t in t%e world= a! compared to DapanI ASH+1#= ,erman"I ASH### and ASAI ASH171. During 1728= t%e &ndian Patent! Act F&PAG and t%e Drug Price 5ontrol >rder FDP5>G were pa!!ed. Alt%oug%= t%e DP5> acted a! a buffer again!t P%armaceutical companie! b" ma-ing free pricing illegal= it fulfilled t%e goal of pro iding ;ualit" drug! to t%e public at rea!onable rate!. (%e introduction of t%e &PA w%ic% did not recogni?e product patent but onl" proce!! patent pro ided a major t%ru!t to t%e &ndian P%armaceutical! indu!tr" and t%e &ndian companie!= w%o t%roug% t%e proce!! of re er!eIengineering= began to produce bul- drug! and formulation! at lower co!t!. (%i! led to %ig% fragmentation in t%e &ndian P%armaceutical indu!tr" due to t%e emergence of a number of !mall

&ndian firm!. (%u!= t%ere are about #+=888 companie! big= medium and !mall fig%ting for a more t%an H AS . Billion mar-et. (%e &ndian P%armaceutical mar-et i! ran-ed about 1#t% worldwide. About '88 firm! in t%i! indu!tr" are in t%e organi?ed !ector= around 1.=888 being in t%e !mallI!cale !ector and t%e remaining being er" !mall wit%out an" economie! of !cale. &ndia manufacture! o er +88 bul- drug! and around 18=888 formulation! being di!tributed b" .= 88=888 c%emi!t! all o er t%e countr". (%e P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" i! pa!!ing t%roug% a wa e of con!olidation in &ndia. (%e objecti e i! to !trengt%en t%eir brand e;uit" and di!tribution reac%ing t%e &ndian mar-et= w%ic% i! e!!entiall" a brandedIgeneric! mar-et. (%e organi?ed !ector of t%e P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" %a! pla"ed a -e" role in promoting and !u!taining de elopment in t%i! ital field. &nternational companie! a!!ociated wit% t%i! !ector %a e !timulated= a!!i!ted and !pear%eaded t%i! d"namic de elopment in t%e pa!t fift"It%ree "ear! and %elped to put &ndia on t%e P%armaceutical map of t%e world. (%e P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" in &ndia pro ide! excellent facilitie!. &t %a! ;ualit" producer! and man" unit! are appro ed b" regulator" aut%oritie! in ASA and AB. &t %a! a pool of per!onnel wit% %ig% managerial and tec%nical competence a! al!o !-illed wor-force. &t! trac- record of de elopment= particularl" in t%e area of impro ed co!tIbeneficial c%emical !"nt%e!i! for ariou! drug molecule! i! excellent. &t pro ide! a wide ariet" of bul- drug! and export! !op%i!ticated bul- drug!. &n t%e pre!ent !cenario= t%e growt% of a dome!tic P%armaceutical compan" i! criticall" dependent on it! t%erapeutic pre!ence. (%e old and mature categorie! li-e antiIinfecti e!= itamin!= analge!ic! are deIgrowing w%ileL new life!t"le categorie! li-e 5ardio a!cular= 5entral Cer ou! S"!tem F5CSG= Anti Diabetic are expanding at doubleIdigit growt% rate!. (%e &ndian mar-et %a! !ome uni;ue -!(-/t-1%). &ndia %a! a .' "ear old democrac". &t %a! an educated wor- force and Engli!% i! commonl" u!ed. &t %a! a !olid legal framewor- and !trong financial mar-et!. Profe!!ional !er ice! are ea!il" a ailable. (%ere i! alread" an e!tabli!%ed international indu!tr" and bu!ine!! communit". &t %a! a good networ- of worldIcla!! educational in!titution! and e!tabli!%ed !trengt%! in &nformation (ec%nolog". (%e countr" i! now committed to a free mar-et econom" and globali?ation. >ut!ourcing in t%e field! of R*D and manufacturing i! t%e next be!t e ent in t%e P%armaceutical indu!tr". Spiraling co!t= expiring patent!= low R*D co!t and mar-et d"namic! are dri ing t%e MC5! to out!ource bot% manufacturing and re!earc% acti itie!. &ndia wit% it! apt c%emi!tr" !-ill! and low co!t ad antage!= bot% in re!earc% and manufacturing coupled wit% !-illed manpower will attract a lot of bu!ine!! in t%e da"! to come. For t%e fir!t time

in man" "ear! t%e international P%armaceutical indu!tr" i! finding great opportunitie! in &ndia. (%e proce!! of con!olidation= w%ic% %a! become a generali?ed p%enomenon in t%e world P%armaceutical indu!tr"= %a! !tarted ta-ing place in &ndia. (%e P%armaceutical &ndu!tr"= wit% it! ric% !cientific talent! and re!earc% capabilitie!= !upported b" &ntellectual Propert" Protection regime= i! well !et to mar- it! place a! a Sunri!e &ndu!tr". MA2OR PLAYERS: (%e top fi e companie! in t%e indu!tr" IRanbax"= ,laxo= :upin= $oec%!t and 5ipla account for onl" 17 percent of t%e indu!tr"E! turno er= and t%e top ten control around '1 percent of t%e mar-et. (%e major multinational pla"er! in t%e organi?ed !ector of t%e indu!tr" are E Merc- F&ndiaG= Par-eI Da i! F&ndiaG =Pfi?er =R%oneIPoulenc F&ndiaG= ,laxoI3ellcome= Co arti!= and Smit%-line Beec%am P%armaceutical!. (%e main &ndian bul- drug! and formulation! manufacturer! in t%e organi?ed !ector are Dr. Redd"E! :aboratorie!= &pca laboratorie!= D B 5%emical! * P%armaceutical!= Cic%ola! Piramal &ndia= Ranbax"= 5ipla= Sun P%armaceutical!= and 3oc-%ardt. (%e unorgani?ed !ector account! for '8 percent of t%e total indu!tr" !ale!. Mo!t of t%e pla"er! in t%e unorgani?ed !ector are in ol ed in formulation! manufacturing= !ince t%i! i! not tec%nolog" inten!i e. (%e!e pla"er! mainl" cater to local demand and compete on price. (%e &ndian p%armaceutical! indu!tr" i! e!!entiall" a proce!! re!earc% dri en indu!tr". (%e indu!tr" i! %ig%l" fragmented. Some of t%e di!ea!e! for w%ic% new drug! are continuou!l" re!earc%ed globall" include A&DS= Al?%eimer0! di!ea!e= art%riti! Fr%eumati!mG= cancer= depre!!ion= diabete!= %eart di!ea!e= o!teoporo!i! and !tro-e. &ndia i! pre!entl" one of t%e top 1. drug producer! worldwide. &ndian p%armaceutical companie! %a e progre!!ed b" leap! and bound! in recent time!. (%i! i! e ident from t%e fact t%at w%ile t%e MC5! mar-et !%are in t%e &ndian p%armaceutical mar-et %a! plummeted from 2.< in 1721 to approximatel" '.< at pre!ent= t%e mar-et !%are of t%e &ndian companie! %a! increa!ed to 1.<. Dome!tic pla"er! account for o er 28< mar-et !%are and t%e re!t i! accounted for b" MC5!. (%e leading dome!tic companie! are Dr. Redd"E! :aboratorie! FDR:G= Ranbax" :aboratorie! FR::G= Sun P%armaceutical!= 5ipla= :upin :aboratorie!= >rc%id 5%emical! and 3oc-%ardt w%ile t%e

leading MC5! are ,laxo!mit%-line= Pfi?er= A enti! P%arma and Merc- &ndia. &f one con!ider! t%e entire %ealt%care !cenario= allopat% account! for .8< of t%e o erall &ndian mar-et= a"ur eda account! for '8< and !id%a= unani= %omeo and ot%er !"!tem! !%are t%e re!t. B .3 !4 1): About t%reeIfift%! of &ndia0! bul- drug! output i! !old o er!ea!. $owe er= mo!t of t%e &ndian p%armaceutical companie! a! well a! t%eir MC5 counterpart! import bul- drug! from abroad a! dome!tic companie! t%at export formulation! are eligible for dut" free import! of buldrug!. Ander patent drug! are primaril" exported to de eloping countrie! w%ile t%e generic! are exported to de eloped nation!. F+40 .-t'+/): About 6.< of t%e dome!tic production i! con!umed locall". 3it% t%e exception of certain life !a ing= new generation underIpatent formulation!= &ndia i! relati el" !elf !ufficient in formulation!. (%e current &ndian formulation! mar-et i! wort% about R!.78 billion and %a! a growt% rate of about 1.I11< pa. (%e main mar-et! for &ndian formulation! include de eloping countrie! !uc% a! 5%ina= Sout% Africa= and 5&S. &ndia %a! al!o bagged a 18I"ear tran!ition period to introduce (rade Related &ntellectual Propert" Rig%t! F(R&PSG. During t%i! timeIframe= new molecule! patented for t%e fir!t time in t%e world after Danuar" 1= 177.= w%en t%e (R&PS agreement came into force will be granted recognition= for w%ic% an application need! to be made in &ndia. (%e de eloper would be entitled to exclu!i e mar-eting rig%t! for fi e "ear! during t%e tran!ition period. Some of t%e main ad antage! w%ic% t%e &ndian p%armaceutical companie! %a e o er t%eir MC5 counterpart! include9

Re!triction to parent compan"0! portfolio and lac- of freedom to re er!e engineer an" ot%er MC50! product!. More DP5> FDrug! Price 5ontrol >rderG co erage owing to a more mature product range. :ac- of initiati e on part of parent compan" to introduce new product! due to ab!ence of patent protection and t%reat of proce!! pirac" and compul!ion to price t%e product lower in &ndia compared to ot%er countrie!. $ardl" an" export opportunitie! due to parent0! global pre!ence. Expen!i e manufacturing co!t due to parent compan"0! in!i!tence on !tricter compliance of ,MP F,ood Manufacturing Practice!G.

DOMESTIC TRADE: More t%an 6.< of t%e formulation! produced in t%e countr" i! !old in t%e dome!tic mar-et. &ndia i! largel" !elfI!ufficient in ca!e of formulation!. Some life !a ing= new generation underIpatent formulation! continue to be imported= e!peciall" b" MC5!= w%ic% t%en mar-et t%em in &ndia. > erall= t%e !i?e of t%e dome!tic formulation! mar-et i! around R!118bn and it i! growing at 18< p.a. GRO5TH INDICATOR

THE EXIM SCENARIO: Cearl" 7. < of &ndiaE! bul- drug need! are met t%roug% indigenou! production. $owe er= in!pite of %a ing a wellIde eloped p%armaceutical indu!tr"= it continue! to import not onl" intermediate! and c%emical! re;uired b" t%e bul- drug indu!tr"= but al!o !ome of t%e bul- drug! and !pecialt" formulation!. >ne po!iti e factor= %owe er= i! t%at o er t%e la!t decade or !o= t%e overall exports by the pharmaceutical industry have been more than its imports. &n fact= t%e bul- of t%e growt% of t%e p%arma !ector %a! come

t%roug% export!. I06+4t): &ndia0! p%armaceutical! import! Fincluding bul- drug!= formulation!= intermediatiate!= c%emical!= !ol ent! etcG were to t%e tune of R!'1.'bn. &mport! %a e regi!tered a 5A,R of nearl" 278 '/ t*% 6-)t 5 "%-4). &mport! of formulation! %a e increa!ed !ignificantl" in t%e pa!t . "ear! regi!tering 5A,R of '#.7< in t%e pa!t . "ear!. &n FM77 '06+4t +, ,+40 .-t'+/) grew b" 25.58 "o". &mport of bul- drug! %a e !lowed down in t%e pa!t #I' "ear! mainl" due to two rea!on! @ fir!tl" t%ere i! o er capacit" in t%e dome!tic mar-et and !econdl" t%e ;ualit" of bul- drug! manufactured b" t%e local manufacturer! %a e impro ed !ignificantl" and t%e" act a! import !ub!titute for MC50! re;uirement!. E96+4t)9 > er 18< of &ndia0! bul- drug production i! exported. (%e balance i! !old locall" to ot%er formulator!. &ndia0! P%armaceutical export! are to t%e tune of R!62bn= of w%ic% formulation! contribute nearl" ..< and t%e re!t +.< come! from bul- drug!. &n financial "ear #888= %96+4t) 14%: #" 2;8. &ndia0! P%armaceutical! import! were to t%e tune of R)20.7#/ '/ FY200;. &mport! %a e regi!tered a 5A,R of onl" #< in t%e pa!t . "ear!. &mport of bul- drug! %a e !lowed down in t%e recent "ear!. (%e export! of P%armaceutical! during t%e "ear 1776I72 were R! +7268 million. From a meager R! +1 crore! wort% of P%armaceutical!= Drug! and Fine 5%emical! export! in 1768I61= P*-40-&% t'&-. %96+4t) %a! 4')%/ t+ -664+9'0-t%." R! 11.# 5rore! FPro .1776I77G= a ri!e of ;;.<;8 -1-'/)t t*% .-)t "%-4 %96+4t). Among!t t%e total export! of &ndia= t%e percentage !%are of Drug!= P%armaceutical! and Fine 5%emical! during AprilI>ctober F#888I#881G wa! +.1<= an increa!e of 2<.

