Method Soil Investigation

Method Statement
FOR
Soil Investigation
PREPARED BY
JUNE 2010
Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter
Title
Page
Table of Contents..1
List of Appendix....................................................................................................................................... 2
List of Table............................................................................................................................................. 2
List of Figures.......................................................................................................................................... 2
1.0
INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND OF THE PROJECT ....................................................... 3
2.0
SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND BOUNDARY SURVEY ..3

3.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 3
3.2 Boring and Sampling .4
3.4 Groundwater Measurement................................................................................................ ...4
3.5
Field permeability Test ..4
3.6
Soil Resistivity Test ...5
3.7 Test Pit.5
3.8
Down Hole Seismic Test .5
3.9
Dutch Cone Penetration Test .....5
3.10 Site Boundary Survey
4.0
LABORATORY TEST ..6
4.1 Unconfined Compression test .6
4.2 Atterberg Limits .6
4.3 Particle Size Analysis ...6
4.4 Unit Weight and Water Content Determination.7
4.5 Oedometer test ..7
4.6 Compaction Test and CBR Test 7
4.7
Water Analysis .7
5.0
REPORT ....8
Figures
Appendix
Tables
List of Appendix
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Sample of Soil Boring Log data sheet

Sample of Summary of general laboratory test data sheet
Sample of Pile calculation data sheet
Sample of Shallow Foundation Bearing Capacity Analysis
Sample of Prediction of long term settlement calculation
List of Table
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 10
Table 11
Table 12
Sample of Unconfined Compression Test data sheet

Sample of Atterberg Limit Test data sheet
Sample of Sieve Analysis Test data sheet
Sample of Unit Weight data sheet
Sample of Water content Test data sheet
Sample of Consolidation Test data sheet
Sample of Field Permeability test data sheet
Sample of soil resistivity test data sheet
Sample of down hole seismic test data sheet
Sample of Dutch cone penetration test data sheet
Sample of compaction and CBR test data sheet
Sample water analysis test data sheet
1.0
INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND OF THE PROJECT
This method statement will summarizes the procedure on the subsoil investigation works and
boundary survey to be conducted by Infratech ASTM Company Limited for the
construction
..
2.0
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for the geotechnical consultancy services of the project are summarized as
follows:
Soil boring, field testing and carrying out sufficient in-situ testing and sampling.
Laboratory testing of obtained samples to determine the properties of the subsoil.
Determination of geotechnical parameters required for foundation analyses.
Carrying out engineering analyses for foundation design.
3.0
FIELD INVESTIGATION
3.1
General
The investigation program included drilling boreholes and collecting soil samples at desired
intervals for subsequent observation and laboratory testing.
The investigation program will consist of soil boring and sampling at desired intervals for
subsequent observation and laboratory testing to determine the capacity of pile foundation economically
and safely.
3.2
Boring and Sampling

The boreholes will be made by the rotary drilling machine.
Undisturbed sample will be taken in the soft and medium clay at 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 m depths
and at 1.5 m intervals thereafter using a thin-walled sampler with dimensions conforming to standard
sampling tubes specification (ASTM D 1587).
Disturbed samples for very stiff clay to hard clay layer will be collected during Standard
Penetration Testing at 1.5 m intervals. (ASTM D 1586)
The borings shall be drilled vertically through soil approximately 30 meters deep or stop in firm
layer when SPT N-value is greater than 50 blows/ft.
Accuracy of bore hole position will be not more than 2.0 m. in horizontal direction and 0.20 in
vertical direction.
3.3
Standard Penetration Testing
Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) will be carried out to provide an indication of the density
and/or consistency of the ground and to obtain disturbed samples for visual inspection and laboratory
testing and classification. The results of the tests will be given on the boring logs in Appendix A and will
3

be expressed as an N value. The N value is defined as the blow-count for 12 (300mm) penetration
recorded after the seating drive of 15 cm. In the case of premature refusal conditions, the number of
blows for a recorded penetration (including the seating drive) is noted.
In SPT testing, the rope-and-pulley (R-P) method will be used. This consisted of a hollow
cylindrical mass sliding over a steel rod. It is operated by lifting the mass with a rope over a cat head. At
the instant the mass reached the required height (760 mm), the mass will be released manually driving
the split spoon into the soil. Disturbed samples collected from the split-spoon sampler during Standard
Penetration Test will be visually inspected before storing in a polyethylene bag for laboratory testing. A
graphical representation of the changes in the soil strata, water levels and SPT N values will be given in
the boring logs.
3.4
Groundwater Measurement
Groundwater is one element that affects in the stability and foundation analyses. The
groundwater level was measured 24 hours after completion of the borehole.
However, the low permeability of the soil will mean that the water level in the borehole is
controlled more by drilling fluid rather than by the ground water itself. Significant fluctuations in the
location of ground water table should be anticipated throughout the year, depending upon the amount of
precipitation, evaporation and surface runoff.
3.5
Field Permeability Test
Permeability test of soil in the field will be performed at the depth of 2,4,6,8 and 10 m. by
constant head method.
3.6
Soil Resistity Test (Provisional)
The purpose of this test is to investigate for the need of cathode protection and to have data
necessary for the design of an adequate grounding system.
The soil Resistivity measurement shall be carried out in accordance with IEEE 81 standard
Guide for Measuring Earth Resistivity, Ground Impedance and Earth Surface Potentials of a Ground
System . The measurement shall be done using Wenner Four Points Method with equal test rods
spacing.
The area to be measured shall be the power block area of power plant, terminal substation and
switchyard. Before carrying out the measurement, the rectangular grid shall be drawn for the testing
areas with mesh spacing at approximately 5-10 m. The measurement shall be made at every intersection
point of grid lines. The measurement at any point shall be done for two directions, one from the
measured point along the direction from east to west and another shall be from the measured point
along the direction from north to south. The measurement at any point shall consist of the measured data
at the varying space between test rods for the following distance; 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 m. For each
area of measurement, the results of measurement shall be shown in the table for each point of
measurement for each direction and every designated space of measurement. The measured resistivity
data shall be averaged for each of the same spacing of measured data. The overall averaged resistivity
of each area shall also be reported.
3.7
Test Pit (Provisional)
Test pit shall be preformed 3 points of 1x1m size 3 m deep, by mean of hand excavation. Bulk
sample taken from the test pits of not less than 50 kg each shall be sent to test at laboratory for
compaction and CBR test.
3.8
Seismic down hole test (Provisional)
The down hole Test is a method which determines soil stiffness properties by analyzing direct
compression and shear waves along a borehole.
Seismic down hole test shall be performed at 1.0 meter intervals to the depth of 30.0 m. or to the
same depth of soil bore hole (where SPT N-value is greater than 50 blows/ft)
The test shall be intended to collect shear wave velocity information that will be used in dynamic
analysis. The testing location shall be located in the power block area and close to expected location of
Steam Turbine foundation.
3.9
Dutch Cone Penetration Test (Provisional)
Dutch cone penetration test shall be preformed depth 30m. or to the depth when the total
resistant of the cone penetrometer reach 4.0 tons.
The test shall be carried out in accordance with the ASTM D 3441.
The cone penetration test shall be consists of pushing into the soil, at a sufficiently slow rate, a
series of cylindrical rods with a conical tip at the base for measuring the cone resistance and friction
resistance every 20 cm intervals.
4.0
LABORATORY TESTING
Geotechnical laboratory tests will be performed on the soil samples to classify soil and to
determine their engineering characteristics. All laboratory tests will be conducted in accordance with
ASTM Standards. The soils will be also classified based on the Unified Soil Classification System
(USCS).
4.1
Unconfined Compression Tests
Unconfined compression test will be conducted in accordance with ASTM D2166. The tests will
be performed by compressing cylindrical samples to failure. Failure generally occurs when the greatest
ratio of shear stress to shear strength occurs. The cohesion (c) of the sample is taken as half the
unconfined compressive strength.
Sample of test results and data sheet has been shown in Table 1
4.2
Atterberg Limits
Atterberg limits will be determined (ASTM D 4318) on representative soil samples of cohesive
soils. The Atterberg limits refer to arbitrarily defined boundaries between the liquid and plastic states,
and between the plastic and brittle states of grained soils, expressed as water content, in percentage.
The liquid limit is the water content at which a part of soil placed in a standard cup, cut by a standard
grooving tool, will flow together at the base of the groove when the cup is subjected to 25 standard
shocks. The one-point liquid limit test is usually carried out and distilled water may be added during soil
mixing to achieve a desired consistency.
4.3
Particle Size Analysis
Particle size analysis will be performed by means of sieving (ASTM D 422). For oven-dry
materials, sieving is carried out for particles that are being retained on a 0.063 mm sieve. In sieve
analysis, the mass of soil retained on each sieve is determined and expressed as a percentage of the
total mass of the sample. The particle size is plotted on a logarithmic scale so that two soils having the
same degree of uniformity are represented by curves of the distribution plot. In Hydrometer analysis is
based on the principle of sedimentation of soil grains in water. When a soil specimen is dispersed in
water, the particles settle at different velocities, depending on their shape, size, and weight. For
simplicity, it is assumed that soil particles are spheres and the velocity of soil particles can be express by
Stokes law.
4.4
Unit Weight and Water Content Determination
As a routine laboratory test, unit weights of soils will be determined based on the mass of soil in
a standard volume steel cylinder with cutting edge. The unit weight refers to the unit weight of the soil at
the sampled water content. The dry unit weight is determined from the mass and the water content of the
specimen.
Water content (ASTM D 2216)is determined by oven-drying a moist/wet soil at a constant
temperature of 105 C for 18 - 24 hours. The difference in mass before and after drying is used as the
mass of water in the specimen, while the mass of remaining material is used as the mass of solid
particles. The ratio between the mass of water and the mass of solid particles is the water content of the
soil material
Sample of test results and data sheet has been shown in Table 4 and Table 5
4.5
Oedometer Test /Consolidation test (Provisional)
In case of soft clay layer has been encountered, 1 undisturbed sample will be collected from mid
layer of soft clay for Oedometer test.
Oedometer tests will be conducted (ASTM D 2435) to determine the rate and magnitude of
consolidation of a laterally restrained soil specimen which is axially loaded in increments of constant
stress until the excess pore water pressures have dissipated for each increment. Each load increment is
maintained for at least 24 hours. The test is generally carried out on undisturbed cohesive specimens.
4.6
Compaction Test and CBR Test (Provisional)
Bulk sample taken from the test pits of not less than 20 kg each shall be sent to test at laboratory
for compaction and CBR test conformed to ASTM D1883.
4.7
Ground Water Analysis
The bored hole shall be drilled at depth approximate 3 m. without bentonite and leave it 7 days
for collecting underground water to do water analysis test.
The test parameters are listed below:
5.0
REPORT
Confirmed Preliminary Report findings along with the remainder of test results to be
Submitted in a Final Report.
The Final Report shall include but not limited to:
Results of all of the above mentioned tests.
Result of graph to show Cumulative Ultimate Skin Friction & Ultimate End
Bearing Capacity & Depth for driven pile for each borehole.
Recommendations for :
1. Bearing capacity for shallow foundation.
2. Pile capacity resistance to compression and tension.
3. Settlement for shallow foundation.
Underground water level and borehole elevation.
Licensed engineer sign up responsible for the report
APPENDIX A
SOIL BORING LOG

Sample Sheet
ASTM TESTING CO., LTD.
ASTM
BORING LOG
BH-0
Borehole No. BH-08
SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT

BANGKLA CHACHOENGSAO
24
Page 1 of 1
Atterberg Limits
40
80
Recovery
Method
Sample No.
Graphic Log
Depth (m)
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SOIL DESCRIPTION
t
1.0
SPT-N (Blow/30cm.)
20 40 60 80 100
Su (t/m2)
4 6 8
(t/m3)
2.0
1.49
1.01
1.6
1.3
10
Borehole Elevation = 1.99 m.

0.80 m. Top soil
2.00 m.
ST 1
ST 2
5
ST 3
Brown,
moist to saturated, medium plasticity,
very soft to soft, Sandy Clay.
(CL)
1.69
SS 1
1.7
6.50 m.
ST 4
1.81
Brown, moist, high plasticity,

stiff, Sandy Clay.
(CH)
9.45 m.
SS 2
2.14
0.54
10
10
SS 3
1.96
Brown, moist, medium plasticity,

very stiff to hard, Sandy Clay.
(CL)
1.85
12.45 m.
SS 4
1.89
SS 5
15
SS 6
SS 7
1.96
Brown, moist, high plasticity,

stiff to very stiff,
Sandy Clay.
(CH)
trace gravel.
31
14
16
15
SS 8
20
22
17
19.95 m.
SS 9
22
SS 10
SS 11
58
Brown, moist, medium plasticity,
hard, Sandy Clay.
(CL)
76
1.93
24.45 m.
SS 12
End of Boring = 24.45 m.
Start date:
Finished date:
Borehole Depth:
Observed GWL.
Drilling Foreman:
8-..-09
8-..-09
24.45 m.
-1.50 m.
Thawatchai
ABBREVIATIONS:
ST = Undisturbed Sample
SS = Split Spoon Sample
PL
W n LL
Su (UC)
Su (FV)
Total Unit Weight
Su (PP)
SPT, N
(Blow/30 cm.)
LL = Liquid Limit
PL = Plastic Limit
gt = Total Unit Weight

SPT = Standard Penetration Test
APPENDIX B
SUMMARY OF GENERAL LABORATORY TEST

Sample sheet
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD.
SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
PROJECT:
BORE HOLE NO.
BH - 8
LOCATION:
Water Level :
-1.50 M.
Depth. (m.)
Sample No
From
To
USCS
Wn,at
UC Test
wet,
Soil
Received
SU
gm./cc.
Atterberg Limits
Nspt
Gradation % Passing
LL
PL
PI
(%)
(%)
(%)
#4
# 10
# 40
# 200
(Blow /
Soil Description
group
(%)
(T / m )
Foot)
0.00
1.50
Top Soil
ST - 1
1.50
2.00
88.34
1.01
1.49
ST - 2
3.00
3.50
61.41
1.30
1.60
ST - 3
4.50
5.00
55.20
2.14
1.69
ST - 4
6.00
6.50
54.24
0.54
1.70
SS - 1
7.50
7.95
SS - 2
9.00
9.45
SS - 3
10.50
10.95
SS - 4
12.00
12.45
1.85
31
SS - 5
13.50
13.95
1.89
14
SS - 6
15.00
15.45
1.96
16
SS - 7
16.50
16.95
SS - 8
18.00
18.45
17
SS - 9
19.50
19.95
22
SS - 10
21.00
21.45
58
SS - 11
22.50
22.95
SS - 12
24.00
24.45
CL
CH
31.07
1.81
40.05
24.33
15.72
97.74
93.07
86.41
75.43
100.00
99.77
98.51
94.33
Sandy Clay (CL,CH).
56.08
23.51
32.56
99.04
98.92
98.11
91.63
9
10
CL
CH
CL
22.04
1.96
32.88
48.11
60.30
17.82
41.11
21.29
28.53
18.58
26.82
31.77
22.54
100.00
93.45
99.70
1.93
99.85
91.79
99.30
99.29
89.23
96.57
95.86
85.09
82.52
22
15
76
89
END OF BORING AT 24.45 M.
Sandy Clay (CH)

trace gravel.
Sandy Clay (CL).
Appendix C
Pile Calculation
Sample sheet
Appendix B 1 - BH-1
(Estimation of Soil Bearing Capacity)

Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.
Saraburi
BH-1
LOCATION :

Saraburi
BOREHOLE NO.:
BH-1
PROJECT :
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90 100
Depth (m)
Ultimate End Bearing(t/sq.m.)
SOIL BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATION
SHALLOW FOUNDATION SOIL BEARING CAPACITY

Project:
Location:
Saraburi
Borehole No.:
Depth
Soil Description
Df
0.0
Factor of safety :
3.00
Allowable settlement, Se
25.0
mm.
Depth of water =
1.53
Unit weight
USCS S=Sand
BH-1
vo,base
SPT (N-value)
Field
'vo,base
below ground level

Cohesion, Su
Correct Design
FDN Dimension
NET SOIL BEARING CAPACITY
CLAY
qu (kPa) qall (kPa) qall (t/m2)
C=Clay
t/m2
kN/m2
NF
Ncor.
Ndesign
t/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
m.
m.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SUMMARY
SAND
Fd
-
qall (kPa) qall (t/m2)

-
Depth
qall
(m)
(t/m2)
1.0
CL
2.0
19.6
20
13
2.00
2.00
19.62
7.89
77.39
1.0
1.0
572.8
190.9
19.5
1.0
19.5
2.0
CL
2.0
19.6
12
20
15
4.00
3.53
34.63
9.15
89.80
1.0
1.0
775.4
258.5
26.3
2.0
26.3
3.0
CL
2.0
19.6
15
22
17
6.00
4.53
44.44
10.83
106.28
1.0
1.0
1048.8
349.6
35.6
3.0
35.6
4.0
CL
2.1
20.2
20
26
22
8.06
5.59
54.84
13.83
135.72
1.0
1.0
1506.8
502.3
51.2
4.0
51.2
Remark:
1) qall = Net allowable soil bearing capacity

