This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/22893763/361FIELDORIENTEDCONTROLOFAMULTILEVELPWMINVERTERFEDINDUCTIONMOTOR
03/18/2014
text
original
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Student Name: Student Number: Supervisor: CoSupervisor:
Ehab Zabaneh 09713828 Dr. W. W. L Keerthipala Ass. Prof. W. Lawrence
8 Bennett Drive CanningVale Perth WA 6155
27th October 2000 Prof. J Hullett Head of School School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Curtin University of Technology Kent Street Bentley Perth WA 6102
Dear Sir,
I have the honour of submitting this project thesis to fulfil the requirements of the Bachelor of Electrical Engineering.
Yours faithfully,
Ehab Zabaneh 09713828
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
ABSTRACT
This report deals with the real time control of an induction motor through vector control analysis implemented through the use of a digital signal processor TMS320. This system provides the gate drive signals to a five level pulse width modulated (PWM) inverter driving an induction motor. Vector control of induction motor is based upon the fieldoriented coordinates aligned in the direction of the rotor m.m.f. However, there is no direct means of measuring the phase angle of the rotor magnetising current β (i.e. the m.m.f. angle) and therefore an observer is needed to estimate β for the implementation of vector control. Two types of observers are used when estimating the rotor flux angle based on the linear and nonlinear model of the induction motor. The linear model of the observer is easier to implement but it does not take into account that the induction motor can operate in the region of saturation
Keywords:
Vector Control, PWM, Field Oriented Control, Induction Motor, Observer, TMS320.
I
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author would like to thank the project supervisor Dr. W. W. L Keerthipala for his help, advice, guidance and continued support for the duration of the project.
Special thanks also to Edward Tsang, my project partner, for his tireless work and excellent inverter design.
Thanks are also extended to the Power Laboratory staff Mark and Zibby for their help and work throughout the duration of the project.
 II 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
NOMENCLATURE
ia, ib, ic iα, iβ id, iq Stator phase currents Stator current components Stator current flux and torque components Stator current flux and torque reference vectors Rotor Flux Angle Rotor Magnetizing Current Moment of Inertia proportional constant and integration constant of PI controller respectively M N P DSP ωr ω LR LS RR RS TR TS 
id ref, iq ref β imR J K1, k2 
Mutual Inductance between stator and rotor Speed of Induction Motor in rpm Output power of induction motor Digital Signal Processor Rotor Angular Speed Motor Speed Rotor Inductance Stator Inductance Rotor Resistance Stator Resistance Rotor Time Constant Stator Time Constant

 III 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................I NOMENCLATURE................................................................................................ III TABLE OF CONTENTS.........................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................... VII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................. 5 2.1 FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL .................................................................................. 5 2.2 OBSERVER MODULES........................................................................................... 9 2.3 DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS ........................................................................... 11 2.3 THREE PHASE INDUCTION MOTOR ..................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 3: THEORY REVIEW........................................................................ 19 3.1 FIVE LEVEL PULSE WIDTH MODULATED (PWM) INVERTER ............................. 20 3.1.1 Five Level Inverter Design ......................................................................... 24 3.1.2 Inverter Gate Control ................................................................................. 31 3.1.3 Verifing proposed design............................................................................ 37 3.1.4 Sine Wave Generator.................................................................................. 38 3.1.5 PWM Signal Generation............................................................................ 38 3.2 THREE PHASE INDUCTION MOTOR ..................................................................... 41
 IV 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
3.2.1 NoLoad Test .............................................................................................. 42 3.2.2 Blocked Rotor Test ..................................................................................... 42 3.3 MATHEMATICAL MODELS.................................................................................. 44 3.3.1 Space Vector Transformation..................................................................... 45 3.3.2 Motor Map – Reference Vector Transformation ........................................ 48 3.3.3 Inverse Space Vector Transformation ........................................................ 50 3.3.4 Rotor Flux Angle β estimation ................................................................... 50 3.4 THE TMS320C40 DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSOR ................................................ 52 CHAPTER 4: SIMULATION RESULTS ............................................................. 59 4.1 PWM INVERTER SIMULATION ........................................................................... 59 4.2 INDUCTION MOTOR SIMULATION ....................................................................... 60 4.3 FIELD ORIENTATED CONTROL SIMULATION ...................................................... 61 4.3.1 Induction Motor and Supply....................................................................... 61 4.3.2 3S to 2R Transformation ............................................................................ 62 4.3.3 Beta Estimation .......................................................................................... 63 CHAPTER 5: SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION ................................................... 65 5.1 CURRENT SENSING............................................................................................. 65 5.1.1 HCPL788J Optocoupler............................................................................ 66 5.1.2 ADS7816 AD Converter............................................................................ 67 5.1.3 Current Sensing Board ............................................................................... 68 5.2 CODE GENERATION............................................................................................ 70 5.2.1 Clarke Transformation Code...................................................................... 73 5.2.2 Park Transformation Code......................................................................... 74
V
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
5.2.3 PI Regulator Code...................................................................................... 75 5.3 FIVE LEVEL PWM INVERTER ............................................................................. 79 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................ 81 6.1 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 81 6.2 FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................ 82 CHAPTER 7: REFERENCES ................................................................................ 84 8.0 APPENDICES .................................................................................................... 88 8.1 APPENDIX A – FIVE LEVEL PWM INVERTER CIRCUIT ....................................... 90 8.2 APPENDIX B – FIVE LEVEL PWM INVERTER OUTPUT GRAPHS .......................... 96 8.3 APPENDIX C – INDUCTION MOTOR SIMULATION CIRCUITS .............................. 100 8.4 APPENDIX D – INDUCTION MOTOR SIMULATION CIRCUITS OUTPUT GRAPHS .. 102 8.5 APPENDIX E – TEXAS INSTRUMENTS TMS320C40 DATASHEET ...................... 105 8.6 APPENDIX F – FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL SIMULATION .................................. 135 8.7 APPENDIX G – FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL SIMULATION OUTPUT GRAPHS ..... 139 8.8 APPENDIX H  HCPL 788J DATASHEET ........................................................... 144 8.9 APPENDIX I – ADS 7816 ANALOGUE TO DIGITAL CONVERTER DATASHEET ... 165 8.9 APPENDIX J – OPTOCOUPLER PCB AND CIRCUIT ............................................. 179 8.10 APPENDIX K – POWER SUPPLY BOARD AND CIRCUIT .................................... 184 9.0 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS............................................................................. 189
 VI 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Complete System Diagram____________________________________ 3 Figure 2.1.1: Vector Transformation _____________________________________ 6 Figure 2.1.1: Vector Control Phasor Diagram _____________________________ 7 Figure 2.1.2: Vector Control System Implementation ________________________ 7 Figure 2.1.3: Speed Control system with constant V/f ration___________________ 8 Figure 2.1.4: Flux and Torque closed loop control __________________________ 9 Figure 2.2.1: Total System Diagram Using ANN Observers __________________ 10 Figure 2.3.1: Pole Configuration _______________________________________ 15 Figure 2.3.2: Torque V Speed Curve for an Induction Motor _________________ 17 Figure 3.1: Field Oriented Control System _______________________________ 19 Figure 3.1.1: Five Level PWM Inverter __________________________________ 23 Figure 3.1.1.1: Diode clamped 5 level inverter. ____________________________ 24 Figure 3.1.1.2: Five level voltage waveform. _____________________________ 26 Figure 1.1.1.3 Level 1 current flow _____________________________________ 27 Figure 3.1.1.4: Level 2 current flow path. ________________________________ 27 Figure 3.1.1.5: Level 3; zero level current flow. ___________________________ 28 Figure 3.1.1.6: Zero level is required to prevent crossover glitch. _____________ 29 Figure 3.1.1.7: Level 4 current flow. ____________________________________ 30 Figure 3.1.1.8: Level 5 current flow. ____________________________________ 30 Figure 3.1.1.9: Level 3; zero level current flow ___________________________ 31 Figure 3.1.2.1: Modulating signal and gate signal relation___________________ 33 Figure 3.1.2.2: Destructive gate sw state. ________________________________ 34
 VII 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.1.2.3: PWM multiplier Circuit. _________________________________ 35 Figure 3.1.5.1: Multicarrier PWM. _____________________________________ 39 Figure 3.1.5.2: PWM generation. _______________________________________ 40 Figure 3.2.1: Induction Motor Equivalent Circuit __________________________ 41 Figure 3.3.1: System Diagram _________________________________________ 45 Figure 3.1.1.1: Clarke Transformation Phasor Diagram ____________________ 46 Figure 3.1.1.2: Park Transformation ____________________________________ 47 Figure 3.3.4.1: Beta Estimation ________________________________________ 51 Figure 3.4.1: The TMS320C40 Pin Grid Array ____________________________ 53 Figure 3.4.2: TMS320C40 Block Diagram________________________________ 56 Figure 3.4.2 (Continued): TMS320C40 Block Diagram _____________________ 57 Figure 4.3.1.1: Induction Motor Simulation_______________________________ 62 Figure 4.3.2.1: 3S to 2R Transformation _________________________________ 63 Figure 4.3.3.1: Beta Estimation ________________________________________ 64 Figure 5.1.1.1: HCPL788J Typical System Diagram _______________________ 67 Figure 5.1.2.1: ADS7816 Pin Configuration ______________________________ 68 Figure 5.1.3.1: Current Sensing Board Circuit ____________________________ 69 Figure 5.1.3.2: Power Supply Schematic _________________________________ 70 Figure 5.2.1: Main Program Flow Chart _________________________________ 72 Figure 5.2.3.1: Classical PI Regulator___________________________________ 75 Figure 5.2.3.2: Numerical PI Regulator with Integral Correction _____________ 76 Figure 5.3.1: Complete Inverter System Diagram __________________________ 79 Figure 5.3.2: Inverter Gate Control Signal _______________________________ 80
 VIII 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Over the past decade thex field orientated or vector control of induction motors has gone through rapid development due to the advancement of the microprocessor. Vector control allows precise controllability of an induction motor, but since the induction motor is a complex multivariable non linear system, vector control requires a large number of fast real time computations to be continually carried out so that the right instantaneous voltages are applied to each stator winding. In essence vector control enables precision control over an induction motors torque and speed as is available from a DC motor.
