Carl S. Bosco D.C.

Chiropractor - Naturopath
P.O. Box 1653
Coarsegold, Ca 93614

British Doctor Not In Good Shape
Discovers Natural
Health Principles

Saying NO To His
Doctor Saved His Health

My
doctor
wanted to
start me on
drugs. But I said, I want to see if theres
something better and alternative out there,
he says. I started exploring, and came across
intermittent fasting...

I stuck to that for about three months. During that period, I
lost about 20 pounds of fat. My body fat went down from 28
percent to 20 percent, and my blood glucose went back to
normal.
I ended up testing all sorts of different forms of fasting, including
alternate-day fasting. Eventually, I came up with something that I
called the 5:2 Diet, which is really counting calories two days a
week and eating normally the other five days.
That was two years ago and it stayed completely normal since... I
have to say its been absolutely life-changing.

Dr. Mosleys experience points out how easily one can reverse long-
time and serious health issues. What is most important is to realize
that its up to you and nobody else. Medicine is not where its at.

I havent read Dr. Mosleys book yet - The Fast Diet: Lose Weight,
Stay Healthy, and Live Longer with the Simple Secret of
Intermittent Fasting but Im very familiar with fasting and all its
ramifications. A true fast is with water only. I have supervised
many fasts this way. For the most part, fasting is one of the most
benign and potent healing strategies a person can use.

Dr. Mosley proves that even modified fasting is very powerful.
His plan involves eating normally for 5 days and then fasting for
2 days. The fast hes talking about allows an intake of around 600
calories! Thats a lot of food. Think about it. A zucchini is about 60
calories. A baked or boiled potato, anywhere from 68 to 129
calories. An apple, 116 calories. cup cooked butter beans, 90
calories. Cooked yam, 158. One extra-large egg, 83. A dozen
leaves of lettuce dont even worry about it.

So, you can eat all of the above mentioned 2 days a week, and still
lose weight and straighten out your metabolism. Wow! What a
bargain.

Dr. Mosleys plan is effective, but I would suggest a little
modification of his game plan that would make it work even better.
I dont know what eating normallymeans to him. Does he include
donuts, blueberry muffins, croissants . . . Id go easy on that stuff. A
little goes a long way.

My suggestion would be to eat as much raw food as possible during
those 5 days, and stay away from flour products breads, bagels,
muffins, cookies, cakes, crackers. Who would deny that eating
sugary pastries and sodas etc puts your efforts way back for sure!
Take a vacation from the fast food, the Freedom Fries (lighten up,
George Bush!) the burgers, hot dogs, sticky buns, churros and
such. Treat yourself to them only occasionally.

Try something crazy. Take a huge handful of sugar snap peas,
steam them til al dente, and dowse with a tsp of olive oil, toasted
sesame oil or butter, and a pinch of salt and pepper. Make this a
lunch or dinner. Do the same with zucchini, yellow squash, summer
squash, turnips, okra (my favorite) carrots etc.

Over time your taste buds will change and you will get over your
craving for sugary treats and excessively salty foods, like potato
chips. Trust me, it happens.

Soups

The nice thing about home-made soup is that you can make and
consume a gallon of the stuff in a day and it wont amount to more
than a few hundred calories. You can snack on it all day long and
its very satisfying. I often cut up a potato or sweet potato, onion,
stalk of celery, zucchini, carrot, parsley, Swiss Chard, half cup beans,
maybe a quarter cup of quinoa or rice etc. I add about a gallon of
water or more, flavor with tomato sauce or bouillon cube, or just
garlic, salt and pepper and herbs. With soups youre getting
necessary hydration and filling up on very few calories as well as
nutritious vegetables.
Im not opposed to meats or fowl or fish. I just suggest keeping it
down to a garnish, a flavoring, small amounts at a time.

Joe Cross, the Australian fellow that made the movie Fat, Sick And
Nearly Dead, straightened out his health picture by existing on raw
juices for 60 days. Thats effective too, but you dont have to get
that extreme. Look up Dr. Mosley. Another aspect of his regime is
high intensity intermittent interval training. This is also much
more effective than long strenuous workouts or marathon running.
I enjoyed Dr. Mosleys video interviews and his obvious sincerity.

Interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16FRcohh6Hw&index=5&list=
PLNJV9yr8AXU60oV-O_iQdoPxJWdDwlZlm

If you
struggle
with food
cravings,
especially
sugar,
know that
once you
make this
shift to
Metabolic Syndrome is a disorder of energy
utilization and storage, diagnosed by a co-occurrence
of three out of five of the following medical
conditions: abdominal (central) obesity, elevated
blood pressure, elevated fasting plasma glucose, high
serum triglycerides, and low high-density cholesterol
(HDL) levels. Metabolic syndrome increases the risk
of developing cardiovascular disease, particularly
heart failure, and diabetes Some studies have shown
the prevalence in the USA to be an estimated 34% of
the adult population, and the prevalence increases
with age.
burning fat instead of sugar as your bodys primary fuel, your
hunger for unhealthy foods will vanish, and you will not have to
exert enormous amounts of self-discipline to resist unhealthy foods
any longer. You will be back in control!
Dr. Mercola (Hes right on! - - Dr. B)

Reality Check. . .
911 And Beyond
It All Hinges On 9/11,
Doesnt It?

It's hard to believe that the
devastating collapse of the World
Trade Center is now 13 years behind us. I
remember watching the events unfold on
TV as if I were watching a Sci Fi movie,
and a low budget one at that. Smooth as
silk, within minutes TV anchor people
filled in the blanks for viewers. Before you
could think of a question to ask, an answer
was forthcoming - not from experts but
from the TV talking heads.
In short order the culprits were magically identified and their ring leader, Osama Bin
Laden, named as their mastermind. So quickly! I thought that rather fascinating,
considering the fact that even after 40 odd years, we still don't know exactly what Nixon
was up to in the White House! But I digress.
National Security advisor Condolezza Rice was asked to explain the rather
serious breach in security that took place at the Pentagon: I don't think
anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and
slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the
Pentagon. [No one predicted] that they would try to use an airplane as a
missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile,"
-- Rice, CBS News, 5/17/02
In fact, such a scenario had been studied extensively by the Pentagon.

My friends and I, watching the action on TV, were mystified that such a group of errant
planes could get past our powerful, ever-ready Air Force. Not one, but four airplanes!
If these planes had been loaded with nuclear warheads we would have been goners and
into a nuclear war. Something was wrong with this picture.
In October of 1999 a Learjet 35 was found to be off course and not responding to
communications. The plane had lost cabin pressure and everyone on board was
incapacitated due to lack of oxygen. An F16 Fighter jet was scrambled in short order to
intercept and investigate. The plane was accompanied to the hills of South Dakota where
it eventually ran out of fuel and crashed.

Over the past decade or so I have often found myself engaged in conversations on the
subject of the demolition of the WTC, and Im astounded at the lack of knowledge of
most people on important details of the event. I used to be just as ignorant until I turned
off the television. I turned off the TV and started reading analyses of the events by
actual investigative reporters, people who dont work for the censored news media.
When I turned off the TV I discovered the 1,500 or so architects, engineers, scientists,
demolition experts and commercial and military pilots who didnt believe the so-called
official scenario. When someone slips by the TV censors and tells a different story,
television anchors call for an almost religious faith in the official conspiracy theory,
no matter how damaging the evidence is to the contrary.
When I turned off the TV I started to learn that what we were told and shown conflicted
with the reality of that days events. I also learned some relevant facts about recent
history that begins to explain the unexplained. Bear with me (or not). Most people find
it difficult or impossible to suspend judgment in order to study new evidence.

US PLANNED FAKE TERROR ATTACKS ON
CITIZENS TO CREATE SUPPORT FOR CUBAN WAR

Does that headline look familiar? For anyone under the age of 60 or so, talk about the
1960s elicits a big yawn. Its ancient history and boring. Unfortunately, that ubiquitous
boredom has gotten the American people and the rest of the world into trouble that could
have been avoided. We have been asleep at the wheel for too long. This rampant
somnambulism is due in large part to the lack of a really free and independent press, one
where investigative reporters are valued for exposing malfeasance in high places. That
kind of press doesnt exist anymore. Of course, when you have a judiciary which
refuses to prosecute government and financial bandits, whats to stop them? You have to
seek out investigative reporting, and this requires reading books and articles. I know
college graduates who have not read a book since graduation day.
Were also in this fix because we play the voting charade every 4 years and really think
we have a choice. We watch helplessly as the wealth created by the American people is
stolen from it by the fraudulent bankster class (e.g. B of A recently indicted for trillions
of dollars in fraudulent home loans, that sank the economy)while we grovel for a
modicum of health care and skimp on food in order to get our teeth fixed.
Now, for some important (unreported) modern history.
From the book - BODY OF SECRETS by James Bamford, Doubleday, 2001,
According to secret and long-hidden documents obtained for Body of Secrets, the Joint Chiefs of
Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S.
government. In the name of antiCommunism, they proposed launching a secret and bloody war of
terrorism against their own country in order to trick the American public into supporting an ill-
conceived war they intended to launch against Cuba.