PRICING

Drug! and formulation! are under price control for more t%an t%ree decade! now. (%e economic reform! initiated b" t%e ,o ernment of &ndia in Dul" 1771= tric-led down to t%e P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" onl" in 177+ and t%at too partiall". Price control in a large number of indu!trie! %a! alread" been aboli!%ed. (%e P%armaceutical indu!tr" in &ndia i! t%e onl" indu!tr" being !ubjected to a t%reeItier control= i?. 1. &temIb"Iitem control on t%e price! of bul- drug!= #. ProductIwi!e control on t%e price! of formulation! and an o erall control on t%e profitabilit" of formulation!. '. Admini!trati e and rigid price control %a! certainl" retarded t%e de elopment of t%i! e!!ential indu!tr". &n toda"0! liberali?ed economic en ironment= determining Nco!t!O of 2+ bul- drug! and %undred! of t%eir formulation! and fixing ceiling price! i! outdated. (%e co!t plu! formula of fixing price! lead! to inefficienc" @ lower t%e efficienc"= %ig%er t%e co!t and more t%e mar-Iup. &ndependent profe!!ional !tudie! %a e re ealed t%at at t%e &ndu!tr" le el= after Drug! FPrice! 5ontrolG >rder= FDP5>G 177.= o erall price increa!e during t%e period 177.I76 on "ear o er "ear ba!i!= i! mode!t and muc% below t%e a erage rate of inflation. 5ompetition %a! -ept price! under control e en in t%e ca!e of decontrolled formulation!. (%e fear t%at price! will ri!e !teepl" if t%e indu!tr" i! deregulated i! di!pro ed b" t%e!e independent !tudie! o er a period of time. Mar-et competition i! t%e be!t regulator of price!. Medicine! bear a %ea " burden of taxe!. (oda" almo!t e er" P%armaceutical product i! taxed to t%e extent of '8I'. percent t%roug% cu!tom! dut"= exci!e= !ale! tax= octroi and ot%er taxe!. (%i! burden on t%e con!umer -eep! ri!ing "ear b" "ear. &n a wa"= t%e tax on medicine i! tax on !ic-ne!!. &deall"= t%ere !%ould be no tax on medicine!. Alternati el"= t%e tax !%ould be reduced !ub!tantiall".

&n t%e emerging bu!ine!! !cenario= a mar-etIoriented approac% !%ould be adopted. (%ere !%ould be a !%ift from t%e pre!ent !"!tem of control to management and monitoring drug price!. (%e indu!tr" !%ould be encouraged to fo!ter !elfIregulation and concentrate on de elopment i!!ue! rat%er t%an

being !ubjected to detailed and admini!trati e control. (%e traditional approac%e! and con!er ati e idea! of control= regulation! and admini!tration will %a e to gi e wa" to free enterpri!e= flexibilit"= tran!parenc" and !peed" implementation of public policie!.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT


Re!earc% * De elopment i! t%e -e" to t%e future of P%armaceutical indu!tr". (%e P%armaceutical ad ance! for con!iderable impro ement in life expectanc" and %ealt% all o er t%e world are t%e re!ult of a !teadil" increa!ing in e!tment in re!earc%. R * D in t%e P%armaceutical indu!tr" in &ndia i!

critical to find an!wer! for !ome of t%e di!ea!e! peculiar to a tropical countr" li-e &ndia and al!o for finding !olution! for unmet medical need!. (%e R = D %96%/!'t 4% b" t%e I/!'-/ P*-40-&% t'&-. '/! )t4" i! -4+ /! ;.<8 +, t*% '/! )t4">) t 4/+(%4. (%i! ob iou!l" i! er" low w%en compared to t%e in e!tment on R = D #" ,+4%'1/ 4%)%-4&* #-)%! P*-40&+06-/'%). (%e" )6%/! ;0 ? ;@8 +, t*% t 4/+(%4 +/ R = D . $owe er= now t%at &ndia i! entering into t%e Patent protection area= man" companie! are !pending relati el" more on R * D. (%ere i! con!iderable !cope for collaborati e R * D in &ndia. &ndia can offer !e eral !trengt%! to t%e international R * D communit". (%e!e !trengt%! relate to a ailabilit" of excellent !cientific talent! w%o can de elop combinatorial c%emi!tr"= new !"nt%etic molecule! and plant deri ed candidate drug!. &ndu!trial R * D group! can al!o carr" out limited primar" !creening to identif" lead molecule! or e en candidate drug! for furt%er in i o !creening= preIclinical P%armacolog"= toxicolog"= animal and %uman P%armaco-inetic! and metabolic !tudie! before ta-ing t%em up for %uman trial!. &n !uc% collaboration!= %armoni?ed !tandard! of !creening can be a!!ured following e!tabli!%ed good laborator" practice!. 3%en it come! to clinical e aluation at t%e time of multiIcentre trial!= &ndia would pro ide a !trong ba!e con!idering t%e real a ailabilit" of clinical material! in di er!e t%erapeutic area!. Suc% acti e collaboration will be mutuall" beneficial to bot% partner!. According to a !ur e" b" t%e P%armaceutical >ut!ourcing Management A!!ociation and BioPP%armaceutical >ut!ourcing Report= P%armaceutical companie! are utili?ing !ub!tantiall" t%e !er ice! of 5ontract Re!earc% >rgani?ation! F5R>!G. &ndian P%armaceutical &ndu!tr"= wit% it! ric% !cientific talent!= pro ide! co!tIeffecti e clinical trial re!earc%. &t %a! an excellent record of de elopment of impro ed= co!tIbeneficial c%emical !"nt%e!e! for ariou! drug molecule!. Some MC5! are alread" !ourcing t%e!e !er ice! from t%eir &ndian affiliate!. (%e P%armaceutical and Biotec%nolog" &ndu!tr" i! eligible for weig%t deduction for R*D expen!e upto 1.8<. (%e!e R*D companie! will al!o enjo" tax %olida" for 18 "ear!. A promotional re!earc% and de elopment fund of R!.1.8 crore! i! !et up b" t%e ,o ernment. (%e &ndian P%armaceutical indu!tr" i! %ig%l" regulated. (%e ,o ernment control! price! of a large number of bul- drug! and formulation!. Profit margin! of pla"er! ar" widel" in bot% dome!tic and export !ale! due to man" factor!.

PATENT AND R = D
(%e P%armaceutical indu!tr" i! a -nowledge dri en indu!tr" and i! %ea il" dependent on Re!earc% and De elopment for new product! and growt%. $owe er= ba!ic re!earc% Fdi!co ering new molecule!G i! a time con!uming and expen!i e proce!! and i! t%u!= dominated b" large global multinational!. &ndian companie! %a e recentl" entered t%e area and initial re!ult! %a e been encouraging. Patent! pla" an important role in encouraging Re!earc% and De elopment. (%e new 3(> rule! impl" t%at &ndia will %a e to !witc% to a product patent regime po!t #88. from it! current proce!! patent regime. (%i! would alter t%e !cenario in t%e &ndian mar-et o er t%e next 18I1. "ear!. ,o ernment policie! will pla" an important role in defining t%e future of t%e P%armaceutical indu!tr". (%e product patent regime coming into effect from Danuar" #88. will lead to longIterm growt% for t%e future. &n t%e global P%armaceutical mar-et= we!tern mar-et! are t%e large!t and fa!te!t growing due to introduction of newer molecule! at %ig% price!. A wellIe!tabli!%ed reimbur!ement and in!urance !"!tem implie! t%at per capita drug expenditure i! abnormall" %ig% in 3e!tern 5ountrie! a! compared to t%e de eloping nation!. (%e &ndian P%armaceutical indu!tr" i! %ig%l" fragmented= but %a! grown rapidl" due to t%e friendl" patent regime and low co!t manufacturing !tructure. &nten!e competition= %ig% olume! and low price! c%aracteri?e t%e &ndian dome!tic mar-et. Export! %a e been ri!ing at around '8< 5A,R o er la!t fi e "ear!. (%ere i! a !%ift in export profile toward! alue added formulation! from low alue bul- drug!. (%e Drug Pricing 5ontrol >rder FDP5>G %a! been t%e mill!tone around t%e nec- of &ndian indu!tr" a! it %a! !e erel" re!tricted profitabilit" and %ence inno ation. $owe er= t%e go ernment %a! been relaxing control! in a !low but progre!!i e manner. (%e !pan of control of DP5> %a! come down from 78< in 1768! to .8< in 177. and i! li-el" to be furt%er reduced a! per t%e late!t propo!ed c%ange!. &ndian companie! are putting t%eir act toget%er to tap t%e generic drug! mar-et! in t%e regulated %ig% margin mar-et! of t%e de eloped countrie!. (%e AS mar-et will remain t%e mo!t lucrati e mar-et for t%e &ndian companie! led b" it! mar-et !i?e and t%e inten!it" of bloc-bu!ter drug! going off patent. An e!timated ASH+.bn of drug! expected to go off patent b" #882 in AS alone. &n t%e dome!tic mar-et= old and mature categorie! li-e antiI infecti e!= itamin!= analge!ic! are degrowing or !tagnating w%ile new life!t"le

categorie! li-e cardio a!cular= 5CS= anti diabetic are growing at doubleIdigit rate!. (%e growt% of a compan" in t%e dome!tic mar-et i! t%u! criticall" dependent on it! t%erapeutic pre!ence.

GLOBAL PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY


Some of t%e worldE! large!t P%armaceutical companie! too- a %it on fourt%I;uarter profit! la!t "ear a! a re!ult of patent expiration! and manufacturing problem!. Eli :ill" * 5o.= for example= !aw it! annual !ale! plummet dramaticall" after it lo!t patent protection on it! antidepre!!ant Pro?ac in Augu!t. $owe er= t%e P*-40-&% t'&-. '/! )t4" ') 6+')%! ,+4 - ;0 6%4&%/t )-.%) 14+:t* '/ 2002= -&&+4!'/1 t+ 2002 Industrial Outlook= a report b" &ndu!trial &nformation Re!ource!= $ou!ton. (%e A.S. P%armaceutical indu!tr" will in e!t in capital and maintenance expenditure! for manufacturing

capacit" expan!ion!= a! well a! for re!earc% and de elopment FR*DG laboratorie!. &ncrea!ing manufacturing capacit" and expanding R*D are -e"! to continued indu!tr" !ucce!!= !a"! t%e report. AN%: 64+! &t) -4% t*% .',%#.++! +, t*% P*-40-&% t'&-. '/! )t4"BA !a"! 5arl Berg!ten= ice pre!ident= P%armaceutical! and biotec%nolog" for :oc-wood ,reene= Spartanburg= S.5. P*-40-&% t'&-. &*%0'&-.): (%e o erall P%armaceutical indu!tr" i! managing to !ta" a%ead of t%e P%armaceutical c%emical! mar-et. (%e world P*-40-&% t'&-. &*%0'&-.) 0-43%t :'.. '/&4%-)% @.7 6%4&%/t -// -.." t+ CD7.5 #'..'+/ '/ 2005B !tate! a new report from (%e Freedonia ,roup= 5le eland. World Pharmaceutical Chemicals cite! generic competition= downward profit pre!!ure! and tig%ter price control! a! dri er! t%at will prompt A.S.= Dapane!e and 3e!tern European drug ma-er! to pur!ue greater production efficiencie!. A! a re!ult= P%armaceutical c%emical co!t! will fall under greater !crutin" and decrea!e a! a percentage of total drug !%ipment!. An increa!ed emp%a!i! on pre ention= !a"! t%e Freedonia ,roup report= will broaden opportunitie! for !e eral cardio a!cular agent!= e!peciall" new !econdIgeneration ti!!ue pla!minogen acti ator! for pre enting !tro-e! and %eart attac-!. >t%er new P%armaceutical c%emical! projected to enjo" !trong growt% include leu-otriene bloc-er! for a!t%maL monoclonal antibodie! for tran!plant rejection= and !erotonin .$(' antagoni!t! for irritable bowel !"ndrome and accine! for influen?a.

