The Basel Accords refer to the banking supervision Accords
issued by the Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision (BCBS).
It includes the Basel I , Basel II and Basel III norms.
They are called the Basel Accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland and the committee normally meets there.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)is a committee of banking supervisory authorities that was established by the central bank governors of the G-10 countries in 1974.
Since 2009, all of the other G-20 major economies are represented, as well as some other major banking locales such as Hong Kong and Singapore. Basel Committee on banking supervision introduced the Basel 1 also known as the 1988 Basel Accord , a set of minimum capital requirements for banks.
Basel I is primarily focused on credit risk and appropriate risk weighting of assets. The 1988 Accord requires: The bank to hold capital equal to atleast 8% of their risk-weighted assets (RWA).
The definition of capital is set in two tiers: Tiers 1 being of shareholders equity and retained earnings. Tier 2 being additional internal and external resources available to the bank.
Risk-weighted asset is a bank's assets or off- balance sheet exposures, weighted according to risk.
The Committee insisted that the banks use this approach for capital calculation because 1. it provides an easier approach to compare banks across different geographies 2. off-balance-sheet exposures can be easily included in capital adequacy calculations 3. banks are not deterred from carrying low risk liquid assets in their books
Assets of banks were classified and grouped in five categories according to credit risk: carrying risk weights of 0% (for example cash, bullion, home country debt like Treasuries) 20% (securitizations such as mortgage backed securities (MBS) with the highest AAA rating) 50% mortgaged loans 100% (for example, most corporate debt) some assets were given no rating.
The tier 1 capital ratio = tier 1 capital / all RWA
The total capital ratio = (tier 1 + tier 2 capital) / all RWA
Leverage ratio = total capital/average total assets
Limited differentiation of credit risk There are four broad risk weightings (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%), based on an 8% minimum capital ratio.
Static measure of default risk The assumption that a minimum 8% capital ratio is sufficient to protect banks from failure does not take into account the changing nature of default risk.
No recognition of term-structure of credit risk The capital charges are set at the same level regardless of the maturity of a credit exposure.
Simplified calculation of potential future counterparty risk The current capital requirements ignore the different level of risks associated with different currencies and macroeconomic risk.
Lack of recognition of portfolio diversification effects In reality, the sum of individual risk exposures is not the same as the risk reduction through portfolio diversification. Therefore, summing all risks might provide incorrect judgment of risk
Pillar 1 sets out the minimum capital requirements firms will be
required to meet to cover credit, market and operational risk.
Pillar 2 sets out a new supervisory review process. Requires financial institutions to have their own internal processes to assess their overall capital adequacy in relation to their risk profile.
Pillar 3 cements Pillars 1 and 2 and is designed to improve market discipline by requiring firms to publish certain details of their risks, capital and risk management as to how senior management and the Board assess and will manage the institution's risks.
Three Pillars of Basel II Framework
Pillar 1 : Minimum capital requirements
Institution's total regulatory capital must be atleast 8% (ratio same as in Basel I) of its risk weighted assets, based on measures of THREE RISKS Measuring credit risk
Banks can assess risk using three different ways of varying degree of sophistication
Standardized approach
Foundation IRB(Internal Rating-Based Approach)
Advanced IRB
Credit Assessment AAA TO AA- (%) A+ TO A
(%) BBB+ TO BBB-
(%) BB+ TO BB-
(%) BELOW B-
(%) UNRATE D
(%) SOVEREIGN CREDIT 0 20 50 100 150 100 CLAIMS ON BANKS OPTION1 20 50 100 100 150 100 OPTION 2 20 50 50 100 150 50 OPTION 3 20 20 20 50 150 20 CORPORATES 20 50 100 150 150 100 Probability of default(PD) Probability that counterparty will not meet its financial obligation Loss given default(LGD) Expected amount of loss on default Exposure at default (EAD) Expected amount of exposure maturity Average maturity of the exposure Exposure type (IRBF)
Internal data (IRBF)
Regulatory data (IRBA)
Internal data
(IRBA)
Regulatory data
CORPORATES, SOVEREIGN , OTHER BANKS PD LGD, EAD, M PD, LGD, EAD, M Measuring operational risk
Operational risk is risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. It includes legal risk, such as exposure to fines, penalties etc.
Methods to measure operational risk Basic Indicator Approach Standardized Approach CAPITAL REQUIREMENT
=Average positive gross income over the last three years* 15%
Gross income= net interest and commission income excluding profits/losses from sale of securities BUSINESS LINE BETA FACTOR Corporate finance 18% Trading and sales 18% Retail banking 12% Commercial banking 15% Payment and settlement 18% Supervisory review process has been introduced to ensure
o banks have adequate capital to support all the risks
o to encourage them to develop and use better risk management techniques in monitoring and managing their risks. Process for assessing overall capital adequacy in relation to risk profile. Review and evaluate banks internal capital adequacy assessment Expect banks to operate above the minimum regulatory capital ratios Intervene at early stage to prevent capital from falling below minimum levels Covers transparency and the obligation of banks to disclose meaningful information to all stakeholders
Clients and shareholders should have sufficient understanding of activities of banks, and the way they manage their risks Increased Capital requirement
Profitability- implementation of models
Rating requirement
Absence of historical database( PD,LGD, EAD, M)
Disadvantages for smaller banks
BASEL 3 CAPI TAL REQUI REMENTS- Banks to hold 4.5% of common equity & 6% of tier I capital of Risk Weighted Assets (RWA). {Tier 1 capital= common shares+ retained earnings}
ADDI TI ONAL CAPI TAL BUFFERS- Mandatory capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of RWA. banks must hold 7.0% CET 1 capital on an individual and consolidated basis at all times.
CET 1 capital includes
a) A payment of cash dividends; b) A distribution of fully or partly paid bonus shares or other capital instruments; c) A redemption or purchase by an institution of its own shares or other specified capital instruments; d) A repayment of amounts paid up in connection with specified capital instruments; LEVERAGE REQUI REMENTS Leverage Ratio = Tier 1 capital > = 3% Total exposure
Liquidity coverage ratio(LCR)
The Liquidity Coverage Ratio requires institutions to hold a sufficient buffer of high quality liquid assets to cover net liquidity outflows during a 30- day period of stress.
= High quality liquid assets > = 100% Total net liquidity outflows
HIGH QUALITY LIQUID ASSETS-
a) Cash and deposits held with central banks to the extent that these deposits can be withdrawn in times of stress; b) Transferable assets that are of extremely high liquidity and credit quality; c) Transferable assets guaranteed by the central government or a third country if the institution incurs a liquidity risk in that third country that it covers by holding those liquid assets; Listed on a recognized exchange
Net liquidity outflows = Liquidity outflows - liquidity inflows in the stress scenario
Net stable funding ratio The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) requires institutions to maintain a sound funding structure over one year in an extended firm-specific stress scenario.
AVAILABLE STABLE FUNDING a) Own funds; items not included in the own funds: i) Retail deposits as defined in the Regulation; ii) All funding obtained from financial customers; iii) Funding from secured lending as specified in the Regulation;
(A Project of The Jewish People Policy Institute) Shalom Salomon Wald, Shimon Peres - Rise and Decline of Civilizations - Lessons For The Jewish People-Academic Studies Press (2014)