Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dve Decenije Ustavnosti U Srbiji
Dve Decenije Ustavnosti U Srbiji
329.1419/20)
POLITICAL REVIEW
(XXIV) XI, vol=32
. 2 / 2012.
. 219-244.
**
(19902010)
.
.
,
. ,
. ,
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
: , ,
, , , ,
, ,
,
.
* , ,
** . 179009
, .
- 219 -
...
I.
.
, XIX
, .
() .
, -
, .
,
, ,
.
.
(1990. 2006. ),
1992.
(2003).
.
, ,
.
.
- .
,
.
.
.
, ( ,
, , ,
...).
- 220 -
: 219-244.
.1) , ,
.
,
.
, ( ,
, ).2)
,
.3)
,
(
).
.
,
.
.
II.
1. 1990.
, 1990.
.
,
.
, .
,
, a 2006. .
1)
2)
3)
- 221 -
...
1990.
.
, ,
,
. ,
,
XX . ,
, .
, .
- ,
. ,
. .
,
,
.
.
.
80- .
.
-
.4)
. ,
, (
, )
.
4)
: . (.),
, , , 1990;
. (.), ,
, , 1991.
,
.
, ,
,
.
- 222 -
: 219-244.
.
- .
,
,
.
, .
, 1974.
.
,
.5)
.
,
1989. .
,
,
. ,6)
,7) ,
1990.
1990. .8)
5)
6)
7)
8)
, ,
.
, . , ,
, .
differentia specifica .
.
( 1988. ) ,
1989. . ,
.
,
(sic!). ,
.
,
.
.
.
2. 1990. ,
(7. 1990. ) .
1991. , 1992. .
: Ustavni amandmaji k Ustavi Soclialistine republike Slovenije IXXC, Uredni list
RS, t. 32/89; Ustavni amandmaji k Ustavi Soclialistine republike Slovenije XCIXCV,
- 223 -
...
,
(ius nullificationis ius secessi
onis).
,
.9)
.
,10) .
. 1990.
,
.
,
.
,
. ,
.
,
.
.
,
.
,
,
.
.
1. 2. 1990.
,
.11)
Uredni list RS, t. 6/90; Deklaracija o suverenosti drave Republike Slovenije, Uredni
list RS, t. 26/90.
9) 1990. .
10) : . , . , . 120.
11) .
:
?.
.
- 224 -
: 219-244.
,
. .
,
.12) ,
.
,
.13)
28. 1990. ,
9. 23. .
,
.
.
,
. ,
. - ,
.
.14)
2.
,
,
.
.
. ,
.
12) 16. 18. 1990. .
.
13) . , .: . , ...
( , , , . 20; .
, (1990-1994), , . 6/1994, . 7;
. , : ,
, . 1/1995, , , 1995, . 7.
14) : . , -
2006. : . , . (.), ,
, , 2010, . 412.
- 225 -
...
,
. ,
,
.
contradictio in adiectio. (19681992) (1949-1971). ,
.15)
27. 1992. .
, ,
.
1990.
.
,
.
.
,
1974. ,
, .
,
.16)
,
.
,
15) ( ) ( )
. , ,
. ,
. ,
.
16)
1991. .
.
: ;
;
.
- 226 -
: 219-244.
1992. , .17)
.
12.
1992. .18) , ,
.
,
.
, .19)
, , 28.
13. 1992. .20)
, ,
. , ,
.
. ,
.21)
1974. (. 398-403).
. 73 ,
17)
. .
, , ,
, , 1995, . 125.
18) . , . , . 11.
19) 1. 1992. . :
, ,
- , .
,
, .
20) . , , ,
, , 2007, . 76.
21) . , . , . 129; . , ? -
(1990-1994), : , ,
6, , , , 2006,
. 378; . , , , ,
, 1994, . 109.
- 227 -
...
220 .
1990. ,
.
, .
,
,
.
, .
,
.
.22)
,
.
. ,
,
.23)
,
, .
,
.
,
,
, ,
.24)
.
,
.
.
22) .
,
.
23) , ,
. 65.000 ,
30 . ,
. :
. , . , . 371.
24) . , . , . 366.
- 228 -
: 219-244.
,
.25)
,
.
1992. ,
, 1999. .
,
.
,
. (
)
.
1998.
,
.
, (
1999. , 2002. ).
