Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Of the 21 APEC member economies, 18 submitted stock-take responses - Australia, Brunei Darussalam,
Canada, China, Chile, Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong China, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New
Zealand, Peru, Republic of Korea, Russia, Singapore, USA, and Vietnam..
ii.
2. DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Each member economy already has its own national policy or guidelines for coordinating disaster response and
recovery with variations in institutional strength and internal mechanism. This mechanism lies in legal
frameworks, organization/agencies responsible for disaster management, disaster management partners, and
international frameworks. For some members such as Australia, Canada, Mexico, and USA the legal framework
lies within both national and federal/state level. While others have national law/act/policy or guidelines applicable
to all regions of their economy. Variation also takes place in the type of law. Some member economies opt for
one single and comprehensive law regulating disaster management, e.g. Brunei Darussalam, Chile, Indonesia,
Malaysia (in the drafting process), Peru, and Singapore. Attention should be given to this single law of disaster
management to ensure it covers all phases of disaster management including mitigation, preparedness,
response, and recovery, and encompasses relevant and related areas such as marine pollution, industrial
accidents, land conservation, water supply, measures for floods, earthquake, etc.
In international framework, all member economies have adopted The Hyogo Framework of Action (HFA) 20052015. Monitoring should be continued to assure the parallel development of plans and strategies on disaster
reduction and emergency preparedness in all member economies. Some member economies that have more
advanced institutional capacity may provide training to others, e.g. Australia to give training for National Disaster
Management Offices in disaster and risk management; and in disaster preparedness, response and
coordination.
3. DISASTER COORDINATION
Each economy has developed its own system of disaster coordination. Many member economies also take an
international approach to emergency management with an extensive number of international activities
undertaken bilaterally, regionally and globally.
Member economies have varied coordinating platforms for preparedness between disaster management
authorities. Some have it under a government body (Ministry or Department), like Department of Homeland
Security (USA), Department of Internal Affairs (New Zealand), Federal Attorney General's Department (Australia),
Ministry of Home Affairs (Brunei, Singapore), Ministry of the Interior (Chile, Mexico), and Prime Ministers
Department (Malaysia). Some others have inter-agency coordinating body (ad-hoc) such as China, Chinese
Taipei, HK China, Japan, Peru, Republic of Korea, and Vietnam. Only two member economies have a single
national authority responsible for disaster management (Canada and Indonesia). Trainings on logistical
arrangements and emergency relief assistance are necessary as most member economies, due to geographical
consideration, have two to three tiers of disaster response mechanism (national, provincial, municipal) except for
smaller economies such as Brunei Darussalam and Hong Kong China.
As for early warning centers, most member economies have more than one center to address respective threat.
Few others, though, like Brunei, Japan, and Korea have one agency that provides comprehensive monitoring of
various natural phenomena, including typhoons, earthquakes and tsunamis . Malaysia indicated its capacity in
multi-hazard early warning centre (Malaysian Meteorological Department) which disseminate information and
warnings through faxes, fixed line phone and mobile short messaging system to the relevant disaster
management agencies and electronic and print media to the public.
In early response mechanism, most economies have Incident Command System in place when disaster occurs,
although only two economies (Australia and Malaysia) indicate their capacity to provide training. Other member
economies can leverage from their capacities through Training of Trainers on Disaster Management and
International Secondment and Exchange from Australia and Malaysia. Only one economy that have cooperative
and collaborative work with non-state sector in its early response mechanism; Australia. Australian Red Cross is
responsible for NRIS (computer-based national disaster victim registration and inquiry system).
On mechanism for international support in a catastrophic disaster event, five economies appoint Ministry of
Foreign Affairs as the sole channel of accepting/offering international support.
x.
xi.
xii.
xiii.
xiv.
xv.
xvi.
Peru
Republic of Korea
Vietnam
Singapore
Mexico
Russia
Chile
5. BEST PRACTICE
Gender/Women
Some economies have successfully integrated gender conscious disaster prevention into their disaster
risk management practices, in the forms of group discussion and training of women community leaders on
disaster preparedness (Malaysia), inclusion of women's role in the policy making process and disaster prevention
plans (Japan), improvement of information collection system by incorporating gender-sensitive measure such as
households survey (Chile). This is also a training need chosen by 5 economies.
Tourism
Tourism infrastructure and services are subject to hazard risk management and occupational health and
safety management just like all other aspects of the economy and community services. PR China has an
excellent practice in applying insurance for tourists when they travel in groups. Most economies have advanced
system of travel safety information to their people travelling, working and living abroad.
Critical Infrastructure
In case of disaster situations, basic services such as transportation and telecommunication must retain
their functionality. All economies have their own arrangements to ensure this. These arrangements include
developing system for emergencies, making communication plans, conducting training of communication and
taking other necessary measures. Seven economies chose this as one of the training needs.
6. TRAINING PROGRAMS
APEC member economies were asked to identify their training needs from a list of thirty possible areas. Of the
eighteen economies that returned the stocktake, twelve identified specific training needs. Of those twelve, ten
were developing economies. The responses identified a range of high-priority areas for training and several
favoured training approaches.
The priority areas identified for capacity building and training initiatives included:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
When referring to disaster management, respondents variously meant: legal and/or policy frameworks; divisions
of responsibilities among internal agencies; inter-agency cooperation, including interaction between government,
non-government agencies, business and the community; critical infrastructure; and, and early response systems.
The preferred training approaches included:
1. Sharing Disaster Management Best Practices (8)
2. Training of Trainers on Disaster Management (7)
3. International Secondment and Exchange (7)
TFEP members listed the following
training capacities in their economies, which could potentially provide the curricula, knowledge, specialists for
APEC initiatives:
1.Community Emergency Preparedness (CEPP): Malaysia, Australia
2.Community Based Disaster Management: Malaysia