IRJC

International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research

Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

1
8


AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON CONSUMER PERCEPTION TOWARDS
BRANDED SHIRTS IN TRICHY CITY

MR. S.P. KARUPPASAMY PANDIAN*; S.P.NIVETHA VARATHANI**;
V.KEERTHIVASAN***

*Assistant Professor,
Department of Management Studies,
KPR School of Business ,
Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
**Saranathan College of Engineering,
Venkateswara Nagar, Panjappur,
Tiruchirappalli - 620012, Tamil Nadu, India.
***Saranathan College of Engineering,
Venkateswara Nagar, Panjappur,
Tiruchirappalli - 620012, Tamil Nadu, India.

ABSTRACT

India is witnessing change in life styles of large section of the population. The need to
understand the emerging markets and consumers has become a big challenge for the corporate
world especially in creating and managing a powerful brand. By developing a powerful brand,
corporate can establish 'brand equity' and the equity assists firms in a variety of ways to manage
competition and to maintain market share. Due to the globalization process, Indians are getting
attracted to readymade dresses, particularly Multinational brands. Buying behavior of men on
branded shirts is changing one. Number of people visits the showroom with a brand in mind
because the quality and comfort of that brand are suitable for them. It becomes important for the
marketers to understand these relationships for successful design and execution of branding
strategies.

The present study investigates mens perception towards branded shirts and to ascertain the
brand of shirt most preferred by respondents in Trichy city. The study also examines consumers
perception towards retail garments showrooms in Trichy city. The study is a descriptive study.
Primary data was collected with the help of structured questionnaire administered to 215 male
respondents in Trichy city and the type of sampling was convenient sampling. Using statistical
package for social science for the following test was administered 1.Factor Analysis, 2.Multiple
Regression, and 3.Descriptive statistics. Pilot study was conducted and the necessary additions
and deletions were made in the questionnaire. To check the reliability and validity of the data
collected Cronbachs alpha test was administered and the value of Cronbachs alpha is 0.772.
Based on the test result some of the relevant finding were derived that will be use full to find the
factors that really influences mens towards particular brand of shirts. The manufactures can
come out with suitable strategies to overcome the problems.

KEYWORDS: Brand, Brand equity, buying behavior.
______________________________________________________________________________
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

1
9


INTRODUCTION

Brand management holds the key in the modern markets, particularly in Indian markets because
Indians are very traditional. India's traditional dress for men is Dhoti but gradually, people
transmitted into tailor made dresses. Due to the globalization process, Indians are getting
attracted to readymade dresses, particularly Multinational brands. The growth of readymade
mens wear business in India was very slow till the early 1980's. The main reason for this was
that Indian men were used to buying cloth and getting their outfits tailored mainly through local
tailoring shops from the unorganized segment. Consequently, there were no national level brands
in this category for a long period. By the mid 1980's however customer mindset seemed to have
started changing gradually, along with increasing urbanization, and changes in the social and
economic status and life styles. As in many other industries in the nation, the move towards
'branding' soon took momentum in the mens wear market. In this study, an attempt was made to
study the consumer perception towards branded shirts and retail garment showrooms of India.
Both listed and unlisted players cater to the branded apparel market. There are a small
number of listed players such as Chennai Silks, Sarathas Textiles, Raymond Show Room,
Bombay Dyeing, Nokada Show Room, Ahamed Brothers, Peter England, John player and Thaila
Silks. Popular unlisted players include Indigo Nation, Basic and Sting.
REASONS FOR BRANDING
It is an instrument for sales promotion in the market.
It facilitates easy advertisement and publicity
It creates special consumer preference over the product.
BRAND VALUE
Film Crimmins, Executive Vice-president of DDB Needham told that the key to ensure
brand Loyalty was to increase the value of the brand in the mind of the consumer, a task he said,
was easier said than done. Crimmins argued that more than sustained advertising to build value,
factors such as product improvements, package design, communicating the competitive positions
and promotion that deliver not only purchase incentives but also added value.
BUYING BEHAVIOR
Difference in customers habits, their cognitive structures and their motives cause them to
behave differently when buying. Although an individual doesnt act the same way in all
situations, people tend to act consistently, we may identify six groups of consumers by their
buying behavior.
A habit determined group of brand loyal consumers who tend to be satisfied with the
Product or brand last purchased.
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
0


