STAR FI RE - The Gol d of t he Gods

The t r ue Gr ai l bl oodl i ne or i gi nat ed wi t h t he Anunnaki gods i n sout her n Sumer i a

at l east 6, 000 year s ago and was sust ai ned by i ngest i on of an al chemi cal
subst ance cal l ed ' St ar Fi r e' .

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ext r act ed f r omNEXUS Magazi ne, Vol ume 5, Number 6 ( Oct ober - November 1998) .
PO Box 30, Mapl et on Ql d 4560 Aust r al i a. edi t or @nexusmagazi ne. com
Tel ephone: +61 ( 0) 7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 ( 0) 7 5442 9381
Fr omour web page at : www. nexusmagazi ne. com

Fr oma l ect ur e pr esent ed by
Si r Laur ence Gar dner , Kt St Gm. , KCD, KT St A.
at t he 1998 NEXUS Conf er ence hel d i n Sydney, 25- 26 J ul y
Tr anscr i pt Si r Laur ence Gar dner 1998

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I t i s now near l y t wo year s si nce my book, Bl oodl i ne of t he Hol y Gr ai l , was
publ i shed, and f or t hose of you who have not r ead t hi s ( or have not seen t he
ser i al i sed l ect ur e t r anscr i pt i n NEXUS magazi ne) , t he i nvest i gat i on i s
essent i al l y concer ned wi t h t he Messi ani c Bl oodl i ne as i t has descended t hr ough
t he f ami l y of J esus Chr i st down t o t he pr esent day. I t i s al so concer ned wi t h
compar i ng t he New Test ament Gospel s wi t h t he f i r st - hand hi st or i cal account s of
t he er a, as r el at ed i n bot h t he Roman and J ewi sh ar chi ves. I n t hi s r egar d, i t
det ai l s how t he event ual Chr i st i an Hi gh Chur ch cor r upt ed and mani pul at ed t he
ear l y r ecor ds t o sui t i t s own pol i t i cal agenda.

Despi t e t he cont r i ved doct r i ne t hat J esus was bor n of a vi r gi n and was t he ' one
and onl y' son of God ( def i ni t i ons t hat di d not f eat ur e i n t he or i gi nal pr e- Roman
t ext s) , t he New Test ament Gospel s of Mat t hew and Luke act ual l y gi ve det ai l s of
J esus' descendant l i neage f r omDavi d of I sr ael and t he Ki ngs of J udah. Thi s has
l ed t o t he one quest i on I have been asked mor e t han any ot her dur i ng t he past
mont hs. The quest i on ( i n i t s var i ous f or ms) asks qui t e si mpl y: What was so
speci al about t hi s Bl oodl i ne i n t he f i r st pl ace?

Gi ven t hat t he dynast i c successi on f r omJ esus has been expr essl y pr omi nent i n
sover ei gn and pol i t i cal af f ai r s t hr ough 2, 000 year s - wi t h t he f ami l y const ant l y
suppor t i ng const i t ut i onal democr acy agai nst cont r ol by t he Chur ch est abl i shment
- i t s st at us r est s upon t he f act t hat J esus was a l i neal descendant of Ki ng
Davi d.

But , what was i t t hat made t he l i ne of Davi d so i mpor t ant , and so di f f er ent f r om
any ot her ? I t was t hi s ver y quest i on whi ch set me on t he t r ai l f or my next book,
Genesi s of t he Gr ai l Ki ngs, whi ch t el l s t he st or y of t he Messi ani c l i ne f r omt he
ver y begi nni ng.

The Bi bl e expl ai ns t hat t he Bl oodl i ne st or y began wi t h Adamand Eve, f r omwhose
t hi r d son, Set h, evol ved a l i ne whi ch pr ogr essed t hr ough Met husel ah and Noah,
and event ual l y t o Abr ahamwho became t he Gr eat Pat r i ar ch of t he Hebr ew nat i on.
I t t hen r el at es t hat Abr ahambr ought hi s f ami l y west war ds out of Mesopot ami a
( pr esent - day I r aq) t o t he l and of Canaan ( or Pal est i ne) , f r omwher e some of hi s
descendant s moved i nt o Egypt . Af t er a f ew gener at i ons t hey moved back i nt o
Canaan wher e, i n t i me, t he event ual Davi d of Bet hl ehembecame Ki ng of t he newl y
def i ned Ki ngdomof I sr ael .

I f vi ewed as i t i s pr esent ed i n t he scr i pt ur es, t hi s i s a f asci nat i ng saga; but
t her e i s not hi ng anywher e t o i ndi cat e why t he ancest r al l i ne of Davi d and hi s
hei r s was i n any way speci al . I n f act , qui t e t he r ever se i s t he case. Hi s
ancest or s ar e por t r ayed as a successi on of wander i ng t er r i t or y- seeker s who ar e
seen t o be of no par t i cul ar si gni f i cance unt i l t he t i me of Ki ng Davi d. Thei r
bi bl i cal hi st or y bear s no compar i son t o, say, t he cont empor ar y Phar aohs of
anci ent Egypt . Thei r si gni f i cance, we ar e t ol d, comes f r omt he f act t hat ( f r om
t he t i me of Abr aham) t hey wer e desi gnat ed as ' God' s chosen peopl e' . But even
t hi s l eaves us wonder i ng, because, accor di ng t o t he scr i pt ur es, t hei r God l ed
t hemt hr ough not hi ng but a successi on of f ami nes, war s and gener al har dshi p -
and, on t he f ace of i t , t hese ear l y Hebr ews do not appear t o have been t oo
br i ght !

We ar e f aced, t her ef or e, wi t h a coupl e of possi bi l i t i es. Ei t her Davi d was not of
t hi s Abr ahamsuccessi on at al l , and was si mpl y gr af t ed i nt o t he l i st by l at er
wr i t er s. Or maybe we have been pr esent ed wi t h a ver y cor r upt ed ver si on of t he
f ami l y' s ear l y hi st or y - a ver si on t hat was speci f i cal l y desi gned t o uphol d t he
emer gent J ewi sh f ai t h, r at her t han t o r epr esent hi st or i cal f act .

I n consi der at i on of t hi s, I was r emi nded of pr eci sel y what I had f ound wi t h t he
New Test ament . The Gospel t ext s t hat have been i n t he publ i c domai n f or
cent ur i es bear l i t t l e r el at i on t o t he f i r st - hand account s of t he er a. The New
Test ament , as we know i t , was compi l ed by t he 4t h- cent ur y bi shops t o suppor t t he
newl y cont r i ved Chr i st i an bel i ef . But , what i f t he J ewi sh scr i bes had pr evi ousl y
done exact l y t he same t hi ng?

Cl ear l y, I had t o get back t o t he mor e anci ent wr i t i ngs i n or der t o f i nd any
anomal i es. The pr obl emwas t hat , even i f t hi s wer e possi bl e, t he ear l i est Hebr ew
wr i t i ngs ( whi ch wer e r ehashed many cent ur i es l at er ) wer e t hemsel ves onl y wr i t t en
bet ween t he 6t h and t he 1st cent ur i es BC, so t hey wer e not l i kel y t o be t hat
aut hent i c i n t hei r t el l i ng of hi st or y f r omt housands of year s bef or e. I ndeed, i t
was pl ai n t hat t hi s woul d be t he case, because when t hese books wer e f i r st
wr i t t en t hei r expr ess pur pose was t o convey a hi st or y whi ch uphel d t he
pr i nci pl es of t he J ewi sh f ai t h - a f ai t h t hat di d not emer ge unt i l wel l i nt o t he
ancest r al st or y.

Gi ven t hat t he f i r st gr oup of t hese books was wr i t t en whi l e t he J ews wer e hel d
capt i ve i n Mesopot ami an Babyl on i n t he 6t h cent ur y BC, i t i s appar ent t hat
Babyl on was wher e t he or i gi nal r ecor ds wer e t hen hel d. I n f act , f r omt he t i me of
Adam, t hr ough some 19 sai d gener at i ons down t o Abr aham, t he whol e of Ol d
Test ament pat r i ar chal hi st or y was Mesopot ami an. Mor e speci f i cal l y, t he hi st or y
was f r omSumer i n sout her n Mesopot ami a, wher e t he anci ent Sumer i ans di d i ndeed
r ef er t o t he gr assl ands of t he Euphr at es del t a as t he Eden.

When r esear chi ng f or Bl oodl i ne of t he Hol y Gr ai l , I f ound t hat good sour ces f or
some backgr ound i nf or mat i on wer e t he var i ous Gospel s and t ext s t hat wer e not
sel ect ed f or i ncl usi on i n t he canoni cal New Test ament . Per haps, I t hought , t he
same mi ght appl y t o t he Ol d Test ament . The books of Enoch and J ubi l ees, f or
exampl e, wer e among t hose not i ncl uded.

A f ur t her book, t o whi ch at t ent i on i s speci f i cal l y dr awn i n t he Ol d Test ament
books of J oshua and Samuel , i s t he Book of J asher . But despi t e i t s appar ent
i mpor t ance t o t he Hebr ew wr i t er s, i t was not i ncl uded i n t he f i nal sel ect i on.

Two ot her wor ks ar e al so ci t ed i n t he Bi bl e. The Book of Number s dr aws our
at t ent i on t o t he Book of The War s of J ehovah. And i n t he Book of I sai ah we ar e
di r ect ed t owar ds t he Book of t he Lor d.

What ar e t hese books? Wher e ar e t hese books? They ar e al l ment i oned i n t he Bi bl e
( whi ch means t hey al l pr e- dat e t he Ol d Test ament ) , and t hey ar e al l ci t ed as
bei ng i mpor t ant . So, why di d t he edi t or s see f i t t o excl ude t hemwhen t he
sel ect i on was made?

I n pur sui ng an answer t o t hi s quest i on and i n st udyi ng t he subst ance of t he Ol d
Test ament pr i or t o i t s cor r upt i on, one f act whi ch becomes i ncr easi ngl y cl ear i s
t hat i n Engl i sh- l anguage Bi bl es t he def i ni t i on ' Lor d' i s used i n a gener al
cont ext , but i n ear l i er t ext s a posi t i ve di st i nct i on i s dr awn bet ween ' J ehovah'
and ' t he Lor d' .

I t has of t en been wonder ed why t he bi bl i cal God of t he Hebr ews l ed t hemt hr ough
t r i al s and t r i bul at i ons, f l oods and di sast er s, when ( f r omt i me t o t i me) he
appear s t o have per f or med wi t h a qui t e cont r ar y and mer ci f ul per sonal i t y. The
answer i s t hat , al t hough now seemi ngl y embr aced as ' t he One God' by t he J ewi sh
and Chr i st i an chur ches, t her e was or i gi nal l y a di st i nct di f f er ence bet ween t he
f i gur es of J ehovah and t he Lor d. They wer e, i n f act , qui t e separ at e dei t i es. The
god r ef er r ed t o as ' J ehovah' was t r adi t i onal l y a st or mgod, a god of wr at h and
vengeance, wher eas t he god r ef er r ed t o as ' t he Lor d' was a god of f er t i l i t y and
wi sdom.

So, what was t he name gi ven t o t he Lor d i n t he ear l y wr i t i ngs? I t was, qui t e
si mpl y, t he pr evai l i ng Hebr ew wor d f or ' Lor d' , and t he wor d was ' Adon' . As f or
t he appar ent per sonal name of J ehovah, t hi s was not used i n t he ear l y days, and
even t he Bi bl e t el l s t hat t he God of Abr ahamwas cal l ed ' El Shaddai ' , whi ch
means ' Lof t y Mount ai n' .

The appar ent name ' J ehovah' came f r omt he or i gi nal Hebr ew st emYHWH, whi ch meant
' I amt hat I am' - sai d t o be a st at ement made by God t o Moses on Mount Si nai ,
hundr eds of year s af t er t he t i me of Abr aham. ' J ehovah' was t her ef or e not a name
at al l , and ear l y t ext s r ef er si mpl y t o ' El Shaddai ' and t o hi s opposi ng
count er par t , ' Adon' .

To t he Canaani t es, t hese gods wer e r espect i vel y cal l ed ' El El yon' and ' Baal ' -
whi ch meant pr eci sel y t he same t hi ngs ( ' Lof t y Mount ai n' and ' Lor d' ) .

I n our moder n Bi bl es, t he def i ni t i ons ' God' and ' Lor d' ar e used and i nt er mi xed
t hr oughout , as i f t hey wer e one and t he same char act er , but or i gi nal l y t hey wer e
not . One was a vengef ul god ( a peopl e- hat er ) , and t he ot her was a soci al god ( a
peopl e- suppor t er ) , and t hey each had wi ves, sons and daught er s.

The ol d wr i t i ngs t el l us t hat t hr oughout t he pat r i ar chal er a t he I sr ael i t es
endeavour ed t o suppor t Adon, t he Lor d, but at ever y t ur n El Shaddai ( t he st or m
god, J ehovah) r et al i at ed wi t h f l oods, t empest s, f ami nes and dest r uct i on. Even at
t he ver y l ast ( ar ound 600 BC) , t he Bi bl e expl ai ns t hat J er usal emwas over t hr own
at J ehovah' s bi ddi ng and t ens of t housands of J ews wer e t aken i nt o Babyl oni an
capt i vi t y si mpl y because t hei r Ki ng ( a descendant of Ki ng Davi d) had er ect ed
al t ar s i n vener at i on of Baal , t he Adon.

I t was dur i ng t he cour se of t hi s capt i vi t y t hat t he I sr ael i t es weakened and
f i nal l y conceded. They deci ded t o succumb t o t he ' God of Wr at h' , and devel oped a
new r el i gi on out of sheer f ear of hi s r et r i but i on. I t was at t hi s t i me t hat t he
name of J ehovah f i r st appear ed - and t hi s was onl y 500 year s bef or e t he t i me of
J esus.

Subsequent l y, t he Chr i st i an Chur ch t ook J ehovah on boar d as wel l , cal l i ng hi m
si mpl y ' God' - and al l t he hi t her t o soci al concept s of t he Adon wer e t ot al l y
di scar ded. The t wo r el i gi ons wer e hencef or t h bot h f ai t hs of f ear . Even t oday,
t hei r f ol l ower s ar e cl assi f i ed as ' God- f ear i ng' .

So, wher e does t hat l eave us? I t l eaves us knowi ng t hat wi t hi n an over al l
pant heon of gods and goddesses ( many of whomar e act ual l y named i n t he Bi bl e) ,
t her e wer e t wo pr edomi nant and opposi ng gods. I n di f f er ent cul t ur es t hey have
been known as ' El El yon' and ' Baal ' ; ' El Shaddai ' and ' Adon' ; ' Ar hi man' and
' Mazda' ; ' J ehovah' and ' Lor d' ; ' God' and ' Fat her ' . But t hese st yl es ar e al l
t i t ul ar ; t hey ar e not per sonal names.

So who pr eci sel y wer e t hey? To f i nd t he answer we have t o l ook no f ur t her t han
wher e t hese gods wer e act ual l y oper at i ve, and t he ol d Canaani t e t ext s
( di scover ed i n Syr i a i n t he 1920s) t el l us t hat t hei r cour t s wer e i n t he Ti gr i s-
Euphr at es val l ey i n Mesopot ami a, i n t he Sumer i an Eden del t a of t he Per si an Gul f .

But what di d t he anci ent Sumer i ans cal l t hese t wo gods? What wer e t hei r per sonal
names? We can t r ace t he Sumer i an wr i t t en r ecor ds back t o about 3700 BC, and t hey
t el l us t hat t he gods i n quest i on wer e br ot her s. I n Sumer , t he st or mgod who
event ual l y became known as J ehovah was cal l ed ' Enl i l ' or ' I l u- kur - gal ' ( meani ng
' Rul er of t he Mount ai n' ) , and hi s br ot her , who became Adon, t he Lor d, was cal l ed
' Enki ' . Thi s name i s r eal l y i mpor t ant t o our st or y because ' Enki ' means
' Ar chet ype' .

The t ext s i nf or mus t hat i t was Enl i l who br ought t he Fl ood; i t was Enl i l who
dest r oyed Ur and Babyl on, and i t was Enl i l who const ant l y opposed t he educat i on
and enl i ght enment of humanki nd. I ndeed, t he ear l y Syr i an t ext s t el l us t hat i t
was Enl i l who obl i t er at ed t he ci t i es of Sodomand Gomor r ah on t he Dead Sea - not
because t hey wer e dens of wi ckedness, as we ar e t aught , but because t hey wer e
gr eat cent r es of wi sdomand l ear ni ng.

I t was Enki , on t he ot her hand, who, despi t e t he wr at h of hi s br ot her , gr ant ed
t he Sumer i ans access t o t he Tr ee of Knowl edge and t he Tr ee of Li f e. I t was Enki
who set up t he escape st r at egy dur i ng t he Fl ood, and i t was Enki who passed over
t he t i me- honour ed Tabl es of Dest i ny - t he t abl es of sci ent i f i c l aw whi ch became
t he bedr ock of t he ear l y myst er y school s i n Egypt .

Many books t al k about t he her met i c school of Tut hmosi s I I I of Egypt , who r ei gned
about 1450 BC. But i t i s not gener al l y known t hat t he school he or i gi nal l y
i nher i t ed was t he Royal Cour t of t he Dr agon. Thi s had been f ounded by t he
pr i est s of Mendes i n about 2200 BC and was subsequent l y r at i f i ed by t he 12t h
dynast y Queen Sobeknef r u.

Thi s sover ei gn and pr i est l y Or der passed f r omEgypt t o t he Ki ngs of J er usal em;
t o t he Bl ack Sea Pr i nces of Scyt hi a and i nt o t he Bal kans - not abl y t o t he Royal
House of Hungar y, whose Ki ng Si gi smund r econst i t ut ed t he Cour t j ust 600 year s
ago. Today i t exi st s as t he I mper i al and Royal Cour t of t he Dr agon Sover ei gnt y,
and af t er some 4, 000 year s i t i s t he ol dest sover ei gn Cour t i n t he wor l d.

But what wer e t he ear l i est ai ms and ambi t i ons of t he Or der back i n Phar aoni c
t i mes? They wer e t o per pet uat e and advance t he al chemi cal st r engt h of t he Royal
Bl oodl i ne f r omLor d Enki , t he Ar chet ype.

The ki ngs of t he ear l y successi on ( who r ei gned i n Sumer and Egypt bef or e
becomi ng Ki ngs of I sr ael ) wer e anoi nt ed upon cor onat i on wi t h t he f at of t he
Dr agon ( t he sacr ed cr ocodi l e) . Thi s nobl e beast was r ef er r ed t o i n Egypt as t he
Messeh ( f r omwhi ch der i ved t he Hebr ew ver b ' t o anoi nt ' ) , and t he ki ngs of t hi s
dynast i c successi on wer e al ways r ef er r ed t o as ' Dr agons' , or ' Messi ahs' ( meani ng
' Anoi nt ed Ones' ) .

I n t i mes of bat t l e, when t he ar mi es of di f f er ent ki ngdoms wer e conj oi ned, an
over al l l eader was chosen and he was cal l ed t he ' Gr eat Dr agon' ( t he ' Ki ng of
Ki ngs' ) - or , as we bet t er know t he name i n i t s ol d Cel t i c f or m, t he
' Pendr agon' .