In this project vector control is simulated and then implemented using a Digital Signal Processor (DSP) the TMS320. This DSP forms the control circuit from which a five level Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) inverter is driven. The PWM inverter will then supply the induction motor with the correct voltage, frequency and phase.
The induction motor that is to be controlled is a squirrel cage induction motor, which produces 2.2 kW. The induction motor is known as the “workhorse” industry due to the extreme simplicity and ruggedness of the squirrel cage construction. The squirrel
1
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
cage motor has a rotor with a winding consisting of conducting bars embedded in slots in the rotor iron and shortcircuited at each end by conducting end rings.
An inverter converts dc voltage from the input to ac voltage at the output. The PWM inverter output ac voltage can be controlled in both magnitude and frequency. This control of voltage and frequency is needed as it allows the user to vary the current, torque and speed of the induction motor at various loads.
The complete system will consist of an ac voltage input that is put through a diode bridge rectifier to produce a dc output which across a shunt capacitor, this will, in turn, feed the PWM inverter. The PWM inverter is controlled to produce a desired sinusoidal voltage at a particular frequency, which is filtered by the use of an inductor in series and capacitor in parallel and then through to the squirrel cage induction motor. The voltage and frequency that the inverter supplies is controlled by the control system which takes its input from the induction motor parameters to produce required speed. The system diagram is shown in Figure 1.1 below.
2
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 1.1: Complete System Diagram
This project will utilise electronics to measure the line currents and motor speed then using digital signal processing to carry out vector control analysis in order to control the switching within the PWM inverter so that the appropriate voltage and frequency is applied to the induction motor. In order to achieve this a good understanding of PWM inverter characteristics and control theory along with solid understanding of squirrel cage induction motor function and parameters must be achieved before commencement of the design process.
In order to simulate the circuits and to validate the design process PSCAD simulation software will be used. Power System Computer Aided Design (PSCAD) is a
graphical based design software that allows the design and simulation of power systems and power electronics components. It allows the viewing of output graphs of any features in the system including internal component parameters. This software will be used to simulate the induction motor and its characteristics under different conditions as well as simulation of the PWM circuit. An advantage of PSCAD is the
3
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
ability to use logic gates to simulate control signals and therefore it will be used to implement control circuits and designs.
From the above the following objectives were set for the project,
•
Gain understanding of Squirrel cage Induction motor characteristics and parameters.
• •
Gain Understanding of Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) Inverter. Understand control techniques of a PWM fed induction motor, in particular vector control.
• •
Simulation of PWM inverter and induction motor using PSCAD software. Simulation of Various circuits and motor connections using PSCAD simulation software.
•
Implement control of induction motor through the use of Digital Signal Processing (DSP).
• •
Implement control circuitry on PCB. Implementation of connection of control circuitry to PWM inverter and induction motor.
•
Testing of system.
4
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
AC motors are of great use in industry due to their low cost, robustness and precise controllability, however only over the past few years that the full potential of the controllability of these motors has been reached. This is due to the development of more powerful microprocessors that can compute long algorithms much faster, which has led to the full control of an induction motor using PWM inverters. This inturn has led to a lot of research conducted over the past few years vector control methods for induction motors and its implementation using digital microprocessors using analogue to digital (A/D) converters.
2.1 Field Oriented Control
The other name for vector control is field orientated control and there has been a lot of work done that uses this type of control to drive an induction motor that is fed by a single level PWM inverter. Due to the complexity of the induction motor a simpler model is needed in order to achieve control [24, 19,17, 26]. Field orientation method gets its name from the fact that control over the motor stems from gaining control over the two components of the stator or field current. In order to achieve this the
5
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
stator current is analysed using a synchronously rotating frame as the reference, with the rotor magnetising current as reference, and then splitting the stator current into two independent components Isd and Isq which respectively control the field and torque of the motor. A diagram of this is shown in figure 2.1.1 [25] below.
Figure 2.1.1: Vector Transformation
A phasor representation is shown below in figure 2.1.1 [26].
6
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 2.1.1: Vector Control Phasor Diagram
A typical field oriented scheme measures the phase currents to the motors and through vector transformations are converted to the rotor DQ frame currents Id and Iq. These vectors are then compared to a set of reference currents Idref and Iqref, the output is then fed through a proportional integral (PI) controller. The outputs from the controllers then go through reverse transformations from the rotor DQ frame back to the stator currents. A usual system diagram is shown below in Figure 2.1.2 [3].
Figure 2.1.2: Vector Control System Implementation
A typical speed control system is with constant volts/hertz control and slip regulation is shown by the block diagram in figure 2.1.3 [29].
7
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 2.1.3: Speed Control system with constant V/f ration
The slip frequency ωs1, which is proportional to torque, is regulated by the speed loop errors. The ωs1 signal is added with speed signal ωr to generate the inverter frequency. The voltage control signal Ve* is generated from the inverter frequency through a function generator so as to maintain airgap flux approximated constant. The drive system accelerates with the clamped value of slip. Instead of regulating slip, it can be maintained constant and the speed loop error may control the dc link voltage [24]. The variation of volts/hertz ratio causes variation of airgap flux and correspondingly the developed torque is regulated.
A slightly modified control system incorporates close loop armature current or power factor control instead of slip control. The flux and torque close loop control is shown in the block diagram in figure 2.1.4 [28].
8
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 2.1.4: Flux and Torque closed loop control
The torque loop error generates the slip command, which is added with the speed to generate the frequency command. The airgap flux may either be maintained constant as in a dc motor or programmed as a function of torque for steady state efficiency improvement. A set of three phase sinusoidal reference current waves is generated and the inverter switching devices are controlled such that the actual current profile remains confined within a hysteresis band. The feedback airgap flux and voltage signals can be estimated from the machine terminal voltages and currents.
2.2 Observer Modules
Field orientated control can be achieved if the angular position of the rotor m.m.f. vector is known, but the rotor magnetising current cannot be measured directly,
9
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
which means that when the machine is rotating the rotor m.m.f. is not known. Therefore, this rotor m.m.f. must be estimated continuously using online observers. The success of the control depends on this estimation. Until recently online
observers have not taken into account the nonlinear parameter variation of the magnetic circuit of the induction motor. Therefore a usual system diagram consisted of an induction motor with a feedback loop to the control circuitry, which then carried out a set of algorithms using DSP, and then it sent the control signals to the PWM inverter. This process will continue online as different load demands are asked of the motor in order to maintain a required speed or torque.
However recently Artificial Neural Network (ANN) observers have been implemented in order to take into account the nonlinear parameter variation. These observers were simulated and results showed that they reduce the realtime requirements for m.m.f. vector estimation greatly. implemented as shown in the Figure 2.2 [6] below. The total system was then
Figure 2.2.1: Total System Diagram Using ANN Observers
 10 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
After these systems were devised the implementation of these systems using microprocessors was then carried out. The main simulation and performance
techniques were carried out on a PC 486 with another microprocessor connected through the serial port and various other control components such as an A/D converter, tachometer circuitry and amplifier circuitry.
2.3 Digital Signal Processors
With the advances in microprocessor technology and DSP controllers there has been a host of commercially available microprocessors that provide PWM module for control of inverters. Typically the signals and algorithms associated with such a system can be very complex and lengthy to compute, however through the use of DSP and the digitisation of the signal, calculation of the output, and the output to the D/A converter all must be completed within the sample clock period, the speed at which this can be done determines the maximum bandwidth that can be achieved with the system. Along with advancement in chips and DSP the PWM module and A/D converters can be all incorporated to provide all the functions needed for a single chip system. A threephase, centrebased PWM controller provides programmable fixed frequency, variable duty cycle, and waveform generation to produce power inverter switching signals. System designers can configure PWM switching deadtime, narrow pulse deletion and other waveform parameters. The PWM controller also features an output enable block that simplifies space vector and
 11 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
sensorless control algorithms, an external hardware trip/reset pin, and a pulsed output mode for transformer coupled gate drivers.
Different types of microprocessors have been utilised in the implementation of field orientated control. The MC68040 has been utilised in both field orientated control and in the implementation of ANN observer estimation of the rotor flux angle. The system also included 4 Mbytes of RAM, two 32pin EPROM sockets, dual port MC68681 I.C. for serial port communication, Local Resource Controller (LRC), VSB and VME bus interfaces. One port of the MC68681 is connected to the 486 PC. The MC68040 operates at 27.6 MIPS with a clock frequency of 33 MHz and 32bit address/data bus.
The TMS320 is a DSP from Texas instruments that has been specifically designed for field orientated control. The TMS320's high level of throughput results from the chip's comprehensive instruction set and highlypipelined architecture. Based on a modified Harvard Architecture, the TMS320 allows transfer between program and data spaces for increased device flexibility. Constants can be stored in program memory, and program branches based on data computations can be performed. Thus, parallel operations can execute a complex instruction in one 200nanosecond (ns) cycle. Competing chips typically execute instructions in 250, 300 or 400ns cycles.
