Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Be aware
of RETLA
clauses in
bills of lading
Page 7
Sign up for
the Mariner
Attitude
Survey
Page 13
ARMED
GUARDS
Page 16 -17
Page 10-13
| New team member 13
| New MRM licensees 13
| Out and about with MRM 14-15
LEGAL | Update 21
| Club quiz 35
| Club calendar 36
www.swedishclub.com
Underlying drivers
of casualty cost escalation
Lars Rhodin
Managing Director
Lars A. Malm
Director,
Risk & Operations
Photo: iStockphoto
Joakim Enstrm
Be aware of
RETLA clauses
in bills of lading
Director,
Corporate Legal
Photo: Bananastock
Anders Leissner
FD&D | Charterparties
Simon Chumas
Partner,
Holman Fenwick Willan LLP, London
Jenny Salmon
Associate,
Holman Fenwick Willan LLP, London
Simon Chumas and Jenny Salmon advise in relation to wet and dry shipping
and insurance disputes, acting principally for shipowners and their insurers.
They specialise in the investigation and
handling of all claims (wet and dry)
arising out of marine casualties. In addition, they deal with the various contractual disputes which regularly arise
from casualties. They also handle both
hull and P&I marine insurance coverage disputes.
Holman Fenwick Willan is an international law firm and one of the worlds
leading specialists in shipping, maritime transportation, insurance, reinsurance and trade. Holman Fenwick
Willans shipping lawyers provide a
comprehensive service to the global
maritime business community, with
over 200 lawyers worldwide specialising in maritime law.
owners
YLA
in this case makes clear that, where a charterparty contains such a clause, an owner
cannot declare a charterparty frustrated
where the cost of repair will be less than
the vessels insured value. Instead, the shipowner must repair the vessel and continue
to perform the balance of the charterparty,
even if the repairs cost more than the repaired vessel will be worth such that no
prudent owner would otherwise undertake
the repairs.
The decision creates uncertainty, as the
circumstances in which the vessels insured
value will be taken as the benchmark for
frustration are not clear. It is possible that
the Kyla principle will apply in every
case where there is a continuing warranty
to insure and charterers are aware that the
vessels H&M insurance is likely to be on
an insured value basis, even where the vessels insured value is not stated in the charterparty.
Conclusion
Shipowners should be cautious when they
see a continuing warranty to insure in a
proposed time charterparty which specifies the vessels hull and machinery insured
value. In the event of a casualty, an owner
might find that as a result of the warranty,
he has to carry out commercially uneconomical repairs to a vessel even one nearing the end of her trading life.
Concerned shipowners should take legal
advice on any such proposed clause and
consider with their lawyers whether the
wording of the clause can be amended to
avoid such an outcome. In any given case,
the question of whether a clause or clauses
amount to an allocation of the risk of damage to the vessel to an owner will depend
on the construction of the charterparty as
a whole.
The owners of the Kyla are seeking to
appeal the decision. Simon Chumas and
Jenny Salmon acted for the owners in this
case.
Mats Segolson
Know
your
limits
Lucky A
Happy B
USD 5 million
USD 65 million
Table 1.
Convention
1957
1976
1996
Ship
Lucky A
2,333,450 SDR
(about USD 3.5 M)
5,718,500 SDR
(about USD 8.6 M)
13,700,000 SDR
(about USD 20.5 M)
Happy B
1,133,390 SDR
(about USD 1.7 M)
2,922,500 SDR
(about USD 4.4 M)
7,000,000 SDR
(about USD 11.5 M)
Table 2.
10
Photo: TSC
claims
ship and her cargo. The size of the limitation fund is calculated in the same way but
with global limitation, of course, the fund
is actually established in court and administered by the applicable procedures of that
court.
In the above scenario, there are no personal injury claims and the calculation
would be for property claims only. In case
there had been personal injury claims those
claims would have been treated separately
and calculated differently for the purpose
of limitation. Assuming that Lucky A
has a GT of 35,000 and Happy B a GT of
17,000, the limitation amounts would, respectively, for each ship and for the three
above limitation regimes, be as illustrated
above (table 2).
Liability for the collision
Who is likely to be the receiving party and
the paying party of the two ships? It is important to remember that in many cases
the collision liability between the ships
will often have a significant impact on who
will be on the paying and receiving end, in
particular when the claim amounts on each
side are more comparable.