One of t he i nt er est i ng i t ems f r omt he ar chi ves of t he Dr agon Cour t i s t he or i gi n
of t he wor d ' ki ngshi p' . I t der i ves f r omt he ver y ear l i est of Sumer i an cul t ur e,
wher ei n ' ki ngshi p' was i dent i cal wi t h ' ki nshi p' - and ' ki n' means ' bl ood
r el at i ve' . I n i t s or i gi nal f or m, ' ki nshi p' was ' kai nshi p' . And t he f i r st Ki ng of
t he Messi ani c Dr agon successi on was t he bi bl i cal Cai n ( Kai n) , head of t he
Sumer i an House of Ki sh.

On r ecogni si ng t hi s, one can i mmedi at el y see t he f i r st anomal y i n t he
t r adi t i onal Genesi s st or y, f or t he hi st or i cal l i ne t o Davi d and J esus was not
f r omAdamand Eve' s son Set h at al l . I t was f r omEve' s son Cai n, whose r ecor ded
successor s ( al t hough gi ven l i t t l e space i n t he Ol d Test ament ) wer e t he f i r st
gr eat Ki ngs ( or Kai ns) of Mesopot ami a and Egypt .

Two mor e i mpor t ant f eat ur es t hen come t o l i ght when r eadi ng t he Bi bl e agai n wi t h
t hi s knowl edge i n mi nd. We al l t end t o t hi nk of Cai n as bei ng t he f i r st son of
Adamand Eve, but he was not . Even t he Book of Genesi s t el l s us t hat he was not ,
and i t conf i r ms how Eve t ol d Adamt hat Cai n' s f at her was t he Lor d. Who was ' t he
Lor d' ? The Lor d was Adon, and Adon was Enki . Even out si de t he Bi bl e, t he
wr i t i ngs of t he Hebr ew Tal mud and Mi dr ash make i t qui t e pl ai n t hat Cai n was not
t he son of Adam.

So what el se have we been wr ongl y t aught about t hi s par t i cul ar aspect of
hi st or y? The Book of Genesi s ( i n i t s Engl i sh- t r ansl at ed f or m) t el l s us t hat Cai n
was ' a t i l l er of t he gr ound' . But t hi s i s not what t he or i gi nal t ext s say at
al l . What t hey say i s t hat Cai n had ' domi ni on over t he Ear t h' - whi ch i s a
r at her di f f er ent mat t er when consi der i ng hi s ki ngl y st at us.

I n f act , t he Bi bl e t r ansl at or s appear t o have had a const ant pr obl emwi t h t he
wor d ' Ear t h' , of t en t r ansl at i ng i t t o ' gr ound' , ' cl ay' or ' dust ' . But t he ear l y
t ext s act ual l y r ef er r ed t o ' The Ear t h' . Even i n t he case of Adamand Eve, t he
t r ansl at or s got i t wr ong. The Bi bl e says: ' Mal e and f emal e he cr eat ed t hem, and
he cal l ed t hei r name Adam. ' The ol der wr i t i ngs use t he mor e compl et e wor d
' Adama' , whi ch means ' of t he Ear t h' . But t hi s di d not mean t hey wer e made of
di r t ; i t means t hat t hey wer e ' of The Ear t h' - or , as t he Anchor Hebr ew Bi bl e
expl ai ns i n absol ut el y pr eci se t er ms, t hey wer e ' Ear t hl i ngs' .

Ther e i s a l ot t o be sai d about t he st or y of Adamand Eve and of how t hey wer e
t he r esul t of cl i ni cal cl oni ng. Wr i t er s such as Zechar i ah Si t chi n have wr i t t en
at some l engt h i n t hi s r egar d, and my new book del ves f ar mor e deepl y i nt o t he
subj ect . I shal l not dwel l upon t hi s par t i cul ar aspect now because I want t o
move mor e di r ect l y i nt o t he al chemy of t he Messi ani c Bl oodl i ne of t he Ear t hl y
Dr agon Ki ngs. What I wi l l say i s t hat t he Sumer i an r ecor ds st at e t hat ar ound
6, 000 year s ago, Adamand Eve ( known t hen as ' At abba' and ' Ava' , and j oi nt l y as
t he ' Adama' ) wer e pur pose- br ed f or ki ngshi p at t he House of Shi mt i by Enki and
hi s si st er - wi f e Ni n- khur sag. I n Sumer i an, t he wor d Shi - i m- t i meant ' br eat h- wi nd-
l i f e' .

Adamwas cer t ai nl y not t he f i r st man on Ear t h, but he was t he f i r st of t he
al chemi cal l y devi sed ki ngl y successi on. Ni n- khur sag was cal l ed ' Lady of t he
Embr yo' or ' Lady of Li f e' , and she was t he sur r ogat e mot her f or At abba and Ava
who wer e cr eat ed f r omhuman ova f er t i l i sed by t he Lor d Enki .

I t was because of Ni n- khur sag' s t i t l e, Lady of Li f e, t hat Ava was l at er gi ven
t he same t i t l e by t he Hebr ews. I ndeed, t he name Ava ( or Eve) was subsequent l y
sai d t o mean ' Li f e' . And t her e i s an i nt er est i ng par al l el her e, because i n
Sumer i an t he di st i nct i on ' Lady of Li f e' was Ni n- t ( Ni n meani ng ' Lady' , and t
meani ng ' Li f e' ) . However , anot her Sumer i an wor d, t i ( wi t h t he l onger
pr onunci at i on, ' t ee' ) , meant ' r i b' ; and i t was by vi r t ue of t he Hebr ews'
mi sunder st andi ng of t he t wo wor ds, t and t i , t hat Eve al so became i ncor r ect l y
associ at ed wi t h Adam' s r i b.

Bot h Enki and Ni n- khur sag ( al ong wi t h t hei r br ot her Enl i l , t he l at er J ehovah)
bel onged t o a pant heon of gods and goddesses r ef er r ed t o as t he Anunnaki ,
meani ng ' Heaven came t o Ear t h' . I n f act , t he Gr and Assembl y of t he Anunnaki
( l at er cal l ed t he ' Cour t of t he El ohi m' ) i s ment i oned i n Psal m82 wher ei n
J ehovah makes hi s bi d f or supr eme power over t he ot her gods.

Accor di ng t o t he Dr agon t r adi t i on, t he i mpor t ance of Cai n was t hat he was
di r ect l y pr oduced by Enki and Ava, so hi s bl ood was t hr ee- quar t er s Anunnaki . Hi s
hal f - br ot her s Hevel and Sat anael ( bet t er known as Abel and Set h) wer e l ess t han
hal f Anunnaki , bei ng t he of f spr i ng of At abba and Ava ( Adamand Eve) .

Cai n' s Anunnaki bl ood was so advanced t hat i t was sai d t hat hi s br ot her Abel ' s
bl ood was ' Ear t hbound' by compar i son. Cai n, i t was sai d i n t he scr i pt ur es, ' r ose
f ar above Abel ' , so t hat hi s br ot her ' s bl ood was swal l owed i nt o t he gr ound. But
t hi s or i gi nal descr i pt i on was t hor oughl y mi st r ansl at ed f or our moder n Bi bl e, and
we ar e now t ol d t hat ' Cai n r ose up agai nst Abel and spi l l ed hi s bl ood upon t he
gr ound' . Thi s i s not t he same t hi ng at al l .

We can now pr ogr ess our st or y by consi der i ng t he ol dest Gr ant of Ar ms i n
sover ei gn hi st or y - a Gr ant of Ar ms whi ch denot ed t he Messi ani c Dr agon Bl oodl i ne
f or al l t i me. The Sumer i ans r ef er r ed t o t hi s i nsi gni a as t he Gr a- al . Sounds
f ami l i ar , doesn' t i t ? Fr ombi bl i cal hi st or y, however , we know i t bet t er as t he
' Mar k of Cai n' .

Thi s ' Mar k' i s por t r ayed t o us by t he Chur ch as i f i t wer e some f or mof cur se.
But , knowi ng what we now know, t he Bi bl e does not act ual l y say t hi s. What i t
says i s t hat , havi ng got i nt o an ar gument wi t h J ehovah over a mat t er of
sover ei gn obser vance, Cai n f ear ed f or hi s l i f e. We ar e t hen i nf or med t hat t he
Lor d pl aced a mar k upon Cai n, swear i ng sevenf ol d vengeance agai nst hi s enemi es.

No one has ever r eal l y under st ood why J ehovah shoul d deci de t o pr ot ect Cai n when
i t was he who hel d t he gr i evance agai nst hi m. But t he f act i s t hat J ehovah di d
not make t hi s deci si on. Cai n' s pr ot ect or was not J ehovah. As st at ed, t he ' Mar k'
was set t l ed upon Cai n by t he Lor d - and t he Lor d ( t he Adon) was Cai n' s own
Fat her , Enki .

Few peopl e ever t hi nk t o enqui r e about t he supposed enemi es of Cai n as def i ned
i n Genesi s. Who coul d t hey possi bl y have been? Wher e woul d t hey have come f r om?
Accor di ng t o t he Bi bl e, onl y Adamand Eve, wi t h t hei r sons Cai n and Abel ,
exi st ed - and Cai n had appar ent l y ki l l ed Abel . I f we ar e t o accept t he t ext as
i t st ands, t her e was no one ar ound t o be hi s enemy!

So, what was t hi s Sumer i an Gr a- al whi ch t he Bi bl e cal l s ' t he Mar k of Cai n' ? I t
was an embl emdi gni f i ed as t he ' Cup of t he Wat er s' or t he Rosi - Cr uci s ( t he ' Dew
Cup' ) , and i t was i dent i f i ed i n al l r ecor ds ( i ncl udi ng t hose of Egypt and
Phoeni ci a and i n t he Hebr ew annal s) as bei ng an upr i ght , cent r ed r ed cr oss
wi t hi n a ci r cl e. Thr oughout t he ages i t was devel oped and embel l i shed, but i t
has al ways r emai ned essent i al l y t he same and i s r ecogni sed as bei ng t he or i gi nal
symbol of t he Hol y Gr ai l .

Anot her anomal y i s pr esent ed soon af t er war ds i n Genesi s when we ar e t ol d t hat
Cai n f ound hi msel f a wi f e. Who on Ear t h wer e her par ent s i f Adamand Eve wer e
t he onl y coupl e al i ve? Wi t hout conf r ont i ng t hi s anomal y at al l , Genesi s t hen
pr oceeds t o l i st f or us t he names of Cai n' s descendant s!

I t becomes cl ear f r omal l of t hi s t hat some ver y i mpor t ant i nf or mat i on has been
edi t ed f r omt he Ol d Test ament nar r at i ve. Cl ear l y t her e wer e pl ent y of ot her
peopl e ar ound at t he t i me and i t i s not di f f i cul t t o f i nd t hei r st or i es out si de
t he Bi bl e. Qui t e apar t f r omt he Sumer i an annal s, even ol d Hebr ew and ear l y
Chr i st i an t ext s gi ve us f ar mor e i nf or mat i on i n t hi s r egar d.

I n or der t o f ur t her enhance t he successi on f r omCai n, he was mar r i ed t o hi s
hal f - si st er - a pur e- br ed Anunnaki pr i ncess, Lul uwa. Her f at her was Enki and her
mot her was Li l i t h, a gr anddaught er of Enl i l . Al t hough not gi vi ng t he name of
Cai n' s wi f e, t he Bi bl e does name t hei r younger son Enoch, whi l e t he Sumer i an
r ecor ds ci t e hi s el der son and ki ngl y successor , At n, who i s per haps bet t er
known as Ki ng Et ana of Ki sh.

Et ana was sai d t o have ' wal ked wi t h t he gods' , and t o have been f ed f r omt he
' Pl ant of Bi r t h' ( or t he ' Tr ee of Li f e' , as i t i s cal l ed i n Genesi s) .
Hencef or t h, t he ki ngs of t he l i ne wer e desi gnat ed as bei ng t he t wi gs of t he Tr ee
- and t he anci ent wor d f or ' t wi g' was kl one ( cl one) . I n l at er t i mes t hi s ' Pl ant '
or ' Tr ee' was r edef i ned as a ' Vi ne' , and so t he Gr a- al , t he Vi ne and t he
Messi ani c Bl oodl i ne became conj oi ned as one i n t he l i t er at ur e of subsequent
ages.

By vi r t ue of t hei r cont r i ved br eedi ng, t hi s ki ngl y successi on was model l ed
speci f i cal l y f or l eader shi p, and i n al l aspect s of knowl edge, cul t ur e,
awar eness, wi sdomand i nt ui t i on t hey wer e hi ghl y advanced agai nst t hei r mundane
cont empor ar i es. I n or der t o keep t hei r bl ood as pur e as possi bl e, t hey al ways
mar r i ed wi t hi n a cl ose ki nshi p.

I t was f ul l y r ecogni sed t hat t he pr omi nent gene of t he successi on was car r i ed
wi t hi n t he bl ood of t he mot her . Today we cal l t hi s t he ' mi t ochondr i al DNA' . And
so was bor n a t r adi t i on i nher i t ed by t hei r ki ngl y descendant s i n Egypt and by
t he l at er Cel t i c r ul er s of Eur ope. Tr ue ki ngshi p, i t was mai nt ai ned, was
t r ansf er r ed t hr ough t he f emal e, and so ki ngl y mar r i ages wer e st r at egi cal l y
cement ed wi t h mat er nal hal f - si st er s or f i r st cousi ns.

Havi ng r eached t he poi nt wher e t he Pl ant of Bi r t h i s f i r st ment i oned i n t he
r ecor ds, we ar e at about 3500 BC; and i t i s at t hi s poi nt t hat we begi n t o l ear n
how t he ki ngl y successi on was or al l y f ed wi t h bodi l y suppl ement s f r omt he ear l y
days. Thi s pr act i ce cont i nued f or mor e t han 1, 000 year s unt i l t he nour i shment
pr ogr ambecame whol l y sci ent i f i c and al chemi cal .

Bef or e get t i ng i nt o t he det ai l of t he ki ngl y di et , i t i s wor t h consi der i ng why
i t was t hat t he al l - i mpor t ant Royal Bl oodl i ne whi ch pr ogr essed f r omCai n and hi s
sons was st r at egi cal l y i gnor ed by t he Hebr ews and t he Chr i st i an Chur ch i n f avour
of t hei r pr omot i ng a par al l el j uni or l i ne f r omAdam' s son Set h. Why was i t t hat
t he i mmedi at e Cai ni t e dynast y was event ual l y shunned by t he f ear f ul di sci pl es of
Enl i l - J ehovah?

I n t he Ol d Test ament Book of Genesi s, t he l i nes of descent ar e gi ven f r omCai n
and f r omhi s hal f - br ot her Set h, but i t i s of i nt er est t o not e t hat t hr ough t he
ear l y gener at i ons t he names det ai l ed i n each l i st ar e pr et t y much t he same,
al t hough gi ven i n a di f f er ent or der : Enoch, Yar ed, Mahal al eel , Met husel ah and
Lamech.

I n vi ew of t hi s, i t has of t en been suggest ed t hat t he l i ne f r omSet h down t o
Lamech' s son Noah was ( not ver y cl ever l y) cont r i ved by t he Bi bl e compi l er s so as
t o avoi d showi ng t he t r ue descent f r omCai n t o t he t i me of Noah. I f t hi s wer e
t he case, t hen somet hi ng must have occur r ed dur i ng t he l i f et i me of Noah t o cause
t he ancest r al st or y t o be vei l ed by t he l at er wr i t er s. The answer i s t o be f ound
i n t he Bi bl e i t sel f .

At t hat st age i n t he f ami l y' s hi st or y, t he vengef ul J ehovah appar ent l y war ned
Noah and hi s sons agai nst t he i ngest i on of bl ood - an edi ct whi ch became
expr essl y i mpor t ant t o t he l at er J ewi sh way of l i f e. I t has l ong been a
cust omar y J ewi sh pr act i ce t o hang meat f or bl ood- l et t i ng bef or e cooki ng and
consumpt i on.

But , i n cont r ast , t he Chr i st i an f ai t h i s especi al l y concer ned wi t h t he
f i gur at i ve i ngest i on of bl ood. I n t he Chr i st i an t r adi t i on i t i s cust omar y t o
t ake t he Communi on sacr ament ( t he Mass) wher ei n wi ne i s dr unk f r omt he sacr ed
chal i ce, symbol i cal l y r epr esent i ng t he bl ood of J esus, t he l i f ebl ood of t he
Messi ani c Vi ne.

Coul d i t be, per haps, t hat t he moder n Chr i st i an cust omi s an unwi t t i ng t hr ow-
back t o some di st ant pr e- Noah r i t ual whi ch J ehovah opposed? I f so, t hen si nce i t
i s known t hat t he chal i ce i s a whol l y f emal e symbol whi ch has been embl emat i c of
t he womb f r omt he ear l i est t i mes, mi ght t hi s even have been an ext r act of
menst r ual bl ood? The answer t o t hese quest i ons i s ' Yes' . That was pr eci sel y t he
cust om, but i t was not so unsavour y as i t mi ght seem. I ndeed, f ew of us t hi nk t o
enqui r e about t he ul t i mat e sour ces of many of t oday' s i ngest ed medi ci nes and
bodi l y suppl ement s, and t hose i n t he know woul d of t en be r el uct ant t o t el l us.
The Pr emar i n hor mone, f or exampl e, comes f r omt he ur i ne of pr egnant mar es, whi l e
cer t ai n gr owt h hor mones and i nsul i n ar e manuf act ur ed f r omE. col i , a f aecal
bact er i um.

The bl ood ext r act i n quest i on was, i n t he f i r st i nst ance, not human but f r omt he
sacr ed Anunnaki l unar essence - t hat of Enki ' s si st er Ni n- khur sag, t he
desi gnat ed Lady of Li f e. I t was def i ned as t he most pot ent of al l l i f e- f or ces
and was vener at ed as bei ng ' St ar Fi r e' . I t was f r omt he womb of Ni n- khur sag t hat
t he ki ngl y l i ne was bor n, and i t was wi t h her bl ood, t he di vi ne St ar Fi r e, t hat
t he Dr agon successi on was suppl ement al l y f ed.

I n anci ent Egypt , Ni n- khur sag was cal l ed ' I si s' , and by ei t her name she was t he
ul t i mat e Mot her of t he Messi ani c l i ne, f or her s was t he mat r i ar chal gene whi ch
const i t ut ed t he ' Begi nni ng' , t he ' Gene- I si s' , or , as t he Gr eeks i dent i f i ed i t ,
t he Genesi s.

I t i s wor t h r emi ndi ng our sel ves, t hen, t hat t he bi bl i cal edi ct t o abst ai n f r om
bl ood came not f r omEnki t he Wi se but f r omEnl i l - J ehovah - t he God of Wr at h who
had i nst i gat ed t he Fl ood, had wr ought havoc i n Ur and Babyl on, and had
endeavour ed t o decei ve Adamby sayi ng t hat he woul d di e i f he at e f r omt he Tr ee
of Knowl edge. Thi s was not a god who l i ked peopl e, and t he Sumer i an r ecor ds ar e
ver y cl ear i n t hi s r egar d. Hence, i f he f or bade t he t aki ng of bl ood, t hi s was
not l i kel y t o have been an edi ct f or t he benef i t of Noah and hi s descendant s -
i t was most pr obabl y t o t hei r det r i ment .

