Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Non Perfoming Assets Bank Project Report Finance
Non Perfoming Assets Bank Project Report Finance
!
o
t
a
k
"
a
#
i
n
d
r
a
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
$
%
I
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
&
e
s
B
a
n
k
2003-04
2004-05
2005-0'
BABASAB PATIL 36
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
,nterpretation: As we seen in grap" I*I*I Bank Ltd& 'perating Profit is increasing year
by year followed by .9:* Bank Ltd&
BABASAB PATIL 3,
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
Performance comparison of Ne! Private Sector "an#s Provisions and
.ontingencies of B years
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
B
a
n
k
o
f
P
a
n
j
a
b
L
t
d
*
C
e
n
t
u
r
i
o
n
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
*
H
D
F
C
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
I
C
I
C
I
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
I
n
d
u
s
i
n
d
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
!
o
t
a
k
"
a
#
i
n
d
r
a
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
$
%
I
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
&
e
s
B
a
n
k
2003-04
2004-05
2005-0'
,nterpretation:
I*I*I Bank Ltd making large Provisions for losses compares to .9:* Bank Ltd and 8TI
Bank Ltd may be beca#se of t"eir credit wort"iness&
BABASAB PATIL 3?
S No Banks Provisions and *ontingencies < in *rore=
+55052 +55253 +55356
! Bank of Pan/ab LtdU 66 ?!
+ *ent#rion Bank LtdU !!, 6 65
0 .9:* Bank Ltd 2A? 6,? !!5?
2 I*I*I Bank Ltd ?22 A3! +!3!
3 Ind#sind Bank Ltd& !?0 !A! !??
6 Qotak @a"indra Bank Ltd& 2? 2A A+
, 8TI Bank Ltd 2+5 +0! 35A
? Ges Bank 5 22
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
BABASAB PATIL 3A
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
Performance comparison of Ne! Private Sector "an#s Net Profit B years
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
B
a
n
k
o
f
P
a
n
j
a
b
L
t
d
*
C
e
n
t
u
r
i
o
n
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
*
H
D
F
C
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
I
C
I
C
I
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
I
n
d
u
s
i
n
d
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
!
o
t
a
k
"
a
#
i
n
d
r
a
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
$
%
I
B
a
n
k
L
t
d
&
e
s
B
a
n
k
2003-04
2004-05
2005-0'
,nterpretation:
I*I*I Bank Ltd and .9:* Bank LT9 Net Profit is Increasing >ven t"o#g" lot of @oney
"as spent on Provision and *ontingency& It may be beca#se of t"eir risk taking ability&
BABASAB PATIL 65
S No Banks Net Profit <in *rore=
+55052 +55253 +55356
! Bank of Pan/ab LtdU 0, <6!=
+ *ent#rion Bank LtdU <!53= +3 ??
0 .9:* Bank Ltd 3!5 666 ?,!
