PRA LOG February 2014

PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST LOG 2014
Page 2 Current as of 10/17/2014 Time: 9:24 AM

Request
No.
Request
Date
10-Day
Due Date
14-Day
Ext. Date
Status Completed
Date
Requested By Info Requested
Comments/Date Partial
Completed
2014-14 1/23/14 02/02/14 n/a Complete 1/23/2014 Larry Parsons,
Monterey
Herald
Copies of Mr. Austin's
forms 501, 700 & 410
Inspected file and given
copies on the spot.
2014-15 1/30/14 02/11/14 n/a Complete 2/3/2014 Candace Cate Historical Election
Information
May require extension
2014-16 1/31/14 02/10/14 n/a Complete 2/7/2014 William S.
Hood, J r.
Copy of Claims filed by
counsel on behalf of Mr.
McInchak & Mr. Hanson
Letter sent 2/7/2014
2014-17 1/31/14 02/10/14 n/a Complete 2/3/2014 Ms. Paterson All documents noted on the
agenda as "Under
Separate Cover"
Referred to website
where documents were
posted on 2/3/2014
2014-18 2/1/14 02/11/14 n/a Complete 2/4/2014 Mary Schley,
Pine Cone
Forms 460's for Candidates
for Office and Elected
Officials
2014-19 2/4/14 02/14/14 n/a Complete 3/14/2014 Candace Cate Elections Information See similar request
same person Request
No. 2014-15.
Voluminous request.
Pine Cone
Check Register Questions Media Inquiry
Pine Cone
Why you asked for
Wonderspace to be
removed from agenda and
if/when it will return
Media Inquiry
2014-22 2/11/14 02/21/14 n/a Complete 2/11/2014 David Schmalz,
Monterey
County Weekly
Inquiry about Wonderspace
Carmel
Media Inquiry
2014-23 2/11/14 02/21/14 n/a Complete 3/20/2014 Michael
W.Stamp
Follow-up to 2013 request.
Various claims
See original request
attached. Letter sent on
2/28/14. Ms. McNary was
advised as to the cost
and process for pick up.
Pine Cone
Is sign at 100 Dolores
permitted? And agenda
dates for planning
commission
Media Inquiry
2014-25 2/18/14 02/28/14 Extension
3/14/2014
Ok to
Provide
partials
Complete 4/29/2014 Anita Taff-Rice,
iCommom Law
Copies of Agreements or
other authorizations for
communications provider
access to public rights of
way
See original request.
Letter sent seeking
extension. Requestor
asked to receive
information partially as it
becomes available on
3/20/14. Sent Via email
on 4/29/2014 -
2014-26 2/19/14 03/01/14 n/a Complete 2/19/2014 Candace Cate See original request Candidate Inquiry
Pine Cone
Various Planning Topics Median Inquiry
2014-28 2/26/14 03/08/14 Extension
3/21/2014
Extension
3/31/2014
4/22/2014
5/21/2014
Complete 5/21/2014 Natalie Clark,
The Claims
Center
Information on Street
designated as 3rd &
J unipero and Torres
related to a claim
City continues in
communication with
requestor on this
request. Seeking further
extension to 3/31/2014.
Pine Cone
new PRA policy Media Inquiry
Pine Cone
Deanna Allen's job title, job
description and salary
Pine Cone
copy of appeal form
submitted by Mr. Shield
Media Inquiry

Request No. 2014-18

Information Requested: Forms 460's for Candidates for Office and Elected
Officials

Due Date:
(Office Use Only)
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Pub fie Records Request
City Clerk Department
File No.: 9-u) Lf-/ ?{
(Office Use Only)
THIS PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST FORM ITSELF CONSTITUES A PUBLIC RECORD AND IS SUBJECT TO PUBLIC
DISCLOSURE UPON REQUEST. Fill out info in box only
Date of Request: 2.
-
l-} v Requested By:
(V1 {!'-{ SC HLJ:y
Company: p\ \...) 15

Address:
Phone, Fax, Email:
Info Requested (be specific):
t't\S r-Y\
/2_ 1.-f. tlu--L
'
U'A.....
'
l i )!::J
Date Desired:
(City has 10 days to determine whether the request in whole or inpart is a disclosable public record pursuant to GCS 6253(C).
In certain circumstances, the 10 dat e determination may be extended to an addition 14-days so long as persons are advised.)
Persons/Departments to provide information: (Office Use Only) Done: V Date: "J/4 /J Y
Request Approved by City Attorney: ----- Disclosable Records: -----
Need for Extension Past 10 Days: ________ Due Date:---------
If yes, was written notification sent:------ Date:----------
Cost Associated with Request: ------- - Total: $ ________ _ _
Request completed by: -----------Date Completed:-------
Method of Delivery:---------
Attach receipt of request and Invoice if applicable
Daryl Betancur
crom:
nt:
10:
Mary Schley [mary@carmelpinecone.com]
Saturday, February 01 , 2014 7:33AM
Daryl Betancur
Subject: Campaign finance statements
Hi Daryl,
Please send me copies of the campaign finances statements that were due from candidates at
the close of business 1/31/14.
Thanks!
Mary
Mary Schley, reporter
The Carmel Pine Cone
(831) 274-8660
mary@carmelpinecone.com
1