. ,
,
.
.
2000. ,
.
26)
.27) ,
25) , -,
, .
: . , ,
, , 1939, . 36-37.
26) ,
( V). VI VII
.
.
.
,
27) : , . 29/00; III
,
, . 32/00.
- 229 -
...
.
2000.
.28)
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
2001. ,
.
. 8. 2000.
,
.
3.
2000.
.
,
, .
,
.
,
,
.
. ,
2000. ,
.
28) : . , . ,
- , 1990-2010, , ,
2011, . 355.
- 230 -
: 219-244.
(
) ( ).
, -
,
. .
( )
( )
2001. 2002. .
.
,
2000. .
,
.
,
.
. ,
(
-) -
. , ,
,
.
, - ,
. , .
14. 2002. . ,
,
.
, ,
. ,
- 231 -
...
1999. , ,
.
,
, ,29)
() .30)
.
. , -
.
.
,
(
)
, -
.
,
,
.
,
,
,
.31) ,
,
.
, ,
,
140. 141.
.
29)
.
30)
, . ,
, , , 2007, . 160.
31) . , , ,
, 2012, . 146.
- 232 -
: 219-244.
,
2001. ,
, .32)
.33)
,
. ,
(sic!),
.
,
.
(
, ).
,
-.
.
1244 .
,
.34)
32) , -
30. 2001.
.
.
: http://pregled-rs.com/article.php?pid=170&id=16711&name=Polazne (,
29. 2012).
33) , ,
3. 2002.
. :
, http://www.zorandjindjic.org/con
tent/govor-dr-zorana-%C4%91in%C4%91i%C4%87-u-saveznoj-skup%C5%A1tini-2?for
mat=simple ( 24. 2012)
34) :
,
, .
- 233 -
...
,
,
.
,
.
. ,
( )
.
,
- . ,
.
4. 2003. ,35)
28.
2003. .36) : , ,
;
.
,
.
, ,
, .
,
,
1244 ,
.
- -
, -
. -
(),
, .
35) ,
, . 1/03. ,
1830. .
,
2003. , .
36)
.
( ,
. 6/03).
- 234 -
: 219-244.
,
.
( ),
.
.
, ,
126 , 91 35 .
,
.
.
.
, .
,
, .
,
.
: , ,
,
.
,
( 42).
.
,
. , ,
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
- 235 -
...
.
, .
,
- .37)
( )
( ).
.38)
2005. .
,39)
.
.
, (12.
).40)
,
,
.41) 3.
. 29. 2005.
37) ,
(. , .
, . 147). ,
, ,
. . , . ,
, , ,
, , 2011, . 102.
38) : Pajvani Marijana, Krenje Ustavne povelje dravne zajednice Srbija i Crna
Gora, Pravni ivot, br. 12/2005, Beograd, . 1105-1123.
39) 2005. ,
.
40) : http://www.srbija.gov.rs/vesti/
dokumenti_sekcija.php?id=25039 ( 7. 2011); : . ,
,
, , 2008, . 186.
41) . , . , . 147.
- 236 -
: 219-244.
. ,
21. 2006. ,42)
.
.
4. 2006.
,
2006. .
, .
,
. , ,
1990. .
,
. ,
,
. ,
.
2006.
. ,
,
1990. , .
. ,
.43) , ,
.
-
,
.44)
,
.
.
42) 419.240 (86,5% ).
230.661 (55,5%),
185.002 (44,4%).
43) : . , ,
, , , 2010, . 48-49.
44) : , , 2004, . 7-8.
- 237 -
...
. ,
1990. ,
.45)
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
. ,
.
,
. ,
,
( )
, ,
.
,
.
, ,
.
,
30. 2006. .
,
.
, .46)
. 54,91%
, 53,04% .
45) . , . , 2000.
, , , 2007, . 214.
46) : , , . 48/94
11/98.
- 238 -
: 219-244.
,
.
( ).
,
.
. 1990.
, .
.
,
.
(. ) .
III.
.47)
. ,
, 2006.
.
,
.
,
.
.
.
, .
47) ,
,
, .
- 239 -
...
. ,
,
. , 1990.
,
.
, .
,
.
,
. ,
.
.
.
.
. ,
.
, ,
.
( ) 2006.
( ).
,
.
. ,
.
2006. ,
. ,
.