Q(%e P%armaceutical c%emical !egment i! !eeing !omew%at le!! inten!e re!earc% becau!e of t%e boom in biologicall" produced product!=Q !a"! :oc-wood ,reeneE! Berg!ten. Q(%e intere!t in t%e $uman ,enome Project and in de eloping product! coming out of t%i! effort %a! di erted !ome of t%e re!ource! traditionall" applied to product! deri ed b" c%emical !"nt%e!i!.Q E 4+6%-/ -/! 1%/%4'&) 0-43: (%e European P%armaceutical indu!tr" i! expected to grow 6.1 percent from 1777 !ale! to reac% H1.8 million b" #88.= !a"! European Pharmaceutical Industry= a report from Corwal-= 5onn.Iba!ed Bu!ine!! 5ommunication! 5o. &nc. (%e ri!ing co!t of R*D %a! increa!ed t%e co!t of inno ati e drug! and impo!ed added pre!!ure on t%e abilit" of drug manufacturer! to mar-et in t%e European Anion. Anli-e t%e A.S. P%armaceutical !ector= European national go ernment! are t%e main purc%a!er! of P%armaceutical product!L t%erefore= t%e" dictate re!triction! or co!t containment mea!ure! on drug producer!. Q(%e role of generic companie! al!o i! %a ing an impact on t%e indu!tr"=Q !a"! Dennifer 5a!a??a= global mar-eting manager for P>:M>) 3ater Soluble Re!in! at t%e Dow 3ater Soluble Pol"mer! P%armaceutical ,roup= Qand will continue to do !o gi en t%e number of large brand! t%at are coming off patent RworldwideS. &n fact= analge!ic!= aminopenicillin!= cep%alo!porin!Igeneration

anti%i!timine!= acid reducer!= %erbal and related extract! and calcium and iron mineral! are among t%e P%armaceutical c%emical! expected to fare well on t%e open mar-et= t%e Freedonia ,roup report affirm!. QAl!o= generic! are concentrating on not ju!t de eloping Eme tooE er!ion! of t%e branded product!=Q continue! 5a!a??a= Qbut de eloping uni;ue deli er" !"!tem! for differentiation andPor %ig%er performance T t%i! add! more complexit" to t%e traditional competiti e en ironment.

T+6 20 P*-40-&% t'&-. C+06-/'%) #-)%! +/ 2000 P*-40-&% t'&-. 4%(%/ %) 1. ,laxoSmit%Bline H#'.. billion #. Pfi?er H##.1 billion '. MercH16.1 billion +. A!traUeneca H1..2 billion .. A enti! H1..# billion 1. Bri!tolIM"er! S;uibb H1+.+ billion 2. Do%n!on * Do%n!on H1#.8 billion 6. Co arti! H18.7 billion 7. P%armacia H18.6 billion 18. American $ome H18.6 Product! billion 11. Eli :ill" * 5o. H18.# billion 1#. F. $offmanI:a H6.1 Roc%e billion 1'. Sc%eringIPloug% H6.' billion 1+. Ba"er A, H..6 billion 1.. (a-eda 5%emical H..# &ndu!trie! billion 11. Sanofi S"nt%Vlabo H..8 billion 12. Boe%ringer H+.. &ngel%eim billion 16. Abbott :aboratorie! H+.8 billion 17. San-"o 5o. :td. H'.6 billion #8. S%ionogi * 5o. H#.6 billion

2000 R=D E96%/!'t 4%) 1. Pfi?er #. ,laxoSmit%Bline '. A enti! +. Do%n!on * Do%n!on .. Co arti! 1. A!traUeneca 2. F. $offmanI:a Roc%e 6. Merc7. Ba"er A, 18. Eli :ill" * 5o 11. P%armacia 1#. Bri!tolIM"er! S;uibb 1'. American $ome Product! 1+. Abbott :aboratorie! 1.. Sc%eringIPloug% 11. (a-eda 5%emical &ndu!trie! 12. Sanofi S"nt%Vlabo 16. Boe%ringer &ngel%eim 17. San-"o 5o. :td. #8. S%ionogi * 5o. H+.+ billion H'.6 billion H'.1 billion H#.7 billion H#.7 billion H#.1 billion H#.. billion H#.' billion H#.' billion H#.8 billion H#.8 billion H1.7 billion H1.2 billion H1.' billion H1.' billion H21# million H678 million H66+ million H.6+ million H#'8 million

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT EIPR)


(%e dri ing force w%ic% will c%ange t%e c%aracter and !%ape of t%e P%armaceutical indu!tr" will be t%e impending Product Patent regime. At pre!ent= under t%e &ndian Patent! Act= 1728= t%ere i! no Product Patent protection for P%armaceutical!. (%ere i! onl" Proce!! Patent protection. (%e duration of proce!! patent protection in &ndia i! !e en "ear! from t%e date of filing or fi e "ear! from t%e date of !ealing of t%e patent= w%ic%e er i! !%orter= for P%armaceutical!= food product! and agroc%emical! a! again!t fourteen "ear! for all ot%er item!. &ndia !igned t%e ,eneral Agreement on (ariff! and (rade F,A((G on April 1.= 177+ along wit% 1#+ Cation!. After &ndia0! member!%ip of 3orld (rade >rgani!ation F3(>G= it i! obligator" for &ndia to compl" wit% t%e re;uirement! of ,A(( including (rade Related A!pect! of &ntellectual Propert" Rig%t! F(R&P!G. (%i! !%ould be done wit%out an" furt%er dela". &ndia %a! an excellent pool of !cientific talent!. Earl" adoption of world cla!! &PR will moti ate !ome of t%e di!tingui!%ed &ndian Scienti!t! wor-ing abroad to return to &ndia and engage t%em!el e! in re!earc%. >nce a !trong &PR regime i! e!tabli!%ed &ndia can a ail of t%e a!t !cope of e ol ing collaborati e re!earc% arrangement!.

MISCONCEPTIONS AND FACTS


(%e antiIPatent lobb" %a! propounded !e eral m"t%!. Mo!t of t%e!e

are ba!ed on conjecture and are un!upportable on fact!. (%e two mo!t fre;uentl" emplo"ed are Q$ig% Price!Q and Q&mpact on :ocal &ndu!tr"Q. Bot% of t%e!e are addre!!ed below9 M"t* +, FH'1* P4'&%! M%!'&'/%) -,t%4 C*-/1% '/ P-t%/t L-:)> : A m"t% i! propagated t%at after introduction of Patent Act= in compliance wit% (R&P! pro i!ion!= t%e price! of medicine! will accelerate and medicine! will become unaffordable for people. (%i! fear i! due to a lac- of under!tanding of %ow t%e tran!ition to a Patent Regime wor-! and %ow P%armaceutical price! are determined. Patent! can ne er be awarded retro!pecti el". Patent! can onl" appl" to new di!co erie!. (%e tran!ition pro i!ion! of (R&P0! en!ure t%at patent! in &ndia will onl" be granted for totall" new di!co erie!= po!t 1!t Danuar" 177.. >nl" item! for w%ic% no patent %a! e er been granted in an" ot%er 3(> countr" before 1!t Danuar"= 177. or for w%ic% no application wa! pending for a patent in an" ot%er 3(> countr" a! on 1 !t Danuar" 177. will e er be patentable in &ndia. (%i! mean! t%at an" medicinal product alread" a ailable in t%e &ndian mar-et on t%e date of coming into force of t%e new law= cannot= and will not= e er be patented in &ndia. &t !%ould be noted t%at it ta-e! an"w%ere between 6I1# "ear! for a new drug to be granted regi!tration b" Drug Aut%oritie! of an" countr" after w%ic% mar-eting permi!!ion i! gi en. (%i! regi!tration period come! out of t%e o erall patent life of t%e medicine!= w%ic% i! now almo!t uni er!all" #8 "ear! from t%e date of application. A di!co erer t%u! enjo"! at be!t onl" 6I1# "ear! of Exclu!i e Mar-eting for reco ering t%e co!t of re!earc%. (%e number of new drug! regi!tered worldwide eac% "ear i! between #.I'..

5*-t t*') %))%/t'-.." 0%-/) '): A. 3it%in t%e tran!ition period F177.I#88+G allowed for &ndia= not more t%an a %andful of new drug! will actuall" ;ualif" for an" form of

exclu!i it". B. E en after &ndia commence! granting patent!= b" t%e time patented product! become a !ignificant proportion of t%o!e alread" a ailable locall"L it will be anot%er 18I1. "ear! i.e. #81.I#8#8. 5. &t i! not correct to belie e t%at Multinational 5orporation! FMC5!G %a e onl" one price for a product e er"w%ere in t%e world and a! !uc% t%e price c%arged in &ndia will be exorbitant. (%ere are !e eral example! to !%ow t%at e en w%en t%e product i! uni;ue= it i! introduced in &ndia at a price !ignificantl" lower t%an in 3e!tern countrie!. Mo!t international manufacturer! will ba!e t%eir pricing !trateg" for countrie!= li-e &ndia= on Qaffordabilit" criteriaQ. (%ere i! empirical e idence FStud" b" t%e Cational Economic Re!earc% A!!ociate! @CERA= 3a!%ington @ Danuar" 1776 and Stud" b" Dr. $ein? Redwood entitled /Cew $ori?on! in &ndia0 I 177+G to !%ow t%at price! do not ri!e after &PR. M"t* +, FD-0-1% t+ L+&-. I/! )t4"> : A! %a! been !tated earlier= t%e effecti e period of exclu!i it" enjo"ed b" a patent %older i!= at be!t= 6I1# "ear!. >nce patent life end!= ot%er manufacturer! are free to mar-et /generic er!ion!0 of t%e !ame product!. 3orldwide= generic mar-et! are growing at a rate fa!ter t%an t%at of patented product!. (%ere will t%erefore alwa"! be a large generic mar-et in &ndia and t%i! will continue to be dominated b" &ndian companie!.

PATENTS AND ITS IMPACT ON PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IN INDIA AND ON CONSUMERS

PRODUCT PATENT: (%e !weep of intellectual propert" rig%t! i! er" a!t a! it embrace! man" !ector! of global econom" and tec%nolog" !uc% a!= p%armaceutical= food= mec%anical= c%emical= bioItec%nical= en ironmental= energ"= agriculture= textile= etc. $ere t%e di!cu!!ion i! limited to t%e p%armaceutical patent!. (%e ad ent of protection of inno ati e wor- for a limited period under t%e &ntellectual Propert" S"!tem F&PSG permit! t%e full di!clo!ure of wor-= in!tead of -eeping it !ecret. Suc% an en ironment facilitate! !%aring of t%e inno ati e wor- wit% ot%er! and at t%e !ame time en!uring certain amount of reward to t%e inno ator. &n recent time!= due to ad ancement of communication facilitie!= t%e flow of -nowledge %a! al!o increa!ed tremendou!l" and t%e !"!tem of &ntellectual Propert" F&PG permit! !%aring and commercial tran!action of t%e new -nowledge gained. >ne of t%e important factor! in t%e tremendou! growt% of p%armaceutical indu!tr" worldwide %a! been t%e protection afforded b" t%e patent!. Patent! %a e gi en t%e in entor t%e nece!!ar" incenti e to de elop new proce!!e! or molecule!= w%ic% are now widel" u!ed in t%erap". (%e nation! wit% !tronge!t patent !"!tem %a e introduced t%e large!t number of new drug! into t%e world mar-et. DEFINITION OF PATENT: (%e patent i! granted b" t%e go ernment= w%ic% confer! on t%e applicant a guarantee for a limited period of time= t%e exclu!i e pri ilege of ma-ing= !elling= di!tributing and u!ing t%e in ention for w%ic% t%e patent %a! been granted and al!o of aut%ori?ing ot%er! to do !o. (%e grant of patent! for in ention! in &ndia i! go erned b" t%e Patent Act 1728 and t%e Patent Rule 172#. (%e patent! granted under t%e Act are operati e in w%ole of &ndia.

TYPES OF PATENTS: (%ree -ind! of patent! are granted under t%e pro i!ion! of t%e Act= i?.= An ordinar" patent A patent of addition for impro ement in or modification of an in ention

for w%ic% a patent %a! alread" been applied for or granted A patent granted in re!pect of con ention application= w%ic% i! ba!ed on an application= made in a con ention countr" in re!pect of !ome in ention (%e con ention application %a! to be made wit%in one "ear from t%e date of t%e fir!t application made in a con ention countr" in re!pect of t%at in ention.

5HAT DOES PATENTS DOG : (%e patent gi e! t%e owner t%e rig%t to ta-e legal action to pre ent ot%er! from exploiting a patented in ention wit%out t%e proprietor0! con!ent. (%i! rig%t can be u!ed to pre ent competition w%il!t t%e proprietor de elop! a bu!ine!! ba!ed on t%e in ention. Moreo er anot%er per!on or compan" ma" be allowed to exploit t%e in ention and pa" ro"altie! under a licen!ing agreement. CRITERIA FOR PATENTABILITY: An" in ention= w%ic% !ati!fie! t%e definition of t%e Nin entionO gi en in t%e act= ma" be patented. For !ecuring a patent under t%e Act= t%e in ention mu!t be N+(%.t": no elt" of an in ention i! judged ta-ing into account t%e -nowledge a ailable an"w%ere in t%e world in t%e rele ant field at t%at time of filing t%e application for patent. (%e in ention !%ould not be publicl" -nown an"w%ere in t%e world prior to t%e date of filling t%e application for t%e patent. I/(%/t'(% )t%6: An in ention i! con!idered to %a e an in enti e !tep or i! non ob iou! if w%en compared to w%at i! alread" -nown= t%e in ention would not be ob iou! to one wit% rea!onable -nowledge and experience of t%e !ubject. I/! )t4'-. -66.'&-t'+/: &n ention mu!t %a e utilit" and mu!t ta-e practical form !uc% a! an apparatu!= de ice a product !uc% a! new material= compound or an indu!trial proce!! producing !aid product or an" impro ement of t%e abo e.