An assessment of the collision liability is
made based on the facts and circumstances
of the collision. A study of the vessels voy-
age data recorder (VDR) and other contemporaneous evidence should give a relatively good idea of this liability.
Let us assume that liability is 60/40 in
favour of Happy B. The liability apportionment is applied to the claim amounts of
each ship. In the above example Happy B
is liable for 40% of Lucky As loss of USD
5 million, i.e. USD 2 million. Lucky A, on
the other hand, is liable for 60% of Happy
Bs loss of USD 65 million, i.e. USD 39
million. The two claims are then set-off
leaving a balance of USD 37 million to
Happy B. Of course that sum would be
capped by any limitation Lucky A may rely
on. This is how liability and limitation are
normally allocated and applied but it is advisable to be aware that under some legal
regimes there may be a somewhat different
approach, so do not always assume that the
process will always be the same.
It should also be considered whether
limitation against either party can be broken but suffice here to say that in the vast
majority of cases you cannot break limitation. Therefore, it is clear that Lucky A will
be the paying party and the question is just
how much Lucky A has to pay given limitation.
continues on page 12
11
Are there any grounds for breaking limitation and if so where is this best tried? It is
generally very difficult, if not virtually impossible, to break limitation but it may be
slightly easier under the 1957 regime.
12
Consider attempting to establish jurisdiction by other means than a ship arrest, for
example where the owning company is registered or where you already have dispute
with say a cargo interest or a sub-charterer.
13
If the other side has started an action already in one country and you are contemplating starting proceedings elsewhere, will
the other country likely refuse jurisdiction
in these circumstances as matter of international comity (i.e. the desire to avoid conflicting decisions of the courts of different
countries)? Clearly, there is little point in
spending time and costs pursuing an alternative action in such jurisdictions.
16
Managing Director
The Swedish Club Academy AB
which will then be integrated into the survey. The Swedish Club Academy ensures
that taking part in the survey will require
minimal effort from the shipping company,
as it is our belief that having an anonymous
survey conducted by a third party will
ensure far more honest answers from the
respondents than an internal survey can.
After the survey is completed, there will be
a data evaluation with recommendations of
the appropriate measures to be taken.
There have been two seminars already
conducted on the survey this year, the first
on 28 February in Manila, and the second
in Singapore on 6 March. Both seminars
were enthusiastically received by representatives of the attending shipping companies.
For more information about the Mariner Attitude
Survey, please contact the Academys Project
Coordinator Lorraine M. Hager on +46 31 638 492
or email lorraine.hager@tscacademy.com
Harren & Partner Ship Management GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany
NTTA Nautical Technical Training Academy BV, Groningen, Netherlands
SAMAJU Academy, storp, Sweden
Shanghai Costamare, Shanghai, China
13
An international Workshop
Leader training event in
Piraeus, Greece at the end of
October. Participants from
left to right: Zhang Hongnan
of Shanghai Costamare Ship
Management, Bernd Ulbricht of HPS
Hamburg, Theodora Stavropoulou
of C.M.M. Inc., Elias Andersson of
Chalmers University of Technology,
Martin Hernqvist of The Swedish
Club Academy and Konstantinos
Bourliaskos also from C.M.M. Inc.
Closely following the MRM WSL training in Manila the week before, a
trip to Singapore meant another MRM event for the Academy. Here, Martin
Hernqvist (far right), is accompanied by representatives from Wallenius Marine,
Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics, Wavelink, STET, Singapore Maritime Officers Union and AET
Shipmanagement.
14
Pte Ltd, Bourbon Offshore Asia Pte Ltd, BW Fleet Management, China Navigation
Pte Ltd, Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte Ltd, DDW-PaxOcean Shipyard
Pte Ltd, Epic Ship Management Pte Ltd, Executive Ship Management Pte Ltd,
Goodwood Ship Management Pte Ltd, Hong Lam Marine, IMC Industrial Group, JR
Orion Services Pte Ltd, Maritime Education and Training Services Pte Ltd, MOL Ship
Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd, MSI Ship Management Pte Ltd, Norgas Carriers
Pte Ltd, NYK Shipmanagement Pte Ltd, Sentek Marine & Trading Pte Ltd, Singapore
Maritime Officers' Union, STET Maritime and Wavelink, Toll Logistics (Asia) Pte Ltd,
Wallenius Marine Singapore, Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics, Wavelink Maritime
Institute, Western Shipping Pte Ltd, VLK Traders (S) Pte Ltd, World Tankers
Management Pte Ltd.
