Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Insight Report
Contents
Contributors
Preface
vii
by Attilio Di Battista, Sean Doherty, Margareta Drzeniek Hanouz and Thierry Geiger
(World Economic Forum)
27
45
Index of Countries/Economies
49
Country/Economy Profiles
50
329
331
337
Acknowledgments
339
Contributors
DATA PROVIDERS
The World Economic Forum would like to thank the following
experts and their respective organizations for providing
privileged access to their data and for their guidance, without
which the production of this Report would not have been
possible:
Preface
ESPEN BARTH EIDE
CHAPTER 1
Box 1: The Bali Package and Potential Gains from Trade Facilitation
GLOBAL AGENDA COUNCIL ON TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT1
Country/Region
GDP gains*
Percent
US$ billions
Export gains
Percent
US$ billions
1.29
8.00
Brazil
0.37
4.38
8
7
Canada
1.41
22
5.00
20
China
1.45
124
8.83
187
Egypt
2.24
8.83
European Union
2.04
348
10.60
629
India
0.91
21
9.56
35
Japan
0.12
2.10
15
Korea, Rep.
2.18
29
8.18
52
Mexico
2.47
33
11.79
49
Middle East
5.66
30
13.66
22
North Africa
4.44
15
11.21
14
Other Africa
7.28
47
22.28
46
Other Asia
7.97
283
16.18
211
3.75
36
15.04
49
3.07
40
16.20
40
Russian Federation
2.83
35
7.88
25
South Africa
3.36
13
17.93
16
United States
0.55
90
3.90
61
Total
1.78
1,177
8.23
1,488
References
Four, J., A. Bnassy-Qur and L. Fontagn. 2010. The World
Economy in 2050: A Tentative Picture. CEPII Working paper 201027. Paris: CEPII.
Hufbauer, G., Clyde and J. J. Schott. 2013. Payoff from the World
Trade Agenda. Peter G. Peterson Institute for International
Economics. Washington, DC.
World Bank. 2013. World Development Indicators database.
Washington, DC.
World Economic Forum. 2013. Enabling Trade Valuing Growth
Opportunities. Geneva.
Zaki, C. An empirical assessment of the trade facilitation initiative:
econometric evidence and global economic effects. In World
Trade Review, 2014, 13: 103130.
Subindex A.
Market access
Pillar 2.
Foreign
market access
Pillar 1.
Domestic
market access
Exports
Subindex B.
Border
administration
Pillar 3.
Efficiency and
transparency
of border
administration
Imports
Subindex C.
Infrastructure
Pillar 4.
Availability
and quality
of transport
infrastructure
Pillar 5.
Availability
and quality
of transport
services
Subindex D.
Operating environment
Pillar 6.
Availability
and use
of ICTs
Imports
Exports
FOREIGN MARKET
DOMESTIC MARKET
Country Coverage
For the 2014 edition, coverage increased from 132 to
138 economies, which together account for 98.8% of
world GDP and 98.3% of world merchandise trade.4
Bhutan, Gabon, Guinea, Lao PDR, Liberia, Libya, Malta
and Myanmar are covered for the first time, while we
had to exclude Syria and Tajikistan, two countries where
References
Arvis J.F. and B. Shepherd. 2011. The Air Connectivity Index.
Measuring integration into the Global Air Transport Network. World
Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 5722. Washington
DC: The World Bank.
Borchert, I., B. Gootiiz and A, Mattoo. 2012. Policy Barriers to
International Trade in Services. Evidence from a New Database.
World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 6109.
Washington DC: The World Bank.
Kunaka, C. V. Tanase, P. Latrille, and P. Krausz. 2013. Quantitative
Analysis of Road Transport Agreements (QuARTA). Washington DC:
The World Bank.
Figure2: GDP per capita and the Enabling Trade Index 2014
Singapore
5
Kuwait
4
Algeria
Gabon
Mongolia
Russian Federation
Lybia
Venezuela
Angola
1
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
Figure3: The Enabling Trade Index 2014: Regional averages and best performers
Developing Asia
Latin America and the Caribbean
Middle East, North Africa, and Pakistan
Sub-Saharan Africa
1
ENABLING
TRADE INDEX
2014
1. Domestic
market
access
2. Foreign
market
access
3. Efficiency
and transparency
of border
administration
4. Availability
and quality
of transport
infrastructure
5. Availability
and quality
of transport
services
6. Availability
and use of
ICTs
7. Operating
environment
6. Availability
and use of
ICTs
7. Operating
environment
PILLARS
Figure4: The Enabling Trade Index 2014: Income group averages and best performers
Low-income
Lower-middle income
Upper-middle income
1
ENABLING
TRADE INDEX
2014
1. Domestic
market
access
2. Foreign
market
access
3. Efficiency
and transparency
of border
administration
4. Availability
and quality
of transport
infrastructure
5. Availability
and quality
of transport
services
PILLARS
Country / Economy
Singapore
Hong Kong SAR
Netherlands
New Zealand
Finland
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Chile
Sweden
Germany
Luxembourg
Norway
Japan
Canada
United States
United Arab Emirates
Denmark
Austria
Qatar
Belgium
France
Iceland
Australia
Taiwan, China
Malaysia
Ireland
Spain
Estonia
Mauritius
Korea, Rep.
Oman
Israel
Bahrain
Malta
Portugal
Georgia
Cyprus
Slovenia
Czech Republic
Jordan
Latvia
Costa Rica
Morocco
Lithuania
Poland
Turkey
Italy
Saudi Arabia
Montenegro
Hungary
Peru
Panama
Armenia
China
Slovak Republic
Croatia
Thailand
Indonesia
South Africa
Uruguay
Mexico
Guatemala
Macedonia, FYR
Philippines
Ecuador
Rwanda
Greece
Nicaragua
Albania
Rank
Score (17)
Region*
Income
Country / Economy
Rank
Score (17)
Region*
Income
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
5.9
5.5
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
SA
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
MENAP
ADV
ADV
MENAP
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
ADV
DA
ADV
ADV
ADV
SSA
ADV
MENAP
ADV
MENAP
ADV
ADV
CIS
ADV
ADV
ADV
MENAP
CEE
CAC
MENAP
CEE
CEE
CEE
ADV
MENAP
CEE
CEE
SA
CAC
CIS
DA
ADV
CEE
DA
DA
SSA
SA
CAC
CAC
CEE
DA
SA
SSA
ADV
CAC
CEE
HIC
HIC
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC
UMC
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
UMC
HIC-OECD
HIC
HIC-OECD
HIC
HIC
HIC-OECD
LMC
HIC
HIC-OECD
HIC-OECD
UMC
HIC
UMC
LMC
HIC
HIC-OECD
UMC
HIC-OECD
HIC
UMC
UMC
UMC
UMC
LMC
UMC
HIC-OECD
HIC
UMC
LMC
UMC
HIC
UMC
LMC
UMC
LMC
UMC
LIC
HIC-OECD
LMC
UMC
Bulgaria
El Salvador
Vietnam
Colombia
Kuwait
Romania
Tunisia
Azerbaijan
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Dominican Republic
Jamaica
Namibia
Lebanon
Ukraine
Sri Lanka
Honduras
Brazil
Bolivia
Botswana
Serbia
Kenya
Zambia
Moldova
Cambodia
Kazakhstan
Argentina
India
Egypt
Lao PDR
Gambia, The
Senegal
Uganda
Ghana
Madagascar
Guyana
Russian Federation
Libya
Bhutan
Lesotho
Kyrgyz Republic
Mozambique
Tanzania
Malawi
Paraguay
Pakistan
Bangladesh
Nepal
Cte dIvoire
Ethiopia
Cameroon
Algeria
Myanmar
Gabon
Mali
Nigeria
Haiti
Liberia
Benin
Yemen
Mauritania
Mongolia
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Burundi
Burkina Faso
Zimbabwe
Guinea
Angola
Venezuela
Chad
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.5
CEE
CAC
DA
SA
MENAP
CEE
MENAP
CIS
CEE
CAC
CAC
SSA
MENAP
CIS
DA
CAC
SA
SA
SSA
CEE
SSA
SSA
CIS
DA
CIS
SA
DA
MENAP
DA
SSA
SSA
SSA
SSA
SSA
SA
CIS
MENAP
DA
SSA
CIS
SSA
SSA
SSA
SA
MENAP
DA
DA
SSA
SSA
SSA
MENAP
DA
SSA
SSA
SSA
CAC
SSA
SSA
MENAP
MENAP
DA
MENAP
SSA
SSA
SSA
SSA
SSA
SA
SSA
UMC
LMC
LMC
UMC
HIC
UMC
UMC
UMC
UMC
UMC
UMC
UMC
UMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
UMC
LMC
UMC
UMC
LIC
LMC
LMC
LIC
UMC
UMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LIC
LMC
LIC
LMC
LIC
LMC
HIC
UMC
LMC
LMC
LIC
LIC
LIC
LIC
LMC
LMC
LIC
LIC
LMC
LIC
LMC
UMC
LIC
UMC
LIC
LMC
LIC
LIC
LIC
LMC
LMC
LMC
UMC
LIC
LIC
LIC
LIC
UMC
UMC
LIC
* Region (adapted from IMF classification): ADV = Advanced economies; CAC = Central America and the Caribbean; CEE = Central and Eastern Europe; CIS = Commonwealth of Independent
States; DA = Developing Asia; MENAP = Middle East, North Africa, and Pakistan; SA = South America; and SSA = Sub-Saharan Africa.
Income group (World Bank classification): HIC-OECD = High income OECD; HIC = Other high income; UMC = Upper-middle income; LMC = Lower-middle income; and LIC = Low income.
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Country/Economy
Chile
Singapore
Mauritius
Peru
Libya
El Salvador
Nicaragua
Costa Rica
Armenia
Honduras
Philippines
Guatemala
Georgia
Uganda
Malawi
Colombia
Albania
Mexico
Rwanda
Indonesia
Iceland
New Zealand
Zambia
Madagascar
Myanmar
Bolivia
Moldova
Macedonia, FYR
Mozambique
Ecuador
Tanzania
Kyrgyz Republic
Montenegro
Vietnam
Uruguay
Cambodia
Hong Kong SAR
Ukraine
Lao PDR
Malaysia
Canada
Kenya
Jordan
Burundi
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Namibia
Lesotho
Haiti
Israel
Croatia
Thailand
Tunisia
Morocco
Oman
Argentina
Norway
Bangladesh
Jamaica
Qatar
Lebanon
Nepal
Turkey
Botswana
Paraguay
Yemen
Azerbaijan
Dominican Republic
Guyana
South Africa
Rank
Country/Economy
Score
(17)
5.5
5.5
5.3
5.0
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
70
71
72
73
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
United States
Switzerland
Bahrain
Panama
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Bhutan
Egypt
Sri Lanka
Saudi Arabia
Mauritania
Angola
Kazakhstan
United Arab Emirates
Brazil
Japan
Serbia
Kuwait
Ethiopia
Senegal
Mali
Cameroon
Burkina Faso
China
Korea, Rep.
Taiwan, China
Ghana
Chad
Benin
Cte dIvoire
Mongolia
Venezuela
Algeria
Gambia, The
Zimbabwe
Guinea
Russian Federation
Pakistan
Gabon
Nigeria
India
Liberia
Iran, Islamic Rep.