2) Corected Standard Penetration, N correct = NF*sqrt(95.6/'v), After Liao and Whitman (1986)
3) The net ultimate bearing capacity for clayey soil ( = 0 condition), qnet(u) = 5.14cu(1+0.2Df/B)(1+0.2B/L) , After Skempton (1951)
4) The net ultimate bearing capacity for sand, After Bowles (1977)
qnet(u) = 19.16Ncor Fd (Se /25.4)
(for B < 1.22 m.)
qnet(u) = 11.98Ncor [(3.28B+1)/3.28B]2 Fd (Se /25.4)
(for B > 1.22 m.)
Appendix B 2 - BH-1
(Recommendation for Pile Capacity and length)

Saraburi
BH-1
RECOMMENDED PILE LENGTH AND CAPACITY FOR FOR SINGLE PILE

Project: Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.
Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Soil Capacity F.S. =2.5(Tons)
Pile Structural
Pile Type
Pile Size
Length(m.)
Compression
Tension
Lateral
Capacity(Tons)
Driven Pile
0.25x0.25
12.0
39
32
0.2
40
Can not be installed when SPT>=Limit
Driven Pile
0.30x0.30
12.0
48
38
0.3
55
Driven Pile
0.35x0.35
12.0
58
45
0.5
70
Driven Pile
0.40x0.40
12.0
68
51
0.6
80
Bored Pile
Dia.0.35
10.0
44
35
0.3
48
Bored Pile
Dia.0.40
11.5
61
49
0.4
63
Bored Pile
Dia.0.50
13.0
94
74
0.5
98
Bored Pile
Dia.0.60
14.5
140
105
0.7
141
Driven Pile may not be installed pass through depth where SPT limit >=
50
REMARK
RECOMMENDED ALLOWABLE LOAD FOR SINGLE SQUARE DRIVEN PILE
Location:

Saraburi
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water :
1.53
Project:
Depth
25 x 25 cm. Square Driven Pile
m. below ground level
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
4.0
19.4
8.3
0.5
10.9
23.3
11.9
0.6
13.8
27.2
16.2
0.9
17.0
31.1
21.2
1.2
20.4
5.0
25.5
10.0
0.6
14.0
30.6
14.5
0.9
17.7
35.8
19.7
1.2
21.7
40.9
25.7
1.5
26.0
7.5
42.0
11.6
1.0
21.1
50.4
16.7
1.4
26.3
58.9
22.7
1.9
31.9
67.3
29.6
2.5
37.8
9.0
54.5
16.3
1.2
27.9
65.5
23.5
1.7
34.9
76.4
32.0
2.4
42.4
87.3
41.8
3.1
50.4
10.5
66.7
15.9
1.4
32.4
80.0
22.9
2.1
40.3
93.4
31.1
2.8
48.7
106.7
40.6
3.6
57.5
12.0
79.9
18.1
1.7
38.6
95.9
26.1
2.4
47.9
111.9
35.6
3.2
57.7
127.9
46.4
4.2
68.0
13.5
94.9
21.4
1.9
45.8
113.9
30.8
2.7
56.8
132.9
41.9
3.7
68.4
151.9
54.7
4.8
80.7
15.0
112.2
24.5
2.1
53.8
134.6
35.3
3.0
66.7
157.0
48.1
4.1
80.4
179.4
62.8
5.4
94.7
(meters)
REMARK : 1. Negative skin friction is not consider in the calculation
2. Pile cut-off elevation -1.00 m. below ground level
RECOMMENDED ALLOWABLE LOAD FOR SINGLE BORED PILE
Location:

Saraburi
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water :
1.53
Project:
35 cm. Dia. Bored Pile
Depth
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
4.0
31.2
12.8
0.7
17.3
35.7
16.7
0.9
20.6
44.6
26.0
1.4
27.7
53.6
37.5
2.0
35.6
5.0
41.1
15.5
0.9
22.3
47.0
20.2
1.2
26.4
58.7
31.5
1.9
35.4
70.5
45.4
2.7
45.3
7.5
67.7
17.8
1.5
33.6
77.3
23.3
2.0
39.5
96.7
36.4
3.1
52.0
116.0
52.4
4.4
65.6
9.0
87.8
25.1
1.8
44.4
100.4
32.8
2.4
52.3
125.5
51.3
3.8
69.2
150.5
73.9
5.4
87.6
10.5
107.4
24.4
2.2
51.8
122.7
31.9
2.9
60.7
153.4
49.9
4.5
79.5
184.0
71.8
6.4
99.8
12.0
128.7
27.9
2.5
61.6
147.1
36.5
3.3
72.1
183.8
57.0
5.2
94.3
220.6
82.1
7.5
118.1
13.5
152.8
32.9
2.9
73.1
174.6
43.0
3.8
85.5
218.3
67.1
5.9
111.8
261.9
96.7
8.5
140.1
15.0
180.6
37.8
3.2
86.0
206.4
49.3
4.2
100.6
257.9
77.1
6.6
131.4
309.5
111.0
9.5
164.4
(meters)
Appendix B 3 - BH-1
Graph
(Cumulative Ultimate Skin Friction & Ultimate End
Bearing Capacity & Depth)

BH-1
LOCATION :

Saraburi
BOREHOLE NO.:
BH-1
PROJECT :
50
100
150
200
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
200
400
600
800
1,000
10
10
12
12
14
14
16
16
Ultinate Skin Friction(t/m.Perimeter)
CUMMULATIVE ULTIMATE SKIN FRICTION AND ULTIMATE END BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH OF DRIVEN PILE
LOCATION :

Saraburi
BOREHOLE NO.:
BH-1
PROJECT :
50
100
150
200
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
200
400
600
800
1,000
10
10
12
12
14
14
16
16
Ultinate Skin Friction(t/m.Perimeter)
CUMMULATIVE ULTIMATE SKIN FRICTION AND ULTIMATE END BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH OF BORED PILE
Appendix B
( Driven Pile Calculation)

Saraburi
BH-1
SINGLE SQUARE DRIVEN PILE CAPACITY CALCULATION-STATIC FORMULA

Saraburi
Project:
Location:
Depth
To
Soil Description
Unit
Unit
USCS S=Sand Weight Weight

C=Clay
t/m2
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Pile size :
0.25
Area:
0.063
m2
Perimeter :
1.000
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
1.53
vo
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
'tip
'tip
0.25
m.
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
Corr.
kN/m2
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
t/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
tons
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
CL
2.0
19.62
20
13
2.00
2.00
19.62
1.00
9.81
7.89
0.55
73.0
4.4
4.6
4.4
4.4
4.4
0.0
8.9
3.6
2.0
CL
2.0
19.62
12
20
15
4.00
3.53
34.63
2.77
27.12
9.15
0.50
86.4
4.5
5.4
4.5
8.9
8.9
0.2
9.8
5.7
3.0
CL
2.0
19.62
15
22
17
6.00
4.53
44.44
4.03
39.53
10.83
0.46
103.5
4.9
6.5
4.9
13.9
13.9
0.3
11.1
8.0
4.0
CL
2.1
20.21
20
26
22
8.06
5.59
54.84
5.06
49.64
13.83
0.40
132.6
5.6
8.3
5.6
19.4
19.4
0.5
13.4
10.9
5.0
CL
2.1
20.21
25
30
27
10.12
6.65
65.24
6.12
60.04
16.72
0.37
160.6
6.1
10.0
6.1
25.5
25.5
0.6
15.6
14.0
7.5
CL
2.1
20.40
30
31
30
15.32
9.35
91.72
8.00
78.48
18.88
0.35
185.2
6.6
11.6
16.5
42.0
42.0
1.0
27.1
21.1
9.0
SC
2.1
20.60
44
41
43
18.47
11.00
107.91
10.18
99.82
26.96
0.31
261.1
8.3
16.3
12.5
54.5
54.5
1.2
27.6
27.9
10.5
SC
2.0
19.62
43
38
41
21.47
12.50
122.63
11.75
115.27
25.83
0.31
253.9
8.1
15.9
12.1
66.7
66.7
1.4
26.6
32.4
12.0
SC
2.0
19.42
50
42
47
24.44
13.97
137.05
13.24
129.84
29.53
0.30
290.2
8.8
18.1
13.2
79.9
79.9
1.7
29.7
38.6
13.5
CL
2.0
19.42
60
48
56
27.41
15.44
151.47
14.71
144.26
34.93
0.29
341.8
10.0
21.4
15.0
94.9
94.9
1.9
34.5
45.8
15.0
SG
2.1
20.11
70
53
64
30.49
17.02
166.92
16.23
159.19
40.20
0.29
392.3
11.5
24.5
17.2
112.2
112.2
2.1
39.7
53.8
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
15.0
15.0
Remark:
1) Negative skin friction is not consider in the calculation

2) Pile cut-off level is at - 1.00 m. below ground level
3) Limited maximum end bearing, qb = 1000 t/sq.m. for sand (Reese and O' Neill, 1989)
4) Corected Standard Penetration, Ncorrect = NF*sqrt(95.6/'v), (Liao and Whitman, 1986)

Saraburi
Project:
Location:
Depth
To
Soil Description
Unit
Unit

C=Clay
t/m2
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Pile size :
0.30
Area:
0.090
m2
Perimeter :
1.200
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
1.53
vo
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
'tip
'tip
0.30
m.
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
Corr.
kN/m2
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
t/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
tons
0.0
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
CL
2.0
19.62
20
13
2.00
2.00
19.62
1.00
9.81
7.89
0.55
73.0
4.4
6.6
5.2
5.2
4.4
0.0
11.8
4.7
2.0
CL
2.0
19.62
12
20
15
4.00
3.53
34.63
2.77
27.12
9.15
0.50
86.4
4.5
7.8
5.5
10.7
8.9
0.2
13.0
7.3
3.0
CL
2.0
19.62
15
22
17
6.00
4.53
44.44
4.03
39.53
10.83
0.46
103.5
4.9
9.3
5.9
16.6
13.9
0.4
14.8
10.2
4.0
CL
2.1
20.21
20
26
22
8.06
5.59
54.84
5.06
49.64
13.83
0.40
132.6
5.6
11.9
6.7
23.3
19.4
0.6
17.9
13.8
5.0
CL
2.1
20.21
25
30
27
10.12
6.65
65.24
6.12
60.04
16.72
0.37
160.6
6.1
14.5
7.4
30.6
25.5
0.9
20.9
17.7
7.5
CL
2.1
20.40
30
31
30
15.32
9.35
91.72
8.00
78.48
18.88
0.35
185.2
6.6
16.7
19.8
50.4
42.0
1.4
35.1
26.3
9.0
SC
2.1
20.60
44
41
43
18.47
11.00
107.91
10.18
99.82
26.96
0.31
261.1
8.3
23.5
15.0
65.5
54.5
1.7
36.8
34.9
10.5
SC
2.0
19.62
43
38
41
21.47
12.50
122.63
11.75
115.27
25.83
0.31
253.9
8.1
22.9
14.6
80.0
66.7
2.1
35.4
40.3
12.0
SC
2.0
19.42
50
42
47
24.44
13.97
137.05
13.24
129.84
29.53
0.30
290.2
8.8
26.1
15.9
95.9
79.9
2.4
39.6
47.9
13.5
CL
2.0
19.42
60
48
56
27.41
15.44
151.47
14.71
144.26
34.93
0.29
341.8
10.0
30.8
18.0
113.9
94.9
2.7
46.0
56.8
15.0
SG
2.1
20.11
70
53
64
30.49
17.02
166.92
16.23
159.19
40.20
0.29
392.3
11.5
35.3
20.7
134.6
112.2
3.0
53.0
66.7
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
15.0
15.0
Remark:


Saraburi
Project:
Location:
Depth
To
Soil Description
Unit
Unit

C=Clay
t/m2
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Pile size :
0.35
Area:
0.123
m2
Perimeter :
1.400
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
1.53
vo
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
'tip
'tip
0.35
m.
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
Corr.
kN/m2
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
t/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
tons
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
CL
2.0
19.62
20
13
2.00
2.00
19.62
1.00
9.81
7.89
0.55
73.0
4.4
8.9
6.1
6.1
4.4
0.0
15.1
6.0
2.0
CL
2.0
19.62
12
20
15
4.00
3.53
34.63
2.77
27.12
9.15
0.50
86.4
4.5
10.6
6.4
12.5
8.9
0.3
16.7
9.1
3.0
CL
2.0
19.62
15
22
17
6.00
4.53
44.44
4.03
39.53
10.83
0.46
103.5
4.9
12.7
6.9
19.4
13.9
0.6
19.0
12.6
4.0
CL
2.1
20.21
20
26
22
8.06
5.59
54.84
5.06
49.64
13.83
0.40
132.6
5.6
16.2
7.8
27.2
19.4
0.9
23.1
17.0
5.0
CL
2.1
20.21
25
30
27
10.12
6.65
65.24
6.12
60.04
16.72
0.37
160.6
6.1
19.7
8.6
35.8
25.5
1.2
27.1
21.7
7.5
CL
2.1
20.40
30
31
30
15.32
9.35
91.72
8.00
78.48
18.88
0.35
185.2
6.6
22.7
23.1
58.9
42.0
1.9
43.9
31.9
9.0
SC
2.1
20.60
44
41
43
18.47
11.00
107.91
10.18
99.82
26.96
0.31
261.1
8.3
32.0
17.5
76.4
54.5
2.4
47.1
42.4
10.5
SC
2.0
19.62
43
38
41
21.47
12.50
122.63
11.75
115.27
25.83
0.31
253.9
8.1
31.1
17.0
93.4
66.7
2.8
45.3
48.7
12.0
SC
2.0
19.42
50
42
47
24.44
13.97
137.05
13.24
129.84
29.53
0.30
290.2
8.8
35.6
18.5
111.9
79.9
3.2
50.9
57.7
13.5
CL
2.0
19.42
60
48
56
27.41
15.44
151.47
14.71
144.26
34.93
0.29
341.8
10.0
41.9
21.0
132.9
94.9
3.7
59.2
68.4
15.0
SG
2.1
20.11
70
53
64
30.49
17.02
166.92
16.23
159.19
40.20
0.29
392.3
11.5
48.1
24.1
157.0
112.2
4.1
68.1
80.4
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
15.0
15.0
Remark:


Saraburi
Project:
Location:
Depth
To
Soil Description
Unit
Unit

C=Clay
t/m2
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Pile size :
0.40
Area:
0.160
m2
Perimeter :
1.600
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
1.53
vo
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
'tip
'tip
0.40
m.
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
Corr.
kN/m2
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
t/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
tons
0.0
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
CL
2.0
19.62
20
13
2.00
2.00
19.62
1.00
9.81
7.89
0.55
73.0
4.4
11.7
7.0
7.0
4.4
0.0
18.7
7.5
2.0
CL
2.0
19.62
12
20
15
4.00
3.53
34.63
2.77
27.12
9.15
0.50
86.4
4.5
13.8
7.3
14.3
8.9
0.4
20.7
11.1
3.0
CL
2.0
19.62
15
22
17
6.00
4.53
44.44
4.03
39.53
10.83
0.46
103.5
4.9
16.6
7.9
22.2
13.9
0.8
23.7
15.2
4.0
CL
2.1
20.21
20
26
22
8.06
5.59
54.84
5.06
49.64
13.83
0.40
132.6
5.6
21.2
8.9
31.1
19.4
1.2
28.9
20.4
5.0
CL
2.1
20.21
25
30
27
10.12
6.65
65.24
6.12
60.04
16.72
0.37
160.6
6.1
25.7
9.8
40.9
25.5
1.5
34.0
26.0
7.5
CL
2.1
20.40
30
31
30
15.32
9.35
91.72
8.00
78.48
18.88
0.35
185.2
6.6
29.6
26.4
67.3
42.0
2.5
53.5
37.8
9.0
SC
2.1
20.60
44
41
43
18.47
11.00
107.91
10.18
99.82
26.96
0.31
261.1
8.3
41.8
20.0
87.3
54.5
3.1
58.7
50.4
10.5
SC
2.0
19.62
43
38
41
21.47
12.50
122.63
11.75
115.27
25.83
0.31
253.9
8.1
40.6
19.4
106.7
66.7
3.6
56.4
57.5
12.0
SC
2.0
19.42
50
42
47
24.44
13.97
137.05
13.24
129.84
29.53
0.30
290.2
8.8
46.4
21.2
127.9
79.9
4.2
63.4
68.0
13.5
CL
2.0
19.42
60
48
56
27.41
15.44
151.47
14.71
144.26
34.93
0.29
341.8
10.0
54.7
24.0
151.9
94.9
4.8
73.9
80.7
15.0
SG
2.1
20.11
70
53
64
30.49
17.02
166.92
16.23
159.19
40.20
0.29
392.3
11.5
62.8
27.6
179.4
112.2
5.4
85.0
94.7
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
392.3
112.2
15.0
15.0
15.0
Remark:

Appendix B
( Bored Pile Calculation)