The Swedish Club Academy team was hosted by NSB Academy at their headquarters in Buxtehude, to give a Workshop Leader Seminar. NSB is now Germanys fifth training provider of the Maritime Resource Management course. Following the seminar, NSB
now have six qualified MRM Workshop Leaders.
The MRM WSL network in India has expanded with an additional 14 new
MRM WSL licensees who participated in the 2-day seminar at the Holiday Inn
Hotel, Mumbai International Airport. A refresher course on the second day
was attended by one of the licensed MRM Workshop Leaders based in India.
The participating companies were: Bibby Ship Management, Fleet Management Training
Institute, Kuwait Oil Tanker Company and SEASPAN Crew Management India Pvt Ltd.
15
German-flagged
vessels guarded
by private security
companies
The International Maritime
Bureau Piracy Reporting Centre
(IMBPRC) reported worldwide incidents
of more than 300 attacks or hijackings of
seagoing vessels as of December 2012
(www.icc-ccs.org). These figures show the
continuous threat to the shipping industry
by piracy and the need for shipping nations
to protect their shipping community. This
has been acknowledged by the German
government, and the German parliament
(Bundestag) resolved an Act on 13December 2012 to permit armed guards on
board German-flagged vessels that have
been licenced in a specific approval procedure. Whereas originally the new Act
would have become effective from 1 August 2013, this date will now be suspended
to January 2014. The delay has resulted
from difficulties in agreeing on the specific
requirements that the security companies
must fulfil. These requirements will be
published in a separate regulation prior to
the effective date of the Act.
Two aspects of the law
The new law contains two aspects, one
covering the conditions and procedures
which have to be followed in order to
permit armed guards on board Germanflagged vessels and the other one dealing
with an amendment to the German law
on weapons. The first aspect, the licensing procedure, required an amendment
of the German Trade, Commerce and Industry Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung
(GewO)). The Federal Authority for Eco-
16
Dr Jan-Erik Ptschke
Lawyer
Ahlers & Vogel, Hamburg
Application for a
licence
Since only very few
security companies of the 160 -180
companies worldwide are domiciled
in Germany, it is expected that nonGerman companies will apply for a
licence with the BAFA and that the
documentation required by the BAFA
will mostly be filed in using English.
The authorities will be prepared to deal
with this, however they may insist on
some of the documents being translated
into German.
Another interesting renewal is that,
provided the security company consents
to it, the BAFA will list its name on
its website. The intention is to create
transparency and support the shipping
industry with a list of licenced security
companies.
independently of the domicile of the security company. The WaffG is also applicable
to weapons and ammunition used for protecting seagoing German-flagged vessels
( 28 para 1 WaffG). It has also been ruled
that the permit required by the German
weapons law is linked to the validity of the
licence of the security company.
Furthermore, there is no longer a requirement to obtain a separate permit to
bring weapons or ammunition into the
territory of Germany, i.e. weapons and ammunition which will be used on board a
German-flagged vessel can be brought on
board that vessel without an additional
separate permit. The local law in the port
states where the weapons are brought on
board has, however, to be followed by the
security companies.
The authority for weapons in Hamburg
will be in charge of the permits for the use
and possession of weapons and ammunition on board. The kinds of weapons which
are not allowed to be used are weapons of
war. This means that, for example, machine guns, full and
semi-automatic guns or hand
grenades are excluded.
The piracy problem will not
be resolved by this
The amendments to the German
GewO and WaffG do not deal
with the question of what kind
of action is legal to defend an attacked ship. According to German
criminal law (StGB), the scope of
activities of armed guards on board
is limited to the general rules on self-defence and help in need. Armed guards do
not have more legal rights in defending attacks of pirates than any other crew member, although they have different means.
The attack on a vessel by pirates is a
self-defence situation, which would allow
armed guards to use their weapons but
they need to choose the mildest available
remedy to stop the attack, which will be a
decision made about the individual case.
Hence, the licence for armed guards is not
a licence to kill but one to effectively
protect the crew and shipowner against piracy and other attacks by qualified experts.