2 I*I*I Bank Ltd !60, +553 +325
3 Ind#sind Bank Ltd& +6+ +!5 0,
6 Qotak @a"indra Bank Ltd& ,A ?3 !!?
, 8TI Bank Ltd +,? 003 2?3
? Ges Bank <2= 33
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
Analysis of aove data:
As we see t"e above grap"s) I*I*I Bank Ltd 'perating Profit is increasing year
by year followed by .9:* Bank Ltd& 8TI Bank Ltd 'perating Profit is decreased in
+55253 b#t its s#ddenly increased to AA2crore in +553+556& B#t Bank of Pan/ab Ltd
'perating Profit for +55052 is !50 crore b#t s#ddenly it decreases to !A crore !n +552
53) t"en it amalgamated wit" *ent#rian Bank 7"ose 'perating Profit is *omparatively
Low in +55052 and +55253 after amalgamation it increases to !2?crore& >ven Ind#sind
Bank Ltd 'perating Profit is go on 9ecreasing and as Ges Bank is very new so initially it
"ad made loss of 2crore b#t made AAcrore operating profit in +55356&
Provisions and *ontingencies made by I*I*I Bank Ltd and .9:* Bank Ltd is
*omparatively "ig" it may be beca#se of risk taking ability and "ave strong financial
backgro#nd wit" more e%perience) And also t"ese banks are able to provide ade$#ate
finance to 9ifferent Sectors& As we seen 8TI Bank Ltd 'perating Profit in +55253
decreased and in +55356 increased so t"e Provisions made is low in +55253 b#t "ig" in
+55356 it may be beca#se of large advances made by bank in +55356& B#t Bank of
Pan/ab Ltd 'perating Profit gone down in +55253 to !Acrore b#t it "as inc#rred to make
?!crore Provisions and *ontingencies it may be beca#se of wrong Strategy made by bank
to provide finance and to maintain operating Profit) same sit#ation "as faced by
*ent#rion Bank Ltd in t"e year +55356& So only Bot"
Bank of Pan/ab Ltd and *ent#rion Bank Ltd Amalgamated to make strong finance
Backgro#nd& Ind#sind Bank 'perating Profit coming down year by year& Qotak
@a"indra is performing better eno#g" ne%t to I*I*I Bank) .9:* Bank) 8TI Bank& As
Ges Bank is new so initially it inc#rred 2crore loss so no provisions were made b#t it
made Provisions in +55356&
I*I*I Bank Ltd) .9:* Bank Ltd and 8TI Bank Ltd "ad comparatively "ig" Net
Profit it may be beca#se of risk taking ability and strong financial backgro#nd wit" more
e%perience& As "eavy Provisions were inc#rred by Bank of Pan/ab Ltd and *ent#rion
Bank Ltd till +55253 "ad amalgamated to make Positive Net profit and named
t"emselves as *ent#rion Bank of Pan/ab Ltd& Ind#sind Bank "ave to adopt different
strategy to increase net profit as it inc#rring loss from past 0 years&
BABASAB PATIL 6!
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
Analysis of /ross and Net NPA y ta#ing B years Advances paid y Ne! Private
Sector "an#%
"an# of Panja +td
"an#s /ross
Advances
/ross
NPA
/ross
NPA5I6
Net
Advances
Net
NPA
Net
NPA5I6
+55052 +,5A !6? 6&+5 +030 !+6 3&03
+55253 +3+5 !+6 3&55 +2!, !!+ 2&62
+55356 @ @ @
.enturion "an# +td
"an#s /ross
Advances
/ross
NPA
/ross
NPA5I6
Net
Advances
Net
NPA
Net
NPA5I6
+55052 !,53 ++! !+&A6 !336 6A 2&20
+55253 ++A! !36 6&?! +!A2 33 +&2A
+55356 6?2? 0!3 2&6 6300 ,2 !&!0
,ntrepretation:
As Bank of Pan/ab Ltd and *ent#rion Bank "as amalgamated in +553 September) so we
can see a decrease in Dross NPA from !+&A6E to 2&6E and Net NPA decreases to
!&!0E& 'f co#rse it is a good sign to t"e company as it came below 3E) beca#se if NPA
ratio of any Bank is more t"an 3E t"en it is said t"at t"e Banks need to adopt proper
strategy for recovery of debt&