Here are some excerpts from the long document
(sample of the original at right)
Page 11
(5) Blow up ammunition inside the base;
start fires.
(6) Burn aircraft on airbase (sabatage).
(7) Lob morter shells from outside of base
into base. Some damage to installations.
(8) Capture assault teams approaching
from the sea of vicinity of Guantanamo City.
(9) Capture militia group which storms
the base.
(10) Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires --
napthalene.
(11) Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be
lieu of (10)).
b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water
and power supplies, destroying
artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.
c. Commence large scale United States military operations.
3. A "Remember the Maine" incident could be arranged in
several forms:
a. We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and
blame Cuba.
b. We could blow up a drone (unmannded)
vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could
arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of
Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of
Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The
presense of Cuban planes or ships merely
investigating the intent of the vessel could be
fairly compelling evidence that the ship was
taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or
Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast
or have seen the fire. The US could follow with an air/sea rescue operation covered by
US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existant crew. Casualty lists in
US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.
Page 13
7. Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as
harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba. Concurrently, genuine
defections of Cuban civil and military air and surface craft should be encouraged.
8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban
aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United
States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen
only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of
college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to
support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and
numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA
proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be
subsituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected
passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered
aircraft would be converted to a drone.

b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual
aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of
Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying
aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly
into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will
have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the
aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft
meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When
over Cuba the drone will begin transmitting on the inter-
national distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he
is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission
will be interrupted by the destruction of aircraft which will
be triggered by radio signal. This will allow IACO radio
stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what
has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to
"sell" the incident.

9. It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban
MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack.

President John Kennedy was approached with the plan. The Joint
Chiefs thought he would be a pushover for war, but he rejected it outright as being a
dangerous game that would lead to disaster. (He would also fail to back up the CIAs
unauthorized invasion of Cuba in the now famous Bay Of Pigs incident) In short, John
Kennedy was headed for assassination.
Deep Politics
To comprehend what is going on in the world we must first come to the realization that
there is an element in government, more correctly among the
military/industrial/intelligence establishment, a rogue network that is willing to do
whatever it takes to get what it wants. It has the resources. The CIA, for instance,
doesnt wait for the government to approve its nefarious plans. They dont wait for
funding to be approved by Congress. They get their money to name one - from the
sale of drugs in the inner cities and use the money to fund death squads in, for instance,
Central and South America. Remember the Iran-Contra story and hero Ollie North?
(read Dark Alliance by investigative reporter Gary Webb)

THE NEW YORK TIMES
* * * * *
Thursday October 28, 1993
"Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart
Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast"
By Ralph Blumenthal
Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists
were building a bomb that was eventually used to
blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned
to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting
harmless powder for the explosives, an informer
said after the blast.
The informer was to have helped the plotters build
the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan
was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other
ideas about how the informer, Emad Salem, should
be used, the informer said.
The account, which is given in the transcript of
hundreds of hours of tape recordings that Mr. Salem
secretly made of his talks with law-enforcement
agents, portrays the authorities as being in a far
better position than previously known to foil the
February 26th bombing of New York City's tallest
towers.
The explosion left six people dead, more than a
thousand people injured, and damages in excess of
half-a-billion dollars. Four men are now on trial in
Manhattan Federal Court [on charges of
involvement] in that attack.
Mr. Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian Army
officer, was used by the Government [of the United
States] to penetrate a circle of Muslim extremists
who are now charged in two bombing cases: the
World Trade Center attack, and a foiled plot to
destroy the United Nations, the Hudson River
tunnels, and other New York City landmarks. He is
the crucial witness in the second bombing case, but
his work for the Government was erratic, and for
months before the World Trade Center blast, he was
feuding with the F.B.I.
Supervisor `Messed It Up'
After the bombing, he resumed his undercover
work. In an undated transcript of a conversation
from that period, Mr. Salem recounts a talk he had
had earlier with an agent about an unnamed F.B.I.
supervisor who, he said, "came and messed it up."
"He requested to meet me in the hotel," Mr. Salem
says of the supervisor.
"He requested to make me to testify, and if he didn't
push for that, we'll be going building the bomb with
a phony powder, and grabbing the people who was
involved in it. But since you, we didn't do that."
The transcript quotes Mr. Salem as saying that he
wanted to complain to F.B.I. Headquarters in
Washington about the Bureau's failure to stop the
bombing, but was dissuaded by an agent identified
as John Anticev.
Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev had told him,
"He said, I don't think that the New York people
would like the things out of the New York Office to
go to Washington, D.C."
Another agent, identified as Nancy Floyd, does not
dispute Mr. Salem's account, but rather, appears to
agree with it, saying of the `New York people':
"Well, of course not, because they don't want to get
their butts chewed