Request No. 2014-19

Information Requested: Elections Information

February 3, 2014
City of Carmel By The Sea
Office of the City Adminstrator
City clerk
Dear Mr. Betancur,
As you have said, you are a public civil servant and by law
per the Voter Registration Code Book-Section, you are
required to provide us with the information requested.
Please let us help you help us to find the information, tell us
where you are looking to find it and we can research it there,
as it is in public domain.
Our previous research and conversations for information
with the Voter' s Registrar Office in Salinas, have resulted in
several unanswered calls and emails with Mark Silvia, and
Chuck Cassinelli, Elections Analysts, which is very
frustrating and unnecessary. Mr. Claudio Valenzuela, Acting
Registrar of Voters, Monterey County Elections in Salinas
has only provided the following information. He provided
us with the number of registered voters in Carmel between
the years of 2010 and 2014.
Mr. Valenzuela and the associates at the Monterey County
Bar Association stated that you are required as a civil
servant to give us this information
1. What was the total population of Carmel By The Sea for
each year from 2006-2014?
2. 2. What was the total population of registered voters in
Carmel for each year from 2006-2014?
3. what was the population of registered voters that
physically voted at the polling stations in Carmel from
2006-2014?
4. How many people in Carmel physically voted at each
polling station in each district from 2006-2014? What are
or what were the locations of each district from 2006-
2014?
5. What were the number of votes counted at each station
during the hours of operation from 2006-2014?
6. How many poll workers were at each station from
2006-2014? How many officials at each station? What were
the duties of each official? What were the duties of the
poll workers? Who were they? How were they contacted?
7. How many registered voters in Carmel voted in absentia
as in mail in ballot from 2006-2014?
8. Who are they, and where did they mail their ballots from
2006-2014? What are the requirements for voters/residents
in Carmel for voting by mail-in ballot?
9. Can a second home-owner who does not live in the
home year round, vote in a Carmel election? What are
the requirements for a second home-owner to vote in a
Carmel election? How long must they live in the
residence to be able to vote in the election?
10. Will valid voters in Carmel be allowed to vote
electronically in 2014? What is that process of voting
electronically? Where do they go to vote, to the City of
Carmel website? Where can they find this information?
11. How many polling stations will there be for the
election in Carmel in 2014? What are the addresses and
locations for all of these stations? What will the layout
or process be? Please describe in as much detail as
possible.
12. How many people will be able to vote at one time
in a polling station? Who will be counting/ validating
the votes at the polling station?
13. As previously requested/ we will need a copy of
the ballot format so we can help our voters prepare and
fill out the ballot for a write-in candidate correctly/
during several of our voter registration presentations in
the coming weeks.
14. We also need to know the physical addresses/
parcel and block numbers of the population in Carmel
that are not
1
cannot, have not or will not be registered
voters. Where are they?
15. Will people be allowed to vote electronically?
16. What is the petition process to repeal the mail-in
and electronic voting process? Do you have those
forms? How do you file a complaint with the Secretary
of State and District Attorneys Office?
Some of the following information could have been obtained
from Mark Wienie, Senior Planner, but he has refused to
respond to several requests for information and help. We
have personally gone in several times to the City Hall Office
to leave messages and his secretary's that we have spoken to
have said, "He' ll respond to your requests when he has time.
He is either busy, at a meeting or unavailable." It has now
been two weeks.
17. How many legally permitted wine bars are in
Carmel? What are the addresses, occupancy, and owner
names for each establishment?
18. How many wine bars are pending? What are the
addresses, occupancy and owner names for each
establishment?
19. How many bars are there total that serve alcohol
and wine? What is the occupancy rate on these? What
are the addresses, occupancy and owner names for
each establishment?
20. How many liquor stores are in Carmel? What are
the addresses, occupancy and owner names for each
establishment?
21. What and how many types of businesses are there
in Carmel retail and commercial? We need the owner's
names and addresses as well. How many serve wine
and or alcohol? How many are pending? What are the
addresses and owner names for each business?
22. How much revenue does the city actually receive
from the
winebarsjbars/ restaurant/ retail/ commercial/liquor
stores that also serve and sell alcohol? What are the
addresses, and owner names for each business?
23. How many hotels and rooms are there? What are
the costs seasonally per room? How much does the city
receive for each hotel and each room? We need the
occupancy rate and tax for each room for each hotel by
name. (They are all different)
24. How many hotels serve or provide wine and or
alcohol in the rooms?
25. How many retail stores are there with wine bars in
them? How many are pending? What are the addresses
and owner names?
26. How much revenue does the city of Carmel By
The Sea receive each year from the wine bars?
27. What are the current city
maintenance/ construction projects and cost of such in
Carmel? Where are these projects? What is the total
number of people's names and positions and number of
new hires in all of city of Carmel Government? Time on
the job, recent fires/leaves/ terminations. How many
people are working these jobs? Where are they from?
The Elections Code book does not specify requirements in
the municipality of Carmel and we want to make sure we
have as much of the correct information as possible in our
research. As City Clerk, the municipality of Carmel By The
Sea is the only one who knows the information and we need
it to complete our research and agenda asap!
This process is extremely time consuming and frustrating. It
is imperative that we have the correct information for the
write-in candidate so we can run a successful campaign for
Mayor of Carmel. "The time is of the essence" and time is
our only true resource that we share, if we waste our time
we waste our life and therefore it makes us losers, and we
are not losers, we're winners and in fact, we may have
already won!!
Please help us to make the adjustments to the injustice that
has corrupted our system (or so it seems) and help restore
the faith in our democracy.
We look forward to your response asap.
Thank you,
Candace Cate
-l<ob - .
v{ u l \ aV) .0 .4tYLcl erv h_fp
r-:>
How many legally permitted wine bars are in
Carmel? What are the addresses, occupancy, and owner
names for each establishment? p (2 11 '2iJ Jl - 17
@ How many wine bars are pending? What are the
addresses, occupancy and owner names for each
establishment?
How many bars are there total that serve alcohol
q,_d wine? What is the occupancy rate on these? What
are the addresses, occupancy and owner names for
each establishment?
Q How many liquor stores are in Carmel? What are
q_e addresses, occupancy and owner names for each
establishment?
r:;;-) What and how many types of businesses are there
Carmel retail and commercial? We need the owner's
names and addresses as well. How many serve wine
and or alcohol? How many are pending? What are the
addresses and owner names for each business?
How much revenue does the city actually receive
Cifomthe
wine bars /bars I restaurant I retail I commercial I liquor
stores that also serve and sell alcohol? What are the
addresses, and owner names for each business?
r;;-) How many hotels and rooms are there? What are
costs seasonally per room? How much does the city
receive for each hotel and each room? We need the
occupancy rate and tax for each room for each hotel by
name. (They are all different)
RECEIVED
FEB 1 12014
cjity of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Planning & Building Dept.
83/ ?GOI - 0041
@V How many hotels serve or provide wine and or
alcohol in the rooms?
~ How many retail stores are there with wine bars in
Qhem? How many are pending? What are the addresses
and owner names?
2 ~ How much revenue does the city of Carmel By
qhe Sea receive each year from the wine bars?
@ What are the =rent city
maintenance I construction projects and cost of such in
Carmel? Where are these projects? What is the total
number of people's names and positions and number of
new hires in all of city of Carmel Government? Time on
the job, recent fires/leaves/ terminations. How many
people are working these jobs? Where are they from?
The Elections Code book does not specify requirements in
the municipality of Carmel and we want to make sure we
have as much of the correct information as possible in our
research. As City Clerk, the municipality of Carmel By The
Sea is the only one who knows the information and we need
it to complete our research and agenda asap!
This process is extremely time consuming and frustrating. It
is imperative that we have the correct information for the
write-in candidate so we can run a successful campaign for
Mayor of Carmel. ...,The time is of the essence" and time is
our only true resource that we share, if we waste our time
we waste our life and therefore it makes us losers, and we
are not losers, we're winners and in fact, we may have
already won!!
RECEIVED
FEB 11 2014
Planning & Building Dept.
March 10, 2014
POST OFFICE BOX CC CARMEL-
BY-THE-SEA, CA 93921 (831)
620-2000
VIA EMAIL ONLY TO: CANDACE CATE
Vincenzo D' Amico
Candace Cate
Candacercate2004@vahoo.com
Re: Voter Registration Questions (No. 2014-19)
Dear Mr. D'Amico and Ms. Cate:
This letter follows the City of Cannel-by-the-Sea's ("City") letter ofFebruary 28,
2014 responding to your three letters seeking voting and business related statistics
("Information Requests"). As previously stated, the City does not collect and record the
type of data that is required to answer your questions and must reserve its limited resources
to obligations to which it is legally bound. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City staff had an
opportunity to briefly look into your questions and created the attached documents that
contain related information that may be helpful to your search. Please note, the paragraph
numbers of the attached document correspond to the questions in your letter of February 3,
2014.
If you have questions regarding the foregoing, please contact me at 831-620-2000.
Very truly yours,
Jason Stilwell
City Administrator
DOCSOC/1658723vl/102910-0002
PRA 2014-19
1. Re: total population of Carmel by the Sea- This information can be easily obtained from theCA
Department of Finance. Although, the current city population is roughly 3,750 residents. The
City does not keep these type of statistics/metrics
2. Total population of registered voters in Carmel from 2006-2014. - The city does not keep these
statistics primarily because some elections have been consolidated (meaning run by the county
as a contractor to the city, and some elections are run exclusively by the city itself). What we
can say is that: (there are two sheets that appear to be responsive)
2010 election 2012 election
Total registration 2,800 2J40
Total Ballots Cast 1,652 1,579
%Turnout 59% 57.61%
Ballots at polls 462 429
Ballots by mail 1,190 1,150
3. Population of registered voters that physically voted at the polls? 2010=462, 2012=429
4. Carmel does not have Districts, therefore, question is not valid. Carmel typically has ONLY ONE
POLLING PLACE WITH TWO PRECINCTS IN IT
5. #of votes counted at each station- total votes counted for the day: 2010=1,652; 2012=1,579
6. How many poll workers at each station?= 3 and 1 inspector; how many otficials=n/a
7. How many voters in carmel voted absentee? Refer to above stats
8. n/a
9. second home owners can only vote in the place {domicile) where they are registered to vote.
10. Carmel does not have electronic voting other than at the polls; they can go vote at Carpenter
Hall (polling place) which will have two precincts table red and table blue
11. There are two precincts and one polling place set up at the sunset center, carpenter hall at san
carlos and 5
1
h.
12. How many people will be able to vote at one time in a polling place-it depends ,the number of
voting machines has not yet been determined
13. Ballot format has been provided
14. We do not have such information.
15. People will be allowed to vote by way of the optomark voting machine, which is certified by the
Secretary of State for voting.
16. Question is ambiguous
IUHSRUW#RI#YRWHU#WXUQRXW#IRU#5345#HOHFWLRQV
I