BABASAB PATIL 6+
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
)D&. "an# +td
"an#s /ross
Advances
/ross
NPA
/ross
NPA5I6
Net
Advances
Net
NPA
Net
NPA5I6
+55052 !?562 006 !&?6 !,,23 +? 5&!6
+55253 +3A,6 20A !&6A +3366 6! 5&+2
+55356 0603, 35A !&25 0356! !33 5&22
,nterpretation:
:rom t"e above table we can see t"at Dross NPA of .9:* Bank Ltd "as decreasing from
!&?6 to !&25 from +55052 to +55356& T"is accomplis"ment is on acco#nt of credit
growt") w"ic" was "ig"er t"an t"e growt" of Dross NPA and not t"ro#g" appreciable
recovery of NPA& T"ere is neit"er red#ction nor even containment of t"e t"reat beca#se
as we seen increase in Net NPA from Past 0 years&
,.,., "an# +td
"an#s /ross
Advances
/ross
NPA
/ross
NPA5I6
Net
Advances
Net
NPA
Net
NPA5I6
+55052 63!56 0565 2&,5 62A2? !2+0 +&!A
+55253 A!A+5 0A+3 2&+, A!253 !353 !&63
+55356 !2?+55 +++0 !&35 !26!60 !530 5&,+
,nterpretation:
:rom above table we can see t"at Dross NPA of I*I*I Bank Ltd "as decreasing from
2&,5 to !&35 from +55052 to +55356& T"is accomplis"ment is on acco#nt of credit
growt") w"ic" was "ig"er t"an t"e growt" of Dross NPA and not t"ro#g" appreciable
recovery of NPA& T"ere is neit"er red#ction nor even containment of t"e t"reat& I*I*I
Bank Ltd is providing "ig" advances compare to ot"er banks in +553+556&
BABASAB PATIL 60
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
,ndusind "an# +td
"an#s /ross
Advances
/ross
NPA
/ross
NPA5I6
Net
Advances
Net
NPA
Net
NPA5I6
+55052 ,?2? +3A 0&0 ,05! +!+ +&A5
+55253 A5A0 0+! 0&30 A555 +22 +&,!
+55356 A0,6 +6A +&A5 A0!5 !A3 +&5A
,nterpretation:
Ind#sind Bank need to adopt strategy in red#cing NPA as its advances were more in
+55253 and also Dross NPA "as increased it may be beca#se of t"eir credit wort"& And
again it decreases Dross NPA in +55356 t"is #ps and down can affect credit wort"iness
of t"e bank&
1ota# 'ahindra "an# +td%
"an#s /ross
Advances
/ross
NPA
/ross
NPA5I6
Net
Advances
Net
NPA
Net
NPA5I6
+55052 +!53 +5 5&A3 +5A, 0 5&!2
+55253 253? +? 5&6A 25!, !3 5&0,
+55356 6030 0? 5&65 602A !3 5&+2
,nterpretation:
Qotak @a"indra Bank Ltd Net NPA is Increasing from +55052 to +55253 and again it
decreases to 5&+2 in +55356& it implied t"at NPA of Qotak @a"indra Bank are in #ps and
down it may be beca#se of any nat#ral calamities or c"ange in recovery meas#res etc&
b#t Dross NPA and Net NPA of Qotak @a"indra Bank is less t"an !E& So its good sign
to Bank&
-T, "an# +td
BABASAB PATIL 62
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
"an#s /ross
Advances
/ross
NPA
/ross
NPA5I6
Net
Advances
Net
NPA
Net
NPA5I6
+55052 A0?6 +,3 +&A0 A060 !!+ !&+5
+55253 !36+? 0!! !&AA !3650 +!, !&0A
+55356 ++255 0,2 !&,5 ++0!2 +!? 5&A?
,nterpretation
8TI Bank Ltd Dross and Net NPA "as decreases from +&A0 to !&,5 and !&+5 to 5&A?
respectively from +55052 to +55356& T"is accomplis"ment is on acco#nt of credit
growt") w"ic" was "ig"er t"an t"e growt" of Dross NPA and not t"ro#g" appreciable
recovery of NPA& T"ere is neit"er red#ction nor even containment of t"e t"reat&
Performance .omparison of Net NPA of Ne! Private Sector "an#s
Ne! PS"0s =99B@9C =99C@9D =99D@9A
Bank of Pan/ab LtdU
2&6A 2&62 5
BABASAB PATIL 63
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
*ent#rion Bank
LtdU
2&20 +&2A !&!0
.9:* Bank Ltd
5&!6 5&+2 5&22
I*I*I Bank Ltd
+&+! !&63 5&,+
Ind#sind Bank Ltd&
+&,+ +&,! +&5A
Qotak @a"indra
Bank Ltd&
5&!, 5&0, 5&+2
8TI Bank Ltd
!&+A !&0A 5&A?