Saraburi
BH-1
SINGLE BORED PILE CAPACITY CALCULATION-STATIC FORMULA

Saraburi
Project:
Location:
Depth
To
Soil Description
Unit
Unit

C=Clay
t/m2
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Pile Dia.(m.) :
0.35
Area:
0.096
m2
Perimeter :
1.400
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
1.53
vo
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
'tip
'tip
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
Corr.
kN/m2
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
t/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
tons
0.0
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
CL
2.0
19.62
20
13
2.00
2.00
19.62
1.00
9.81
7.89
0.55
73.0
5.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
5.0
0.0
14.1
5.6
2.0
CL
2.0
19.62
12
20
15
4.00
3.53
34.63
2.77
27.12
9.15
0.50
86.4
5.2
8.3
7.3
14.4
10.3
0.2
15.4
9.0
3.0
CL
2.0
19.62
15
22
17
6.00
4.53
44.44
4.03
39.53
10.83
0.46
103.5
5.7
10.0
8.0
22.3
15.9
0.5
17.5
12.7
4.0
CL
2.1
20.21
20
26
22
8.06
5.59
54.84
5.06
49.64
13.83
0.40
132.6
6.4
12.8
8.9
31.2
22.3
0.7
21.0
17.3
5.0
CL
2.1
20.21
25
30
27
10.12
6.65
65.24
6.12
60.04
16.72
0.37
160.6
7.0
15.5
9.9
41.1
29.4
0.9
24.4
22.3
7.5
CL
2.1
20.40
30
31
30
15.32
9.35
91.72
8.00
78.48
18.88
0.35
185.2
7.6
17.8
26.6
67.7
48.3
1.5
42.9
33.6
9.0
SC
2.1
20.60
44
41
43
18.47
11.00
107.91
10.18
99.82
26.96
0.31
261.1
9.6
25.1
20.1
87.8
62.7
1.8
43.4
44.4
10.5
SC
2.0
19.62
43
38
41
21.47
12.50
122.63
11.75
115.27
25.83
0.31
253.9
9.3
24.4
19.5
107.4
76.7
2.2
41.8
51.8
12.0
SC
2.0
19.42
50
42
47
24.44
13.97
137.05
13.24
129.84
29.53
0.30
290.2
10.2
27.9
21.3
128.7
91.9
2.5
46.7
61.6
13.5
CL
2.0
19.42
60
48
56
27.41
15.44
151.47
14.71
144.26
34.93
0.29
341.8
11.5
32.9
24.1
152.8
109.1
2.9
54.1
73.1
15.0
SG
2.1
20.11
70
53
64
30.49
17.02
166.92
16.23
159.19
40.20
0.29
392.3
13.2
37.8
27.8
180.6
129.0
3.2
62.3
86.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Remark:


Saraburi
Project:
Location:
Depth
To
Soil Description
Unit
Unit

C=Clay
t/m2
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Pile Dia.(m.) :
0.40
Area:
0.126
m2
Perimeter :
1.600
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
1.53
vo
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
'tip
'tip
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
Corr.
kN/m2
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
t/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
tons
0.0
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
CL
2.0
19.62
20
13
2.00
2.00
19.62
1.00
9.81
7.89
0.55
73.0
5.0
9.2
8.0
8.0
5.0
0.0
17.2
6.9
2.0
CL
2.0
19.62
12
20
15
4.00
3.53
34.63
2.77
27.12
9.15
0.50
86.4
5.2
10.9
8.4
16.4
10.3
0.3
18.9
10.8
3.0
CL
2.0
19.62
15
22
17
6.00
4.53
44.44
4.03
39.53
10.83
0.46
103.5
5.7
13.0
9.1
25.5
15.9
0.6
21.5
15.2
4.0
CL
2.1
20.21
20
26
22
8.06
5.59
54.84
5.06
49.64
13.83
0.40
132.6
6.4
16.7
10.2
35.7
22.3
0.9
26.0
20.6
5.0
CL
2.1
20.21
25
30
27
10.12
6.65
65.24
6.12
60.04
16.72
0.37
160.6
7.0
20.2
11.3
47.0
29.4
1.2
30.3
26.4
7.5
CL
2.1
20.40
30
31
30
15.32
9.35
91.72
8.00
78.48
18.88
0.35
185.2
7.6
23.3
30.4
77.3
48.3
2.0
51.7
39.5
9.0
SC
2.1
20.60
44
41
43
18.47
11.00
107.91
10.18
99.82
26.96
0.31
261.1
9.6
32.8
23.0
100.4
62.7
2.4
53.4
52.3
10.5
SC
2.0
19.62
43
38
41
21.47
12.50
122.63
11.75
115.27
25.83
0.31
253.9
9.3
31.9
22.3
122.7
76.7
2.9
51.4
60.7
12.0
SC
2.0
19.42
50
42
47
24.44
13.97
137.05
13.24
129.84
29.53
0.30
290.2
10.2
36.5
24.4
147.1
91.9
3.3
57.5
72.1
13.5
CL
2.0
19.42
60
48
56
27.41
15.44
151.47
14.71
144.26
34.93
0.29
341.8
11.5
43.0
27.6
174.6
109.1
3.8
66.8
85.5
15.0
SG
2.1
20.11
70
53
64
30.49
17.02
166.92
16.23
159.19
40.20
0.29
392.3
13.2
49.3
31.7
206.4
129.0
4.2
76.8
100.6
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Remark:


Saraburi
Project:
Location:
Depth
To
Soil Description
Unit
Unit

C=Clay
t/m2
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Pile Dia.(m.) :
0.50
Area:
0.196
m2
Perimeter :
2.000
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
1.53
vo
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
'tip
'tip
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
Corr.
kN/m2
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
t/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
tons
0.0
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
CL
2.0
19.62
20
13
2.00
2.00
19.62
1.00
9.81
7.89
0.55
73.0
5.0
14.3
10.1
10.1
5.0
0.0
24.4
9.8
2.0
CL
2.0
19.62
12
20
15
4.00
3.53
34.63
2.77
27.12
9.15
0.50
86.4
5.2
17.0
10.5
20.5
10.3
0.5
27.0
14.8
3.0
CL
2.0
19.62
15
22
17
6.00
4.53
44.44
4.03
39.53
10.83
0.46
103.5
5.7
20.3
11.4
31.9
15.9
0.9
30.7
20.5
4.0
CL
2.1
20.21
20
26
22
8.06
5.59
54.84
5.06
49.64
13.83
0.40
132.6
6.4
26.0
12.8
44.6
22.3
1.4
37.4
27.7
5.0
CL
2.1
20.21
25
30
27
10.12
6.65
65.24
6.12
60.04
16.72
0.37
160.6
7.0
31.5
14.1
58.7
29.4
1.9
43.8
35.4
7.5
CL
2.1
20.40
30
31
30
15.32
9.35
91.72
8.00
78.48
18.88
0.35
185.2
7.6
36.4
37.9
96.7
48.3
3.1
71.3
52.0
9.0
SC
2.1
20.60
44
41
43
18.47
11.00
107.91
10.18
99.82
26.96
0.31
261.1
9.6
51.3
28.8
125.5
62.7
3.8
76.3
69.2
10.5
SC
2.0
19.62
43
38
41
21.47
12.50
122.63
11.75
115.27
25.83
0.31
253.9
9.3
49.9
27.9
153.4
76.7
4.5
73.3
79.5
12.0
SC
2.0
19.42
50
42
47
24.44
13.97
137.05
13.24
129.84
29.53
0.30
290.2
10.2
57.0
30.5
183.8
91.9
5.2
82.3
94.3
13.5
CL
2.0
19.42
60
48
56
27.41
15.44
151.47
14.71
144.26
34.93
0.29
341.8
11.5
67.1
34.5
218.3
109.1
5.9
95.7
111.8
15.0
SG
2.1
20.11
70
53
64
30.49
17.02
166.92
16.23
159.19
40.20
0.29
392.3
13.2
77.1
39.7
257.9
129.0
6.6
110.1
131.4
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Remark:


Saraburi
Project:
Location:
Depth
To
Soil Description
Unit
Unit

C=Clay
t/m2
Borehole No.:
BH-1
Pile Dia.(m.) :
0.60
Area:
0.283
m2
Perimeter :
2.400
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
1.53
vo
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
'tip
'tip
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
Corr.
kN/m2
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
t/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
tons
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
CL
2.0
19.62
20
13
2.00
2.00
19.62
1.00
9.81
7.89
0.55
73.0
5.0
20.6
12.1
12.1
5.0
0.0
32.7
13.1
2.0
CL
2.0
19.62
12
20
15
4.00
3.53
34.63
2.77
27.12
9.15
0.50
86.4
5.2
24.4
12.6
24.6
10.3
0.7
36.3
19.3
3.0
CL
2.0
19.62
15
22
17
6.00
4.53
44.44
4.03
39.53
10.83
0.46
103.5
5.7
29.3
13.6
38.2
15.9
1.4
41.5
26.5
4.0
CL
2.1
20.21
20
26
22
8.06
5.59
54.84
5.06
49.64
13.83
0.40
132.6
6.4
37.5
15.3
53.6
22.3
2.0
50.8
35.6
5.0
CL
2.1
20.21
25
30
27
10.12
6.65
65.24
6.12
60.04
16.72
0.37
160.6
7.0
45.4
16.9
70.5
29.4
2.7
59.6
45.3
7.5
CL
2.1
20.40
30
31
30
15.32
9.35
91.72
8.00
78.48
18.88
0.35
185.2
7.6
52.4
45.5
116.0
48.3
4.4
93.5
65.6
9.0
SC
2.1
20.60
44
41
43
18.47
11.00
107.91
10.18
99.82
26.96
0.31
261.1
9.6
73.9
34.5
150.5
62.7
5.4
103.0
87.6
10.5
SC
2.0
19.62
43
38
41
21.47
12.50
122.63
11.75
115.27
25.83
0.31
253.9
9.3
71.8
33.5
184.0
76.7
6.4
98.9
99.8
118.1
12.0
SC
2.0
19.42
50
42
47
24.44
13.97
137.05
13.24
129.84
29.53
0.30
290.2
10.2
82.1
36.6
220.6
91.9
7.5
111.2
13.5
CL
2.0
19.42
60
48
56
27.41
15.44
151.47
14.71
144.26
34.93
0.29
341.8
11.5
96.7
41.3
261.9
109.1
8.5
129.5
140.1
15.0
SG
2.1
20.11
70
53
64
30.49
17.02
166.92
16.23
159.19
40.20
0.29
392.3
13.2
111.0
47.6
309.5
129.0
9.5
149.1
164.4
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
392.3
129.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Remark:

Appendix C
Pile Calculation
Sample sheet
Location:
Nong Saeng Power Plant - Saraburi

Factory Area
Borehole No.:
BH-2
Project:
Soil Description
Depth
Avg.
USCS S=Sand
To
Depth
C=Clay
Unit
Unit
Weight Weight
t/m^3
Pile size :
0.25
Area:
0.063
m2
Perimeter :
1.000
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
-0.80
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
vo
'tip
'tip
0.25
m.
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
t/m2
kN/m^3
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
Corr.
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
0.0
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
tons
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CH
3.0
1.50
2.12
20.80
15
0.59
6.36
3.36
32.96
1.68
16.48
2.25
1.00
183.9
2.3
11.5
6.8
6.8
6.8
0.0
18.2
7.3
CH
7.0
3.50
2.12
20.80
15
17
0.90
14.84
7.84
76.91
5.60
54.94
3.75
0.95
200.7
3.6
12.5
14.2
21.0
21.0
0.6
32.9
13.2
CL
13.5
6.75
2.12
20.80
24
19
1.25
28.62
15.12
148.33
11.48
112.62
6.00
0.64
231.2
3.8
14.5
25.0
45.9
45.9
1.6
58.8
23.5
SM
16.0
8.00
2.13
20.90
51
38
1.36
33.95
17.95
176.04
16.53
162.18
12.75
28
0.50
22
451.0
6.8
28.2
17.0
63.0
63.0
2.0
89.2
35.7
SP
17.5
8.75
2.13
20.90
80
56
1.42
37.14
19.64
192.67
18.79
184.35
20.00
42
80
0.50
34
676.2
12.5
42.3
18.7
81.7
81.7
2.2
121.8
48.7
SP-SM
18.5
9.25
2.13
20.90
100
68
1.46
39.27
20.77
203.75
20.21
198.21
25.00
51
108
0.50
41
822.0
17.4
51.4
17.4
99.1
99.1
2.3
148.2
59.3
Remark:

Location:

Factory Area
Borehole No.:
BH-2
Project:
Soil Description
Depth
Avg.
USCS S=Sand
To
Depth
C=Clay
Unit
Unit
Weight Weight
t/m^3
Pile size :
0.30
Area:
0.090
m2
Perimeter :
1.200
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
-0.80
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
vo
'tip
'tip
0.30
m.
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
t/m2
kN/m^3
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
Corr.
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
0.0
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
tons
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CH
3.0
1.50
2.12
20.80
15
0.59
6.36
3.36
32.96
1.68
16.48
2.25
1.00
183.9
2.3
16.6
8.1
8.1
6.8
0.0
24.7
9.9
CH
7.0
3.50
2.12
20.80
15
17
0.90
14.84
7.84
76.91
5.60
54.94
3.75
0.95
200.7
3.6
18.1
17.1
25.2
21.0
0.9
42.4
16.9
CL
13.5
6.75
2.12
20.80
24
19
1.25
28.62
15.12
148.33
11.48
112.62
6.00
0.64
231.2
3.8
20.8
30.0
55.1
45.9
2.3
73.7
29.5
SM
16.0
8.00
2.13
20.90
51
38
1.36
33.95
17.95
176.04
16.53
162.18
12.75
28
0.50
22
451.0
6.8
40.6
20.4
75.6
63.0
2.8
113.3
45.3
SP
17.5
8.75
2.13
20.90
80
56
1.42
37.14
19.64
192.67
18.79
184.35
20.00
42
80
0.50
34
676.2
12.5
60.9
22.5
98.0
81.7
3.1
155.8
62.3
SP-SM
18.5
9.25
2.13
20.90
100
68
1.46
39.27
20.77
203.75
20.21
198.21
25.00
51
108
0.50
41
822.0
17.4
74.0
20.9
119.0
99.1
3.3
189.6
75.8
Remark:

Location:

Factory Area
Borehole No.:
BH-2
Project:
Soil Description
Depth
Avg.
USCS S=Sand
To
Depth
C=Clay
Unit
Unit
Weight Weight
t/m^3
Pile size :
0.35
Area:
0.123
m2
Perimeter :
1.400
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
-0.80
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
vo
'tip
'tip
0.35
m.
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
t/m2
kN/m^3
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
Corr.
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
tons
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CH
3.0
1.50
2.12
20.80
15
0.59
6.36
3.36
32.96
1.68
16.48
2.25
1.00
183.9
2.3
22.5
9.5
9.5
6.8
0.0
32.0
12.8
CH
7.0
3.50
2.12
20.80
15
17
0.90
14.84
7.84
76.91
5.60
54.94
3.75
0.95
200.7
3.6
24.6
19.9
29.3
21.0
1.2
52.8
21.1
CL
13.5
6.75
2.12
20.80
24
19
1.25
28.62
15.12
148.33
11.48
112.62
6.00
0.64
231.2
3.8
28.3
35.0
64.3
45.9
3.1
89.5
35.8
SM
16.0
8.00
2.13
20.90
51
38
1.36
33.95
17.95
176.04
16.53
162.18
12.75
28
0.50
22
451.0
6.8
55.2
23.8
88.2
63.0
3.8
139.6
55.8
SP
17.5
8.75
2.13
20.90
80
56
1.42
37.14
19.64
192.67
18.79
184.35
20.00
42
80
0.50
34
676.2
12.5
82.8
26.2
114.4
81.7
4.3
193.0
77.2
SP-SM
18.5
9.25
2.13
20.90
100
68
1.46
39.27
20.77
203.75
20.21
198.21
25.00
51
108
0.50
41
822.0
17.4
100.7
24.4
138.8
99.1
4.6
234.9
94.0
Remark:

Location:

Factory Area
Borehole No.:
BH-2
Project:
Soil Description
Depth
Avg.
USCS S=Sand
To
Depth
C=Clay
Unit
Unit
Weight Weight
t/m^3
Pile size :
0.40
Area:
0.160
m2
Perimeter :
1.600
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water =
-0.80
SPT (N-value)
Field
Liao
vo
'tip
'tip
0.40
m.
from ground level
'ave
'ave
Su
Nq
Ks
t/m2
kN/m^3
Adh.
qb
qs
Qb
Qs
Factor
Corr.
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
kN/m2
t/m2
0.80
Qs
Qs
Wp
Qu
Qa
tons
tons
tons
Cumm. Cumm.
t/m2
t/m2
tons
tons
tons
t/m. peri
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CH
3.0
1.50
2.12
20.80
15
0.59
6.36
3.36
32.96
1.68
16.48
2.25
1.00
183.9
2.3
29.4
10.8
10.8
6.8
0.0
40.2
16.1
CH
7.0
3.50
2.12
20.80
15
17
0.90
14.84
7.84
76.91
5.60
54.94
3.75
0.95
200.7
3.6
32.1
22.7
33.5
21.0
1.5
64.1
25.6
CL
13.5
6.75
2.12
20.80
24
19
1.25
28.62
15.12
148.33
11.48
112.62
6.00
0.64
231.2
3.8
37.0
40.0
73.5
45.9
4.0
106.5
42.6
SM
16.0
8.00
2.13
20.90
51
38
1.36
33.95
17.95
176.04
16.53
162.18
12.75
28
0.50
22
451.0
6.8
72.2
27.3
100.8
63.0
5.0
167.9
67.2
SP
17.5
8.75
2.13
20.90
80
56
1.42
37.14
19.64
192.67
18.79
184.35
20.00
42
80
0.50
34
676.2
12.5
108.2
30.0
130.7
81.7
5.6
233.3
93.3
SP-SM
18.5
9.25
2.13
20.90
100
68
1.46
39.27
20.77
203.75
20.21
198.21
25.00
51
108
0.50
41
822.0
17.4
131.5
27.9
158.6
99.1
6.0
284.2
113.7
Remark:

RECOMMENDED ALLOWABLE LOAD FOR SINGLE SQUARE DRIVEN PILE
Location:

Factory Area
Borehole No.:
BH-2
Factor of safety :
2.50
Depth of water :
-0.80
Project:
Depth
30x30 cm. square Driven Pile
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
Cumm.Skin
Friction
End
Bearing
Pile
Weight
Allowable
Load
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
(tons)
13.5
46
14
24
55
21
29
64
28
36
73
37
43
16.0
63
28
36
76
41
45
88
55
56
101
72
67
17.5
82
42
49
98
61
62
114
83
77
131
108
93
18.5
99
51
59
119
74
76
139
101
94
159
132
114
(meters)
LOCATION :

Factory Area
BOREHOLE NO.:
BH-2
PROJECT :
Cumm. Ultimate Skin Friction

(t/m of Perimeter)
20
40
60
80
100
120
10
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
Ultimate End Bearing

(t/sq.m)
200
400
600
800
1,000
10
12
12
14
14
16
16
18
18
20
20
CUMMULATIVE ULTIMATE SKIN FRICTION AND ULTIMATE END BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH OF SINGLE SQUARE DRIVEN PILE
Appendix D
Bearing Capacity and
Shallow Foundation
Sample sheet data
SPT Correlation Program - NovoSPT(Pro) 1.8.0.51

Novo Tech Software Ltd.
www.NovotechSoftware.com
Developed by : Alireza Afkhami-Aghda
This copy of program is licensed to : Poosit Sunlakaviset
all calculations are done for SPT blow count N60=15 at depth 7.92 m; Corrected SPT N1(60)~13 after Liao and Whitman 1986
Table i : Input data and assumptions.
Table ii : Soil layers from existing ground.
Input Parameter
Footing B (m)
Footing L (m)
Footing Df (m)
Footing P (kPa)
Safety factor FS
Apply ground water
ti water level
Ground
(Pile
) length (m)
Pile diameter (m)
Thickness
( )
3
Unit
W
16.5i ht
4.3
5
18.7
17.5
Value
1
1
0.9
100
3
No
5
0.4
Table iii : In-situ SPT test results.