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.2
1.9
Rank
1
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
Country/Economy
Score
(17)
Rank
Country/Economy
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.1
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.6
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
46
46
46
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Uganda
United Arab Emirates
Malaysia
Vietnam
Bahrain
Dominican Republic
Yemen
Saudi Arabia
Burundi
Kyrgyz Republic
Bolivia
Kenya
Switzerland
Panama
Tanzania
Kuwait
Mozambique
Argentina
Madagascar
Mongolia
Jamaica
Sri Lanka
Azerbaijan
Jordan
Myanmar
China
Tunisia
Morocco
Lebanon
Lesotho
Haiti
Korea, Rep.
Mali
Ghana
Serbia
Brazil
Bhutan
Burkina Faso
Guyana
Kazakhstan
Thailand
Senegal
Cte dIvoire
Angola
Benin
Mauritania
Guinea
Venezuela
Lao PDR
Nigeria
Algeria
Ethiopia
Cameroon
Bangladesh
Russian Federation
Egypt
Liberia
Gambia, The
Pakistan
Gabon
Cambodia
Chad
India
Nepal
Zimbabwe
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Score
(17)
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.4
2.4
(Contd.)
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Country/Economy
Cambodia
Chile
Nepal
Lao PDR
Mauritius
Myanmar
Bangladesh
Madagascar
Peru
Uganda
Malawi
Thailand
Singapore
Mozambique
Bolivia
Costa Rica
Tanzania
Colombia
Kyrgyz Republic
Rwanda
El Salvador
Haiti
Lesotho
Jordan
Zambia
Philippines
Honduras
Vietnam
Mexico
Nicaragua
Tunisia
Morocco
Moldova
Armenia
Lebanon
Ecuador
Indonesia
Kenya
Egypt
Guyana
Uruguay
Malaysia
Burundi
Argentina
Jamaica
Iceland
Guatemala
Zimbabwe
Georgia
Macedonia, FYR
Chad
Mauritania
Albania
Ethiopia
Angola
Azerbaijan
Bhutan
Cameroon
Kazakhstan
Montenegro
Ukraine
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Norway
Senegal
New Zealand
Libya
Yemen
Croatia
Namibia
Score
(17)
Rank
Country/Economy
5.3
5.1
4.7
4.7
4.5
4.4
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.5
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Dominican Republic
Switzerland
Oman
Israel
Benin
Gambia, The
Canada
Brazil
Panama
Serbia
Turkey
Burkina Faso
Algeria
Cte dIvoire
Russian Federation
Sri Lanka
Venezuela
Bahrain
Paraguay
Pakistan
Mali
South Africa
Guinea
Korea, Rep.
India
Ghana
Gabon
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Botswana
China
Kuwait
Saudi Arabia
United States
Qatar
United Arab Emirates
Nigeria
Mongolia
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Australia
Hong Kong SAR
Liberia
Taiwan, China
Japan
Score
(17)
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Country/Economy
Singapore
Finland
Sweden
Netherlands
Japan
New Zealand
United Kingdom
Estonia
Denmark
Austria
Hong Kong SAR
Switzerland
Germany
Ireland
Luxembourg
Norway
United Arab Emirates
Taiwan, China
Korea, Rep.
Canada
United States
Australia
Belgium
Iceland
Spain
Chile
France
Slovenia
Israel
Latvia
Poland
Malta
Malaysia
Lithuania
Georgia
Qatar
Czech Republic
Hungary
Jordan
Oman
Bahrain
Cyprus
Portugal
Turkey
Morocco
Costa Rica
Italy
China
South Africa
Slovak Republic
Peru
Saudi Arabia
Mauritius
Montenegro
Panama
Thailand
Bulgaria
Romania
Greece
Nicaragua
Guatemala
Mexico
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Croatia
Kuwait
Uruguay
Colombia
Indonesia
Score
(17)
Rank
Country/Economy
6.3
5.5
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Albania
Philippines
Pakistan
Armenia
India
Senegal
Jamaica
Lebanon
Serbia
Tunisia
Brazil
Gambia, The
Honduras
Ghana
El Salvador
Macedonia, FYR
Vietnam
Sri Lanka
Guyana
Rwanda
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Madagascar
Namibia
Bolivia
Azerbaijan
Liberia
Argentina
Nigeria
Algeria
Gabon
Ukraine
Kenya
Bhutan
Russian Federation
Lesotho
Mozambique
Cte dIvoire
Botswana
Cambodia
Egypt
Ethiopia
Tanzania
Benin
Libya
Lao PDR
Uganda
Moldova
Myanmar
Kyrgyz Republic
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Paraguay
Cameroon
Guinea
Bangladesh
Yemen
Nepal
Haiti
Kazakhstan
Mauritania
Zambia
Malawi
Angola
Mali
Venezuela
Zimbabwe
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Mongolia
Chad
Score
(17)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.5
* Since this subindex is made up of only one pillar, data for this subindex and pillar 3 are
identical.
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Country/Economy
Singapore
Hong Kong SAR
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Japan
Germany
Korea, Rep.
United States
France
United Arab Emirates
Switzerland
Spain
Luxembourg
Finland
Taiwan, China
Denmark
Sweden
Belgium
Austria
Australia
Norway
Canada
Malaysia
Qatar
New Zealand
Portugal
Ireland
Czech Republic
Bahrain
Iceland
Malta
Italy
Israel
Estonia
Slovenia
China
Saudi Arabia
Oman
Lithuania
Slovak Republic
Latvia
Croatia
Hungary
Chile
Panama
Thailand
Turkey
Cyprus
Poland
Morocco
Greece
Russian Federation
Kazakhstan
South Africa
Bulgaria
Mauritius
Kuwait
Egypt
Jordan
Vietnam
Ukraine
Azerbaijan
Mexico
Indonesia
Montenegro
Brazil
India
Romania
Serbia
Rank
Country/Economy
Score
(17)
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.6
5.6
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.4
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.1
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
El Salvador
Georgia
Dominican Republic
Armenia
Lebanon
Jamaica
Argentina
Tunisia
Guatemala
Uruguay
Macedonia, FYR
Ecuador
Namibia
Sri Lanka
Colombia
Costa Rica
Botswana
Moldova
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Philippines
Albania
Peru
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Kenya
Pakistan
Ghana
Rwanda
Paraguay
Mali
Gambia, The
Venezuela
Cambodia
Senegal
Mongolia
Kyrgyz Republic
Bolivia
Honduras
Zimbabwe
Cte dIvoire
Bhutan
Nigeria
Nicaragua
Algeria
Zambia
Guyana
Lao PDR
Ethiopia
Lesotho
Libya
Bangladesh
Uganda
Malawi
Burkina Faso
Nepal
Gabon
Cameroon
Benin
Tanzania
Mauritania
Madagascar
Liberia
Yemen
Mozambique
Burundi
Angola
Haiti
Myanmar
Guinea
Chad
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Country/Economy
Score
(17)
Rank
Country/Economy
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.3
6.3
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.7
5.7
5.4
5.3
5.2
5.1
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Tunisia
Bulgaria
Guatemala
Latvia
Vietnam
El Salvador
Poland
Rwanda
Estonia
Botswana
Ecuador
Montenegro
Macedonia, FYR
Gambia, The
Mali
Kenya
Moldova
Zimbabwe
Senegal
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bhutan
Lao PDR
Algeria
Ethiopia
Ghana
Argentina
Philippines
Lesotho
Zambia
Romania
Malawi
Peru
Brazil
Serbia
Honduras
Kyrgyz Republic
Cte dIvoire
Uruguay
Nicaragua
Libya
Bolivia
Paraguay
Colombia
Cambodia
Cameroon
Uganda
Albania
Costa Rica
Guyana
Nigeria
Bangladesh
Nepal
Burundi
Burkina Faso
Madagascar
Mongolia
Mozambique
Venezuela
Tanzania
Gabon
Mauritania
Yemen
Liberia
Benin
Angola
Haiti
Chad
Guinea
Myanmar
Score
(17)
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.8
(Contd.)
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Country/Economy
Singapore
Netherlands
Germany
Japan
Hong Kong SAR
Belgium
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Luxembourg
United States
Taiwan, China
Canada
Norway
France
Spain
Finland
Korea, Rep.
Ireland
Australia
Denmark
Qatar
Austria
Portugal
New Zealand
Malaysia
United Arab Emirates
Iceland
Czech Republic
Slovenia
China
Latvia
Israel
Italy
Hungary
Turkey
Estonia
Poland
Thailand
Malta
Slovak Republic
Lithuania
Chile
Saudi Arabia
Cyprus
Bahrain
Romania
Croatia
South Africa
Vietnam
Bulgaria
Panama
Morocco
Greece
Serbia
Oman
India
Indonesia
Mexico
Brazil
Ukraine
Jordan
El Salvador
Kenya
Kazakhstan
Montenegro
Mauritius
Namibia
Rwanda
Score
(17)
Rank
Country/Economy
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.5
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.1
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Guatemala
Ecuador
Egypt
Argentina
Albania
Kuwait
Armenia
Peru
Pakistan
Sri Lanka
Tunisia
Jamaica
Russian Federation
Costa Rica
Philippines
Dominican Republic
Ethiopia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Colombia
Uruguay
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Moldova
Nigeria
Uganda
Malawi
Lebanon
Nicaragua
Cambodia
Cte dIvoire
Georgia
Macedonia, FYR
Azerbaijan
Ghana
Bangladesh
Senegal
Burkina Faso
Botswana
Lao PDR
Paraguay
Guyana
Gambia, The
Mali
Bhutan
Zambia
Bolivia
Algeria
Nepal
Liberia
Honduras
Burundi
Lesotho
Venezuela
Benin
Madagascar
Yemen
Cameroon
Zimbabwe
Tanzania
Kyrgyz Republic
Mongolia
Chad
Guinea
Mozambique
Myanmar
Angola
Gabon
Mauritania
Libya
Haiti
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.7
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Country/Economy
Sweden
United Kingdom
Finland
Netherlands
Denmark
Korea, Rep.
Norway
Singapore
Luxembourg
Japan
Hong Kong SAR
Estonia
United States
Switzerland
Australia
New Zealand
Bahrain
Austria
Taiwan, China
Iceland
Germany
France
United Arab Emirates
Israel
Qatar
Belgium
Malta
Canada
Spain
Lithuania
Czech Republic
Latvia
Ireland
Hungary
Slovenia
Chile
Portugal
Malaysia
Croatia
Saudi Arabia
Poland
Kazakhstan
Slovak Republic
Russian Federation
Italy
Greece
Oman
Brazil
Bulgaria
Uruguay
Kuwait
Montenegro
Cyprus
Serbia
Argentina
Colombia
Panama
Macedonia, FYR
Romania
Egypt
Azerbaijan
Costa Rica
South Africa
Vietnam
Morocco
Mauritius
Jordan
Georgia
El Salvador
Score
(17)
Rank
Country/Economy
6.5
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.2
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Ukraine
Thailand
Armenia
Mexico
Albania
Turkey
Tunisia
Moldova
Mongolia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ecuador
Indonesia
China
Dominican Republic
Botswana
Philippines
Guatemala
Venezuela
Lebanon
Peru
Kyrgyz Republic
Jamaica
Paraguay
Ghana
Bolivia
Cambodia
Namibia
Sri Lanka
Honduras
Kenya
Libya
Zimbabwe
Gabon
Iran, Islamic Rep.