GENERAL PROCEDURE TO OBTAIN A PATENT :

(%e following are t%e !ucce!!i e !tage! of procedure for obtaining a patent. o o o o o o o o Filling an application for a patent accompanied b" pro i!ional or complete !pecification. Filling t%e complete !pecification if a pro i!ional !pecification accompanied wit% t%e application. Examination of Applicant. Acceptance of application and ad erti!ement of !uc% acceptance in official ga?ette. > ercoming oppo!ition= if an"= to t%e grant of a patent. Sealing of t%e patent. Amendment of application and !pecification if needed. Filling application for t%e patent out!ide &ndia

THE PROPOSED PATENT REGIME : Following t%e !igning of ,A(( in 177+= &ndia %a! to compl" wit% t%e (R&PS accord= w%ic% call! for replacement of Proce!! Patent! wit% !tricter Product Patent! wit%in a certain time frame. April 1777 9 A! per (R&PS Article 28.6 and 28.7 &ndia %ad to W &ntroduce a /Mail box0 !"!tem accepting filling for Product Patent! from 1 Danuar" 177. W Pro ide for EMR in re!pect of Patent! co ered b" !uc% filling!= on !ati!faction of certain condition!. &n t%e recent deci!ion= t%e 3(> made it mandator" for &ndia to pro ide for /mail box0 and EMR pro i!ion! b" mid April= 77. D%&%0#%4 ;<<<: A! per (R&PS Article 1.= &ndia %a! until December '1= 1777 to bring Patent :egi!lation in conformit" wit% (R&PS. 2-/ -4" 2005: A! per trip! Article 1. t%e actual implementation of product patent pro i!ion! can be dela"ed until Danuar" 1= #88..

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS EIPR) IN GATT


&ndia i! one of t%e founder member! of ,eneral Agreement on (ariff! and (rade F,A((G. ,A(( la"! down a !et of multilaterall" agreed rule! to go ern international trade. (rade Related &ntellectual Propert" Rig%t! F(R&PSG agreement under t%e ,A(( pro ide! for uni er!al protection of &PR of t%e firm! and indi idual!. &t bind! t%e countrie! to modif" t%eir law! to compl" wit% t%e pro i!ion! of t%e (R&PS agreement. &ndia being !ignator" of 3(>= t%e pro i!ion of 3(> !tand enacted from 1 !t Danuar" 177.. Ander t%e agreement= &ndia %a! been gi en a c%ange o er period of 18 "ear! from proce!! patenting !"!tem to product patenting !"!tem. (%erefore= from 1!t Danuar" #88. product patent regime will be enforced in &ndia. &n addition= Exclu!i e Mar-eting Rig%t! FEMRG will %a e to be granted for a period of . "ear! for p%armaceutical! and agricultural c%emical product! in fa or of foreign patent %older! w%o %a e applied for and obtained product patent and

mar-et appro al of !uc% product! in ot%er member! countrie! of t%e 3(>. (%i! will appl" to newl" patented product! coming in t%e mar-et during t%e tran!ition period of t%e 18 "ear! i.e. up to 1!t Danuar" #88..

INDIAN PATENT ACTB ;<H0: P*-40-&% t'&-. I/! )t4" '/ I/!'- (%e &ndian Patent Act= 1728 wa! t%e in!trument t%at made it po!!ible for t%e dome!tic P%armaceutical indu!tr" to expand rapidl". Becau!e= t%e Act legali?ed /re er!e engineering0 of drug! t%at are patentable a! product! t%roug%out t%e indu!triali!ed world but unprotectable in &ndia. FR%(%4)% %/1'/%%4'/1I ') - 0%t*+! +, %(-. -t'+/ +, - 64+! &t '/ +4!%4 t+ /!%4)t-/! 't) , /&t'+/-. -)6%&t) -/! /!%4."'/1 '!%-). (%i! tec%ni;ue ma" be u!ed to de elop a !imilar For e en identicalG product. 3ell e;uipped wit% tec%nological experti!e= &ndian !cienti!t! and bu!ine!!e! !ei?ed t%e opportunit" to do /re er!e engineering0 on t%erapeuticall" inno ati e drug! di!co ered el!ew%ere= and launc%ed t%em on t%e dome!tic mar-et a! well exporting t%em to ot%er countrie! wit% !imilar gap! in t%eir patent co er. For example= t%e &ndian &n!titute for 5%emical (ec%nolog" de eloped AU(= t%e A&DS drug t%roug% t%i! proce!! wit%out replicating t%e patentI

%older Burroug%!I3ellcome0! proce!!. (%e tec%nolog" wa! pa!!ed on to 5&P:A= t%e fourt% large!t P%armaceutical manufacturer in &ndia. &t wa! al!o !old to a Bra?ilian manufacturer. (%e co!t of t%e crucial medicine t%roug% t%i! route %a! come down to le!! t%an a t%ird of t%e Burroug%I3ellcomeE! price. Anot%er factor i! t%at of !trategic abdication of man" tran!national corporation! w%o refu!ed to compete wit%out t%e patent co er. For example= t%e SterlingI3int%rop 5ompan" wound up t%eir bu!ine!! in &ndia in 1728! and !old t%eir !%are! to t%e &ndian partner De"0! Medical 5ompan". Furt%ermore= /!%4 t*% I/!'-/ P-t%/t A&tB ;<H0B t*% ,+..+:'/1 6+'/t) -4% 6%4t'/%/t9

N+ 64+! &t 6-t%/t) -4% -..+:%! in P%armaceutical= agroIc%emical and food proce!!ing !ector!= w%ere onl" proce!! patent! are admi!!ibleL (%e &ndian patent term of 1+ "ear! from t%e date of filing for P%armaceutical proce!!e!= i! curtailed to 2 "ear! from t%e date of filing or . "ear! from t%e date of !ealing a patent= w%ic%e er i! !%orterL and P%armaceutical proce!! patent! are automaticall" deemed to be endor!ed :icen!e of Rig%t for ' "ear! from t%e date of !ealing a P%armaceutical patent. 3it% t%e coming of (R&P! Agreement= di!pute! ari!e wit% regard to t%e protection of P%armaceutical patent!. (%e main pro i!ion! of (R&P! Agreement wit% re!pect to P%armaceutical product! are a! follow!9 (%e 0'/'0 0 6-t%/t t%40 :'.. #% 20 "%-4) ,4+0 ,'.'/1J Patent protection i! to be extended to P%armaceutical product!L &mportation mu!t be accepted a! a wor-ing patentL 5ompul!or" licen!ing i! relegated to !pecial circum!tance!L &n infringement !uit! o er proce!! patent! t%e /burden of proof0 i! re er!ed. Pro ide tran!itional arrangement!Tdeferment of t%e acceptance of P%armaceutical product patent! b" de eloping countrie! for ten "ear!L and :imited exclu!i it" i! granted to de eloping countrie! for P%armaceutical product! w%o!e patent application! are filed after t%e

enforcement of t%e (R&P! Agreement.

TRIPS ETRADE RELATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS) AND PHARMACEUTICALS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIA
A LOOK AT THE TRIPS AGREEMENT 5ontrar" to popular belief= intellectual propert" legi!lation! not onl" co er patent! but al!o t%e ac;ui!ition and u!e of a range of rig%t! co ering different t"pe! of creation! including t%at of an ae!t%etic c%aracter Fe.g. arti!tic wor-! and indu!trial de!ign!G and information and !ign! of a purel" commercial alue Fe.g. trademar-!G among ot%er!. &ntellectual propert" rig%t! F&PR!G include t%e following categorie! F!ee Box 1. Al!o !ee Annexure 1 for detail! about t%e categorie! of intellectual propert" rig%t!G9

5op"rig%t and related rig%t!= (rademar-!= ,eograp%ical indication!= &ndu!trial de!ign!= Patent!= :a"out de!ign! of integrated circuit!= (rade !ecret!=

Breeder!E rig%t!= and

Atilit" model!. $owe er= t%e ,A(( Agreement on (rade Related A!pect! on &ntellectual Propert" Rig%t! F(R&P!G co er! t%e fir!t !e en categorie! onl". Per%ap! t%e indu!triali?ed nation! Fand t%eir bu!ine!! lobbie! t%at acti el" promoted t%e (R&P! negotiation!G %ad little intere!t in t%e excluded categorie!. A! mentioned in Box 1= patent i! t%at t"pe of intellectual propert" rig%t a major application of w%ic% occur! in t%e P%armaceutical !ector. According to t%e Anited Cation! definition= a patent i! a legall" enforceable rig%t granted b" a countr"E! go ernment to an in entor. &n !imple word!= t%e content of intellectual propert" i! information= and t%i! i! exerci!ed wit% re!pect to t%e product! t%at carr" t%e protected information. A patent exclude! ot%er per!on! from manufacturing= u!ing or !elling a patented product or from utili?ing a patented met%od or proce!!. And= becau!e of t%i! intellectual propert" rig%t! ma" %a e a direct and !ub!tantial impact on indu!tr" and trade. Before t%e conduct of t%e (R&P! negotiation! wit%in t%e ,A(( t%ere exi!t a number of international organi?ation! and con ention! regarding t%e protection of intellectual propert". (%e 3orld &ntellectual Propert" >rgani!ation F3&P>IIa Anited Cation! !peciali?ed agenc"G %a! been particularl" acti e in t%e de elopment of new form! of protection Fla"out de!ign! of integrated circuit!G a! well in t%e application of new tec%nologie! of patent! Fe.g. biotec%nological application!G and cop"rig%t Fe.g. computer programme!G. $owe er= t%e following are t%e rea!on! for w%ic% t%e indu!triali?ed nation! pre!!ed for t%e (R&P! negotiation!= c%o!e t%e organi?ation !etting rule! for world trade F3orld (rade >rgani!ationIIa forum wit%out an" tradition of wor- in t%e field of intellectual propert" rig%t!G a! t%e forum for implementation of t%e (R&P! Agreement9

(%e de eloped countrie!= t%roug% patent! and ot%er protecti e in!trument!= are pro ided wit% t%e po!!ibilit" of exporting product! incorporating inno ation! under exclu!i e or monopoli!tic rig%t!= i.e. tec%nolog"I%older! can exclude competition from dome!tic producer! in importing countrie! or ot%er foreign firm! F!ee Smit%= Pamela= &ntellectual Propert" Protection and Anited State! Export!9 E idence in t%e Data= Paper pre!ented at t%e 5onference on &nternational Relation!

on &ntellectual Propert"9 5%allenge! at t%e (urn of t%e 5entur"= (%e American Ani er!it"= 3a!%ington D. 5.= 177.. (%e !tud" indicate! !ignificant increa!e in t%e AS export! to countrie! w%ere intellectual propert" protection %a! been enforcedGL and

An Agreement wit%in t%e ,A((P3(> facilitate! recour!e to cro!!I retaliation for nonIfulfilment of !pecific obligation!. &n !imple word!= countrie! failing to compl" wit% (R&P! could be !ubject to trade retaliation if t%e 3(> di!pute !ettlement mec%ani!m determined t%e exi!tence of a ca!e of nonIcompliance wit% t%e (R&P! Agreement.

B+9 ;: S #$%&t M-tt%4 -/! M-'/ F'%.!) +, A66.'&-t'+/ +, I/t%..%&t -. P4+6%4t" R'1*t) T"6%) +, I/t%..%&t -. P4+6%4t" R'1*t)

S #$%&t M-tt%4

M-'/ F'%.!)