Depth (m)
0.3
0.61
0.91
1.22
1.52
1.83
2.13
2.44
2.74
3.05
3.35
3.66
3.96
4.27
4.57
4.88
5.18
5.49
5.79
6.1
6.4
6.71
7.01
7.32
7.62
7.92
SPT
N60
Bl
C 32
34
12
11
18
17
26
25
23
22
25
24
43
41
22
21
21
20
17
16
18
17
20
19
19
18
25
24
23
22
24
23
25
24
22
21
24
23
24
23
26
25
28
26
18
17
20
19
24
23
16
15
Table 16 : Young's Modulus (Es).

Source
Schultze and Muhs, 1967
Young's Modulus Es Comments

(kPa)
36409
Sand
Ref#
Var.
41
N1(60)
D'Appolonia et al., 1970
35772
Sand (normally consolidated)
41
N1(60)
Tan et al., 1991
15000
Bowles, 1996 and Denver, 1982
27111
25
N60
Bowles, 1996
90000
25
N60
Bowles, 1996
50099
25
N60
Bowles, 1996
7500
Sand (saturated)
25
N60
Bowles, 1996
41250
Sands (all normally consolidated): average value
25
N60
Bowles, 1996
55750
Sand (over consolidated) OCR=1
25
N60
Bowles, 1996
25200
Gravelly sand
25
N60
Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990
7500
Sands with fines
N60
15000
Clean sands (normally consolidated)
N60
22500
Clean sands (over consolidated)
N60
Tan et al., 1991
12600
Gravelly sand
N60
Tan et al., 1991
9600
Clayey sand
N60
Tan et al., 1991
6300
Silts, sandy silt, or clayey silt
N60
Ghahramani and Behpoor, 1989
2550
Saturated clays, N60<25
Skempton, 1986
23550
Papadopoulos, 1992
19500
25
N60
Mezenbach, 1961
10150
Fine sand (above water level)
25
N60
Mezenbach, 1961
14450
Fine sand (below water level)
25
N60
Mezenbach, 1961
10650
Sand (medium)
25
N60
Mezenbach, 1961
19550
Coarse sand
25
N60
Mezenbach, 1961
22000
Sand and gravel
25
N60
Mezenbach, 1961
10350
Silty sand
25
N60
Mezenbach, 1961
9900
Silt
25
N60
Stroud, 1988
~ 7500 to 30000
Weak rocks
47
N60
N60
N60
N60
Table 17 : Undrained Shear Strength (Su) of Clays.

Source
Terzaghi and Peck, 1967
Undrained shear
strength Su (kPa)
98
Comments
Ref#
Var.
Meyerhof, 1956
150
N60
Peck et al., 1974
75
N1(60)
Ghahramani and Behpoor, 1989
112
based on over 100 data in Iran, N60<25
N60
Decourt, 1989
158
from triaxial UU tests
47
N60
Stroud, 1974
68
Insensitive overconsolidated clays
47
N60
Stroud, 1989
68
PI=15%
N60
Stroud, 1989
82
PI=50%
N60
Stroud, 1989
75
In-sensitive weak rock with N60<200
N60
Sowers, 1979
~ 38 to 69
Clayey sands (SC) and Silts (ML)
N60
Sowers, 1979
~ 69 to 150
Lean clays (CL)
N60
Sowers, 1979
~ 150 to 259
Fat clays (CH)
N60
Stroud and Butler, 1975
~ 60 to 90
valid for N60>5
N60
Japanese Road Association
valid for N60<5
N60
Reese, Touma and O'Neill, 1976
105
90
30
N60
Hara et al., 1974
204
30
N60
Ajayi and Balogun, 1988
95
39
N60
Hatef and Keshavarz, 2004
104
N60
105
based on 482 SPT and unconfined compression tests in Shiraz

city (Iran)
for clays in Brazil
39
Tavares, 1988
39
N60
Source
Correction Factor
Comments
Ref#
Var.
Skempton, 1986
Borehole Diameter Factor, Cb
Skempton, 1986
Sampling Method Factor, Cs
N60
Skempton, 1986
0.94
Rod Length Factor, Cr
N60
Skempton, 1986
Energy Ratio Factor, Ce
N60
N60
N60
Table 18 : Other Correction Factors.
N60
Table 19 : Depth Correction Factor (Cn).

Source
Gibbs and Holtz, 1957
Depth Correction
Factor Cn
1.64
Comments
Ref#
Samson et al., 1986
0.82
N60
Peck and Bazaraa, 1969
0.85
N60
Peck, Hanson and Thornburn, 1974 0.88
N60
Seed, 1976
0.8
N60
Tokimatsu and Yoshimi, 1983
0.8
N60
Liao and Whitman, 1986
0.83
N60
Skempton, 1986
0.82
N60
Canadian Foundation Engineering

Manual, 2006
0.87
equation by Teng, 1962
Var.
N60
4th Edition
N60
Table 20 : Relative Density (Dr) of Sands.

Source
Relative Density (%) Comments
Gibbs and Holtz, 1957
59.8
Meyerhof, 1957
54
Yoshida et al., 1988
48
Idriss and Boulanger, 2003
52.2
Skempton, 1986
Ref#
Linear Interpolation
Var.
N60
with Co=25, C1=0.12, C2=0.46
N60
19
N1(60)
47.7
Fine sands
42
N1(60)
Skempton, 1986
43.9
Coarse sands
42
N1(60)
Cubrinovski and Ishihara, 1999
56.7
All sands
42
N1(60)
49.5
Clean sands
42
N1(60)
69.4
Silty sands
42
N1(60)
Table 21 : Bearing Capacity of Footings on Sands (qa).

Source
Burland and Burbidge, 1985
Allowable Bearing
Capacity qa (kPa)
662.77
Comments
Ref#
Var.
Terzaghi
247.57
T=2.23, based on 25 mm allowable settlement
N60(ave)
Meyerhof, 1976
390
Parry, 1977
490.91
in cohesionless soils (valid for Df<B)
Peck et al., 1974
132.71
in cohesionless soils
Ng from Brinch and Hansen 1970, Nq from Bowles 1996, Fi from

Hatanaka and Uchida, 1996
Table 22 : Settlement of Footing on Sands (S).

Source
Settlement (cm)
Comments
modified Meyerhof, 1965
0.36
revised method after Meyerhof, 1956
N60ave
modified Meyerhof (based on

Terzaghi and Peck)
Terzaghi and Peck, 1967
for sands, B>1.2 m
N60ave
Peck and Bazaraa, 1969
0.2
0.61
Ref#
Var.
N60ave
N60ave
valid for B>0.9 m
N60ave
0.28
for normally consolidates sands
N60ave
0.03
for over consolidates sands
N60ave
Duncan and Buchignani, 1976
0.65
modified from Meyerhof 1965, for 1 year time effect
N60ave
Alpan, 1964
1.53
Anagnostropoulos et al., 1991
0.28
database of 150 cases
N60ave
N1(60)
Table 23 : Becker Hammer Test (BPT).

Source
Comments
Ref#
Var.
Harder and Seed, 1986
Equivalent BPT
(Nb30)
15
does not consider friction of casing
15
N60
Alex Sy and Campanella, 1994
36
Rs = 0 kN
15,18
N60
20
Rs = 45 kN
15,18
N60
12
Rs = 90 kN
15,18
N60
Rs = 135 kN
15,18
N60
Rs = 180 kN
15,18
N60
Rs = 225 kN
15,18
N60
Rs = 270 kN
15,18
N60
Rs = 315 kN
15,18
N60
Rs = 360 kN
15,18
N60
Comments
Ref#
Var.
University of California, Davis
Cyclic Stress Ratio

(CSR)
0.14
based on on-going works
19
N1(60)
Chinese Code
0.2
uses 0.833*N1(60)
N1(60)
Kokusho
0.23
uses 0.833*N1(60)
N1(60)
Seed
0.24
uses 0.833*N1(60)
N1(60)
Shibata
0.25
uses 0.833*N1(60)
N1(60)
Tokimatsu
0.22
uses 0.833*N1(60)
N1(60)
NCEER 1997 Workshop
0.14
for clean sand
N1(60)
Source
Consistency
Comments
Meyerhof, 1965
Stiff
for fine-grained soils
N60
Meyerhof, 1965
Medium
for coarse-grained soils
N60
Table 24 : Liquefaction (CRR).

Source
Table 25 : Consistency.
Ref#
Var.
Table 26 : Friction Angle of Sands.

Source
Comments
Ref#
Peck et al., 1953
Internal Friction
Angle (deg)
29.1
N60
Terzaghi, Peck and Mesri, 1996
35
Fine-grained sands
23,27
N60
Terzaghi, Peck and Mesri, 1996
31.8
Coarse-grained sands
23,27
N60
34.7
for Sands
N1(60)
35.8
30
N1(60)
Ohsaki et al., 1959
32.3
N60
JRA, 1990
30
for N60>5 , Fi<=45
N60
Dunham, 1954
38.4
Angular and well-graded soils
N60
Dunham, 1954
33.4
Round and well-graded OR Angular and uniform-graded soils
N60
Dunham, 1954
28.4
Round and uniform-garded soils
N60
Shioi and Fukui, 1954
25.8
in general
N70
30.2
for roads and bridges
N70
31.6
for buildings
N70
Meyerhof, 1959
35.2
Dr from Yoshida, 1988
is not recommended for shallow depths (less than 1 to 2 metres)
Var.
N60
12
N1(60)
Kampengsen
36.7
24
N60
Kampengsen
38.3
24
N1(60)
Chonburi
35.4
24
N60
Chonburi
35.7
24
N1(60)
Ayuthaya
36.2
24
N60
Ayuthaya
34.7
24
N1(60)
Wolff, 1989
30.8
30
N1(60)
35.4
Moh, Chin, Lin and Woo, 1989
32.7
Halanakar and Uchida, 1996
32.8
Duncan, 2004
45
Duncan, 2004
Duncan, 2004
an approximation based on Peck et al., 1974
N60
granular soils in Taipei
33
N1(60)
25
N1(60)
Gravel, Cu>4
45
Dr
38.6
Sand, Cu<6
45
Dr
43.6
Sand, Cu>6
45
Dr
Table 27 : Shear Wave Velocity (Vs).

Source
Vs (m/s)
Comments
Kanai et al., 1966
96
for all soils
Ref#
Var.
Imai et al., 1975
227
for all soils
N60
Imai, 1977
212
Holocene clay
N1(60)
Imai, 1977
187
Holocene sand
N1(60)
Imai, 1977
237
Pleistocene clay
N1(60)
Imai, 1977
218
Pleistocene sand
N1(60)
Imai and Yoshimura, 1970
186
for all soils
N60
Imai and Yoshimura, 1975
224
from 192 samples
N60
Imai and Tonouchi, 1982
176
for gravelly soils
N60
207
for all soils
N60
Ohta et al., 1972
231
for sands
N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978
85
for Holocene clays
34
N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978
91
for Holocene sands
34
N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978
97
for Holocene sands and gravels
34
N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978
123
for Holocene gravels
34
N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978
110
for Pleistocene clays
34
N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978
118
for Pleistocene sands
34
N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978
127
for Pleistocene sands and gravels
34
N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978
160
for Pleistocene gravels
34
N60
JRA, 1980
247
for clays
40
N60
JRA, 1980
197
for sands
40
N60
Ohba and Toriuma, 1970
186
Iyisan
208
13
N60
N60
N1(60)
Tomio Inazaki, 2006
254
Public Works Research Institute of Japan
Baziar, Fallah, Razeghi and

Khorasani
Okamota et1998
al., 1989
413
for all soils in Iran (function of depth)
N1(60)
267
Pleistocene sand
N1(60)
Tamura and Yamazaki, 2002
246
function of depth
Ulugergerli and Uyanik, 2004
~ 63 to 469
Clay, slit and gravel in western Turkey
31
N60
Jafari, Shafiee and Razmkhak,

2002
195
Clayey soils in Tehran (uses N60)
35
N60
177
Silty soils in Tehran (uses N60)
35
N60
190
Fine-grained soils in Tehran (uses N60)
35
N60
220
for all soils
Yokota et al., 1991
251
for all soils
N60
Lee, 1990
333
for clays
N60
Lee, 1990
252
for silts
N60
Lee, 1990
215
for sands
N60
Sykora and Stokoe, 1983
219
N60
Seed et al., 1983
217
for sands
N60
Seed and Idriss, 1981
236
for all soils
N60
Shibata, 1970
124
for sands
N60
Ohsaki and Iwazaki, 1973
211
N60
Ohsaki and Iwazaki, 1973
236
for all soils
Anbazhagan and Sitharam, 2008
214
based on 58 sites in Banglore
2002
2002
Jafari et al., 1997
36
N60
N1(60)
N60
N60
43
N1(60)
Table 28 : Shear Modulus (Gmax).

Reference
Shear Modulus
Gmax (MPa)
173
Comments
Ref#
Var.
Seed, Idriss and Arango, 1983
98
37
N1(60)
Anbazhagan, Sitharam and Diryac,

2007
Wroth et al., 1979
66
data gathered from Turkey
37
N1(60)
105
based on Ohsaki and Iwasaki, 1973
44
N60
Ohsaki and Iwasaki, 1973
97
38
N60
Seed et al., 1986
124
using Japanese data
38
N1(60)
Seed et al., 1986
103
46
N60
Randolph, 1981
15
44
N60
N60
is conservative
Table 29 : Bearing Capacity of Piles.

Ref#
Var.
GEO, 1996 and Yau 2000
Unit Ultimate Bearing Comments

of Pile (kPa)
16
fs for bored piles in saprolites
10
N60
Meyerhof, 1976
22
fs for small displacement piles (bored)
28
N60
Meyerhof, 1976
45
fs for large displacement piles (driven)
28
N60
Yves Robert, 1997
28
fs in granular soil
28
N60
Quiros and Reese, 1977
56
fs for drilled piles
46
N60
Reese and Wright, 1977
42
fs for drilled piles
46
N60
Reese and O'Neill, 1988
192
fs for drilled piles (beta method, function of depth)
46
Hassan and O'Neill, 1994
192
fs for drilled piles (modified beta method, function of depth)
46
N60
Meyerhof, 1976
1502
qp for small displacement piles (bored) with upper limit cut-off
28
N1(60)
Meyerhof, 1976
5008
qp for large displacement piles (driven) with upper limit cut-off
28
N1(60)
Yves Robert, 1997
1440
qp for bored piles in granular soil
28
N1(60)
Yves Robert, 1997
2379
qp for driven piles in granular soil
28
N1(60)
Reese and O'Neill, 1988
900
qp with upper limit of 4300 KPa in drilled shafts
46
N60
Detta et al., 1980
~ 2625 to 8750
qp in calcareous sands
39
N60
Reese and Wright, 1977
958
qp for drilled piles
46
N60
Source
Table 30 : Misc..
Source
Value
Parameter
Ref#
Var.
Meyerhof, 1965
CPT tip resistance (qc), in MPa
N60
J. Fred Triggs and Paul D.