Ges Bank
5 5 5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
Bank of Panjab
Ltd*
Centurion Bank
Ltd*
HDFC Bank Ltd
CC Bank Ltd
ndu!ind Bank
Ltd.
"otak #a$indra
Bank Ltd.
%& Bank Ltd
'e! Bank
,nterpretation:
:rom above c"art we can see t"at Bank of Pan/ab Ltd-s NPA increasing till it-s
amalgamated wit" *ent#rion Bank Ltd) and came nearer to 3E) after amalgamation bot"
Bank of Pan/ab Ltd and *ent#rion Bank Ltd named t"emselves as *ent#rion Bank of
BABASAB PATIL 66
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
Pan/ab Ltd& And in +55356 its NPA comes down !&!0E comparatively from previo#s
year NPA&
7e can say t"at .9:* Bank Ltd "as strong financial backgro#nd and credit
wort"iness so it can provide more advances to people and also it is efficient eno#g" to
recover t"ose advances so its Net NPA "as coming down and it is less t"an !E& So
.9:* is performing well&
In +55052 I*I*I Bank Ltd Net NPA is more b#t its declining slowly and came to
5&,+ from +&+! in +55356& it may be beca#se of its credit wort"iness and strong recovery
meas#res& I*I*I Bank Ltd is real risk taker so we cannot compare it wit" ot"er small
banks beca#se it providing "ig" advances compare to ot"er banks&
Ind#sind Bank Ltd Net NPA almost same for +55052 to +55253 and declines to
+&5A in +55356&
As Qotak @a"indra Bank Ltd providing comparatively low advances to avoid
credit risk so its NPA is low compare to ot"er Banks&
>ven 8TI Bank is performing well in recovering debts so its NPA came down
from previo#s year&
BABASAB PATIL 6,
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
,'PA.T (& NPA0S (N "AN1S? P*(&,TS AND +END,N/ P*(HESS:
KT"e efficiency of a bank is not always reflected only by t"e si(e of its balance
s"eet b#t by t"e level of ret#rn on its assets& NPA-s do not generate interest income for
t"e banks) b#t at t"e same time banks are re$#ired to make provisions for s#c" NPA-s
from t"eir c#rrent profits&
NPA-s "ave a deleterio#s effect on t"e ret#rn on assets in several ways
T"ey erode c#rrent profits t"ro#g" provisioning re$#irements
T"ey res#lt in red#ced interest income
T"ey re$#ire "ig"er provisioning re$#irements affecting profits and accretion to
capital f#nds and capacity to increase good $#ality risk assets in f#t#re) and
T"ey limit recycling of f#nds) set in assetliability mismatc"es) etc t"ere is at
times a tendency among some of t"e banks to #nderstate t"e level of NPA-s in
order to red#ce t"e provisioning and boost #p bottom lines& It wo#ld only
postpone t"e In t"e conte%t of crippling effect on a bank;s operations in all
sp"eres) asset $#ality "as been placed as one of t"e most important parameters in
t"e meas#rement of a bank;s performance #nder t"e *A@>LS s#pervisory rating
system of 1BI&
BABASAB PATIL 6?
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
.redit ris# path of the Ne! Private "an#0s y .omparing !ith selected F (ld PS"0s
using >uadrant Analysis%
.redit ris# path of the Ne! Private "an#0s:
Ne! Private
"an#s
NPA to Net
Advances
5 I6
Advances5crores6 >uadrant
analysis
=99D =99A =99D =99A =99D =99A
Bank of Pan/ab LtdU
2&62 +2!, .L
*ent#rion Bank LtdU
+&2A !&!0 +!A2 6300 .L .L
.9:* Bank Ltd
5&+2 5&22 +3366 0,66! L. L.