India
Senegal
Mali
Nigeria
Guyana
Gambia, The
Cte dIvoire
Nicaragua
Bhutan
Mauritania
Zambia
Algeria
Pakistan
Benin
Bangladesh
Lesotho
Nepal
Cameroon
Lao PDR
Tanzania
Rwanda
Burkina Faso
Yemen
Uganda
Mozambique
Angola
Madagascar
Ethiopia
Liberia
Haiti
Malawi
Myanmar
Guinea
Burundi
Chad
Score
(17)
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Country/Economy
Score
(17)
Rank
Country/Economy
Score
(17)
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.6
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Namibia
Ghana
Bhutan
India
Cambodia
Thailand
Tunisia
Senegal
Liberia
Greece
Peru
Vietnam
Philippines
Bulgaria
Romania
Albania
Nicaragua
Cameroon
Ecuador
Kenya
Brazil
Guyana
Jamaica
Paraguay
Guatemala
Uganda
Bolivia
Mexico
Lesotho
Bangladesh
Moldova
Tanzania
Lebanon
Ukraine
Serbia
Mongolia
Egypt
Gabon
Malawi
Mozambique
Dominican Republic
Cte dIvoire
Colombia
Nepal
El Salvador
Ethiopia
Pakistan
Madagascar
Mali
Russian Federation
Honduras
Kyrgyz Republic
Burkina Faso
Benin
Argentina
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Zimbabwe
Mauritania
Nigeria
Guinea
Algeria
Haiti
Libya
Burundi
Myanmar
Angola
Yemen
Chad
Venezuela
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.1
3.1
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.6
* Since this subindex is made up of only one pillar, data for this subindex and pillar 7 are
identical.
Table 1: Border administration: performance gap between selected groups and best performers in pillar components
PILLAR 3:
BORDER
ADMINISTRATION
Customs services
index
Efficiency of the
clearance process
No. of days
to import
No. of documents
to import
Cost to import
No. of days
to export
No. of documents
to export
Cost to export
Irregular payments
in exports and
imports
Time predictability
of import
procedures
Customs
transparency index
Scores correspond to the ratio of group average values to best performing economys values
High-income: OECD
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.6
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.8
Upper-middle income
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.8
Lower-middle income
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.4
0.9
0.8
0.4
0.9
0.3
0.4
0.7
Low income
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.5
Advanced Economies
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.6
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.8
MENAP
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.8
0.5
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.8
Developing Asia
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.4
0.9
0.8
0.4
0.9
0.3
0.4
0.6
CIS
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.8
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.3
0.4
0.6
EU 28
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.9
GGC
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.8
ASEAN
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.9
0.2
0.5
0.5
SACU
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
1.0
SAFTA
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.9
0.7
0.3
0.9
0.2
0.4
0.7
MERCOSUR
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.4
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.7
Malaysia
New
Zealand
Finland
Multiple
SELECTED AGREEMENTS
REGION
INCOME GROUP
Group
Best Performer
Singapore
Singapore
Norway
Singapore
Multiple
Singapore
Multiple
Multiple
Advanced
Economies
Latin America
and the Caribbean
Singapore (1)
Middle East,
North Africa,
and Pakistan
Developing
Asia
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Commonwealth of
Independent States
Central and
Eastern Europe
Chile (8)
UAE (16)
20.5
Malaysia (25)
Mauritius (29)
Georgia (36)
Latvia (41)
56
Greece (67)
73
76
87.5
93
Highest-ranked
Median rank
Lowest-ranked
111.5
Venezuela (137)
Iran (131)
Mongolia (130)
Serbia (89)
Chad (138)
Country Highlights
As a complement to the rankings tables, Table6 reports
the 10 best-performing economies on the overall
Enabling Trade Index and the seven pillars, illustrating
the quality and consistency of their performance across
the index. The table also lists the top 5 by pillar. Below,
we describe the performance of selected countries listed
by region and by rank.8
Asia and the Pacific
For the fourth consecutive edition, Singapore ranks
1st in the ETI. The level and consistency of Singapores
performance is outstanding. As shown in Table6,
Singapore leads in two pillars (border administration
and transport services), features in the top 5 of three
more and ranks 8th and 13th in the remaining two. As
a result, the score differential with second-ranked Hong
Kong SAR is 0.5 points, which is considerable by ETI
standards. One of the worlds leading trading platforms,
the total value of merchandise exported to and imported
from Singapore represented 2.9 times its GDP in 2012.
A champion of government efficiency, Singapores
excellent performance in terms of border administration
is reflected in the top result achieved by the country on
the related pillar (Singapore ranks in the top 3 on 10 of
the 11 indicators composing the border administration
pillar). Singapore established the worlds first national
single window for trade (TradeNet) in 1989, bringing
together more than 35 border agencies. As a result of
this focus on efficiency, Singapore Customs estimated
Reference
Arvis, J.-F., Y. Duval, B. Shepherd, and C. Utoktham. 2013. Trade
Costs in the Developing World. Policy Research Working Paper
No. 6309, World Bank. Access the UNESCAP-World Bank trade
costs database at http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/tradecosts-dataset.
Exogenous factor
Endogenous factor
0.50
-0.375
0.25
0.125
0.00
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.50
Figure 2: Relationship between the Enabling Trade Index, 2014, and average trade costs, 2010
7
Singapore
Armenia
Hungary
Rwanda
Gambia
Burundi
Zimbabwe
2
1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Table6: Performance of the ETI 2014 top 10 countries and presence in the top 5 by pillar
Country/Economy
OVERALL
ETI
1. Domestic
market access
2. Foreign
market access
3. Efficiency
and transparency
of border
administration
4. Availability
and quality
5. Availability
of transport
and quality of
6. Availability
infrastructure transport services and use of ICTs
7. Operating
environment
Number
of times
in top 5
Singapore
13
135
11
11
Netherlands
46
97
New Zealand
65
39
25
16
Finland
46
97
20
17
United Kingdom
46
97
10
11
Switzerland
85
71
12
12
14
Chile
26
64
43
36
25
Sweden
46
97
35
Germany
10
46
97
13
21
12
Japan
13
16
Denmark
17
Qatar
19
France
21
Mauritius
29
Cambodia
93
Lao PDR
98
Libya
106
Nepal
116
REFERENCES
Bhagwati, J. 2013. Dawn of a New System. Finance and Development.
Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. December.
Browne, C., T. Geiger, and T. Gutknecht. 2013. The Executive Opinion
Survey: The Voice of the Business Community. The Global
Competitiveness Report 2013-2014. K. Schwab ed. Geneva: World
Economic Forum.
International Monetary Fund. 2013. World Economic Outlook database
(October 2013 edition). Available at www.imf.org/weo.
Lawrence, S, S. Doherty and M. Drzeniek Hanouz, 2012. Reducing
Supply Chain Barriers: The Enabling Trade Index 2012. The Global
Enabling Trade Report 2012. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
United Nations. 2014. Document on the Focus Areas. Open Working
Group on Sustainable Development Goals. Available at:
http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/focussdgs.html (retrieved 21
February, 2014).
World Economic Forum. 2013. The Global Information Technology
Report 2013; Growth and Jobs in a Hyperconnected World.
Bilbao-Osorio, B., S. Dutta, and B. Lanvin, Editors. Geneva: World
Economic Forum.
CHAPTER 2
North-All
South-North
South-South
South-South Upper Range
South-South Lower Range
80
60
53%
40
2018e
2017e
2016e
2015e
2014e
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
2013e
20
2012e
100
Source: IDB Integration and Trade Sector based on COMTRADE data and IMF WEO, April 2013 (GDP forecasts).
Note: Trade values between 2012 and 2018 are forecasts.
Figure2: Sector composition of LAC south-south exports: intra-LAC vs. LAC-Asia, 19952011
n
n
n
n
100
Manufacturing
Fuels
Ores and Minerals
Agriculture
80
60
40
20
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Intra-LAC
LAC-Asia
North-North
South-North
South-South
15
10
0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Source: IDB Integration and Trade Sector based on TRAINS and INTrade data.
Note: Trade-weighted average of tariff faced by exports.
Figure1: Average impact on municipal exports by a 1% reduction in domestic transport costs, by sector
n Agriculture
n Manufacturing
n Mining
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Mexico
Peru
(Contd.)
Mexico-North
LAC-Asia
Intra-LAC
LAC-North (excl. Mexico)
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Mexico
Brazil
Rest of the Americas
GDP
Growth, %
Export
Growth, %
Import
Growth, %
4.4
3.6
7.5
11.2
29.7
37.9
26.3
73.9
39.1
Figure5: Latin America and the Caribbean pillar scores vs other key regions, 2014
Pillar 2:
Foreign market access
5
4
3
2
1
Pillar 6: Availability
and use of ICTs
Table2: Latin America and Caribbean economies in the Enabling Trade Index, 2014
Enabling
Trade
Index
Pillar 1:
Index
Domestic
market
access
Pillar 2:
Foreign
market
access
Pillar 3:
Pillar 4:
Efficiency
Availability
and
and
transparency
quality of
of border
infrastructure
administration
transport
Pillar 5:
Availability
and
quality of
transport
and services
Pillar 6:
Availability
and use
of ICTs
Pillar 7:
Operating
environment
Economy
Rank
Score
Rank
Score
Rank
Score
Rank
Score
Rank
Score
Rank
Score
Rank
Score
Rank
Score
Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Ecuador
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Uruguay
Venezuela
95
87
86
8
73
42
65
79
71
62
104
125
84
80
61
68
52
113
51
60
137
3.66
3.72
3.77
5.13
4.00
4.39
4.07
3.89
4.04
4.14
3.55
3.11
3.79
3.87
4.15
4.05
4.28
3.45
4.28
4.21
2.81
90
83
108
9
36
20
35
78
14
8
111
103
17
93
33
6
86
37
13
44
120
4.41
4.65
4.01
5.93
5.08
5.55
5.09
4.74
5.75
5.96
3.84
4.12
5.66
4.36
5.19
5.98
4.60
5.06
5.83
4.94
3.48
44
15
77
2
18
16
36
70
21
47
40
22
27
45
29
30
78
88
9
41
86
3.24
3.90
2.38
5.08
3.85
3.89
3.38
2.49
3.75
3.17
3.33
3.72
3.59
3.20
3.55
3.50
2.37
2.22
4.20
3.30
2.23
96
93
80
26
68
46
64
63
84
61
88
126
82
76
62
60
55
120
51
67
133
3.73
3.81
4.17
5.60
4.44
4.88
4.54
4.55
4.07
4.57
3.93
3.06
4.09
4.18
4.56
4.59
4.71
3.25
4.74
4.45
2.71
95
110
102
63
112
117
80
53
75
72
118
135
104
46
58
108
31
111
101
107
127
2.71
2.50
2.65
3.53
2.48
2.44
3.13
3.72
3.28
3.30
2.39
1.94
2.63
3.86
3.64
2.56
4.37
2.49
2.67
2.57
2.23
73
114
60
43
88
83
71
85
63
70
109
138
118
81
59
96
52
108
77
89
121
3.96
3.43
4.20
4.60
3.74
3.83
3.97
3.80
4.14
3.99
3.52
2.72
3.35
3.85
4.22
3.62
4.36
3.53
3.88
3.74
3.32
55
94
48
36
56
62
80
83
69
86
108
133
98
91
73
111
57
92
89
50
87
4.39
3.15
4.72
5.02
4.34
4.20
3.76
3.71
3.98
3.67
2.77
1.91
3.04
3.40
3.81
2.66
4.29
3.37
3.62
4.63
3.66
124
96
90
25
112
46
88
110
114
94
91
131
120
92
97
86
38
93
80
36
138
3.38
3.77
3.86
5.03
3.55
4.48
3.89
3.63
3.55
3.78
3.81
3.28
3.46
3.79
3.76
3.91
4.57
3.78
3.97
4.62
2.59
Pacific Alliance
EU 28
ASEAN
4.39
4.63
3.98
5.51
4.90
4.37
4.17
1.94
4.02
4.84
5.39
4.09
3.08
4.44
3.30
4.11
5.02
4.05
4.20
5.39
3.44
4.08
4.78
4.05
LAC Average
High income OECD Average
Developing Asia Average
3.92
4.85
3.78
4.96
5.04
4.05
3.35
2.10
3.43
4.22
5.62
3.87
2.91
4.76
3.26
3.80
5.22
3.92
3.72
5.67
3.23
3.83
4.99
4.03
Note: Costa Rica is not included in the calculations for Pacific Alliance.