Simpson, 1990
Stroud, 1989
25
Wildcat Dynamic Penetrometer blow counts /10cm
N60
~ 133.12 E-6
mv for PI=15%, in 1/kPa
N1(60)
Stroud, 1989
~ 199.68 E-6
mv for PI=50%, in 1/kPa
N1(60)
Ohya, 1982
5424
Pressuremeter horizontal modulus (E_PMT) in sands, in kPa
N60
17.3
Saturated unit weight for Sands, in kN/m3
N60
18.9
Saturated unit weight for Clays, in kN/m3
N60
Ulugergerli and Uyanik, 2004
~ 16.6 to 19.4
N60
Ziaie Moayed and Naeini, 2006
106.1
Unit weight for clay, slit and gravel in western Turkey (using
average Vs), in kN/m3
Modulus of subgrade reaction Ks30 in gravely soils, in MN/m3
Mayne and Kemper, 1984
6.2
Over Consolidation Ratio (OCR) for clays
Muayed Ismail, 2008
~ 1.3 E-3
Schnaid et al., 2004
29
N1(60)
D10 for granular soil near Baghdad N60<35, in mm
32
N60
~ 55.2 to 124.3
initial stiffness modulus (Go) for un-cemented soils, in MPa
47
N60
Schnaid et al., 2004
~ 124.3 to 331.5
initial stiffness modulus (Go) for cemented soils, in MPa
47
N60
Sandorni, 1991
20.6
operational stiffness modulus (E) for cemented soils, in MPa
47
N60
N60
APPENDIX E
Sample Sheet for
Long Term Settlement Calculation
Materials
Stiff Clay
Very Stiff Clay
VEHICLE LOAD
EMBANKMENT LOAD 1
Height 5.0 m.
P.O. Box 69
2600 AB Delft
Phone
+31 15 261 08 21
+31 15 269 35 00
Very Stiff Clay

Fax
date
MSettle 7.3 : RoadWidth12.0m.sli
30/10/2009
Sand
Annex
100.000
0.000
2
1
Sand
PGS Power Plant Nongsaeng

Road width 12.0 m.. Settlement Prediction
Input View
Stiff Clay
105.921730
P.O. Box 69
Loading [kPa]
105.921725
2600 AB Delft

Height 5.0 m.
Time-History
105.921720
105.921715
10
100
1000
10000
1000
10000
Time [days]
Phone
+31 15 261 08 21
+31 15 269 35 00
0.200000
Settlement [m]
Fax
0.000000
0.400000
0.600000
0.800000
date
30/10/2009
Annex
1.000000
Vertical 2 (X = 50.000 m; Z = 0.000 m)

Method = Isotache with Terzaghi (Natural strain)
10
100
Depth = 0.000 (-) [m]

Settlement after 10000 days = 1.082 [m]
2.633325
P.O. Box 69
Loading [kPa]
2.633320
2600 AB Delft

Height 5.0 m.
Time-History
2.633315
2.633310
10
100
1000
10000
1000
10000
Time [days]
Phone
+31 15 261 08 21
+31 15 269 35 00
0.100000
Settlement [m]
Fax
0.000000
0.200000
0.300000
date
30/10/2009
Annex
0.400000
Vertical 1 (X = 34.000 m; Z = 0.000 m)

Method = Isotache with Terzaghi (Natural strain)
10
100
Depth = 0.000 (-) [m]

Settlement after 10000 days = 0.453 [m]
Report for MSettle 7.3
Filename:
Date of calculation:
Time of calculation:
Date of report:
Time of report:
D:\..\00-IPP-PhaseII\01-Soil-Report\SettlementAnalysis\RoadWidth12.0m
30/10/2009
12:36:06
30/10/2009
12:58:40
Settlement Calculations
Developed by GeoDelft
Project identification:

Height 5.0 m.
1 Echo of the Input

1.1 Layer Boundaries
Boundary number
3 -X3 -Y2 -X2 -Y1 -X1 -Y0 -X0 -Y0.000
0.000
0.000
-6.000
0.000
-16.000
0.000
-18.600
OCR
[-]
1
1
1
PL-line
bottom
1
1
1
Vert. consolid.
coefficient Cv
[m2/s]
7.31E-08
7.31E-08
1.00E-01
Co-ordinates [m]
100.000
0.000
100.000
-6.000
100.000
-16.000
100.000
-18.600
PL-line
top
1.30
1.30
1.30
X co-ordinates [m]
34.000
50.000
Secular
comp. index
b [-]
1.000E-01
1.000E-01
1.000E-01
0.000
Secular
comp. rate
c [-]
5.000E-03
5.000E-03
5.000E-03
Unit weight
Unsaturated
Saturated
[kN/m]
[kN/m]
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
21.00
21.00
Material name
Stiff Clay
Very Stiff Clay
Sand
1.2 Soil Profiles

Layer
number
3
2
1
Direct
comp. index
a [-]
1.000E-02
1.000E-02
1.000E-02
POP
[kN/m]
No
No
Yes
Drained
1.3 Soil Properties

Layer
number
3
2
1
Layer
number
3
2
1
Layer
number
3
2
1
1.4 Verticals
Vertical number
1-3
D:\..\SettlementAnalysis\RoadWidth12.0m
Calculation cross section at Z = 0.000 m
30/10/2009
MSettle 7.3
Page 2
2 Results per Vertical
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.981
1.962
2.943
3.924
4.905
14.715
24.525
34.335
44.145
53.955
87.293
101.637
115.825
129.847
143.702
157.391
170.920
184.297
197.530
210.630
223.605
2.633
4.733
6.837
8.949
11.078
13.229
14.425
15.649
16.898
18.170
19.461
32.882
46.549
60.215
73.810
87.293
S-eff.
[kN/m]
2.633
4.733
6.837
8.949
11.078
13.229
15.406
17.611
19.841
22.094
24.366
47.597
71.074
94.550
117.955
141.248
53.955
63.765
73.575
83.385
93.195
103.005
112.815
122.625
132.435
142.245
152.055
Final stress
S-water
[kN/m]
0.000
2.100
4.200
6.300
8.400
10.500
11.619
12.738
13.857
14.976
16.095
27.285
38.475
49.665
60.855
72.045
141.248
165.402
189.400
213.232
236.897
260.396
283.735
306.922
329.965
352.875
375.660
S-total
[kN/m]
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.981
1.962
2.943
3.924
4.905
14.715
24.525
34.335
44.145
53.955
72.045
84.235
96.425
108.615
120.805
132.995
145.185
157.375
169.565
181.755
193.945
223.605
231.918
239.002
246.048
254.225
S-eff.
[kN/m]
0.000
2.100
4.200
6.300
8.400
10.500
12.600
14.700
16.800
18.900
21.000
42.000
63.000
84.000
105.000
126.000
53.955
63.765
73.575
83.385
93.195
103.005
112.815
122.625
132.435
142.245
152.055
152.055
158.922
164.808
170.694
177.561
Initial stress
S-water
[kN/m]
126.000
148.000
170.000
192.000
214.000
236.000
258.000
280.000
302.000
324.000
346.000
375.660
390.840
403.810
416.742
431.786
Page 3
10000
55.86
100.00
MSettle 7.3
Degree of consolidation [%]

10
100
1000
1.78
5.61
17.72
100.00 100.00 100.00
193.945
201.778
208.492
215.206
223.039
1
0.57
100.00
152.055
158.922
164.808
170.694
177.561
Type of drainage
undrained, single drainage
drained
Time
[days]
81066
346.000
360.700
373.300
385.900
400.600
S-total
[kN/m]
2.1 Results for Vertical 1 (X = 34.00 m; Z = 0.00 m)
Depth
[m]
Layer 3
0.00
-0.10
-0.20
-0.30
-0.40
-0.50
-0.60
-0.70
-0.80
-0.90
-1.00
-2.00
-3.00
-4.00
-5.00
-6.00
Layer 2
-6.00
-7.00
-8.00
-9.00
-10.00
-11.00
-12.00
-13.00
-14.00
-15.00
-16.00
Layer 1
-16.00
-16.70
-17.30
-17.90
-18.60
Layers
3-2
1-1
30/10/2009
3 Settlements
3.1 Settlements
Vertical
number
1
2
End of Report
30/10/2009
X co-ordinate
[m]
34.00
50.00
Surface level
[m]
0.00
0.00
Settlement
[m]
0.453
1.082
MSettle 7.3
Page 4
TABLE 1
UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST

Sample Sheet

Boring No.
BH-1
Sample No.
1
Project :
Location.
Testing Date
PR constant
Strain Rate
Deform Reading
: 2.54E-05 mm./div.
13/06/52
0.2262 kg./div.
0.05 mm./min.
Depth, m.
:
:
Wet Dens.:
Height(H), cm.
3.00-3.50
5.65
: 11.83
Init. Area :
Dia.(D), cm.
Soil Weight, gm.
Sample Description:
Water Cont, %
Cap +PR Load, kg. :
Tested by
Dry Dens. :
455.43
9.24
0.208
VERAPOL
sq.cm.
25.04
1.538
1.408
gm/cc
gm/cc
SAMPLE AFTER TEST
Deform.
Load
Strain
Cor.
Axial
Dev.
Tangent
Secant
Area
Load
Stress
Modulus
Modulus
sq.cm
kPa
MPa
0.000
Rdg.
mm.
(div.)
0.0
0.000
20
4.0
0.000
25.04
11
4.4
0.00
40
5.8
0.001
25.04
15
6.0
371.21
692.88
60
7.8
0.001
25.04
19
7.7
412.45
599.40
qu =
46.0
kPa
80
9.4
0.002
25.04
23
9.1
329.96
532.04
cor. qu =
46.4
kPa
100
10.9
0.002
25.04
26
10.5
309.33
487.50
c = qu/2 =
23.0
kPa
120
12.3
0.003
25.04
29
11.7
288.71
454.37
cor. c =
140
13.9
0.003
25.04
33
13.1
329.95
436.59
160
15.3
0.003
25.04
36
14.4
288.70
418.11
180
16.9
0.004
25.04
40
15.8
329.94
408.31
200
18.4
0.004
25.04
43
17.1
309.32
398.41
250
21.2
0.005
25.04
49
19.6
230.95
364.92
300
25.7
0.006
25.04
59
23.6
371.17
365.96
350
29.5
0.008
25.04
67
26.9
313.42
358.46
400
32.9
0.009
25.04
75
30.0
280.42
348.70
450
36.5
0.010
25.04
83
33.1
296.91
342.95
500
40.0
0.011
25.04
91
36.2
288.66
337.52
550
43.0
0.012
25.05
97
38.90
247.41
329.33
600
45.0
0.013
25.05
102
40.67
164.92
315.63
650
47.0
0.014
25.05
106
42.44
164.92
304.03
700
48.7
0.015
25.05
110
43.95
140.17
292.33
750
50.0
0.016
25.05
113
45.10
107.18
279.99
800
51.0
0.017
25.05
115
45.98
82.43
267.64
850
51.0
0.018
25.05
115
45.98
-0.05
251.89
900
51.0
0.019
25.05
115
45.98
-0.05
237.90
950
50.0
0.020
25.05
113
45.10
-82.52
221.03
1000
49.0
0.021
25.05
111
44.21
-82.52
205.85
0.0
Strength
MPa
Properties
0.0
H/D ratio=
2.09
cor.factor =
0.990
2
2.37 T/m
Tangent Modulus at 50 % qu
=
230.95 MPa
Secant Modulus at 50 % qu
=
364.92 MPa
45.0
40.0
35.0
DEVIATER STRESS, kPa
25.04
Summary of
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
STRAIN, %
0.02
0.025

Boring No.
BH-1
Sample No.
1
Project :
Location.
Testing Date
PR constant
Strain Rate
Deform Reading
: 2.54E-05 mm./div.
13/06/52
0.2262 kg./div.
0.05 mm./min.
Depth, m.
:
:
Wet Dens.:
Height(H), cm.
6.00-6.50
5.41
: 12.06
Init. Area :
Dia.(D), cm.
Soil Weight, gm.
Sample Description:
Water Cont, %
Cap +PR Load, kg. :
Tested by
Dry Dens. :
453.36
10.04
0.208
VERAPOL
sq.cm.
22.99
1.635
1.486
gm/cc
gm/cc
SAMPLE AFTER TEST
Deform.
Load
Strain
Cor.
Axial
Dev.
Tangent
Secant
Area
Load
Stress
Modulus
Modulus
sq.cm
kPa
MPa
0.000
Rdg.
mm.
(div.)
0.0
0.000
20
3.6
0.000
22.99
10
4.4
0.00
40
5.5
0.001
22.99
14
6.2
435.41
735.56
60
7.2
0.001
22.99
18
7.8
389.57
620.23
qu =
23.1
kPa
80
8.7
0.002
22.99
21
9.3
343.73
551.11
cor. qu =
23.6
kPa
100
10.1
0.002
22.99
24
10.6
320.82
505.05
c = qu/2 =
11.5
kPa
120
11.2
0.003
22.99
27
11.7
252.06
462.88
cor. c =
140
12.0
0.003
22.99
29
12.5
183.31
422.95
160
13.2
0.003
22.99
31
13.6
274.98
404.45
180
14.0
0.004
22.99
33
14.4
183.31
379.88
200
14.9
0.004
22.99
35
15.3
206.23
362.51
250
15.9
0.005
22.99
37
16.2
91.65
308.34
300
17.0
0.006
22.99
40
17.3
100.81
273.75
350
17.9
0.007
22.99
42
18.2
82.48
246.43
400
18.7
0.008
22.99
44
18.9
73.31
224.79
450
19.0
0.009
22.99
44
19.2
27.48
202.86
500
19.9
0.011
22.99
46
20.1
82.47
190.82
550
20.5
0.012
22.99
48
20.67
54.97
178.47
600
20.9
0.013
22.99
48
21.05
36.64
166.65
650
21.7
0.014
22.99
50
21.83
73.30
159.47
700
22.5
0.015
22.99
52
22.60
73.30
153.32
750
22.9
0.016
22.99
53
22.98
36.64
145.54
800
23.0
0.017
22.99
53
23.08
9.14
137.01
850
23.0
0.018
22.99
53
23.08
-0.02
128.95
900
22.7
0.019
22.99
52
22.79
-27.52
120.26
950
22.0
0.020
22.99
51
22.11
-64.18
110.55
1000
21.0
0.021
22.99
49
21.15
-91.67
100.44
0.0
Strength
MPa
Properties
0.0
H/D ratio=
2.23
cor.factor =
0.976
1.21 T/m2
=
320.82 MPa
=
505.05 MPa
25.0
20.0
22.99
Summary of
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
STRAIN, %
0.02
0.025

Boring No.
BH-1
Sample No.
1
Project :
Location.
Testing Date
PR constant
Strain Rate
Deform Reading
: 2.54E-05 mm./div.
13/06/52
0.2262 kg./div.
0.05 mm./min.
Depth, m.
:
:
Wet Dens.:
Height(H), cm.
7.50-8.00
6.08
: 11.81
Init. Area :
Dia.(D), cm.
Soil Weight, gm.
Sample Description:
Water Cont, %
Cap +PR Load, kg. :
Tested by
Dry Dens. :
663.01
24.97
0.208
VERAPOL
sq.cm.
29.00
1.935
1.549
gm/cc
gm/cc
SAMPLE AFTER TEST
Deform.
Load
Strain
Cor.
Axial
Dev.
Tangent
Secant
Area
Load
Stress
Modulus
Modulus
sq.cm
kPa
MPa
0.000
Rdg.
mm.
(div.)
0.0
0.000
20
4.0
0.000
29.00
11
3.8
0.00
40
6.0
0.001
29.00
15
5.3
355.75
615.40
60
8.5
0.001
29.00
21
7.2
444.68
558.50
qu =
48.1
kPa
80
10.3
0.002
29.00
25
8.6
320.16
498.91
cor. qu =
47.8
kPa
100
12.8
0.002
29.00
30
10.5
444.67
488.06
c = qu/2 =
24.1
kPa
120
14.8
0.003
29.00
35
12.0
355.73
466.01
cor. c =
140
16.0
0.003
29.00
38
12.9
213.43
429.93
160
17.0
0.003
29.00
40
13.7
177.86
398.42
180
20.6
0.004
29.00
48
16.5
640.31
425.30
200
23.2
0.004
29.00
54
18.4
462.44
429.01
250
28.0
0.005
29.00
64
22.1
341.48
411.51
300
36.0
0.006
29.00
82
28.2
569.14
437.78
350
42.0
0.008
29.00
95
32.8
426.84
436.22
400
48.0
0.009
29.00
109
37.4
426.83
435.04
450
50.0
0.010
29.00
113
38.9
142.25
402.51
500
54.0
0.011
29.00
122
42.0
284.53
390.71
550
58.0
0.012
29.00
131
45.06
284.53
381.06
600
60.0
0.013
29.01
135
46.59
142.24
361.16
650
62.0
0.014
29.01
140
48.12
142.23
344.32
700
62.0
0.015
29.01
140
48.12
-0.05
319.72
750
61.0
0.016
29.01
137
47.36
-71.19
293.66
800
60.0
0.017
29.01
135
46.59
-71.19
270.86
0.0
Strength
MPa
Properties
0.0
H/D ratio=
1.94
cor.factor =
1.008
2
2.44 T/m
=
341.48 MPa
=
411.51 MPa
50.0
40.0
29.00
Summary of
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0
0.005
0.01
STRAIN, %
0.015
0.02
TABLE 2
ATTERBERG LIMIT TEST