I n st r i ct t er ms t he or i gi nal St ar Fi r e was t he l unar essence of t he Goddess,
but , even i n an ever yday mundane envi r onment , menst r uumcont ai ns t he most
val uabl e endocr i nal secr et i ons, especi al l y t hose of t he pi neal and pi t ui t ar y
gl ands. The br ai n' s pi neal gl and i n par t i cul ar was di r ect l y associ at ed wi t h t he
Tr ee of Li f e, f or t hi s t i ny gl and was sai d t o secr et e t he ver y essence of act i ve
l ongevi t y, cal l ed soma, or , as t he Gr eeks cal l ed i t , ambr osi a.

I n myst i c ci r cl es, t he menst r ual ' f l ow- er ' ( ' she who f l ows' ) has l ong been t he
desi gnat ed ' f l ower ' and i s r epr esent ed as a l i l y or a l ot us. I ndeed, t he
def i ni t i on ' f l ow- er ' i s t he ver y r oot of our moder n wor d ' f l ower ' . I n anci ent
Sumer , t he key f emal es of t he Dr agon successi on wer e al l vener at ed as l i l i es,
havi ng such names as Li l i , Lul uwa, Li l i t h, Li l ut u and Li l l et t e.

I n pi ct or i al r epr esent at i on, t he Messi ani c Dr agon bor e l i t t l e r el at i on t o t he
wi nged, f i r e- br eat hi ng beast of l at er West er n myt hol ogy. I t was, i n essence, a
l ar ge- j awed ser pent wi t h f our l egs, ver y much l i ke a cr ocodi l e or a moni t or .
Thi s was t he sacr ed Messeh whose name was ' Dr aco' . Dr aco was a di vi ne embl emof
t he Egypt i an Phar aohs, a symbol of t he Egypt i an Ther apeut at e, of t he Essenes at
Qumr an, and was t he Bi st ea Nept uni s ( t he sea ser pent ) of t he descendant
Mer ovi ngi an Fi sher - Ki ngs i n Eur ope.

I n t he ol d Hebr ew Bi bl es, al l r ef er ences t o ser pent s ar e made by use of t he wor d
nahash ( f r omt he st emNHSH) ; but t hi s usage does not r el at e t o ser pent s i n t he
way t hat we woul d know t hem- t hat i s, as venomous snakes. I t r el at es t o
ser pent s i n t hei r t r adi t i onal capaci t y as br i nger s of wi sdomand enl i ght enment ,
f or t he wor d nahash act ual l y means ' t o deci pher ' or ' t o f i nd out ' .

Ser pent s, i n one f or mor anot her , wer e al ways associ at ed wi t h wi sdomand
heal i ng, and t he Tr ees of Li f e and Knowl edge ar e cust omar i l y i dent i f i ed wi t h
ser pent s. I ndeed, t he i nsi gni a of many of t oday' s medi cal associ at i ons i s
pr eci sel y t hi s i mage of a ser pent coi l ed ar ound t he Pl ant of Bi r t h ( Tr ee of
Li f e) - a depi ct i on shown i n t he cl ay r el i ef s of anci ent Sumer t o be Enki ' s
per sonal embl em.

I nt er est i ngl y, t hough, anot her common embl emf or medi cal r el i ef or gani sat i ons
depi ct s t wo coi l ed ser pent s, spi r al l i ng ar ound t he wi nged caduceus of Her mes t he
magi ci an. I n t hese i nst ances t he t r ue symbol i smof t he St ar Fi r e r i t ual i s
conveyed, and t hi s symbol can be t r aced back t o t he ver y or i gi ns of t he
al chemi cal myst er y school s and gnost i c i nst i t ut i ons.

The r ecor ds expl ai n t hat t he cent r al st af f and ent wi ned ser pent s r epr esent t he
spi nal cor d and t he sensor y ner vous syst em. The t wo upper most wi ngs si gni f y t he
br ai n' s l at er al vent r i cul ar st r uct ur es. Bet ween t hese wi ngs, above t he spi nal
col umn, i s shown t he smal l cent r al node of t he pi neal gl and.

The combi nat i on of t he cent r al pi neal and i t s l at er al wi ngs has l ong been
r ef er r ed t o as t he ' Swan' , and i n Gr ai l l or e ( as i n some yogi c ci r cl es) t he Swan
i s embl emat i c of t he f ul l y enl i ght ened bei ng. Thi s i s t he ul t i mat e r eal mof
consci ousness achi eved by t he medi aeval Kni ght s of t he Swan, as epi t omi sed by
such chi val r i c f i gur es as Per ceval and Lohengr i n.

Most of you ar e pr obabl y qui t e f ami l i ar wi t h t he f unct i ons of t he pi neal and
ot her gl ands of t he endocr i nal syst em. But f or t hose who ar e per haps not , t he
pi neal i s a ver y smal l gl and, shaped l i ke a pi ne cone and about t he si ze of a
gr ai n of cor n. I t i s cent r al l y si t uat ed wi t hi n t he br ai n, al t hough out si de t he
vent r i cl es and not f or mi ng a par t of t he br ai n- mat t er as such.

The pi neal gl and was t hought by t he 17t h- cent ur y Fr ench opt i cal sci ent i st Ren
Descar t es t o be t he seat of t he soul - t he poi nt at whi ch t he mi nd and body ar e
conj oi ned. The anci ent Gr eeks consi der ed i t l i kewi se, and i n t he 4t h cent ur y BC
Her ophi l us descr i bed t he pi neal as an or gan whi ch r egul at ed t he f l ow of t hought .
Thi s gl and has l ong i nt r i gued anat omi st s because, whi l e t he r est of t he br ai n i s
' doubl e' , t he pi neal has no count er par t .

I n t he days of anci ent Sumer , t he pr i est s of Anu ( t he f at her of Enl i l and Enki )
per f ect ed and el abor at ed a r ami f yi ng medi cal sci ence of l i vi ng subst ances, wi t h
menst r ual St ar Fi r e bei ng an essent i al sour ce component . I n t he f i r st i nst ance,
t hi s was pur e Anunnaki l unar essence cal l ed ' Gol d of t he Gods' , and i t was f ed
onl y t o t he Ki ngs and Queens of t he Dr agon successi on. Lat er , however , i n Egypt
and Medi t er r anea, menst r ual St ar Fi r e was r i t ual l y col l ect ed f r omsacr ed vi r gi n
pr i est esses who wer e vener at ed as ' Scar l et Women' . I ndeed, t he ver y wor d
' r i t ual ' st ems f r omt hi s pr act i ce, and f r omt he wor d r i t u - whi ch def i ned t he
sacr ed cer emony of t he ' Red Gol d' .

Endocr i nal suppl ement s ar e, of cour se, st i l l used by t oday' s or ganot her apy
est abl i shment , but t hei r i nher ent secr et i ons ( such as mel at oni n and ser ot oni n)
ar e obt ai ned f r omt he dessi cat ed gl ands of dead ani mal s and t hey l ack t he t r ul y
i mpor t ant el ement s whi ch exi st onl y i n l i ve human gl andul ar manuf act ur e.

I n t he f i r e symbol i smof anci ent al chemy, t he col our ' r ed' i s synonymous wi t h
t he met al ' gol d' . I n some t r adi t i ons ( i ncl udi ng t he I ndi an t ant r as) , ' r ed' i s
al so i dent i f i abl e wi t h ' bl ack' . Hence, t he goddess Kal i i s sai d t o be bot h ' r ed'
and ' bl ack' . The or i gi nal her i t age of Kal i was, however , Sumer i an, and she was
sai d t o be Kal i mt h, t he si st er of Cai n' s wi f e Lul uwa.

Kal i was a pr i mar y pr i ncess of t he Dr agon House, and f r omher St ar Fi r e
associ at i on she became t he goddess of t i me, seasons, per i ods and cycl es. Because
of t hi s, her name was t he r oot of t he wor d ' cal endar ' ( kal i ndar ) , whi ch i s
concer ned wi t h t he di vi si ons of seasonal t i me.

I n t he ear l y days, t her ef or e, t he met al s of t he al chemi st s wer e not common
met al s but l i vi ng essences, and t he anci ent myst er i es wer e of a physi cal , not a
met aphysi cal , nat ur e. I ndeed, t he ver y wor d ' secr et ' has i t s or i gi n i n t he
hi dden knowl edge of gl andul ar secr et i ons. Tr ut h was t he r i t u ( t he ' r edness' or
' bl ackness' ) , and f r omt he wor d r i t u st ems not onl y r i t ual but al so t he wor ds
' r i t e' , ' r oot ' and ' r ed' . The r i t u, i t was sai d, r eveal s i t sel f as physi cal
mat t er i n t he f or mof t he pur est and most nobl e of al l met al s: gol d. Hence, gol d
was deemed an ' ul t i mat e t r ut h' .

J ust as t he wor d ' secr et ' has i t s or i gi n i n t he t r ansl at i on of an anci ent wor d,
so t oo do ot her r el at ed wor ds have t hei r si mi l ar bases. I n anci ent Egypt , t he
wor d Amen was used t o si gni f y somet hi ng hi dden or conceal ed. The wor d ' occul t '
meant pr et t y much t he same ( ' hi dden f r omvi ew' ) , and yet t oday we use ' Amen' t o
concl ude hymns, whi l e somet hi ng ' occul t ' i s deemed si ni st er . I n r eal t er ms,
however , t hey bot h r el at e t o t he wor d ' secr et ' , and al l t hr ee wor ds wer e, at one
t i me or anot her , connect ed wi t h t he myst i c sci ence of endocr i nal secr et i ons.

Si nce Kal i was associ at ed wi t h ' bl ack' ( bei ng ' bl ack but beaut i f ul ' ) , t he
Engl i sh wor d ' coal ' ( denot i ng ' t hat whi ch i s bl ack' ) st ems al so f r omher name
vi a t he i nt er medi at e wor d kol . I n t he Hebr ew t r adi t i on, Bat h- Kol ( a Kal i
count er par t ) was cal l ed t he ' Daught er of t he Voi ce' , and t he voi ce was sai d t o
or i gi nat e dur i ng a f emal e' s puber t y. Hence, t he womb was associ at ed wi t h t he
voi ce, and St ar Fi r e was sai d t o be t he or acul ar ' Wor d of t he Womb' . The womb
was, t her ef or e, i t sel f t he ' ut t er er ' , or t he ' ut er us' .

The ' Scar l et Women' wer e so cal l ed because of t hei r bei ng a di r ect sour ce of t he
pr i est l y St ar Fi r e. They wer e known i n Gr eek as t he Hi er odul ai ( ' Sacr ed Women' )
- a wor d l at er t r ansf or med ( vi a medi aeval Fr ench i nt o Engl i sh) t o ' har l ot ' . I n
t he ear l y Ger mani c t ongue, t hey wer e known as Hor s - whi ch was l at er Angl i ci sed
t o ' whor es' . However , t he wor d or i gi nal l y meant , qui t e si mpl y, ' Bel oved Ones' .
As poi nt ed out i n good et ymol ogi cal di ct i onar i es, t hese wor ds wer e descr i pt i ons
of hi gh vener at i on and wer e never i nt er changeabl e wi t h such wor ds as
' pr ost i t ut e' or ' adul t er ess' . Thei r now common associ at i on was, i n f act , a
whol l y cont r i ved st r at egy of t he medi aeval Roman Chur ch i n i t s bi d t o deni gr at e
t he nobl e st at us of t he sacr ed pr i est ess.

The wi t hdr awal of knowl edge of t he genui ne St ar Fi r e t r adi t i on f r omt he publ i c
domai n occur r ed when t he sci ence of t he ear l y adept s and l at er Gnost i cs ( t he
t r ue pr e- Chr i st i an Chr i st i ans) was st i f l ed by t he f or ger s of hi st or i c
Chr i st i ani t y. A cer t ai n amount of t he or i gi nal gnosi s ( or knowl edge) i s
pr eser ved i n Tal mudi c and r abbi ni cal l or e, but , gener al l y speaki ng, t he
mai nst r eamJ ews and Chr i st i ans di d al l i n t hei r power t o di st or t and dest r oy al l
t r aces of t he anci ent ar t .

I n addi t i on t o bei ng t he ' Gol d of t he Gods' , t he Anunnaki menst r uumwas al so
cal l ed t he ' Vehi cl e of Li ght ' , bei ng t he ul t i mat e sour ce of mani f est at i on, and
i n t hi s r egar d i t was di r ect l y equat ed wi t h t he myst i cal ' Wat er s of Cr eat i on' -
t he f l ow of et er nal wi sdom. I t was f or t hi s r eason t hat t he Rosi - Cr uci s ( t he Dew
Cup, or Cup of t he Wat er s i dent i f i ed as a r ed cr oss wi t hi n a ci r cl e) became t he
Mar k of Cai n, and t he subsequent embl emof t he ki ngl y successi on.

I t was sai d t hat t he Li ght r emai ned qui t e dor mant i n a spi r i t ual l y unawakened
per son but t hat i t coul d be awakened and mot i vat ed by t he spi r i t ual ener gy of
sel f - wi l l , and by const ant sel f - enqui r y. Thi s i s not an obvi ous ment al pr ocess,
but a t r ul y t hought - f r ee consci ousness - a f or ml ess pl ane of pur e Bei ng.

I t was t hi s ver y concept of ' bei ng' or ' sel f - compl et eness' whi ch posed t he
ul t i mat e pr obl emf or Enl i l - J ehovah. I n cont r ast , hi s br ot her Enki knew t hat
humans who par t ook of t he Tr ee of Knowl edge ( t he Anunnaki wi sdom) and of t he
Pl ant of Bi r t h ( t he Anunnaki St ar Fi r e) coul d t hemsel ves become al most l i ke
gods. Even J ehovah was sai d t o have r ecogni sed t hi s, and Genesi s st at es t hat
when Adamhad t aken t he f r ui t of t he Tr ee, J ehovah sai d, " Behol d, t he man i s
become as one of Us" .

Enki t he Wi se, Guar di an of t he Tr ee of Knowl edge, al so had anot her name i n t he
Hebr ew t r adi t i on. They cal l ed hi mSamael ( Sama- El ) because he was t he desi gnat ed
Lor d of Sama i n nor t her n Mesopot ami a. The t eachi ngs of t he ear l y myst er y- school s
wer e ver y speci f i c about t he Tr ees of Li f e and Knowl edge, and t hey emul at ed t he
ver y t eachi ngs of Enki hi msel f . I t was sai d: Not hi ng i s obt ai ned si mpl y by
want i ng. And not hi ng i s achi eved by r el i nqui shi ng r esponsi bi l i t y t o a hi gher
aut hor i t y. Bel i ef i s t he act of ' bel i vi ng' , f or t o ' be l i ve' i s t o ' bel i eve' -
and Wi l l i s t he ul t i mat e medi umof t he Sel f .

The Sumer i an r ecor ds r el at e t hat Cai n' s son, Ki ng Et ana, par t ook of t he Pl ant of
Bi r t h i n or der t o f at her hi s own son and hei r , Ki ng Baal i - and t he Pl ant of
Bi r t h was di r ect l y associ at ed wi t h i ndi vi dual l ongevi t y and t he of f i ce of
Cai nshi p, or Ki ngshi p. I t was i t sel f r el at ed t o St ar Fi r e and t o pi neal gl and
act i vi t y, and par t aki ng of t he Pl ant of Bi r t h was t he r i t ual of i ngest i ng t he
St ar Fi r e - t he pur e Anunnaki f emal e essence, t he Nect ar of Supr eme Excel l ence.

I n t hi s r egar d, t he Anunnaki ' f l ow- er ' ( f l ower or l i l y) was hel d t o be t he Cup-
bear er , t he t r ansmi t t er of t he Ri ch Food of t he Mat r i x. I n t hi s capaci t y, she
was cal l ed t he Rose of Shar on ( f r omt he wor d Sha, meani ng ' Or bi t ' , al ong wi t h
t he wor ds Ra and On, r el at i ng t o t he ul t i mat e t empl e of ' Li ght ' ) . The
si gni f i cance of t hi s hi ghl y vener at ed st at i on i s act ual l y made appar ent i n t he
Bi bl e' s esot er i c Song of Sol omon wher ei n t he Messi ani c Br i de pr ocl ai ms t o t he
Ki ng, " I amt he Rose of Shar on and t he Li l y of t he val l eys" .

A St ar Fi r e r eci pi ent Ki ng was consi der ed t o have become qual i f i ed f or Ki ngshi p
when he r eached a pr e- dest i ned st at e of enl i ght ened consci ousness - a st at e when
hi s apt i t udes f or wi sdomand l eader shi p had been enhanced t o a r eal mof Ki ngshi p
cal l ed t he Mal k. I t was f r omt hi s Mesopot ami an wor d Mal k t hat t he Hebr ews
der i ved t hei r wor ds Mal chus ( Ki ng) and Mal khut ( Ki ngdom) .

Onl y i n ver y r ecent t i mes have medi cal sci ent i st s i dent i f i ed t he hor monal
secr et i on of t he pi neal gl and, f i nal l y i sol at i ng i t i n 1968. The essence was
cal l ed mel at oni n, whi ch means ' ni ght wor ker ' ( f r omt he Gr eek, mel os, meani ng
' bl ack' , and t osos, meani ng ' l abour ' ) . Those wi t h a hi gh mel at oni n out put r eact
st r ongl y agai nst sunl i ght because i t af f ect s t hei r ment al capabi l i t y; t hey ar e
essent i al l y ni ght oper at i ves. Mel at oni n i s cal l ed t he ' hor mone of dar kness' as
i t i s pr oduced onl y at ni ght or i n t he dar k. Exposur e t o an excess of sunl i ght
act ual l y makes t he pi neal gl and smal l er and l essens spi r i t ual awar eness, wher eas
dar kness and hi gh pi neal act i vi t y enhance t he keen i nt ui t i ve knowl edge of t he
subt l e mi nd whi l e r educi ng t he st r ess f act or .

At t hi s st age, i t i s of i nt er est t o not e how i t was t hat t he Chr i st i an Chur ch
event ual l y demol i shed t he t r ue si gni f i cance of t he St ar Fi r e r i t ual by
manoeuvr i ng i t i nt o t he r eal mof si ni st er Got hi c l egend. I n t he ol d t r adi t i on,
t he ul t i mat e hol der s of t he Mal khut wer e known as Dr agons or Pendr agons, and t he
r ei gni ng head was al ways known as Dr aco.

By vi r t ue of t hei r bodi l y condi t i oni ng t hr ough suppl ement ar y mel at oni n and ot her
hor monal secr et i ons, t hey wer e i n f act Pr i nces of Dar kness; and t hey gai ned
t hei r hei ght ened awar eness, above- nor mal power s and l ongevi t y f r omt he St ar Fi r e
- t he l unar bl ood of t he Anunnaki Queens and t he pr i est l y Scar l et Women.

As det ai l ed i n Bl oodl i ne of t he Hol y Gr ai l , t he br ut al Cat hol i c I nqui si t i ons of
t he Mi ddl e Ages wer e set agai nst al l t he so- cal l ed her et i cs who i n one way or
anot her suppor t ed t he Messi ani c Bl ood Royal ( t he Sangr al ) of t he Dr agon Ki ngs
agai nst t he cor r upt ed dogma of t he bi shops. Many of t he vi ct i ms wer e cl assi f i ed
as occul t i st s and wi t ches, and t hey wer e char ged wi t h uphol di ng t he anci ent and
her et i cal cul t of Dr aco, t he Pr i nce of Dar kness. They wer e pr ocl ai med by t he
Chur ch aut hor i t i es t o be vampi r es!