I*I*I Bank Ltd
!&63 5&,+ A!253 !26!60 L. L.
Ind#sind Bank Ltd&
+&,! +&5A A555 A0!5 .L .L
Qotak @a"indra Bank
Ltd&
5&0, 5&+2 25!, 602A LL LL
8TI Bank Ltd
!&0A
5&A? !3650 ++0!2 LL LL
,nterpretation
BABASAB PATIL 6A
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
.redit ris# path of the Ne! PS"0s: A >uadrant Analysis
In t"e c"art below an attempt is made to trace t"e relations"ip between NPA
proportion and t"e si(e of credit portfolio <advances= of New Private Bank-s& :or t"is
p#rpose proportion of gross NPA-s representing credit risk in"erent is taken on t"e F
a%is and gross credit levels are taken on t"e Ga%is& Since t"ese two parameters are
assets) w"ic" are stock concept variables) t"ey "ave been plotted on t"e basis of + years
+553 and +556 for a comparative analysis&
>-AD*ANT TA"+E@ =99D
L>4>L
*1>9IT L>4>L
NPA
L'7 <B>L'7 A4D=
<L=
.ID. <AB'4> A4D=
<.=
L'7
.ID.
LL <+=
.L <0=
L. <+=
.. <5=
>-AD*ANT TA"+E@ =99A
L>4>L
*1>9IT L>4>L
NPA
L'7 <B>L'7 A4D=
<L=
.ID. <AB'4> A4D=
<.=
L'7
.ID.
LL <+=
.L <+=
L. <+=
.. <5=
BABASAB PATIL ,5
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
As depicted in t"e tables) t"e banks are divided into 2 $#adrants namely LL) L.)
.L and .. <t"e fig#res are arrived at by taking t"e averages=& T"e average of NPA-s for
t"e year +553 is !&A0E and t"is fig#re is meas#red against eac" bank) any percentage
above t"is fig#re falls in t"e . category and percentage below !&A0E falls in t"e L
category& T"e same applies wit" t"e advances& T"e average of advances for +553 is
+!)23, crores and 0,)6++ crores for +556& T"e average of NPA for +556 is 5&A0E& SL-
represents low or below average of t"e New Private Bank-s and) S.- represents "ig" or
above average& >&g& w"ile LL means low in credit si(e and low in NPA-s) L. implies low
in NPA and .ig" in credit si(e& T"e following facts are visible from t"e $#adrant tableH
<6&As depicted in t"e tables) most of t"e new private banks fall in t"e .L $#adrant& In
+553 t"ere were 0 banks) w"ic" was + in +556& As seen in t"e $#adrants) t"e NPA was
"ig" compared to its credit si(e and t"e credit si(e is low in t"e New Sector Banks it
mig"t be beca#se t"ese banks "esitate to take risk and improper recovery meas#res&
=6&T"ere was + banks in t"e LL $#adrant in +553 w"ic" remain same in +556 also& It
means NPA Level and *redit si(e is low&
B6& Bank of Pan/ab LtdU is in .L $#adrant) t"ere is "ig" level of NPA and Low Advances
in +553 & So only Bank of Pan/ab Ltd& "as merged wit" *ent#rion Bank in +553
September and named as *ent#rion Bank of Pan/ab Ltd b#t still its in .L $#adrant so still
t"is banks "as to adopt proper strategy in providing advances and recovering debts&
D6 T"e best performing bank in t"is sector was t"e I*I*I Bank w"ic" was "ig" in its
credit si(e compared to t"e rest of t"e banks and still maintained a low NPA level
followed by .9:* Bank Ltd&&
BABASAB PATIL ,!
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
.redit ris# path of the F selected (ld PS"0s:
(ld Private
"an#s
NPA to Net
Advances
5 I6
Advances5crores6 >uadrant
analysis
=99D =99A =99D =99A =99D =99A
*ity 8nion Bank Ltd 0&0, !&A3 +5!0 +335 LL LL
9evelopment *redit
Bank Ltd
6&02 2&35 +!36 !?6, .L .L
IND 4ysya Bank Ltd +&!0 !&,6 A5?! !5+0+ L. L.
