Rubric Made Using: RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org ) >> To save this document onto your computer, please choose File :: Save As
from your Browser Menu. <!-- function func_printPage() { if (window.print) { window.print(); } else { alert('Your web browser does not support the automatic print feature. You must go up to "File" and choose "Print"'); } } //--> Multimedia Project : Survivor (Biome Edition) Teacher Name: Mrs. Schaefer Student Name: ________________________________________ CATEGORY 4 (A work) 3 (B work) 2 (C work) 1 (D work) Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. All members of group have a role. Vocabulary is advanced. Members do not read information from the slides. Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. 3/4 of the members of the group have a role. Vocabulary is adequate. There is minimal reading from slides. Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of
the time. 1/2 of the members have a role in the presentation. Vocabulary is bland. Members depend on reading from the slides. Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost. The presentation does not stay on topic. Vocabulary is poor. Only one member has a role in presentation. Group is unprepared. Originality Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. The proposition captures the audience and is convincing. Deep thought regarding the characteristics of the biome is evident. Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. The biome is presented accurately, but 1/2 of the slides are facts and the
information obtained required minimal critical thinking. Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. The proposition of the biome is not as convincing and the presentation lacks creativity. Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit. Sources are not listed and the project lacks creativity and accuracy. The work is poorly researched and deep thought is not evident. Sources Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format. Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format. Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format. Very little or no source information was collected. Requirements All requirements are met and exceeded. The Presentation exceeds the requirement of 10-20 slides, the presentation is appropriate length, and the members never veered off topic. The class walked away from your presentation with new information regarding your biome. All requirements are met. Your group completed the 10-20 slide requirement, presentation is a few minutes shy of desired, but all areas of content were covered. Group met all requirements, but did not exceed them. One requirement was not completely met. Your group did not meet one of the
following: slide amount, oral presentation amount, or did not cover enough
characteristics of the biome. More than one requirement was not completely met regarding slide or oral presentation requirements. Group went off topic frequently and poorly relayed information about the chosen biome. Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Group covered biome climate, fauna, flora, all scientific names, and deep creative marketing for the Survivor project. Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to
be good. The group understands the chosen biome information and accurately
relays it, but does not provoke deep thought for the audience. At least one scientific name was not correct. Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. Biome proposition is not convincing. Information is researched, but not in depth. Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. Information is not
correct. The work displays poor understanding of the chosen biome. Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the
presentation. The pictures chosen to market the biome are high quality and
visually appealing. Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. Pictures chosen are appropriate to the biome, but may not be
the best quality. Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. A theme is not established and the presentation is not visually appealing. Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content. The pictures are blurry and not accurate. Date Created: October 20, 2014
Copyright 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC To view information about the Privacy Policies and the Terms of Use, please go to the following web address: http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=TermsOfUse <!-- window.focus(); //-->