A price cognitive group of consumers who decide principally upon the basis of price or
Economy comparison.
A cognitive group of consumers who are sensitive to rational claims
An impulse group of consumers who buy on the basis of physical appeal and are
relatively insensitive to brand name.
A group of emotional reactors who respond to product symbols and are heavily swayed
by images.
A group of new consumers who havent yet stabilized the psychological dimensions of
their behavior.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Lalitha et al., (2008) made a study entitled "Brand Preference of Mens wear". Scope of
the study focuses on the brand preference regarding shirts and pants of select consumers living in
twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad. It is confined to the customers visiting the select
showrooms in Hyderabad and Secunderabad. The objectives of this study were to know the
reason why customers prefer branded shirts and pants to unbranded ones, to find out the
influence of advertisement for branded clothing for the purchase behavior of the respondent and
to know the factors influencing customers while choosing branded shirts or pants. It is concluded
that educational qualifications, employment status, age group, convenience of shops, and
advertisement are influencing factors for purchasing the branded shirts and pants by the
respondents. 94percent of the respondents are highly educated and purchased branded ready
wears. Age group of 20-50 years is income earning people and spending on the branded wears.
The study reveals that the advertisements play a limited role to choose the brand among ready-
made dresses available in the market. 54percent of the customers are buying branded ready wear
because of quality and status symbol.
Ritu Narang (2006) in a study entitled A Study on Branded Mens wear, was taken up
in the city of Lucknow with an intention to explore the purchase behavior of the buyers of
branded mens wear. The objectives of this research are to study the purchase behavior of the
buyers of branded mens garments, to study the impact of advertising on the purchase decision of
buyers, to study the impact of promotional activities on purchase behavior of buyers (Kazmi,
2001;Mathur, 2002). The research type was exploratory as it was conducted to develop a concept
about the purchasing behavior of buyers of branded mens garments and the impact of
advertising on their purchase decision. This study concluded that most of the times buyers visit
the showrooms of branded garments with the purpose of shopping (Jaishri and Jethwaney, 1999).
The purchasing of branded garments is not impulsive. However, compared to women, male
buyers visit the showroom for passing the time; The number of people visiting the showroom
with a brand in mind is same as the number of people visiting the showroom with no brand in
mind; Advertising has maximum impact in creating brand awareness (Kamalaveni, 2008).

IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
1


Pathak and Tripathi (2009) made a study entitled Customer Shopping Behavior among
Modem Retail Formats: A Study of Delhi & NCR. The Study is an exploratory research
conducted in Delhi & NCR. It specifically focuses on customer shopping behavior in Indian
scenario among the modern retail formats (Sumathi, 2003). Objectives of the study are to find
out the factors that affect the buyer's decisions among the modern retail formats and to evaluate
the comparative strength of these factors in buying decision of the buyers.
On the basis of primary as well as secondary research the authors note that retailers often
over look the schemes and offerings expected by the customers and tried to impose their own
offerings upon customers which ultimately cause the dissatisfaction (Fornell, et al., 2006; 2009).
It is also observed that in the changing retailing environment, understanding the psyche of a
customer is critical for success in retailing. Aggregate level picture may be misleading, as it
averages the beats and the valleys. Hence, Individual understanding is desirable (Mishra, 2009).
It is further stated that the Indian customers have become more sensitive to quality, customer
service and status. She/he is ready to pay, sometimes, astronomical sums, provided their needs
are satisfied. They are basically looking for an experience which is more of cognitive than
physical (Biplab, (1998).
Today's young consumers are inclined more towards leading a comfortable and hassle
free life. They have come in possession of money and wish to spend it on trusted goods and
services, which are well worth the money that they would pay. 'Brands' cost them dearly and yet,
they prefer the same as they are conscious of the fact that branded products give them their
money's worth. This generation of consumers may, therefore, be labeled as 'the brand conscious
generation (Sherlaker, 1995). Raymonds, Amul and Bata are trusted brands. The problem is that
when they started they were pioneers in their line, whereas today, there are multiple brands that
are able to deliver the same quality at a lower price perhaps. Unless they reinvent themselves and
remain relevant, they cannot sustain.
The Article entitled The Recipe for the success of Garment Industry highlights that
Segmentation Targeting Poisoning (STP) is an important strategic tool in business, where in
customers are grouped together based on some common traits (segmenting), business analysis is
done for these segments to identify viable segment(s) (targeting) and the firm positions its
marketing offer to appeal to the targeted segment(s) so that the identified segment resonates to
the offering (positioning). Because of the universalization of common production technologies
and quality standards, differences in various products and services are getting blurred. At the
same time, customers are quite demanding and would want their specific needs to be addressed.
Thus, firms will have to configure what customers want, rather than being product centric. This
trend makes the customer segments smaller and smaller and poses a challenge to make each
cluster a viable segment.
Simintiras, Anotonis (1997) attempt to distinguish evaluation outcomes of likely future
satisfaction from feelings or emotions prior to the act of purchase, and assess the impact of
prepurchase satisfaction on the purchase behavior of first time buyers. In their study after
conceptualizing prepurchase satisfaction as the emotional outcome of anticipated satisfaction, it
was hypothesized that; Prepurchase satisfaction and anticipated satisfaction are related but
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
2