rovJded

-Chinn

-Korean
log
%Vote b)
fv.vJetnmes.e
Total
G=General
U=Urban
Registra- Ballots % Ballots at %Ballots Ballots Mall
FForsl

Law
Date City tion Cast Turnout Polls at Polls by Mall Ballots h-Gombodlon C=Charter R=Rural
2012
3/6/2012 La Verne 19496 2518 12.92% 711 28.24% 1807 71.76% ES G R
4/10/2012
Arcadia 28126 6923 24.61 % All Mall Ballot 6923 100.00% ESCV c u
4/10/2012 Avalon 1621 757 46.70% 447 59.05% 355 46.90% ES G R
4/10/2012 Bradbury 619 194 31 .34% 80 41 .24% 114 58.76% E G R
4/10/2012 Carmel by the Sea 2741 1579 57.61 % 429 27.17% 1150 72.83% ES G R
4/10/2012 Culver City 24783 4889 19.73% 2190 44.79% 2699 55.21% ES c u
4/10/2012 El Segundo 10439 3433 32.89% 1557 45.35% 1876 54.65% E G u
4/10/2012 La Puente 14650 1726 11.78% 933 54.06% 793 45.94% ES G u
4/10/2012 Lancaster 62380 9104 14.59% 2554 28.05% 6550 71.95% ES G R
4/10/2012 Lawndale CANCELLED #VALUE! #DIV/0! o.oo4 ESV G u
4/10/2012 Long Beach/April 69558 9970 14.33% 3807 38.18% 6163 61.82% ESTVKh c u
4/10/2012 Malibu 8686 2398 27.61% 1063 44.33% 1616 67.39% E G R
4/ 10/2012 Santa Clarita
-
15390 16.98% 3783 24.58% 11607 __