5%emical!= drug!= pla!tic!= engine!= Cew= nonIob iou!= indu!triall" Patent! turbine!= electronic!= applicable indu!trial control and !cientific e;uipment Sign! or !"mbol! to identif" good! (rademar-! All indu!trie! and !er ice! Printing= entertainment Faudio= ideo= motion 5op"rig%t >riginal wor-! of aut%or!%ip picture!G= !oftware= broadca!ting &ntegrated MicroIelectronic! >riginal la"out de!ign! circuit! indu!tr" Breeder!E Cew= !table= %omogeneou!= Agriculture and food rig%t! di!tingui!%able arietie! indu!tr" (rade !ecret! Secret bu!ine!! information All indu!trie! &ndu!trial 5lot%ing= automobile!= >rnamental de!ign! de!ign! electronic!= etc. ,eograp%ical ,eograp%ical origin of good! and 3ine!= !pirit!= c%ee!e indication! !er ice! and ot%er food product! Atilit" model! Functional model!Pde!ign! Mec%anical indu!tr"

Source: The TRIPs A reement: A !uide "or the South# South Centre# !eneva# $%%&

TRIPSB PHARMACEUTICALS AND INDIA Except in t%ree !ector!9 food proce!!ing= P%armaceutical and agroI c%emical! t%e &ndian patent law allow! product patent!. &n t%e!e !ector! onl" proce!! patent! are allowed. A! on toda"= &ndia %a! a proce!! patent regime regarding P%armaceutical product!. (%erefore= t%e &ndian Patent Act= 1728 %a! to be c%anged to bring it in line wit% t%e international law! on patenting of P%armaceutical Fand agroIc%emicalG product!. Being a de eloping nation= &ndia %a! a grace period of fi e "ear! to c%ange it! patent law! under t%e Agreement on (R&P!. &n ot%er word!= t%e &ndian Patent Act= 1728 will %a e to be amended !uitabl" b" '1!t December 1777. At t%e !ame time= de eloping countrie! li-e &ndia are gi en a grace period of ten "ear! for tec%nologie! pre iou!l" unprotected in it! mar-et. During t%i! interim period of ten "ear!= all patent application! will be put in a /blac- box0. $owe er= P%armaceutical corporation! can appl" for an exclu!i e mar-eting rig%t FEMRG for t%eir product! for fi e "ear! onl" e en before t%e countr" in ;ue!tion %a! full" p%a!ed into t%e new patent protection !"!tem. (%e pro i!o i! t%at t%e product mu!t %a e been regi!tered for a patent and %a! recie ed mar-eting rig%t! in an" of t%e 3(> Member countrie!. (%u! it i! a bac-door met%od for granting t%e monopol" rig%t!. Furt%ermore t%ere i! a gre" area %ere too. &f mar-eting rig%t! are granted onl" for fi e "ear!= w%at will be it! po!ition for t%e remaining fi e "ear! until t%e countr" in ;ue!tion actuall" amend! it! patent law!. A! for example= t%ere i! lig%t at t%e end of t%e tunnel for &ndiaE! /patentE muddle= and particularl" t%e P%armaceutical patent. (%e idea i! to amend t%e exi!ting patent law wit% a pro i!ion w%ic% will allow it! drug indu!tr" to cop"

world cla!! /pre!criptionE medicine! for re!earc% purpo!e! e en before a patent expire!. &n lieu of t%i! pro i!ion= &ndia can offer incenti e! to world drug manufacturer!= e.g. t%e exten!ion of exclu!i e mar-eting rig%t! for an extra "ear. A careful peru!al of pro i!ion! of t%e (R&P! Agreement re eal! t%at !uc% a mo e will not iolate t%e (R&P! Agreement under t%e aegi! of t%e 3(>. Suc% a deci!ion would come under Article '8 of t%e Agreement w%ic% deal! wit% t%e exception! to rig%t! conferred9 QMember! ma" pro ide limited exception! to t%e exclu!i e rig%t! conferred b" a patent= pro ided t%at !uc% exception! do not unrea!onabl" conflict wit% a normal exploitation of t%e patent and do not unrea!onabl" prejudice t%e legitimate intere!t! of t%e patent owner= ta-ing account of t%e legitimate intere!t! of t%ird partie!.Q (ran!national corporation! FMC5!G control 78 percent of all regi!tered patent! in t%e world. Effecti el"= gi en !uc% monopol" power o er patent! and t%e EMR clau!e= &ndia or for t%at matter an" de eloping countr" doe! not %a e an" tran!ition period. (%i! i! true for protected tec%nolog"= and if one interpret! t%at from t%e patentPproductIoriginating countr" angle. (%i! i! t%e %a?ie!t part of t%e (R&P! Agreement wit% re!pect to t%e P%armaceutical and al!o t%e agroIc%emical !ector!. An in!tance of %a?ine!! i! t%at t%e Agreement i! !ilent on t%e content and !cope of t%e EMR clau!e. Furt%ermore= it ma-e! no reference to action! w%ic% t%ird partie! would be permited to ta-e Ffor in!tance= wit% re!pect to product! alread" mar-eted or to product! manufactured b" a proce!! different from t%e patented proce!!G. (%ird partie! ma" interpret t%e EMR clau!e a! not including a iu! pro%ibendi= i.e. not including t%e rig%t to exclude ot%er! from u!ing t%e in ention= a! in t%e ca!e of patent!. Apart from t%e %a?ine!! mentioned abo e= for t%e de eloping countr" li-e &ndia= t%e following are clear concern! of t%e (R&P! Agreement i!IXI i! t%e P%armaceutical !ector9

(%e introduction of product patent! ma" impl" !ignificant !ocial co!t! due to t%e %ig%er price! c%arged for medicament!L (%e acce!! to local firm! of protected tec%nolog" will become more difficult becau!e of t%e enforcement of t%e patentI%olderE! bargaining po!ition t%roug% in e!tment! in R*DL and (%ere i! t%e po!!ibilit" t%at t%e mo!t d"namic !egment! of t%e P%armaceutical mar-et= w%ere t%e pro!pect! of growt% are %ig%e!t= will

be excluded from dome!tic firm!. (%i! i! li-el" to be true for drug! ba!ed on biotec%nolog" w%ere in enting around Fi.e de eloping drug! wit% !imilar compo!ition!G i! relati el" more difficult. $owe er= gi en t%e pre!ent da" political econom" !et up= it i! futile for a de eloping countr" li-e &ndia to adopt a reacti e !tance wit% re!pect to P%armaceutical patent!. &n ot%er word!= t%e rational polic" would be to cope wit% t%e !ituation proIacti el". Furt%ermore= in realit" t%e fear! expre!!ed abo e ma" not come true F!ee page +II5on!e;uence! of (R&P!9 M"t%! and Realit"G. E en if t%e fear! %a e come true t%ere are po!!ible wa"! out if one approac%e t%e i!!ue proIacti el". An example of t%e proIacti e approac% i! to go for compul!or" licence! FArticle 6 of t%e (R&P! AgreementG on ground! of competition= %ealt% and public intere!t F!ee Box +G. Article 6 of t%e (R&P! Agreement !tate! t%e rig%t of partie! to Qadopt mea!ure! nece!!ar" to protect public %ealt% and nutrition= and to promote public intere!t in !ector! of ital importance to t%eir !ocioIeconomic and tec%nological de elopment= pro ided t%at !uc% mea!ure! are con!i!tent wit% t%e pro i!ion! of t%i! AgreementQ Femp%a!i! addedG. For example= in 1771 a ,erman 5ourt granted a compul!or" licence in fa our of a ,erman firm wit% re!pect to a patent Frelating to interferonG %eld b" a AS firm on ground! of public intere!t. (%e purpo!e of t%e licence wa! to allow t%e mar-eting of a t%erapeutical application of interferon t%at %ad been de eloped b" t%e ,erman firm. Anot%er FproIacti eG wa" out i! t%ere in Article '8 of t%e Agreement Fexception! to rig%t! conferredII!ee Box #G. (%e following are t%e exception! w%ic% ma" be deemed legitimate under Article '89

&mportation of a protected product t%at %a! been legitimatel" put on t%e mar-et el!ew%ereL Act! carried out pri atel" and on a nonIcommercial !cale or for a nonI commercial purpo!eL A!e of an in ention for re!earc% and experimentation and for teac%ing purpo!e!L Preparation of medicine! for indi idual ca!e! according to a pre!criptionL 5ompul!or" licen!ingL and

A!e of t%e in ention b" a t%ird part" w%o !tarted= or too- !eriou! precautionar" action= before t%e application for t%e patent For of it! publicationG. (%e t%ird wa" out i! wit%in Article #2 of t%e Agreement w%ic% deal! wit% patentable !ubject matter. Article #2.1 !tate!9 QSubject to t%e pro i!ion! of paragrap%! # and '= patent! !%all be a ailable for an" in ention!= w%et%er product! or proce!!e! in all field! of tec%nolog"= pro ided t%at t%e" are new= in ol e an in enti e !tep and are capable of indu!trial application...Q $ere= in enti e !tep and capable of indu!trial application ma" be deemed b" a Member to be !"non"mou! wit% t%e term! nonIob iou! and u!eful= re!pecti el" F!ee Annexure 1G. Article #2.# !tate!9 QMember! ma" exclude from patentabilit" in ention!= t%e pre ention wit%in t%eir territor" of t%e commercial exploitation of w%ic% i! nece!!ar" to protect order public or moralit"= including to protect %uman= animal or plant life or %ealt%...Q FEmp%a!i! originalG. Furt%ermore= Article #2.' FaG !tate!9 QMember! ma" al!o exclude from patentabilit"9 diagno!tic= t%erapeutical and !urgical met%od! for t%e treatment of %uman! or animal!.Q

CONSELUENCES OF TRIPS: MYTHS AND REALITY (R&P! doe! not pro ide for t%e retro!pecti e patenting in &ndia of drug! t%at are alread" on t%e mar-et or co ered b" exi!ting patent application! el!ew%ere. (a-ing into account t%e tran!itional period= t%ere will be le!! impact on price! of newIpatented drug! on t%e &ndian mar-et during t%e 1778! and onl" a minimal effect until #88.. (%ereafter it will build up graduall" from a pool of new drug!. ,lobal progre!! in re!earc% and de elopment i! repleni!%ing t%i! pool at a !tead" but moderate pace a! older drug patent! expire F!ee Box 'G.

Phar a!"uak# as Pat#nts E$%ir# A#+ t M0 US !4 1) :'t* C;@#/ )-.%) '/ ;<<@ -4% )%t t+ .++)% 6-t%/t 64+t%&t'+/ #" t*% "%-4 2002. T*') :'.. t*4+: t*% 1-t% +6%/ ,+4 &+06%t't'+/ ,4+0 1%/%4'& !4 1). 5%eaper drug price and bonan?a for generic drug! will alter t%e re!earc% and bu!ine!! of P%armaceutical major!. T+ ,'.. t*% 6-t%/t 1-6B !4 1 0-$+4) -4% t 4/'/1 0+4% t+ #'+t%&*/+.+1" !%(%.+60%/t -/! +t*%4 6-4t/%4). (%e pre!!ing need! for new drug! %a e led to t%e earlier -!+6t'+/ +, /%: t%&*/+.+1'%). T+ -(+'! t*% FT-1-0-t C4')')> E.+)) +, 6-t%/t))B t*% &+06-/'%) -4%

'/&4%-)'/1." '/(%)t'/1 '/ 4')3'%4B & tt'/1N%!1% t%&*/+.+1'%). Smit%-lineI Beec%am i! one of t%e fir!t !uc% companie! to leap into new tec%nologie! for geneI%unting. Again= ,laxo= after reali?ing t%e futilit" of bloc-bu!ter dependenc"= i! contemplating to de elop broader /portfolio0 of drug!. (%e rationale i! to minimi?e ri!-! a!!ociated wit% t%e de elopment of new drug!. $ere= one %a! to con!ider t%e moderate pace of P%armaceutical inno ation and of ob!tacle! for mar-et penetration b" new drug! in &ndia. S &* &+/)'!%4-t'+/ .%-!) t+ t*% &+/&. )'+/ t*-t '/ (-. % t%40) /+t 0+4% t*-/ ;5 6%4&%/t +, t*% I/!'-/ 0-43%t :'.. #% &+(%4%! #" 6-t%/t) )+0% t'0% -,t%4 2005. (%e 4%0-'/'/1 D5 6%4&%/t +, t*% 0-43%t :'.. &+/t'/ % t+ #% %96+)%! t+ t*% '06-&t +, 1%/%4'& &+06%t't'+/ F!ee Redwood= $ein?= and Cew $ori?on! in &ndia9 (%e 5on!e;uence! of P%armaceutical Patent Protection= >ldwic- Pre!!= 177+G. (%e time !cale of t%e introduction of P%armaceutical patent! in &ndia under (R&P! ma-e! it certain t%at= if I/!'-/ !4 1 64'&%) 4')% ! 4'/1 t*% 4%0-'/!%4 +, t*% ;<<0)B 't :'.. /+t #% ,+4 4%-)+/) +, 6-t%/t'/1. (%e earlie!t !tart of premium pricing for patented drug! will be in t%e earl" "ear! of t%e next decade. N+ )'1/','&-/t %,,%&t &-/ #% -/t'&'6-t%! /t'. -,t%4 2005B #%&- )% t*% :%'1*t -1% +, 6-t%/t%! !4 1) +/ t*% I/!'-/ 0-43%t :'.. #% t++ )0-.. ,+4 %&+/+0'& '06-&t. More important t%an t%e time !cale of patent protection will be fundamental /c%ec-! and balance!0 w%ic% will put a bra-e on t%e impact of premium pricing on &ndian drug expenditure F!ee Box +G. Suc% balance! are a! follow!9

(%e low purc%a!ing power of &ndian con!umer!L ,o ernment price control! under permanent or re!er e power!L and