The TMS320's speed in enhanced by the arithmetic logic unit's (ALU's) 16 x 16bit multiplier that uses 16bit, signed 2's complement numbers to form a 32bit product in 200 ns. Although the TMS320 accepts 16bit inputs and has a 16bit output, it
 12 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
features a 32bit ALU/accumulator that carries out all arithmetic operations to 32 places for greater numeric precision [23].
2.3 Three Phase Induction Motor
The AC induction motor has been called the workhorse of the industry due to its wide application and popularity. An induction motor s an AC machine in which alternating current is supplied to the stator armature windings directly and to the rotor winding by induction or transformer action from the stator. The stator
windings of an induction motor are similar to the stator windings of the synchronous machine. However, the rotor windings of the induction motor may be either of two types:
A Wound Rotor: carries three windings similar to the stator windings. The terminals of the rotor windings are connected to the stator windings. The terminals of the rotor windings are connected to insulated slip rings mounted on the rotor shaft. Carbon brushes bearing on these rings make the rotor terminals available to the user of the machine. For the steady state operation these terminals are shorted.
A SquirrelCage Rotor: consists of conducting bars embedded in slots in the rotor magnetic core, and these bars are shortcircuited at each end by conducting end rings. The rotor bars and the rings are shaped like a squirrel cage, hence the name.
 13 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Since the squirrel cage motor is the workhorse of the industry, this paper will only deal with this type of machine.
In an induction motor, the current flowing through windings in the stator sets up a rotating magnetic field. This current also causes an "induced" current to flow through the bars in the. The resultant force causes the rotor to rotate as it continually "chases" the rotating magnetic field and, since the rotor is firmly fixed to the shaft, the shaft also rotates. The basic constructing of an induction motor has not changed
significantly over the past few years.
The stator windings in a motor are there to provide a path for the A.C. current to flow which in turn produces the magnetic field, which will cause the rotor to rotate. The windings are insulated copper wire and inserted into slots in the stator laminations. These slots have insulation between the windings and the steel laminations. This is known as the "stator pack". The windings are designed to provide the output and speed required. The stator pack is, in turn, inserted into the motor casing known as the "stator frame". The ends of the winding are brought out through the motor casing to terminals in a terminal box mounted on the frame. This is where the mains leads are connected.
The rotor consists of laminations, shaft, bearings and a squirrel cage winding. The bars are generally aluminium but can be copper or any such material. The squirrel cage rotor motor is the most common type in use today as it requires simple control
 14 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
gear and, in most cases, can be used instead of a wound rotor motor. The bearings are used to support the shaft and to enable it to rotate.
In practice it is not possible to create one magnetic pole without at the same time creating an equal and opposite pole, so the highest achievable speed for an AC induction motor using a 50 HZ supply is 3000 rpm. It is possible to arrange the
stator windings in such formations as to provide any number of PAIRS of poles and therefore 2,4,6,8,10,12 pole motors are available. Motors over 12 poles are available if required but are not in common use. The number of poles is determined by the number of magnet poles. Figure 2.3.1, below, shows the typical configuration of the poles of an induction motor.
Figure 2.3.1: Pole Configuration
The rated theoretical speed is called the "Synchronous" speed because it is the speed that would be obtained if the rotor rotated in "Synchrony" with the magnetic field. In any AC induction motor, the synchronous speed is never achievable, since friction losses in the bearings, air resistance within the motor and additional drag imposed by
 15 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
the load combine to cause the rotor to lag slightly behind the rotational speed of the magnetic field. This lagging effect is known as the "slip". The "Synchronous" speed of a motor can be determined by the formulae:
Synchronous speed = ns = 120f/P
And the slip is calculated as,
s= ns − nr ns
Where: s = Slip ns = synchronous speed nr = rotor speed f = frequency p = number of poles
If the frequency varies, the speed varies in a direct ratio. The percentage slip varies from one motor to the next and for any given motor the slip will decrease as the load decreases. At no load the slip may be as little as 0.5%, while at full load, depending on the size of the motor, it can be high as 5.0%. Thus typical "Full Load" speeds for 2,4,6 and 8 pole motors, on a 50 Hertz supply, could be 2950, 1470, 980 and 735 rpm respectively, compared with the synchronous speeds of 3000; 1500; 1000 and 750 rpm. It is not surprising to find that the "slip" of a motor is closely related to the
 16 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
motor's efficiency, and in fact, the full load speed of a motor is a good guide to the motor's efficiency.
Torque is the rotational equivalent of linear force and for any rotating machine, if the power and speed are known then the electromagnetic torque is given by the formula:
T=
P
ω
When a motor is driving the load at full speed, the torque developed by the motor will always equal the torque required by the load to keep it running at that speed. The more accurate the motor selection, the closer this torque value will approach the rated full load torque (F.L.T.) of the motor. A typical torque v speed curve for an induction motor is shown in figure 2.3.2 below.
Figure 2.3.2: Torque V Speed Curve for an Induction Motor
 17 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
During the starting cycle (or Run Up Time), however, the torque developed by the motor at any given instant must always exceed the torque required by the load at that particular speed, otherwise the load will not continue to accelerate and the motor will stall. At any given speed during run up, the difference between the motor torque and the load torque is known as the Accelerating Torque and, taken over the complete curve of torque against speed from zero to 100% speed, it is this accelerating torque which determines the run up time. The initial point is known as the Starting torque or locked rotor torque (L.R.T.), the minium point is known as the Pull Up torque (P.U.T.) and the maximum point known as the Pull Out Torque (P.O.T.)
 18 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
CHAPTER 3
THEORY REVIEW
In this project field orientated control is to be implemented using the Texas Instruments TMS320C40 DSP processor. Before practical implementation the
system design is to be simulated using PSCAD/EMTDC software. The system diagram shown below in figure 3.1 is an overview of the field oriented control system to be implemented.
Figure 3.1: Field Oriented Control System
The above system can be split up into three major sections; firstly the five level Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) inverter, the three phase squirrel cage induction motor and the control circuitry. The control circuitry is implemented through the use of the TMS320C40 microprocessor.
 19 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
3.1 Five Level Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) Inverter
There are eleven major subsystems in the five level vector controlled inverter induction motor drive system. It is possible to generate the appropriate gate signals for each of the 8 gates per phase of the inverter digitally but this process is complicated and will make real time calculations required by the vector control algorithm run slower in the DSP. The block diagram shown in figure 3.1.1 below shows the major blocks of the motor drive system with emphasis on the inverter subsystems. The relationship of the vector control unit to the inverter has been clearly shown but the vector control algorithm will not be explained in great detail, as it is the responsibility of the vector control project team.
The appropriate gate signal generation for the three phase five level inverter drive will be generated by separate dedicated hardware components in this design. This allows a modular design process. The project has been split into two parts, one part is the inverter and the other is the vector control feedback system with the combination of both parts and the threephase induction motor forming a complete high performance variable speed, vector controlled drive system.
Referring to figure 3.1.1 below starting form the left hand side, it can be seen the vector control subsystem sends its command data via a programmable interface controller to control the output of the sine wave generator. The sine wave generator
 20 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
takes input parameters of phase, voltage and frequency as 12 bit binary numbers and synthesises the required sine wave with the commanded input data.
The sine wave generated is compared to four offset triangular carriers running at a fixed frequency of 6300Hz. This is done on the PWM board. The output of the PWM board consists of four lines with the appropriate pulse duration for each band of the out put voltage of the inverter.
In order to control eight gates with only four PWM signals the PWM signals must be further processed through an appropriate logic circuit, which will enable the correct four IGBT switches to receive PWM switching pulses depending on the amplitude of the modulating signal. This is done by the Band Detection Board. Finally the PWM pulse data and band data are combined to produce 8 lines, which will provide the correct logic to switch the eight IGBTs on and off to produce a PWM five level waveform.
Typically the control circuits require isolation from the IGBT switching circuits because of the large potential differences from each level on the power switching devices and the low voltage logic controls. This isolation from the logic controls and each gate level is achieved by coupling each gate drive signal through an appropriate optically isolated IGBT driver. The driver also features desaturation detection to sense when the IGBT is being shortcircuited and the voltage drop across the device is not as low as when it is fully switched on therefore producing excessive device heating and possible device damage. The IGBT driver modules have the facility to
 21 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
produce a shut down signal, which will alert protection systems to shut the inverter down safely.
The next block contains the five level inverter. It consists of 8 IGBTs with voltage level clamping diodes to isolate the voltages of each level. There are 4 PWM voltage levels and a zero voltage level to make a total of fiver levels. Four IGBTs are required to switch four series connected voltage sources to produce the five level PWM output waveform. Another four switches are also required with some blocking diodes to provide the bidirectional current switching capability of the inverter to conduct inductive flyback currents.
Finally the inverter power stage with its appropriate four series connected voltage sources is connected to the induction motor in either star or delta connection. The phase currents and voltages will then be measured, put through linear optical isolation, scaled and fed to the ADC of the TMS320 DSP. The DSP will perform the required vector control algorithms to calculate the required phase, voltage and frequency the inverter must produce in order to keep the induction motor speed running close to the desired value.
 22 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.1.1: Five Level PWM Inverter
 23 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
3.1.1 Five Level Inverter Design
To support inductive loads the five level inverter must be constructed in a way in which bidirectional current flow for all levels is supported otherwise problems explained in the previous section will occur. Figure 3.1.1.1 shows the basic single phase switching circuit for the five level inverter which supports inductive loads.
Figure 3.1.1.1: Diode clamped 5 level inverter.