I pr evi ousl y ment i oned t he si gni f i cance of t he anci ent Egypt i an Cour t of t he
Dr agon, poi nt i ng out t hat af t er some 4, 000 year s t hi s Sover ei gn Or der i s st i l l
oper at i ve t oday. Back i n t he 15t h cent ur y, a pr omi nent Chancel l or of t he Cour t
was Pr i nce Vl ad I I I of Tr ansyl vani a- Wal l achi a, who bui l t t he ci t adel of
Buchar est . Vl ad i s per haps bet t er r emember ed, however , as Count Dr acul a, meani ng
' son of Dr acul ' - a name by whi ch hi s f at her was known wi t hi n t he Cour t f r om
1431.

Vl ad was a pr i nce of har sh di sci pl i nes, and hi s met hod of execut i on f or cr i mes
agai nst t he st at e was i mpal ement upon wooden st akes. Thi s was qui t e compat i bl e
wi t h ot her hi deous puni shment s of t he t i me ( boi l i ng i n oi l , bur ni ng at t he
st ake, dr awi ng and quar t er i ng, et c. ) . But Vl ad' s par t i cul ar met hod became
r ever sed agai nst hi mi n a l at er Got hi c- novel t r adi t i on whi ch cl ai med t hat
Dr acul a shoul d be ki l l ed by i mpal ement wi t h a wooden st ake.

The est abl i shment ' s r eal f ear of Dr acul a, however , was not hi s savage t r eat ment
of enemi es ( such t hi ngs wer e commonpl ace i n t hei r day) , but hi s i n- dept h
knowl edge of al chemy and t he anci ent St ar Fi r e cust oms. Havi ng at t ended t he
Aust r i an School of Sol omon i n Her mannst adt , he had an i n- dept h sci ent i f i c
under st andi ng of t he bodi l y ef f ect s of mel at oni n and ser ot oni n whi ch enhance
l ongevi t y and i ncr ease consci ousness.

Cl ear l y, as t he Romani an annal s det er mi ne, he was a hi gh mel at oni n pr oducer ,
and, as we have seen, such peopl e ar e adver sel y af f ect ed by sunl i ght . They ar e
ni ght wor ker s ( mel os t osos) . Consequent l y, t he Tr ansyl vani an myt h was bor n, and
i n Br amSt oker ' s novel ( publ i shed i n 1897, wi t h i t s cent enar y l ast year ) Vl ad-
Dr acul a was por t r ayed as a vampi r e - a Pr i nce of Dar kness who i mbi bed t he bl ood
of vi r gi ns!

Not wi t hst andi ng t hi s, a good deal of t r ul y ear l y f ol kl or e was act ual l y based
upon t he Gr ai l and Dr agon t r adi t i ons. The ver y concept of ' f ai r i es' ( ' f ai r
f ol k' ) was bor n di r ect l y f r omt hi s base, bei ng a der i vat i ve of f e or ' f ey' and
r el at i ng especi al l y t o ' f at e' . I n t he Cel t i c wor l d, cer t ai n r oyal f ami l i es wer e
sai d t o car r y t he ' f ai r y bl ood' - t hat i s t o say, t he f at e or dest i ny of t he
Gr ai l Bl oodl i ne - whi l e t he Gr ai l Pr i ncesses of r omance and hi st or y wer e of t en
cal l ed ' el f - mai dens' . They wer e t he desi gnat ed guar di ans of t he ear t h, st ar l i ght
and f or est , as begui l i ngl y r epl i cat ed by t he el ven r ace i n Tol ki en' s Lor d of t he
Ri ngs.

I n t he ol d l anguage of sout her n Eur ope, a f emal e el f was an yl bi , and f r omt hi s
wor d der i ved t he t own name of Al bi , t he Languedoc cent r e of t he Gnost i c Cat har s
( t he Pur e Ones) i n t he Mi ddl e Ages. When Pope I nnocent I I I l aunched hi s br ut al
t hi r t y- f i ve- year mi l i t ar y assaul t upon t he Cat har s f r om1208, hi s campai gn was
cal l ed t he ' Al bi gensi an' Cr usade because i t was set agai nst t he suppor t er s of
t he al bi - gens ( ' el ven bl ood' ) .

Mel at oni n enhances and boost s t he body' s i mmune syst em, and t hose wi t h hi gh
pi neal secr et i on ar e l ess l i kel y t o devel op cancer ous di seases. Hi gh mel at oni n
pr oduct i on hei ght ens ener gy, st ami na and physi cal t ol er ance l evel s and i t i s
di r ect l y r el at ed t o sl eep pat t er ns, keepi ng t he body t emper at el y r egul at ed wi t h
pr oper t i es t hat oper at e t hr ough t he car di ovascul ar syst em. I t i s, i n f act , t he
body' s most pot ent and ef f ect i ve ant i oxi dant and i t has posi t i ve ment al and
physi cal ant i - agei ng pr oper t i es. I t i s manuf act ur ed by t he pi neal gl and t hr ough
t he act i vat i on of a chemi cal messenger cal l ed ser ot oni n. Thi s t r ansmi t s ner ve
i mpul ses acr oss chr omosome pai r s at a poi nt when t he cel l nucl ei ar e di vi ded and
t he chr omosomes ar e hal ved ( a pr ocess cal l ed mei osi s) , event ual l y t o be combi ned
wi t h ot her hal f - set s upon f er t i l i sat i on.

Pi ne r esi n was l ong i dent i f i ed wi t h pi neal secr et i on and was used t o make
f r anki ncense ( t he i ncense of pr i est hood) . Gol d, on t he ot her hand, was a
t r adi t i onal symbol of ki ngshi p. Hence, gol d and f r anki ncense wer e t he
t r adi t i onal subst ances of t he Pr i est - Ki ngs of t he Messi ani c Bl oodl i ne, al ong
wi t h myr r h ( a gumr esi n used as a medi cal sedat i ve) whi ch was symbol i c of deat h.

I n t he anci ent wor l d, hi gher knowl edge was i dent i f i ed as dat h ( f r omwhi ch comes
our wor d, ' deat h' ) . I n f act , as we know ver y wel l , t he New Test ament descr i bes
t hat t hese t hr ee subst ances ( gol d, f r anki ncense and myr r h) wer e pr esent ed t o
J esus by t he Magi , t her eby i dent i f yi ng hi mbeyond doubt as an her edi t ar y Pr i est -
Ki ng of t he Dr agon successi on.

Yoga t eacher s suggest t hat t he pi neal gl and ( whi ch t hey cal l t he ' t hi r d eye' or
' eye of wi sdom' ) i s si gni f i cant i n t he pr ocess of becomi ng ' awar e' , f or i t i s
t he ul t i mat e sour ce of t he Li ght . I l l umi ni st s and ot her Rosi cr uci an adept s have
l ong r ef er r ed t o t he pi neal as t he secr et ayi n - an anci ent wor d f or ' eye' . Thi s
spel l i ng ( a- y- i - n) i s act ual l y qui t e i mpor t ant because t he or i gi nal spel l i ng of
Cai n ( whet her wi t h a ' C' , a ' K' or a ' Q' ) was not ' C- a- i - n' as we now know i t ,
but ' C- a- y- i - n' . The name Cai n, i n i t s var i ous f or ms, act ual l y denot ed One of
t he I nner Eye. Hence, f r omKayi n wi t h a ' K' der i ved t he wor d ' Ki ng' , and f r om
Qayi n wi t h a ' Q' der i ved t he wor d ' Queen' . I ndeed, Cai n' s f at her Enki - Samael was
hi msel f t he Sumer i ans' desi gnat ed Lor d of t he Sacr ed Eye.

I t i s sai d t hat a t r ul y spi r i t ual per son can aut omat i cal l y per cei ve wi t h t he
t hi r d eye ( t he subt l e eye of i nsi ght ) , r at her t han be duped by mundane eyes
whi ch r eveal onl y physi cal pr esences. Such pr esences ar e def i ned by t hei r pl ace
wi t hi n ar bi t r ar y t i me; but t o pi neal gr aduat es t her e i s no t i me t o cal cul at e,
f or t hey l i ve i n a di mensi on wher e t i me and space ar e of no consequence. Thi s
di mensi on i s not a new di scover y of moder n sci ence: i t was known about t housands
of year s ago as t he Pl ane of Shar on, t he Pl ane of t he Or bi t of Li ght .

And so t he Cai ni t e Ki ngs of Mesopot ami a ( t he f i r st Pendr agons of t he Messi ani c
Bl oodl i ne) whi l e al r eady bei ng of hi gh Anunnaki subst ance wer e f ed wi t h f ur t her
Anunnaki St ar Fi r e t o i ncr ease t hei r per cept i on, awar eness and i nt ui t i on so t hat
t hey became mast er s of knowi ngness, al most l i ke gods t hemsel ves. At t he same
t i me t hei r st ami na l evel s and i mmune syst ems wer e dr amat i cal l y st r engt hened so
t hat t he ant i - agei ng pr oper t i es of t he r egul ar l y i ngest ed Anunnaki mel at oni n and
ser ot oni n f aci l i t at ed ext r aor di nar y l i f e- spans. Al l r ecor ds of t he er a conf i r m
t hat t hi s was t he case, wi t h t hose of t he ki ngl y l i ne l i vi ng f or hundr eds of
year s. And i n t hi s r egar d t her e i s no r eason t o be over - scept i cal about t he
gr eat ages of t he ear l y pat r i ar chs as gi ven i n t he Book of Genesi s.

I n addi t i on t o t he St ar Fi r e r i t ual , t he Bl oodl i ne Ki ngs wer e al so sai d t o have
been nour i shed wi t h t he Mi l k of t he Goddess, and i t woul d appear t hat t hi s
' mi l k' cont ai ned an enzyme t hat was i t sel f conduci ve t o act i ve l ongevi t y.
Today' s genet i c r esear cher s cal l t hi s enzyme t el omer ase. As r ecent l y r epor t ed i n
t he j our nal Sci ence [ vol . 279, 16 J anuar y 1998] , cor por at e st udi es and t hose of
t he Uni ver si t y of Texas Sout hwest er n Medi cal Cent er have det er mi ned t hat
t el omer ase has uni que ant i - agei ng pr oper t i es.

Heal t hy body cel l s ar e pr ogr ammed t o di vi de many t i mes dur i ng a l i f et i me, but
t hi s pr ocess of di vi si on and r epl i cat i on i s f i ni t e, so t hat a non- di vi di ng st at e
i s ul t i mat el y achi eved. Thi s i s a cr uci al f act or of agei ng. The di vi si on
pot ent i al i s cont r ol l ed by caps at t he end of DNA st r ands ( r at her l i ke t he
pl ast i c t i ps on shoel aces) . These caps ar e t he t el omer es. As each cel l di vi des,
a pi ece of t el omer e i s l ost , and t he di vi di ng pr ocess ceases when t he t el omer es
have shor t ened t o an opt i mumand cr i t i cal l engt h. Ther e i s t hen no new cel l
r epl i cat i on, and al l t hat f ol l ows i s det er i or at i on.

Labor at or y exper i ment s wi t h t i ssue sampl es have now shown t hat appl i cat i on of
t he genet i c enzyme t el omer ase can pr event t el omer e shor t eni ng upon cel l di vi si on
and r epl i cat i on. Hence, body cel l s can cont i nue t o di vi de way beyond t hei r
nat ur al l y r est r i ct ed pr ogr ammi ng ( j ust as do cancer cel l s whi ch can achi eve
i mmor t al i t y t hr ough bei ng r i ch i n t el omer ase) . Tel omer ase i s not usual l y
expr essed i n nor mal body t i ssue; but apar t f r ombei ng pr esent i n mal i gnant
t umour s, i t i s al so appar ent i n r epr oduct i ve cel l s. I t seems, t her ef or e, t hat
somewher e wi t hi n our DNA st r uct ur e i s t he genet i c abi l i t y t o pr oduce t hi s ant i -
agei ng enzyme, but t hat t he pot ent i al has somehow been swi t ched of f and pr obabl y
exi st s wi t hi n t hose aspect s of our DNA whi ch sci ent i st s cur r ent l y r ef er t o as
' j unk' .

I n t he canoni cal Bi bl e we ar e t ol d t hat , dur i ng t he l i f et i mes of Noah and hi s
sons, J ehovah i ssued t he edi ct whi ch f or bade t he i ngest i ng of bl ood - at l east
t hi s was t he t i me- f r ame appl i ed t o t he edi ct by t he Ol d Test ament compi l er s i n
t he si xt h cent ur y BC. I t i s unl i kel y, however , t hat t hi s was t he cor r ect t i me-
f r ame, f or at t hat t i me Enl i l - J ehovah woul d have had no such f i nal aut hor i t y
over Enki and t he Gr and Assembl y of t he Anunnaki .

Never t hel ess i t i s appar ent t hat , f r omt hat t i me, t he gi ven ages of t he
pat r i ar chal st r ai n begi n t o di mi ni sh qui t e consi der abl y, so t hat f r omt he days
of Abr ahamand I saac we ar e pr esent ed, i n t he mai n, wi t h r at her mor e nor mal
l i f e- spans. I n cont r ast , t hough, t he l i f e- spans of t he Sumer i an Ki ngs i n descent
f r omCai n and Et ana cont i nued at a gener al l y hi gh l evel .

What we do know beyond doubt i s t hat what ever t he r eal i t i es of t he edi ct and i t s
chr onol ogy, a maj or change i n t he St ar Fi r e pr act i ce became necessar y i n about
1960 BC. Thi s was when t he Bi bl e t el l s us t hat Abr ahamand hi s f ami l y moved
nor t hwar d f r omUr of t he Chal dees ( t he capi t al of Sumer ) t o Har an bef or e t ur ni ng
west war d i nt o Canaan.

Cont empor ar y hi st or i cal t ext s r ecor d t hat at t hat t i me Ur was sacked by t he Ki ng
of near by El amsoon af t er 2000 BC and, al t hough t he ci t y was r ebui l t , t he power
cent r e moved nor t h t o Har an i n t he Ki ngdomof Mar i . But Har an was not j ust t he
name of a f l our i shi ng ci t y; i t was t he name of Abr aham' s br ot her ( t he f at her of
Lot ) . Exi st i ng document s ( di scover ed i n 1934) al so r eveal t hat ot her ci t i es i n
Mesopot ami a wer e si mi l ar l y named i n accor dance wi t h Abr aham' s f or ebear s - ci t i es
such as Ter ah ( Abr aham' s f at her ) , Nahor ( Ter ah' s f at her ) , Ser ug ( Nahor ' s
f at her ) , and Pel eg ( Ser ug' s gr andf at her ) .

Qui t e appar ent l y, i n l i ne wi t h al l t he Sumer i an evi dence whi ch suppor t s t he
ki ngl y l i ne f r omCai n, t hese l at el y di scover ed r epor t s conf i r mt hat t he
i mmedi at e f ami l y of Abr aham( i n t he successi on af t er Noah) wer e al so gr eat
commi ssi oner s of t he r egi on i n gener al . Cl ear l y, t he Pat r i ar chs r epr esent ed no
or di nar y f ami l y but const i t ut ed a ver y power f ul dynast y. But why woul d such a
l ong- st andi ng her i t age of pr omi nence and r enown come t o an abr upt end and f or ce
Abr ahamout of Mesopot ami a i nt o Canaan?

The answer i s t o be f ound i n cl ay t abl et s whi ch can be dat ed t o about 1960 BC.
They det ai l t hat , at t hat t i me, ever yt hi ng changed i n t he hi t her t o sacr ed l and
of Sumer when i nvader s came i n f r omal l si des: Akkadi ans f r omt he nor t h,
Amor i t es f r omSyr i a, and El ami t es f r omPer si a. The t ext cont i nues:

When t hey over t hr ew, when or der t hey dest r oyed; Then l i ke a del uge al l t hi ngs
t oget her consumed. Wher eunt o, oh Sumer ! Di d t hey change t hee? The Sacr ed Dynast y
f r omt he Templ e t hey exi l ed.

I t was at t hi s st age of Sumer i an hi st or y t hat t he empi r e f el l and Abr ahamwas
f or ced t o f l ee nor t hwar d f r omt he ci t y of Ur . But what had happened t o t he
Anunnaki , t he Gr and Assembl y of Gods who had est abl i shed ever yt hi ng? The t ext
cont i nues:

Ur i s dest r oyed, bi t t er i s i t s l ament . The count r y' s bl ood now f i l l s i t s hol es
l i ke hot br onze i n a moul d. Bodi es di ssol ve l i ke f at i n t he sun. Our t empl e i s
dest r oyed. Smoke l i es on our ci t i es l i ke a shr oud. The gods have abandoned us
l i ke mi gr at i ng bi r ds.

I n hi st or i cal t er ms, t hi s t ot al col l apse of t he Sumer i an empi r e f ol l ows t he
f oundi ng of Babyl on by Ki ng Ur - Baba i n about 2000 BC. I ndeed, t he st or y of t he
Tower of Babel and t he r esul t ant wr at h of J ehovah pr eci sel y f i t s t he t i me- f r ame
of t he Sumer i ans' own abandonment by t he Anunnaki .

The st or y i n Genesi s r el at es t hat t he peopl e, who wer e hi t her t o sai d by J ehovah
t o be " ver y good" , wer e sever el y puni shed because of a st r ange t r ansgr essi on
whi ch had not pr evi ousl y been r ul ed upon. The appar ent t r ansgr essi on was t hat
t hey al l spoke t he same l anguage, and t he uni que l anguage whi ch t hey al l spoke
was, of cour se, Sumer i an - t he f i r st wr i t t en l anguage on Ear t h.

For a r eason whi ch i s not made cl ear i n t he Bi bl e, t he Genesi s t ext expl ai ns
t hat J ehovah was not happy about t he Tower of Babel and so he " di d come down,
and di d conf ound t he l anguage of al l t he Ear t h" .

The Sumer i an hi st or i cal document s t el l much t he same st or y, except t hat t he
conf oundi ng of l anguage i s f ar bet t er expl ai ned by t he hor des of f or ei gn
i nvader s who came i nt o t he r egi on. I t t r anspi r es t hat t hi s i nvasi on was t he
di r ect r esul t of f r i ct i on among t he Anunnaki , f or at Anu' s r et i r ement f r omt he
Gr and Assembl y hi s el dest son Enl i l - J ehovah assumed t he pr esi dency. He
pr ocl ai med t hat he was mast er of al l t he Ear t h, al t hough hi s br ot her Enki - Samael
coul d r et ai n sover ei gnt y of t he seas. Enki was not at al l happy about hi s
br ot her ' s cl ai mbecause, al t hough Enl i l was t he el der of t he t wo, hi s mot her ,
Ki , was t hei r f at her Anu' s j uni or si st er , wher eas Enki ' s mot her , Ant u, was t he
seni or si st er . Tr ue ki ngshi p, cl ai med Enki , pr ogr essed as a mat r i l i near
i nst i t ut i on t hr ough t he f emal e l i ne, and by t hi s r i ght of descent Enki
mai nt ai ned t hat he was t he f i r st - bor n of t he r oyal successi on:

I amEnki . . . t he gr eat br ot her of t he gods. I amhe who has been bor n as t he
f i r st son of t he di vi ne Anu.

