~ - - - - ~ .

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cour supreme duCanada
Greffe
SupremeCourt of Canada
Registry
J anuary 9, 2012
Ms. Arlene Lowery
203-1808 Smith Street
Regina, Saskatchewan
S4P 2 4
-/-
Dear Ms. Lowery,
RE: Arlene Lowery
v.
Saskatchewan Government, et al.
FileNo.: 33944
/
I hereby acknowledge receipt of your motion for reconsideration of the decision of
the Supreme Court of Canada rendered on March 24, 2011, dismissing your
application for leave to appeal tothis Court.
I wish to advise you that Rule 73 of theRules of the Supreme Court of Canada states
that there shall be no reconsideration of an application for leave to appeal unless
there are exceedingly rare circumstances that warrant consideration by the Court. It
also specifies that amotion for reconsideration must include an affidavit setting out
the exceedingly rare circumstances of the case that warrant consideration by the
Court and anexplanation of why the issue was not previously raised.
I have reviewed your motion for reconsideration and your affidavit in support. I
regret to inform you that, in my opinion, your motion does not reveal the
exceedingly rare circumstances which would warrant reconsideration by this Oourt.
Furthermore, please note that Rule 78 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada
isnot applicable tothis matter.
As aresult, I amreturning your documents.
Yours truly,
Roger Bilodeau, Q.C.
Registrar
c.c.: Mr. Darryl J . Brown
Mr. Henry S. Brown, Q.C.
Mr. Nicholas M. Cann
301, rue Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada KIA OJ 1
Tel.y'Tel, : 613 996-8666 1 888 551-1185 Fax/Telec. : 613996-9138
Internet: www.scc-csc.gc.ca+ E-mail/Courriel:registry-greife@scc-csc.gc.ca
FORM25C
CERTIFICATE
I, Arlene Lowery hereby certify that:
1. Thefollowing Supreme Court of Canada J udge the Right Honourable Chief
J ustice of Canada Beverley McLachlin, Q.C. has been previously involved or
connected with this case.
11. When theApplicant made her application ToTake Leave to Appeal I
considered making arequest that her Honour not beinvolved as I had
previously made acomplaint about J ustice Chicoine toher asthehead of the
Canadian J udicial Council (CJ C).
111. I reasoned that eventhough theresult I was looking for was not forthcoming I
reasoned that shewould not pose aConflict of Interest since another judge or
lawyer handled thematter.
IV. Recently I read onthe internet andthe Supreme Court of Canada website, 3
speeches which her Honour gavewhich had ledmeto conclude that shecould
pose aConflict of Interest afterall.
v. Thetopics of the 3 speeches I amreferring topertain to 'self-litigants', 'the
mentally ill and thelaw' and 'J udicial Independence'.
VI. Her apparent perspective reflects 'a mind-set' that isconcerning tome, dueto
the fact that I amaself-litigant; that lam currently being treated for a'major
depression' which isknowledge tothe Court, and further it ismy firmbelief
that 'corruption andpartisanship' is anissue.
VII. Therefore it is my position that theRight Honourable Chief J ustice of Canada
Beverley McLachlin, Q.c. could prejudice me and my granddaughter, who is
struggling with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (Severe Anxiety Disorder) and
is also being treated, and has requested to bea'joinder' Applicant
(Appellant) ..
* Explanation and Excerpts fromthese 3 Speeches areat Exhibit A
SlGNEDBY:
December 16
th
, 2010