Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HR
HR
Turnover rate
Computing Absenteeism Rates
Chapter 5
Selection
The process of choosing individuals who have relevant qualifications to fill existing or
projected job openings.
Selection Considerations
Person-job fit: job analysis identifies required individual competencies (KSAOs) for
job success.
Person-organization fit: the degree to which individuals are matched to the culture
and values of the organization.
Steps of the Selection Process
1- Completion of application form
2- Initial interview in HR department
3- Employment tests
4- Background investigation
5- Preliminary selection in HR department
6- Supervisory or team interview
7- Medical examination/ drug testing
8- Hiring decision
Obtaining Reliable and Valid Information
Reliability
The degree to which interviews, tests, and other selection procedures yield comparable data
over time and alternative measures.
Validity
Degree to which a test or selection procedure measures a persons attributes.
Approaches to validation
Criterion-related validity
Content validity
Construct validity
Criterion-related Validity
The extent to which a selection tool predicts, or significantly correlates with, important
elements of work behavior.
A high score indicates high job performance potential; a low score is predictive of low job
performance.
Types Of Criterion-related Validity
1. Concurrent Validity
The extent to which test scores (or other predictor information) match criterion data obtained
at about the same time from current employees.
High or low-test scores for employees match their respective job performance.
2. Predictive Validity
The extent to which applicants test scores match criterion data obtained from those
applicants/ employees after they have been on the job for some indefinite period.
A high or low-test score at hiring predicts high or low job performance at a point in time
after hiring.
3. Cross-validation
Verifying the results obtained from a validation study by administering a test or test battery
to a different sample (drawn from the same population).
Validity (or Correlation) Coefficient (r)
A number ranging from 0.00, denoting a complete absence of relationship, to 1.00 and to -
1.00, indicating a perfect positive and perfect negative relationship, respectively.
Content validity
The extent to which a selection instrument, such as a test, adequately samples the knowledge
and skills needed to perform a particular job.
Example: typing tests, drivers license examinations
Construct validity
The extent to which a selection tool measures a theoretical construct or trait.
Are difficult to validate
Example: creative arts tests, honesty tests
Sources of Information about Job Candidates
Application Forms
Online Applications
Biographical Information Blanks (BIB)
Background Investigations
Integrity and Honesty Tests
Graphology
Medical Examinations
Employment Tests
Interviews
Employment Test
An objective and standardized measure of a sample of behavior that is used to gauge a
persons knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics (KSAOs) in relation to other
individuals.
Classification of Employment Tests
1- Cognitive ability tests
2- Personality and interest inventories
3- Physical ability tests
4- Job knowledge tests
5- Job sample tests
1. Cognitive Ability Tests
Aptitude tests
Measures of a persons capacity to learn or acquire skills.
Achievement tests
Measures of what a person knows or can do right now.
2. Personality and Interest Inventories
Big Five personality factors:
Extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience.
3. Physical Ability Tests
Must be related to the essential functions of the job.
4. Job Knowledge Tests
An achievement test that measures a persons level of understanding about a particular job.
5. Work Sample Tests
Require the applicant to perform tasks that are actually a part of the work required on the job
Interviewing Methods
1- The nondirective interview
2- The structured interview
3- The situational interview
4- The behavioral description interview
5- The panel interview
6- The computer interview
1. Nondirective Interview
The applicant determines the course of the discussion, while the interviewer refrains from
influencing the applicants remarks.
2. Structured Interview
An interview in which a set of standardized questions having an established set of answers is
used.
3. Situational Interview
An interview in which an applicant is given a hypothetical incident and asked how he or she
would respond to it.
4. Behavioral Description Interview (BDI)
An interview in which an applicant is asked questions about what he or she actually did in a
given situation.
5. Panel Interview
An interview in which a board of interviewers questions and observes a single candidate.
6. Computer Interview
Using a computer program that requires candidates to answer a series of questions tailored to
the job.
Answers are compared either with an ideal profile or with profiles developed on the basis of
other candidates responses.
7. Video interviews
Using video conference technologies to evaluate job candidates technical abilities, energy
level, appearance, and the like before incurring the costs of a face-to-face meeting.
Basic Approaches to Selection
1- Clinical (personal judgment) approach
2- Statistical approach
Compensatory Model
Permits a high score in one area to make up for a low score in another area.
Multiple Cutoff Model
Requires an applicant to achieve a minimum level of proficiency on all selection
dimensions.
Multiple Hurdle Model
Only applicants with sufficiently high scores at each selection stage go on to
subsequent stages in the selection process.
Chapter 6
Training
Effort initiated by an organization to foster learning among its members.
Tends to be narrowly focused and oriented toward short-term performance concerns.