Pillar 9:
Physical security
Pillar 2: Efficiency of
customs administration
2009
2010
2012
5
4
3
Pillar 8: Regulatory
environment
Pillar 3: Efficiency of
import-export procedures
2
1
Pillar 4: Transparency of
border administration
Pillar 7: Availability
and use of ICTs
Figure 7: Most problematic factors for exporting in Latin American and the Caribbean, 2013
10
12
Score*
Figure 8: Most problematic factors for importing in Latin American and the Caribbean, 2013
10
15
20
Score*
3.89
3.5
3.0
3.26
3.18
3.0
2.93
2.86
2.70
2.61
2.59
2.5
2.81
2.77
2.61
2.5
2.46
2.0
1.5
4.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
Caribbean
Andean
Latin America
and the Caribbean
Central America
Sub-Saharan Africa
South Asia
Latin America
and the Caribbean
Middle East
and North Africa
0.0
East Asia
and the Pacific
0.0
Europe and
Central Asia
0.5
North America
0.5
Southern Cone
1.0
Figure 2: LPI scores of Latin American and the Caribbean countries, 2014
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Logistics
Unfriendly
Partial Performers
Chile
Panama
Mexico
Argentina
El Salvador
Brazil
Bahamas
Dominican Republic
Jamaica
Peru
Venezuela
Guatemala
Paraguay
Ecuador
Costa Rica
Uruguay
Nicaragua
Colombia
Honduras
Bolivia
Guyana
Haiti
Cuba
Consistent
Performers
Figure 3: Trade costs and logistics performance in Latin American and the Caribbean, 2011
Caribbean
Southern Cone
350
Central America
Andean
300
250
BOL
PRY
200
SLV
GUY
DOM
CRI
ECU
150
GTM
ARG
COL
PER
BRA
MEX
CHL
100
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2012 LPI
Source: Logistics Performance Index and Arvis and others, 2013.
Notes: The Bahamas, which has trade costs more than twice as high as the LAC average, is excluded from the Caribbean. Trade costs are average trade costs by country for 2011 and
LPI is a countrys 2012 LPI score. The white lines represent the linear fit (solid line) with 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines).
(Contd.)
Southern Cone
Central America
Andean
CHL
3.0
2007 LPI
ARG
PER
ECU
HND
GTM
URY
PRY
DOM
COL
BOL
HTI
SLV
VEN
CRI
2.5
BRA
PAN
MEX
JAM
NIC
GUY
2.0
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2014 LPI
Source: Logistics Performance Index and Arvis and others, 2013.
Notes: Placement below the 45 degree line indicates improvement over time.
Southern Cone
Central America
GUY
Andean
HTI
NIC
120
JAM
BOL
DOM
90
COL
GTM
SLV
VEN
MEX
60
BRA
PAN
CRI
PRY
URY
HND
ECU
PER
ARG
CHL
30
30
60
90
120
150
(Contd.)
Notes
100 x
(LPI 1)
LPIHighest 1
References
Andean Development Corportation. 2013. Latin American Economic
Outlook 2014: Logistics and Competitiveness for Development.
Caracas: Andean Development Corporation.
Anderson, James E. and Eric van Wincoop. 2004. Trade Costs.
Journal of Economic Literature 42(3):691-751.
Arvis, Jean-Francois, Yann Duval, Ben Shapherd, and Chorthip
Utoktham. 2013. Trade Costs in the Developing World. Policy
Research Working Paper 6309. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
Morales Sarriera, Javier; Gonzalo Araya, Tomas Serebrisky, Cecilia
Briceo-Garmendia, and Jordan Schwartz. 2013. Benchmarking
Container Port Technical Efficiency in Latin America and the
Caribbean: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Policy Research Working
paper 6680. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
Novy, Dennis. 2013. Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade
Costs with Panel Data. Economic Inquiry 51(1):101-121.
ASEAN
EU 28
Pacific Alliance
Pillar 7:
Operating environment
5
4
3
2
1
Pillar 6: Availability
and use of ICTs
Figure 2: Most problematic factors for exporting in the Pacific Alliance, 2013
Identifying potential markets and buyers
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation
Access to trade finance
Technical requirements and standards abroad
Inappropriate production technology and skills
Difficulties in meeting quality/quantity requirements of buyers
Access to imported inputs at competitive prices
Tariff barriers abroad
Burdensome procedures foreign borders
High cost or delays caused by international transportation
Rules of origin requirements abroad
Corruption at foreign borders
0
12
15
Score*
Source: World Economic Forum 2013b.
Note: Costa Rica is not included in the calculations for Pacific Alliance.
*From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between 1 (most problematic) and 5.
The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
(Contd.)
Box 3: The Role of Regional Integration in Developing Trade: Pacific Alliance (contd.)
Figure 3: Most problematic factors for importing in the Pacific Alliance, 2013
10
15
20
Score*
Source: World Economic Forum 2013b.
Note: Costa Rica is not included in the calculations for Pacific Alliance.
*From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between 1 (most problematic) and 5.
The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
REFERENCES
Browne, C., T. Geiger and T. Gutknecht. 2013. The Executive Opinion
Survey: The voice of the business community. In The Global
Competitiveness Report 2013-2014. Geneva: World Economic
Forum.
Inter-American Development Bank. 2013. Trade and Integration Monitor:
After the Boom-Prospects for Latin America and Caribbean in
South-South Trade. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development
Bank.
. 2013. INTrade: Latin American Trade Trend Estimates. Washington,
DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
NOTES
1 The definitions of South and North are based on the UN
Standard Country Classification. The North encompasses the
developed countries, including Japan in Asia, Canada and the
United States in North America, Australia and New Zealand in
Oceania, and Europe. The South encompasses developing Asia
(including Middle East), Latin America, and Africa.
2 Developing Asia refers to Asian countries that are defined as the
South; thus, Japan is excluded.
3 Calculations based on Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy
Analysis (CPB) World Trade Monitor.
4 World Economic Forum 2013a. The gravity model was used to
determine the trade flows that were in turn used as inputs into the
CGE modelling exercise. Estimations were based on the ETI 2012.
Country/Economy
Profiles
The Country/Economy Profiles section presents a twopage profile of each of the 138 economies covered by
The Global Enabling Trade Report 2014. Each profile
summarizes an economys performance on the various
dimensions of the Enabling Trade Index (ETI) and
provides additional trade performance indicators.
Country/Economy Profiles
Albania
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
PAGE 1
Rank
(out of 138)
Key indicators
The first section (on the upper left-hand side of the page)
presents a selection of key overall indicators:
6
Foreign
market access
5
4
3
2
1
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Albania
Score*
7
Operating
environment
Score
(17)
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Albania
VALUE
Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
Available intl airline seat km/week, millions ............................................ 111 .......... ........24.2
Quality of air transport infrastructure* ........................................................ 72 .......... ..........4.3
Quality of railroad infrastructure* ............................................................. 107 .......... ..........1.2
Liner Shipping Connectivity Index (0157.1) ........................................... 101 .......... ..........4.4
Quality of port infrastructure* .................................................................. 100 .......... ..........3.5
Paved roads (% of total) ........................................................................... 79 .......... ........39.0
Quality of roads* ....................................................................................... 68 .......... ..........3.9
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar ........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar ........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar ........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
economies
economies
economies
economies
economies
economies
economies
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
Country/Economy Profiles
Index of Countries/Economies
Country/Economy
Page
Country/Economy
Page
Country/Economy
Page
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belgium
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia, The
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
112
114
116
118
120
122
124
126
128
130
132
134
136
138
140
Greece
Guatemala
Guinea
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong SAR
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Korea, Rep.
Kuwait
Kyrgyz Republic
Lao PDR
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
142
144
146
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
170
172
174
176
178
180
182
184
186
188
190
192
194
196
198
200
202
204
206
208
210
212
214
216
218
220
222
224
226
228
230
232
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan, China
Tanzania
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
234
236
238
240
242
244
246
248
250
252
254
256
258
260
262
264
266
268
270
272
274
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
292
294
296
298
300
302
304
306
308
310
312
314
316
318
320
322
324
Country/Economy Profiles
Albania
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Albania
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Albania
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Algeria
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Algeria
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Algeria
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 115 ...........................3.4
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 113 .......... n ..........2.5
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 102 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 106 .......... n ..........2.5
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 94 .......... n ..........3.0
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 93 .......... n ..........3.8
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 128 .......... n ..........2.8
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Angola
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Angola
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Angola
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 131 ...........................2.8
Customs services index (01) ................................................................. 107 .......... n ........0.27
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 106 .......... n ..........2.4
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 127 .......... n ...........43
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 101 .......... n .............9
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 120 .......... n ......2,700
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 128 .......... n ...........40
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 130 .......... n ...........10
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 111 .......... n ......1,860
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 127 .......... n ..........2.2
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 130 .......... n ..........2.5
Customs transparency index (01) ......................................................... 100 .......... n ........0.57
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 134 ...........................2.9
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 84 .......... n ..........2.8
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 123 .......... n ..........2.3
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 100 .......... n ..........2.6
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 96 .......... n ..........3.0
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 133 .......... n ..........1.7
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 138 .......... n ..........1.8
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Argentina
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Argentina
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Argentina
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Armenia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Armenia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Armenia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Australia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Australia
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Australia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Austria
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Austria
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Austria
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Azerbaijan
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Azerbaijan
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Azerbaijan
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 101 ...........................3.6
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 110 .......... n ..........2.6
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 134 .......... n ..........2.1
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 133 .......... n ..........2.1
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 131 .......... n ..........2.6
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 53 .......... n ..........4.9
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 43 .......... n ..........4.5
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Bahrain
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Bahrain
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Bahrain
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Bangladesh
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Bangladesh
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................21.0
Burdensome import procedures .......................................................................... 20.5
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................19.1
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ....................................... 11.1
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ................................. 10.2
Domestic technical requirements and standards .................................................... 7.1
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 6.0
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 5.0
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Bangladesh
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 123 ...........................3.2
Customs services index (01) ................................................................. 102 .......... n ........0.35
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 125 .......... n ..........2.1
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 118 .......... n ...........35
No. of documents to import ..................................................................... 82 .......... n .............8
Cost to import (US$ per container) ........................................................... 80 .......... n ......1,470
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 105 .......... n ...........25
No. of documents to export ..................................................................... 65 .......... n .............6
Cost to export (US$ per container) ........................................................... 58 .......... n ......1,075
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 132 .......... n ..........2.0
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 116 .......... n ..........3.1
Customs transparency index (01) ......................................................... 107 .......... n ........0.38
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 103 ...........................3.6
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 80 .......... n ..........2.8
Logistics competence (15) ...................................................................... 93 .......... n ..........2.6
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 115 .......... n ..........2.5
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 77 .......... n ..........3.2
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 106 .......... n ..........3.5
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 108 .......... n ..........3.3
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Belgium
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Belgium
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Belgium
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Benin
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Benin
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Benin
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 112 ...........................3.4
Customs services index (01) ................................................................. 109 .......... n ........0.26
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) .................................................. 72 .......... n ..........2.6
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 101 .......... n ...........27
No. of documents to import ..................................................................... 57 .......... n .............7
Cost to import (US$ per container) ........................................................... 86 .......... n ......1,520
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 110 .......... n ...........26
No. of documents to export ..................................................................... 65 .......... n .............6
Cost to export (US$ per container) ........................................................... 53 .......... n ......1,030
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 131 .......... n ..........2.1
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 106 .......... n ..........3.3
Customs transparency index (01) ......................................................... 106 .......... n ........0.40
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 122 ...........................3.3
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 96 .......... n ..........2.7
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 118 .......... n ..........2.4
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 116 .......... n ..........2.5
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 112 .......... n ..........2.9
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 104 .......... n ..........3.5
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 132 .......... n ..........2.5
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Bhutan
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Bhutan
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Bhutan
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 102 ...........................3.6
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 80 .......... n ........0.50
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 125 .......... n ..........2.1
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 123 .......... n ...........38
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 134 .......... n ...........12
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 115 .......... n ......2,330
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 127 .......... n ...........38
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 121 .......... n .............9
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 120 .......... n ......2,230
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................... 51 .......... n ..........4.1
Time predictability of import procedures*.................................................. 80 .......... n ..........3.7
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 59 .......... n ........0.80
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 112 ...........................3.4
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 123 .......... n ..........2.4
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 110 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 127 .......... n ..........2.3
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 138 .......... n ..........2.3
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 48 .......... n ..........5.0
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 94 .......... n ..........3.5
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Bolivia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Bolivia
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Bolivia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 114 ...........................3.4
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 127 .......... n ..........2.3
Logistics competence (15) ...................................................................... 86 .......... n ..........2.7
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 91 .......... n ..........2.7
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 130 .......... n ..........2.6
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 107 .......... n ..........3.5
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 86 .......... n ..........3.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................19.5
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................19.1
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................15.1
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .......................................14.3
Domestic technical requirements and standards ..................................................12.9
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 8.6
Corruption at the border ......................................................................................... 6.7
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 3.9
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
For methodology, indicator descriptions and sources, and
for a list of multiple best-performing economies, see page 45.
