You are on page 1of 3

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF

THE RECENT CEMENT GRINDING SYSTEMS


WITH PARTICLE-BASED INFLUENCES ON CEMENT PROPERTIES






A THESIS SUBMITTED TO
THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES
OF
MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY






BY

BERKAN FDAN







IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR
THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE
IN
CEMENT ENGINEERING










FEBRUARY 2011



ABSTRACT

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF
THE RECENT CEMENT GRINDING SYSTEMS
WITH PARTICLE-BASED INFLUENCES ON CEMENT PROPERTIES

Fidan, Berkan
M. Sc., Department of Cement Engineering
Supervisor: Prof. Dr. etin Hoten
Co-supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. mer Kuleli

February 2011, 95 pages

The conventional cement grinding system, the ball mill, has very poor
efficiencies in spite of innovative improvements. For this purpose, development
of new techniques, which allow proper size reduction and uniform particle size
distribution with less specific energy consumptions, have become a necessity.
The aim of this study is to make a comparative analysis of the fairly new cement
grinding technologies, COMFLEX

Grinding System, Roller Press and


HOROMILL

, at the same cement production plant with the same raw materials.
In this context, CEM I 42.5 R type cement was produced with a fixed Blaine
fineness of 3600 (100) cm
2
/g at three different grinding units. The same raw
materials, clinker and gypsum, and identical feeding ratios, 95% and 5%, were
used to produce cement. Accordingly, these different grinding techniques were
inspected with respect to the microstructural properties of cement particles, and
the relative chemical, physical and mechanical properties of products.
It was found that the main cement grinding parameters, specific surface area
and sieve residue, do not show expected relation and change with each grinding
system due to differences in the size reduction technique. Moreover, strength
and other hardened mortar properties are directly affected by the liberation
conditions of reactive grains at grinding stages.
High capacity and low specific energy consumption i.e. the breaking and cracking
efficiency of the roller press and higher grinding performance of the ball mill
promoted the COMFLEX

system. On the other hand, the roller press was clearly


advantageous at early strength performances with moderate specific energy
usages during grinding. Nonetheless, it also had drawbacks like higher water
demand and earlier setting times (which mean higher hydration temperatures).
When the wideness and sharpness of classification results were considered,
HOROMILL

gave better results with high circulation and efficient air


classification design; although there were weaknesses of the system such as
lower capacity and higher specific energy consumption rate.


Keywords: Cement Grinding, COMFLEX, HOROMILL, Roller Press, Size and Shape
of Cement Particles

You might also like