Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Video S1. The video shows crumpling of an elastic sheet with a width to thickness ratio of L/h = 500 and a Youngs modulus of Y = 1 GPa. Video S2. Crumpling of an elasto-plastic sheet. The sheet has the same parameters as the one in Video S1, and in addition a yield stress of 10 MPa.
1. Simulation model
A model for thin sheets of elastic or elasto-plastic material was constructed as a triangular lattice with spacing a and size up to 1,000 x 1,000 lattice points. Each lattice point had mass m and moment of inertia I , and they were connected by beam elements. The beams had a 12 x 12 stiness matrix corresponding to three translational and three rotational degrees of freedom at both ends of the beam. The large thickness of the beams was accounted for by including shear eects in the formulation of the stiness matrix. Motion of local degrees of freedom in the beams was opposed by small viscous damping. The magnitude of damping was such that the motion of any single beam was under-damped. Large displacements of beams were taken into account by separating the rigid body rotation of the beam from its local deformation. This kind of formulation for handling large displacements has been used in FEM (see e.g. Criseld, M. A. A. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 81, 131 (1990)) and in the dynamics of deformable bodies (Erleben, K. et al. Physics-based animation, Charles River Media (2005)). The beams had width a, Youngs modulus Yb and Poisson ratio = 1/3. To account 1
Figure 1: Illustration of the simulation model. Stripped visualization shows spheres and skeletons of beams. The sheet thickness h is the same as the sphere diameter d, lattice constant a and the length and width of a beam. The conning shell around the sheet is shown (semi)transparent.
for elasto-plasticity, all deformations exceeding a plastic yield point of beams in tensile strain, bending or torsion were irreversible and resulted in constant stress beyond the yield point. For example, if the tensile strain of a beam exceeded its maximum elastic strain, its tension remained at the value of the yield tension. When the tension was released, the beam recovered its original length added by the amount of plastic strain beyond the yield point. Derivation of the elements of the stiness matrix as well as the elastic limits was made in accordance with standard methods of structural analysis (e.g. Timoshenko, S. Strength of materials, 3rd ed., Krieger Publishing (1976)). Self-avoidance of the sheet was introduced by having an elastic frictionless sphere of radius a/2 and Youngs modulus Ys = Yb at each lattice point. Spheres did not interact with their nearest neighbours so that they did not aect the in-plane compressibility of the sheet. Otherwise, overlapping spheres had a repulsive (compression) force proportional to their depth of overlap and the Youngs modulus Ys . Elastic or elasto-plastic energy of the sheet was calculated as a sum of deformation energies of the individual beams (energies of stretching/compression, bending and torsion of the beams were summed up) and compression energies of the spheres. Crumpling was induced by a spherical shell enclosing the sheet, as in Fig. 1 and in the Supplementary videos. If a sphere was in contact with the shell, it was 2
given a force towards the center of the shell. The magnitude of this force was also proportional to the depth of overlap and the Youngs modulus Y . The shell radius was let to shrink slowly such that the kinetic energy of the sheet remained very small compared to its deformation energy (except for possible spontaneous bucklings of the sheet). The total conning force was determined as the sum of radial compression forces of the spheres in contact with the enclosing shell. Newtons equations of motion were explicitly solved at each time step to propagate the simulation in time. The time step was set m as dt = 4aY . Crumpling of sheets with 106 lattice points required about b 107 time steps.
10 E/
Elastic Elastoplastic 10 1 10
0
(L/h)1/3 10 L/h
2
10
Figure 2: Deformation energy of a single ridge as a function of its length. To form a ridge, two opposing sides of a sheet were bent to an angle /2. An example of a ridge in an elasto-plastic sheet is shown on the left. The areas which contain plastic yielding are marked red. On the right the energy of the ridge is shown as a function of L/h for both elastic and elastoplastic sheets. The expected (L/h)1/3 scaling is marked with a dashed line. This kind of conguration was also called the minimal ridge by Lobkovsky (Phys. Rev. E 53, 3750 (1996)).