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Botswana
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Botswana
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Botswana
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 107 ...........................3.5
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 106 ...........................3.5
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 122 .......... n ..........2.4
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 100 .......... n ..........2.6
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 120 .......... n ..........2.4
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 101 .......... n ..........2.9
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 76 .......... n ..........4.4
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 101 .......... n ..........3.4
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Brazil
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Brazil
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................27.0
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................24.9
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .......................................20.1
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ................................... 9.8
Domestic technical requirements and standards ....................................................7.6
Corruption at the border ......................................................................................... 4.8
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 3.0
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 2.9
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Brazil
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Bulgaria
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Bulgaria
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Bulgaria
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Burkina Faso
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Burkina Faso
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Burkina Faso
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 135 ...........................2.4
Customs services index (01) ................................................................. 108 .......... n ........0.26
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) .................................................. 86 .......... n ..........2.5
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 131 .......... n ...........49
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 101 .......... n .............9
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 133 .......... n ......4,430
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 129 .......... n ...........41
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 130 .......... n ...........10
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 125 .......... n ......2,455
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 121 .......... n ..........2.4
Time predictability of import procedures*.................................................. 88 .......... n ..........3.5
Customs transparency index (01) ......................................................... 109 .......... n ........0.20
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 105 ...........................3.6
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 102 .......... n ..........2.6
Logistics competence (15) ...................................................................... 94 .......... n ..........2.6
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 111 .......... n ..........2.5
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 74 .......... n ..........3.2
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 97 .......... n ..........3.8
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 115 .......... n ..........3.1
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Burundi
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Burundi
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Burundi
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 136 ...........................2.4
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 97 .......... n ........0.38
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) .................................................. 77 .......... n ..........2.6
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 130 .......... n ...........46
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 115 .......... n ...........10
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 132 .......... n ......4,420
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 122 .......... n ...........32
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 121 .......... n .............9
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 130 .......... n ......2,905
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 126 .......... n ..........2.2
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 126 .......... n ..........2.8
Customs transparency index (01) ......................................................... 112 .......... n ........0.10
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 119 ...........................3.3
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 108 .......... n ..........2.6
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 106 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 108 .......... n ..........2.5
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 120 .......... n ..........2.8
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 96 .......... n ..........3.8
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 130 .......... n ..........2.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Cambodia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Cambodia
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Cambodia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 108 ...........................3.4
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 66 .......... n ........0.58
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) .................................................. 70 .......... n ..........2.7
No. of days to import ............................................................................... 91 .......... n ...........24
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 101 .......... n .............9
Cost to import (US$ per container) ........................................................... 33 .......... n .........930
No. of days to export................................................................................ 96 .......... n ...........22
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 108 .......... n .............8
Cost to export (US$ per container) ........................................................... 31 .......... n .........795
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 119 .......... n ..........2.4
Time predictability of import procedures*.................................................. 82 .......... n ..........3.7
Customs transparency index (01) ......................................................... 113 .......... n ........0.07
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Cameroon
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Cameroon
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Cameroon
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 121 ...........................3.2
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 91 .......... n ........0.42
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 137 .......... n ..........1.9
No. of days to import ............................................................................... 94 .......... n ...........25
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 126 .......... n ...........11
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 108 .......... n ......2,167
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 101 .......... n ...........23
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 136 .......... n ...........11
Cost to export (US$ per container) ........................................................... 89 .......... n ......1,379
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 114 .......... n ..........2.6
Time predictability of import procedures*.................................................. 83 .......... n ..........3.6
Customs transparency index (01) ......................................................... 102 .......... n ........0.50
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 125 ...........................3.2
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 134 .......... n ..........2.2
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 104 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 107 .......... n ..........2.5
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 116 .......... n ..........2.8
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 122 .......... n ..........2.9
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 120 .......... n ..........3.0
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Canada
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Canada
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................24.6
Burdensome import procedures .......................................................................... 23.9
Domestic technical requirements and standards ..................................................19.6
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................16.6
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ........................................ 6.6
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 5.5
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 2.0
Corruption at the border ..........................................................................................1.3
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Canada
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Chad
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Chad
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Chad
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 138 ...........................2.1
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 130 ...........................3.0
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 128 .......... n ..........2.3
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 120 .......... n ..........2.3
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 88 .......... n ..........2.7
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 97 .......... n ..........3.0
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 131 .......... n ..........2.2
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 134 .......... n ..........2.1
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Chile
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Chile
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Chile
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
China
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
China
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................21.7
Burdensome import procedures .......................................................................... 18.3
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................13.9
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .......................................13.8
Domestic technical requirements and standards ..................................................11.3
Corruption at the border ......................................................................................... 9.6
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ....................................................7.2
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 4.3
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
China
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Colombia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Colombia
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Colombia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Costa Rica
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Costa Rica
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Costa Rica
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Cte dIvoire
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Cte dIvoire
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................24.0
Burdensome import procedures .......................................................................... 23.0
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................15.6
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................13.4
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .......................................10.6
Crime and theft ........................................................................................................9.7
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 2.5
Domestic technical requirements and standards ....................................................1.2
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Cte dIvoire
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 106 ...........................3.5
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 76 .......... n ........0.51
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 110 .......... n ..........2.3
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 117 .......... n ...........34
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 115 .......... n ...........10
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 121 .......... n ......2,710
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 105 .......... n ...........25
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 121 .......... n .............9
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 115 .......... n ......1,990
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................... 90 .......... n ..........3.0
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 101 .......... n ..........3.4
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 83 .......... n ........0.70
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Croatia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Croatia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Croatia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Cyprus
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Cyprus
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Cyprus
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Czech Republic
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Czech Republic
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Czech Republic
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Denmark
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Denmark
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Denmark
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Dominican Republic
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Dominican Republic
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Dominican Republic
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Ecuador
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Ecuador
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Ecuador
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Egypt
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Egypt
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Egypt
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 109 ...........................3.4
Customs services index (01) ................................................................. 104 .......... n ........0.33
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) .................................................. 55 .......... n ..........2.9
No. of days to import ............................................................................... 54 .......... n ...........15
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 115 .......... n ...........10
Cost to import (US$ per container) ........................................................... 23 .......... n .........790
No. of days to export................................................................................ 41 .......... n ...........12
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 108 .......... n .............8
Cost to export (US$ per container) ........................................................... 14 .......... n .........625
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 109 .......... n ..........2.6
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 108 .......... n ..........3.3
Customs transparency index (01) ......................................................... 111 .......... n ........0.13
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
El Salvador
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
El Salvador
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
El Salvador
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Estonia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Estonia
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Estonia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Ethiopia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Ethiopia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................23.7
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................23.1
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .......................................13.9
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................12.0
Domestic technical requirements and standards .................................................. 11.6
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ................................... 6.9
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 5.8
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 2.8
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Ethiopia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 110 ...........................3.4
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 87 .......... n ........0.44
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) .................................................. 97 .......... n ..........2.4
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 129 .......... n ...........44
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 115 .......... n ...........10
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 122 .......... n ......2,760
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 131 .......... n ...........44
No. of documents to export ..................................................................... 85 .......... n .............7
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 118 .......... n ......2,180
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................... 88 .......... n ..........3.1
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 127 .......... n ..........2.8
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 39 .......... n ........0.90
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Finland
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Finland
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Finland
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
France
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
France
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
France
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Gabon
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Gabon
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Gabon
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 135 ...........................2.9
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 109 .......... n ..........2.6
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 127 .......... n ..........2.3
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 138 .......... n ..........1.9
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 137 .......... n ..........2.3
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 123 .......... n ..........2.8
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 124 .......... n ..........2.8
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Gambia, The
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Gambia, The
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Gambia, The
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 110 ...........................3.5
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 98 .......... n ..........2.7
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 129 .......... n ..........2.2
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 137 .......... n ..........2.0
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 135 .......... n ..........2.5
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 69 .......... n ..........4.6
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 45 .......... n ..........4.5
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Georgia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Georgia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Georgia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Germany
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Germany
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Germany
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Ghana
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Ghana
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Ghana
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 102 ...........................3.6
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 91 .......... n ..........2.7
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 117 .......... n ..........2.4
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 73 .......... n ..........2.9
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 110 .......... n ..........2.9
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 90 .......... n ..........3.9
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 111 .......... n ..........3.2
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Greece
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Greece
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Greece
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Guatemala
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Guatemala
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Guatemala
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Guinea
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Guinea
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Guinea
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 122 ...........................3.2
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 131 ...........................3.0
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 119 .......... n ..........2.5
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 119 .......... n ..........2.3
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 119 .......... n ..........2.4
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 88 .......... n ..........3.1
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 130 .......... n ..........2.2
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 135 .......... n ..........2.0
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Guyana
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Guyana
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................26.1
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................19.1
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................15.1
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................14.0
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 9.6
Domestic technical requirements and standards ................................................... 8.3
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ........................................ 5.8
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 2.0
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Guyana
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 109 ...........................3.5
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 121 .......... n ..........2.4
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 126 .......... n ..........2.3
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 112 .......... n ..........2.5
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 124 .......... n ..........2.7
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 88 .......... n ..........4.0
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 54 .......... n ..........4.3
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Haiti
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Haiti
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Haiti
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 126 ...........................3.1
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 138 ...........................2.7
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 132 .......... n ..........2.3
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 133 .......... n ..........2.1
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 125 .......... n ..........2.3
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 128 .......... n ..........2.6
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 129 .......... n ..........2.3
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 137 .......... n ..........2.0
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Honduras
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Honduras
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Honduras
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 118 ...........................3.3
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 85 .......... n ..........2.8
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 111 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 98 .......... n ..........2.6
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 117 .......... n ..........2.8
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 125 .......... n ..........2.7
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 100 .......... n ..........3.4
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
1.01
1.02
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Hungary
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Hungary
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Hungary
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Iceland
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Iceland
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................27.5
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................24.9
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................21.5
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .......................................12.3
Domestic technical requirements and standards .................................................. 11.0
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ....................................................1.7
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 0.8
Corruption at the border ......................................................................................... 0.4
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Iceland
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
India
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
India
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
India
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Indonesia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Indonesia
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Indonesia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 119 ...........................3.3
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Ireland
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Ireland
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Ireland
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Israel
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Israel
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Israel
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Italy
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Italy
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Italy
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Jamaica
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Jamaica
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Jamaica
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Japan
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Japan
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Japan
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Jordan
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Jordan
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................24.9
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................21.8
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ................................. 16.3
Domestic technical requirements and standards ..................................................12.9
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .......................................10.1
Corruption at the border ......................................................................................... 9.5
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 2.5
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 2.0
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Jordan
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Kazakhstan
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Kazakhstan
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Kazakhstan
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 127 ...........................3.0
Customs services index (01) ................................................................. 110 .......... n ........0.25
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 111 .......... n ..........2.3
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 134 .......... n ...........69
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 134 .......... n ...........12
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 134 .......... n ......4,865
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 138 .......... n ...........81
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 130 .......... n ...........10
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 137 .......... n ......4,885
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................... 63 .......... n ..........3.8
Time predictability of import procedures*.................................................. 60 .......... n ..........4.0
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 73 .......... n ........0.77
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Kenya
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Kenya
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Kenya
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 101 ...........................3.6
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 76 .......... n ........0.51
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 134 .......... n ..........2.0
No. of days to import ............................................................................... 99 .......... n ...........26
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 101 .......... n .............9
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 116 .......... n ......2,350
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 110 .......... n ...........26
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 108 .......... n .............8
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 121 .......... n ......2,255
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 102 .......... n ..........2.7
Time predictability of import procedures*.................................................. 85 .......... n ..........3.6
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 73 .......... n ........0.77
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Korea, Rep.