The New York Times is often accused of being Liberal, when in fact it is as
reactionary as the rest. It does the bidding of the War Department and big-money
interests.
This confusingly jumbled article in the Times is typical of a limited hangout. A
limited hangout is CIA jargon for a little hint of true information, making you think you
know the whole story when you really know anything of importance. A first semester
journalism student would get an F if she wrote this bad. Its calculated to confuse and
obfuscate.
The simple fact of the matter as you will discover if you search elsewhere more deeply
is that Mr. Salem was a patsy used by the FBI for the purpose of blaming him for the
1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, when in fact it was the FBI that went ahead
and used live explosives in place of the fake powder Emad Salem had banked on.
However, the FBI was unable to pin it on Salem because he got suspicious and started
wearing a recording device at his meeting with them.
This is the reality we must face if we are going to set our minds and our country
free. While we wave the flag and get all dewey-eyed about our exceptionalism, dark
forces within the halls of government, and in the military/intelligence/corporate cabal
are vying for world domination (900 military bases around the world at present) and
itching for a war with Russia. They are willing to commit our sons and daughters to
their crazy war nightmares not their own kids, of course. Muslim terrorists are the
new boogeyman, the threat to the US and the world. And the various intelligence
agencies United States and British - are engaged in making sure that terrorism is on
the front page every day of the week.
With all this in mind, lets bring ourselves up to date.

Sep 11, 2001

Still An Unsolved Crime

One morning a few years ago, driving to
Oakhurst on my way to the office, I saw a
young man thumbing for a ride. I stopped
for him and he got in. Thank you sir.
Much appreciated, he said.

We drove along quietly for a few minutes as the boy looked dreamily out the window at
the passing landscape. Man, Im glad to be back home, he said finally. I asked where
he had been. He told me that he had just come back from Iraq. He had seen a lot of fire
fights. His face still retained the smooth innocence of a young child, yet he had already
been in a war zone.

Pretty dangerous, huh, I said, not knowing what else might be appropriate.
Its miserable over there, sir. Those poor people . . . But Ill tell you what, man, were
over there for all the wrong reasons. Just as simple as that. Its no good, no good at all.
Our eyes met, I nodded. I wondered if he saw me as one of the duped, one of the flag
wavers, someone who turned in his French fries for Freedom Fries? I hope not.

The boy was so young. I couldnt help thinking what an awful thing to do to a young
man like this. What a rotten thing to do to all these kids. They should be home learning
a trade, farming, learning music or going to college, engaged in positive activities that
enhance the community and the world. I suddenly felt heavy in the heart.

We were silent the next ten minutes. Staring out the windshield, his face was
expressionless. I dropped him off in town and we said goodbye.

On September 11, 2001 4 purported hijacked planes made it past our advanced
airforce. After I turned off TV coverage I learned that most of the so-called
pilots were basically incompetent at flying any airplane. Instructors had this to
say about Hani Hanjour, supposedly the most competent of all the alleged
hijacking pilots:
"weak student" who "was wasting our resources."
I didn't allow him to come back. I thought, 'You're never going to make
it.' Source (Newsday.com) And other sources.

He also was trained for a few months at a private school in Scottsdale,
Ariz., in 1996, but did not finish the course because instructors felt he was
not capable. Instructors regarded him as a poor student, even in the weeks
before the attacks.

TV News Coverage is like Fast Food: Its fast, tastes great, is
addicting, it comes from a centrally controlled source, and its devoid of
life-giving nutrients and eventually ruins your health.
"He had only the barest understanding what the instruments were there to
do. He got overwhelmed with the instruments. He used the simulator
perhaps three or four more times, Fults said, then "disappeared like a fog."
Washington Post, 10/15/2001

"He could not fly at all." - New York Times (5/04/02)

His flying skills were so bad...they didn't think he should keep his pilot's
license.