(%erapeutic competition from c%eaper unpatented drug!. >f t%e!e t%e !econd i! t%e mo!t immediate= w%erea! t%e fir!t and t%e t%ird are t%e mo!t /durable0 !afeguard! again!t a price explo!ion. C+06 .)+4" L'&%/)'/1 +, C+00%4&'-. M%!'&'/%) P+))'#.% According to t%e 5oIordinator of t%e Forum of Parliamentarian! on &ntellectual Propert"= &ndia= B B Be"ala= compul!or" licen!ing of P%armaceutical product! /for commercial purpo!e!0 i! po!!ible wit%in t%e ambit of t%e (R&P! Agreement9 N&ndia !%ould draw !trengt% from Article! 2 and 6 of (R&P! and in!i!t on compul!or" licen!ing of

P%armaceutical product! for commercial purpo!e!.O (%e current under!tanding= under Article '1 of t%e agreement= i! t%at (R&P! pro i!ion! onl" allow compul!or" licen!ing for nonIcommercial u!e. $owe er= Article 2= w%ic% outline! t%e objecti e! of t%e intellectual propert" agreement= !tate! t%at implementation of t%e agreement !%ould inter alia /contribute to t%e tran!fer and di!!emination of tec%nolog"0. Furt%ermore= Article 6 gi e! Member countrie! t%e rig%t to adopt mea!ure! to /protect public %ealt% and nutrition0 and /promote public intere!t0. &ndia !%ould interpret t%e!e article! in t%e national intere!t !ince t%e con!titutional guarantee of t%e rig%t to life encompa!!e! t%e rig%t to %ealt%= w%ic% re;uire! a ailabilit" of medicine! at affordable price!= a!!ert! Be"ala. Source9 Pre!! (ru!t of &ndia= #1.1#.1771 $ere= it will be intere!ting to note t%at 5anada e!tabli!%ed t%e Patented Medicine Price! Re iew Board in 1762 under reform! to extend patent protection on brandIname P%armaceutical!. Antil recentl"= t%e Board reac%ed o er 188 !ettlement! wit% t%e P%arma indu!tr"= w%ic% it claim! %a! !a ed con!umer! about 5H118mn. &n a recent ca!e= it ordered a AS compan" &5C P%armaceutical!E local !ub!idiar" to cut t%e price of it! drug9 Kira?ole b" almo!t 78 percent and pa" a penalt" of 5H1.#mn. (%u!= t%ere are precedent! for !uc% price regulation!. (%ere i! ne ert%ele!! a wide!pread belief b" &ndian companie! t%at e en if t%e remaining precondition! for R*D in &ndia were met= t%e" cannot afford t%e co!t of minimum !cale operation!= and t%at onl" MC5! will be in a po!ition to benefit. E identl" MC5! %a e far greater financial re!ource!= but t%e" al!o %a e more di er!e call! on t%o!e re!ource! and are t%em!el e! obliged to ma-e difficult c%oice! w%en it come! to new R*D project!. IMPACT OF TRIPS ON GLOBAL BUSINESS A! expected= t%e propo!ed c%ange! in t%e intellectual propert" regime are welcomed b" t%e global bu!ine!! and t%eir !ub!idiarie! operating in &ndia. Big MC5! li-e $oec%!t= Co arti! etc. %a e alread" !et up 188 percent &ndian !ub!idiarie!. $owe er= mo!t of t%em are intere!ted in pla"ing a waiting game regarding t%eir in ol ement in t%e &ndian P%armaceutical! mar-et. (%e" are li-el" to introduce t%eir newIpatented drug! once t%e !"!tem of product patent become! full" operational. E en in t%at ca!e= mo!t of t%e

new drug! will eit%er be imported a! formulation! or be formulated in &ndia b" u!ing imported bul- drug!. &n !%ort= &ndia i! unli-el" to be a !ite for R*D and production of bul- drug!. According to ,laxoI3ellcome= it i! %olding bac- on in e!tment! in &ndia becau!e of concern! on intellectual propert" rig%t!. $owe er= it %a! plan! to build up olume! in certain t%erapeutic !egment! b" allowing t%eir &ndian !ub!idiar" to negotiate a c%eaper price for import! from t%e parent compan". Ander t%e (R&P! Agreement= &ndia %a! to accept t%e application! for t%e grant of product patent! from 1!t Danuar" 177.. According to one e!timate= up to Dul" 1771= #1+ application! were recei ed b" t%e patent office. Anot%er area of concern i! t%e pricing of drug! under t%e new patent regime. (%oug% it i! a fact t%at t%e price! of &ndian drug! are lower t%an t%o!e pre ailing in de eloped countrie!= t%e future price differential i! unli-el" to be large. (%e rea!on i! to a oid an" action again!t dumping of bul- drug!.

IMPACT OF TRIPS ON INDIAN FIRMS Axiomaticall"= t%e introduction of 64+! &t 6-t%/t'/1 :'.. -,,%&t t*% I/!'-/ P*-40-&% t'&-. ,'40) t+ - .-41% %9t%/t. 5ertainl"= t%e" will be pre ented from ta-ing a circuitou! route to growt% t%roug% t%e adoption of proce!! patent!. At t%e !ame time= !ome of t%em are !eriou!l" concerned wit% t%e expan!ion of t%eir bu!ine!!. T+ -&*'%(% t*%'4 -'0B t*%" -4% '/&4%-)'/1." %96.+4'/1 t*% ,+..+:'/1 +6t'+/): -. D%(%.+60%/t +, N%: D4 1) #. P4+! &t'+/ +, O,,NP-t%/t D4 1) &. P4+! &t'+/ +, P-t%/t%! D4 1) /!%4 L'&%/)% !. M-43%t'/1 +, I06+4t%! D4 1)

-. D%(%.+60%/t +, N%: D4 1) For t%i!= a nece!!ar" condition i! to '/&4%-)% t*% %96%/!'t 4% +/ R=D -&t'('t'%). Drug di!co er" and de elopment %a e to be included in t%e R*D !trateg". &n ot%er word!= t%e focu! of R*D will %a e to be c%anged from t%e inno ation of new proce!!e! to t%at of in ention of new product!. For example= Dr. Redd"0! :aborator" Fa leading &ndian manufacturerG %a! focu!ed it! R*D expenditure on t%e de elopment of new drug! for cancer= bacterial infection! and diabete!. (%e" %a e !et up a re!earc% facilit" at t%e co!t of R! 6 crore Fapproximatel" H#.'mnG. $owe er= a couple of )t4 &t 4-. :%-3/%))%) *-(% t+ #% t-3%/ '/t+ -&&+ /t. Fir!t= gi en t%e !mall !i?e of &ndian firm!= e en a !%arp increa!e in R*D acti itie! will not generate !ufficient fund! for t%e de elopment of new drug!. Secondl"= &ndian firm! lac- manpower and ot%er in!titutional mec%ani!m! to launc% new drug! !ucce!!full" in t%e foreign mar-et.

G'(%/ ) &* .'0't-t'+/)B t*% ,+& ) +, R=D )*+ .! #% +/:

(%e de elopment of inI%ou!e drug! w%ic% %a e t%e !ame t%erapeutic alue of t%o!e exi!ting in t%e mar-etL and Production of indigenou! drug! catering to t%e need! of &ndia and ot%er tropical countrie! w%ere MC5! %a e little or no intere!t in introducing drug! according to t%eir need!.

#. P4+! &t'+/ +, O,,NP-t%/t D4 1) A reali!tic a!!umption i! t%at '/ /%-4 , t 4%B +,,N6-t%/t !4 1) :'.. %0%41% -) +/% +, t*% '06+4t-/t 0-/ ,-&t 4'/1 -&t'('t'%) +, I/!'-/ P*-40-&% t'&-. ,'40). Furt%ermore= offIpatent FgenericG drug! made b" &ndian firm! are going to meet mo!t of t%e dome!tic demand. At t%e !ame time= it i! incorrect to !a" t%at t%eir t%erapeutic alue will be le!! t%an t%e new= onIpatent drug!. 3it% increa!ing concentration of &ndian firm! in generic drug!= it! export pro!pect i! er" %ig%. 5urrentl"= t%e :+4.! 0-43%t ,+4 1%/%4'&

!4 1) ') C20#/B -/! %96%&t%! t+ 14+: t+ CM0#/ #" 2005. &n order to ta-e t%i! opportunit"= leading &ndian firm! Fli-e Ranbax"= S>:= Ea!t &ndia P%armaceutical!G are building t%eir capacitie! to produce generic drug!. For example= S>: F$"derabadG %a! !et up a !eparate di i!ion for t%e production of generic!. Furt%er= it expect! to generate more t%an '' percent of it! annual turno er from generic!. Export! of generic! will get furt%er boo!t from foreign in e!tment in t%i! area. (%e AS P%arma giant Merc- %a! !et up a 188 percent !ub!idiar" to produce and export generic!. $owe er= &ndian firm! are going to face !trong competition from ot%er de eloping countrie!= and e en !ome de eloped countrie!. (%erefore= t%e longIterm !ucce!! of &ndian firm! depend! on impro ed efficienc" and exploration of new mar-et! t%roug% Sout%ICort% and Sout%ISout% coI operation= bot% at t%e producer!0 and con!umer!0 le el.

&. P4+! &t'+/ +, P-t%/t%! D4 1) /!%4 L'&%/)% ,lobal drug de elopment and production are undergoing !tructural c%ange! in recent time!. (%e rea!on! for !uc% c%ange! are9 aG Exponential increa!e in t%e co!t of drug de elopment= bG S%ortening of product life= and cG Stiff competition from generic drug!. &n order to gain maximum re enue wit%in a !%ort period= &ndian firm! are tr"ing to get licen!e! from global P%arma bu!ine!! to produce and mar-et onIpatent drug!. $owe er= t:+ !')&%4/'#.% ,-&t) -4% :+4t* 0%/t'+/'/1:

1. ,lobal P%arma companie! not %a ing muc% !ta-e in &ndian mar-et will not %e!itate to gi e licence to &ndian firm!L and #. 5ompanie! wit% large !ub!idiarie! in &ndia Fli-e ,laxo= Pfi?erG are li-el" to introduce licen!ed drug! t%roug% t%eir !ub!idiarie! onl".

!. M-43%t'/1 +, I06+4t%! D4 1) (%e fourt% option for &ndian P%arma firm! i! mar-eting of imported drug!. Man" &ndian firm! are intere!ted in entering into longIterm arrangement! wit% global bu!ine!!. For example= Ranbax" %a! entered into an alliance wit% Eli :ill". (%e new and liberali?ed drug polic" %a! remo ed import re!triction from all but eig%t categorie! of drug!. (%e remo al of import re!triction! and propo!ed c%ange! in t%e &PR regime will lead to an increa!e in drug! import.

TRIPS: AVAILABILITY AND PRICES OF DRUGS


(%e aforementioned di!cu!!ion on offIpatent drug! re eal! t%e fact t%at t%e" will meet mo!t of t%e demand!. (%erefore= e en under t%e new patent regime Fcompatible wit% t%e (R&P! AgreementG= t%e a ailabilit" and price! of generic drug! will largel" be unaffected. $owe er= t%e !ituation i! different wit% re!pect to new FonIpatentG drug!. (%ere i! no doubt t%at t%e!e drug! will be a ailable in t%e &ndian mar-et Feit%er t%roug% production or under licenceG. But= t%e effect on price! i! ambiguou!. Ander t%e cu!tomar" t%eor" of demandI!uppl"= t%e price le el !%ould come down in future. (%e rea!on i! increa!ed !uppl" and notI!o muc% c%ange in demand. Albeit= t%i! ideal !ituation ma" not be true in practice becau!e of t%e following factor!9