As a r esul t , t he peopl e of Babyl on announced t hei r al l egi ance t o Enki and hi s
son Mar duk - but t hi s was al l t oo much f or Enl i l - J ehovah. Havi ng l ost hi s
popul ar i t y, he opened t he gat es of Sumer t o l et i n i nvader s f r omal l si des. The
scr i bes r ecor ded t hat he, t he vengef ul Enl i l - J ehovah, br ought about t he " gr eat
and t er r i bl e st or m" whi ch caused t he anni hi l at i on of al l t he Sumer i an cul t ur e so
t hat t hei r l anguage was no l onger pr edomi nant and t her e was a " gr eat conf usi on
of t ongues" .

Al l t he wor k whi ch had been accompl i shed i n bui l di ng up a uni que ci vi l i sat i on
over t housands of year s was dest r oyed i n one f el l swoop by Enl i l - J ehovah, si mpl y
because he woul d not shar e aut hor i t y wi t h hi s br ot her Enki . The r ecor ds conf i r m
t hat , at t hat moment i n Sumer i an hi st or y, t he Gr and Assembl y of t he Anunnaki
vacat ed t hei r seat s and depar t ed " l i ke mi gr at i ng bi r ds" .

For al l t hat had occur r ed up t o t hat poi nt , an ur gent and si gni f i cant change i n
ki ngl y pr ocedur e was necessar y because t he Anunnaki St ar Fi r e was no l onger
avai l abl e. A subst i t ut e had t o be f ound. As pr evi ousl y ment i oned, t he pr i est l y
Scar l et Women had been pur pose- br ed f or t hi s; but i t was cl ear t hat , however
car ef ul l y mat ed, t hei r essence woul d weaken t hr ough t he gener at i ons.

I n t he event , t he cr eat i on of a mor e per manent and ver sat i l e subst i t ut e was not
a pr obl em, f or t hi s was t he pr ovi nce of a gr oup of pr evi ousl y t r ai ned
met al l ur gi st s whomEnki had cal l ed t he Mast er Cr af t smen. The f i r st of t hese
gr eat met al l ur gi st s t o be t r ai ned was Tubal - cai n t he Vul can - a si xt h- gener at i on
descendant of Cai n, who i s r emember ed even t oday i n moder n Fr eemasonr y.

I n consi der at i on of t he Bi bl e' s New Test ament symbol ogy, i t i s of par t i cul ar
i nt er est t o not e t hat J esus' f at her J oseph was hi msel f r ecor ded i n t he ear l y
Gospel s as bei ng a Mast er Cr af t sman. I n moder n Engl i sh- l anguage Bi bl es, J oseph
i s descr i bed as a ' car pent er ' , but t hi s i s a bl at ant mi st r ansl at i on. The wor d
' car pent er ' was wr ongl y der i ved f r omt he Gr eek ho- t ekt on whi ch act ual l y def i ned
a Mast er of t he Cr af t - not a woodwor ker , but a l ear ned al chemi cal met al l ur gi st
i n t he manner of hi s ancest r al f or ebear s.

I n t he Ol d Test ament Book of Exodus, at t he t i me of Moses we ar e i nt r oduced t o a
cer t ai n Bezal eel ( t he son of Ur i Ben Hur ) who i s sai d t o have been f i l l ed wi t h
t he spi r i t of t he El ohi mi n wi sdom, under st andi ng and knowl edge. We l ear n,
f ur t her mor e, t hat Bezal eel was a ski l l ed gol dsmi t h and a Mast er Cr af t sman, and
t hat he was pl aced i n over al l char ge of bui l di ng t he Ar k of t he Covenant . I n
det ai l i ng how Bezal eel shoul d manuf act ur e var i ous cr owns, r i ngs, bowl s and a
candl est i ck, al l of pur e gol d, t he Bi bl e t ext adds t o t he l i st somet hi ng cal l ed
t he Shewbr ead of t he Covenant , and wi t hout f ur t her expl anat i on t he deed i s seen
t o be done.

Al t hough t he wor d ' covenant ' has come t o be i dent i f i ed wi t h cont r act ual
agr eement s, i t or i gi nal l y meant ' t o eat br ead wi t h' , and i t i s per t i nent t o not e
t hat t he Lor d' s Pr ayer ( whi ch was di r ect l y t r ansposed f r oman Egypt i an
equi val ent ) speci f i es " Gi ve us t hi s day our dai l y br ead" . Thi s i s of t en t aken t o
r el at e t o sust enance i n gener al t er ms, but i n t he or i gi nal t r adi t i on t he
r ef er ence was mor e speci f i cal l y di r ect ed t o t he eni gmat i c shewbr ead - t he Gol den
Br ead of Bezal eel .

The Book of Levi t i cus al so r ef er s t o t he shewbr ead: And t hou shal t t ake f i ne
f l our and bake t wel ve cakes t her eof . . . And t hou shal t put pur e f r anki ncense upon
each r ow.

The use of t he wor d ' f l our ' i n Engl i sh t r ansl at i ons i s act ual l y i ncor r ect . The
wor d ' powder ' woul d be mor e accur at e. The r ecor ds of t he myst er y school s ci t e
r at her mor e pr eci sel y t hat shewbr ead was made wi t h t he whi t e powder of gol d, and
t hi s i s par t i cul ar l y si gni f i cant because i n Exodus i t i s st at ed t hat Moses t ook
t he gol den cal f whi ch t he I sr ael i t es had made " and bur nt i t i n t he f i r e, and
gr ound i t t o a whi t e powder " . I n t hi s i nst ance, t he cor r ect wor d ' powder ' i s
used, but f i r i ng gol d does not , of cour se, pr oduce powder - i t si mpl y pr oduces
mol t en gol d.

So what was t hi s magi cal whi t e powder ? I s t her e a way of usi ng heat t o t r ansf or m
met al l i c gol d i nt o a whi t e powder whi ch i s i ngest i bl e and benef i ci al ? I ndeed
t her e i s, and i t i s her e t hat t he f or emost al chemi cal pr i nci pl e of t he Mast er
Cr af t smen was appl i ed: " To make gol d, you must t ake gol d. "

Gol d i s t he most nobl e of met al s, and gol d was al ways r epr esent at i ve of Tr ut h.
Thr ough t he r egul ar use of Anunnaki St ar Fi r e ( t he Gol d of t he Gods) , t he
r eci pi ent s wer e moved i nt o r eal ms of hei ght ened awar eness and consci ousness
because of i t s i nher ent mel at oni n and ser ot oni n. Thi s was t he r eal mof advanced
enl i ght enment - t he Pl ane of Shar on - and t he St ar Fi r e gol d was deemed t o be
t he ul t i mat e r out e t o t he Li ght . Hence, t he heavy, mundane per son ( l ead) coul d
be el evat ed t o a hei ght ened st at e of awar eness ( per cei ved as gol d) . Thi s was t he
r oot of al l al chemi cal l or e t her eaf t er .

The shewbr ead ( or , as t he Egypt i ans cal l ed i t , schef f a f ood) was a t r adi t i onal
ent i t l ement of t he I sr ael i t e and Egypt i an Messi ahs, f or t he ear l y Phar aohs wer e
t hemsel ves f ul l y consecr at ed Pr i est - Ki ngs of t he Gr ai l Bl oodl i ne, havi ng
descended t hr ough Ni mr od i n t he Cai ni t e successi on.

I n anci ent Egypt , t he schef f a f ood was al ways depi ct ed as a coni cal cake.
Accor di ng t o t he r ecor ds, t hi s met al l i c br ead was used t o f eed t he Li ght - body,
as agai nst t he physi cal body, and t he Li ght - body was deemed t o be t he
consci ousness. As f ar back as 2200 BC, t he Phar aohs wer e usi ng t hi s suppl ement
t o enhance t hei r pi t ui t ar y and pi neal act i vi t y, t her eby t o hei ght en t hei r
per cept i on, awar eness and i nt ui t i on, but onl y t he met al l ur gi cal adept s of t he
myst er y school s ( t he Mast er Cr af t smen of t he Dr agon Cour t ) knew t he secr et of
i t s manuf act ur e.

I n t he Egypt i an Book of t he Dead ( t he ol dest compl et e book i n t he wor l d) , t he
Phar aoh i n sear ch of t he ul t i mat e f ood of enl i ght enment asks, at ever y st age of
hi s j our ney, t he si ngl e over r i di ng quest i on, " What i s i t ?" - a quest i on whi ch i n
t he Hebr ew l anguage ( as expl ai ned i n The Ant i qui t i es of t he J ews) was asked wi t h
t he si ngl e wor d, " Manna?" .

When t he Ar k of t he Covenant was compl et ed, Moses' br ot her Aar on was sai d t o
have pl aced an omer of manna i nt o t he Ar k. Thi s sacr ed manna was commonl y
associ at ed wi t h a myst i cal f or mof br ead - t he shewbr ead - or , as i t was cal l ed
i n Tubal - Cai n' s Mesopot ami a, t he shem- an- na.

At t hi s poi nt , we come t o a par t i cul ar l y i mpor t ant def i ni t i on of t he shem- an- na,
f or accor di ng t o t he Mast er Cr af t smen t hi s coni cal l y shaped ( or shem- shaped)
f ood was made of what t he Sumer i ans cal l ed Hi ghwar d Fi r e- st one.

I n t he New Test ament Book of t he Revel at i on i t i s sai d: To hi mt hat over comet h,
I wi l l gi ve t o eat of t he hi dden manna, and wi l l gi ve hi ma whi t e st one.

Bef or e we l ook at t he pr eci se nat ur e of t he whi t e st one of t he shem- an- na - t he
br ead made f r omt he powder of al chemi cal gol d - l et us f i r st l y consi der t he
f amous st at ue of Pr i est - Ki ng Mel chi zedek at Char t r es Cat hedr al i n Fr ance.

The st at ue por t r ays Mel chi zedek wi t h a cup cont ai ni ng a st one i n r epr esent at i on
of t he br ead and wi ne whi ch he appar ent l y of f er ed t o Abr aham, accor di ng t o
Genesi s. The wi ne, as we know, was embl emat i c of t he sacr ed St ar Fi r e ( j ust as
Communi on wi ne r epr esent s t he Messi ani c Bl ood t oday) , but t he t r ue i mpor t ance of
t he i mager y i s t hat t he br ead- st one i s hel d wi t hi n t he cup, t her eby si gni f yi ng
t hat St ar Fi r e was r epl aced by i t s subst i t ut e nour i shment at t he ver y t i me of
Mel chi zedek and Abr aham. Thi s subst i t ut e was made f r omshem- an- na - t he whi t e
powder of gol d, t he hi ghwar d f i r e- st one.

The obj ect of t he subst i t ut e was ver y st r ai ght f or war d. I nst ead of f eedi ng t he
r eci pi ent wi t h a di r ect hor monal suppl ement , t he powder had i t s ef f ect on t he
endocr i nal syst em( par t i cul ar l y t he pi neal gl and) , t her eby causi ng t he r eci pi ent
t o manuf act ur e hi s own super - hi gh l evel s of hor mones such as mel at oni n.

I n t he f amous Mi ddl e Ages Gr ai l r omance of Par zi val , by Wol f r amvon Eschenbach,
i t i s sai d of t he Templ e Kni ght s of Gr ai l Cast l e: They l i ve by vi r t ue of a st one
most pur e. I f you do not know i t s name, now l ear n: i t i s cal l ed l api s exi l i s. By
t he power of t he st one t he phoeni x i s bur ned t o ashes, but t he ashes speedi l y
r est or e i t t o l i f e. The phoeni x t hus moul t s and t her eupon gi ves out a br i ght
l i ght , so t hat i t i s as beaut i f ul as bef or e.

Many have wonder ed about t he name l api s exi l i s because i t appear s t o be a pl ay
on wor ds, combi ni ng t wo el ement s. Fi r st l y, i t i s l api s ex cael i s, meani ng ' st one
f r omt he heavens' , and, secondl y, i t i s l api s el i xi r , t he Phi l osopher s' St one by
whi ch base el ement s ar e t r ansf or med t o hi gher st at es of bei ng. Ei t her way, or
bot h, i t r el at es di r ect l y t o t he hi ghwar d f i r e- st one - t he shem- an- na of t he
exot i c St ar Fi r e subst i t ut e.

The key t o t he Par zi val al l egor y l i es i n t he descr i pt i on t hat t he phoeni x i s
" bur ned t o ashes" , but f r omt hose ver y ashes comes t he Gr eat Enl i ght enment . So,
what exact l y i s a phoeni x? I t i s a myt hi cal bi r d, we mi ght answer . But we woul d
be qui t e wr ong! The wor d ' phoeni x' i s f ar ol der t han t he Bennu bi r d myt hol ogy,
and i t i s i n f act anci ent Gr aeco- Phoeni ci an. ' Phoeni x' means ' cr i mson' or ' r ed-
gol d' .

Even t oday, wi t hi n t he conf i nes of t he Or do Templ i Or i ent i s, t he anci ent Mass of
t he Phoeni x i s per f or med as a symbol i c St ar Fi r e r i t ual . I t i s per t i nent t o not e
t hat Br amSt oker , t he aut hor of Dr acul a, was an of f i cer of t hi s Or der - as a
consequence of whi ch, much of hi s novel i s a coded r epr esent at i on of t he secr et
knowl edge. The t wo embl ems of t hi s ni nt h- degr ee cer emony ar e: t he upr i ght
t r i angl e of Gol d and Li ght ( r epr esent i ng spi r i t ) , and t he downt ur ned t r i angl e of
Bl ood and Wat er ( r epr esent i ng mat t er ) . I nt er l ocked, one upon t he ot her , t hey
f or mt he f ami l i ar Seal of Sol omon whi ch cont ai ns t he f or mul a t hat i s known as
t he Gemof Al chemy.

An ol d Al exandr i an al chemi cal t ext makes par t i cul ar ment i on of t he wei ght of t he
Phi l osopher s' St one - whi ch i t cal l s t he St one of Par adi se. I t st at es t hat : When
pl aced i n t he scal es, t he st one can out wei gh i t s quant i t y of gol d; but when i t
i s t r ansposed t o dust , even a f eat her wi l l t i p t he scal es agai nst i t .

I n t er ms of a mat hemat i cal f or mul a, t hi s r el at i onshi p i s wr i t t en as: 0 = ( +1) +
( - 1) . Thi s appear s t o be a ver y st r ai ght f or war d sumat f i r st gl ance, because
( +1) + ( - 1) does i ndeed equal zer o. But when appl i ed t o physi cal mat t er i t i s
act ual l y an i mpossi bi l i t y because i t r el i es upon usi ng a ' posi t i ve' and an
equi val ent ' negat i ve' t o pr oduce ' not hi ng' . The moment one has a posi t i ve pi ece
of somet hi ng, i t i s not possi bl e t o add an equi val ent negat i ve of t hat somet hi ng
t o pr oduce not hi ng. At best , one coul d move t he ' posi t i ve' somet hi ng out of
i mmedi at e si ght - but i t woul d st i l l exi st , and i t woul d t her ef or e not be
not hi ng.

The onl y way t o t ur n somet hi ng i nt o not hi ng, as f ar as t he mat er i al f i el d i s
concer ned, i s t o t r ansl at e t hat somet hi ng i nt o anot her di mensi on so t hat i t
physi cal l y di sappear s f r omt he mundane envi r onment . I f t hat pr ocess i s achi eved,
t hen t he pr oof of achi evement woul d l i e i n t he f act t hat i t s wei ght al so
di sappear s.

What , t hen, i s i t t hat can out wei gh i t sel f but can al so under wei gh i t sel f and
become not hi ng? What , t hen, i s i t t hat can be gol d, but can be f i r ed and
t r ansposed t o dust ? I t i s t he phoeni x - t he r ed- gol d t hat wi l l f i r e t o ashes but
wi l l t hen be r est or ed t o enl i ght enment . I t i s t he gol den cal f t hat Moses bur ned
t o a powder . I t i s t he hi ghwar d f i r e- st one of t he shem- an- na. And we know f r om
t he Sumer i an r ecor ds t hat t hi s was not made of st one at al l , but of shi ni ng
met al .

I n t he al chemi cal t r adi t i on, t he Phi l osopher s' St one i s sai d t o be t hat whi ch
t r ansl at es base el ement s i nt o gol d. Thi s i s deemed t o be t he case i n bot h t he
met al l ur gi cal sense and i n t he spi r i t ual sense of hi gher enl i ght enment . I n t he
physi cal sense, however , we must r et ur n t o t he ol dest of al l al chemi cal r ul es of
t he ear l i est myst er y school : " To make gol d, you must t ake gol d. "

Hence, i t i s det er mi ned t hat t her e ar e t wo di st i nct l y separ at e f or ms of physi cal
gol d: t he st r ai ght f or war d met al as we know i t , and a much ' hi gher ' st at e of gol d
- t hat i s, gol d i n a di f f er ent di mensi on of per cei ved mat t er , and t hi s i s t he
whi t e powder of gol d, t he hi dden manna whose secr et manuf act ur e was known onl y
by t he Mast er Cr af t smen.

So, what pr eci sel y i s t he ' hi ghwar d' or ' hi gh- spi n' st at e whi ch conver t s gol d
( and pl at i num- gr oup met al s) i nt o a sweet - t ast i ng, i mpal pabl e whi t e powder ?

A nor mal at omhas ar ound i t a scr eeni ng pot ent i al - a posi t i ve scr eeni ng
pr oduced by t he nucl eus. The maj or i t y of el ect r ons goi ng r ound t he nucl eus ar e
wi t hi n t hi s scr eeni ng pot ent i al , except f or t he ver y out er el ect r ons. However ,
t he nucl eus goes t o t he hi ghwar d or hi gh- spi n st at e when t he posi t i ve scr eeni ng
pot ent i al expands t o br i ng al l of t he el ect r ons under t he cont r ol of t he
nucl eus.

El ect r ons nor mal l y t r avel ar ound t he nucl eus i n pai r s: a ' spi n- f or war d' el ect r on
and a ' spi n- r ever se' el ect r on. But when t hese come under t he i nf l uence of a
hi gh- spi n nucl eus, al l of t he spi n- f or war d el ect r ons become cor r el at ed wi t h t he
spi n- r ever se el ect r ons. When per f ect l y cor r el at ed, t he el ect r ons t ur n t o pur e
whi t e l i ght , and i t i s qui t e i mpossi bl e f or t he i ndi vi dual at oms i n t he hi gh-
spi n subst ance t o l i nk t oget her . Hence t hey cannot r ef or mas met al , and t he
whol e r emai ns si mpl y an i mpal pabl e whi t e powder .

The t r ul y unusual t hi ng about t hi s whi t e powder i s t hat , t hr ough var i ous appl i ed
pr ocesses, i t s wei ght wi l l r i se and f al l t o hundr eds of per cent above i t s
opt i mumwei ght , down t o l ess t han absol ut el y not hi ng. Mor eover , i t s opt i mum
wei ght i s act ual l y f i f t y- si x per cent of t he met al wei ght f r omwhi ch i t was
t r ansmut ed. So, wher e does t he ot her f or t y- f our per cent go? I t becomes not hi ng
but pur e l i ght , and t r ansl at es t o anot her di mensi on beyond t he physi cal wor l d.
Thi s conf or ms pr eci sel y wi t h t he anci ent Al exandr i an t ext - t hat t he Par adi se
St one, when pl aced i n t he scal es, can out wei gh i t s quant i t y of gol d; but when
t r ansposed t o dust , even a f eat her wi l l t i p t he scal es agai nst i t .