" I couldn't believe he had a commercial license of any kind with the skills
that he had." Peggy Chevrette, Arizona flight school manager." CBS News
(5/10/02)

Flying home recently from Pennsylvania after a visit with family there, I spent some
time looking out of the airplane window at the vast ocean of billowing clouds passing
below. The view is mesmerizing and you cant help but marvel at the vastness of the
sky. At one point the pilot informed us that we were still 800 miles from our destination,
San Jose, California. I pictured Hani Hanjour at the controls, the Twin Towers invisible
hundreds of miles ahead in that vast ocean of clouds, the ground absolutely obscured
from view.

It suddenly hit me. I spontaneously burst out: No way! No way! (The passenger next
to me looked alarmed). No way could anyone let alone a grossly incompetent
neophyte like Hanjour find his way to the needle in the haystack of the Twin Towers
without a huge amount of experience and a firm knowledge of instrumentation.

I was almost hyperventilating. This fraud is too obvious to overlook. One plane no.
Two planes out of the question. Three planes absurd.

The whole nuclear Fail Safe program is based on quick response by the Air Force,
whose aim it is to head off an attack, ostensibly by the Russians. Yet this time four
planes flying off course were not intercepted, even though flight controllers knew they
had been hijacked, and all 8 pilots and co-pilots failed to push a simple button that
would have alerted ground control to a MAY DAY emergency.


The Penta-con

At the Pentagon, reporter Jamie Mcintyre - who must have been told like the rest of us,
that a plane had crashed into the home base of our military establishment said that he
could see no evidence of a plane crashing anywhere near the Pentagon.
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ.
This report did not jibe with the official story that said a massive jetliner had crashed
there, and there was hardly any debris on the site to indicate such an event had
happened. When people asked what had happened to the two huge titanium steel
engines, they were assured by all-knowing news anchors - that they must have simply
vaporized, along with passengers, seats and all the rest of the
plane. . . . a first in aviation history. Who believes this stuff?
Day after day, videos of a plane disappearing into the Twin
Towers were shown on TV. The planes entered the buildings
flawlessly, without slowing down at all, as if traveling through
marshmallow instead of steel beams and concrete. I struggled
hard with this assault on my own knowledge of physics and chemistry. I resisted
internally to being asked to believe the impossible, but I didnt know how to articulate
my doubts.
Airplanes are basically aluminum tubes, relatively fragile for anything except to serve as
containers (of people and luggage) and as sleek surfaces during flight. As the planes
disappeared into the two towers, not a wing nor a tail broke off or bent or was perturbed
one iota in its entry, while all it takes is a 2 pound seagull to tear the nose of a jetliner to
shreds. I was reminded of the Road Runner cartoons, where
the hapless coyote flies into a building leaving a coyote-
shaped hole. Planes had hit brick or steel-reinforced concrete
walls before, but they simply turned to crushed and crumpled
rubble, they didnt make a cookie cutter impression in the
building.
Anomalies began to pile up over the weeks and months. I
began to feel uneasy about the whole official conspiracy
theory. The more I watched these videos the more
implausible they appeared. At the Pentagon, none of the
automatic, defensive rockets had been deployed. Why?
Dozens of cameras on surrounding hotels, and on the
Pentagon itself, were confiscated immediately, and what they
saw is still kept from the public. Why?
First responders at the Pentagon saw a hole in the building that was too small to
accommodate the body and wing span (125 feet 16 foot wide hole) of a Boeing 757.
Columns that should have been demolished, that were in the path of the alleged plane
were still standing.

Demolition Science
As you probably know already, to safely destroy a huge skyscraper in a big, crowded
city like New York, to bring it down to the ground, requires great skill, planning and a
good deal of time, often weeks or months of meticulous investigating. Charges must be
placed scientifically against supporting columns and exploded in the right sequence,
otherwise the building will likely fall to one side or the other, destroying other buildings
in the area. Demolition companies are charged with a great responsibility. Nothing
must be left to chance. But if all the parameters are met, if all the science is followed
meticulously, the results will be as expected: the building will collapse straight down
into its own footprint.

Well, on the day of September 11, 2001, a remarkable thing happened. Incompetent
pilots flying incredibly complicated airliners made monkeys out of the people in the
demolition industry. They were shown to be frauds, scammers, a useless profession.
What do I mean? I mean we learned that day that precision demolition can be
accomplished without all that preparation and planning. All you have to do is crash a
plane into a building and, in under an hour, the structure will fall straight down into its
footprint without a hitch. This happened twice that day, flawlessly. In fact, you don't
even need a plane to take down a building. A third structure known as building 7 also
came down neatly into its own footprint several hours later, all on its own.
Or did it?

