Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SESSION #2 – NOTES
In Game Theory, players strategically interact to either cooperate or enter into a conflict
while taking a rational decision. In this session, we will understand the normal form (or
strategic form), which describes a game using a matrix, with the help of Prisoner's Dilemma.
Further, we will focus on the three major tensions of strategic interaction.
Prisoner's Dilemma: The prisoner's dilemma is one of the most well-known concepts in
modern game theory. It is a paradox in decision analysis in which two individuals acting in
their self-interests do not produce the optimal outcome. The typical prisoner's dilemma is set
up in such a way that both parties choose to protect themselves at the expense of the other
participant. As a result, both participants find themselves in a worse state than if they had
cooperated in the decision-making process.
Assumptions: The game theory model usually rests on a few basic assumptions, which are
discussed below:
Rationality: players usually form a belief about other player's strategies and act
accordingly to select a strategy in a way that maximizes their expected payoffs.
Common Knowledge*: it implies that there is complete and imperfect knowledge.
Under this assumption, it is ensured that players have a shared understanding of the
entire game. The rules (or facts) of the game, as well as each player's payoffs, are
common knowledge.
*Note: Information asymmetry and common knowledge can co-exist.
Strategic Tensions: There are three major tensions of strategic interaction, i.e., the conflict
between individual and group interests, strategic uncertainty, and inefficient coordination.
Let's understand these in detail.