Sample Sheet
ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST
Project.
Location.
Test No.
Boring. No.
BH - 1
Tested by.
LAMPRAI
Check by.
PANYA
Depth. (m.)
1.50-1.95
Water Content Determination
Liquid Limit Wl
Date.
16/6/2552
Plasttic Limit Wp
Container Number
B-27
B-28
B-59
B-21
Number of Blows
19
24
32
40
A-67
A-22
A-3
Plasticity index Ip = Wl - Wp
Wt. Wet Soil+Container
gm.
40.950 38.860 35.530 30.950 21.560 21.540 19.580 Flow Index If = Slope of Flow Curve
Wt. Dry Soil+Container
gm.
35.540 32.260 29.990 26.830 18.890 18.980 16.820
Wt. Water
gm.
5.410
6.600
5.540
4.120
2.670
2.560
2.760 Toughness Index It = Ip / If
Wt. Container
gm.
24.310 18.360 18.080 17.820
9.350
9.590
6.560
Wt. Dry Siol
gm.
11.230 13.900 11.910
9.010
9.540
9.390
10.260
Water Content
%.
48.17
45.73
27.99
27.26
26.90
Average (%)
47.48
46.52
47.34
Plasticity Index (lp) =
27.38
(WL)-(Wp) =
Activity of Clay A = Ip / (% by wt.<2u)
19.95
(%)
Water Content (%)

(Liquid Limit WL)
49.00
48.00
47.34
47.00
46.00
45.00
10
Number of Blows.
100
Project.
Location.
Test No.
Boring. No.
BH - 1
Tested by.
LAMPRAI
Check by.
PANYA
Depth. (m.)
3.00-8.00
Liquid Limit Wl
Date.
16/6/2552
Plasttic Limit Wp
Container Number
B-61
B-55
B-34
B-73
Number of Blows
18
24
32
40
A-69
A-19
A-24 Plasticity index Ip = Wl - Wp
gm.
gm.
39.210 35.750 30.190 27.990 18.880 19.520 19.110
Wt. Water
gm.
6.820
5.150
5.260
4.350
2.100
2.360
Wt. Container
gm.
24.210 24.170 18.050 17.710
9.570
9.500
9.450
Wt. Dry Siol
gm.
15.000 11.580 12.140 10.280
9.310
10.020
9.660
Water Content
%.
45.47
22.56
23.55
23.71
Average (%)
44.47
43.33
42.32
44.27
23.27
(WL)-(Wp) =
21.00
(%)
Water Content (%)

(Liquid Limit WL)
46.00
45.00
44.27
44.00
43.00
42.00
10
Number of Blows.
100
Project.
Location.
Test No.
Boring. No.
BH - 1
Tested by.
LAMPRAI
Check by.
PANYA
Depth. (m.)
8.00-12.45
Liquid Limit Wl
Date.
16/6/2552
Plasttic Limit Wp
Container Number
B-44
B-24
B-17
B-19
Number of Blows
18
24
33
40
A-36
A-46
gm.
gm.
38.250 35.520 29.950 28.380 19.450 16.070 16.160
Wt. Water
gm.
6.500
5.190
5.370
4.660
2.040
2.100
Wt. Container
gm.
24.480 24.300 18.030 17.860
9.330
6.500
6.490
Wt. Dry Siol
gm.
13.770 11.220 11.920 10.520 10.120
9.570
9.670
Water Content
%.
47.20
21.94
21.92
Average (%)
46.26
45.05
44.30
20.16
46.08
21.34
(WL)-(Wp) =
24.74
(%)
Water Content (%)

(Liquid Limit WL)
48.00
47.00
46.08
46.00
45.00
44.00
10
Number of Blows.
100
Project.
Location.
Test No.
Boring. No.
BH - 1
Tested by.
LAMPRAI
Check by.
PANYA
Depth. (m.)
12.45-15.45
Liquid Limit Wl
Date.
16/6/2552
Plasttic Limit Wp
Container Number
B-38
B-42
B-26
B-80
Number of Blows
18
24
33
40
A-54
A-4
gm.
gm.
36.740 33.570 30.290 28.590 16.550 16.400 18.350
Wt. Water
gm.
7.140
5.490
6.260
5.790
2.770
2.780
6.510
6.540
9.430
Wt. Container
gm.
24.160 23.680 18.730 17.670
Wt. Dry Siol
gm.
12.580
9.890
11.560 10.920 10.040
9.860
8.920
Water Content
%.
56.76
55.51
54.15
28.19
28.81
Average (%)
53.02
27.59
55.34
28.20
(WL)-(Wp) =
27.14
(%)
Water Content (%)

(Liquid Limit WL)
57.00
56.00
55.34
55.00
54.00
53.00
10
Number of Blows.
100
Project.
Location.
Test No.
Boring. No.
BH - 1
Tested by.
LAMPRAI
Check by.
PANYA
Depth. (m.)
15.45-21.45
Liquid Limit Wl
Date.
16/6/2552
Plasttic Limit Wp
Container Number
B-52
B-48
B-43
B-25
Number of Blows
18
24
33
40
A-9
A-47
gm.
gm.
34.430 29.690 28.470 28.240 16.590 16.280 17.450
Wt. Water
gm.
5.740
6.360
5.630
5.450
2.040
2.130
Wt. Container
gm.
24.110 18.080 17.990 17.940
6.480
6.430
6.450
Wt. Dry Siol
gm.
10.320 11.610 10.480 10.300 10.110
9.850
11.000
Water Content
%.
55.62
21.62
20.18
Average (%)
54.78
53.72
52.91
20.18
54.61
20.66
(WL)-(Wp) =
33.95
(%)
Water Content (%)

(Liquid Limit WL)
56.00
55.00
54.61
54.00
53.00
52.00
10
Number of Blows.
100
TABLE 3
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Sample Sheet

Project :
Sample :
BH-1
Tested by: Lamprai
Location :
Bangkla Chachoengsao
Date of Test:
Depth,m :
1.50-1.95
Before Washing(Sieve No.200)
11-6-52
Water Content,% :
After Washed and Oven Dry
Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
179.98 Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm

64.31 Wt.Container,gm
115.67 Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
115.67 Washing Loss,gm
Sieve
Size
1 in.
3/4 in.
1/2 in.
3/8 in.
# 4
# 10
# 20
# 40
#100
#200
Sieve Wt.Soil Adj.Wt.

Oprning Retain Soil Ret.
mm.
gm
gm
25.40
19.05
12.70
9.53
4.75
2.00
0.85
0.17
0.17
0.42
0.75
0.74
0.15
2.30
2.27
0.075
1.10
1.08
Pan
0.02
Total
Wt.Soil
Retain
%
0.02
4.34
4.28
0.14
0.64
1.96
0.94
0.14
0.78
2.74
3.68
96.32
100.00
Weighted Error,%
BH-1
Tested by: Lamprai
Location :
Date of Test:
Depth,m :
8.00-12.45
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Sieve
Size
Sieve Wt.Soil
Adj.Wt.
Opening Retain Soil Ret.
mm.
gm
gm
1 in.
25.40
3/4 in.
19.05
1/2 in.
12.70
3/8 in.
9.53
# 4
4.75
17.87
17.81
# 10
2.00
25.11
25.02
# 20
0.85
12.50
12.46
# 40
0.42
8.16
8.13
#100
0.15
16.03
15.97
#200
0.075
25.12
25.03
0.14
104.93
Tested by: Lamprai
Date of Test:
Depth,m :
3.00-8.00
Wt.Soil
Retain
%
0.14
104.57
Cumulative
Soil Ret.
%
4.68
6.58
3.28
2.14
4.20
6.58
4.68
11.26
14.54
16.68
20.88
27.46
72.54
100.00
Weighted Error,%
1" 3/4" 1/2"3/8"
4#
10#
11-6-52
Water Content,% :
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm

Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Sieve
Size
Sieve
Wt.Soil Adj.Wt.
mm.
gm
gm
25.40
19.05
12.70
9.53
4.75
0.31
0.31
2.00
2.55
2.56
0.85
2.97
2.98
0.42
2.93
2.94
0.15
21.52
21.57
0.075
7.97
7.99
1 in.
3/4 in.
1/2 in.
3/8 in.
# 4
# 10
# 20
# 40
#100
#200
-0.05
Pan
0.12
0.12
Total
38.37
38.46
Wt.Soil
Retain
%
0.16
1.32
1.53
1.51
11.11
4.11
0.16
1.48
3.01
4.52
15.63
19.74
80.26
100.00
Weighted Error,%
Sample :
BH-1
Tested by: Lamprai
Date of Test:
Depth,m :
12.45-15.45
275.69
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
95.32
88.74
85.46
83.32
79.12
72.54
-0.09
20#
40#
Sieve
Wt.Soil
Adj.Wt.
mm.
gm
gm
25.40
19.05
12.70
9.53
4.75
0.39
0.38
2.00
1.46
1.42
0.85
3.84
3.75
0.42
2.50
2.44
0.15
2.44
2.38
0.075
1.71
1.67
Pan
0.02
0.02
Total
12.36
12.06
100#
0.05

1 in.
3/4 in.
1/2 in.
3/8 in.
# 4
# 10
# 20
# 40
#100
#200
99.84
98.52
96.99
95.48
84.37
80.26
11-6-52
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Sieve
Size
Percent
Finer
%
Water Content,% :
170.02
65.45
104.57
Percent
Finer
%
96.57
58.11
38.46
155.76
Cumulative
Soil Ret.
%
Location :

Pan
BH-1
Location :
99.86
99.22
97.26
96.32
Water Content,% :
Sample :
Percent
Finer
%
11-6-52
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Total
68.59
64.31
4.28
111.39
Cumulative
Soil Ret.
%
Sample :
100
SIEVE ANALYSIS (ASTM D-422)
Wt.Soil
Retain
%
Cumulative
Soil Ret.
%
0.15
0.58
1.53
0.99
0.97
0.68
0.15
0.73
2.26
3.25
4.22
4.90
95.10
100.00
Weighted Error,%
79.44
67.37
12.07
233.62
Percent
Finer
%
99.85
99.27
97.74
96.75
95.78
95.10
-0.12
200#
90
% Passing by Weight
80
70
60
Sample No.1
50
Sample No.2
40
30
Sample No.3
20
Sample No.4
10
0
100.00
10.00
1.00
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE
0.10
0.01
Diameter in Milimeter

Project :
Sample :
BH-1
Tested by: Lamprai
Location :
Date of Test:
Depth,m :
15.45-21.45
Tested by:
Location :
Date of Test:
Depth,m :
Water Content,% :
147.04
68.29
78.75
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
160.36
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Washing Loss,gm
Water Content,% :

Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Sieve Wt.Soil Adj.Wt.

Oprning Retain Soil Ret.
mm.
gm
gm
25.40
19.05
12.70
9.53
4.75
6.73
6.73
2.00
18.01
18.01
0.85
18.21
18.21
0.42
10.64
10.64
0.15
14.88
14.88
0.075
10.25
10.25
1 in.
3/4 in.
1/2 in.
3/8 in.
# 4
# 10
# 20
# 40
#100
#200
Sample :
11-6-52
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Sieve
Size
SIEVE ANALYSIS (ASTM D-422)
Pan
0.04
0.04
Total
78.76
78.75
Wt.Soil
Retain
%
Cumulative
Soil Ret.
%
2.81
7.53
7.61
4.45
6.22
4.29
2.81
10.35
17.96
22.41
28.63
32.92
67.08
100.00
Weighted Error,%
Percent
Finer
%
Sieve
Size
Sieve
Wt.Soil Adj.Wt.
mm.
gm
gm
25.40
19.05
12.70
9.53
4.75
2.00
0.85
0.42
0.15
0.075
1 in.
3/4 in.
1/2 in.
3/8 in.
# 4
# 10
# 20
# 40
#100
#200
97.19
89.65
82.04
77.59
71.37
67.08
Wt.Soil
Retain
%
Cumulative
Soil Ret.
%
Pan
0.00
Total
0.00
0.00
Weighted Error,%
Sample :
Tested by:
Sample :
Tested by:
Location :
Date of Test:
Location :
Date of Test:
Depth,m :
Water Content,% :
Depth,m :
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Washing Loss,gm
Sieve
Size
Sieve Wt.Soil
Adj.Wt.
mm.
gm
gm
1 in.
25.40
3/4 in.
19.05
1/2 in.
12.70
3/8 in.
9.53
# 4
4.75
# 10
2.00
# 20
0.85
# 40
0.42
#100
0.15
#200
0.075
Wt.Soil
Retain
%
Cumulative
Soil Ret.
%
Percent
Finer
%
Water Content,% :
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Washing Loss,gm
Percent
Finer
%
Sieve
Size
Sieve
Wt.Soil
Adj.Wt.
mm.
gm
gm
25.40
19.05
12.70
9.53
4.75
2.00
0.85
0.42
0.15
0.075
1 in.
3/4 in.
1/2 in.
3/8 in.
# 4
# 10
# 20
# 40
#100
#200
Pan
#DIV/0!
Wt.Soil
Retain
%
Cumulative
Soil Ret.
%
Percent
Finer
%
Pan
Total
0.00
100
0.00
Weighted Error,%
1" 3/4" 1/2"3/8"
4#
10#
#DIV/0!
20#
Total
40#
0.00
100#
0.00
Weighted Error,%
#DIV/0!
200#
90
% Passing by Weight
80
70
60
Sample No.1
50
Sample No.2
40
30
Sample No.3
20
Sample No.4
10
0
100.00
10.00
1.00
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE
0.10
0.01
Diameter in Milimeter
TABLE 4
UNIT WEIGHT TEST

Sample Sheet

Project : SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT
Job No.:
Location : BANGKLA CHACHOENGSAO
Tested by:
UNIT WEIGHT
Date: 16 / 06 / 52
SIRIPORN
Checked by:
Unit Weight
(gm/cm3)
Depth
Wt. of soil
Height.
Diameter
(m)
(gm)
(cm)
(cm)
Volume.
(cm3)
BH. - 1
1.50-1.95
3.00-3.50
6.00-6.50
7.50-8.00
9.00-9.45
10.50-10.95
12.00-12.45
13.50-13.95
15.00-15.45
18.00-18.45
151.56
455.43
453.36
663.01
149.60
169.23
164.78
157.23
157.18
160.85
7.76
11.83
12.06
11.81
7.57
7.68
7.57
7.34
7.45
7.57
3.67
5.65
5.41
6.08
3.56
3.76
3.76
3.77
3.77
3.77
82.10
296.64
277.26
342.93
75.36
85.29
84.07
81.95
83.17
84.51
1.85
1.54
1.64
1.93
1.99
1.98
1.96
1.92
1.89
1.90
BH. - 2
3.00-3.50 515.23
4.50-5.00 455.03
6.00-6.50 480.98
7.50-8.00 439.19
9.00-9.50 538.22
10.50-10.95 158.25
12.00-12.45 160.74
UNIT WEIGHT =
11.92
11.92
11.97
11.97
12.08
7.63
7.83
5.47
5.21
5.51
5.49
5.69
3.64
3.71
280.15
254.15
285.46
283.39
307.21
79.41
84.66
1.84
1.79
1.68
1.55
1.75
1.99
1.90
Boring No
Wt. of soil.
Volme.
TABLE 5
WATER CONTENT TEST

Sample Sheet

PROJECT : SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT
JOB No.
TESTED BY : LAMPRAI
Sample
No.
BH -1
WATER CONTENT
LOCATION : BANGKLA CHACHOENGSAO

DATE : 11/ 06 / 52
CHECKED BY : PANYA
Depth. Container Wt. Of Cont.