distinct constructs; And prepurchase satisfaction levels are higher for potential first time buyers
who buy than those who do not buy. The results provided support for both propositions, and
suggest that anticipated satisfaction and prepurchase satisfaction are distinguishable constructs,
and prepurchase satisfaction is a predictor of the purchase behavior of first time buyers. Shainesh
(2004) presents that buying behavior in a business market is characterized by long cycle times,
group decision making, participants from different functional areas and levels and sometimes
divergent objectives, and changing roles of the participants during the buying cycle.
Jayashree (1998) says In the matter of textiles, the consumer prefers a wide variety of
fabrics to choose them, and their preferences changes according to the season and geographical
areas2. Consumer taste is a controlling factor in determining the character of goods that appears
in the market. A rational approach to clothing needs and expenditure makes the consumer more
effective participate in entire market economy. Gender has been identified in much literature on
consumer shopping behavior as a significant factor in understanding consumer behavior and as a
fundamental market segmentation index for companies to meet their customers needs and
wants; Marketers should strive to understand the gender differences in decision-making styles.
Research addressing the issue of gender differences in decision-making styles could help
marketers to find better ways of communicating with both sexes and to guide marketing mix
decisions (Mitchell and Walsh, 2004). Marketing scholars argue that gender based segmentation,
especially if it is based on biological sex per se, meets several of the requirements for successful
implementation: the segments were easy to identify, easy to access, and large enough for
consumer products and services to be marketed profitably3&4. Numerous studies in the past
have provided considerable evidence that gender relates to consumers perceptions, attitudes,
preferences and purchase decisions (Bakewell and Mitchell 2006; Sproles and Kendall, 1986;
Canabal, 2001).
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
To ascertain the brand of shirt most preferred by respondents.
To study the factors that are influencing mens towards branded shirts.
To examine consumers perception towards retail garments showrooms and factor they
considered to choose a particular retail garments showroom for their shopping in Trichy
city.
HYPOTHESES
Hypothesis 1: There is a relationship among the factors that influence customer
perception toward branded shirts.
Hypothesis 2: Convenient store hours and offers & discounts can predict the overall
satisfaction of consumers towards retail garments showroom.

IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
3


RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study is a descriptive study. Primary data was collected with the help of structured
questionnaire administered to 215 male respondents in Trichy city and the type of sampling was
convenient sampling. Pilot study was conducted and the necessary additions and deletions were
made in the questionnaire.
SCALING DESIGN
Likert scale is being adapted to measure a quantity consumer perception towards
branded shirts and retail garments showroom. Five point scales have been used for the study.
STATISTICAL TOOLS USED
Multiple regressions
Factor analysis
Descriptive statistics
Reliability analysis
RELIABILITY STATISTICS
TABLE - 1
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.772 39

An examination had been made from the reliability of the data to check whether random
error causing inconsistency and in turn lower reliability is at a manageable level or not, by
running reliability test. From table 1 it is clear that the values of coefficient Alpha (Cronbachs
Alpha) have been obtained, the minimum value of coefficient Alpha obtained was .772. This
shows data has satisfactory internal consistency reliability.
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
4


DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
TABLE - 2
Brand Mean Rank
Raymond 2.58 1
Peter England 3.61 2
John player 4.51 3
Louis Philippe 4.90 4
Basics 5.60 6
Arrow 5.09 5
Indigo nation 6.67 7
Zero 7.89 9
Sting 8.36 10
Allensolly 6.67 7
Others 10.79 11