.
,
- 240 -
: 219-244.
.
,
.
Miodrag Radojevic
TWO DECADES IN SERBIA CONSTITUTIONALITY
- Constitutions of the emergency (1990-2010)
Summary
In this text author analyzed modern period in develop
ment of Serbian constitutionality. The author started the
analysis from the point of methodological matrix by which
the constitutional order is a complex product of social and
historical processes. In accord with a theory of constitu
tionalism the author analyzed political circumstances and
formal-legal character of the procedure of adoption of the
Constitution and underlined its substantial deficiencies.
In case of Serbia it is possible to notice that the consti
tutions are the constitutions in the state of emergency.
In contrast to other transitional states, Serbia faced more
complex demands (challenges) regarding adoption of first
Constitution. The Constitution gained a role of an act for
articulation of democratization processes and also the
role of protection of the statehood. In such circumstances
it was more difficult to accomplish a constitutional formu
la and adopt the constitutions in accord with procedural
legitimacy. Main political factors treated the Constitu
tion issue within the context of the party-oriented politics,
which implied that the Constitution was not accepted as a
basic social contract.
Key Words: Constitution, constitutionality, constitutional
ism, legitimacy, the reign of law, federalism, state union
of Serbia and Crna Gora, European Union, constitutional
consensus, capacities of political institutions
, :
, , . 1/1995,
, , 1995, . 91-135.
, (1990-1994),
, . 6/1994, . 5-22.
, ,
, , 2007.
, ,
, , 2007.
- 241 -
...
, ,
, , 1939.
(.),
, , , 1990.
(.),
, , , 1991.
, ? -
(1990-1994), : ,
, 6, ,
, , 2006.
, ,
, , , 2007,
Linc Huan - Alfred Stepan, Demokratska tranzicija i konsolidacija, Filip
Vinji, 1995.
, , ,
,
, , , 2011.
, ,
, 1990-2010,
, , 2011.
, ,
, ,
2012.
, ,
, ,
, 2010
, ,
, , , 1994.
, ...
, , , 2003.
,
, , , 2008.
, ,
2000. , ,
, 2007.
Pajvani Marijana, Krenje Ustavne povelje dravne zajednice Srbija i
Crna Gora, Pravni ivot, br. 12/2005, Beograd, . 1105-1123.
,
2006. : . , . (.),
, ,
, 2010, . 411-428.
Fridrih Karl, Konstitucionalna demokratija, CID, Podgorica, 2005.
, ,
, , , 1995
, , .
1/90.
, , .
98/06.
,
, . 1/92.
- 242 -
: 219-244.
,
, . 1/03.
28. 2003. , , . 6/03.
, http://
www.pregled-rs.com/include/data/dlst0001.pdf
, , . 32/00.
,
, . 48/94 11/98.
Resume
Modern period of development of constitutionality in Ser
bia symbolically started with disintegration of doctrine
and practice of real-socialism. On global level transition
implied a change of ideological paradigm installment of
market economy, multiparty system and the reign of law.
New constitutions in post-communist states confirmed and
declaratively guarantied political reforms. In majority of
these states the way of adoption of the Constitution and its
frame were a result of the settlement between government
and opposition. Their recent history of constitutionalism
was not marked by frequent changed and conflicts regard
ing solution of the Constitution issue. However in Serbia
the constitutional process went on by different scenario.
Serbia independently adopted two republic Constitutions
(1990 and 2006) and participated together with Crna
Gora in adoption of federal Constitution (1992) and the
Constitutional Charter (2003). What these constitutional
acts had in common was the fact that they were all adopted
in the midst of unfavorable political circumstances. Un
regulated state status, Sisyphus-like work of preservation
of dysfunctional federation with Crna Gora, ethnical con
flicts of Serbian people in other republics and preservation
of territorial integrity and sovereignty influenced the pro
cess of bringing solution to the Constitution issue. During
last two decades Serbia was continually in an informal
state of emergency, which produced numerous negative
consequences to its overall economic and political devel
opment. Political energy was not directed toward solving
of the issue of development of democracy, but to solving of
national and state issue.
Aggravating circumstances in which the adoption and
change of the Constitution took place were objective mo
ments of this process. The Constitution of 1990 was ad
opted in circumstances of upcoming disintegration of Yu
- 243 -
...
- 244 -