You are on page 1of 1

Page5

Figure1.1
particular,forsomejustificationsitsufficesthattheplayerssimplyknowtheirownpayoffs.
Wefocusourattentiononfinitegames,thatis,gameswhereS=x
i
S
i
isfinitefinitenessshouldbeassumedwhereverwedonotexplicitlynoteotherwise.Strategic
formsforfinitetwoplayergamesareoftendepictedasmatrices,asinfigure1.1.Inthismatrix,players1and2havethreepurestrategieseach:U,M,D(up,middle,
anddown)andL,M,R(left,middle,andright),respectively.Thefirstentryineachboxisplayer1'spayoffforthecorrespondingstrategyprofilethesecondisplayer
2's.
Amixedstrategy
i
isaprobabilitydistributionoverpurestrategies.(Wepostponethemotivationformixedstrategiesuntillaterinthischapter.)Eachplayer's
randomizationisstatisticallyindependentofthoseofhisopponents,andthepayoffstoaprofileofmixedstrategiesaretheexpectedvaluesofthecorrespondingpure
strategypayoffs.(Onereasonweassumethatthespaceofpurestrategiesisfiniteistoavoidmeasuretheoreticcomplications.)Wewilldenotethespaceofplayeri's
mixedstrategiesby
i
,where
i
(s
i
)istheprobabilitythat
i
assignstos
i
.Thespaceofmixedstrategyprofilesisdenoted =x
i i
,withelement .Thesupportofa
mixedstrategy
i
isthesetofpurestrategiestowhich
i
assignspositiveprobability.Playeri'spayofftoprofile is
whichwedenoteu
i
( )inaslightabuseofnotation.Notethatplayeri'spayofftoamixedstrategyprofileisalinearfunctionofplayeri'smixingprobability
i
,afact
whichhasmanyimportantimplications.Notealsothatplayeri'spayoffisapolynomialfunctionofthestrategyprofile,andsoinparticulariscontinuous.Last,notethat
thesetofmixedstrategiescontainsthepurestrategies,asdegenerateprobabilitydistributionsareincluded.(Wewillspeakofnondegeneratemixedstrategieswhenwe
wanttoexcludepurestrategiesfromconsideration.)
Forinstance,infigure1.1amixedstrategyforplayer1isavector(
1
(U),
1
(M),
1
(D))suchthat
1
(U),
1
(M),and
1
(D)arenonnegativeand
1
(U)+
1
(M)+
1
(D)
=1.Thepayoffstoprofiles are

You might also like