A minimum of 8 switches are required to generate the five level waveform. The capital letters in figure 3.1.1.1 denote the complement of the signal present on the gates of the lower case gates. This implies that at any instant in time there must at lest be 4 switches which must be active. The diodes labelled DP1 to DP3 and DN! To DN3 are voltage level blocking diodes. Their job is to prevent a short circuit of the
 24 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
series connected voltage sources during switching of the IGBTs and to provide inductive return paths to support bidirectional current flow involved with all inductive loads. Detailed diagrams will we presented to describe the current flows in the converter topology presented above. The advantage of this design is the switching elements are only exposed to the voltage of one voltage level therefore reducing the stress on the switch during hard switching (switching when the voltage and currents are not zero). The disadvantage is multiple switches are required ie 2(N1) switches and [2(N1)]2 voltage level clamping diodes are required, where N denotes the number of levels. So in this case N=5 which means the number of IGBTs required to build a five level inverter is 2(51) = 8 and the number of clamping diodes is 2 less than the number of switches therefore requiring 6 blocking diodes. The blocking diodes must be rated to withstand the load current. Inverter current flow
The current flows for the five level power processing circuit shown in figure 3.1.1.1 is best described by the following diagrams. The output voltage waveform of the inverter is displayed in figure 3.1.1.2. The top of level 1 is the first band the top level 2 the second band and so on. The zero (level 3) level does not contain a band because there is no PWM switching taking place at this level but the modulation signal does however have a band in which it classified to belong to the third level.
 25 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Levels V 1pu
1 2 3
0
4
1pu
5
Figure 3.1.1.2: Five level voltage waveform.
The current flow through the five level inverter in figure 3.1.1.1 to produce the top level is depicted in figure 3.1.1.3 below. The lower case labels on the IGBTs are switched by a complementary gating signal to the gates labelled with upper case letters. The current flows through q1, q2, q3, and q4 to produce the top voltage level (level 1 of figure 3.1.1.2).
The top voltage level is pulse width modulated this means q1 switches on and off at the carrier frequency of 6300Hz as shown in figure 3.1.1.3.
 26 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 1.1.1.3 Level 1 current flow
Voltage level 2 in figure 3.1.1.3 is generated by turning q1 off and Q1 on. It should be noted that Q1 actually does not conduct any current yet as it is not forward biased due to the present current flow path. Current now flows from a single capacitor voltage source V1+ and clamping diode DP1 to deliver half the previous bus voltage to one phase of the motor load. This is shown in figure 3.1.1.4 below.
Figure 3.1.1.4: Level 2 current flow path.
 27 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
The next voltage level in figure 3.1.1.2 is the zero voltage level. This level is created by connection of the load to no voltage sources ( short circuit ) . This allows the lagging inductive current to pass through the inverter when the leading voltage is 0V. This is depicted in figure 3.1.1.5 below.
Figure 3.1.1.5: Level 3; zero level current flow.
The next diagram graphically shows the importance of the zero level. Figure 3.1.1.6 is a plot of current and voltage through one phase of the inductive load. It can bee seen the current is lagging the voltage.
 28 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.1.1.6: Zero level is required to prevent crossover glitch.
If q3 and q4 are not conducting during the change over from positive to negative polarity the voltage waveform will contain a glitch at the zero crossing point in the voltage waveform. The first glitch in figure 3.1.1.6 results from open circuiting a negative current which is lagging the voltage which has already reached the zero point. The voltage across the inductive load will thus be Vl= Ldi/dt which results in a positive voltage spike. The opposite happens for the negative cycle of the waveform. Appendix A1 is the simulated verification of this glitch problem if the zero level gates are not properly turned on at the required instance. The negative voltage cycle is generated in a similar way to the positive half cycle .
The current now must flow in the opposite direction to the positive half cycle. The current in the negative direction flows from the bottom to the top on the load as compared to the top to the bottom for figure 3.1.1.3 to 3.1.1.5 demonstrating the
 29 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
positive direction current flow. So continuing on from the zero voltage level, the next level is 1V level which is level 4 . The current flow for level 4 is displayed in figure 3.1.1.7 below.
Figure 3.1.1.7: Level 4 current flow.
The final level is created by forcing 2 voltage sources connected in series in the negative direction through the inverter as shown in figure 3.1.1.8.
Figure 2.1.1.8: Level 5 current flow.
The only current flow pattern which is left to discuss is the negative transition to zero level. This is the opposite to figure 3.1.1.5 which is level 3 and is shown in figure 3.1.1.9.
 30 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.1.1.9: Level 3; zero level current flow
3.1.2 Inverter Gate Control
After studying the different possible current paths it is possible to form a table of gate control logic to control the inverter. This is done by simply tracing the current flow through the switches of the diagrams in chapter 5 and forming a table for all the possible different combinations of switch operation to generate a sine AC waveform depending on the band the modulating signal is in. It is clear that the modulating sine wave will have the same phase relationship with the final output wave form therefore if sensors are used to detect which band the modulating signal is in then the correct IGBT group can be activated in the inverter to switch the current. The initial table formed is shown below in table 3.1.2.1. Combination Gate states mod>0 mod> 0.1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 (mod> (mod> (mod> 1) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.1) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1) 0 0 0 0 0 1 q 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 q 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 q q Q Q Q Q 3 4 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 3 4 5 Band
Table 3.1.2.1: Gate combinations and output relation.
 31 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
The zero level is different to level 1, 2, 4, 5 in the way that it does not occupy a band of significant thickness. This will cause serious problems if the control device which is responsible for detecting the band the modulating signal. The reason is the zero voltage level is extremely noisy with up to 30mV of switching noise from other control processes sharing the same regulated DC power supply. So if we wanted to know if the modulating signal has crossed the zero point, by using a comparator the noise would cause the output to go high permanently thus giving useless results to down stream control processes.
The band detection and IGBT gate selection problem
with results which are
tabulated in table 3.2.1.2 is described graphically in figure 3.1.2.1 below. This figure is important due to the fact that it makes it easier to grasp the problem and devise a simple solution.
2 PWM LEVEL 2+ 1 PWM LEVEL 1+ 0.1 0
1 2 3
PWM LEVEL 1PWM LEVEL2
(per unit)
BAND DETECTION
4 5
0.1 1 2
Q1
Q2 Q3 Q4 PRIMARY GATE SIGNA Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
 32 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.1.2.1: Modulating signal and gate signal relation
From this graphical representation the reasons for the limits set on detecting the band the modulating signal is in can easily be seen. The other important point to be made is that the solid fill on the rows , represent the time in which particular sets of 4 gates should be active according to the band the modulating signal is in.
Now it seems it is a simple matter of creating a lookup table in an embedded microcontroller to implement table 3.1.2.1 and control the 8 IGBTs in each phase of the inverter. This is not possible if the inverter is to be pulse width modulated at a high frequency (5000Hz). The reason is the inverter gates q1, q2, Q3,Q4 are switched at the carrier frequency ( 5000Hz) This means in order to obey the general rule that at any time only 4 gates are to be active , the microcontroller cannot respond fast enough to be able to detect band combinations and also “multiply: the correct pulse data into the output gate signals which control the IGBTs. This will result in more than 4 gates being on at any one time. The consequences of disobeying the “4 gates on” rule will result in a short circuit of the DC bus through the IGBTs. For example take the case if q1 is switching rapidly on and off , this means Q1 which is its complement must also do the same but be 180º out of phase.
 33 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Lets assume for some reason there was an error in the drive logic and both q1 and Q1 were on at the same instant then the following current path will flow through the inverter as depicted in figure 3.1.2.2.
Figure 3.1.2.2: Destructive gate sw state.
 34 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
The top DC voltage source will short circuit through the 5 switches which are active thus destroying them. The solution to this problem is to feed the complementary gate signal from an inverter gate which derives its signal from the appropriate PWM level. This is shown in figure 3.1.2.3 below.
Figure 3.1.2.3: PWM multiplier Circuit.
To understand how the above circuit operates the following basic facts should be noted: There are eight active IGBT switches that must me controlled ie switch s1 to s8 The capital letters denote the complementary signal of the lower case signal
 35 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Only q1,q2,Q3,Q4 require the PWM signal to be combined with the gate signals generated by a microcontroller lookup table with the data coming out port RB7, RB6, RB1, RB0.
Table 3.1.2.1 which displays the required gate control logic can now be simplified to that shown in table 3.1.2.2. The shaded region represents timing data which is now redundant as it has been implemented by dedicated hardware inverter gates which feed the complementary switching signals to the required gates q3,q4,Q1,Q2 to avoid the short circuiting problem previously mentioned.
Combination
Gate states
Band
mod>0 mod> 0.1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
(mod> (mod> (mod> 1) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.1) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1) 0 0 0 0 0 1
q 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
q 2 1 1 0 0 0 0
q q Q Q Q Q 3 4 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 3 4 5
Table 3.1.2.2: Shaded regions logic is implemented by inverter gates
 36 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
As a result of the simplification of the control table , four output lines are not required to be connected from the microcontroller. Refering to figure 41 the inputs to the AND gates are from port B of the microcontroller the details of the hardware connections are summarised in table 4 below.
port No RB0 RB1 RB2 RB3 RB4 RB5 RB6 RB7 connected to gate via IGBT No AND gate q1 q2 nc nc nc nc Q3 Q4
Table 3.1.2.3: Connection relationship between look up table outputs and gates
3.1.3 Verifing proposed design
The logic design outlined in section 6.1 first must be verified by simulation for its logical accuracy. Basically at this stage of simulations details such as the output voltage and THD are not of major concern but the main aim is to try to obtain the correct output waveform. This sounds easy but there are some critical timing issues involved at this point in the simulation.