The piracy problem as such, however, will
not be resolved by this.
17
Somali piracy
Somali piracy has been the major threat to international shipping since 2007, but it can be traced back to 1994,
when the first hijacking for ransom took place. The hijacked
vessels and the ransoms paid have been an almost daily part
of shipping life and in even in the international media it has
played a significant role. At one point almost 1,000 seafarers
were held for ransom on the coast of Somalia.
2012 saw a dramatic reduction in Somali pirate activity
with attacks dropping from 214 in 2011 to 50 during 2012.
Of these 50 the vast majority (46) occurred during the first
part of 2012, while in the second half only four incidents
took place. By the end of 2012 Somali piracy was back to
2007s levels.
So what is the explanation for this drastic reduction?
Some people have suggested that it was due to the merchant
ships arming themselves with private armed guards. As we
will see below, it is not quite as simple and there are not one
or two single decisive factors, but actually a range of parameters that together have decided the levels of Somali piracy.
These can be formulated as follows:
Pirates:
1. Capabilities. Vessels and equipment as well as the
overall infrastructure of pirates.
2. Intentions. Tactics, strategy and business objective
of the pirates.
3. Opportunities. Chances for taking advantage of
merchant vessels vulnerabilities. Return on investment for Somali pirate investors and alternative investments and business options. Politico-economic
developments in Somalia that are shaping the situation on land and thereby the opportunities.
18
Merchant marine:
1. Capabilities. In this case elements such as hardening,
speed, vessel type, use of PMSCs
2. Intentions and opportunities, such as market rates,
charter, freight and fuel cost.
3. Trading routes defined from (2) and (1).
Navies:
1. Capabilities. Number of vessels and helicopters deployed. Sensor effectiveness.
2. Intentions. Types of operations, ranging from showing the flag to offensive onshore attacks.
3. Opportunities. Options for exploiting pirate vulnerabilities as well as political and military signalling.
Rules of engagement.
4. Political and financial realities and the limitations
they impose.
Environment:
1. Geography, ocean currents, weather.
2. Local patterns of maritime activity.
Pirates
The Somali pirates level of activity has declined since early
2011. This is mainly due to the increasing difficulty in hijacking ships they have encountered and less due to onshore
changes in their operating environment. The number of pirates intercepted, captured or lost at sea has increased.
The number of ships being hijacked has fallen, making
the venture less tempting for the rank-and-file, leaders and
financiers. There are, however, still active syndicates. These
groups have seen a fall in their success rates, capturing fewer
Photo: US Navy
Somali Basin
Gulf of Aden
Indian Ocean
Red Sea/BAM
continues on page 20
19
has been cutting costs. Faced with an historically long spell of depressed freight rates and increasing bunker rates, companies are
increasingly looking to improve operating margins. This is done
increasingly by slow steaming and by reducing deviation around
areas of known pirate activity, when an armed team is onboard.
Navies
The Gulf of Aden is well covered by Naval assets, whereas the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean are less covered. Naval operations directly against pirate assets in the area are arguably one of the most
influential factors in the decline of pirate attack occurrences. The
counter-piracy operations have taken pirate attack groups out of
the equation before they could even enter the attack areas. With
a force level of approximately 25-40 Naval vessels in the area at
any given time, only a handful of ships are actually available for
counter-piracy operations along the Somali coast. The rest are being
replenished, doing national or World Food Program escorts and
monitoring the IRTC. It appears that Naval forces have become
more effective in monitoring and cutting off active pirate attack
groups after their first attack. This entails shorter life spans of
PAGs and a reduction in total attacks carried out.
Budget cuts in European countries have already led to some Navies scaling back. It is likely that more will follow and since the
escorting and monitoring of the IRTC has priority, the counterpiracy operations against the Somali east coast will suffer.
Environment
Geography is a fixed parameter, but various areas provide different
natural boundaries or opportunities to the pirates and the level of
their impact on pirate operations will depend on pirate capabilities
20
Legal | Update
Ph o
to: iS
hot
o ck p
21
22
Furthermore, as many readers will already know, the costs payable to ones representatives (lawyers and the technical experts) is not ordered to be paid up 100% by
the losing party. The reason is explained in
section 63: the paying party is given benefit of the doubt as to whether those actual
costs are reasonable and proportionate.