And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
if all records told the same tale then the lie passed into
history and became truth. "Who controls the past," ran the
Party slogan, "controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.". . .George Orwells 1984



"Let us never tolerate outrageous
conspiracy theories" - - George Bush.
Dont think. Dont question. Let us tell you what is real and unreal, not what
you see with your eyes.
The public though bewildered accepted the impossible. They were admonished to
have faith in the official tale, and not listen to people with doubts. An enemy was
identified and the peoples built-up rage was
directed at
Middle
Eastern faces
flashed
across the
screen
hundreds of
times. The
soothing
balm of revenge was handed to us to inhale, and
soon we sat back and watched, without regret, the spectacular bombing and immolation
of cosmopolitan downtown Bagdad, Iraq. Hollywood style, the hellish event was given
a chic label: Shock and Awe. CEOs on Madison Avenue must have gloated over that
one.
If you get your news from television it's likely the collapse of Building 7 was never
brought to your attention. It's also likely you have only heard about the government's
conspiracy theory, the one that says 19 Muslim hijackers flew those planes into the Twin
Towers. The physical impossibility of three collapses occurring the way that they did is
never touched upon by the major media. To contemplate such a problem with the official
story creates discomfort and doubt in peoples minds. It's disturbing. That's why the
media has such an easy job of convincing us that the impossible is possible. We want to
believe it anyway.
But thousands of scientists, architects, engineers and commercial and military
pilots don't buy the official story. Their knowledge of physics is better than mine, yet it
took several years for these brave people to shuffle off the stupor and ask some hard
questions. (Architects And Engineers For 911 Truth)
So, the government's story is a conspiracy theory too. There's nothing outrageous or
fringy about having a theory. Lets explore the word conspiracy. Just picture this one in
its rawest form: Here are the conspirators literally those who breathe together (those
who co-spire or conspire) To huddle close together such that the individuals involved
are literally inhaling each others breath, all the while cooking up a plot to pull off . . .
the bombing of the WTC, for instance.
Yes, there was a conspiracy. There still remains the question of who were the
perpetrators behind the conspiracy. Many of those alleged Muslim hijackers accused by
the FBI of pulling off the attack, and that should have died in the plane crashes, are still
alive. See the following BBC article (British Broadcasting Co.) for a story.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm
Get information from the experts. Find this on YouTube: 9/11: Explosive Evidence -
Experts Speak Out (Free 1-hour version) from AE911Truth.org
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg

There is plenty of good
evidence to be found
among many investigative
journalists, people who
have no reason to kowtow
to the controlled press, and
who are not allowed on the
evening news. One of them
is a Canadian, an
investigative reporter
named Barry Zwicker. We
owe it to ourselves to at least listen to the other side of the story.
Go to: https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=7wNoLee0hAY
A Rogue Network

Do you recall the shoe bomber story of a few years ago? Did you know
that a well dressed man was seen ushering him onto the plane, even though
he didnt have a passport. This person told the ticket agent that we do this
all the time. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAWKf55IhIM

Intelligence agencies often recruit people who are mentally deficient and of low IQ,
misfits, loners etc and manipulate them for assignments. This incident is just one of
many that were obviously set up to inflame the publics fear and prejudice, to get the
public to support more incursions into the Middle East. September 11, 2001 was the day
a coup detat took place in the United States. It was the day the Rogue Network of
military and intelligence moles showed their hand. What we can do about this can only
begin after we turn off the evening TV news and become our own investigative
reporters. This network has evolved over many decades since the end of World War II.
There isnt space here to cover many important tangential aspects of the present subject.
If you are interested in more, write me. . . . . . . .Be well. . . . . .Dr. B


The Body Is Self-Healing If Given The
Proper Care. Try Chiropractic First

Our Mission: To Improve The Quality Of Life
Through Routine And Affordable Chiropractic
Care
Were At A New
Location In Oakhurst!
Give me a call at 559-760-4199 because Im
only there by appointment

How To Get There: Going North
on Hwy 41, turn left at Subway
Sandwich, then right away turn
right on Greenwood Way. Stay
to the right all the way into the parking lot. Suite Hin the
back. (Were next to the Bikers Church)