Development
Effort that is oriented more toward broadening an individuals skills for the future
responsibilities
Phases of the System Approach
1- Conducting the needs assessment
2- Designing the training program
3- Implementing the training program
4- Evaluating the training program
Phase 1: Conducting the Needs Assessment
Organization Analysis
An examination of the environment, strategies, and resources of the
organization to determine where training emphasis should be placed.
Task Analysis
The process of determining what the content of a training program should be on
the basis of a study of the tasks and duties involved in the job.
Person Analysis
A determination of the specific individuals who need training.
Competency assessment
Analysis of the sets of skills and knowledge needed for decision-oriented and
knowledge-intensive jobs.
Phase 2: Designing the Training Program
a- Instructional objectives
b- Trainee readiness and motivation
c- Principles of learning
d- Characteristics of instructors
a. Instructional Objectives
Represent the desired outcomes of a training program
Provide a basis for choosing methods and materials and for selecting the means
for assessing whether the instruction will be successful.
b. Trainee readiness and motivation
Strategies for Creating a Motivated Training Environment:
Use positive reinforcement.
Eliminate threats and punishment.
Be flexible.
Have participants set personal goals.
Design interesting instruction.
Break down physical and psychological obstacles to learning.
c. Principle of learning
Focus on learning and transfer
1- Goal setting
2- Meaningfulness of presentation
3- Modeling
4- Individual differences
Focus on method and process
1- Active practice and repetition
2- Whole-versus-part learning
3- Massed-versus-distributed learning
4- Feedback and knowledge of progress
5- Rewards and reinforcement
d. Characteristics of Instructors
Knowledge of subject
Adaptability
Sincerity
Sense of humor
Interest
Clear instructions
Individual assistance
Enthusiasm
Phase 3: Implementing the Training Program
Training Methods for Non-managerial Employees
On-the-Job Training (OJT)
Apprenticeship Training
Cooperative Training, Internships, and Governmental Training
Classroom Instruction
Programmed Instruction
Audiovisual Methods
Computer-based Training and E-Learning
Simulation Method
On-the-job training (OJT)
Method by which employees are given hands-on experience with instructions from their
supervisor or other trainer.
Apprenticeship training
A system of training in which a worker entering the skilled trades is given thorough
instruction and experience, both on and off the job, in the practical and theoretical aspects of
the work.
Cooperative Training
A training program that combines practical on-the-job experience with formal educational
classes.
Internship Programs
Are jointly sponsored by colleges, universities, and other organizations that offer students
the opportunity to gain real-life experience while allowing them to find out how they will
perform in work organizations.
Classroom Instruction
Enables the maximum number of trainees to be handled by the minimum number of
instructors.
Blended learninglectures and demonstrations are combined with films, DVDs, and
videotapes or computer instruction.
Programmed Instruction
Referred to as self-directed learninginvolves the use of books, manuals, or computers to
break down subject matter content into highly organized, logical sequences that demand
continuous response on the part of the trainee.
Audiovisual Methods
Technologies, such as CDs and DVDs, are used to teach skills and procedures by illustrating
the steps in a procedure or interpersonal relations.
E-Learning
Learning that takes place via electronic media such web and computer-based training (CBT)
Allows the firm to bring the training to employees
Allows employees to customize their own learning in their own time and space
Simulation
The simulation method emphasizes realism in equipment and its operation at minimum cost
and maximum safety.
Used when it is either impractical or unwise to train employees on the actual equipment used
on the job.
Training Methods for Management Development
On-the-Job Experiences
Seminars and Conferences
Case Studies
Management Games
Role Playing
Behavior Modeling
Phase 4: Evaluating the Training Program
Reactions
Learning
Behavior
Results
Chapter 7
Performance Appraisal
A process, typically performed annually by a supervisor for a subordinate, designed to help
employees understand their roles, objectives, expectations, and performance success.
Purposes of Performance Appraisal
It gives the employee the opportunity to discuss performance regularly with their
supervisor.
Provides the supervisor with a mean to identify the strengths and weaknesses of an
employee.
Provides a format enabling the supervisor to recommend a specific program designed
to help an employee improve performance.
Provides a basis for salary recommendations.
Reasons Appraisal Programs Sometimes Fail
Manager lacks information concerning an employee's actual performance.
Standards by which to evaluate an employee's performance are unclear.
Manager does not take the appraisal seriously.
Manager is not honest during the evaluation.
Manager lacks appraisal skills.
Employee does not receive feedback.
Manager feel that little or no benefit will be delivered from the time and energy spent
in the process.
Manager dislike the face to face confrontation of appraisal interviews.
Performance Standards Characteristics
Strategic Relevance: Individual standards directly relate to strategic goals.
Criterion Deficiency: Standards capture all of an individuals contributions.
Criterion Contamination: Performance capability is not reduced by external factors-
factors outside an employees control can influence his or her performance.