ES G u
4/10/2012 Sierra Madre 7768 2956 38.05% 1613 54.57% 1343 45.43%
--E- -
G R
4/ 10/2012 Vernon
69 45 65.22% All Mail Ballot 45 100.00% ES
c u
4/10/2012 Walnut 17203 4312 25.07% 1195 27.71% 3117 72.29% ESCKT G u
4/10/2012 Whittier 43558 7391 16.97% 3209 43.42% 4182 56.58% ESC c u
6/5/2012 Long Beach/June 23216 4905 21 .13% 2534 51.66% 2371 48.34% ESTVKh c u
J
Total Cities w/
17
elections
No. of cities with over 50% Mail Ballot turnout 13
with 40% to 50% Mail Ballot turnout 4
---- -- - --- - - -
I I
17
I
I I
No of cities with less than 40% Mail Ballot turnout 0
I I l
Total Elections responding in survey 17
I I I
Percent of electi ons voting greater than 40% by mail ballo 100.00%
n/elections/2003/report of voter turnout
UHSRUW#RI#YRWHU#WXUQRXW#IRU#5343#HOHFWLRQV
!L-nguages
provided

is-spnish
C.Chinue
.Japnest
Kwkorean
-Tagafog
Vietnamese
Total %Vote by
G=General
U=Urban
Registra- Ballots % Ballots at %Ballots Ballots Mail
fF"'I
Law

Date City tion Cast Turnout Polls at Polls by Mail Ballots C,.Charter R=Rural
2010
2/23/2010 Montebello-recall 27327 4270 15.63% 2066 48.38% 2204 51 .62% ES G u
4/13/10 Arcadia 28840 7964 27.61% 3304 41 .49% 4660 58.51% ESCV c u
4/13/10 Avalon 1609 876 54.44% 588 67.12% 288 32.88% ES G R
4/13/10

ED E G R
4/13/10 Culver City_ 24121 5057 20.97% 2504 49.52% 2553 50.48% ES c u
4/13/10 El Segundo 10708 2300 21.48% 1079 46.91% 1221 53.09% E G u
4/13/10 Lancaster 62044 13187 21 .25% 6152 46.65% 7035 53.35% ES G R
4/13/10 Lawndale 11576 1120 9.68% 498 44.46% 604 53.93% ESV G u
4/13/10 Long Beach/April 238294 40317 16.92% 15743 39.05% 22303 55.32% ESTVKh c u
4/13110 Malibu 8752 3297 37.67% 1747 52.99% 1550 47.01% E G R
4/13/10 Santa Clarita 89060 14946 16.78% 4895 32.75% 10051 67.25% ES G u
4/13/10 Sierra Madre 7793 2875 36.89% 1908 66.37% 967 33.63% E G R
4/13/10 . GAUU: ED ES c u
4/13/10 Walnut 17081 5051 29.57% 1591 31 .50% 3460 68.50% ESCKT G u
4/13/10 Whittier 43181 7380 17.09% 3498 47.40% 3882 52.60% ESC c u
4/13/10 Pico Rivera 29639 3684 12.43% 2026 54.99% 1658 45.01% ES G u
4/13/10 Carmel by the Sea 2800 1652 59.00% 462 27.97% 1190 72.03% ES G R
6/8/2010 Long Beach/June 25281 7239 28.63% 4299 59.39% 2940 40.61% ESTVKh c u
8/31/2010 Inglewood Runoff 48200 4289 8.90% 1825 42.55% 2464 57.45% ES c u
Total Cities wl
17
elections 2010 Average 52.55%
No. of cities with 40% to 50% Mail Ballot turnout 3
I I
15
I I
I I
I I I
Percent of elections voting greater than 40% by mail ballot 88.24%
March 10, 2014
City of Carmelby-the-Sea
BY-THE-SEA, CA 93921 (831)
620 2000
VIA EMAIL ONLY TO: CANDACE CATE
Vincenzo D'Amico
Candace Cate
Candacercate2004@.yahoo .com
Re: Voter Registration Questions (No. 2014-19)
Dear Mr. D' Amico and Ms. Cate:
This letter follows the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea's ("City") letter of February 28,
2014 responding to your three letters seeking voting and business related statistics
("Information Requests"). As previously stated, the City does not collect and record the
type of data that is required to answer your questions and must reserve its limited resources
to obligations to which it is legally bound. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City staff had an
opportunity to briefly look into your questions and created the attached documents that
contain related information that may be helpful to your search. Please note, the paragraph
numbers ofthe attached document correspond to the questions in your letter of February 3,
2014.
If you have questions regarding the foregoing, please contact me at 831-620-2000.
Very truly yours,
Jason Stilwell
City Administrator
DOCSOC/1658723vl/102910-0002
PRA 2014-19
1. Re : total population of Carmel by the Sea- This information can be easily obtained from theCA
Department of Finance. Although, the current city population is roughly 3, 750 residents. The
City does not keep these type of statistics/metrics
2. Total population of registered voters in Carmel from 2006-2014.- The city does not keep these
statistics primarily because some elections have been consolidated {meaning run by the county
as a contractor to the city, and some elections are run exclusively by the city itself). What we
can say is that: (there are two sheets that appear to be responsive)
2010 election 2012 election
Total registration 2,800 2,740
Total Ba llots Cast 1,652 1,579
%Turnout 59% 57.61%
Ballots at polls 462 429
Ballots by mail 1,190 1,150
3. Population of registered voters that physically voted at the polls? 2010=462, 2012=429
4. Carmel does not have Districts, therefore, question is not valid. Carmel typically has ONLY ONE
POLLING PLACE WITH TWO PRECINCTS IN IT
5. #of votes counted at each station- total votes counted for the day: 2010=1,652; 2012=1,579
6. How many poll workers at each station?= 3 and 1 inspector; how many officials=n/a
7. How many voters in carmel voted absentee? Refer to above stats
8. n/a
9. second home owners can only vote in the place (domicile) where they are registered to vote.
10. Carmel does not have electronic voting other than at the polls; they can go vote at Carpenter
Hall {polling place) which will have two precincts table red and table blue
11. There are two precincts and one polling place set up at the sunset center, carpenter hall at san
carlos and sth.
12. How many people will be able to vote at one time in a polling place- it depends ,the number of
voting machines has not yet been determined
13. Ballot format has been provided
14. We do not have such information.
15. People will be allowed to vote by way of the optomark voting machine, which is certified by the
Secretary of State for voting.
16. Question is ambiguous
UHSRUW#RI#YRWHU#WXUQRXW#IRU#5345#HOHFWLRQV I I I ! I
-- - --- , - --- - -, --- lj -, - --.- ,1 - i- -l,l -- -- -- ,, - -
I l I C.(:hl ne.. I
r r' . ,: I' r' ,; I '
I
V-VIttnamese
I Total I %Vote G=General ' u-urban
I Registra- Ballots % Ballots at % Ballots 1 Ballots Mail
I Law j
__ _ I . I P_olls I Mall Ballots . .
2012 T : . I t : _j
- 3t6!2-o12rLa verne _ _ _ _ L _19496 _ 25_1rl-m2% _ 28.24% _J._ 1807 71.76%
3 4.61-% t-c - -j_ --
4t10t2o!f _ 1 __ ?7 _I 46.70% I 447
1
59.05%HS.E_ 46.90% _ E_S t _ R-::=-
4/ 10/2012 1 619 1 194 I 31 .34% I 80 I 41.24% 114 58.76% E G L R