Lord Qris"na Bank Ltd 2&++ 0&!! !0?, !2+! .L .L
Bank of 1a/astan Ltd +&35 5&AA +?A6 2563 LL LL
T"e 8nited 7estern
Bank Ltd&
3&?0 3&66 0A,6 2556 .. .L
T"e Qarnatak Bank Ltd +&+A !&!? 6+?, ,,A+ L. L.
,nterpretation
BABASAB PATIL ,+
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
.redit ris# path of the F Private Sector "an#s: A >uadrant Analysis
In t"e c"art below an attempt is made to trace t"e relations"ip between NPA
proportion and t"e si(e of credit portfolio <advances= of , old Private Bank-s& :or t"is
p#rpose proportion of gross NPA-s representing credit risk in"erent is taken on t"e F
a%is and gross credit levels are taken on t"e Ga%is& Since t"ese two parameters are
assets) w"ic" are stock concept variables) t"ey "ave been plotted on t"e basis of + years
+553 and +556 for a comparative analysis&
>-AD*ANT TA"+E@ =99D
L>4>L
*1>9IT L>4>L
NPA
L'7 <B>L'7 A4D=
<L=
.ID. <AB'4> A4D=
<.=
L'7
.ID.
LL <+=
.L <+=
L. <+=
.. <!=
>-AD*ANT TA"+E@ =99A
L>4>L
*1>9IT L>4>L
NPA
L'7 <B>L'7 A4D=
<L=
.ID. <AB'4> A4D=
<.=
L'7
.ID.
LL <+=
.L <0=
L. <+=
.. <5=
BABASAB PATIL ,0
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
As depicted in t"e tables) t"e banks are divided into 2 $#adrants namely LL) L.)
.L and .. <t"e fig#res are arrived at by taking t"e averages=& T"e average of NPA-s for
t"e year +553 is 0&?!E and t"is fig#re is meas#red against eac" bank) any percentage
above t"is fig#re falls in t"e . category and percentage below 0&?!E falls in t"e L
category& T"e same applies wit" t"e advances& T"e average of advances for +553 is 0A,!
crores and 236+ crores for +556& T"e average of NPA for +556 is +&,2E& SL- represents
low or below average of t"e PSB-s and) S.- represents "ig" or above average& >&g& w"ile
LL means low in credit si(e and low in NPA-s) L. implies low in NPA and .ig" in
credit si(e& T"e following facts are visible from t"e $#adrant tableH
<6&As depicted in t"e table in +553) o#t of , Private Sector Banks) + are fall #nder LL) i&e&
Low in NPA and Low in credit si(e) + fall #nder L. i&e& Low in NPA and .ig" in credit
si(e& And remaining o#t of 0) + fall #nder .L i&e& .ig" in NPA and Low in credit si(e&
=6 As depicted in t"e table in +556) o#t of , Private Sector Banks) + are fall #nder LL) i&e&
Low in NPA and Low in credit si(e) + falls #nder L. i&e& Low in NPA and .ig" in credit
si(e& And 0 fall #nder .L i&e& .ig" in NPA and Low in credit si(e&
B6 T"ere were + banks in t"e .L $#adrant in +553 w"ic" increased to 0 in +556& It means
NPA Level is increasing year by year&
C6& T"e 8nited 7estern Bank Ltd moved from .. to .L ) t"ere is "ig" level of NPA and
.ig" Advances in +553 w"ic" moved to .ig" level of NPA and Low level of advances in
+556& Its not good sign to Bank beca#se as in +553 t"ere is .ig" NPA and *redit si(e so
Bank red#ces its advances in +556) b#t also its NPA increasing&
D6 T"e best performing bank in t"is sector was t"e IND 4ysya Bank w"ic" was "ig" in
its credit si(e compared to t"e rest of t"e banks and still maintained a low NPA level&
BABASAB PATIL ,2
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
.omparison of Ne! Private "an#0s credit path !ith (ld selected Private "an#0s
credit path y using aove >uadrant Analysis%
7"en compare to 'ld PB-s) New PB-s are performing well from past + years&
'ld PB-s Net NPA on Advances are crossing 3E or nearer to 3 E) b#t almost all
New PB-s Net NPA on Advances are below 0E& It is good sign to New PSB-s as
it "as strong credit pat"&