Firstly the software package used for the simulation of the control system was Power Systems Computer Aided Design. The reason why this package was chosen was its wide choice of standardised control components such as op amp integrators and power electronic devices from the flexible AC transmission library. Also the
 37 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
THD for the three phase output voltage and current can also be easily simulated in PSCAD. The major advantage of PSCAD over a package such as MATLAB is the mathematical models of the power switches is already written. The other software which is also suitable for this work is PSPICE. The reason why this package was not used was mainly due to the fact that a full version of the software was not available to simulate complex control circuits.
3.1.4 Sine Wave Generator.
The main part of the control block consists of 4 major blocks. The first block is the modulation signal generator which produces sine waves from three input parameters. These are the peak to peak amplitude, phase displacement and frequency. The sine signal is responsible for modulating the output pulse widths of the final synthesised sine wave. It therefore can be identified as a major subsystem in the control scheme of the inverter. The sine signal generator can easily be translated into hardware by using a digital signal processing device. A commonly available device to perform this function is called a numerically controlled oscillator. It accepts three input of phase, frequency and amplitude and produces an analogue sine wave in 6 clock cycles using the specified inputs.
3.1.5 PWM Signal Generation.
The next block is the pulse width modulation signal generator. For multilevel inverters namely a five level inverter (n=5) we require n1 carrier signals to generate the pulse width signals to control the output. Basically the generated sine signal is
 38 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
fed into four comparators which compare the modulating sine wave to four triangular carrier signal. This comparison is shown in figure 3.1.5.1 below.
Figure 3.1.5.1: Multicarrier PWM.
From the above figure it can be seen that the carrier signals are of a higher frequency than the modulating signal and also displaced into four bands. The phase displacement of the carriers are in phase and the amplitude is such that the carrier signals do not overlap into the adjacent bands for the modulation scheme chosen for this project. If we assume that the hight of each carrier signal is 1 pu, then the modulating signal must be at lest 4 pu in amplitude
Attention must be paid to the way the comparator is connected. The function of a simple comparator is to decide if the input value to the comparator is greater than the reference value. If so the output of the comparator will be high otherwise the output is low. This is shown in figure 3.1.5.2 below. This process occurs for each of the four carriers. The negative polarity of the sine wave requires the inputs to the comparator to be reversed so that when the sinemodulating signal is smaller than the carrier the output is 1.
 39 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.1.5.2: PWM generation.
Typically the comparator function is implemented using an operational amplifier without feedback so when the input value exceeds the reference input value the output voltage “swings” polarity and saturates quickly in the new direction thus producing pulse level waveforms.
 40 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
3.2 Three Phase Induction Motor
The induction motor used for this project is a three phase 2.2kW, 1420rpm, 2.6A 440V motor. In order to carry out the field oriented control implementation the parameters of the induction machine must be known. In order to achieve this the induction motor must be simplified into its equivalent twoaxis model. This model is shown in figure 3.2.1 below [19].
Figure 3.2.1: Induction Motor Equivalent Circuit
In order to get the induction motor parameters two tests are carried out. Firstly the Noload test is performed to obtain the shunt parameters of the motor, which represent the magnitude current and its core loss. The test is performed at rated frequency, and the voltage applied to the motor is rated voltage. Secondly the BlockedRotor test is carried out. In this test, as its name suggests, the rotor of the induction motor is blocked so that it cannot move. The blocked rotor test is
performed at 25% of the rated frequency. From these tests the induction motor stator and rotor inductances and resistance were determined.
 41 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
3.2.1 NoLoad Test
The noload test was performed to obtain the shunt parameters of the motor and the following was measured,
R1 = R2 = R3 = 11.3 Ω Vnl = 407 V Inl = 2.41 A Pnl = 152 W pf = 0.09 Therefore the following can be calculated, kVAr = 1.69 kVA = 1.69 f = 50 Hz
Vnph = Vn = 407V In 2.41 Inph = = = 1.39 A 3 3 Pn 152 Pnph = = == 50.67W 3 3 Pnph − I 2 nph x r1 50.67 − 1.39 2 x113 Pcph = = = 14.29W 2 2 V 2 nph 407 2 rc = = = 11.503kΩ Pcph 14.39 Pnph 50.67 cosθm = = = 0.089 Vnph I nph 407 x1.39
θn = 84.867 o Lagging
3.2.2 Blocked Rotor Test
The blockedrotor test was performed and the following parameters were measured, Vsc = 97.2V VAr = 659
 42 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Isc = 4.63A Psc = 413 pf = 0.53
VA = 777 f = 50Hz
Therefore the following can be calculated,
Vscph = Vsc = 97.2V I sph = Pscph = 2.67 3 3 P 413 = sc = = 137.67W 3 3 Pscph Vscph I scph = 0.5304 I sc = 4.63
cosθ sc =
θ sc = 57.96 o Lagging
Ze = Vscph I scph ∠θ sc = 97.2 ∠ − 57.96 o = 36.362∠ − 57.96 o 2.67
Z e = 19.29 − j 30.82 Z e = Re − jX e Therefore, r2 = 19.29 − 11.3 = 7.99Ω
The rotor resistance per phase is then 7.99 ohm per phase, also
 43 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
X L = jωL j 30.82 = jx 2πx50 xL Therefore, L = 98.10mH L LR = = 49.05mH 2
Using the above the rotor time constant can also be calculated,
TR =
LR 49.05mH = = 6.14m sec RR 7.99
The values calculated above can now be used in all of the vector calculations and the transformations.
3.3 Mathematical Models
The TMS320C40 digital signal processor will perform many mathematical derivations and these can be broken up into sections as in the system diagram shown below in figure 3.3.1.
 44 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.3.1: System Diagram
The areas circled red in the above diagram represent a certain part of the vector transformation. These are,
1. 3S to 2R Space Vector Transformation 2. Motor Map – Reference Vector Transformation 3. 2R to 3S Space Vector Transformation
The above transformations involve heavy mathematics and as such are computed using the TMS320C40 microprocessor. The above vectorial transformations are explained fully in the following sections.
3.3.1 Space Vector Transformation
The control system will continually measure the stator voltages applied to the induction motor. These measurements will then go through a set of vector
transformations or projection in order to transform them into the rotor DQ frame.
 45 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
The stator currents are measured using Current Transformers (CT) and the analogue input is fed through to the processor. These signals will then go through two sets of transformations so that they are in rotor coordinates. The first is the Clarke
transformation, which converts the stator currents into another reference frame with only two orthogonal axis called (α,β. Assuming that the stator axis a and the axis α are in the same direction then the following can be performed,
⎡ 1 ⎡ Iα ⎤ ⎢ ⎢ Iβ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎣ ⎦ ⎢ 0 ⎢ ⎣
−
1 2 3 2
1 ⎤ ⎡I ⎤ a 2 ⎥⎢I ⎥ ⎥ 3 ⎥⎢ b ⎥ − ⎢I ⎥ 2 ⎥⎣ c ⎦ ⎦ −
Using the above the phasor diagram shown in figure 3.3.1.1 [23] below can be drawn.
Figure 3.1.1.1: Clarke Transformation Phasor Diagram
 46 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
The Park transformation can now be carried out.
This is the most important
transformation in field orientated control. This projection modifies a two phase orthogonal system (α,β into the DQ rotating frame. This transformation relies on the assumption that the d axis is aligned with the rotor flux and this is shown in figure 3.1.1.2 [23].
Figure 3.1.1.2: Park Transformation
The angle θ shown in the above diagram is the rotor flux angle. As previously discussed this cannot be measured directly but is estimated, an analysis of the estimation method is discussed further in this chapter. The flux and torque
components of the current vector are determined by the following set of equations: ⎡ Id ⎤ ⎡ cosθ ⎢ Iq ⎥ = ⎢− sin θ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ sin θ ⎤ ⎡ Iα ⎤ cosθ ⎥ ⎢ Iβ ⎥ ⎦⎣ ⎦
Using the above transformations the stator currents are now in the reference DQ frame. These currents will now need to be compared to a set of reference DQ parameters. These reference values are determined by the required values of speed
 47 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
and torque. As shown in the previous system diagram these required values of speed and torque are put through a motor map that produces the reference parameters of the DQ frame.
3.3.2 Motor Map – Reference Vector Transformation
The induction motor can be represented by a simplified model. This simplified model is shown in the following matrix.