429 l 2?. r f% _ 1!Q_. - Es-:=- G __ I _R __ _

. 4889 . __ 2190 _!_S_ .. j _ o--u_
4/10/2012
1
EI Segundo I 10439 3433 1 32.89% ' 1557 j ' 45.35% 1876 54.65% f- E ___g._ =r-=u -
4i16t2012 fl.a Puente --- - - 14650 . 1726 i 11-78% I 933 . 5 4.06% 45:94% --rs-- - ; - -u-
_4/10/2012 I 9104 I 14:59%.
1
G -
1
R _
4/10/2012 llawndale ICANCELLED L #DIVIQI._.L '---:= 0.00%,_ U
3!1012012 j _ 38QL -! 38.18% 6161 ES'!Y.K!U__ j__ U -=.
1616 6?.39o/c:_ _........ .. I .-;... R:---i
4t10/2012 j.Santa Clanta ; 90634 153901 16.98% i 3783 1 11607 75.42% ES lG --r U
_ __ L_C??ll_ .. j 1613 I 54.??.% j 45.43% _ _ E_ . G ... _J_
4/10/2012 jVernon j 69 _j_ 45--, 65.22% All Mail Ballot 1 45 100.00% ES . C j U
17203 I 4312- -=.=;195-l '27 71% 3117 72.29% ESCKT- TG -- U
____ -_- - "i __ -7391 - 43 42% l _41 _ -- _ u-
6t572o12-.-- j 1Lcx1g-Beach/June - f - -2321"6- J' 49os--+-2r13% -
1
2534-h1.66% j 2371 - 4BJ4"/." ESTvKh1i. - c ! -u --
: - - r- - -, -- 1- : 1----l ---- - .-- T--
---- -r- ---r - . -- . ----- -+-- -- - - - - .... -
- - I ----- I ; - -- j I f- ---- t--
1-----
1
Daryl Betancur
From:
'ent:
fo:
Subject:
Hello Daryl,
candace cate [candacercate2004@yahoo.com]
Saturday, March 15, 2014 8:51AM
Daryl Betancur
Jason Stillwell letter
I have sent Jason Stillwell a reply to his letter dated March 10, 2014 in which he states that
information we have requested can be found in the attached documents. All that was there
was a letter stating such, could you please have him res end the attachments? Of if you have
them could you send them over? Thank you.
Candace Cate
1
IUHSRUW#RI#YRWHU#WXUQRXW# IRU#5343#HOHFWLRQV
'
Llngugn
rovfdod
-English
S-Spanish
.Chlnut

-Tgatog
Total %Vote

U=Urban
G=General
-Frsl
R.ftusslan
Law
Date City tion Cast Turnout Polls at Polls by Mail Ballots Kh..C.mbodian C"Charter R=Rural
2010
2/23/2010 Montebello-recall 27327 4270 15.63% 2066 48.38% 2204 51 .62% ES G u
4/13/10 Arcadia 28840 7964 27.61% 3304 41.49% 4660 58.51% ESCV c u
4/13/10 Avalon 1609 876 54.44% 588 67.12% 288 32.88% ES G R
4/13/10 era(:lbury eo E G R
4/13/10 Culver City 24121 5057 20.97% 2504 49.52% 2553 50.48% ES c u
-
4/13/10 El SeQundo 10708 2300 21 .48% 1079 46.91% 1221 53.09% E G u
4/13/10 Lancaster 62044 13187 21 .25% 6152 46.65% 7035 53.35% ES G R
4/13/10 Lawndale 11576 1120 9.68% 498 44.46% 604 53.93% ESV G u
4/13/10 Long 238294 40317 16.92% 15743 39.05% 22303 55.32% ESlVKh c u
4113/10 Malibu 8752 3297 37.67% 1747 52.99% 1550 47.01% E G R
4/13/10 Santa Clarita 89060 14946 16.78% 4895 32.75% 10051 67.25% ES G u
4/13/10 Sierra Madre 7793 2875 36.89% 1908 66.37% 967 33.63% E G R
4/13/10 C.A.atEU ED ES c u
4/13/10 Walnut 17081 5051 29.57% 1591 31.50% 3460 68.50% ESCKT G u
4/13/10 Whittier 43181 7380 17.09% 3498 47.40% 3882 52.60% ESC c u
4/13/10 Pico Rivera 29639 3684 12.43% 2026 54.99% 1658 45.01% ES G u
4/13/10 Carmel by the Sea 2800 1652 59.00% 462 27.97% 1190 72.03% ES G R
6/8/2010 LonQ Beach/June 25281 7239 28.63% 4299 59.39% 2940 40.61 % ESlVKh c u
8/31/2010 Inglewood Runoff 48200 4289 8.90% 1825 42.55% 2464 57.45% ES c u
Total Cities w/
17
elections 2010 Average 52.55%
I I I
15
I I I
No of cities with less than 40% Mail Ballot tumout 2
I I I
I I I
Percent of elections voting greater than 40% by mail ballot 88.24%
IUHSRUW#RI#YRWHU#WXUQRXW#IRU#5345#HOHFWLRQV

languag ..
rovlded
-English
.Spanflh
..Chinese
..