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Korea, Rep.
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Korea, Rep.
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Kuwait
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Kuwait
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Kuwait
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Kyrgyz Republic
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Kyrgyz Republic
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Kyrgyz Republic
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 118 ...........................3.3
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 64 .......... n ........0.58
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 130 .......... n ..........2.0
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 136 .......... n ...........75
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 126 .......... n ...........11
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 136 .......... n ......5,150
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 136 .......... n ...........63
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 121 .......... n .............9
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 136 .......... n ......4,360
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 115 .......... n ..........2.5
Time predictability of import procedures*.................................................. 87 .......... n ..........3.6
Customs transparency index (01) ............................................................. 1 .......... n ........1.00
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 128 ...........................3.1
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 120 .......... n ..........2.4
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 135 .......... n ..........2.1
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 131 .......... n ..........2.2
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 136 .......... n ..........2.4
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 102 .......... n ..........3.6
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 113 .......... n ..........3.2
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Lao PDR
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Lao PDR
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Lao PDR
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 114 ...........................3.4
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 107 ...........................3.5
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 115 .......... n ..........2.5
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 124 .......... n ..........2.3
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 132 .......... n ..........2.2
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 127 .......... n ..........2.7
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 58 .......... n ..........4.8
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 70 .......... n ..........4.0
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Latvia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Latvia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Latvia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Lebanon
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Lebanon
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Lebanon
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Lesotho
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Lesotho
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Lesotho
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 104 ...........................3.6
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 120 ...........................3.3
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 118 .......... n ..........2.5
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 128 .......... n ..........2.2
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 123 .......... n ..........2.4
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 129 .......... n ..........2.6
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 81 .......... n ..........4.2
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 107 .......... n ..........3.3
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Liberia
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Liberia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Liberia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 117 ...........................3.4
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 110 .......... n ..........2.6
Logistics competence (15) ...................................................................... 71 .......... n ..........2.9
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 102 .......... n ..........2.6
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 131 .......... n ..........2.6
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 112 .......... n ..........3.3
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 114 .......... n ..........3.1
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Libya
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Libya
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Libya
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 113 ...........................3.4
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 137 ...........................2.8
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 131 .......... n ..........2.3
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 125 .......... n ..........2.3
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 77 .......... n ..........2.9
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 111 .......... n ..........2.9
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 134 .......... n ..........1.2
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 136 .......... n ..........2.0
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Lithuania
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Lithuania
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................24.4
Burdensome import procedures .......................................................................... 20.0
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ................................. 16.2
Domestic technical requirements and standards ..................................................16.0
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................10.3
Crime and theft ........................................................................................................5.1
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ....................................................4.1
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ........................................ 3.8
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Lithuania
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Luxembourg
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Luxembourg
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Luxembourg
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Macedonia, FYR
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Macedonia, FYR
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Macedonia, FYR
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 100 ...........................3.6
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 124 .......... n ..........2.4
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 105 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 114 .......... n ..........2.5
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 114 .......... n ..........2.8
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 67 .......... n ..........4.6
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 82 .......... n ..........3.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Madagascar
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Madagascar
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................19.7
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................19.1
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................18.0
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................13.3
Crime and theft ...................................................................................................... 12.1
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .........................................7.8
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 5.5
Domestic technical requirements and standards ................................................... 4.4
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Madagascar
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 123 ...........................3.2
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 125 .......... n ..........2.4
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 122 .......... n ..........2.3
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 126 .......... n ..........2.3
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 90 .......... n ..........3.1
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 115 .......... n ..........3.2
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 117 .......... n ..........3.1
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Malawi
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Malawi
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................22.7
Corruption at the border ....................................................................................... 18.2
Burdensome import procedures ........................................................................... 17.4
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................15.2
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ........................................ 8.3
Crime and theft ........................................................................................................7.6
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 5.8
Domestic technical requirements and standards ....................................................4.7
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Malawi
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 130 ...........................3.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Malaysia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Malaysia
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................20.1
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................18.0
Domestic technical requirements and standards ..................................................13.1
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................12.9
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................ 11.1
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .......................................10.6
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 8.3
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 6.0
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Malaysia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Mali
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Mali
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Mali
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 132 ...........................2.7
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 111 ...........................3.5
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 82 .......... n ..........2.8
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 131 .......... n ..........2.2
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 89 .......... n ..........2.7
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 104 .......... n ..........2.9
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 116 .......... n ..........3.2
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 83 .......... n ..........3.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Malta
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Malta
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Malta
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Mauritania
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Mauritania
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Mauritania
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 128 ...........................3.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 136 ...........................2.8
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 138 .......... n ..........2.1
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 138 .......... n ..........2.1
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 128 .......... n ..........2.2
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 122 .......... n ..........2.8
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 128 .......... n ..........2.4
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 123 .......... n ..........2.9
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Mauritius
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Mauritius
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Mauritius
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Mexico
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Mexico
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Mexico
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Moldova
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Moldova
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Moldova
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 116 ...........................3.3
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Mongolia
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Mongolia
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Mongolia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 137 ...........................2.4
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 129 ...........................3.0
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 107 .......... n ..........2.6
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 121 .......... n ..........2.3
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 134 .......... n ..........2.1
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 134 .......... n ..........2.5
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 121 .......... n ..........3.0
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 121 .......... n ..........2.9
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Montenegro
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Montenegro
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................23.7
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................22.7
High cost or delays caused by international transportation .................................. 11.6
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................ 11.0
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation .......................................10.5
Domestic technical requirements and standards ................................................... 9.9
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ....................................................7.3
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 3.2
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Montenegro
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Morocco
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Morocco
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Morocco
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Mozambique
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Mozambique
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Mozambique
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 105 ...........................3.6
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 132 ...........................2.9
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 137 .......... n ..........2.1
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 136 .......... n ..........2.1
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 136 .......... n ..........2.1
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 125 .......... n ..........2.7
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 108 .......... n ..........3.4
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 126 .......... n ..........2.8
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Myanmar
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Myanmar
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Myanmar
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 117 ...........................3.3
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 133 ...........................2.9
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 135 .......... n ..........2.1
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 137 .......... n ..........2.1
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 121 .......... n ..........2.4
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 113 .......... n ..........2.8
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 124 .......... n ..........2.7
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 125 .......... n ..........2.8
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Namibia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Namibia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Namibia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Nepal
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Nepal
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Nepal
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 125 ...........................3.1
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 99 .......... n ........0.36
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 112 .......... n ..........2.3
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 125 .......... n ...........39
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 126 .......... n ...........11
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 117 .......... n ......2,400
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 130 .......... n ...........42
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 136 .......... n ...........11
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 122 .......... n ......2,295
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 122 .......... n ..........2.3
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 105 .......... n ..........3.3
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 78 .......... n ........0.73
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 116 ...........................3.4
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 101 .......... n ..........2.6
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 107 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 86 .......... n ..........2.7
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 93 .......... n ..........3.1
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 113 .......... n ..........3.3
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 127 .......... n ..........2.8
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Netherlands
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Netherlands
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................24.5
Burdensome import procedures .......................................................................... 22.8
Domestic technical requirements and standards ................................................. 20.4
High cost or delays caused by international transportation .................................. 17.8
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ........................................ 6.9
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 3.6
Crime and theft ........................................................................................................2.7
Corruption at the border ..........................................................................................1.2
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Netherlands
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
New Zealand
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
New Zealand
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
New Zealand
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Nicaragua
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Nicaragua
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Nicaragua
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Nigeria
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Nigeria
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Nigeria
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Norway
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Norway
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Norway
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Oman
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Oman
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Oman
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Pakistan
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Pakistan
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Pakistan
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Panama
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Panama
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Panama
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Paraguay
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Paraguay
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Paraguay
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 120 ...........................3.3
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 80 .......... n ........0.50
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) .................................................. 88 .......... n ..........2.5
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 106 .......... n ...........30
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 101 .......... n .............9
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 113 .......... n ......2,275
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 116 .......... n ...........29
No. of documents to export ..................................................................... 85 .......... n .............7
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 110 .......... n ......1,850
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 106 .......... n ..........2.7
Time predictability of import procedures*.................................................. 67 .......... n ..........3.9
Customs transparency index (01) ......................................................... 109 .......... n ........0.20
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 108 ...........................3.5
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 79 .......... n ..........2.8
Logistics competence (15) ...................................................................... 77 .......... n ..........2.8
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 74 .......... n ..........2.9
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 73 .......... n ..........3.2
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 120 .......... n ..........3.0
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 131 .......... n ..........2.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Peru
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Peru
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Peru
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Philippines
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Philippines
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Philippines
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Poland
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Poland
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Poland
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Portugal
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Portugal
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Portugal
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Qatar
Exports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Qatar
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Qatar
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Romania
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Romania
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Romania
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Russian Federation
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Russian Federation
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................18.4
Burdensome import procedures ........................................................................... 17.7
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................16.6
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ....................................... 11.7
High cost or delays caused by international transportation .................................. 11.6
Domestic technical requirements and standards ................................................... 9.8
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 9.0
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 5.2
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Russian Federation
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 103 ...........................3.6
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 43 .......... n ........0.67
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 121 .......... n ..........2.2
No. of days to import ............................................................................... 83 .......... n ...........21
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 115 .......... n ...........10
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 123 .......... n ......2,810
No. of days to export................................................................................ 96 .......... n ...........22
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 121 .......... n .............9
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 126 .......... n ......2,615
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................... 87 .......... n ..........3.1
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 109 .......... n ..........3.2
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 92 .......... n ........0.60
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Rwanda
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Rwanda
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Rwanda
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Saudi Arabia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Saudi Arabia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Saudi Arabia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Senegal
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Senegal
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Senegal
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 104 ...........................3.6
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 59 .......... n ..........3.0
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 103 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 95 .......... n ..........2.7
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 133 .......... n ..........2.5
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 98 .......... n ..........3.8
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 98 .......... n ..........3.5
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Serbia
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Serbia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Serbia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Singapore
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Singapore
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Singapore
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Slovak Republic
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Slovak Republic
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Slovak Republic
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Slovenia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Slovenia
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Slovenia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
South Africa
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
South Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
South Africa
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Spain
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Spain
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Spain
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Sri Lanka
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Sri Lanka
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Sri Lanka
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Sweden
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Sweden
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Sweden
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Switzerland
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Switzerland
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Switzerland
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Taiwan, China
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Taiwan, China
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Taiwan, China
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
1.01
1.02
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Tanzania
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Tanzania
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................25.7
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................18.5
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................14.2
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ....................................... 11.8
Domestic technical requirements and standards ................................................... 8.7
Crime and theft ........................................................................................................7.8
High cost or delays caused by international transportation .................................... 7.1
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ....................................................6.1
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Tanzania
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 111 ...........................3.4
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 127 ...........................3.1
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 129 .......... n ..........2.3
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 132 .......... n ..........2.2
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 135 .......... n ..........2.1
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 105 .......... n ..........2.9
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 110 .......... n ..........3.3
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 105 .......... n ..........3.3
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Thailand
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Thailand
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Thailand
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Tunisia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Tunisia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................23.7
Burdensome import procedures .......................................................................... 23.3
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................18.7
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................ 11.7
Domestic technical requirements and standards ..................................................10.3
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ........................................ 8.2
Crime and theft ........................................................................................................2.1
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 2.0
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Tunisia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Turkey
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Turkey
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Turkey
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Uganda
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Uganda
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................21.9
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................18.4
Burdensome import procedures ...........................................................................16.0
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................13.9
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ....................................... 11.8
Domestic technical requirements and standards ................................................... 8.2
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 6.0
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 3.8
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Uganda
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 115 ...........................3.3
Customs services index (01) ................................................................. 100 .......... n ........0.36
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) .................................................. 57 .......... n ..........2.8
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 114 .......... n ...........33
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 115 .......... n ...........10
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 126 .......... n ......3,375
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 119 .......... n ...........30
No. of documents to export ..................................................................... 85 .......... n .............7
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 129 .......... n ......2,800
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 111 .......... n ..........2.6
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 114 .......... n ..........3.2
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 78 .......... n ........0.73
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Ukraine
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Ukraine
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Ukraine
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 100 ...........................3.6
Customs services index (01) ................................................................. 105 .......... n ........0.33
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) .................................................. 68 .......... n ..........2.7
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 104 .......... n ...........28
No. of documents to import ..................................................................... 82 .......... n .............8
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 119 .......... n ......2,505
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 116 .......... n ...........29
No. of documents to export ..................................................................... 65 .......... n .............6
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 113 .......... n ......1,930
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 116 .......... n ..........2.5
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 129 .......... n ..........2.7
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 39 .......... n ........0.90
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
For methodology, indicator descriptions and sources, and
for a list of multiple best-performing economies, see page 45.