An examination had been made to rank the most preferred branded shirts by employing
descriptive statistics. From the above table 2 it is clear that Raymond (Rank 1), peter England
(Rank 2), and john player (Rank 3) are the most preferred top three brands of mens shirts in
Trichy city. Remaining brands (Louis Philippe, Basics, Arrow, Indigo nation, Zero, and sting)
are preferred next to the top three brands.
FACTOR ANALYSIS
Hypothesis 1: there is a relationship among the factors that influence customer perception
toward branded shirts.
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
5


TABLE 3: KMO AND BARTLETT'S TEST
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.
.607
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 793.622
Df 190
Sig. .000

KMO measure of sampling adequacy is an index to examine the appropriateness of factor
analysis. High values 0.5 and 1.0 indicate factor analysis is appropriate. Values below 0.5 imply
that factor analysis may not be appropriate. From the above table it is seen that Kaiser-Meyer-
olkin measure of sampling adequacy index is 0.607 and hence the factor analysis is appropriate
for the given data set. Bartletts test of Sphericity is used to uncorrelated. It is based on chi-
square transformation of the determinant of correlation matrix. A large value hypothesis. In turn
this would indicate that factor analysis is appropriate. Bartletts test of Sphericity Chi-square
statistics is 793.622, that shows the 20 statements are correlated and hence as inferred in KMO,
factor analysis is appropriate for the given data set.
TABLE 4: TOTAL VARIANCE EXPLAINED
Compone
nt
Initial Eigen values
Extraction Sums of
Squared Loadings
Rotation Sums of Squared
Loadings
Tota
l
% of
Varianc
e
Cumulati
ve %
Tota
l
% of
Varianc
e
Cumulati
ve %
Tota
l
% of
Varianc
e
Cumulati
ve %
1 3.30
1
16.507 16.507
3.30
1
16.507 16.507
2.34
8
11.741 11.741
2 2.29
7
11.483 27.989
2.29
7
11.483 27.989
2.01
7
10.086 21.827
3 1.68
5
8.427 36.417
1.68
5
8.427 36.417
1.98
8
9.942 31.769
4 1.57
8
7.888 44.304
1.57
8
7.888 44.304
1.95
0
9.749 41.518
5 1.45
3
7.267 51.572
1.45
3
7.267 51.572
1.61
1
8.055 49.573
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
6


6 1.20
5
6.027 57.599
1.20
5
6.027 57.599
1.60
5
8.026 57.599
7 .992 4.960 62.558
8 .951 4.753 67.312
9 .865 4.323 71.635
10 .827 4.135 75.770
11 .735 3.677 79.447
12 .686 3.431 82.878
13 .643 3.217 86.095
14 .551 2.756 88.852
15 .491 2.457 91.308
16 .466 2.330 93.639
17 .355 1.774 95.413
18 .345 1.723 97.137
19 .297 1.483 98.620
20 .276 1.380 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Eigen value represents the total variance explained by each factor. Percentage of the total
variance attributed to each factor. One of the popular method used exploratory factor analysis in
principle component analysis, where the total variance in the data is considered to determine the
minimum number of factors that will account for maximum variance of data depicted.
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
7


TABLE 5: ROTATED COMPONENT MATRIX (A)

Component
1 2 3 4 5 6
Price range .005 -.127 -.039 .120 .757 .001
Status symbol .498 -.206 -.076 .137 -.013 .200
Quality .656 .045 .082 .438 -.115 -.127
Durability .747 .110 .189 -.128 -.055 -.152
Reliability .731 .138 -.054 .126 .037 .093
Availability .149 .666 .102 .190 .229 -.167
Attractiveness .098 -.081 .153 .788 .055 -.008
Uniqueness .176 -.154 .634 .369 .154 -.109
Different style .026 .096 .311 .427 .258 -.064
Life style .190 -.129 .516 .345 -.468 .030
Wider choice of color
and design
.131 .342 .647 -.001 -.045 -.027
Smart look and
comfort
.168 .337 -.103 .668 -.189 .107
Fashion -.236 .021 -.112 .324 .100 .562
Reference group .011 .742 .015 -.035 -.102 .154
Official purpose -.117 .600 .447 .096 -.012 -.020
Offers/Discounts -.104 .254 .307 -.087 .550 .119
Advertisement -.190 .183 .617 -.059 .153 .317
Celebrity endorser .175 -.180 .112 -.058 .065 .773
Washing machine
washable
.103 .390 .056 -.149 -.061 .631
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
8