(%e oligopoli!tic nature of global P%arma bu!ine!!L (%e practice of tran!fer pricing b" t%e global bu!ine!!= w%ere monitoring and regulation of price! b" t%e ,o ernment will be difficultL and (%e price !ituation al!o depend! on t%e proportion of patented drug! being !old in t%e &ndian mar-et. At t%e !ame time= t%e global P%arma

bu!ine!! %a! a large number of patented drug! w%ic% come! from t%eir own R*D F!ee (able +G. Furt%ermore= in t%e long run= medical bioItec%nolog" i! going to be t%e area of re!earc% and de elopment. Biotec%nolog" ba!e and re!earc% of &ndian firm! Fexcept t%e ,o ernmentIowned 5entral Drug Re!earc% &n!tituteG i! poor= and t%e" are unli-el" to be able to produce muc% of t%e!e drug! F!ee Box .G. 5*" I/!'- N%%!) R=D '/ M%!'&-. B'+t%&*/+.+1"G &n Marc%= 177.= t%e AS Patent and (rade Mar- >ffice FASP(>G granted t%e patenting of %ealing propert" of %aldi FturmericG. A di!pute aro!e pertaining to t%e i!!ue of patenting of Ntraditional -nowledgeO. Ander t%e Agreement on (R&P!= patenting of Ntraditional -nowledgeO i! barred. Ander t%e 3(> procedure!= an" Member countr" can !ee- re!olution of a di!pute wit% anot%er Member b" formall" a!-ing for /con!ultation!0. &f !uc% /con!ultation!0 fail= 3(> can be a!-ed to !et up a di!pute !ettlement panel to adjudicate t%e i!!ue. &n Augu!t 1771= &ndia0! 5ouncil for Scientific and &ndu!trial Re!earc% F5S&RG approac%ed attorne"! in t%e AS to c%allenge t%e American patent on turmeric. After protracted tec%noIlegal argument!= on Augu!t 1'= 1772= t%e ASP(> une;ui ocall" rejected t%e patent application. &ndia won t%e Battle of $aldig%atiTpolitician! Fand expert!YG from all %ue! Fleft= rig%t or centreG rejoiced at t%e great ictor"FYG. $owe er= t%e real i!!ue i! not t%at of &ndia won= AS lo!t. &t lie! in &ndia0! lac- of re!earc% facilitie! in exploring in and in enting wit% et%noI medicine!. Medical biotec%nolog" can pla" a crucial role %ereTnot in near future= but /now0. ,i en t%e decentrali?ed origin and nature of et%noI medicine!= bot% t%e ci il !ociet" and public !ector re!earc% in!titution! %a e a larger role in t%i! regardTw%at i! re;uired i! public action. Source9 SA3(EE Cew!letter Co.6= AugIDec.= 1771 = (%e Economic (ime!= #+.86.1772= (%e (ime! of &ndia= '1.86.1772 >n t%e ot%er %and= MC5! %a e a large ba!e for re!earc% in medical biotec%nolog" F!ee Box 1G. ,i en !uc% a dominant po!ition= price! of onI patent drug! are li-el" to go be"ond t%e reac% of t%e con!umer! at large in t%e long run. (%erefore= t%e real i!!ue i! not a ailabilit" of new drug! in t%e &ndian mar-et= but people!0 acce!! to t%em. H+%&*)t P-t%/t) A" 4(%!'& H%4# $oec%!t= ,erman" patented t%e &ndian medicinal plant 5oleu! For!-o%lii= w%ic% i! being u!ed for a"ur edic F&ndian traditional medical

!"!temG medicine. (raditional u!e! of t%i! %erb include treatment for cardio a!cular di!ea!e= abdominal colic= re!pirator" di!order!= painful urination= in!omnia and con ul!ion!. &n 172+= a large !cale !creening of medicinal plant! b" 5entral Drug Re!earc% &n!titute of &ndia re ealed t%e blood pre!!ure lowering and antiI!pa!modic effect! of extract! from 5 For!-o%lii. >ne of $oec%!t0! patent! co er! a !pecific formula of t%e plant extract and it! u!e in treating cardio a!cular di!ea!e and intraocular pre!!ure. According to a report of t%e Rural Ad ancement Foundation &nternational= 5anada= in 1772= $oec%!t will begin worldwide mar-eting of it! 5 For!-o%lii ba!ed drug. Source9 Pre!! (ru!t of &ndia= #8.8#.1772

PORTER FIVENFORCE MODEL:


ENTRY BARRIERS: (%e p%armaceutical indu!tr" %a! %ig% barrier! to entr" for !mall firm!. Sub!tantial economic= regulator"= legal= and e en per!onnel ob!tacle! blocnew competitor!. E&+/+0'%) +, )&-.%: &n t%e formulation! !egment t%e economie! of !cale %a e been mitigated for t%e SS& t%roug% exemption! from DP5>. C-6't-. I/(%)t0%/t: (%e initial capital in e!tment i! a deterrent to t%e entr" of new pla"er! on t%e indu!tr"= !ince t%e bul- drug indu!tr" re;uire! %uge amount of in e!tment in capital to exploit t%e in%erent ad antage! of economie! of !cale in it! operation!. $ea " in e!tment i! re;uired in R*D facilitie! !uc% a! re!earc% laboratorie! new product!. G+(%4/0%/t 6+.'&": DPCO: &t doe! not allow independent pricing for drug! %a ing an annual

turno er of more t%an of R!.+ 5rore!. (%i! lead! to er" low margin! on drug! and ma-e! it unattracti e for large number of pla"er! to operate t%u! rai!ing t%e entr" barrier!. F+4%'1/ '/(%)t0%/t: Entr" barrier! for MC5! are %ig% due to a cap on foreign in e!tment to 2+<. I/!'-/ P-t%/t) A&t: Since t%e Act recogni?e! onl" proce!! patent!= it allow! large number of pla"er! to manufacture t%e !ame drug %a ing t%e effect of lowering t%e entr" barrier!. T%&*/+.+1" EP4+! &t'+/B R=D): (%e tec%nolog" for manufacturing bul- drug! and formulation! can al!o act a! an entr" barrier. But t%e &ndian firm! %a e good proce!! !-ill! and t%i! effecti el" lower! t%e entr" barrier!. R*D will pla" an important role in t%e po!tI,A(( era. (%o!e companie! w%ic% %a e t%e nece!!ar" !-ill! and t%e financial mu!cle to carr" on t%e re!earc% will !ur i e. $ea " expenditure! on re!earc% and de elopment are re;uired for t%e arduou! proce!!e! of drug di!co er"= de elopment= manufacturing= and appro al t%roug% t%e Federal Drug Admini!tration. De elopment of a new drug can ta-e 18 to 1. "ear! and co!t o er .88 million dollar!. D')t4'# t'+/ &*-//%.): Ade;uate di!tribution c%annel i! anot%er !ignificant entr" barrier. (%e retailer! are important influencer! in t%e bu"ing proce!! a! t%e" !ometime! recommend !ub!titute product! t%at are out of !toc- and often fail to ad%ere to t%e pre!cription! e en if t%e pre!cribed product i! in !toc-. &t i! t%erefore critical for t%e p%arma companie! to !er ice bot% t%e doctor! and retailer!. (%i! re;uire! t%e p%arma companie! to %a e large !ale! force to meet t%i! c%allenge w%ile t%e MC5! %a e lagged be%ind in t%i! a!pect.

RIVALRY AMONG COM PETITORS: 5urrentl" t%ere are about #+=888 pla"er! in t%e indu!tr". (%e !mall !cale of operation! %a! reduced profit! for mo!t pla"er!. &n t%e bul- drug!

!egment t%e competition i! e!!entiall" on price= a! t%ere i! low le el of product or !er ice differentiation. (%i! indu!tr" !egment i! dri en mainl" b" tec%nolog" and co!t control. 5ompanie! !uc% a! >rc%id and Morepen %a e ac%ie ed international leader!%ip in t%i! !egment. &n t%e formulation bu!ine!! %owe er t%e mo!t important dimen!ion! are brand!= di!tribution !trengt% and new product introduction capabilitie!. 5ompanie! are effecting merger! wit% ot%er companie! %a ing complimentar" product portfolio! to gain acce!! to eac% ot%er! brand!. :arge companie! entering into brand building b" pro iding !cientific information and !upport of clinical re!earc% to doctor! acro!! t%e countr".

BARGAINING PO5ER OF BUYERS: For bul- drug! t%e ot%er formulation ma-ing p%armaceutical companie! are t%e bu"er!. Since t%ere are large number! of formulation ma-er! t%e" do not %a e !trong bargaining power. For t%e formulation!= t%e bu"er! are t%e retail c%emi!t!= t%e con!umer! and in!titution! li-e %o!pital!. (%e p%armaceutical product! are uni;ue in t%e !en!e t%at per!on w%o i! con!uming t%e product doe! not %a e muc% di!cerning power. &t i! t%e doctor! and to !ome extent t%e c%emi!t D+&t+4): (%oug% doctor! account for onl" 11 percent of t%e total !ale!= t%e" are t%e !ingle mo!t important influencer! in t%e purc%a!e deci!ion! of t%e final con!umer!= a! t%e" don0t -now t%e product! t%at are a ailable in t%e mar-et. (%u! t%e p%armaceutical companie! %a e to maintain large !ale! force to !er ice t%e doctor! and t%e retailer! wit% new product information= !ample! etc. R%t-'. &*%0')t): (%e c%ief influence in t%e purc%a!e of >(5 drug! i! t%e retail c%emi!t! and di!tributor!. (%e cu!tomer relie! on t%e information pro ided b" t%e abo e in %i! bu"ing deci!ion.

I/)t't t'+/-. # "%4): &n!titution! bu" drug! in large olume! and prefer to bu" unbranded product!. (%e margin! on t%e!e product! are lower t%an on t%o!e t%at are !old to t%e trade directl". Be!ide! t%e!e t%ere are re!er ation! for t%e !mall !cale !ector in t%e purc%a!e! of t%e go ernment program! !uc% a! t%e Cational Malaria and Cational 5%olera Program!. $o!pital= in!titutional and managed care cu!tomer! u!uall" pa" well below li!t price becau!e of %ea " di!counting and negotiating. (%e" can ac%ie e %ig%er ;uantit" di!count! becau!e of t%eir !uperior purc%a!ing power. Demand %a! a tendenc" to be er" ela!tic wit% t%e!e mar-et !egment!. &n contra!t= drug! !old to w%ole!ale di!tributor! and p%armac" c%ain! for indi idual p%"!ician! and patient mar-et! are priced at t%e %ig%er end of t%e price !cale. BARGAINING PO5ER OF SUPPLIERS: (%e main !upplier! for t%e p%armaceutical indu!tr" are t%e bul- drug manufacturer! and ot%er ba!ic c%emical! nece!!ar" for production of buldrug!. (%e ba!ic drug! are a ailable wit%out an" con!traint!. (%ere are a large number of bul- drug! manufacturer! and t%i! dilute! t%eir bargaining power. (%e t%reat of bac-ward integration b" t%e formulation! manufacturer! i! anot%er rea!on for t%eir le!! bargaining power. 3it% t%e impeding product regime= t%e bul- drug manufacturer! will not be able to re er!e engineer molecule! and mu!t obtain product patent!. (%i! i! bound to bring exclu!i it" to t%e bul- drug manufacturer! and increa!e t%eir bargaining power. THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES: People are turning to alternati e medicine !"!tem! t%at could affect t%e p%armaceutical indu!tr" in a !ignificant manner. &ndia %a! a ric% %i!tor" of traditional medicine !"!tem! t%at are !lowl" !taging a comebac-. (%e drug indu!tr"0! competitor! are traditional !"!tem! !uc% a! A"ur edic= Anani= $omeopat%"= Cature care !"!tem! and new age medicine !uc% a! Rei-i etc. But mo!t of t%e!e medicine !"!tem! do not %a e ade;uate cure for all t%e major -nown di!ea!e= t%erefore t%e" remain limited !ub!titute! for t%e

allopat%ic medicine !"!tem.

PEST +, I/!'-/ P*-40- I/! )t4":


POLITICAL FACTORS: G+(%4/0%/t ,-&t+4): 1. Regulator" roleI pro%ibiti e in pa!t= but it now graduall" toward! encouraging in nature= wit% re!pect to free trade. #. Co. of drug! under DP5> %a! been reduced !ignificantl" from '28 in 1767 to 21 in 177.. '. ,o ernment and municipal bodie! are !pending ''< of total expenditure on %ealt% care in &ndia. ECONOMIC FACTORS: I/(%)t0%/t: &n 172'= R). 225 &4+4% &n 1777= R). 2500 &4+4% Y%-4 ER). C4+4%)) 172' ##. 1722 +.8 1727 .88 176# 188 176. 1.8 1766 688 177' 1=818 177+ 1=#88 177. 1='68 1771 1=188 1772 1=6+8 1776 #=1.8

1777 #=.88 E06.+"0%/t: Direct9 M.@0 .-3*) &ndirect9 2M .-3*) SOCIAL FACTORS: H%-.t* '/!'&-t+4): ;<@0N@; :ife expectanc" FMear!G &nfant moralit" FPer 1888 li e birt%!G Deat% rate FPer 1888G Birt% rate FPer 1888G H%-.t* '/,4-)t4 &t 4%: ;<55N5@ Doctor! 1.=888 Cur!e! 16=.88 $o!pital! +=888 $o!pital Bed! 1=#.=88 8 Primar" $ealt% 2#. 5enter! !ubIcenter! 12=.#1 Co. of Medical +# 5ollege! TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS: ;<<DN<< +=76=167 .=1.=171 1.=872 6=28=111 ##=#71 1='1=616 11# +1.# 1+1 ##.6 +1.2 ;<<DN << 1#.7 17 6.7 #1.+

P4+! &t'+/: (%e proce!! !-ill! are excellent and are comparable to t%e be!t in t%e world. (%i! %a! made &ndia one of t%e lowe!t co!t producer! in t%e world. 3it% t%e impeding product patent regime and a large number of bloc-bu!ter drug! going off patent in t%e &nternational mar-et e!peciall" ASA= t%e &ndian bul- manufacturer! are upgrading t%eir production facilitie! to meet AS FDA !tandard!. (%e &ndian companie! are putting emp%a!i! on in %iItec% ZAPZ5 in!trumentation and on >nline Ki!ual &n!pection mac%ine!. R%)%-4&* = D%(%.+60%/t: An experti!e in re er!e engineering Scientific pool of p%arma ba!e C+/t4-&t 0-/ ,-&t 4'/1: MC5! gi e contract manufacturing w%ic% i! ad antageou! for &ndian companie! a! it i! le!! rigorou! t%an formulation.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
T+ G+(%4/0%/t:

(a-e a proIacti e !tance wit% re!pect to t%e Agreement on (R&P!