The conduct of the successful party can
lead to a tribunal curtailing or, alternatively, enhancing the costs award. For example
wrongly pleading part of a case, leading
to wasted costs both sides; or denying any
costs for two failed claims out of, say, five
(known as issue based assessment).
Andrew Bates
th
The implications
Taking the familiar setting of two maritime arbitrations based on back-to-back
charters: an unsuccessful claimant head
owner will only have to pay the nominal
cost incurred by his head charterer in defending the claim since the head charterer
has simply passed submissions up and
down the line.
The true cost of defending the head
owners claim has been incurred by the
sub charterers, and they will be awarded
substantial costs against the innocent head
charterer. Yet the head charterer cannot
pass that cost liability on the head owner,
nor can he recover his costs of pursuing
the sub charterers even though, but for the
head owners actions, neither set of costs
would have been incurred.
The solution
The element of prejudice is obvious. So
what can be done? The answer is for the
e solutions
party in the middle to plead a separate
cause of action in damages against (using
the example above) the head owners for the
sub charterers costs plus his own costs of
pursing his claim. The general rule is that
damages will be recoverable if a claimant
establishes a breach of contract or duty
(The Sargasso) and such losses (costs) were
within the reasonable contemplation of the
parties. Terms in a fixture recap containing express warranties coupled with BTB
head charter with XYZ might satisfy the
reasonable contemplation test.
It is important to remember that the
ordinary rules on damages apply. Looking
at another litigation scenario: did party
As (the defendant head owner) breach (a)
cause party Bs (the middle party) costs
liability to party C (the claimant sub charterer)? (b) was the type of loss too remote?
and (c) has party B properly mitigated?
These three rules interact and overlap.
For example, the costs of an application by
party B for security for costs against party
C may be deemed to have not been caused
by party As breach; or that it is not the
type of loss which party A can reasonably
contemplate because party C is a substantial entity who should not have to pay security for costs in the first place. The loss is
too remote.
What, when and why?
Your lawyer should provide sound advice
on tactics because they need careful consideration. Instead of defending a claim
Conclusion
The above shows us that there are many
permutations of litigation and the cost
consequences which can result informs users of London arbitration to think ahead
carefully about those consequences as they
examine the underlying merits of the dispute. The rewards and savings are there but
achieving them owes everything to good
case management.
23
Environmental salvage
Over the past ten years, the International Salvage
Union (ISU) has pursued that salvors should be entitled to
greater remuneration to better reflect the efforts made by them
to minimise damage to the environment.
Discussions have been between the industry stakeholders
via the offices at Lloyds Salvage Group, but have not led to a
consensus to amend the current Lloyds Open Form (LOF)
24
Iran sanctions
On 2 January, President
Obama signed into law the
Iran Freedom and CounterProliferation Act (IFCPA) of
2012, which entails an expansion of the extra territorial reach of US-Iran sanctions
that now extend to the shipping industry. As an example,
entities in the Iranian shipping sector have been labelled
as entities of proliferation concern whose assets should be
blocked and it is prohibited to provide significant support and
services to these entities. IFCPA also provides a ban against insurance of any activities that violates any US sanctions on Iran.
In addition, the EU has issued Council Regulation 1263/2012
essentially prohibiting (1) the purchase and transport into the
EU of Iranian natural gas (2) the storage of Iranian petroleum
products (3) the proviso of a wide range of services to Iranian
vessels and vessels owned or operated by Iranian entities (4)
dealings with Iranian financial institutions.
Photo: iStockphoto
The Club insured the vessel, the Eider, a bulk carrier, for
P&I insurance. The Eider went aground at the port of Antofagasta in Chile on 31 October 2005 and spilled about 127 tons
of oil, including heavy fuel oil and diesel oil and caused pollution stretching for 7 miles along the coastline. A Pool claim
was made.
An extensive clean-up operation followed and took over
three weeks to complete. The Club paid clean-up costs of
around USD 5,000,000. Numerous groups of people associated with marine interests in the regionfiled claims against the
ship and the shipowner. The ship was arrested and the owner
and master ofthe ship were fined.
The Club set up a limitation fund pursuant to Chilean law
of USD 26,000,000 in local currency by way of a Club Letter
of Undertaking in the Court of Antofagasta against all the
claims and settled the fines on behalf of the owners to release
the vessel from the arrest.