Some of you may r ecal l t he NEXUS publ i cat i on of a l ect ur e gi ven by Davi d Hudson
of ORMES LLC, Ar i zona, i n 1996 [ see NEXUS 3/ 05, 3/ 06] . I n t hi s t al k, Davi d
expl ai ned how he came upon t he whi t e powder pr oduct i on by pur e chance when
r unni ng l abor at or y t est s on soi l and or e sampl es.

Dur i ng t he cour se of hi s ext ensi ve r esear ch, he di scover ed t hat not onl y i s t he
powder of t he hi ghwar d f i r e- st one capabl e of r ai si ng human consci ousness, but i t
i s al so a monat omi c super conduct or wi t h no gr avi t at i onal at t r act i on.

As a poi nt of war ni ng her e, I shoul d add t hat t hi s par t i cul ar powder of gol d has
absol ut el y no connect i on wi t h t he subst ances cur r ent l y mar ket ed under t he l abel s
of Et her i umGol d, I si s Gol d and Manat au Gol d. What ever t hei r adver t i si ng
mat er i al mi ght suggest , none of t hese pr oduct s cont ai n chemi cal l y measur abl e
gol d i n t he hi ghwar d st at e.

One of t he gr eat r esear cher s i nt o gr avi t y f r omt he 1960s per i od has been t he
Russi an physi ci st Sakhar ov, and t he mat hemat i cs f or Sakhar ov' s t heor y ( based on
gr avi t y as a zer o- poi nt ) wer e publ i shed by Hal Put hof f of t he I nst i t ut e of
Advanced St udi es i n 1989 [ Physi cal Revi ew A, vol . 39, no. 5, 1 Mar ch 1989] . Wi t h
r egar d t o t he monat omi c whi t e powder , Put hof f has made t he poi nt t hat because
gr avi t y det er mi nes space- t i me, t hen t he powder i s capabl e of bendi ng space- t i me.
I t i s " exot i c mat t er " , he expl ai ned, wi t h a gr avi t at i onal at t r act i on of l ess
t han zer o!

To put t hi ngs i nt o per spect i ve, i t i s i mpor t ant t o r ecogni se t hat j ust about
ever yt hi ng we now know about t he l i f e and ci vi l i sat i ons of t he di st ant BC year s
has been l ear ned si nce t he l at e 1800s. Pr i or t o t hat , t he Ol d Test ament was one
of ver y f ew document s of r ecor d. But t he Ol d Test ament was never i nt ended t o be
an accur at e r epor t i ng of hi st or y; i t was act ual l y a book of scr i pt ur e desi gned
t o under pi n a gr owi ng r el i gi ous movement .

To some ext ent , j ust l i ke t he scr i pt ur es of ot her r el i gi ons, t he Hebr ew wr i t i ngs
wer e based on myt hol ogi cal t r adi t i on, but , si nce t he i nher ent st or i es wer e never
f ound unt i l r ecent l y i n any ot her document ed f or m, t he Ol d Test ament has been
t r eat ed f or count l ess cent ur i es as i f i t wer e an absol ut e, f act ual t r ut h.

And so t he myt hol ogy became desi gnat ed as hi st or y by our gover ni ng and
educat i onal est abl i shment s, and i t has been t aught as such i n our school s and
chur ches f or t he l ongest t i me.

Now we have a vast amount of or i gi nal l i t er at ur e enabl i ng us t o be f ar bet t er
i nf or med, f or a gr eat number of anci ent document s have been unear t hed, many pr e-
dat i ng t he or i gi nal wr i t i ng of Genesi s by up t o 2, 000 year s.

One woul d expect such di scover i es t o be wel comed wi t h ent husi asm. But t hi s has
not been t he case. I nst ead, t hey have posed sever e pr obl ems and ar e r egar ded not
as benef i ci al r evel at i ons but as t hr eat s. What do t hey t hr eat en? They t hr eat en
t o under mi ne t he one- t i me myt hol ogy t hat has been er r oneousl y dubbed as hi st or y.
How does t he est abl i shment cope wi t h t hi s t hr eat ? I t cl i ngs on t i ght l y t o t he
cont r i ved hi st or y, and decl ar es t hat t he f i r st - hand document s of hi st or y ar e
myt hol ogi cal !

Bet ween t he 1850s and t he 1930s, r ecor ds whi ch had been hi dden f or count l ess
l i f et i mes beneat h t he wi ndswept deser t sands suddenl y appear ed, bear i ng t he
names of such wel l - known char act er s as Abr aham, Esau, I sr ael , Heber , Nahor ,
Ter ah and many ot her s f r omt he Bi bl e. These wer e wr i t t en dur i ng t he l i f et i mes of
t hese men by peopl e who wer e associ at ed wi t h t hem, wher eas t he books of t he Ol d
Test ament wer e compi l ed over 1, 000 year s l at er . But , one by one, t hese document s
have been cl assi f i ed as myt hol ogy. Why? Because t hey t el l a ver y di f f er ent st or y
t o t hat whi ch we ar e t aught f r omt he Bi bl e.

By t he 1880s, t he gover ni ng est abl i shment s of Chr i st endomwer e dr eadi ng t he ver y
wor d ' ar chaeol ogi st ' . And so, ar chaeol ogi cal di gs wer e br ought under st r i ct
cont r ol , and t hei r f undi ng and under t aki ngs had t o be appr oved by newl y
desi gnat ed aut hor i t i es.

One of t hese, t he Egypt Expl or at i on Fund, was est abl i shed i n Br i t ai n i n 1891,
and on t he ver y f i r st page of i t s Memor andumand Ar t i cl es of Associ at i on i t i s
st at ed t hat t he Fund' s obj ect i ve i s t o pr omot e excavat i on wor k " f or t he pur pose
of el uci dat i ng or i l l ust r at i ng t he Ol d Test ament nar r at i ve" .

I n shor t , t hi s meant t hat i f somet hi ng was f ound whi ch coul d be used t o suppor t
t he scr i pt ur al t eachi ng, t hen we ( t he publ i c) woul d be i nf or med. Anyt hi ng whi ch
di d not suppor t t he Chur ch i nt er pr et at i on of t he Bi bl e was not dest i ned t o see
t he l i ght i n t he publ i c domai n.

Now we ar e goi ng t o t ake a l ook at one of t he monument al f i nds f r omt hat er a - a
di scover y about whi ch ver y l i t t l e i s known t o peopl e at l ar ge. I n f act , i t i s
pr obabl y t he most i mpor t ant bi bl i cal di scover y ever made and i t has st unni ng
i mpl i cat i ons f ar beyond t he di scover y i t sel f , f or t hi s i s t he ul t i mat e st or y of
t he Phoeni x and t he Fi r e- st one.

Wi t hi n t he Book of Exodus, a si gni f i cant bi bl i cal mount ai n i s named. I t si t s i n
t he ext ensi ve r ange of t he Si nai Peni nsul a - t he upt ur ned t r i angul ar l and- mass
whi ch l i es above t he Red Sea bet ween t he Gul f of Suez and t he Gul f of Aqabah. I n
t he Ol d Test ament , t he mount ai n i s f i r st l y cal l ed ' Mount Hor eb' , t hen i t i s
cal l ed ' Mount Si nai ' , and i s subsequent l y cal l ed ' Hor eb' agai n as t he st or y
pr ogr esses.

The st or y, of cour se, i s t hat of Moses and t he I sr ael i t e exodus f r omEgypt . Thi s
was t he mount ai n upon whi ch, accor di ng t o Exodus, Moses saw t he bur ni ng bush;
t he mount ai n wher e he t al ked wi t h J ehovah; and t he pl ace wher e he r ecei ved t he
Ten Commandment s and t he Tabl es of Test i mony.

Somet hi ng t hat we shoul d r ecogni se at t hi s st age i s t hat at t he t i me of Moses
( r oughl y 1350 BC) t her e was no mount ai n cal l ed ' Mount Si nai ' . Ther e was no
mount ai n by t hat name even i n t he days of J esus, nor even f or anot her 300 year s.

I t shoul d al so be sai d t hat t he Ol d Test ament whi ch i s f ami l i ar t o us t oday i s a
t r ansl at i on f r oma Hebr ew t ext compi l ed onl y 1, 000 year s ago, and i t i s
t her ef or e a f ew cent ur i es younger even t han t he canoni cal New Test ament .

The mount ai n now gener al l y known as Mount Si nai si t s i n t he sout h of t he
peni nsul a, qui t e near t o t he bot t ompoi nt of t he upt ur ned t r i angl e. I t was gi ven
i t s name i n t he 4t h cent ur y AD by a mi ssi on of Gr eek Chr i st i an monks, 1, 700
year s af t er t he t i me of Moses. I t i s now somet i mes cal l ed ' Gebel Musa' ( or
' Mount of Moses' ) , and a smal l Chr i st i an r et r eat , St Cat her i ne' s Monast er y,
st i l l exi st s t her e. But , was t hi s t he Si nai mount ai n whi ch t he Bi bl e cal l s
' Mount Hor eb' ? Wel l , i t t r anspi r es t hat i t was not .

The Book of Exodus goes i nt o some det ai l t o expl ai n t he r out e t aken by Moses and
t he I sr ael i t es f r omt he Ni l e Del t a l and of Goshen, down acr oss Si nai , acr oss t he
wi l der ness r egi ons of Shur and Par an, t o t he l and of Mi di an ( whi ch i s t o t he
nor t h of pr esent - day J or dan) . Fr omt hi s r out e i t becomes ver y easy t o i dent i f y
t he l ocat i on of Mount Hor eb. I t si t s a good deal nor t h of Gebel Musa.

The wor d hor eb si mpl y means ' deser t ' , and t he gr eat deser t mount ai n whi ch soar s
t o over 2, 600 f eet wi t hi n a hi gh st one pl at eau above t he Pl ai n of Par an i s t oday
cal l ed ' Ser b t ' - or , t o be mor e pr eci se, Ser b t el - Khdi m( t he Pr omi nence of
t he Khdi m) .

I n t he l at e 1890s, t he Br i t i sh Egypt ol ogi st Si r Wi l l i amFl i nder s Pet r i e, a
Pr of essor at t he Uni ver si t y Col l ege, London, appl i ed t o t he Egypt Expl or at i on
Fund t o t ake an expedi t i on i nt o Si nai . By J anuar y l 904, he and hi s t eamwer e i n
Si nai , and i n Mar ch of t hat year t hey t ook t hei r expedi t i on t o t he hei ght s of
Mount Ser b t .

I n t he f ol l owi ng year , Pet r i e publ i shed t he det ai l ed r esul t s of hi s f i ndi ngs,
but added t o hi s r epor t t he f act t hat t hi s i nf or mat i on woul d not be made
avai l abl e of f i ci al l y t o t he Egypt Expl or at i on Fund subscr i ber s; t hey woul d
r ecei ve onl y maps and a gener al out l i ne. Fur t her mor e, Pet r i e expl ai ned t hat even
t hough he had t aken pr evi ousl y f unded t eams i nt o Egypt , f r omt he t i me of t hat
Si nai expedi t i on hi s sponsor shi p by t he Fund had been t er mi nat ed. Why? Had he
per haps br oken t he bi ndi ng r ul e of t he Ar t i cl es by di vul gi ng somet hi ng whi ch was
cont r ar y t o Bi bl e t eachi ng? He cer t ai nl y had.

I n f act , Pet r i e had di scover ed t he gr eat secr et of t he sacr ed mount ai n of Moses
- a secr et whi ch not onl y made sense of t he Exodus por t r ayal s, but whi ch ( i n so
doi ng) bl ew t he l i d t ot al l y f r omt hei r common scr i pt ur al i nt er pr et at i on.

What t he Bi bl e does not make cl ear i s t hat Si nai was not a f or ei gn l and t o t he
Egypt i ans. I t was act ual l y r egar ded as a par t of Egypt and came under Phar aoni c
cont r ol . So Moses and t he I sr ael i t es had not l ef t Egypt once t hey wer e east of
t he Ni l e Del t a; t hey wer e st i l l i n Egypt , havi ng t he whol e Si nai Peni nsul a t o
cr oss bef or e t hey ent er ed t he Pal est i ni an l and of Canaan.

Dur i ng t he t i me of Moses, Si nai came under t he cont r ol of t wo Egypt i an
of f i ci al s: t he Royal Chancel l or and t he Royal Messenger . Thi s was t he er a of
Egypt ' s 18t h Dynast y - t he dynast y of t he Tut hmosi s and Amenhot ep Phar aohs,
al ong wi t h Akhenat en and Tut ankhamun. The Royal Messenger of t hose t i mes was
Neby, an of f i ci al who was al so t he mayor and t r oop commander of Zar u i n t he Ni l e
Del t a r egi on of Goshen, wher e t he I sr ael i t es had l i ved bef or e t he exodus.

The posi t i on of Royal Chancel l or was her edi t ar y i n t he Hyksos f ami l y of Pa-
Nehas, and Panahesy of t hi s f ami l y was t he of f i ci al Gover nor of Si nai . We know
hi mbet t er f r omt he Bi bl e as Phi nehas. He became one of t he f i r st pr i est s of t he
new Mosai c st r uct ur e, but pr evi ousl y he had been t he Chi ef Pr i est at Phar aoh
Akhenat en' s t empl e at Amar na.

Bef or e we get back t o Si r Wi l l i amFl i nder s Pet r i e, and t o under st and t he r oot
si gni f i cance of hi s di scover y, i t i s wor t h maki ng a necessar y di st i nct i on
bet ween t he I sr ael i t es and t he Hebr ews of t he Mosai c er a. At t hat t i me t hey wer e
not one and t he same, as Bi bl e t eachi ng seems t o i ndi cat e. The Hebr ews wer e t he
f ami l y and descendant s of Abr aham, and t hei r pl ace of r esi dence was, i n t he
mai n, Canaan ( or Pal est i ne) . The I sr ael i t es, on t he ot her hand, wer e t he f ami l y
and descendant s of one of Abr aham' s gr andsons, J acob, whose name was changed t o
' I sr ael ' . I t was J acob' s f ami l y al one who had moved i nt o Egypt , and i t was t hei r
descendant s who event ual l y r et ur ned wi t h Moses - t o be r euni t ed, af t er count l ess
gener at i ons, wi t h t hei r f el l ow Hebr ews.

The di f f er ence bet ween t he st r ai ns was, of cour se, t hat t he I sr ael i t es had l ong
been subj ect ed t o t he l aws and r el i gi ons of Egypt and t hey knew ver y l i t t l e
about t he cust oms of t hei r cousi ns i n Canaan. Thr ough mor e t han 400 year s t hey
had been i n an envi r onment wi t h a whol e pant heon of gods; and al t hough t hey had
devel oped a ' One God' concept wi t hi n t hei r own f r at er ni t y, t hat god was not t he
J ehovah of t he Canaani t e Hebr ews.

The I sr ael i t es' god was a f acel ess ent i t y whomt hey cal l ed, qui t e si mpl y, ' t he
Lor d' . I n t he I sr ael i t e l anguage he was cal l ed ' Adon' . Thi s i s one of t he
r easons why t he names ' Lor d' and ' J ehovah' wer e al ways separ at el y i dent i f i ed i n
ear l y t ext s, al t hough t hey wer e br ought under t he wr ap of t he si ngl e God i n
l at er t i mes t o sui t t he emer gent J ewi sh and Chr i st i an f ai t hs. To t he Egypt i ans,
t he name of t hi s Lor d ( Adon) was qui t e si mi l ar ; t hey cal l ed hi m' At en' . Fr om
t hi s der i ved t he name of Phar aoh Akhenat en, meani ng ' Ser vant of At en' .

So, when Moses and t he I sr ael i t es made t hei r exodus i nt o Si nai , t hey ar r i ved not
as wor shi pper s of J ehovah but of At en; and i t was f or t hi s ver y r eason t hat t hey
wer e gi ven a whol e new set of l aws and or di nances t o br i ng t hemi nt o l i ne wi t h
t he Hebr ew cul t ur e of t hei r pr ospect i ve new homel and.

When Moses and t he I sr ael i t es l ef t t he Ni l e Del t a, t hei r obvi ous r out e t o Canaan
( wher e t hey wer e event ual l y headed) woul d have been di r ect l y acr oss t he
wi l der ness of nor t her n Si nai . So, why di d t hey push sout hwar d i nt o t he di f f i cul t
hi gh count r y t o spend some t i me at t he Hor eb mount ai n of Ser b t ? Thi s was a
quest i on t hat had l ong puzzl ed Pet r i e and hi s t eam.



So, what pr eci sel y di d t hey f i nd hi gh on t he Bi bl e' s hol y mount ai n? Wel l , t o
begi n wi t h, t hey f ound not hi ng ver y much. But on a wi de pl at eau near t he summi t
t her e wer e di st i nct si gns of anci ent habi t at i on, and some pi l l ar s and st andi ng-
st ones coul d be seen pr ot r udi ng above t he gr ound- r ubbl e. Thi s r ubbl e had been
deposi t ed, l i t t l e by l i t t l e, by wi nd and l andsl i des over some 3, 000 year s. But
when i t was f i nal l y moved away, t he t r ut h of t he Bi bl e st or y emer ged. Pet r i e
wr ot e:

Ther e i s no ot her such monument whi ch makes us r egr et t hat i t i s not i n bet t er
pr eser vat i on. The whol e of i t was bur i ed, and no one had any knowl edge of i t
unt i l we cl ear ed t he si t e.

What t hey f ound was an enor mous t empl e compl ex. Set wi t hi n an encl osur e wal l was
an out er t empl e, bui l t over an expanse of 230 f eet ( appr ox. 70 met r es) . Thi s
ext ended out war ds f r oman i nner t empl e cut wi t hi n a gr eat cave i n t he
mount ai nsi de. Fr omt he var i ous car t ouches, car vi ngs and i nscr i pt i ons i t emer ged
t hat t he t empl e had been i n use f r omas f ar back as t he t i me of Phar aoh Snef er u,
who r ei gned about 2600 BC and whose i mmedi at e successor s ar e r eckoned t o have
bui l t t he pyr ami ds of Gi zeh.

The above- gr ound par t of t he t empl e was const r uct ed f r omsandst one quar r i ed f r om
t he mount ai n and i t compr i sed a ser i es of adj oi ned hal l s, shr i nes, cour t s,
cubi cl es and chamber s. Of t hese, t he key f eat ur es unear t hed wer e t he mai n
Sanct uar y, t he Shr i ne of Ki ngs, t he Por t i co Cour t , and t he Hal l of t he goddess
Hat hor ( t o whomt he whol e compl ex was dedi cat ed) .

Al l ar ound wer e pi l l ar s and st el ae denot i ng t he Egypt i an Ki ngs t hr ough t he ages,
and cer t ai n Phar aohs such as Tut hmosi s I I I ( f ounder of t he Rosi cr uci an movement
i n Egypt ) wer e depi ct ed many t i mes on st andi ng- st ones and wal l r el i ef s.