Reliability (Consistency): Standards are quantifiable, measurable, and stable.
Sources of Performance Appraisal
Manager and/or Supervisor
Appraisal done by an employees manager and reviewed by a manager one level
higher.
Self-Appraisal
Appraisal done by the employee being evaluated, generally on an appraisal form
completed by the employee prior to the performance interview.
Subordinate Appraisal
Appraisal of a superior by an employee, which is more appropriate for
developmental than for administrative purposes.
Peer Appraisal
Appraisal by fellow employees, compiled into a single profile for use in an
interview conducted by the employees manager.
Team Appraisal
based on TQM concepts, that recognizes team accomplishment rather than
individual performance
Customer Appraisal
A performance appraisal that, like team appraisal, is based on TQM concepts
and seeks evaluation from both external and internal customers
Putting All Together : 360-Degree Appraisal
Providing the employee with an accurate view of their performance by getting
input from all angels: supervisors, peers, subordinates, customers and the like.
PROS of 360 degree appraisal
The system is more comprehensive in that responses are gathered from multiple
perspectives.
Quality of information is better. (Quality of respondents is more important than
quantity.)
It complements TQM initiatives by emphasizing internal/external customers and
teams.
It may lessen bias/prejudice since feedback comes from more people, not one
individual.
Feedback from peers and others may increase employee self-development.
CONS of 360 degree appraisal
The system is complex in combining all the responses.
Feedback can be intimidating and cause resentment if employee feels the respondents
have ganged up.
There may be conflicting opinions, though they may all be accurate from the
respective standpoints.
The system requires training to work effectively.
Employees may collude or game the system by giving invalid evaluations to one
another.
Appraisers may not be accountable if their evaluations are anonymous.
Training Performance Appraisers
Common rater-related errors:
Error of central tendency
Leniency or strictness errors
Similar-to-me errors
Recency errors
Contrast and halo errors
Error of Central Tendency
A rating error in which all employees are rated about average.
Leniency or Strictness Error
A rating error in which the appraiser tends to give all employees either
unusually high or unusually low ratings.
Recency Error
A rating error in which appraisal is based largely on an employees most recent
behavior rather than on behavior throughout the appraisal period
Contrast Error
A rating error in which an employees evaluation is biased either upward or
downward because of comparison with another employee just previously
evaluated.
Similar-to-Me Error
An error in which an appraiser inflates the evaluation of an employee because
of a mutual personal connection.
Rating Error Training
Observe other managers making errors
Actively participate in discovering their own errors
Practice job-related tasks to reduce the errors they tend to make
Feedback Skills Training
Communicating effectively
Diagnosing the root causes of performance problems
Setting goals and objectives
Performance Appraisal Methods
a. Trait Methods:
Graphic Rating Scale
Mixed Standard Scale
Forced-Choice
Essay
b. Behavioral methods:
Critical Incident
Behavioral Checklist
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)
Behavior Observation Scale (BOS)
a. Trait Methods:
Graphic Rating-Scale Method
A trait approach to performance appraisal whereby each employee is rated
according to a scale of individual characteristics.
Mixed-Standard Scale Method
An approach to performance appraisal similar to other scale methods but based
on comparison with (better than, equal to, or worse than) a standard.
Forced-Choice Method
Requires the rater to choose from statements designed to distinguish between
successful and unsuccessful performance.
1. ______ a) Works hard _____ b) Works quickly
2. ______ a) Shows initiative _____ b) Is responsive to customers
3. ______ a) Produces poor quality _____ b) Lacks good work habits
Essay Method
Requires the rater to compose a statement describing employee behavior
b. Behavioral methods:
Critical Incident Method
Critical incident
An unusual event that denotes superior or inferior employee
performance in some part of the job
The manager keeps a log or diary for each employee throughout the
appraisal period and notes specific critical incidents related to how well
they perform.
Behavioral Checklist Method
The rater checks statements on a list that the rater believes are characteristic
of the employees performance or behavior.
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)
Consists of a series of vertical scales, one for each dimension of job
performance; typically developed by a committee that includes both
subordinates and managers.
Behavior Observation Scale (BOS)
A performance appraisal that measures the frequency of observed behavior
(critical incidents).
Preferred over BARS for maintaining objectivity, distinguishing good
performers from poor performers, providing feedback, and identifying
training needs.
Results Methods
Evaluate employee accomplishments according to the results they achieve through their
work.
Productivity Measures
Appraisals based on quantitative measures (e.g., sales volume) that directly link
what employees accomplish to results beneficial to the organization. People are
evaluated on the basis of their sales volume or the number of units they produce
Criterion contamination
Focus on short-term results
Management by Objectives (MBO)
A philosophy of management that rates performance on the basis of employee
achievement of goals set by mutual agreement of employee and manager.