The Eider sailed from Antofagasta after some temporary
underwater repairs were carried out. The total gross claims
amounted to USD 238 million.
After long, hard settlement negotiations and protracted
court proceedings for seven years through the Court of Antofagasta, the court of first instance, Court of Appeals and the
Supreme Court, the last claim for environmental damages was
finally dismissed by the Supreme Court of Chile, the highest
court in the country.
This case came to an end with the landmark ruling of
theSupreme Court. The Clubs local lawyer and correspondents worked hard and effectively, and achieved a satisfactory
outcome. The case cost the Club about USD 9,000,000.
Germany modernises
maritime law
DNV and GL to merge
On 20 December 2012, Det Norske Veritas (DNV) and
Germanischer Lloyd (GL) announced that they have signed an
agreement to merge. The new entity will be called DNV GL
Group. It will be one of the worlds leading classification societies and risk experts. The global headquarters for all business segments will be located in Hvik, Oslo. The maritime business unit
will be in Hamburg, Germany. The merger will require approval
from different competition authorities around the world before
the actual merger can take place.
25
ance in my blood; my father was responsible for P&I claims at the shipowner Brostrms in Gothenburg, he explains.
Hans joined The Swedish Club as an
Underwriter in 2010. In September 2011
he was appointed Deputy Area Manager
for Team Gothenburg and now it is time
to embrace Greece and Team Piraeus with
his energy and drive. At first he will work
alongside of Tord Nilsson to get into the
routines. (You can read more about Tord
on the next page.)
I am happy to see him staying with the
organisation in a new role as Senior Manager for Underwriting and Special Risks at
the head office in Gothenburg; that will be
a welcome support for me and the team to
further develop our business in Greece.
Developing relationships
Hans is a keen sailor and has been sailing
in the Mediterranean several
times. His preferences have been
in the south west
coast of Turkey
and the Greek
islands.
Greece is one of my favorite places, so
when I was asked to succeed Tord as General and Area Manager, there was only one
answer: YES in capital letters!
The family was easy to persuade and in
August his wife Christina, son Marcus
and daughter Elin will follow his example.
They are all planning to study in their new
home country.
I have never been living abroad before;
the closest I came was my three years at
sea with the Singapore-based Thome Ship
Management, so I am really looking forward to moving to Greece, doing what I like
the best: working in the shipping market.
The Swedish Club has always had a
strong commitment to Greece and Greek
shipowners.
My mission will be to further build our
business and to develop long-term relationships in the market, but also see to that the
team continues to deliver at the high level
which The Swedish Club is known for.
Irrespective of which company you
Back again
after 33 years
M/S BARDALAND
Arrival at Piraeus May 23, 1980
End of Sea passage: 12:10
Pilot on board
12:20
2 Tugs connected 13:00
First line
13:15
All fast
13:45
Departure
13:30 June 3, 1980
Bound for Thessaloniki
26
d in Piraeus
The peculiarity of saying yes
has taken Tord Nilsson to many
places and jobs over the years.
This time it has brought him
from Area Manager for Team Piraeus in Greece back to Gothenburg and the head office, but in a
quite new role as Senior Manager, Underwriting & Special Risks.
When Tord said yes to the post of
Assistant Underwriter at The Swedish
Club in -96 he didnt know it would
take him around the world. In one year
he was promoted to Underwriter and
in 2000 the yes in him took him to
the post as Managing Director of our
Hong Kong office, where he stayed for
five years. Back in Gothenburg and
Team Gteborg I, as Area Manager
and Senior Underwriter, he sat tight
for four
more years
until it
was time
for another yes,
when he
was offered a position in Greece.
Before moving to Greece, Tord had
only been there once on a four-day
business trip in 1998.
But I have always been curious
about new things and been looking for
new experiences, so it feels natural to
me to take on a challenge like a new job
in a new culture, says Tord.
I like
saying yes!
Cradle of shipping
He describes his years at the Piraeus office as an interesting, fun, fruitful and
rewarding experience.
The worlds biggest merchant
navy is managed and controlled from
Greece, and Piraeus is loaded with a
variety of shipping companies. There
is no place like this in the world this
is where it happens in our line of business!, Tord explains.