New PB-s are taking "ig" risk by Providing more and more advances w"en
compare to 'ld PB-)
@a/ority of 'ld PB-s provide advances to Priority sectors w"ose recovery are
very diffic#lt) beca#se advances paid for agric#lt#re are very diffic#lt to recover)
b#t New PB-s are able to provide advances to bot" priority and non priority
sectors b#t it not e%panded its services over villages& T"at-s w"y New PB-s
recovering its advances very $#ickly&
Adverse Effects of NPA on the Hor#ing of Ne! Private "an#s:
NPA "as affected t"e profitability) li$#idity and competitive f#nctioning of New
Private Banks and finally t"e psyc"ology of t"e bankers in respect of t"eir disposition
towards credit delivery and credit e%pansion& Between +552 and +556 New Private Banks
inc#rred a total amo#nt of 1s&20AA *rores towards provisioning NPA& T"is "as bro#g"t
Net NPA to 1s&3,?5 *rores or !&+5E of net advances& To t"is e%tent t"e problem is
contained) b#t at w"at costI T"is costly remedy is made at t"e sacrifice of b#ilding
"ealt"y reserves for f#t#re capital ade$#acy& T"e enormo#s provisioning of NPA toget"er
wit" t"e "olding cost of s#c" nonprod#ctive assets over t"e years "as acted as a severe
drain on t"e profitability of t"e New Private Banks& In t#rn New Private Bank-s are seen
as poor performers and #nable to approac" t"e market for raising additional capital& T"is
"as alternatively forced New Private Bank-s to borrow "eavily from t"e debt market to
b#ild Tier II *apital to meet capital ade$#acy norms p#tting severe press#re on t"eir
profit margins) else t"ey are to seek t"e bo#nty of t"e *entral Dovernment for repeated
1ecapitali(ation&
BABASAB PATIL ,3
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
&indings:
T"e brig"test spot in t"e Indian banking ind#stry in +553+556 was t"e massive
cleaning #p of banks- balance s"eets by red#cing non performing assets <NPA-s=&
T"e net NPA-s of , New Private Bank-s are red#ced by <= !?E w"ile compare to
previo#s year) i&e& from +5A, to !,5A& 7"ic" was 6E "ig"er Net NPA in +55253
w"en compare to +55052&
Net Profit of New Private Bank-s are increased by +?E from +55253 to +55356&
It may be beca#se of provisions made in +556 is comparatively low&
@ost of t"e New Private Bank-s fall #nder LL $#adrant i&e& Low in NPA and Low
in credit pat" in +55356&
All New Private Bank-s Net NPA on advances is less t"an 3E in +55356) its
good sign for companies to increase profit&
New Private Bank-s recorded a growt" in advances of 35&0E in +556 as compare
to 2+&3E of t"e previo#s year& 7"en compare to total advances of 'ld Private
Bank-s rose from 02&AE to 25&0,E& we can say New PSB-s *redit capacity is
more w"ile compare to 'ld PSB-s&
@ost banks were able to take advantage of fat profits from treas#ry operations)
bro#g"t abo#t by t"e lower interest rates) to make "ig"er provisions for bad debts&
As a res#lt) o#t of , new Private Bank-s) + New Private Bank-s i&e& .9:* Bank
Ltd and Qotak @a"indra Bank Ltd- Net NPA on advances "as become less t"an
!E& :ollowed by I*I*I Bank Ltd& And 8TI Bank Ltd Net NPA on advances are
less t"an +E&
I*I*I is Best Performer in New Private Banks as it providing "ig"er advances by
taking risk compare to ot"er banks) and is able to its NPA less t"an +E&
BABASAB PATIL ,6
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
Suggestions
!& :i%ing #p t"e b#dget for profits and recovery rat"er t"an for advances& B#dget
oriented approac" at times leads to release of credit facilities wit"o#t ens#ring