-Ta.galog
v ..vietn.lmen
Total %Vote U=Urban A-Armenian
G=General

R-Russfen
Law
Date City tion Cast Turnout Polls at Polls by Mail Ballots C=Charter R=Rural
2012
3/6/2012 La Verne 19496 2518 12.92% 711 28.24% 1807 71.76% ES G R
4/10/2012
Arcadia
28126 6923 24.61% All Mail Ballot 6923 100.00% ESCV c u
4/10/2012 Avalon 1621 757 46.70% 447 59.05% 355 46.90% ES G R
4/10/2012 Bradbury 619 194 31 .34% 80 41 .24% 114 58.76% E G R
- -
4/1 0/2012 Carmel by the Sea 2741 1579 57.61% 429 27.17% 1150 72.83% ES G R
4/10/2012 Culver City 24783 4889 19.73% 2190 44.79% 2699 55.21% ES c u
4/10/2012 EISegundo 10439 3433 32.89% 1557 45.35% 1876 54.65% E G u
4/10/2012 La Puente 14650 1726 11 .78% 933 54.06% 793 45.94% ES G u
4/10/2012 Lancaster 62380 9104 14.59% 2554 28.05% 6550 71.95% ES G R
4/10/2012 Lawndale CANCELLED #VALUE! #DIV/0! 0.00% ESV G u
4/10/2012 Long Beach/April 69558 9970 14.33% 3807 38.18% 6163 61.82% ESlVKh c u
4/10/2012 Malibu 8686 2398 27.61% 1063 44.33% 1616 67.39% E G R
4/10/2012 Santa Clarita 90634 15390
.. 3783 -
24.58% 11607

__ G u
--- -
54.57%
G--
--
4110/2012 Sierra Madre 7768 2956 38.05% 1613 1343 45.43% E R
4/10/2012
Vernon
69 45 65.22% All Mail Ballot 45 100.00% ES c u
4110/2012 Walnut 17203 4312 25.07% 1195 27.71% 3117 72.29% ESCKT G u
4/10/2012 Whittier 43558 7391 16.97% 3209 43.42% 4182 56.58% ESC c u
6/5/2012 Long Beach/June 23216 4905 21.13% 2534 51.66% 2371 48.34% ESlVKh c u
Total wl
17
elections
-
---- ---
I I
- -- - -
17
I L
I I I
I I I
Percent of elections voting greater than 40% by mail balio 100.00%

Request No. 2014-20

Information Requested: Check Register Questions

Public Records Request
Due Date:2.l 5) I Y
(Office Use Only)
1 1
Fife No.: V- :JD
(Office Use Only)
THIS PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST FORM ITSElF CONSTITUES A PUBLIC RECORD AND IS SUBJECT TO PUBLIC
Date of Request:
s- l

llf Requested By: MA rtt S[H Lf;i
Company: p'J IN I2.._ L..Q\.J-52
Address:
Phone, Fax, Email:
Info Requested (be specific): c k-P ( i::;_ i5 ;4"M s
L22f?C!4
'i/7
-
I '

Date Desired:
In certain circumstances, the 10 date determination may be extended to an addition 14-days so long as persons are advised.)
Persons/Departments to provide information: (Office use Only) Done: V Date: ?-/s/J!j
Request Approved by City Attorney: ---- Oisc::losable Records: -----
Need for Extension Past 10 Days: _______ Due Date:--------
If yes, was written notification sent: ------Date: ----------
Cost Associated with Request: --------Total:$ ________ _
Request completed by:----------Date Completed: _____ _
Attach receipt of original request and Invoice if applicable
Daryl Betancur
r:rom:
mt:
(o:
Subject:
Jason Stilwell
Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:14PM
Daryl Betancur
FW: check register questions
Daryl: please add to the log as a media inquiry. Thanks, Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Schley [mailto:mary@carmelpinecone.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:04 PM
To: Jason Stilwell
Subject: check register questions
Hi Jason,
Could you or someone please elaborate on the following checks?
127483, City of Monterey, $9,693.59 for "professional services - legal
What legal services?
127473, Event Reimbursement, $20,820. From the description, this appears to be for Richard
Tavener's events. Could you please tell me what the money paid for?
127469, Stradling et al, $12,166 .
What legal services is the firm providing besides processing PRA requests?
I
,tany thanks,
Mary
(831) 274-8660

Request No. 2014-21

Information Requested: Why you asked for Wonderspace to be removed from
agenda and if/when it will return

,, )
Due Date: 2--} r5)/f
(Office Use Only(
File No.: J-.u I '1- 2/
(Office Use Only}
Date of Request:

Requested By: MAf--L/ ScWFY
Company: C:.Q\JS
Address:
Phone, Fax, Email:

fQ
r0z v fl!l eX!._
k2CLLt:=
()(\ cc ex N .<)_
I
cc;: u..J ',st

eli i
Date Desired:
47 ;:Y 0/ ;::::;-
9o pvj c'--2.-
(City has 10 days to determine whether the request In whole or inpart is a disclosabl.-,(u'blic record pursuant to GCS 6253(C).
Persons/Departments to provide information: {Office Use Only)

Done: V Date: 9/5/J 't'
, ,
Request Approved by City Attorney:---- Disclosable Records: -----
Need for Extension Past 10 Days: _______ Due Date:--------
If yes, was written notification sent:------ Date: ----------
Cost Associated with Request: --------Total: $ ________ _
Request completed by:----------Date Completed: -------
1
) Attach receipt of original request and Invoice if applicable
Ca;yl 8etancur
Jason Stilwell crom:
mt:
fo:
Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:15PM
Daryl Betancur
Subject: FW: Wonderspace Carmel
Daryl: please add to the log as a media inquiry. Thanks, Jason
Sent: Wednesday, February 05J 2014 10:59 AM
To: Jason Stilwell
Subject : Wonderspace Carmel
Hi Jason,
Could you please tell me why you asked for it to be removed from the agenda} and if/when it
will return?
Thanks!
Mary
(831) 274-8660
1

Request No. 2014-22

Information Requested: Inquiry about Wonderspace Carmel

Daryl Betancur
Jason Stilwell r.,.om:
nt:
To:
Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:00AM
Daryl Betancur
Subject: Media Inquiry
Please add to the PRA log that David Schmalz of the Monterey County Weekly had a media inquiry regarding
Wonderspace
Jason Stilwell
City Administrator
Carmel -by-the-Sea, CA 93921
831-620-2000
1