M ⎡ P ⎢ R1 + Lo P − Loω o L2 ⎡ e1α ⎤ ⎢ M ωo R1 + Lo P ⎢ e ⎥ ⎢ Loω o L2 ⎢ 1β ⎥ = ⎢ R2 ⎢ e2α ⎥ ⎢ M +P 0 ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ − L R2 L2 e2 β ⎦ ⎢ 2 ⎢ ⎣ ⎥ ⎢ M − 0 R2 ω o − ω r ⎢ L2 ⎣ ⎤ ⎥ ⎥⎡i ⎤ ⎥ ⎢ 1α ⎥ ⎥ ⎢ i1β ⎥ ⎥ ⎢i ⎥ − (ω o − ω r )⎥ ⎢ 2α ⎥ ⎥ ⎢i2 β ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎥ R2 +P ⎥ L2 ⎦ − M ωo L2 M P L2
From the above the torque equation of the induction machine can be computed. Power input to the induction motor can be divided into three components, the winding resistance loss, magnetic energy stored in the machine and power output. Therefore,
Pin = i T v = [i ] [ R + L p + Gω ][i ]
T
[ ]
Where,
⎡ Rs 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎢ 0 Rs 0 0 ⎥ ⎥ R=⎢ ⎢ 0 0 Rs 0 ⎥ ⎥ ⎢ Rs ⎣ 0 0 0  48  ⎦
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
⎡ Ls 0 ⎢ 0 Ls L=⎢ ⎢M 0 ⎢ ⎢0 M ⎣
⎡ 0 ⎢ 0 G=⎢ ⎢ 0 ⎢ ⎣− M 0 0 M 0
M 0 LR 0
0 0 0
0⎤ ⎥ M⎥ 0⎥ ⎥ LR ⎥ ⎦
0⎤ 0⎥ ⎥ LR ⎥ ⎥ 0⎦
− LR
p=
d , dt
⎡i sa ⎤ ⎢i ⎥ i = ⎢ sb ⎥ ⎢i xa ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣i xb ⎦
and
⎡ v sa ⎤ ⎢v ⎥ v = ⎢ sb ⎥ ⎢v xa ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣v xb ⎦
Therefore the mechanical power output is,
Pout = i T Gωi
And therefore the torque equation can be written as,
τe =
Pout
ω
 49 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
3.3.3 Inverse Space Vector Transformation
Once the actual values from the Park transformation are compared to the reference values from the motor map the output will need to go through the inverse Park transformation in order to give the required current in the stator frame.
⎡ Iα ⎤ ⎡ cosθ ⎢ Iβ ⎥ = ⎢− sin θ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣
sin θ ⎤ ⎡ I dnew ⎤ ⎢ ⎥ cosθ ⎥ ⎣ I qnew ⎦ ⎦
−1
The above equations are then used to transform into equivalent stator currents. The TMS320C40 Microprocessor will then send the five level inverter three digital outputs namely, the required voltage, frequency and phase. From there the inverter will produce its own switching logic.
3.3.4 Rotor Flux Angle β estimation
The transformations shown above depend on the rotor flux angle β for their calculations. However, as there are no means of measuring this angle online it has to be estimated. There are two general classes of estimations, linear and nonlinear. The ANN Observer model discussed previously is an example of the nonlinear model and is a more accurate approximation, however, due to simplicity of design the linear model was chosen as the method of the estimation.
 50 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
This linear model requires three inputs Ia, Ib, ω and also the rotor time constant. The three inputs will be measured directly and the rotor time constant was derived from the parameter tests performed on the induction motor as is shown below,
LR RR
TR =
The complete estimation diagram is shown below in figure 3.3.4.1.
Figure 3.3.4.1: Beta Estimation
The above system shows that the stator currents are multiplied by the inverse of the rotor time constant and are then added to the negative sum of the integral divided by the rotor time constant plus the multiple of the rotor angular speed and the integral of the other stator current.
 51 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
3.4 The TMS320C40 Digital Signal Processor
Carrying out all of the mathematics above will be the TMS320C40 digital signal processor. The particular model of the DSP that was acquired is the
TMS320C40GFL50, which is a high performance floating point digital signal processor. It is a fast microprocessor with a 50MHz clock cycle. The '320C40 digital signal processors (DSPs) are 32bit, floatingpoint processors manufactured in 0.72um, doublelevel metal CMOS technology [23]. The '320C40 is a part of the fourth generation of DSPs from Texas Instruments and is designed primarily for parallel processing.
The processor is delivered as a 325 pin grid array package as shown in figure 3.4.1 [23] below.
 52 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.4.1: The TMS320C40 Pin Grid Array
The processor has the following features [23],
•
33ns Instruction Cycle Time, 330 MOPS, 60 MFLOPS, 30 MIPS, 384M Bytes/s
•
'320C4050: 40ns Instruction Cycle Time
 53 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
•
'320C4040: 50ns Instruction Cycle Time
• • • • • •
Six Communications Ports SixChannel Direct Memory Access (DMA) Coprocessor SingleCycle Conversion to and From IEEE754 FloatingPoint Format Single Cycle, 1/x<> SourceCode Compatible With TMS320C3x SingleCycle 40Bit FloatingPoint, 32Bit Integer Multipliers
•
Twelve 40Bit Registers, Eight Auxiliary Registers, 14 Control Registers, and Two Timers
• •
IEEE 1149.1 (JTAG) Boundary Scan Compatible Two Identical External Data and Address Buses Supporting Shared Memory Systems and High DataRate, SingleCycle Transfers: • • • • • High PortData Rate of 120M Bytes/s ('C4060) (Each Bus) 16GByte Continuous Program/Data/Peripheral Address Space MemoryAccess Request for Fast, Intelligent Bus Arbitration Separate AddressBus, DataBus, and ControlEnable Pins Four Sets of MemoryControl Signals Support Different Speed Memories in Hardware
• •
325Pin Ceramic Grid Array (GF Suffix) Fabricated Using 0.72um Enhanced Performance Implanted CMOS (EPICTM) Technology by Texas Instruments (TITM)
 54 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
• • •
SoftwareCommunicationPort Reset NMI\ With BusGrant Feature Separate Internal Program, Data, and DMA Coprocessor Buses for Support of Massive Concurrent Input/Output (I/O) of Program and Data Throughput, Maximising Sustained Central Processing Unit (CPU) Performance
•
OnChip Program Cache and DualAccess/SingleCycle RAM for Increased MemoryAccess Performance • • • 512Byte Instruction Cache 8K Bytes of SingleCycle DualAccess Program or Data RAM ROMBased Boot Loader Supports Program Bootup Using 8, 16, or 32Bit Memories or One of the Communication Ports
•
•
IDLE2 ClockStop PowerDown Mode 5V Operation
A block diagram of the processor is shown in figure 3.4.2 [23] below.
 55 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.4.2: TMS320C40 Block Diagram
 56 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 3.4.2 (Continued): TMS320C40 Block Diagram
 57 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
The TMS320C40 has six onchip communication ports for processor to processor communications with no external hardware and simple communication software. These communication ports remove input/output bottlenecks, and the independent smart DMA coprocessor is able to handle the CPU input/output burden.
The TMS320C40 is supported by a host of parallel processing development tools for developing and simulating code easily and for debugging parallel processing systems. Its code generation tools include and ANSI C complier, operating system support for parallel processing as well as DMA and communication port drivers, and an assembler linker with support for mapping program and data to parallel processors. Its simulation tools include parallel DSP systemlevel simulation and TI’s software simulator with high language debugger.
The complete TMS320C40 datasheets are included in Appendix E.
 58 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
CHAPTER 4
SIMULATION RESULTS
In order to verify the design principles simulations were carried out. Power Systems Computer Aided Design (PSCAD) is a software tool that allows the simulation of complex systems with relative ease. One of the biggest advantages of PSCAD is its ability to also process logic circuits, which is of vital importance when modelling vector control systems.
4.1 PWM Inverter Simulation
A five level PWM inverter was designed and tested by Edward Tsang as part of his final year project. The simulation verified the PWM inverter design and the practical implementation is in progress. The PWM inverter simulation results are included in appendix A and B.
 59 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
4.2 Induction Motor Simulation
The squirrel cage induction motor can be simulated using PSCAD due to the existing motor model that can be edited to suite the requirements at hand. The particular model used had the following parameters,
• •
2.5kW or 3.34 Hp 240 V at 50Hz
Using the above parameters the simulation of the induction motor was carried. In order to demonstrate the effect of changing the parameters of the induction motor, the torque, speed and slip variables were varied and the results were observed using the output graphs. The circuit diagram used consisted of a 3phase 240V 50Hz supply connected through a transmission line to the induction motor. The Schematic diagram drawn is shown in appendix C.
The simulation results further proved the induction motor theory; as such it was shown as the slip increases the torque increases until it reaches a particular point and then decreases until the rotational speed is equal to the synchronous speed or when the slip is equal to zero. The output graphs shown in Appendix D demonstrate the results observed.
 60 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
It is also important to note that the induction motor simulation assumed ideal conditions and parameters. Therefore, after laboratory tests are performed on the induction motor “real” parameters can be incorporated into the induction motor model to provide a more realistic output during simulation.
4.3 Field Orientated Control Simulation
For ease of simulation the field oriented control was split into 4 separate systems for simulation. These were,
1. Induction Motor Supply 2. 3S to 2R Transformation – Transformation of the stator currents into rotor dq frame. 3. Beta Estimation – Estimation of the rotor flux angle. 4. Motor Map – Calculation of Reference Id and Iq.
4.3.1 Induction Motor and Supply
As the five level inverter was not yet ready an approximate model of a three phase supply was used with controlled voltage, frequency and phase. This supplied the induction motor directly. The induction motor parameters were adjusted to match the actual motor used. The circuit used is shown in figure 4.3.1.1 below.
 61 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 4.3.1.1: Induction Motor Simulation
The output results and full system diagram are shown in appendix F.
4.3.2 3S to 2R Transformation
The stator currents to rotor frame transformation involved a number of different calculations. The inputs to the system are the three line currents and the rotor flux angle. The rotor flux angle is an output of another subsystem. The system diagram is shown below in figure 4.3.2.1.
 62 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 4.3.2.1: 3S to 2R Transformation
The full system diagram is shown in appendix F.
4.3.3 Beta Estimation
In accordance with the theory discussed in the previous section the beta estimation was carried out. The three inputs Ia, Ib and ω are put through computations and the beta angle output is used by other parts of the system. The estimation diagram in PSCAD is shown below in figure 4.3.3.1.
 63 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 4.3.3.1: Beta Estimation
The full estimation diagram is shown in appendix F.
