You are on page 1of 8

OPTIONS OF IDENTITY IN

ACADEMIC WRITING
(KEN HYLAND)
Presented by:
Razki Raditya
INTRODUCTION
General overview of his paper, which includes:
Problem arouse
Argumentation toward the problem
Problem solving
WRITER IDENTITY AND IMPERSONALITY
Academic writing is impersonal, objective,
anonymous
Hylands refutation:
Different disciplines = different point of views (Hyland
2000; Johns 1997)
University writing = creating new identity (Fan Shen
1988)
Difficulties faced by L2 learners
Unfamiliar (Cadman 1997)
Less knowledge of different conventions (Lea and Street
1999)

STUDY ON EXPERTS WRITINGS
Interviewed expert writers
Examined 240 published journals
Wordpilot 2000 program
Results:
Academic writing does not have any uniform
Differs between disciplines
Writer pronouns: make personal standing, underline
authors saying, present claims and results, and intrude
into text
Fewer writer pronouns: strengthen impression of
objectivity
STUDY ON L2 STUDENTS WRITINGS
Interviewed Hong Kong students and subject
supervisors
Observed 48 project reports written by the students
Results:
Tend to avoid author pronouns
Inappropriate
Cultural basis to use passive voice
Lack of authorial identity
Unsuccessful academic argument



CREATING LEARNER AWARENESS
Reduce the overuse of I pronouns
Using I pronouns properly and effectively
How to develop students rhetorical awareness?
Analyzing self-practices
Analyzing expert-practices
Teacher encouragement
Teacher as intermediary
Students independency
CONCLUSION
Proper language choices
Interpersonal aspects are central
Teachers role in promoting students awareness on
rhetorical choices and effects
THANK YOU

You might also like