1 0.95 0.9
0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Fraction of energy 1 L/h = 1000 L/h = 500 L/h = 250
A 10
4
10
10
Figure 3: Focusing of energy. In a cumulative distributions of deformation energy in crumpled elastic sheets (R/R0 = 0.18) are shown. In b the fraction A of the sheet area in which the energy density exceeds is shown. A corresponding energy map with logarithmic colour coding is shown in the inset.
5. Facet extraction
To determine the facet size distributions of crumpled sheets, 2-d mean curvature maps were thresholded resulting in binary images where areas of positive and negative curvature were marked respectively as black and white (Fig. 4). The local mean curvature of the sheet was extracted from the mesh of lattice sites (Desburn, M. SIGGRAPH99, 317-324). The black and white areas were then split into separate roughly convex regions by applying the watershed algorithm (see e.g. Meyer, F. Signal processing 38, 113-125 (1994)). These regions describe relatively at parts of the sheet surrounded by features of clearly higher local curvature, called ridges and vertices when the curvature becomes high enough. We call these regions facets. Facet areas where determined in pixels and their relative linear sizes were determined as square roots of the areas divided by the linear size L of the sheet. Facets with a size smaller than L/100 were omitted from the analysis. This procedure does not rely on any assumption regarding the detailed shape or energy content of the ridges. It is thus straightforward to apply at any degree of crumpling and in sheets of varying width to thickness ratio. Facet size distributions in crumpled sheets were reasonably well described by a lognormal distribution N (x) exp[(ln(x) )2 /(2 2 )]/(x ) (Fig. 5). The found standard deviations 0.5 for the logarithms of linear facet sizes correspond to 1.0 for the facet areas in excellent agreement with the 1.17 found for crumpled paper in Andresen, C. A., Hansen, A. & Schmittbuhl, J. Phys. Rev. E 76, 026108 (2007). For ridge lengths l in simulated crumpled elastic sheets a lognormal distribution given in the form 2 N (l) exp[(log (l/l0 )) /b)]/( bl) has earlier been found with b = 0.95 (Vliegenthart, G. A. & Gompper, G. Nature Materials 5, 216 (2006)). This corresponds to 0.7, and is also in good agreement with the present results. The lognormal distribution found for the ridge lengths in crumpled paper (Blair, D. L. & Kudrolli, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 166107 (2005)) is as well in agreement with the present result although is a bit wider ( 1.2 1.4). A wider ridge length distribution may arise from the fact that a single facet is surrounded by multiple ridges of varying length. In the case of elastic sheets, a slightly better t in comparison with a lognormal t was provided by a gamma distribution N (x) xa1 /[ba (a)]exp(x/b) with the shape parameter a = 4.0 (Fig. 5). A gamma distribution has previously been found for the segment lengths of a 1-d model of crumpling, owing to interaction at high connement of segment layers (Sultan, E. & Boudaoud, 6
Figure 4: Illustration of facet segmentation. a, Mean curvature eld of a crumpled sheet. b, Thresholded areas of positive (white) and negative (black) curvature. c, The thresholded image segmented into regions which approximate facets.
10
N(x)
10
Elastic Elastoplastic Lognormal Lognormal Gamma 0.025 0.05 x/L 0.1 0.2
Figure 5: Facet size distributions. Distributions of linear facet size are shown for elasto-plastic (yield stress y = 0.01Y ) and elastic sheets of size L/h = 1000. Both distributions are averages over those for six sheets crumpled to R/R0 = 0.18. The parameters of the lognormal distribution t (see text) for elastic sheets are = 2.90 and = 0.52 and for elasto-plastic sheets they are = 3.15 and = 0.47. The parameters of the gamma distribution t for elastic sheets are a = 4.0 and b = 0.015.
A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 136103 (2006)). Crumpled elastic sheets display a much more stronger layering than elasto-plastic sheets, and this may explain their somewhat dierent facet size distributions.