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
United Kingdom
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
United Kingdom
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
United Kingdom
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
United States
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
United States
Advanced economies
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
United States
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Uruguay
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Uruguay
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Uruguay
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Venezuela
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Venezuela
South America
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Venezuela
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 133 ...........................2.7
Customs services index (01) ................................................................... 95 .......... n ........0.40
Efficiency of the clearance process (15) ................................................ 101 .......... n ..........2.4
No. of days to import ............................................................................. 137 .......... n ...........82
No. of documents to import ................................................................... 101 .......... n .............9
Cost to import (US$ per container) ......................................................... 130 .......... n ......3,695
No. of days to export.............................................................................. 135 .......... n ...........56
No. of documents to export ................................................................... 108 .......... n .............8
Cost to export (US$ per container) ......................................................... 133 .......... n ......3,490
Irregular payments in exports and imports*............................................. 136 .......... n ..........1.9
Time predictability of import procedures*................................................ 133 .......... n ..........1.9
Customs transparency index (01) ........................................................... 83 .......... n ........0.70
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 121 ...........................3.3
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................... 68 .......... n ..........2.9
Logistics competence (15) ...................................................................... 76 .......... n ..........2.8
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................... 70 .......... n ..........2.9
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................... 76 .......... n ..........3.2
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 132 .......... n ..........2.1
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 133 .......... n ..........2.1
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Vietnam
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Vietnam
Developing Asia
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................24.4
Burdensome import procedures .......................................................................... 23.3
Corruption at the border ....................................................................................... 18.3
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ....................................... 11.7
Domestic technical requirements and standards ................................................... 8.9
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ................................... 5.8
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 4.6
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 3.0
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Vietnam
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
1.01
1.02
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Yemen
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Yemen
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Yemen
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 124 ...........................3.2
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 124 ...........................3.2
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 126 .......... n ..........2.4
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 130 .......... n ..........2.2
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 130 .......... n ..........2.2
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 119 .......... n ..........2.8
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 109 .......... n ..........3.4
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 110 .......... n ..........3.3
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Zambia
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Zambia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
Tariffs .....................................................................................................................26.1
Burdensome import procedures ........................................................................... 17.3
High cost or delays caused by international transportation ..................................15.6
Corruption at the border ........................................................................................15.2
High cost or delays caused by domestic transportation ........................................ 9.2
Domestic technical requirements and standards ................................................... 9.2
Crime and theft ....................................................................................................... 4.5
Inappropriate telecommunications infrastructure ................................................... 2.9
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Zambia
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 129 ...........................3.0
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 113 ...........................3.4
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 136 .......... n ..........2.1
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 112 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 113 .......... n ..........2.5
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 103 .......... n ..........2.9
Postal services efficiency* ......................................................................... 91 .......... n ..........3.9
Efficiency of transport mode change* ....................................................... 80 .......... n ..........3.7
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Country/Economy Profiles
Zimbabwe
Exports
Imports
Sources: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, United Nations COMTRADE
Rank
(out of 138)
Score
(17)
7
6
Operating
environment
4
3
2
1
Foreign
market access
Efficiency &
transparency
of border
administration
Availability
& use of ICTs
Zimbabwe
Sub-Saharan Africa
Score*
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Score*
* From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for trading in their country and to rank them between
1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Country/Economy Profiles
Zimbabwe
n Competitive Advantage
RANK/138
VALUE
n Competitive Disadvantage
BEST PERFORMER
VALUE
1.03
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
Multiple
2.01
2.02
Chile.........................................................3.5
Mauritius ................................................97.1
Pillar 3: Efficiency and transparency of border administration (17) ............ 134 ...........................2.5
Singapore..................................................... 6.3
Singapore...............................................0.97
Norway ....................................................4.2
Singapore....................................................4
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Singapore................................................440
Multiple economies (5) ................................6
Multiple economies (2) ................................2
Malaysia ..................................................450
New Zealand ............................................6.6
Finland .....................................................6.0
Multiple economies (35) .........................1.00
1.01
1.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
(2) .............................0.0
(2) .............................7.0
(2) .............................0.0
(24) ...........................0.0
(54) ...........................0.0
(2) ................................1
(2) .........................100.0
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
Pillar 5: Availability and quality of transport services (17) .......................... 126 ...........................3.2
Ease and affordability of shipment (15).................................................. 133 .......... n ..........2.2
Logistics competence (15) .................................................................... 108 .......... n ..........2.5
Tracking and tracing ability (15) ............................................................. 129 .......... n ..........2.2
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination (15) ............................. 102 .......... n ..........2.9
Postal services efficiency* ....................................................................... 118 .......... n ..........3.1
Efficiency of transport mode change* ..................................................... 118 .......... n ..........3.0
Luxembourg .............................................3.8
Norway ....................................................4.2
Germany ..................................................4.2
Luxembourg .............................................4.7
Japan .......................................................6.8
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.4
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
Finland .....................................................6.3
Finland .....................................................6.4
Finland .....................................................6.2
Singapore.................................................6.0
Multiple economies (7) .............................4.0
New Zealand ............................................6.5
Singapore.................................................5.4
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................6.1
Switzerland ..............................................6.4
Qatar........................................................4.9
Hong Kong SAR ......................................5.8
Ireland ......................................................5.5
United Arab Emirates ...............................5.6
Ireland ......................................................6.7
Slovenia .................................................92.2
Qatar........................................................6.8
Finland .....................................................6.7
Qatar........................................................6.8
Slovenia ...................................................6.7
Hong Kong SAR ......................................0.2
Multiple economies (48) ...........................7.0
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
Singapore..................................................... 5.7
* Indicator derived from the World Economic Forums Executive Opinion Survey and measured on a 1-to-7 scale, where 7 indicates best outcome.
2014 World Economic Forum
Appendices
Market access
Border administration
Infrastructure
Operating environment
NOTES
6 x
+ 1
The sample minimum and sample maximum values are the lowest
and highest values in the entire sample, respectively. For those
indicators for which a higher value indicates a worse outcome
(e.g. tariff barriers, road congestion), we rely on a transformation
formula that, in addition to converting the values to a 17 score,
reverses it, so that 1 and 7 still correspond to the worst and best
possible outcomes, respectively:
6 x
+ 7
categoryi
indicatork
k=1
(Contd.)
Attilio Di Battista
Attilio Di Battista is a Junior Quantitative Economist with
the Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network at
the World Economic Forum. He works on the development
and computation of a range of indexes and on the analysis
of data for the elaboration of various reports. His areas of
expertise include international trade and competitiveness,
institutions and development, investment flows and financial
stability. Prior to joining the World Economic Forum, he
worked at the International Trade Centre (UNCTAD/WTO) on
export strategy, policy and trade competitiveness analysis.
He has a bachelors degree in International and Diplomatic
Sciences from Universit degli Studi di Trieste in Gorizia
and a masters degree in International Economics from the
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies
in Geneva. He conducted research on the attractiveness of
Italian provinces for foreign direct investments, focusing on
the role of institutions and economic geography.
Sean Doherty
Sean Doherty is Director, Head of Supply Chain & Transport
at the World Economic Forum, having formerly managed
the Forums Chemicals, Mining & Metals communities.
He works on Forum initiatives including Enabling Trade,
Supply Chain Risk, Supply Chain Decarbonization, Border
Anti-Corruption and the Logistics Emergency Teams. He
previously worked for TNT, Booz & Co. and IBM. He has a
masters degree in Aeronautical Engineering from Imperial
College, a masters degree in Structural Molecular Biology
from the University of London, an MBA from the Collge
des Ingnieurs and an executive masters degree in Global
Leadership from the World Economic Forum.
Margareta Drzeniek Hanouz
Margareta Drzeniek Hanouz is Director, Lead Economist,
and Head of Competitiveness Research with the Global
Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network at the World
Economic Forum, where she oversees the competitivenessrelated research. She researches and writes on issues
of national competitiveness, especially those related to
the Arab world, Eastern Europe, international trade and
global risks, and is lead author or editor of a number
of regional and topical reports and papers, including
The Global Enabling Trade Report and The Arab World
Competitiveness Report. Before joining the Global
Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network, she worked
with the International Trade Centre in Geneva, where
she was in charge of relations with Central and Eastern
European countries. She has a Diploma in Economics from
the University of Mnster and has a PhD in International
Economics from the University of Bochum, both in
Germany.