Request No. 2014-23

Information Requested: Follow-up to 2013 request. Various claims

Jason Stilwell , City Administrator
City of Carmel
February 11, 2014
Page 3
Request
Please produce all of the requested records to this Office no later than
February 18, 2014 at 5:00PM. Please contact me with any questions.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
\I , A-h
1\ ~ u .
I \vv"" .::- /
~ n n i f e r ary )
\
Michael W. Stamp
Molly Erickson
Olga Mikheeva
Jennifer McNary
STAMP I ERICKSON
Attorneys at Law
February 11, 2014
479 Pacific Street, Suite One
Monterey, California 93940
T: (831) 373-1214
F: (831) 373-0242
Jason Stilwell, City Administrator
City of Carmel
City Hall
P.O. Box CC
Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA 93921
Subject: City's Response to our Public Records Requests
Dear Mr. Stilwell:
On January 14, 2014, I met with the City Clerk at City Hall to inspect records
responsive to our various publ ic records requests to the City. After reviewing a portion
of the records, the Clerk came in to check on me and see how my inspection was
going. I told him that I had a few questions about the records, and he quickly
responded that I needed to put my questions in writing because he was in the middle of
an election and very busy. I asked if there was anyone else I could speak with, perhaps
you, but I was told you were "with Sue," and were unavailable.
It would have been much more efficient for all parties to discuss my questions
during my inspection. However, because the City was unable to take the time to assist
me in person, I am providing my questions in writing.
October 16. 2013 Public Records Request
It appears that the City did not produce any documents in response to request 2
for "Resumes, or equivalent records for employees hired to fill positions that are
management level or above and the person was hired by the City at any time during
that last five years."
The City's response stated that it has responsive records, but it does not appear
that any responsive records were produced by the City. Please tell us whether the
records were withheld, and if so, under which claim of exemption or privilege. If the
City's position is that it did produce responsive records, please tell us which records are
responsive to request 2.
October 22, 2013 Request Regarding John Hanson
The City's November 15, 2013 response to our request for records regarding
John Hanson stated "the City believes that you already have a copy of all disclosable
public records in the City's possession that would be responsive to your October 22,
2013 request for documents related to John Hanson's personnel records and,
therefore, will refrain from providing a duplicate copy unless requested to do so."
Jason Stilwell, City Administrator
City of Carmel
February 11, 2014
Page 2
When we inspected records on January 14, 2014, it appeared that the City
produced many documents regarding Mr. Hanson, a stack nearly an inch thick. Were
these documents duplicative or produced for the first time? The City stated it would not
be producing Mr. Hanson's personnel records. If they are new records, we would like to
review them.
October 22. 2013 Reguest - Employee Contracts and Status
Request 1 sought "All employee employment contracts and/or employment
agreements with the City in effect any time in the last 10 years." In response, the City
produced multiple employment agreements, however, the signatures of the employee,
City Administrator and City Clerk were redacted for most of the agreements. Please
produce a complete, unredacted copy of each of the employment agreements.
Request 3 sought:
Resumes of applicants, job applications and job offers for
the following positions, including when an employee was
hired or promoted or placed on temporary or ongoing leave,
if at all, at any time in the last five years.
a. City Manager
b. Planning & Building Services Manager
c. Chief of Police
d. Human Resources Manager (or equivalent position)
In its November 15, 2013 response, the City stated that it had responsive
records, but it does not appear that any responsive records were produced by the
City. Please tell us whether the records were withheld, and if so, under which
claim of exemption or privilege. If the City's position is that it did produce
responsive records, please tell us which records are responsive to request 3.
December 5. 2013 Public Records Request
Request 1 sought the resignation letter of Heidi Burch, the former City
Clerk, which the City produced for inspection. However, Ms. Burch's signature
was redacted. Please produce a complete, unredacted copy of the letter.
In its December 20, 2013 response, the City stated that it had records
responsive to request 2 which sought Government Code claims filed with the
City, but the City did not produce any claims. Where are these records?
CAll ORNIA PUBLIC R
(PROGRAM 353)
OFFICE USE ONLY
Completed by: __ _
Total Cost:
PRA No. Z uJt'- Z.3 DATE: '2.- }/1/ ) Y
Stilwell 0
Betancuro
staff on implementing the Stilwell 0
Ongoing Reimbursable Activities
lsted below (one-time per employee) Betancuro
a copy of a
.. record in the electronic format
format is one used by the
""""""''v to create copies for own use
lextenc:led due to "unusal circumstances"
as defined by GC Section 6253 cX1)-{4),
forth the reasons of the extension
date on which a determination is
expectE!CI to be dispatched
written notice to the requestor
a request Is denied MAY INCLUDE
review of the written language In the
DOES NOT INCLUDE LEGAL
requests to Inspect a public record or
a copy of a public record. (Identify
.,.,,,..n,,., and Information
nP-rtaincina to request; describe the
, technology and physical
,bcation in which the records exist;
provide suggestions for overcoming any
1 pr.ac;tjical basis for denying access to the
or information sought)
ak &company
C/1-
Name(s)
Department
Total Time Spent:
Position
Average
Minutes
11112/2013
POST OFFICE BOX CC CARMEL-BY-
THE-SEA, CA 93921
(831) 620-2000
March 27, 2014
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL to: mcnary@stamplaw.us
Jennifer McNary
Law Offices of Michael W. Stamp
Monterey, CA 93940
Phone: (831) 373-1214
E-mail : mcnary@stamplaw. us
Re: Inspection of Records Responsive to Public Records Requests. (No.
2014-23)
Dear Ms. McNary:
The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea ("City") is in receipt of your letter of March 25,
2014 ("Letter") that proposes to resolve all outstanding issues regarding the records
requests included in the above-referenced demand. The City has reviewed your
proposal and provides the following response:
1. You were advised on March 20, 2014 that public records responsive to your
request were available for pickup. To date, you have elective not to retrieve those
public records. Regardless, and notwithstanding the fact that the City is not
legally obligated to send such public records to you via First Class Mail or hand