Figure 6: Repeated folding. a, A ridge pattern resulting from repeated folding along the central line. Black and white indicate the two possible directions of folds. b, Ridge patterns at R/R0 0.25 for elastic and elastoplastic sheets. The sheets with L/h = 250 are scaled to the same size as the sheets with L/h = 1000.
the facets necessarily decreases faster than the size of the whole conguration (repeated folding has the maximal ridge length at each stage). An attempt has already been made (Plouraboue, F. & Roux, S. Physica A 227, 173-182 (1996)) to generalize ideal folding into a model with random folds.
7. Fractal dimensions
To nd the fractal dimensions of crumpled elastic and elasto-plastic sheets we crumpled sheets with width to thickness ratios in the interval [100, 1000]. Crumpling was done slowly and the conning force was monitored. The force at which the nal radius of the crumpled conguration was measured was chosen such that the volume fraction of the conguration was reasonable. For example, the nal volume fractions of the smallest elastic sheets (L/h = 100) with a conning force of 50 N were around one third, while those of the biggest sheets simulated (L/h = 1000) were around 10%. The nal radii of the crumpled sheets were plotted as a function of L to determine if there was a relationship R L2/D (this is equivalent to M RD , since M L2 ). From this relationship the mass fractal dimensions D were extracted. The fractal dimension smoothly decreased from its elastic value when the plasticity of material was increased (that is, the yield stress y was decreased). For a conning force of 50 Newtons, we found Del 2.50 for elastic sheets, and Dpl 2.37, Dpl 2.20 and Dpl 2.11 for elasto-plastic sheets with the yield points y /Y = 0.05, 0.01 and 0.002, respectively (see Fig. 7a and Fig. 5 in the main article). For compressing forces of 25 N and 100 N we found Dpl 2.21 and Dpl 2.24 (y /Y = 0.01), and Del 2.45 and Del 2.56, respectively (see Fig. 7b). A slight increase in D for increasing force may arise from the high volume fractions of the nal congurations. For a very high force the sheet would ll the entire compressing shell and the result would be close to D = 3. Examples of ridge patterns at the nal radius are shown in Fig. 8.
a
18 16 14 12 10 8 R[mm] 6 4
Elastic 25N Elastopl. 25N Elastic 100N Elastopl. 100N L
2/2.45
b
18 16 14 12 10 8 R [mm] 6 4 y /Y = 0.002 y /Y = 0.05 L2/2.11 L2/2.37
10
20
30 40 L [mm]
60 80 100
10
20
30 40 L [mm]
60 80 100
Figure 7: Relation between the sheet width and the radius at a xed force of the crumpled conguration. a, The nal radius (R) as a function of the sheet width (L) for fully elastic sheets (blue) and for elastoplastic sheets (red) at total conning forces of 25 N (open symbols) and 100 N (solid symbols). For elastic sheets at 25 N, R L2/Del25 with a fractal dimension of Del25 2.45. For elastic sheets at 100 N, and for elasto-plastic sheets at 25 N and 100 N, the fractal dimensions Del100 2.56, Dpl25 2.22 and Dpl100 2.24 were found. The yield point of the elasto-plastic sheets in a is 1% of the Youngs modulus (y /Y = 0.01). In b R(L) for elasto-plastic sheets of materials with a high and low yield point is shown. For weakly plastic sheets (y /Y = 0.05) Dpl 2.37 was found and for very plastic sheets (y /Y = 0.002) Dpl 2.11. In a and b the physical thickness of the sheets was h = 0.1 mm and the Youngs modulus was Y = 1 GPa. The plots are averages of three simulations.
10
Figure 8: Ridge patterns of elastic and elasto-plastic sheets crumpled by the same force. a, b, c and d show the mean curvature eld of a crumpled fully elastic sheet, and crumpled elasto-plastic sheets with yield points at 5%, 1% and 0.2% of the Youngs modulus, respectively. All sheets have the thickness 0.1 mm, width 80 mm and Youngs modulus 1 GPa. The conning force was 100 N in all cases.
11