Antoni Estevadeordal
Antoni Estevadeordal is the Manager of the Integration
and Trade Sector of the Inter-American Development
Bank (IDB). He has expertise in trade policy, economic
integration and regional cooperation in Latin America and
the Caribbean, Asia-Pacific and Europe. He has published
widely in academic journals and has edited and authored
several books. He has a PhD in Economics from Harvard
University and a BA in Economics from the University of
Barcelona.
Thierry Geiger
Thierry Geiger is an Economist and Associate Director with
the Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network at
the World Economic Forum. He leads the competitiveness
research on Asia, supervises the development and
computation of a wide range of composite indicators,
and is responsible for the Networks technical assistance
and capacity building activities. His areas of expertise are
private sector development, international trade and applied
economics. He is a co-editor of The Global Enabling Trade
Report, co-author of The Global Competitiveness Report,
and the lead author of several regional and country studies.
A Swiss national, Mr Geiger has a BA in Economics from
the University of Geneva, an MA in Economics from the
University of British Columbia, and was a Fellow of the
Forums Global Leadership Programme. Prior to joining
the Forum, he worked for the World Trade Organization
and Caterpillar Inc. He is Co-Founder of Procab Studio, a
Geneva-based IT company.
Paolo Giordano
Paolo Giordano is the Principal Economist of the Trade
and Integration Sector of the Inter-American Development
Bank (IDB). His analytical and policy work covers trade
policy, economic integration, regional cooperation and
development. He has a PhD in International Economics
from the Institut dEtudes Politiques de Paris - Sciences
Po, an MA in Economics from the Bocconi University of
Milan, and completed his education with executive trainings
at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard
University.
Mauricio Mesquita Moreira
Mauricio Mesquita Moreira is the Principal Economic
Advisor and Research Coordinator of the Integration and
Trade Sector of the Inter-American Development Bank
(IDB). He has a PhD in Economics from the University
College London. Prior to joining the Bank, he held a
position at the Research Department of the Development
Bank of Brazil (BNDES) and taught at the Federal University
of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. He is the lead author of, among
other studies, Too Far to Export: Domestic Transport Costs
and Regional Export Disparities in Latin America (Mauricio
et al., 2013).
Cecilia Briceo-Garmendia
Cecilia Briceo-Garmendia is Lead Economist in the
Sustainable Development Department of the Latin America
and the Caribbean region at the World Bank. She is
currently leading the Regional Flagship on transport and
economic growth. She has worked extensively on issues
related to connectivity, logistics, and port performance,
and co-led the pathbreaking Africa Infrastructure Country
Diagnostic, which created a baseline of infrastructure
performance and estimated economic losses due to
inefficiencies for seven infrastructure subsectors on the
continent. She has worked on projects and research in over
40 countries. Before joining the World Bank, she worked
in software engineering and the design of information and
organizational systems for both private and public sector
enterprises in Venezuela. She has a doctorate degree in
Economics from Georgetown University, in Washington, DC,
and an MBA from the Instituto de Estudios Superiores en
Administracin in Caracas, Venezuela.
Harry Moroz
Harry Moroz is infrastructure specialist in the Sustainable
Development Department of the Latin America and the
Caribbean region at the World Bank. He is currently
supporting the Regional Flagship on transport and
economic growth, focusing on logistics performance,
international transport infrastructure benchmarking and
building a regionally integrated road network using GIS
techniques. Prior to joining the Sustainable Development
Department, he worked on the World Development Report
2014: Managing Risk for Development, researching issues
related to household risk management. Prior to joining the
World Bank, he worked as a Mayoral Fellow with the City
of Chicago where he analysed large datasets of 311 calls
in an effort to improve city services and as a Research
Associate focused on federal urban policy at the Drum
Major Institute for Public Policy in New York City. He has
a masters degree in Public Policy from the University of
Chicago Harris School of Public Policy.
Anasuya Raj
Anasuya Raj joined the World Banks International Trade
Unit as a Consultant in January 2013. She has mainly
worked on trade costs as well as the LPI (Logistics
Performance Index). She graduated from Cambridge
University with a bachelors degree in Mathematics and has
a masters degree from the Ecole Normale Suprieure (Paris
School of Economics).
Ben Shepherd
Ben Shepherd, the Principal of Developing Trade
Consultants Ltd., is a trade economist and international
development consultant. He has worked on a wide range
of trade and development issues with organizations such
as the World Bank, the OECD, the Asian Development
Bank, the United Nations and the FAO. He specializes
in providing policy-relevant research as well as capacitybuilding seminars. He has published more than a dozen
articles in peer-reviewed journals and a similar number of
book chapters. Bens particular areas of expertise include:
trade facilitation, transport and infrastructure; governance,
institutions and anti-corruption; product standards,
technical barriers to trade and sanitary/phyto-sanitary
measures; as well as trade in services and the GATS.
He has a PhD in economics from Sciences Po, Frances
leading public policy school. He has also completed
graduate studies at Cambridge University in the United
Kingdom and the Graduate Institute of International and
Development Studies in Geneva.
Acknowledgments
The World Economic Forum would like to thank the following
organizations for their invaluable support of this Report.
Brambles is a pooling solutions company specializing in the provision of reusable pallets, crates
and containers and associated logistics services through the CHEP and IFCO brands.
Brightstar Corp. is the worlds largest specialized wireless distributor and a leading global
services company, serving mobile device manufacturers, wireless operators and retailers, with a
local presence on six continents and operations in 51 countries and territories. Its industry-leading
services include value-added distribution, supply chain optimization, handset protection and
insurance, buy-back and trade-in solutions, multichannel retail solutions and financial services.
Its services help customers increase product availability, expand channel reach and drive supply
chain efficiencies and innovation.
Deutsche Post DHL is the global market leader in mail and logistics services, with services
ranging from standardized products to tailored solutions. About 475,000 employees in more than
220 countries and territories form a global network focused on service, quality and sustainability.
With several global initiatives, it is committed to social responsibility. In 2012, Deutsche Post DHL
generated revenues of more than 55 billion euros.
DNB is a financial institution in Norway with operations in retail and corporate banking, life
insurance, asset management and capital markets.
Emirates Group comprises Emirates Airlines, Dnata, Mercator, Transguard and Emquest. The
airline divisions include SkyCargo and Destination and Leisure Management, which manages
Emirates Holidays, Arabian Adventures, Congress Solutions International and Emirates Hotels
and Resorts. It operates services to over 102 cities in 62 countries in Europe, the Americas, the
Middle East, Africa, the Indian subcontinent and Asia-Pacific. Its all wide-bodied fleet has over
146 aircraft with a further 145 aircraft on order, worth more than US$ 49 billion.
The Global Express Association represents the four leading international express delivery
companies (DHL Express, FedEx Express, TNT Express and UPS). GEAs members serve over
220 countries and territories worldwide and carry over 30 million packages each day, with
time-definite delivery. Among other things, GEA publishes a Customs Capability Database with
information about border performance indicators in 139 countries. More information about GEA
and its members is available at www.global-express.org or from info@global-express.org.
Acknowledgments
The International Air Transport Association (IATA), founded in April 1945, is the prime vehicle for
inter-airline cooperation in promoting safe, reliable, secure and economical air services. Today
IATA represents 240 airlines comprising 84 percent of international scheduled air traffic.
International Trade Centre (ITC) is the joint agency of the World Trade Organization and the United
Nations. ITC assists small and medium-sized enterprises in developing and transition economies
to become more competitive in global markets, thereby contributing to sustainable economic
development within the frameworks of the Aid for Trade agenda and the Millennium Development
Goals.
A.P. Moller-Maersk is a worldwide conglomerate operating in 130 countries and with a workforce
of some 108,000 employees. It owns one of the worlds largest container shipping companies
and is also active in the energy, logistics, retail and manufacturing industries.
Royal Vopak is the worlds leading independent tank storage company, specializing in the storage
and handling of oil, chemicals, LNG and biofuels. With almost 400 years of experience, it currently
owns and operates 79 terminals in 29 countries. Vopak is listed on the Amsterdam Stock
Exchange and is headquartered in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Stena has international activities in shipping, ferry lines, drilling rigs, real estate, recycling and
finance.
Swiss International Air Lines serves 69 destinations in 37 countries worldwide (winter schedule
2012/13) from its Zurich hub and the Swiss international airports of Basel and Geneva with a fleet
of 91 aircraft. As part of the Lufthansa Group and a member of Star Alliance, its mission is to
provide quality air services that link Switzerland with Europe and the world.
Transnet SOC is a transport and logistics company, wholly owned by the South African
government. It has over 57,000 employees and assets over ZAR 182 billion. It is investing over
ZAR 300 billion over the next seven years on revitalizing and extending its infrastructure by
widening and deepening ports, building a new pipeline, buying hundreds of new locomotives
and addressing a maintenance backlog. Its operating divisions are Transnet Freight Rail,
Transnet National Ports Authority, Transnet Port Terminals, Transnet Pipelines and Transnet Rail
Engineering.
Acknowledgments
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) is the United Nations focal
point for trade and development, and for interrelated issues in the areas of finance, technology,
investment and sustainable development. To assist developing countries to integrate into
the global economy, UNCTAD seeks to help the international community promote a global
partnership for development with coherent global economic policymaking. Besides research
and analysis on development issues, UNCTAD is a forum to build consensus around efforts to
promote national and international policies and strategies conducive to development. Through
technical assistance, UNCTAD supports countries in implementing development strategies to
overcome the challenges of and to benefit from globalization.
UPS (NYSE: UPS) is a global leader in logistics, offering a broad range of solutions including the
transportation of packages and freight, the facilitation of international trade, and the deployment
of advanced technology to more efficiently manage the world of business. Headquartered
in Atlanta, it serves more than 220 countries and territories worldwide. Through a range of
innovative global programmes, The UPS Foundation has developed a multi-sector commitment to
urgent humanitarian relief.
The Volvo Group is one of the worlds leading manufacturers of trucks, buses, construction
equipment and marine and industrial engines. It also provides complete solutions for financing
and service. The Group, which employs about 115,000 people, has production facilities in 19
countries and sells its products in more than 190 markets. Quality, safety and environmental care
are the values that form its common base and are important components of corporate culture.
The World Bank is a vital source of financial and technical assistance to developing countries. It
comprises five institutions managed by their member countries. Established in 1944, the World
Bank Group is headquartered in Washington, D.C. We have more than 10,000 employees in more
than 120 offices worldwide.
Our loans and grants support investments in such areas as education, health, trade,
infrastructure, private sector development and agriculture. Some of our projects are cofinanced
with governments, multilateral institutions, commercial banks, export credit agencies, and private
sector investors. We offer support to developing countries through policy advice, technical
assistance and capacity building.
The World Customs Organization (WCO), with its 179 Members across the globe responsible for
processing approximately 98% of world trade, is the only global intergovernmental organization
uniquely focused on customs matters. Recognized as the voice of the international customs
community, the WCO is particularly noted for its competence in areas covering the development
of global standards, the simplification and harmonization of customs procedures, the security
of the trade supply chain, the facilitation of world trade, customs enforcement and compliance
programmes, coordinated border management, the international Harmonized System goods
nomenclature, customs valuation, origin, and sustainable customs capacity building initiatives. For
more information, visit www.wcoomd.org.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the international organization dealing with the global rules
of trade between nations. Its main function is to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably
and freely as possible.