(m.)
No.
(gm.)
0.00-1.95
E-8
64.31
3.00-3.50
C-32
16.82
6.00-6.50
C-15
14.14
7.50-8.00
C-7
13.30
8.00-12.45
E-9
65.45
12.45-15.45 E-13
67.37
15.45-21.45 E-17
68.29
Wt. Of Cont.+ Wt. Of Cont.+ Wt. Of

Wt. Water
Wet Soil(gm.) Dry Soil(gm) Dry Soil(gm) (gm)
215.83
179.98
115.67
35.85
100.57
68.57
51.75
32.00
106.77
72.02
57.88
34.75
175.73
135.19
121.89
40.54
517.88
445.71
380.26
72.17
377.92
313.06
245.69
64.86
355.34
307.40
239.11
47.94
Water
Content %
30.99
61.84
60.04
33.26
18.98
26.40
20.05
BH -2
3.00-3.50
4.50-5.00
6.00-6.50
7.50-8.00
9.00-9.50
9.50-12.45
12.45-16.95
C-109
C-91
C-89
C-92
C-80
E-1
E-11
19.54
16.49
19.00
21.75
18.82
68.66
64.50
215.94
153.42
124.34
199.90
166.73
390.28
441.10
160.58
100.07
86.79
132.11
124.38
327.99
376.88
141.04
83.58
67.79
110.36
105.56
259.33
312.38
55.36
53.35
37.55
67.79
42.35
62.29
64.22
39.25
63.83
55.39
61.43
40.12
24.02
20.56
BH -3
3.00-3.50
4.50-5.00
6.00-6.50
7.50-8.00
8.00-10.95
10.95-18.45
C-18
C-61
C-68
C-105
E-7
E-19
13.73
19.17
18.52
20.38
70.35
70.48
254.37
323.13
317.72
268.74
379.00
675.65
156.88
217.20
208.84
193.34
326.87
556.63
143.15
198.03
190.32
172.96
256.52
486.15
97.49
105.93
108.88
75.40
52.13
119.02
68.10
53.49
57.21
43.59
20.32
24.48
WATER CONTENT
= Wt, of Weter 100

Wt.of Dry Soil
TABLE 6
Consolidation Test
Sample Sheet
CONSOLIDATION TEST (ASTM D 2435)
NONGSAENG SARABURI
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Applied
Scale
Pressure
Dial Reading Dial Change
Load
STIFF CLAY
Final
Cumulative
BORING NO.
: BH-2R
SAMPLE NO.
0.85
DEPTH (m)
: 01.50-02.00
TESTED BY
: RAWAT K.
DATE
: 29/09-02/10/2009
MADE BY
: M. SUKMOL
27.62
Initial Water Content, Wni

Final Water Content, Wnf
22.80
%
%
h, (cm)
Initial Void Ratio, e0
0.807
0.000
0.0000
Initial Total Unit Weight, ti
1.92
t/m
0.650
40
0.0102
Final Total Unit Weight, tf
2.05
t/m
5.00
1.300
100
0.0254
Specific Gravity, Gs
2.689
10.00
2.600
235
0.0597
Liquid Limit, LL
20.00
5.201
440
0.1118
40.00
10.401
688
0.1748
80.00
20.803
995
0.2527
160.00
41.606
1480
40.00
10.401
1360
10.00
2.600
2.50
0.650
(kg)
0.00
2.50
Plasticity Index, PI
Sample Height, H0
2.52
cm
Sample Area, A
21.401
cm
0.3759
Wt.of Dry Sample, Ws
80.25
gm
0.3454
Height of Solid, Hs
1.395
cm
1178
0.2992
Effective Overburden Pressure, 'vo
3.36
t/m
1072
0.2723
Preconsolidation Pressure, 'vm
33.00
t/m
Over Consolidation Ratio, OCR
9.821
Applied
Sample
Void
Pressure
Height
Height
(t/m2)
H, (cm)
Hv, (cm)
0.00
2.5200
1.1255
0.8071
2.50
2.5098
1.1153
5.00
2.4946
1.1001
10.00
2.4603
20.00
33.00
Cv (0.0001 cm/sec)
'vm
0.75
(0.0001")
(t/m )
0.50
Fitting Time
Height
t90
t50
0.848 x Ha
0.197 x Ha
Ha, (cm)
(sec)
(sec)
4 x t90
4 x t50
t90
t50
0.7998
2.5149
1109
420
12.086
7.417
1.949
1.196
0.7889
2.5022
1815
702
7.313
4.393
1.769
1.063
1.0658
0.7643
2.4775
1622
558
8.020
5.417
2.183
1.474
2.4082
1.0137
0.7269
2.4343
821
348
15.294
8.386
3.160
1.733
2.3452
0.9507
0.6818
2.3767
1325
414
9.036
6.720
1.737
1.292
80.00
2.2673
0.8728
0.6258
2.3063
2018
780
5.587
3.358
0.368
0.221
160.00
2.1441
0.7496
0.5375
2.2057
1270
426
8.124
5.624
0.496
0.344
40.00
2.1746
0.7800
0.5594
2.1593
10.00
2.2208
0.8263
0.5925
2.1977
2.50
2.2477
0.8532
0.6118
2.2343
Hs
= Ws / Gw .A
2)
Cv
= 0.848 Ha / 4t90
= 0.197 Ha / 4t50
3)
Coef. of Permea
k x 10-8 (cm/sec)
= (Cv.e.w) / (1+e0)
0.65
0.55
e = Hv/Hs
1)
0.70
0.60
Void Ratio Ave. Sample
Notes :
Cr = 0.058
Cc = 0.292
Cs = 0.041
0.80
Void Ratio, e
LOCATION
POWER GENERATION SUPPLY
Coef. of Consolidation, cv x 10-4

(cm2/sec)
100
t90
t50
t90
t50
10
1
10
Coef. of Permeability, k x 10-8 (cm/sec)
PROJECT
0.1
10
100
1000
Pressure (t/m2)
FM-GE-05-13
R00
30/05/2005
\\labtest\conso\Lab ConsoBH-2
CONSOLIDATION TEST (ASTM D 2435)
PROJECT
POWER GENERATION SUPPLY
BORING NO.
: BH-2R
SAMPLE NO.
LOCATION
NONGSAENG SARABURI
DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
WATER CONTENT
BEGIN
END
TESTED BY
: RAWAT K.
DATE
: 29/09-02/10/2009
: 01.50-02.00
CHECKED BY : SOMPOL I.
: STIFF CLAY
DATE
: 05/10/2009
MADE BY
: M. SUKMOL
UNIT WEIGHT
BEGIN
END
APPARATUS
R-5
R-32
A-29
Wt. OF SOIL + RING
(gm)
1111.98
COSOLIDOMETER NO.
R-2
Wt. OF CONTAINER
(gm)
10.57
10.48
24.80
Wt. OF RING
(gm)
1008.50
LEVER ARM RATIO
8.23
Wt. OF WET SOIL + CONTAINER
(gm)
45.32
54.05
123.35
Wt. OF SOIL
(gm)
103.48
98.55
RING NO.
R-2
53.93
48.10
DIAMETER, D
(cm)
21.401
2.52
CONTAINER NO.
Wt. OF DRY SOIL + CONTAINER
(gm)
37.75
44.68
105.05
VOLUME OF SOIL
(cm )
(t/m )
1.919
2.049
SAMPLE AREA, A
(cm )
(%)
27.62
22.80
SAMPLE HEIGHT, H0
(cm)
Wt OF WATER
(gm)
7.57
9.37
18.30
TOTAL UNIT Wt., t
Wt. OF DRY SOIL, Ws
(gm)
27.18
34.20
80.25
AVE. WATER CONTENT
WATER CONTENT, Wn
(%)
27.85
LIQUID LIMIT, LL
PLASTICITY INDEX, PI
27.40
22.80
DRY UNIT Wt., d
(t/m )
SPECIFIC GRAVITY, Gs
1.503
1.668
(cm )
VOLUME, V
2.689
SOLID HEIGHT, Hs
5.22
53.930
= Ws / (Gs . W . A)
=
1.395
cm.
APPLIED
SCALE
FINAL DIAL
CUM. DIAL
SAMPLE HEIGHT
VOID HEIGHT
VOID RATIO
AVERAGE
FITTING TIME
COEF. OF CONSLIDATION
PRESSURE
LOAD
READING
CHANGE
H = H0-h
Hv = H-Hs
e = Hv/ Hs
SAMPLE HEIGHT
(min)
CV, (0.0001 cm2/sec)
(t/m2)
(kg)
(0.0001 in)
h, (cm)
(cm)
(cm)
0.00
0.000
0.0000
2.5200
1.1255
0.8071
2.50
0.650
40
0.0102
2.5098
1.1153
0.7998
2.5149
18.49
5.00
1.300
100
0.0254
2.4946
1.1001
0.7889
2.5022
10.00
2.600
235
0.0597
2.4603
1.0658
0.7643
20.00
5.201
440
0.1118
2.4082
1.0137
0.7269
40.00
10.401
688
0.1748
2.3452
0.9507
80.00
20.803
995
0.2527
2.2673
160.00
41.606
1480
0.3759
40.00
10.401
1360
0.3454
10.00
2.600
1178
2.50
0.650
1072
0.848 x Ha2
0.197 x Ha2
4 x t90
4 x t50
7.00
12.086
7.417
30.25
11.70
7.313
4.393
2.4775
27.04
9.30
8.020
5.417
2.4343
13.69
5.80
15.294
8.386
0.6818
2.3767
22.09
6.90
9.036
6.720
0.8728
0.6258
2.3063
33.64
13.00
5.587
3.358
2.1441
0.7496
0.5375
2.2057
21.16
7.10
8.124
5.624
2.1746
0.7800
0.5594
2.1593
0.2992
2.2208
0.8263
0.5925
2.1977
0.2723
2.2477
0.8532
0.6118
2.2343
Hav, (cm)
t90
t50
datamain\labtest\conso\Lab ConsoBH-2
TABLE 7
Field permeability test

Sample Sheet
Field Permeability Test

(Constant Head)
PROJECT: SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT
DATE :09 June 2009
Location : Bangkla Chacherngsao
Hole Diameter : 10 cm.

Hole
Depth Casing
No.
of Test Depth
Sample Shee (m.)
(m.)
BH-1
BH-2
BH-3
BH-4
BH-5
BH-6
BH-7
BH-8
BH-17
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Height of Casing Above Ground :

Length G.W.L Elapsed Water
of Test
Time
Flow
(m.)
(m.)
(sec)
(cc)
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
1.10
1.10
1.10
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
1.50
1.50
1.50
0.96
0.96
0.96
2.00
2.00
2.00
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
Average
110
70
60
190
110
90
160
100
80
180
90
80
120
80
50
110
70
70
285
190
110
130
80
70
200
110
80
0.50 m.
Permebility
Coefficient
(cm/sec.)
2.31 E - 06
1.47 E - 06
1.26 E - 06
2.56 E - 06
1.48 E - 06
1.21 E - 06
2.69 E - 06
1.68 E - 06
1.34 E - 06
3.03 E - 06
1.51 E - 06
1.35 E - 06
2.77 E - 06
1.84 E - 06
1.15 E - 06
2.54 E - 06
1.61 E - 06
1.61 E - 06
4.80 E - 06
3.20 E - 06
1.85 E - 06
3.00 E - 06
1.84 E - 06
1.61 E - 06
4.04 E - 06
1.48 E - 06
1.08 E - 06
2.09 E- 06
Table 8
Soil Resistivity Test Data
Sample sheet
SOIL RESISTIVITY TEST
TEST NO: R-1
Project: Saraburi B Cogeneration Company Limited

Location: Nong kae Industrial Estate Saraburi Province
Ground Condition: FLAT
Position: N
E
Ground Ele.:
Date: 11/2/53
Test by: Phisit
Machine: Megger DET4TD2

S/N No.1038
Distance (m)
0.50
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Measured Resistance ()

E-W
N-S
60.00
38.20
14.00
9.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
0.45
4.00
0.34
3.00
0.30
Average Resistivity
Ground Resistivity (-m)

E-W
N-S
Average
188.496
120.009
154.252
87.965
56.549
72.257
62.832
62.832
62.832
75.398
8.482
41.940
100.531
8.545
54.538
94.248
9.425
51.836
101.578
44.307
72.943
Distance (m)
1
2
E-W
N-S
4
5
Average
6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Ground Resistivity (-m)
Note:
The apparent soil resistivity is then given by

=2aR (-m)
where:-
= ground resistivity in -m

= 3.1415927
a = electrode spacing in metres
R = measured resistance in at spacing 'a'
R-1
Inspector: Satit
Project Engineer: Suchat

Project Manager: Weraphol
Project Owner: i-ASTM
Table 9
Down Hole Seismic Test Data
Sample sheet
Summary of Seismic waves travel time and velocityof the site

Saraburi B CoGeneration
Ts
Depth
(m)
1.0
Tp
Shear wave(Vs)
(Milli Sec.) (Milli Sec.) Velocity(m/s)*1000
Comp. wave(Vp)
Velocity(m/s)*1000
1.82
0.31
0.55
5.41
2.99
0.37
0.67
3.0
7.89
3.95
0.38
0.76
4.0
9.52
4.60
0.42
0.87
0.89
2.0
3.23
5.0
11.36
5.62
0.44
6.0
10.34
5.56
0.58
1.08
7.0
12.07
5.69
0.58
1.23
1.49
8.0
10.81
5.37
0.74
9.0
11.69
5.81
0.77
1.55
10.0
11.90
6.29
0.84
1.59
1.45
11.0
13.92
7.59
0.79
12.0
13.48
6.82
0.89
1.76
1.65
13.0
15.48
7.88
0.84
14.0
15.91
7.91
0.88
1.77
15.0
14.29
7.50
1.05
2.00
1.74
16.0
18.60
9.20
0.86
17.0
17.71
8.42
0.96
2.02
18.0
18.75
9.23
0.96
1.95
2.07
1.89
19.0
17.76
9.18
1.07
19.4
20.00
10.26
0.97
Velocity(m./sec.)
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Depth(m.)
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Saraburi B CoGeneration
Down Hole Seismic Results - BH-3
Compression Wave
Shear Wave
Dynamic Elastic Moduli (BH-03) : SBC

Depth (m)
G = Shear modulus, MPa
v = Poisson's ratio
E = Young modulus, MPa K = Bulk modulus, MPa
G = UVs g
v = (0.5-VR^2)/(1-VR^2)
E = 2G.(1+v)
K = UVp2g
1.0
190
0.27
480.85
59.72
2.0
270
0.28
692.25
88.63
3.0
303
0.33
808.26
121.24
4.0
367
0.35
988.39
157.30
5.0
402
0.34
1076.88
164.62
6.0
626
0.30
1623.52
216.95
7.0
668
0.36
1812.06
300.27
8.0
1161
0.34
3102.32
470.61
9.0
1257
0.34
3358.68
509.28
10.0
1422
0.31
3716.51
509.63
11.0
1252
0.29
3226.50
421.65
12.0
1589
0.33
4219.86
621.22
13.0
1408
0.33
3730.73
543.16
14.0
1569
0.34
4192.20
634.81
15.0
2406
0.31
6302.00
872.85
16.0
1614
0.34
4320.02
660.66
17.0
2011
0.35
5446.42
890.40
18.0
2011
0.34
5389.83
829.76
19.0
2451
0.32
6458.94
935.02
19.4
2053
0.32
5425.31
779.48
Table 10
Dutch Cone penetration Test Data
Sample sheet
DUTCH CONE
TEST NO. DC-1 (SBC)
Project : Saraburi B Cogeneration Company Limited

Place & location : Nong Kae Industrial Estate
Ground condition : Flat Area
Equipment max. load 5.0 tons :
Coordinate N E ...
Ground ele.,m. .
Total depth,m. 15.00
(G)Gauge no. Pressure correction,ksc.
3.70
Sleeve diam. cm., :
3.70
A :(0-16 ksc.)
1.03*(Reading,div. - 0.65)
Cone project area,cm2 10.75
Sleeve height ,cm.:
13.50
B :(0-80 ksc.)
0.88*(Reading,div.) +1.75
Cone weight ,kg.
Sleeve area,cm2. :
156.92
C :(0-250 ksc.)
0.96*(Reading,div. -2.0)
11.28
D :(0-400 ksc.)
1.04*(Reading,div.)
Cone Diameter
:
:
Rod weight , kg./rod
1.60
1.57
Piston area,cm2
Rod (G) Depth Reading,div.