The adj oi ni ng Cave of Hat hor was car ved i nt o t he nat ur al r ock, wi t h f l at i nner
wal l s t hat had been car ef ul l y smoot hed. I n t he cent r e ( f r omabout 1820 BC) st ood
a l ar ge upr i ght pi l l ar of Phar aoh Amenemhet I I I , t he son- i n- l aw of Esau. Al so
por t r ayed wer e hi s seni or chamber l ai n and hi s seal - bear er .

Deep wi t hi n t he cave Pet r i e f ound a l i mest one st el a of Phar aoh Ramesses I - a
sl ab upon whi ch Ramesses ( who i s t r adi t i onal l y r eckoned by Egypt ol ogi st s t o have
been an opposer of t he At en cul t ) sur pr i si ngl y descr i bed hi msel f as " The r ul er
of al l t hat At en embr aces" . Al so f ound was an Amar na st at ue- head of Akhenat en' s
mot her , Queen Ti ye of Egypt , wi t h her car t ouche set i n t he cr own.

I n t he cour t s and hal l s of t he out er t empl e t her e wer e numer ous st one- car ved
r ect angul ar t anks and ci r cul ar basi ns, al ong wi t h a var i et y of cur i ousl y shaped
bencht abl es wi t h r ecessed f r ont s and spl i t - l evel sur f aces. Ther e wer e al so r ound
t abl es, t r ays and saucer s t oget her wi t h al abast er vases and cont ai ner s, many of
whi ch wer e shaped l i ke l ot us f l ower s. I n addi t i on, t he r ooms housed a good
col l ect i on of gl azed pl aques, car t ouches, scar abs and sacr ed or nament s desi gned
wi t h spi r al s, di agonal squar es and basket wor k. Ther e wer e magi cal wands of an
uni dent i f i ed har d mat er i al , and i n t he por t i co wer e t wo coni cal st ones of about
si x i nches and ni ne i nches, r espect i vel y, i n hei ght .

The expl or er s wer e baf f l ed enough by t hese f i nds, but t hey wer e f ur t her
conf ounded by t he di scover y of a met al l ur gi st ' s cr uci bl e. Ever si nce,
Egypt ol ogi st s have ar gued as t o why cr uci bl es woul d have been necessar y i n a
t empl e - whi l e at t he same t i me debat i ng a myst er i ous subst ance, cal l ed mf kzt ,
whi ch seemed t o be r el at ed t o t he cr uci bl e and t he coni cal st ones and whi ch had
dozens of ment i ons i n wal l and st el ae i nscr i pt i ons.

Some have suggest ed t hat mf kzt mi ght have been copper ; many have pr ef er r ed t he
i dea of t ur quoi se; and ot her s have supposed i t was per haps mal achi t e. But t hese
ar e al l unsubst ant i at ed guesses, and t her e wer e no t r aces of any of t hese
mat er i al s at t he si t e.

Si nai i s not ed f or i t s t ur quoi se mi nes, but i f t ur quoi se mi ni ng had been a
pr i mar y f unct i on of t he t empl e mast er s over so many cent ur i es t hen one woul d
expect t o f i nd t ur quoi se st ones i n abundance wi t hi n t he t ombs of Egypt . But such
i s not t he case. Har dl y any have been f ound.

Anot her cause of wonder ment has been t he i nnumer abl e i nscr i bed r ef er ences t o
' br ead' , al ong wi t h t he pr omi nent hi er ogl yph f or ' Li ght ' f ound i n t he Shr i ne of
t he Ki ngs.

The di scover y whi ch caused t he most bewi l der ment , however , was t he unear t hi ng of
somet hi ng whi ch was i dent i f i ed as t he eni gmat i c mf kzt t o whi ch t he ' br ead'
symbol i smseemed t o be r el at ed. Layi ng some i nches deep i n a st or er oomwas a
consi der abl e suppl y of t he f i nest , pur e whi t e, unadul t er at ed powder .

At t he t i me, some suggest ed t hat t he powder coul d be a r emnant of copper
smel t i ng, but , as was qui ckl y poi nt ed out , smel t i ng does not pr oduce whi t e
powder ; i t l eaves a dense bl ack sl ag. Mor eover , t her e was no suppl y of copper
or e wi t hi n mi l es of t he t empl e, and t he ol d smel t i ng wor ks wer e i n any event
appar ent i n t he di st ant val l eys. Ot her s guessed t hat t he powder was ash f r omt he
bur ni ng of pl ant s t o pr oduce al kal i , but t her e was no t r ace what ever of any
pl ant r esi due.

For want of any ot her expl anat i on, i t was det er mi ned t hat t he whi t e powder and
t he coni cal st ones wer e pr obabl y associ at ed wi t h some f or mof sacr i f i ci al r i t e,
but agai n i t was poi nt ed out t hat t hi s was an Egypt i an t empl e and ani mal
sacr i f i ce was not an Egypt i an pr act i ce. Mor eover , t her e wer e no r emnant s
what ever of bones or any ot her f or ei gn mat t er wi t hi n t he mf kzt , whi ch appear ed
f or al l t he wor l d l i ke a hoar d of sacr ed t al cum- powder .

Some of t he myst er i ous powder was t aken back t o Br i t ai n f or anal ysi s and
exami nat i on - but no r esul t s wer e ever publ i shed. The r est ( opened t o t he
el ement s af t er 3, 000 year s) was l ef t t o become a vi ct i mof t he deser t wi nds.



What has become appar ent , however , i s t hat t hi s powder was seemi ngl y i dent i cal
t o t he anci ent Mesopot ami an f i r e- st one or shem- an- na - t he subst ance t hat was
made i nt o br ead- cakes and used t o f eed t he Li ght - bodi es of t he Babyl oni an Ki ngs
and t he Phar aohs of Egypt .

Thi s, of cour se, expl ai ns t he t empl e i nscr i pt i ons denot i ng t he i mpor t ance of
br ead and l i ght , and t hi s whi t e powder ( t he shem- an- na) was i dent i f i ed wi t h t he
sacr ed manna t hat Aar on pl aced i n t he Ar k of t he Covenant . I n Egypt , t he cakes
made f r omt hi s powder wer e cal l ed ' schef f a f ood' , whi l e t he I sr ael i t es cal l ed
t hem' shewbr ead' .

The Book of Exodus t el l s us t hat t he Mast er Cr af t sman who made t he or i gi nal
shewbr ead f or Moses i n Si nai was Bezal eel , t he son of Ur i Ben Hur . But Bezal eel
was not a baker ; he was a not ed gol dsmi t h - t he ver y man who made t he gol den
accout r ement s f or t he Taber nacl e and t he Ar k of t he Covenant .

Thi s conf or ms pr eci sel y wi t h t he f unct i on of t he pr i est l y Mast er Cr af t smen i n
Mesopot ami a. They wer e t he gr eat Vul cans and met al l ur gi st s of Tubal - cai n, who
manuf act ur ed t he val uabl e shem- an- na f r ompur e gol d.

As f or t he cr uci bl e, t he coni cal st ones and t he gr eat ar r ay of t anks, t abl es and
equi pment whi ch made t he Si nai t empl e appear mor e l i ke a gi gant i c l abor at or y
t han a chur ch, i t emer ges t hat t hi s i s pr eci sel y what i t was.

What Pet r i e had act ual l y f ound was t he al chemi cal wor kshop of Akhenat en and of
t he 18 dynast i es of Phar aohs bef or e hi m- a t empl e- l abor at or y wher e t he f ur nace
woul d have r oar ed and smoked i n t he pr oduct i on of t he sacr ed f i r e- st one of t he
hi gh- spi n shem- an- na. Qui t e suddenl y, t he wor ds of Exodus begi n t o make sense as
we r ead t hemagai n wi t h a whol l y new i nsi ght :

And Mount Si nai was al t oget her on a smoke because t he Lor d descended upon i t i n
f i r e, and t he smoke t her eof

ascended as t he smoke of a f ur nace, and t he whol e mount quaked gr eat l y.

I n Exodus we r ead t hat Moses t ook t he gol den cal f whi ch t he I sr ael i t es had made,
and t hen bur nt i t i n t he f i r e and gr ound i t t o a whi t e powder . Thi s i s pr eci sel y
t he pr ocess of a shem- an- na f ur nace, and i t i s evi dent t hat t he Egypt i an pr i est s
of t he goddess Hat hor had been wor ki ng t hei r f i r e f or count l ess gener at i ons
bef or e t he pr i est s of At en became i nvol ved i n t he t i me of Moses.

I t was i n f act Phar aoh Tut hmosi s I I I who had r eor gani sed t he anci ent myst er y-
school s of Thot h and f ounded t he Royal School of t he Mast er Cr af t smen at Kar nak.
They wer e cal l ed t he ' Gr eat Whi t e Br ot her hood' because of t hei r pr eoccupat i on
wi t h a myst er i ous whi t e powder . A br anch of t hi s f r at er ni t y became especi al l y
concer ned wi t h medi ci nes and heal i ng, and t hey became known as t he Egypt i an
' Ther apeut at e' . I n much l at er t i mes, t he Ther apeut at e ext ended i t s act i vi t i es
i nt o Pal est i ne, especi al l y i nt o t he J udah set t l ement of Qumr an wher e t hey
f l our i shed as t he Essenes.

But what was so speci al about t he goddess Hat hor ? Why was she t he chosen dei t y
of t he Si nai pr i est s? Hat hor was a par amount nur si ng goddess, and as t he
daught er of Ra she was sai d t o have gi ven bi r t h t o t he Sun. She was t he
or i gi nal l y def i ned ' Queen of t he West ' and ' Mi st r ess of t he Net her wor l d' , t o
wher e she was sai d t o car r y t hose who knew t he r i ght spel l s. She was t he r ever ed
pr ot ect r ess of womanhood, t he ' Lady of t he Sycamor e' , and t he goddess of l ove,
t ombs and song. And i t was f r omt he mi l k of Hat hor t hat t he Phar aohs wer e sai d
t o gai n t hei r di vi ni t y, becomi ng gods i n t hei r own r i ght .

On one of t he r ock t abl et s near t o t he Mount Ser b t cave ent r ance i s a
r epr esent at i on of Tut hmosi s I V i n t he pr esence of Hat hor . Bef or e hi mar e t wo
of f er i ng- st ands t opped wi t h l ot us f l ower s, and behi nd hi mi s a man bear i ng a
coni cal cake of whi t e br ead. Anot her r el i ef det ai l s t he mason Ankhi b of f er i ng
t wo coni cal br ead- cakes of shem- an- na t o t he ki ng, and t her e ar e si mi l ar
por t r ayal s el sewher e i n t he t empl e compl ex. One of t he most si gni f i cant per haps
i s a depi ct i on of Hat hor and Amenhot ep I I I . The goddess hol ds a neckl ace i n one
hand, whi l e of f er i ng t he embl emof l i f e and domi ni on t o t he Phar aoh wi t h t he
ot her . Behi nd her i s t he t r easur er Sobekhot ep, who hol ds i n r eadi ness a coni cal
cake of whi t e br ead. Sobekhot ep i s descr i bed as t he " Over seer of t he Secr et s of
t he House of Gol d, who br ought t he nobl e and pr eci ous st one t o Hi s Maj est y" .

I ment i oned ear l i er t hat , upon comi ng out of Egypt i nt o Si nai en r out e t o
Canaan, t he I sr ael i t es woul d have expect ed t o be made f ami l i ar wi t h t he l aws and
or di nances of t hei r new homel and. However , al t hough t hi s appear s t o have been
par t i al l y t he case, t he si t uat i on was l ar gel y r ever sed on t he r el i gi ous f r ont ,
wi t h t he Egypt i an cust oms bei ng i nt r oduced t o t he nat i ve Hebr ews.

I t was upon t he mount ai n at Si nai t hat J ehovah f i r st announced hi s pr esence t o
Moses. Bei ng an At en suppor t er , Moses asked t hi s new l or d and mast er who he was,
and t he r epl y was " I amt hat I am" , whi ch i n phonet i c Hebr ew became ' J ehovah' .
However , f or t he l ongest t i me af t er war ds, t he I sr ael i t es wer e not al l owed t o
ut t er t he name ' J ehovah' - wi t h t he except i on of t he Hi gh Pr i est who was al l owed
t o whi sper t he name i n pr i vat e once a year . The pr obl emwas t hat pr ayer s wer e
supposed t o be sai d t o t hi s new godhead - but how woul d he know t he pr ayer s wer e
sai d t o hi mi f hi s name was not ment i oned?

The I sr ael i t es knew t hat J ehovah was not t he same as At en ( t hei r t r adi t i onal
Adon or Lor d) , and so t hey pr esumed he must be t he equi val ent of t he gr eat
St at e- god of Egypt , even i f not one and t he same. I t was deci ded, t her ef or e, t o
add t he name of t hat St at e- god t o al l pr ayer s t her eaf t er , and t he name of t hat
god was ' Amen' . To t hi s day, t he name of ' Amen' i s st i l l r eci t ed at t he end of
pr ayer s. Even t he wel l - known Chr i st i an Lor d' s Pr ayer ( as gi ven i n t he Gospel of
Mat t hew) was t r ansposed f r oman Egypt i an or i gi nal whi ch began, " Amen, Amen, who
ar t i n heaven. . . "

As f or t he f amous Ten Commandment s ( sai d t o have been conveyed t o Moses by God
upon t he mount ai n) , t hese t oo ar e of Egypt i an or i gi n and t hey der i ve di r ect l y
f r omSpel l Number 125 i n t he Egypt i an Book of t he Dead. They wer e not new codes
of conduct i nvent ed f or t he I sr ael i t es, but wer e si mpl y newl y st at ed ver si ons of
t he r i t ual conf essi ons of t he Phar aohs. For exampl e, t he conf essi on " I have not
ki l l ed" was t r ansl at ed t o t he decr ee " Thou shal t not ki l l " ; " I have not st ol en"
became " Thou shal t not st eal " ; " I have not t ol d l i es" became " Thou shal t not
bear f al se wi t ness" ; and so on.

Not onl y wer e t he Ten Commandment s dr awn f r omEgypt i an r i t ual , but so t oo wer e
t he Psal ms r ewor ked f r omEgypt i an hymns ( t hough t hey ar e at t r i but ed t o Ki ng
Davi d) . Even t he Ol d Test ament Book of Pr over bs - t he so- cal l ed ' wi se wor ds of
Sol omon' - was t r ansl at ed al most ver bat i mi nt o Hebr ew f r omt he wr i t i ngs of an
Egypt i an sage cal l ed Amenemope. These ar e now hel d at t he Br i t i sh Museum, and
ver se af t er ver se of t he Book of Pr over bs can be at t r i but ed t o t hi s Egypt i an
or i gi nal . I t has now been di scover ed t hat even t he wr i t i ngs of Amenemope wer e
ext r act ed f r oma f ar ol der wor k cal l ed The Wi sdomof Pt ah- hot ep, whi ch comes
f r ommor e t han 2, 000 year s bef or e t he t i me of Sol omon.

I n addi t i on t o t he Book of t he Dead and t he anci ent Wi sdomof Pt ah- hot ep,
var i ous ot her Egypt i an t ext s wer e used i n compi l i ng t he Ol d Test ament . These
i ncl ude t he Pyr ami d Text s and t he Cof f i n Text s, f r omwhi ch r ef er ences t o t he
Egypt i an gods wer e si mpl y t r ansposed t o r el at e t o t he Hebr ew god J ehovah.



I n Bl oodl i ne of t he Hol y Gr ai l I made t he poi nt t hat t he moder n st yl e of
Chr i st i ani t y, whi ch evol ved f r omt he Roman Chur ch i n t he 4t h cent ur y AD, was
act ual l y a cr eat ed ' hybr i d' - a r el i gi on based on t hemes f r omnumer ous ot her s,
i ncl udi ng, of cour se, J udai sm.

Now i t t r anspi r es t hat J udai smi t sel f was no l ess of a hybr i d i n t he ear l y days,
bei ng a composi t e of Egypt i an, Canaani t e and Mesopot ami an t r adi t i ons, wi t h t he
st or i es, hymns, pr ayer s and r i t ual s of t he var i ous and sundr y gods br ought
t oget her and r el at ed t o a newl y cont r i ved ' One God' concept .

What i s par t i cul ar l y i nt er est i ng i s t hat , hi st or i cal l y, t hi s was not f ul l y
cont r i ved i n t he t i me of Abr aham, nor even i n t he l at er t i me of Moses. I t di d
not happen unt i l t he 6t h cent ur y BC, when t ens of t housands of I sr ael i t es wer e
hel d capt i ve by Ki ng Nebuchadnezzar of Babyl on. Unt i l t hat t i me, t he Hebr ew and
I sr ael i t e r ecor ds r ef er r ed t o any number of gods and goddesses by i ndi vi dual
names, and under a gener al pl ur al cl assi f i cat i on of ' t he El ohi m' .

Thr ough some 500 year s f r omt he capt i vi t y, t he scr i pt ur es exi st ed onl y as a
ser i es of qui t e separ at e wr i t i ngs, and i t was not unt i l af t er t he t i me of J esus
t hat t hese wer e col l at ed i nt o a si ngl e vol ume. J esus hi msel f woul d never have
hear d of t he Ol d Test ament or t he Bi bl e, but t he scr i pt ur es t o whi ch he had
access i ncl uded many books t hat wer e not sel ect ed f or t he compi l at i on t hat we
know t oday.

St r angel y, t hough, some of t hese books ar e st i l l ment i oned i n t he moder n Bi bl e
t ext as bei ng i mpor t ant t o t he or i gi nal cul t ur e. They i ncl ude t he Book of t he
Lor d, t he Book of t he War s of J ehovah, and t he Book of J asher . Why wer e t hey not
i ncl uded? Qui t e si mpl y because t hei r cont ent di d not sui t t he new J ehovah- based
r el i gi on t hat was bei ng cr eat ed. J asher , f or exampl e, was t he Egypt i an- bor n son
of Cal eb; t he br ot her - i n- l aw t o t he f i r st I sr ael i t e j udge Ot hnei l ; and t he
appoi nt ed r oyal st af f - bear er t o Moses. I t i s gener al l y r eckoned t hat t he Book of
J asher ' s posi t i on i n t he Bi bl e shoul d be bet ween t he books of Deut er onomy and
J oshua, but i t was si dest epped by t he edi t or s because i t sheds a ver y di f f er ent
l i ght on t he sequence of event s at Mount Hor eb i n Si nai .

The f ami l i ar Exodus account expl ai ns t hat J ehovah i ssued i nst r uct i ons t o Moses
concer ni ng mast er s and ser vant s, covet ousness, nei ghbour l y behavi our , cr i me,
mar r i age, mor al i t y and many ot her i ssues i ncl udi ng t he al l - i mpor t ant r ul e of t he
Sabbat h, al ong wi t h t he Ten Commandment s.

But , i n J asher ( whi ch pr e- dat es t he Exodus wr i t i ngs) , t hese l aws and or di nances
ar e not conveyed t o Moses by J ehovah. I n f act , J ehovah i s not ment i oned at al l .
The new l aws, says t he Book of J asher , wer e communi cat ed t o Moses and t he
I sr ael i t es by J et hr o, Hi gh Pr i est of Mi di an and Lor d of t he Mount ai n. I n ef f ect ,
J et hr o was t he over al l gover nor of t he Si nai t empl e.