Brand image .525 -.043 .064 -.009 .513 .101
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
A Rotation converged in 12 iterations.
Interpretation of factors is facilitated by indentifying the statements that have large
loading in the same factor. The factor can be interpreted in terms of the statement that loads high
on it.
The factors of a consumer perception towards branded shirts comprise of 20 individual
statements. Out of 20 factors, 6 individual factors contribute more towards consumer perceptions
towards retail hypermarket. The factors are:
1. Durability
2. Reference groups
3. Wider choice of color and design
4. Attractive
5. Price range
6. Celebrity endorser
MULTIPLE REGRESSION
HYPOTHESIS 2: Convenient store hours and offers & discounts can predict the overall
satisfaction of consumers towards retail garment showroom.
TABLE 6: MODEL SUMMARY
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square
Std. Error of the
Estimate
1 .899(a) .808 .789 .181

a Predictors: (Constant), Convenience store hours, Store ambience, Price range, Value
added services, Parking facilities, Facility for use of credit card, Product display and demo,
Several brands to choose, Hospitality, Better customer service, Design and material, Close to
where you live, Store comfortable to shop in, Security, Wider choice of color, Offers and
discount, Salesmanship and courtesy, Fast billing, Location of shops
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

2
9


The above model summary table shows R-square for this model is 0.808. This means that
80.8% of the variation in overall satisfaction of consumers (dependent variable) can be explained
from the 19 independent variables. The table also shows the adjusted R-square for the model as
0.789.
Anytime another independent variable is added to a multiple regression model, the R-
square will increase (even if only slightly). Consequently, it becomes difficult to determine
which models do the best job of explaining variation in the same dependent variable. The
adjusted R-square does just what its name implies. This adjustment allows the easy comparison
of the explanatory power of models with different numbers of predictors variable. Its also helps
us to decide how many variables to include in our regression model.
TABLE 7: COEFFICIENTS (A)
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 5.342 .482 11.086 .000
Location of shops -.231 .041 -.676 -5.684 .000
Salesmanship and
courtesy
-.332 .056 -.603 -5.910 .000
Wider choice of color .176 .041 .473 4.237 .000
Design and material -.472 .055 -.739 -8.625 .000
Price range -.019 .043 -.042 -.438 .662
Offers and discount .310 .050 .569 6.170 .000
Facility for use of credit
card
-.180 .027 -.545 -6.550 .000
Parking facilities -.139 .055 -.320 -2.501 .013
Store comfortable to
shop in
.026 .048 .043 .543 .588
Security .074 .041 .170 1.833 .068
Close to where you live -.025 .039 -.055 -.652 .515
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

3
0


Several brands to
choose
-.199 .058 -.380 -3.426 .001
Product display and
demo
-.101 .046 -.184 -2.210 .028
Store ambience .145 .052 .214 2.805 .006
Fast billing .075 .037 .228 2.024 .044
Value added services -.002 .040 -.005 -.044 .965
Hospitality -.196 .042 -.420 -4.707 .000
Better customer service -.039 .030 -.083 -1.330 .185
Convenience store
hours
.348 .042 .735 8.196 .000
A Dependent Variable: satisfaction with showroom
To determine if one or more of the independent variables are significant predictors of
overall satisfaction of consumer, we examine the information provided in the coefficient table.
From the above 19 independent statements only 8 statements are not statistically significant. The
standardized coefficient beta column reveals the Location of Shops has a beta coefficient -.676,
which is significant (.000). Salesman ship & Courtesy has a beta coefficient -.603, which is
significant (.000). Wider choice in Color has a beta coefficient .569, which is significant (0.000).
Design & Material has a beta coefficient -.739, which is significant (0.000). Price range has a
beta significant -.042, which is not significant (.662). Offers and discounts have a beta
coefficient -.473, which is significant (0.000). Facility for use of credit card has a beta coefficient
-.545, which is significant (0.000). Parking facilities has a beta coefficient -.320, which is not
significant (0.013). Store comfortable to shop in has a beta coefficient .043, which is not
significant (0.588). Security has a beta coefficient .170, which is not significant (0.068). Close to
where you live has a beta coefficient -.055, which is significant (0.515). Several brands to choose
have a beta coefficient -.380, which is significant (0.001). Product display and demo has a beta
coefficient --.184, which is not significant (0.028). Store ambience has a beta coefficient .214,
which is not significant (0.006). Fast billing has a beta coefficient .228, which is not significant
(0.044).hospitality has a beta coefficient -.420, which is significant (0.000) Value added services
has a beta coefficient -.005, which is not significant (0.965). Better customer service has a beta
coefficient -.083, which is not significant (0.185). A convenience store hour has a beta
coefficient .735, which is significant (0.000). from the above table we can able to know that
offers & discounts and convenient store hours are having major impact in the minds of the
consumer and brings them lot of satisfaction when compared with other factors in preferring
particular retail garment showroom.
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