compliance of covenants of sanction& A s#itable mec"anism co#ld be drawn at
eac" bank level to provide monetary benefitsB reorgani(ation of t"e operating
staff partic#larly for recovery in NPA-s writeoff cases&
+& Pro/ects wit" old tec"nology s"o#ld not be considered for finance&
0& 8p gradation of credit skills of t"e operating staff working in advance to avoid
over and #nder finance&
2& Timely sanctionB release of loan to avoid time and cost overr#ns& and also proper
c"ecking of doc#ments w"ile sanctioning loan are recommended&
3& It is s#ggested for possible restr#ct#ring of banks t"ro#g" mergers and
ac$#isitions to keep t"emselves competitive in t"e "ig" credit risk market in
India&
6& 'ne of best sol#tion to overcome NPA is 'TS < 'ne Time Settlement=) 1BI "as
advised all banks to provide a simplified mec"anism for one time settlement of
loans w"ere t"e principle amo#nt is e$#al to or less t"an +3555B and w"ic" "ave
become do#btf#l and loss assets&
BABASAB PATIL ,,
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
.onclusion
An attempt is made in t"is st#dy to present a compre"ensive pict#re of non
performing advances of New Private banks in India) to#c"ing #pon vario#s $#antitative
and $#alitative trends in t"e post reform period) besides carrying o#t wit" some policy
and strategic implications& 8ndo#btedly India is one of t"e few co#ntries w"ere NPA
levels are very "ig" as t"ere is an increase in t"e percentage of gross advances eroding
t"eir Profit by ma/or basic points) after netting t"e provision&
New Private Banks NPA "as come down i&e& less t"an !E& 7"ile compare to old
Private Bank-s w"ose NPA is more t"an 3E& It may be beca#se of t"e proportion of
credit risk among t"e priority sector advances is do#ble t"at of nonpriority advances
implying t"e irrationality of <administered= price controls) w"ic" still e%ists in some form&
>%ternal factors o#tweig" t"e internal factors contrib#ting to t"is "ig" acc#m#lation of
NPA-s& If t"e banks "ave to s#rvive in t"e competitive and increasingly globali(e market
conditions t"ey s"o#ld be "elped bot" by t"e 1BI and t"e government in t"e form of
faster recovery climate) especially for t"e legal processes of enforcement of contracts&
T"e $#adrant analysis of credit risk clearly identifies t"at , New Private banks are
comparatively performing well w"en compare to old selected PSB-s& It also offers scope
for mergers and ac$#isitions among t"e banks to be better prepared for "ig" risk credit
marketing in India& And also $#adrant analysis "elps to identify profitability position of
New Private Banks by #sing advances provided and Non Performing Assets&
8nless New Private Banks adopt proper Strategy to prevent "#ge level of NPA-s)
it go on affecting Profitability of Banks&
BABASAB PATIL ,?
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
BABASAB PATIL ,A
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
Areviation used:
IBAH Indian Banking Association
NPAH Non Performing Assets
PB-sH Private Banks
8TI Bank LtdH 8nit Tr#st of India Bank
I*I*I Bank Ltd H Ind#strial *redit and Investment *orporation of India
.9:* Bank Ltd&H .o#sing 9evelopment :inance *orporation Bank Ltd
BABASAB PATIL ?5
Non Performing Assets and its impact on Profitability of
New Private Sector Banks
"iliography
Indian Banking Association <IBA= B#lletin +55356
7ebsites
@ www&Indianbankingassociation&com
@ www&#tibank&com
@ www&Doogle&com
BABASAB PATIL ?!