I n Hebr ew, t he t i t l e ' Lor d ( or Lof t y One) of t he Mount ai n' was t r ansl at ed as ' El
Shaddai ' , and t hi s i s par t i cul ar l y si gni f i cant f or t hat was pr eci sel y t he name
r el at ed t o Moses when he asked t he Lor d t o r eveal hi s i dent i t y. The Lor d sai d,
" I amt hat I am. I amhe t hat Abr ahamcal l ed ' El Shaddai ' " . " I amt hat I am"
event ual l y became t r ansposed t o t he name ' J ehovah' , but , as r el at ed i n J asher
( and as conf i r med i n Exodus when cor r ect l y r ead) , t hi s Lor d was not a dei f or m
god at al l . He was J et hr o t he El Shaddai , t he gr eat vul can and Mast er Cr af t sman
of t he Hat hor t empl e.

Apar t f r omt he f act t hat we ar e t aught about cer t ai n aspect s of t he Bi bl e t ext ,
I t hi nk i t i s f ai r t o say t hat not t oo many of us act ual l y st udy t he books
our sel ves. As a r esul t of t hi s, our per cei ved i mages ar e gener al l y t hose
conj ur ed by pi ct ur e- books and f i l ms. Hol l ywood, of cour se, has done us pr oud
wi t h i t s por t r ayal s of Moses on t he mount ai n and God bl ast i ng t he wor ds of t he
Ten Commandment s ont o t wo gr eat , bar el y por t abl e, gr ani t e sl abs. I n Exodus,
however , t her e i s no such depi ct i on, and t he Commandment s ar e sai d t o have been
wr i t t en down by Moses hi msel f ( at t he di ct at i on of t he Lor d) af t er he had br oken
t he f i r st t abl et s t hat he was gi ven.

As f or t he ot her par t of t he Si nai package, t he Tabl es of Test i mony, t hese ar e
st at ed i n t he t eachi ngs of t he Kabbal a and t he Mi dr ash t o have been hel d wi t hi n
a sacr ed gemst one whi ch Moses pl aced " i n t he pal mof hi s hand" . Thi s was t he
same Di vi ne St one of Wi sdomsai d t o have been i nher i t ed by Ki ng Sol omon. I n t he
ear l i er t ext s of Egypt i t was cal l ed t he ' Tabl et of Her mes' , whi ch embodi ed t he
wi sdomof Thot h.



Accor di ng t o t he r ecor ds of t he anci ent Dr agon Cour t of Egypt ( f ounded by Queen
Sobeknef r u i n 1785 BC) , an ear l y guar di an of t he Tabl e was Chem, t he Hi gh Pr i est
of Mendes. The wor d chem( or khame) means ' bl ackness' , and f r omt hi s r oot wor d
der i ved t he wor d ' al chemy' - t he sci ence of ext r act i ng l i ght f r omt he bl ackness.
To us, Chemi s per haps bet t er known as t he bi bl i cal Ham, t he gr andf at her of
Ni mr od, whose f ami l y was cur sed by t he Hebr ews because hi s hi st or i cal t r adi t i on
was i n conf l i ct wi t h t he emer gent J ehovah- based cul t ur e.

Reader s of Got hi c novel s and books about sor cer y wi l l , of cour se, r ecogni se t he
name Chemof Mendes. He i s of t en symbol i sed by a goat , whi ch was pr eci sel y t he
embl emof Hami n anci ent Egypt . The onl y di f f er ence i s t hat i n l at t er - day
Chr i st i an l or e t he goat i s meant t o be symbol i c of t he Devi l . What we now
di scover , however , i s t hat by f ol l owi ng t he st or y of Chemof Mendes we ar e l ed
di r ect l y t o t he Si nai t empl e and t o t he whi t e powder of gol d.

Mendes was a maj or ci t y of t he Egypt i an Del t a, and Chemwas t he t empl e' s
desi gnat ed Ar chon of t he 10t h Age of Capr i cor n. I t was i n t hi s Capr i cor n r egar d
t hat hi s symbol was a goat , gener al l y depi ct ed by an i nver t ed pent agr am. Thi s
f i ve- poi nt ed st ar has t wo upper most poi nt s, whi ch ar e t he hor ns of t he Goat of
Mendes. The t wo downwar d- sl opi ng si de poi nt s r epr esent t he ear s, and t he si ngl e
base- poi nt i s t he chi n and bear d.

When a pent agr ami s seen i n t hi s i nver t ed posi t i on, i t i s r egar ded as a mal e
embl em, but t he pent agr amst ar i s, of cour se, a f emal e devi ce ( a Venus symbol )
and i s usual l y shown wi t h t he si ngl e poi nt upper most .

I n t he pent agr am' s mal e posi t i on, Chemi s per sonal l y i dent i f i ed by an emer al d
j ewel set cent r al l y at t he meet i ng of t he hor ns. When t ur ned about , t he
pent agr amachi eves i t s f emal e st at us wi t h t he upper most si ngl e poi nt becomi ng
t he head of t he goddess. The si de poi nt s ar e now ar ms, whi l e t he t wi n poi nt s
( once t he hor ns) ar e now at t he base, bei ng t he l egs of t he goddess, wi t h t he
emer al d j ewel of Venus est abl i shed i n t he vul val posi t i on.

Somet i mes t he i nver t ed pent agr amof Chemi s shown wi t h f l ames r i si ng f r omt he
sacr ed j ewel bet ween t he hor ns. These f l ames ar e t r adi t i onal l y r ef er r ed t o as
' Ast r al Li ght ' . But when r ever sed i nt o t he Venus posi t i on, t he ut er i ne f l ames
ar e i dent i f i ed as ' St ar Fi r e' , t he l unar essence of t he goddess.

Fr omt he ear l i est t i mes, whet her r epr esent i ng Ast r al Li ght or St ar Fi r e, t he
pent agr amwas i ndi cat i ve of enl i ght enment . I t was associ at ed wi t h t he pr e- J ewi sh
Sabbat h - a r i t ual i st i c per i od of r ef l ect i on and exper i ence out si de of gener al
t oi l . For t hi s r eason, Chemof Mendes was cal l ed t he ' Sabbat i cal Goat ' - f r om
whi ch der i ved t oday' s use of t he wor d ' sabbat i cal ' i n academi c ci r cl es.

I n vi ew of t hi s age- ol d t r adi t i on, i t i s har dl y sur pr i si ng t hat t he pent agr am
and Sabbat i cal Goat became associ at ed wi t h het er odox Chr i st i ans ( l i ke t he
Cat har s of Languedoc) f r ommedi eval t i mes. I n cont r ast , t he or t hodox Chr i st i an
Chur ch endeavour ed t o over awe t he ol d wi sdomof t he myst er y school s by cr eat i ng
a hybr i d r el i gi on based upon sal vat i on f r omt he unknown - a sal vat i on t hat was
onl y at t ai ned t hr ough peopl e' s subj ugat i on t o t he aut hor i t y of t he bi shops. As
an out come, t he spi r i t ual l y based doct r i nes of t he Gnost i c movement ( whi ch
sought t o ' di scover ' t he unknown) wer e decl ar ed bl asphemous by t he I nqui si t i on,
whi l e t he pent agr amand t he goat wer e denounced as symbol s of bl ack magi c and
wi t chcr af t .

Fr omt hose t i mes ( even t o t he pr esent day i n some ci r cl es) , per sonal at t ai nment
and l ear ni ng whi ch does not conf or mt o t he bi shops' opi ni ons has been consi der ed
her et i cal . And i ndi vi dual l y acqui r ed wi sdombecame so f ear ed t hat t he Goat of
Mendes has been decr i ed as t he epi t ome of t he Devi l hi msel f . Thi s i s mani f est i n
a weal t h of t r ashy pr opagandi st novel s ( by Denni s Wheat l ey and ot her s) wher ei n
cr uci f i xes and hol y wat er abound as t he weapons used agai nst t he so- cal l ed
emi ssar y of Sat an.

Ham( or Chem) i s gi ven i n t he Ol d Test ament as a son of Noah, but i n t he ol dest
r ecor ds he i s cor r ect l y i dent i f i ed ( al ong wi t h J aphet ) as bei ng a son of t he
gr eat Vul can and gol dsmi t h Tubal - cai n who i s bet t er known t o hi st or i ans as Ki ng
Meskal am- dug, t he Her o of t he Good Land.

I n t he ear l y l or e of Pal est i ne, Chemwas synonymous wi t h a cer t ai n Azazel of
Capr i cor n who ( accor di ng t o t he Book of Enoch) made known t o men " al l t he
met al s, and t he ar t of wor ki ng t hem, and t he use of ant i mony" . Ant i mony i s t he
bl ack el ement ot her wi se known as ' st i bi um' . Thi s i s an essent i al i ngr edi ent of
t he pr epar at or y al chemi cal pr ocess when pr oduci ng t he Phi l osopher s' St one. I n
t he anci ent Ar ab wor l d, ant i mony was cal l ed kohl , f r omwhi ch der i ves t he wor d
' coal ' , meani ng ' t hat whi ch i s bl ack' . The r el at ed wor d ' al cohol ' st ems f r omt he
Ar abi c al - kohul - t he hi ghl y r ef i ned ' phi l osophi cal mer cur y' pr epar ed f r om
spi r i t s of wi ne r ect i f i ed over ant i mony.

Azazel of Capr i cor n act ual l y appear s i n t he Bi bl e, but not i n t he aut hor i sed
Engl i sh- l anguage t r ansl at i on. I n t he Vul gat e Book of Levi t i cus t her e i s an ear l y
r ef er ence t o t he cust omof At onement , and i t st at es t hat Aar on shal l cast l ot s
upon t wo goat s, " one f or t he Lor d, and t he ot her f or Azazel " . That whi ch f el l t o
t he l ot of t he Lor d was t o be sacr i f i ced as a ' si n of f er i ng' , and t he ot her was
t o be sent i nt o t he wi l der ness as an ' at onement ' .

The mor e f ami l i ar Engl i sh t r ansl at i on i s somewhat conf usi ng, f or t he name
' Azazel ' has been suppl ant ed by t he wor d ' scapegoat ' . The r eason f or t he
subst i t ut i on was si mpl y t hat t he or i gi nal sequence made i t qui t e cl ear t hat
Hebr ew of f er i ngs wer e made bot h t o J ehovah and t o Chem- Azazel , whi l e t he Book of
Enoch ( whi ch was excl uded f r omt he Ol d Test ament ) dr ew r eader s' at t ent i on t o t he
di r ect l i nk bet ween Azazel and her met i c al chemy.

I n t he t r adi t i on of t he Rosi cr uci an myst er y school s, t he wr i t i ngs of Chem( t he
Tabul a Smar agdi na Her met i s) wer e r ecor ded as " The most anci ent monument of t he
Chal deans concer ni ng t he Phi l osopher s' St one" . Bei ng associ at ed wi t h t he wi sdom
of Thot h ( or Her mes) , t hey wer e def i ned as her met i c t eachi ngs, and t hey wer e
di r ect l y l i nked t o t he f i r e al chemy of pyr ami d const r uct i on.

The ver y name ' Her mes' der i ves f r omt he wor d her ma, whi ch means ' a pi l e of
st ones' , and t he Gr eat Pyr ami d was cal l ed t he ' Sanct uar y of Thot h' . The wor d
pyr , f r omwhi ch der i ve ' pyr o- ' , ' pyr e' and ' pyr ami d' , act ual l y means ' f i r e' -
and t he pyr ami ds wer e so cal l ed because t hey wer e ' f i r e- begot t en' .



Thi s l eads us t o one of t he gr eat unanswer ed quest i ons: How di d t hey bui l d t he
pyr ami ds? Wer e t he t housands of massi ve bl ocks r ai sed t o gr eat hei ght s wi t h such
accur acy by hundr eds of t housands of sl aves usi ng not hi ng but r opes and r amps
over an undef i ned per i od of t i me, as i s t he common specul at i on? Cer t ai nl y not .
To const r uct an i ncl i ned pl ane t o t he t op of t he Gr eat Pyr ami d at a gr adi ent of
1: 10 woul d have r equi r ed a r amp 4, 800 f eet ( appr ox. 1, 463 met r es) l ong, wi t h a
vol ume t hr ee t i mes gr eat er t han t hat of t he Pyr ami d i t sel f .

As we saw ear l i er , t he powder of t he hi ghwar d f i r e- st one i s a monat omi c
super conduct or . I t i s exot i c mat t er wi t h a gr avi t at i onal at t r act i on of l ess t han
zer o. Recent exper i ment s wi t h t hi s amazi ng whi t e powder of gol d have pr oven
t hat , under cer t ai n condi t i ons, t he subst ance can wei gh l ess t han not hi ng and
can be made t o di sappear i nt o an unknown di mensi on. The most i nt er est i ng qual i t y
of t he powder , however , i s t hat i t r i des upon t he Ear t h' s magnet i c f i el d, so
t hat when i t i s i n a zer o- gr avi t y st at e i t i s capabl e of t r ansposi ng i t s own
wei ght l essness t o i t s host , t her eby f aci l i t at i ng l evi t at i onal power s. Thi s host
mi ght be a l abor at or y pan, a cont ai ner , or a t abl e - or i t coul d j ust as easi l y
be an enor mous bl ock of st one!

The age- ol d t r adi t i on r el at es t hat i n t he secr et r eposi t or y of t he Ki ng' s
Chamber wi t hi n t he Gr eat Pyr ami d t he bui l der s had pl aced " i nst r ument s of i r on,
and ar ms whi ch r ust not , and gl ass whi ch mi ght be bended and yet not br oken, and
st r ange spel l s" . But what di d t he f i r st expl or er s f i nd, havi ng t unnel l ed t hei r
way i nt o t he seal ed chamber ? The onl y f ur ni t ur e was a l i dl ess, hol l owed st one
cof f er , and i t cont ai ned not a body but a l ayer of a myst er i ous powder y
subst ance. Thi s has been super f i ci al l y det er mi ned t o be gr ai ns of f el dspar and
mi ca, whi ch ar e bot h mi ner al s of t he al umi ni umsi l i cat e gr oup.

Dur i ng t he cour se of t he r ecent whi t e powder r esear ch, al umi ni umand si l i ca wer e
t wo of t he const i t uent el ement s r eveal ed by convent i onal anal ysi s of a gr anul ar
sampl e t hat was known t o be a 100 per cent pl at i num- gr oup compound.

St andar d l abor at or y t est i ng i s done by st r i ki ng a sampl e wi t h a DC ar c f or 15
seconds at a Sun- sur f ace heat of 5, 500 Cent i gr ade. However , wi t h t he whi t e
powder , a cont i nuat i on of t he bur n- t i me way beyond t he nor mal t est i ng pr ocedur e
r eveal ed t he nobl e pl at i nummet al s of whi ch t he subst ance t r ul y consi st ed.

I t i s because of t he l i mi t at i ons pl aced on t he convent i onal t est i ng sequence
t hat f i ve per cent by dr y wei ght of our br ai n t i ssue i s sai d t o be car bon,
wher eas mor e r i gor ous anal ysi s r eveal s i t as t he pl at i nummet al s i r i di umand
r hodi umi n t he hi gh- spi n st at e.

The Ki ng' s Chamber was, i n f act , cont r i ved as a super conduct or , capabl e of
t r anspor t i ng t he Phar aoh i nt o anot her di mensi on of space- t i me. And i t was her e
t hat t he Phar aoh' s Ri t e of Passage was admi ni st er ed i n accor dance wi t h t he Book
of t he Dead.

The key t o t hi s Ri t e of Passage i s def i ned by a si ngl e coni cal i nscr i pt i on near
t he ent r ance t o t he Chamber . Thi s hi er ogl yphi c symbol - t he onl y ver i f i abl e
hi er ogl yph on t he whol e of t he Gi zeh Pl at eau, and t he ver y same as appear ed many
t i mes at t he Si nai mount ai n t empl e - r eads, qui t e si mpl y, ' Br ead' .



I n t he cont ext of t hi s t al k, we have st epped beyond t he bounds of t he Bi bl e t o
wi t ness t he al chemi cal and sci ent i f i c pr ocess whi ch f aci l i t at ed t he genesi s of
t he Gr ai l Ki ngs. Thi s l i ne of successi on f r omCai n, t hr ough Egypt t o Ki ng Davi d
and onwar d t o J esus, was pur pose- br ed t o be t he ear t hl y Pur veyor s of t he Li ght .
They wer e t he t r ue Sons of t he Gods, who wer e f ed f i r st l y on Anunnaki St ar Fi r e
f r omabout 3800 BC and, subsequent l y, on ' hi gh- spi n' met al suppl ement s f r om
about 2000 BC. I n shor t , t hey wer e br ed t o be l eader s of humanki nd, and t hey
wer e bot h ment al l y and physi cal l y mai nt ai ned i n t he ' hi ghwar d' st at e: t he
ul t i mat e di mensi on of t he mi ssi ng 44 per cent - t he di mensi on of t he Or bi t of
Li ght , or t he Pl ane of Shar on.

Onl y dur i ng t he past 150 year s or so, and mor e speci f i cal l y dur i ng t he past 80
year s, have t he gr eat st or ehouses of Egypt i an, Mesopot ami an, Syr i an and
Canaani t e r ecor d been unear t hed f r ombeneat h t he deser t sands. Fi r st - hand
document ar y evi dence f r ombef or e Bi bl e t i mes has now emer ged on st one, cl ay,
par chment and papyr us, and t hese many t ens of t housands of document s bear
wi t ness t o a f ar mor e exci t i ng hi st or y t han we wer e ever t ol d.

Had t hese r ecor ds been avai l abl e t hr oughout t he gener at i ons, t he concept of a
par t i cul ar r ace enj oyi ng a si ngl e Di vi ne r evel at i on woul d never have ar i sen, and
t he excl usi vi t y of J ehovah - whi ch has bl i nded us f or t he l ongest t i me, set t i ng
us i n war l i ke f ashi on agai nst t hose of ot her f ai t hs who f ol l ow t hei r own
t r adi t i ons - woul d never have t aken such an ar r ogant hol d.

Gr adual l y, as new di scover i es ar e made, i t i s evi dent t hat we ar e now emer gi ng
f r omt he dar kness of our pr econcei ved but unf ounded not i ons. Even so, our
cent ur i es of Chur ch- l ed i ndoct r i nat i on make i t ver y di f f i cul t t o di scar d t he
r est r i ct i ve dogma of i nbr ed t hi r d- hand t r adi t i on i n f avour of a gr eat er
enl i ght enment f r omt hose who wer e t her e at t he t i me.

The t r ul y i nspi r i ng pr ospect i s t hat t he l ear ni ng cur ve has st i l l not ended.
J ust as a si ngl e gl aci er i s but a cont i nuat i on of age- ol d act i vi t y, so t oo ar e
t he anci ent wi sdoms t hat now f al l t o us one by one, wi t h each new f acet of
l ear ni ng r eady t o be st acked upon t he f or mer knowl edge.

For t unat el y, t he dawn of consci ousness i s al r eady behi nd us and, al t hough some
wi l l choose t o l ook backwar ds beyond i t s vei l , many wi l l st ep wi t h vi gour i nt o
t he new mi l l enni umt o wi t ness a br i ght new sunr i se - a r evel at i on of unbounded
possi bi l i t y and a r est or at i on of our t r ue uni ver sal i nher i t ance.