We have great members in Greece
and the team has created a good environment for delivering the expected
Carola Weidenholm
Corporate
Communications
27
Wherever I lay
my hat thats
my home
Martyn in brief
Name: Martyn Hughes
Age: 50
Hometown before Gothenburg:
London, UK
Family: two daughters; Zo 20 and
Sin 18 who live and study in the UK
Spare time: likes reading, cooking,
running and bike riding when he has
time off. He is also into music and listens to everything from Beethoven to
ABBA and even some Greek bouzouki
which he got from his years in Greece.
At one time he sang in the school
choir and even got to perform at the
Royal Albert Hall a couple of times.
Background: Martyn graduated from
Birmingham University (UK) in 1984
with a degree in Law. He qualified as a
Solicitor in England with Holman Fenwick & Willan, then spent 13 years with
the London P&I Club, including 5 and
half years in their Piraeus office, handling a mix of P&I and FD&D claims. In
2003-07 he joined the correspondent
Aus Ship in Sydney before returning to
the London Club for another six years.
He has worked continuously in Maritime Law since 1987.
Of current interest: our new FD&D
Manager in Team Gothenburg since 7
January.
28
Carola Weidenholm
Corporate
Communications
Tony Schrder
Area Manager
Team Gothenburg
29
18 19
Y
FEBRUA R
Y
FEBRUA R
5
2
4
2
3
2
2
2
21
Y
FEBRUA R
Y
FEBRUA R
Y
FEBRUA R
Y
FEBRUA R
30
mate in the world, mountains and seasides that are extraordinarily beautiful, food that is to die for and wonderful hospitality. Unfortunately the economic woes have severely impacted
the country and its people during my years here and I hope my
departure coincides with a turnaround for the Greek people
and their businesses.
Hans Filipsson will take over from me and will be starting
in early April. Hans has been an acquaintance of mine for the
past 20 years, after he married one of my former colleagues
best friends, and in the past six month I have got to know him
better. I think he will take over where I left off and that there
will be a seamless transition between the two of us. You will
not notice much of a difference as Hans is perfectly capable for
the role of General Manager of The Swedish Club in Greece.
Best of luck Hans!
The members of the Club in Greece include some of our longest standing members and they, together with the rest of the
membership, have always showed great support to us and I will
miss you all. The staff in the office are incredible and their commitment to the Club, to me, and its members is second to none.
Leaving Greece feels a bit like leaving my family but I am sure
that I will continue to be involved in the Greek business going
forward and that I will still be around and even come to see
you all from time to him. So thanks a lot for all your support
and see you soon!
Tord Nilsson
FEBRUA R
Photo: iStockphoto
RY
Ruizong Wang
31
32
Tore Forsmo
Area Manager
Team Norway
From left: Mr Nick Ghiouzelakis (Arion Enterprises Inc.) his daughter Valina
Ghiouzelakis and Dionysios Valaveris (Grecomar Shipping Agency Ltd.)
33
Staff News
Head office Gothenburg
Fredrik Bergqvist, Claims Executive P&I,
joined Team Gothenburg on 3 December
2012. He is a Master Mariner with seven years
seagoing experience and previously worked for
Damen Shiprepair Gtaverken in Gothenburg.
piraeus
Hans Filipsson has been appointed Area
Manager at Team Piraeus with effect from
1 April 2013.
34
Christian
Oldendorff,
REEDEREI NORD
and Godmother,
Cilla Rhodin.
CLUB
Qu i z
What
How
What
Anders Holmberg
In Memoriam
It is with great sadness that we have to inform you of the passing of our dear friend
and colleague Anders Holmberg.
As a fully qualified Master Mariner, Anders served on tank ships and RoRos before starting with the Club in 1987. He focused primarily on P&I claims throughout his career at the Club. In particular, he developed great skills and talents in the
field of environmental claims where his interest in nature and wildlife played an
important role.
Anders was known for his direct approach to matters where yes was yes and
no was no. This strong feeling of justice was often combined with his own particular sense of humour.
Anders was highly valued in his endeavours, not only by us but also by the whole
P&I community. He will be sadly missed by all of us who had the good fortune of
working with him.
Club calendAr
For further upcoming events, please refer to
www.swedishclub.com/Club Calendar
2013
36
www.swedishclub.com