Build capacit" for re!earc% and de elopment on indigenou! drug! of decentrali?ed origin $elp re!earc%er! to obtain patent! on t%eir product! b" adopting a !ingleIwindow approac% Adopt a %oli!tic and needIba!ed drug polic" Adopt a rational competition polic" wit% re!pect to t%e P%armaceutical !ector

T+ B )'/%)):

,i e more focu! to pre enti e a!pect! of di!ea!e control w%ile de eloping new drug! De elop Sout%ISout% cooperation w%ile de eloping and producing needIba!ed drug!

T+ C+/) 0%4): Ma-e rational u!e of drug!T/more i! better0 i! a falaciou! concept in t%i! re!pect T+ NGO): Arou!e public action= and con ince Ft%roug% networ-ing and ad ocac"G t%e polit" of t%e nece!!it" of a needIba!ed drug polic"

Reac%ing up to t%e international fora and ad ocate on t%e ariou! i!!ue!Pimplication! of (R&P! on P%arma !ector Reac%ing down to t%e ci il !ociet" at large= and ma-e t%em aware of t%eir traditional -nowledge of indegenou! !"!tem! of medicine

CONCLUSIONS
&n conclu!ion= &ndia !%ould adopt a !trong world cla!! patent law wit%out furt%er dela" for t%e following rea!on!9

FiG De elopment of Science and (ec%nolog" FiiG Attracting Foreign &n e!tment! in (ec%nolog" and Re!earc% FiiiG Re er!ing Brain Drain Fi G 5reation of 3ealt% E') D%(%.+60%/t +, S&'%/&% -/! T%&*/+.+1": &n t%e re!earc% world toda"= w%ere collaboration and alliance! are t%e order of t%e da"= abilit" to networ- wit%in t%e world communit" of !cienti!t! will be !trengt%ened onl" if we %a e !trong &PR. E'') Att4-&t'/1 F+4%'1/ I/(%)t0%/t) '/ T%&*/+.+1" -/! R%)%-4&*: 3orld cla!! and (R&P! compliant law will bring to &ndia t%e benefit! of in e!tment!= funding of R*D and tec%nological de elopment. Funding of R*D i! a major %urdle toda". &ndia can attract fund! from abroad if it gi e! t%e rig%t !ignal!. >ut of total Foreign Direct &n e!tment FFD&G Appro al! during t%e period Augu!t 1771 to December 1776= t%e P%armaceutical &ndu!tr" accounted for a meagre 8.++< of t%e total. E''') R%(%4)'/1 B4-'/ D4-'/: &PR will pro ide c%allenging opportunitie! to retain !cientific talent in &ndia and attract our !cienti!t! and re!earc%er! from abroad bac- into t%e national main!tream. E'() C4%-t'+/ +, 5%-.t*: &ntellectual Propert" create! t%e wealt% of nation!. Recognition of &PR will c%ange our !cientific culture from /cop"ing0 to /creati it"0. For all t%i! to %appen= &ndia !%ould %a e a Patent :aw= w%ic% i! clear and unambiguou! and comparable to t%e be!t !tatute! a ailable to &PR. A wellIdrafted legi!lation will minimi?e litigation and di!pute!. ,i en !uc% a %a?" !cenario it i! difficult to predict t%e future of t%e &ndian P%armaceutical indu!tr" under t%e /new0 regime of intellectual propert" rig%t! and it! relation!%ip wit% international trade. $owe er= certain broad trend! can be pa!teuri?ed. Fir!t i! t%at t%e &ndian P%arma companie! are going to face !tiff competition from t%e global bu!ine!!. (%i! de!pite t%e fact t%at at lea!t in &ndia= t%e P%arma mar-et i! not oligopoli!tic. At t%e !ame time= trend!

in re!earc% and de elopment can ma-e it !o in t%e long run. (%erefore= &ndian companie! can go eit%er for collaboration or concentrate on producing and mar-eting generic drug!. (%i! futuri!tic conclu!ion i! ba!ed on t%e reali!tic a!!umption regarding poor re!earc% and mar-et penetration !trategie! b" t%e &ndian companie!. >n t%e ot%er %and= global P%arma major! are unli-el" to con!ider &ndia a! one of t%eir ba!e! for exploring /new0 drug! t%roug% re!earc%. At mo!t= &ndia can be an /a!!embl"0 point of !ome drug!. (%e tric-ie!t part i! w%at po!ition !%ould t%e &ndian go ernment ta-e. (%e i!!ue i! a politicalI economic one= and %a! to be FproIacti el"G approac%ed from bot% angle!Teconomic! and politic!. Broadl"= t%e ,o ernment of &ndia %a! two option!9

&ntroduce an effecti e regulator" mec%ani!m for /c%ec-! and balance!0 on t%e a ailabilit"= acce!! and price of e!!ential drug!L and

De elop re!earc% facilitie! for t%e introduction of /new0 drug! catering to t%e need! of t%e countr". ,i en it! traditional medicinal plant ba!e= &ndia can ta-e a leading po!ition in de eloping= producing and exporting tropical drug!. 5ompatibilit" between t%e abo e mentioned two option! !er e! a! a ba!e for rational and needIba!ed drug polic".

ANNEXURE
A//%9 4% ;: C-t%1+4'%) +, I/t%..%&t -. P4+6%4t" R'1*t) 5op"rig%t and related rig%t!9 unli-e a patent= cop"rig%t protect! t%e expre!!ion of an idea= not t%e idea it!elf. (%i! mean! t%at= in principle= protection i! onl" extended to t%e form in w%ic% an idea i! expre!!ed Fe.g. t%e particular writing of in!truction! in a computer programmeG= but not to t%e concept!= met%od! and idea! t%at are expre!!ed. 5op"rig%t protection i! pro ided to t%e aut%or! of original wor-! of aut%or!%ip= including literar"= arti!tic and !cientific wor-!. 5op"rig%t %a! al!o been extended to protect computer !oftware and databa!e!. QCeig%bouring rig%t!Q= t%at i!= rig%t! w%ic% are related to cop"rig%t= are accorded to p%onogram producer!= performer! and broadca!ting organi!ation!. (%e owner! of cop"rig%t can generall" pre ent t%e unaut%ori!ed reproduction= di!tribution Fincluding rentalG= !ale and

adaptation of an original wor-. Protection generall" la!t! for t%e life of t%e aut%or plu! fift" "ear! or for fift" "ear! or more in t%e ca!e of wor-! belonging to corporate bodie!. (rademar-!9 trademar-! are !ign! or !"mbol! Fincluding logo! and name!G regi!tered b" a manufacturer or merc%ant to identif" good! and !er ice. A alid trademar- allow! t%e owner to exclude from commerce imitation! li-el" to mi!lead t%e public. Protection i! u!uall" granted for ten "ear!= and i! renewable a! long a! t%e trademar- continue! to be u!ed. ,eograp%ical indication!9 t%e!e are !ign! or expre!!ion! u!ed to indicate t%at a product or !er ice originate! in a particular countr"= region or place. (%ere are different t"pe! of geograp%ical indication!. (%e" are called /appellation! of origin0 if t%e c%aracteri!tic! of t%e product! or !er ice! can be attributed exclu!i el" or e!!entiall" to natural and %uman factor! of t%e place in w%ic% t%e product! or !er ice! originate. &ndu!trial de!ign!9 an indu!trial de!ign normall" protect! t%e ornamental or ae!t%etic a!pect of an indu!trial article. &ndu!trial de!ign! are c%aracteri!ed b" t%eir appeal to t%e e"e. (%ere i! a wide ariet" of re;uirement! and modalitie! of protection pertaining to indu!trial de!ign!. &n !ome countrie!= protection i! ba!ed on no elt"= w%ile in ot%er! on originalit". Furt%er= in !ome countrie! !pecific protection for an indu!trial de!ign coI exi!t! wit% or can be /accumulated to0 cop"rig%t or trademar- protection for t%e !ame de!ign. (%e term of protection generall" range! between fi e and 1. "ear! Fincluding renewalG. Patent!9 patent! are granted b" a go ernment aut%orit" conferring t%e exclu!i e rig%t to ma-e= u!e or !ell an in ention generall" for a period of #8 "ear! Fcounted from t%e date on w%ic% t%e application for t%e patent wa! filedG. &n order to be patentable= an in ention u!uall" need! to meet t%e re;uirement! of ab!olute no elt" Fpre iou!l" un-nown to t%e publicG= nonI ob iou!ne!! Fcontaining !ufficient inno ati ene!! to merit protectionG and indu!trial applicabilit" For u!efulne!!G. Patent! ma" be granted for all t"pe! of proce!!e! and product!= including t%o!e related to t%e primar" !ector of production= namel" agriculture= fi!%ing or mining etc. PatentIli-e protection i! conferred for functional model! and ot%er /minor0 inno ation! under utilit" model! F!ee definition belowG. :a"out de!ign! of integrated circuit!9 t%e protection of t%e la"out For topograp%"G of integrated circuit! i! conferred in mo!t indu!triali!ed countrie!. &t i! a !ui generi! form of protection introduced for t%e fir!t time in t%e ASA in 176+ II limited= li-e cop"rig%t= to t%e de!ign a! !uc% II t%at allow! t%e owner of t%e de!ign to pre ent t%e unaut%ori!ed reproduction and

di!tribution of !uc% de!ign!. Re er!e engineering i! generall" allowed= in accordance wit% t%e indu!tr"E! practice. (%e duration of protection i! !%orter t%an under cop"rig%t Ft"picall" ten "ear!G. (rade !ecret!9 confidential bu!ine!! information= !uc% a! li!t! of client! or recipe!= can be an enterpri!eE! mo!t alued a!!et. 5i il and criminal action! are pro ided for in mo!t legi!lation again!t t%e unaut%ori!ed di!clo!ure or u!e of confidential information Fof a tec%nical or commercial natureG. &n t%i! ca!e= t%ere i! no exclu!i e rig%t= but an indirect t"pe of protection ba!ed on a factual c%aracteri!tic of t%e information Fit! !ecret natureG and it! bu!ine!! alue. Anli-e patent!= trade !ecret! are protected a! long a! t%e information i! -ept !ecret. Breeder!E rig%t!9 t%i! i! a !ui generi! form of protection conferred on plant arietie! t%at are new= !table= %omogeneou! and di!tingui!%able. Exclu!i e rig%t!= a! a minimum= include t%e !ale and di!tribution of t%e propagating material! for around #8 "ear!. Anli-e patent!= breeder!E rig%t! permit t%e u!e b" ot%er breeder! of a protected ariet" a! a ba!i! for t%e de elopment of a new ariet" Ft%e /breeder!E exemption0G and for t%e reIu!e b" farmer! of !eed! obtained from t%eir own %ar e!t! Ft%e /farmerE! pri ilege0G. Atilit" model!9 protection i! gi en to t%e functional a!pect of model! and de!ign!= generall" in t%e mec%anical field. (%oug% no elt" and in enti ene!! are generall" re;uired= t%e criteria for conferring protection are le!! !trict t%an for patent!. (%e term of protection al!o i! !%orter Ft"picall" up to 18 "ear!G. Atilit" model! I w%ic% are concerned wit% t%e wa" in w%ic% a particular configuration of an article wor-! II are di!tinct from indu!trial de!ign!= w%ic% are onl" concerned wit% t%e ae!t%etic c%aracter of an article. Source9 A! in Box 1

GLOSSARY
EMR (%i! form! part of trip! agreement. &t !a"! t%at go ernment! w%ic% a ail of t%e ten "ear! tran!ition period for !witc%ing o er to product patent! are bound to gi e t%e rig%t of exclu!i el" !elling a particular drug in t%eir countr" to a particular compan" w%ic% fulfill! certain condition!. &t mean! t%at no ot%er manufacturer can !ell a particular drug except t%e compan"= w%ic% %a! t%e EMR. (%i! actuall" implie! a monopol"Ili-e !ituation for t%at compan".

MAIL BOX (%i! i! t%e box in w%ic% all t%e application! for t%e P%armaceutical and Agricultural product! patent are -ept. &t will be opened in #88.. (ill t%at time no examination of Application! would be po!!ible.

EMR VS PRODUCT PATENT EMR will cea!e to exi!t once product patent come!. Furt%er= product!

w%ic% were !elling under EMR ma" or ma" not be granted patent. >n t%e ot%er %and= an" product can be granted a patent irre!pecti e of w%et%er it wa! under EMR or not.

Source9 3all Street Dournal= 1'.86.1772

You might also like