Qc
no.
m.
a
b
t/m2
1 B
0.0
10
18
112.2
1 B
0.2
10
18
112.2
1 B
0.4
12
22
130.6
1 B
0.6
12
22
130.6
2 B
0.8
12
20
132.1
2 B
1.0
10
22
113.6
2 B
1.2
10
20
113.6
2 B
1.4
10
20
113.6
2 B
1.6
6
20
76.7
3 B
1.8
14
30
152.0
3 B
2.0
12
26
133.6
3 B
2.2
14
32
152.0
3 B
2.4
10
24
115.1
3 B
2.6
10
28
115.1
4 B
2.8
10
22
116.5
4 B
3.0
10
20
116.5
4 B
3.2
16
30
171.9
4 B
3.4
22
44
227.3
4 B
3.6
30
50
301.2
5 B
3.8
32
56
321.1
5 B
4.0
34
64
339.6
5 B
4.2
32
64
321.1
5 B
4.4
32
66
321.1
5 B
4.6
32
58
321.1
6 B
4.8
38
60
378.0
6 B
5.0
32
62
322.6
6 B
5.2
36
58
359.5
6 B
5.4
36
60
359.5
6 B
5.6
34
56
341.1
7 B
5.8
36
58
361.0
7 B
6.0
36
60
361.0
7 B
6.2
42
76
416.4
7 C
6.4
60
70
594.5
7 C
6.6
55
90
544.1
8 C
6.8
60
85
595.9
8 C
7.0
60
85
595.9
8 C
7.2
65
105
646.3
8 C
7.4
70
100
696.7
8 C
7.6
60
85
595.9
9 C
7.8
60
90
597.4
9 C
8.0
70
110
698.1
9 C
8.2
65
90
647.8
9 C
8.4
75
105
748.5
9 C
8.6
75
105
748.5
10 C
8.8
65
95
649.2
10 C
9.0
75
100
750.0
10 C
9.2
60
90
598.9
10 C
9.4
65
90
649.2
10 C
9.6
60
85
598.9
11 C
9.8
65
90
650.7
11 C 10.0
65
90
650.7
Test date 17/2/2010
Test by: Pisit
Qs
Qs/Qc
Qf
Qb
Rod (G) Depth Reading,div.
Qc
Qs
Qs/Qc
Qf
t/m2
%
t/m
t/m2
no.
m.
a
b
t/m2
t/m2
%
t/m
5.1
4.5
0.9
37.4
11 C 10.0
65
90
650.7
17.3
2.7 133.5
5.1
4.5
1.8
37.4
11 C
10.2
55
100
550.0
31.1
5.6 139.1
6.3
4.8
3.0
43.5
11 C
10.4
55
110
550.0
38.0
6.9 145.9
6.3
4.8
4.1
43.5
11 C
10.6
60
120
600.3
41.4
6.9 153.3
5.1
3.8
5.0
44.0
12 C
10.8
75
125
752.9
34.5
4.6 159.6
7.6
6.7
6.4
37.9
12 C 11.0
80
115
803.2
24.2
3.0 163.9
6.3
5.6
7.5
37.9
12 C
11.2
75
115
752.9
27.6
3.7 168.9
6.3
5.6
8.7
37.9
12 C
11.4
75
115
752.9
27.6
3.7 173.8
8.9
11.5
10.2
25.6
12 C 11.6
70
120
702.5
34.5
4.9 180.0
10.1
6.7
12.1
50.7
13 C
11.8
70
120
704.0
34.5
4.9 186.3
8.9
6.6
13.7
44.5
13 C 12.0
70
115
704.0
31.1
4.4 191.9
11.4
7.5
15.7
50.7
13 C
12.2
85
105
855.1
13.8
1.6 194.3
8.9
7.7
17.3
38.4
13 C
12.4
70
100
704.0
20.7
2.9 198.1
11.4
9.9
19.4
38.4
13 C
12.6
70
100
704.0
20.7
2.9 201.8
7.6
6.5
20.7
38.8
14 C
12.8
60
95
604.7
24.2
4.0 206.1
6.3
5.4
21.9
38.8
14 C 13.0
60
100
604.7
27.6
4.6 211.1
8.9
5.2
23.5
57.3
14 C
13.2
60
105
604.7
31.1
5.1 216.7
13.9
6.1
26.0
75.8
14 C
13.4
60
110
604.7
34.5
5.7 222.9
12.7
4.2
28.2 100.4
14 C
13.6
75
100
755.8
17.3
2.3 226.0
15.2
4.7
31.0 107.0
15 C
13.8
70
105
706.9
24.2
3.4 230.4
19.0
5.6
34.4 113.2
15 C 14.0
75
105
757.3
20.7
2.7 234.1
20.2
6.3
38.0 107.0
15 C
14.2
70
100
706.9
20.7
2.9 237.8
21.5
6.7
41.9 107.0
15 C
14.4
75
95
757.3
13.8
1.8 240.3
16.4
5.1
44.9 107.0
15 C
14.6
65
100
656.5
24.2
3.7 244.6
13.9
3.7
47.4 126.0
16 C
14.8
70
105
708.4
24.2
3.4 249.0
19.0
5.9
50.8 107.5
16 C 15.0
70
110
708.4
27.6
3.9 254.0
13.9
3.9
53.3 119.8
15.2
4.2
56.0 119.8
------------------------------------13.9
4.1
58.5 113.7
Ended of testing at 15.00 meters depth.
13.9
3.9
61.0 120.3
15.2
4.2
63.8 120.3
21.5
5.2
67.6 138.8
6.9
1.2
68.9 198.2
24.2
4.4
73.2 181.4
17.3
2.9
76.3 198.6
17.3
2.9
79.4 198.6
27.6
4.3
84.4 215.4
20.7
3.0
88.1 232.2
17.3
2.9
91.2 198.6
20.7
3.5
95.0 199.1
27.6
4.0
99.9 232.7
17.3
2.7 103.0 215.9
20.7
2.8 106.8 249.5
20.7
2.8 110.5 249.5
20.7
3.2 114.2 216.4
17.3
2.3 117.3 250.0
20.7
3.5 121.0 199.6
17.3
2.7 124.2 216.4
17.3
2.9 127.3 199.6
17.3
2.7 130.4 216.9
17.3
2.7 133.5 216.9
Calculated by : Nontasate
Checked by :
W.Pramot
Qb=*Qc ;
where Qb = Ultimate pile tip bearing capacity,(t/m2)
Qf = L*f*Qs ; where :
Qf = Ultimate pile shaft friction,(t/m)
L = Embedded pile length,(m)
f = Adhesion factor,use 0.9 for all cases
Qs = Local cone shaft friction,(t/m2)
= (b-a)*(gauge correction)/(Sleeve area)
Qb
t/m2
216.9
183.3
183.3
200.1
251.0
267.7
251.0
251.0
234.2
234.7
234.7
285.0
234.7
234.7
201.6
201.6
201.6
201.6
251.9
235.6
252.4
235.6
252.4
218.8
236.1
236.1
= Cone resistance factor, use 1/3

Qc = Local cone resistance,(t/m2)
=((a*(gauge correction))+(no.rod)*(rod weight))/(cone project area)
a= Cone resistance reading,(div.)
b= a+ Friction reading,(div.)
Sheet1..of1..

PROJECT
LOCATION
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST
Saraburi B Cogeneration Company Limited
Nong Kae Industrial Estate
TEST NO.
DC-1
TESTED BY
Phisit
DEPTH (m)
15.00
DATE
17/02/2010
N :
COMPUTED BY :
Nontasate
E :
DATE
03/03/2010
COORD.
Saraburi Province
:
Flat Area
ELEV. (m)
10
DEPTH (m)
DEPTH (m)
DEPTH (m)
STA.
10
10
11
11
11
12
12
12
13
13
13
14
14
14
15
15
15
16
16
16
17
17
17
18
18
18
19
19
19
20
20
20
0
CONE RESISTANCE
2
Qc ( x1000 t/m )
20
40
60
LOCAL FRICTION
2
Qs (t/m )
80
100
10
15
FRICTION RATIO
Qs/Qc (%)
20
Table 11
Compaction and CBR Test Data
Sample sheet
COMPACTION TEST(ASTM D1140 - 54)

TESTED BY
GROUP LAB
DATE
15-05-53
CHECK BY
SOMCHAI
DATE
17-05-53
TEST PIT NO :
PROJECT
MEGA BANGNA SHOPPING CENTER
DEPTH (m)
BANGKOK - THAILAND
LOCATION
SOURCE
MATERIAL
: EMBANKMENT (CRUSHED ROCK)
TYPE OF TEST
STANDARD PROCTOR
WEIGHT OF HAMMER (lb.)
5.5
MOLD DIAMETER (cm)
10.100
DROP HEIGHT (in.)
12
MOLD HEIGHT (cm)
12.105
NUMBER OF LAYER
970.224
NUMBER OF BLOWS/LAYER
25
MOLD VOLUME (cm
A. WET & DRY DENSITY

1
TEST NO.
WT. OF MOLD + COMPACTED SOIL
(gm)
3767
3905
3926
3868
WT. OF MOLD
(gm)
1661
1661
1661
1661
MOLD NO.
WT. OF COMPACTED SOIL
(gm)
2106
2244
2265
2207
WET DENSITY, WD
(t/m)
2.171
2.313
2.335
2.275
DRY DENSITY, DD = WD/(1+w/100)
(t/m)
2.035
2.131
2.115
2.035
A-29
A-30
A-26
A-37
B. WATER CONTENT
CONTAINER NO.
WT. OF CONTAINER
(gm)
32.40
43.70
26.50
32.00
WT. OF CONTAINER + WET SOIL
(gm)
238.10
188.60
209.30
226.80
WT. OF CONTAINER + DRY SOIL
(gm)
225.20
177.20
192.10
206.30
WT. OF WATER, W w
(gm)
12.90
11.40
17.20
20.50
WT. OF DRY SOIL, W d
(gm)
192.80
133.50
165.60
174.30
WATER CONTENT, w = (W w/Wd)x100
(%)
6.69
8.54
10.39
11.76
C. RESULTS
MAX. DRY DENSITY, MDD (t/m)
2.137
OPT. MOISTURE CONTENT, OMC (%)
9.40
2.2
2.1
Dry Density (t/m)
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
5
10
11
12
13
14
15
Water Content (%)
TP-1
DATAMAIN\LABTEST\COMPACTION\Compaction-Silaporn-15-05-2010.xls
ASTM D 1883 / AASHTO T 193 / .-. 109 (DH-T 109)
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) TEST

PROJECT
LOCATION
TESTED BY
GROUP LAB
DEPTH (m) :
CRUSHED ROCK
DATE
19/05/2553
SOURCE
INPUT BY
DATE
CRUSHED ROCK
CHECKED BY
DATE
SAMPLE
BANGKOK-THAILAND

.
TEST CONDITION :
MATERIAL
SOAKED
20/05/2553
21/05/2553
TEST NO. 1
TEST NO. 2
TEST NO. 3
T-99
T-99
T-99
NO. OF LAYER
NO. OF BLOWS / LAYER
12
25
56
1. COMPACTION DATA (BEFORE SOAKING)

COMPACTION TYPE(MODIFIED OR STANDARD)
DIAMETER OF MOLD,
(cm)
15.21
15.13
15.16
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE,
(cm)
17.82
17.81
17.80
WT. OF SAMPLE,
W1
(kg)
4.429
4.849
5.210
VOLUME OF SAMPLE,
(m)
0.0022
0.0022
0.0022
WET DENSITY,
t =
(t/m)
2.013
2.204
2.368
Optimum Water Content(From Compaction test)
(%)
9.40
9.40
9.40
DRY DENSITY,
(t/m)
1.840
2.015
2.165
d =
W1 / V
t / (1+ w/100)
2. WATER ABSORPTION (AFTER SOAKING)

WATER CONTENT
(%)
9.82
9.51
9.45
WT. OF SAMPLE,
W2
(kg)
4.540
4.915
5.240
% ABSORPTION,
{(W 2-W 1) / W 1} * 100
(%)
2.51
1.36
0.58
3. SWELLING MEASUREMENT
DATE
TIME
ELAPSED TIME
GAGE RDG.
(hrs)
(div)
% SWELL
GAGE RDG.
% SWELL
GAGE RDG.
(div)
% SWELL
(div)
15/05/2553
09.40
0.000
0.000
0.000
16/05/2553
09.40
24
0.009
0.004
0.001
18/05/2553
09.40
24
0.010
0.004
0.001
19/05/2553
09.40
24
0.010
0.004
0.001
20/05/2553
09.40
24
0.010
0.004
0.001
LOAD, R
PRESSURE
56Blows(div)
(psi)
GAGE ACCURACY (in./div)
SURCHARGE (lbs)
0.001
10
4. PENETRATION TEST
PENETRATION
LOAD, R
PRESSURE
LOAD, R
(in)
12Blows(div)
(psi)
25Blows(div)
0.000
0.025
120
17.52
390
109.04
450
129.38
0.050
150
27.69
490
142.94
570
170.06
0.075
230
54.81
610
183.62
810
251.41
0.100
310
81.92
680
207.35
1090
346.33
0.200
380
105.65
730
224.30
1570
509.04
0.300
450
129.38
1000
315.82
1990
651.41
0.400
590
176.84
1190
380.23
2300
756.50
0.500
770
237.86
1400
451.41
2900
959.88
PROVING RING NO.
PR-5
LOAD
1.0305R - 70.404
(lbs)
PRESSURE
(psi)
(R = Guage Reading in division, 0.0001 in/div)
PISTON DIA.
(in)
1.967
PISTON AREA
(sq.in)
3.040
DATAMAIN\LABTEST\LAB CBR\CBR-Silaporn-19-02-2010.xls

PROJECT
LOCATION
TESTED BY
GROUP LAB
DEPTH (m) :
CRUSHED ROCK
DATE
19/05/2553
SOURCE
INPUT BY
DATE
CRUSHED ROCK
CHECKED BY
CRUSHED ROCK
DATE
SAMPLE
TEST CONDITION :
MATERIAL
SOAKED
20/05/2553
21/05/2553
% CBR
1
SOAKED
SOAKED
SOAKED
TEST NO.
TEST CONDITION
PENETRATION
(in)
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
PISTON PRESSURE, A
(psi)
81.92
105.65
207.35
224.30
346.33
509.04
STANDARD UNIT LOAD,B
(psi)
1,000
1,500
1,000
1,500
1,000
1,500
8.19
7.04
20.73
14.95
34.63
33.94
% CBR = ( A/B )x100

1000
12 BLOWS/LAYER
900
25 BLOWS/LAYER
56 BLOWS/LAYER
800
PISTON PRESSURE (psi)
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
PENETRATION (in)

PROJECT

SAMPLE
DEPTH (m) :
LOCATION
TEST CONDITION :
SOURCE
t/m3
2.030
CRUSHED ROCK
DATE
19/05/2553
INPUT BY
DATE
CHECKED BY
DATE
CRUSHED ROCK
20/05/2553
21/05/2553
1.840
2.015
2.165
8.19
20.73
34.63
T-99
AT 95% MDD, DRY DENSITY
GROUP LAB
% CBR (SOAKED)
COMPACTION METHOD
TEST NO
DRY DENSITY
TESTED BY
MATERIAL
SOAKED
MAX. DRY DENSITY (MDD)
2.137
t/m3
CBR
22.30
t/m3
2.50
2.45
2.40
2.35
2.30
2.25
2.20
2.15
DRY DENSITY (t/m)
2.10
2.05
2.00
1.95
1.90
1.85
1.80
1.75
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.50
1.45
1.40
5.0
15.0
25.0
35.0
45.0
CBR (%)
Table 12
Water Analysis Test Data
Sample sheet
GROUND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS REPORT

Coordination
Sampling Source
Monitoring Date
Monitored by
Report Date
Ref. No.
: INFRATECH ASIM CO., LTD.

: Saraburi B Cogeneration Co., Ltd. (Saraburi)
: February 25, 2010
: Health & Envitech Co., Ltd.
: March 6, 2010
: H.E. 371/2010
STANDARD METHOD OF GROUND WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

PARAMETER
pH
Calcium (Ca)
Magnesium (Mg)
Manganese (Mn)
Chloride (Cl)
Total Hardness (as CaCO3)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Sodium (Na)
Nitrate (NO3)
Sulfate (SO4)
Carbon dioxide (CO2) as Carbonate (CO3)
Phosphate (PO4)
Silica (Si)
...
(Prasart Chiaplaem)
Laboratory No. -152--3213
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHOD

Grab Sampling, pH Meter
Grab Sampling, Direct Aspiration, Atomic Absorption
Grab Sampling, Ion-Selective Electrode
Grab Sampling, EDTA Titrimetric
Grab Sampling, Nitrate Electrode Method
Grab Sampling, Iodometric
Grab Sampling, EDTA Titrimetric
Grab Sampling, Vanadomolybdophosphoric acid, Colorimetric
Grab Sampling, Molybdosilicate Method, Direct Aspiration, Atomic
Absorption
...
(Rung Rittiyan)
GROUND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS RESULTS

STARDARD
SOURCE
PARAMETER
UNIT
DETECTED
VALUE
Suitable
allowance
7.0 8.5
-
Max.
allowable
6.5 9.2
-
Saraburi B Cogeneation Co., Ltd. pH

6.7
Calcium (Ca)
mg/l
0.186
Magnesium (Mg)
mg/l
2.400
Manganese (Mn)
mg/l
*2.234
d 0.3
d 0.5
Chloride (Cl)
mg/l
42
d 250
d 600
Total Hardness (as CaCO3)
mg/l
152
d 300
d 500
Iron (Fe)
mg/l
*2.421
d 0.5
d 1.0
Potassium (K)
mg/l
0.038
Sodium (Na)
mg/l
1.502
Nitrate (NO3)
mg/l
0.280
d 45
d 45
Sulfate (SO4)
mg/l
4.276
d 200
d 250
Carbon dioxide (CO2) as
mg/l
253
Carbonate (CO3)
Phosphate (PO4)
mg/l
4.276
Silica (Si)
mg/l
35.783
*Over standard limit
Remark
1. Standard: Notification of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment B.E. 2551 (2008), issued under The
Ground Water Act B.E. 2520 (1977), published in the Royal Government Gazette, Vol. 125, Special Part 85 . dated May 21, B.E.
2551 (2008).
2. Test results will be applicable only for the brought samples.
3. Do not copy partial of this analysis report without official approval.
4. Definition
mg/l
: milligrams per liter
...
(Prasart Chiaplaem)
Registered Lab. Controller
...
(Rung Rittiyan)
Managing Director
Health & Envitech Co., Ltd.
Registered Lab No. -152

Method Soil Investigation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Method Soil Investigation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Method Statement

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND OF THE PROJECT ....................................................... 3

SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................... 3

3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND BOUNDARY SURVEY ..3

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

Sample of Soil Boring Log data sheet

Sample of Unconfined Compression Test data sheet

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND OF THE PROJECT

Laboratory testing of obtained samples to determine the properties of the subsoil.

Determination of geotechnical parameters required for foundation analyses.

Carrying out engineering analyses for foundation design.

Boring and Sampling

Standard Penetration Testing

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

Field Permeability Test

Soil Resistity Test (Provisional)

Test Pit (Provisional)

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

Seismic down hole test (Provisional)

Dutch Cone Penetration Test (Provisional)

Unconfined Compression Tests

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

Particle Size Analysis

Unit Weight and Water Content Determination

Oedometer Test /Consolidation test (Provisional)

Compaction Test and CBR Test (Provisional)

Ground Water Analysis

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

Results of all of the above mentioned tests.

Underground water level and borehole elevation.

Licensed engineer sign up responsible for the report

SOIL BORING LOG

ASTM TESTING CO., LTD.

Borehole No. BH-08

SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT

Borehole Elevation = 1.99 m.

Brown, moist, high plasticity,

Brown, moist, medium plasticity,

Brown, moist, high plasticity,

Total Unit Weight

gt = Total Unit Weight

SUMMARY OF GENERAL LABORATORY TEST

ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD.

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

BORE HOLE NO.

END OF BORING AT 24.45 M.

Sandy Clay (CH)

Sandy Clay (CL).

(Estimation of Soil Bearing Capacity)

Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.

Ultimate End Bearing(t/sq.m.)

SOIL BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATION

SHALLOW FOUNDATION SOIL BEARING CAPACITY

Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.

below ground level

NET SOIL BEARING CAPACITY

qall (kPa) qall (t/m2)

1) qall = Net allowable soil bearing capacity

(Recommendation for Pile Capacity and length)

RECOMMENDED PILE LENGTH AND CAPACITY FOR FOR SINGLE PILE

Soil Capacity F.S. =2.5(Tons)

Can not be installed when SPT>=Limit