The output graphs from all of the above simulations for field orientated control are shown in appendix G.
 64 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
CHAPTER 5
SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION
The system implementation was carried out using both hardware and software. Optocoupler sensors are utilised to sample the three phase currents then the signal is converted to digital format. The vector transformations are implemented using
machine code which is then downloaded to the TMS320C40 digital signal processor.
5.1 Current Sensing
In order to carry out the aforementioned vector transformations the values of the stator currents must be known. Thus a current sensing board was required to give feedback to the digital signal processor. Therefore currents sensors have been
employed to sample the stator currents whilst also isolating the system from the high voltage side. The isolated analogue output signal from the current sensors would then need to be converted to digital format before being sent to the digital signal processor. The sensor that was chosen for this project is the Hewlett Packard HCPL788J Optocoupler. The output of the Optocoupler is fed to a BurrBrown ADS7816 12 bit analoguedigital converter.
 65 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
5.1.1 HCPL788J Optocoupler
The HCPL788J isolation amplifier is designed for current sensing in electronic motor drives. In a typical implementation, motor currents would flow through a shunt resistor and the resulting analogue voltage drop is sensed by the HCPL788J. A larger analogue output voltage is created on the other side of the HCPL788J’s isolation barrier. The output voltage is proportional to the motor current and can be connected directly to a single supply analogue to digital converter. A digital overrange output is useful for quick detection of short circuit conditions on any of the phases. Due to the swings of the common mode voltage in nanoseconds the HCPL788J was designed to ignore very high common node slew rates (10kV/µs). A typical system diagram is shown below in figure 5.1.1.1.
 66 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 5.1.1.1: HCPL788J Typical System Diagram
The full datasheet for the HCPL788J is provided in Appendix H.
The analogue voltage input Vin, shown in figure 5.1.1.1, is converted to a digital signal and is sampled 6 million times per second and then a 1bit output representing the input very accurately is generated. This data stream is then transmitted via a light emitting diode (LED) over the optical barrier after encoding. The detector then converts the optical signal back to a bit stream which is converted from digital to analogue then put through a low pass filter and outputted through the Vout pin as shown in figure 5.1.1.1.
5.1.2 ADS7816 AD Converter
The ADS7816 is a 12bit, 200kHz sampling analoguetodigital converter.
It
features low power operation with automatic power down, a synchronous serial interface and a differential input. The reference voltage can be varied from 100mV to 5V, with a corresponding resolution from 24µV to 1.22mV. The standard pin configuration is shown in figure 5.1.2.1.
 67 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 5.1.2.1: ADS7816 Pin Configuration
The analogue input is provided to two pins: +In and –In. When the conversion is initiated, the differential input on these pins is sampled on the internal capacitor array. While a conversion is in progress, both inputs are disconnected from any internal function. The digital result of the conversion is clocked out by the
DCLOCK input and is provided serially, most significant bit first, on the DOUT pin. The digital data that is provided on the DOUT pin is for the conversion currently in progressthere is no pipeline delay. It is possible to continue to clock the ADS7816 after the conversion is complete and to obtain the serial data least significant bit first. The full datasheet is shown in Appendix I.
5.1.3 Current Sensing Board
The integration of the current sensing HCPL788J and the analogue to digital converter ADS7816 will provide the input to the TMS320C40 digital signal processor. The current sensing circuit is also implemented on a printed circuit board. The implementation circuit diagram is shown in figure 5.1.3.1 below.
 68 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 5.1.3.1: Current Sensing Board Circuit
The operation of the board is as follows; the input signals from the three shunt resistor, one for each phase, are fed into the inputs of the three HCPL788J optocouplers where the signal is isolated and amplified. The output of the
optocouplers is fed to the inputs on the TMS320C40 digital signal processor. The timing with the DSP is provided through the CLOCK input on the analogue to digital converters. The full circuit diagram and the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) layout are shown in Appendix J.
In order for the above design to be implemented an isolated and non isolated 5 volt supplies are needed. Therefore another circuit and printed circuit board were
designed to supply the required power. This circuit required one single phase step down transformer with two secondaries, one isolated and one not isolated, feeding
 69 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
two full bridge rectifiers. The output voltage of the rectifiers is regulated using LM320 transistors. Therefore two 5V outputs are fed to the optocoupler board as required. The circuit diagram is shown in figure 5.1.3.2 below.
Figure 5.1.3.2: Power Supply Schematic
The full circuit diagram and the PCB layout diagram are shown in Appendix K.
5.2 Code Generation
The vector transformations can be carried out in the TMS320C40 digital signal processor using machine language. Therefore all transformations have to be done in machine language before downloading to the digital signal processor. Some of code development has been based on the Texas Instruments recommendations for field oriented control code development. In order to simplify the program a flow chart
 70 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
was formed that showed the flow of signals and calculations that are required. The flow chart of the main program is shown in figure 5.2.1 below.
 71 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Figure 5.2.1: Main Program Flow Chart
 72 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
The program sections have been broken up into smaller programs and are represented below. It is important to note that the code developed for
implementation in 4.12 format.
5.2.1 Clarke Transformation Code
The following is the code developed for the Clarke transformation. ********************************************* * * Clarke Transformation (a,b,c) > (Ialpha,Ibeta)
********************************************* lacc sacl add neg sac1 ic ia isalpha ib
lacc add sac1 lt mpy
ib,1 ia tmp tmp #SSQRT3inv
;isbeta = (2*ib + ia)/sqrt(3)
;SQRT3inv=(1/sqrt(3))=093dh
pac sach isbeta
********************************************* * End Clarke Transformation
*********************************************
 73 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
The Clarke transformation requires 12 words of ROM, 6 words of RAM and 0.24 MIPS.
5.2.2 Park Transformation Code
The following is the code developed for the Park transformation. ********************************************* * * * * Park Transformation (Ialpha,Ibeta) > (Id,Iq) isd=isalpha*cos(beta)+isbeta*sin(beta) isq=isalpha*sin(beta)+isbeta*cos(beta)
********************************************* lt mpy lta mpy isbeta sinbeta isalpha cosbeta
mpya sinbeta sach lacc lt isd,4 #0 isbeta
mpys cosbeta apac sach isq,4
********************************************* * End Park Transformation
********************************************* The Park transformation requires 12 words of ROM, 6 words of RAM and 0.24 MIPS.
 74 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
5.2.3 PI Regulator Code
The Proportional Integral (PI) regulators are implemented with output saturation and with integral component correction. An electrical drive based on the Field Oriented Control needs two constant as reference components, namely the flux and torque components. The classic PI regulator is well suited to regulating the torque and flux feedback to the desired values as it is able to reach constant references, by correctly setting both the P term (Kpi) and the I term (Ki) which are respectively responsible for error sensibility and for the steady state error. The numerical expression of the PI regulator is as follows:
U k = K pi ek + K i ek + ∑ en
n =0
k −1
which can also be represented as a closed loop system as shown in figure5.2.3.1 below.
Figure 5.2.3.1: Classical PI Regulator
The limiting point of this regulator, however, is that during normal operation, or testing, large reference value variations or large disturbances may occur, resulting in saturation and overflow of the regulator variables and output. If they are not
 75 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
controlled, this kind of nonlinearity damages the dynamic performance of the system. A solution to this problem is to add to the previous model a correction of the integral component as depicted in figure 5.2.3.2.
Figure 5.2.3.2: Numerical PI Regulator with Integral Correction
The algorithm for this regulator can be depicted as follows: INPUT yrefk, yfbk ek = yrefk  yfbk uk = xi + Kpiek ulk = uk IF uk>umax THEN ulk = umax IF uk<umin THEN ulk = umin OUTPUT ulk Elk = ukulk xi = xi+Kiek+Kcorelk
 76 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Therefore the implementation code developed for the speed PI regulator is shown below. It is important to also note that the speed and torque regulators are essentially the same and as such only the speed regulator is shown in the following.
***************************************************** * Speed regulator with integral component correction *****************************************************
lacc
n_ref
sub sacl lacc lt mpy
apac
n epin xin, 12 epin Kpin ;epin=n_refn, 4.12 format
sach
upi, 4
;upi=xin+epin*Kpin, 4.12 format
bit bcnd lacc sub bcnd lacc b
upi,0 upimagzeros,NTC #Isqrefmin upi neg_sat,GT upi limiters ;if upi<ISqrefmin branch to saturate ;If value >0 we branch ;negative saturation
neg_sat
lacc b
#Isqrefmin limiters
;set acc to ve saturated value
upimagzeros
 77 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
lacc sub
#Isqrefmax upi
;positive saturation
bcnd lacc b
pos_sat, LT upi limiters
;if upi>ISqrefmax branch to saturate
pos_sat lacc #Isqrefmax
limiters sac1 sub iSqref upi
sacl
elpi
;elpi=iSqrefupi
It Mpy pac lt mpy apac add sach
elpi Kcorn
epin Kin
xin, 12 xin, 4 ;xin=xin+epin*Kin+elpi*Kcorn
*********************************************************** * END Speed regulator with integral component correction ***********************************************************
 78 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
5.3 Five Level PWM Inverter
The five level inverter has been successfully implemented as per the design criteria. One phase of the inverter was implemented and tested and produced the desired voltage and current waveforms. Figure 5.3.1, shown below, displays the full system with all PCB’s.