3
1


CONCLUSION
The study reveals that Raymond, Peter England, and John player remains the top three
brands preferred by the respondents. It is clear that most of the shoppers of mens branded shirts
were highly influenced by the factors such as durability, reference groups, wider choice of color
and design, attractiveness, price range and celebrity endorser. Most of the customers are
expecting reduced price and wider choice of color and design. The manufacturers of branded
shirts must focus on all these factors to formulate branding strategies effectively and to sustain
their growth. Convenient shop hours and the offer & discounts are the two factors that contribute
more to prefer a particular retail garment showroom. The retailers need to give more attention to
these factors in order to attract and retain their customers.
REFERENCES
Bakewell, C. and Mitchell, V. W. (2006). Male versus female consumer decision making.
Journal of Business Research, 59, 12971300.
Biplab, S. B. (1998). Hand Book of Marketing Management, Himalaya Publishing House,
Bombay, 1
st
Edition.
Canabal, M. E. (2001). Decision making styles of young South Indian consumers: An
exploratory study. College Student Journal, 36(1), 1219.
Fornell, C., S. Mithas, and F.V. Morgeson III (2009). "The Economic and Statistical Significance
of Stock Returns on Customer Satisfaction," Marketing Science, 28(5), 820825.
Fornell, C., S. Mithas, F.V. Morgeson III, and M.S. Krishnan (2006). Customer Satisfaction and
Stock Prices: High Returns, Low Risk, Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 314
Jaishri, N. Jethwaney, (1999). Advertising, Phoenix Publishing House, New Delhi, 1
st
Edition.
Jayashree, Y. (1998).Consumer behavior and fashion. Textile trends. 40:3343.
Kamalaveni. D., Kalaiselvi, S. and Rajalakshmi, S. (2008). Brand Loyalty of Women consumers
with respect to FMCGs. Indian Journal of Marketing, 38(9), PP. 4450.
Kazmi. S.H.H. (2001). Advertising and Sale Promotion, Excel Books, New Delhi, 1
st
Edition.
Lalitha. A., Ravikumar, J.and Padmavali, K. (2008). Brand preference of Men Wear. Indian
Journal of Marketing, 38(10), pp.3336
Mathur. V.C.(2002). Advertising Management, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi,
1st edition.
Mishra, Sita (2009).New Retail Models in India: Strategic Perspective Analysis, Journal of
Marketing and Communication, Dec. 2008, Vol 4, No.2,pp. 3947.
IRJC
International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research
Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622




w
w
w
.
i
n
d
i
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
c
o
m

3
2


Mitchell, V. and Walsh, G. (2004). Gender differences in German consumer decision-making
styles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(4), 331346.
Pathak. S.V. and Aditya P. Tripathi., (2009). Consumer shopping behaviour among Modern
Retail Formats: A Study of Delhi & NCR. Indian Journal of Marketing, 39(2), PP. 312.
Ritu Narang, (2006). A Study on Branded Men Wear. Indian Journal of Marketing, 6(11), PP. 39
Shainesh, (2004). Understanding buying behaviour, International Journal of Technology
Management, , Vol 28 issue 1, pp 118 127.
Sherlaker. S.A.(1995). Marketing Management, Himalaya Publishing House, Bombay, and 1st
Edition.
Simintiras, (1997).Prepurchase satisfaction and first time buying behavior, European Journal of
Marketing, Vol 31 issue 11/12, pp 737872.
Sproles G. B. and Kendall, E. L. (1986). A methodology for profiling consumers decision-
making styles. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 20(2), 267279.
Sumathi.S.(2003). Marketing Research and Consumer Behavior, Vikas Publishing House, 1
st

Edition.