Figure 5.3.1: Complete Inverter System Diagram
The above figure clearly shows the three phases of the inverter with the IGBT’s connected to the heat sinks. The board in the middle is the power supply board to
 79 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
each of the phases. The other three boards are the control boards for each phase and that is where the synthesising of each of control signals is undertaken before the final gate control signal is sent to each of the power boards and in turn to each IGBT. The output signals are fed to each phase of the induction motor. Figure 5.3.2, shown below, displays the gate control signals associated with one phase of the inverter. The gate control signal is for level 2 at the top of the sinusoidal waveform.
Figure 5.3.2: Inverter Gate Control Signal
 80 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The field oriented control of induction motors is of high performance. It requires a lot of real time calculations and power electronic devices to implement, its control is based on the development of microprocessors and power electronic techniques. Presently fast processors and high current power electronic devices, such as MOSFET's and IGBT's, possess not only high power rating but also high switching frequency. All of this makes the application of field oriented control for industry a more viable solution when precise controllability is required.
6.1 Conclusions
In this project field oriented control was implemented using the software package Power System Computer Aided Design (PSCAD). Software implementation of field oriented control is under process and will be of future consideration. Code has been generated for the majority of routines required for the implementation on the TMS320C40 digital signal processor.
 81 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Estimation of the rotor flux angle has been achieved by the use of a linear model. PI regulators were also used as the main controllers. PI regulators have been used due to their relative simplicity and they require less time to produce the control actions. Transient state factors of the induction motor has been ignored to simplify design, but it may cause some data errors.
The five level inverter was designed and appropriate switching techniques were discussed. PSCAD software was used to verify design and once that was completed implementation was under way. The five level PWM inverter was implemented using eight printed circuit boards (PCB). One phase of the inverter was fully functional and tests were performed on the output voltage and current waveforms. The other two phases will follow suit and can further be tested to ensure appropriate voltage and current waveforms are generated.
Integration between the inverter logic and the TMS320C40 digital signal processor field oriented control logic was not completed and that will be the subject of future studies. However it was established that three outputs from the vector control, namely magnitude frequency and phase, will result in the inverter adjusting its outputs to suit these requirements.
6.2 Future Recommendations
 82 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
Although a substantial work has been done on the project so far a lot of further improvement and study is also required. One of the main areas of future work will be to ensure that the remaining two phases of the inverter are operating properly. The next step will be to connect the inverter to the induction motor at a constant speed and frequency and ensure that it drives the induction motor.
Further development of the code for field oriented control is required so that the implementation for use on the TMS320C40 digital signal processor. This in particular will concentrate on developing code for the reference values of speed and torque. Development of the current sensing board and the interface to the DSP will be required to be at more carefully to ensure that the correct values are sensed and sent to the DSP.
Further development can concentrate on feedback control from the load. This will in a sense make this a standalone system that will be able to vary its output due to changes in the load and load behaviour. Development of sensing mechanisms from the load will be required along with interface to the DSP.
Development of this system so that it can be used for use in an electric car is one of the possibilities for future work.
 83 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
CHAPTER 7
REFERENCES
[1]
Shepherd, W & Hulley, L.N. & Liang D.T.W. 1995, Power Electronics and
Motor Control, Cambridge Press, Melbourne.
[2]
Nasar S.A. & Boldea I. 1992, Electric Machines Dynamics and Control, CRC Press, USA.
[3]
Mohan N., Undeland T. & Robbins W.P. 1995, Power Electronics,
Converters, Applications and Design, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
[4]
Fitzgerald A., Kingsley C. Jr & Umans S.D. 1992, Electric Machinery, McGrawHill, Britain.
[5]
Wade S., Dunnigan M. & Williams B. 1994, 'Simulation of Induction
Machine Vector Control and Parameter Identification', Power Electronics
and Variable Speed Drives, October, no. 399, pp. 4247.
 84 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
[6]
Keerthipala
W.,
Chun
M.
&
Duggal
B.
1997,
‘Microprocessor
implementation of fieldoriented control of induction motor using ANN Observers’, Journal of Microprocessors and Microsystems, April 1997, no.
21, pp. 105112.
[7]
Nash J. N. 1996, ‘Direct Torque Control Induction Motor Vector Control
Without an Encoder’, IEEE Conference, May 1993, pp. 8693.
[8]
Lander C. W. 1993, Power Electronics 3rd Edition, USA.
[9]
www.microchip.com
[10]
www.analog.com/publications/press/products/ADMC330_100896.html
[11]
www.allegromicro.com/prod/sum/2917.htm
[12]
www.rowan.it/inglese/vettgb.htm
[13]
www.intercast.com/design/mcs96/datashts/272543.htm
[14]
www.best.com/~workline/g/23/273g.htm
[15]
ecewww.colorado.edu/~ecen4517/course_material/project/induction.html
 85 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
[16]
www.iet.auc.dlk/danprot/cour_ka2.htm
[17]
Hughes A. 1990, Electric Motors and Drives, Reed International Books, Britain.
[18]
Koziol R, Sawicki J & Szklarski L. 1992, Digital Control of Electric Drives, Polish Scientific Publishers, USA.
[19]
Dubey G.K. 1995, Fundamentals of Electrical Drives, Narosa Publishing House, India.
[20]
Smeaton R.W. 1987, Motor Applications & Maintenance Handbook, McGrawHill Book Company, USA.
[21]
Kenjo T. 1994, Power Electronics for the Microprocessor Age, Oxford University Press, Tokyo.
[22]
Yamayee Z. & Bala J. 1994, Electromechanical Energy Devices and Power
Systems, John Wiley and Sons Inc. USA.
[23]
www.ti.com
[24]
Bose B.K. 1986, Introduction to Microcomputer Control in Microcomputer Control of Power Electronics and Drives, IEEE Press USA.
 86 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
[25]
Bose B.K. 1982, Adjustable Speed AC Drives – A Technology Status Review in Microcomputer Control of Power Electronics and Drives, IEEE Press USA.
[26]
Gabriel R. & Leonard S.M. 1982, Microprocessor Control of Induction
Motor – A Technology Status Review in Microcomputer Control of Power
Electronics and Drives, IEEE Press USA.
[27]
Hu J. Duggal B.R. & Vilathgamuwa, ‘Sensorless Field Oriented Control of
Induction Motor’, IEEE Conference, pp. 607611.
[28]
Benchaib A. Rachid A. & Audrezet E. 1999, ‘Sliding Mode InputOutput
Linearization and Field Orientation for RealTime Control of Induction Motors’. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol.14 No.1, pp. 313.
[29]
Hava A. Kerkman Russel & Lipo T. 1999, ‘Simple Analytical and Graphical
Methods for Carrier Based PWMVSI Drives’. IEEE Transactions on Power
Electronics, Vol.14 No.1, pp. 4961.
[30]
Robyns B. Sente P. Buyse H. & Labrique F. 1999, ‘Influence of Digital Current Control Strategy on the Sensitivity to Electrical Parameter Uncertainties of Induction Motor Indirect Field Orientated Control’. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol.14 No.4, pp. 690699.
 87 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.0 APPENDICES
Appendix A – Five Level PWM Inverter Circuit Using PSCAD
Appendix B – Five Level PWM Inverter Output Graphs using PSCAD
Appendix C – Induction Motor Simulation Circuits using PSCAD
Appendix D – Induction Motor Simulation Output Graphs Using PSCAD
Appendix E – Texas Instruments TMS320C40 Datasheets
Appendix F – Field Oriented Control Simulation Using PSCAD
Appendix G  Field Oriented Control Simulation Output Graphs Using PSCAD.
Appendix H – HCPL788J Optocoupler Datasheet.
Appendix I – ADS7816 Analogue to Digital Converter Datasheet.
Appendix J – Optocoupler PCB and Circuits.
Appendix K – Power Supply Board and Circuit.
 88 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 89 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.1 Appendix A – Five Level PWM Inverter Circuit
 90 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 91 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 92 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 93 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 94 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 95 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.2 Appendix B – Five Level PWM Inverter Output Graphs
 96 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 97 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 98 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 99 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.3 Appendix C – Induction Motor Simulation Circuits
 100 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 101 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.4 Appendix D – Induction Motor Simulation Circuits Output Graphs
 102 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 103 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 104 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.5 Appendix E – Texas Instruments TMS320C40 Datasheet
 105 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 106 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 107 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 108 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 109 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 110 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 111 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 112 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 113 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 114 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 115 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 116 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 117 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 118 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 119 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 120 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 121 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 122 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 123 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 124 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 125 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 126 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 127 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 128 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 129 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 130 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 131 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 132 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 133 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 134 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.6 Appendix F – Field Oriented Control Simulation
 135 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 136 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 137 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 138 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.7 Appendix G – Field Oriented Control Simulation Output Graphs
 139 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 140 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 141 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 142 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 143 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.8 Appendix H  HCPL 788J Datasheet
 144 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 145 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 146 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 147 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 148 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 149 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 150 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 151 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 152 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 153 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 154 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 155 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 156 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 157 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 158 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 159 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 160 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 161 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 162 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 163 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 164 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.9 Appendix I – ADS 7816 Analogue to Digital Converter Datasheet
 165 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 166 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 167 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 168 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 169 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 170 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 171 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 172 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 173 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 174 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 175 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 176 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 177 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 178 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.9 Appendix J – Optocoupler PCB and Circuit
 179 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 180 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 181 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 182 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 183 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
8.10 Appendix K – Power Supply Board and Circuit
 184 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 185 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 186 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 187 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
 188 
FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF A MULTILEVEL PWM INVERTER FED INDUCTION MOTOR
9.0 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
“Field Oriented Control for a Multilevel PWM Inverter Fed Induction Motor”
Submitted for IEEE Student Prize, IEAust Student paper and the PowerCon 2000 conference.
 189 
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?