delivery, the City will, in a show of good faith and to ensure that this matter is
resolved promptly, send (i) all responsive public records as described in the
City' s email dated March 20, 2014 and (ii) all responsive public records regarding
John Hanson by First Class Mail within two (2) business days of receipt of the
duplication and shipping charges specified below. If you prefer not to incur
shipping charges, you may elect to retrieve the records from City Hall after
paying the duplication charges.
2. Copies of the employee contracts and Burch resignation Jetter that do not have
redacted signatures have been available to you since March 20, 2014. These
will be provided to you per the terms of paragraph 1, above.
3. The City certifies that it has produced all non-privileged/protected public records
responsive to your requests.
4. Duplication charges for the responsive public records are $21 .50; shipping costs
are $4.50, for a total of $26.00.
DOCSOC/1660793v1/102910-0002
March 27, 2014
Page Two
5. Please provide a check payable to "The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea" in the
amount of the duplication charges, or duplication plus shipping charges, as
stated above and as applicable.
Every effort has been made to search for all of the records which might fall within
the scope of your records requests, and, as such, the City believes that its search is
quite thorough. However, if you have knowledge of a specific document which has not
been provided in response to your requests, please notify the City and the City will be
happy to search for and, if found, provide the document(s) to you unless, of course, it is
exempt from disclosure pursuant to Government Code 6254 and/or other applicable
privilege. If you are aware of any legal authority that would require disclosure of
documents in addition to those provided, please advise the undersigned and the City
will reconsider its position accordingly.
If you have questions about any of the foregoing, please contact me at 831-620-
2000.
Very truly yours,
9*
Jason Stilwell
City Administrator
DOCSOC/1660793v1/1 02910-0002
From: Jennifer McNary [mcnary@stamplaw.us]
Sent: Tuesday, February 2014 3:37 PM
To: Jason Stilwell
Subject: City's Response to our Public Records Requests Mr. Stilwell :
Attached is correspondence from this Office. Please contact me with any questions.
Thank you,
Jennifer McNary
STAMP I ERICKSON
CA 93940
831-373-1214
fax: 831-373-0242
1
POST OFFICE BOX CC
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA, CA 93921
(831) 620-2000
February 18, 2014
Jennifer McNary
Monterey, CA 93940
Phone: (831) 373-1214
E-mail: mcnary@stamplaw.us
Re: Inspection of Records Responsive to Public Records Requests. (Nos.
2013-8; 2013-9; 2013-10; 2013-42)
Dear Ms. McNary:
The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea ("City") in receipt of your letter of February 11,
2014 ("Letter") that includes questions related to your inspection of various public
records on January 14, 2014. The City has reviewed your questions and provides the
followi ng response:
Oct. 16, 2013 (No. 2013-1 0)
Request 2 - Resumes or Equivalent Records
No records were withheld. The City produced all responsive documents in its
possession, which notably consisted only of hiring announcements.
Oct 22. 2013 (No. 2013-8)
John Hanson Documents
The records produced were additional documents found, not duplicative of
documents found in the personnel file already obtained by your office.
Oct 22, 2013 (No. 2013-9)
Request 1- All Employee Contracts
The City takes its responsibility as the steward of the personal information of its
DOCSOC/1656445v1/ 102910-0002
February 18, 2014
Page Two
employees, including the image of their signatures, very seriously. "Personal identifiers"
and/or confidential information may be redacted. (See International Federation of
Professional & Technical Engineers, Loca/21, AFL-CIO v. Superior Court (2007) 42
Cal. 4th 319; ACLU v. Deukmejian (1982) 32 Cal.3d 440; Times Mirror Co. v. Superior
Court {1991) 53 Cal. 3d 1325; The California Constitution Article I, Section 1.) If you are
aware of authority that would require the disclosure of this personal information, please
provide the same.
Request 3 - Employee Contracts and Status
The City provided all of the requested employee contracts it has in its
possession. The City does not possess resumes, job applications or offer letters and
does not have a compilation exhibiting when employees were hired, promoted or placed
on temporary or ongoing leave at any time in the last five years.
Dec. 5, 2013 (No. 2013-42)
Request 1- Resignation Letter of Heidi Burch
The City takes its responsibility as the steward of the personal information of its
employees, including the image of their signatures, very seriously. "Personal identifiers"
and/or confidential information may be redacted. (See International Federation of
Professional & Technical Engineers, Loca/21, AFL-CIO v. Superior Court (2007) 42
Cal. 4th 319; A CLU v. Deukmejian (1982) 32 Cal.3d 440; Times Mirror Co. v. Superior
Court(1991) 53 Cal.3d 1325; The California Constitution Article I, Section 1.) If you are
aware of authority that would require the disclosure of this personal information, please
provide the same.
Request 2 -All Government Claims
The City is nearly complete with its search for the requested government claims.
A majority of the records responsive to this request are now available for review. If you
prefer to obtain the currently available records prior to the availability of all the records
to be compiled, please contact Daryl Betancur to schedule a time for you to pick up the
currently available records. Please be advised that the City will not release the currently
available records until it has received payment for the direct cost of duplication pursuant
to California Government Code section 6253(b ). The direct cost incurred by the City for
duplication is $0.10 per page. The estimate direct cost for the currently available
documents is $13.90. Please be prepared to provide a check made payable to the "City
of Carmel-by-the-Sea" for the direct costs of duplication incurred by the City at the time
you pick up the available records.
DOCSOC/1656445v1/1 0291 0-0002
February 18, 2014
Page Three
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions about any of
the foregoing responses, please contact me at 831-620-2000.
DOCSOC/ 1656445v1/ 1 02910-0002
Very truly yours,
Jason Stilwell
City Administrator
POST OF-FICE BOX CC
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEJI., CA 93921
(831) 620-2000
February 28, 2014
Jennifer McNary
4 73 Pacific Street, Suite One
Monterey, CA 93940
Phone: (831) 373-1214
E-mail: mcnary@stamplaw.us
Re: Inspection of Records Responsive to Public Records Requests. (No. 2014-
23)
Dear Ms. McNary:
The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea ("City") is in receipt of your letter of February 20,
2014 ("Letter") that includes a continuation of demands related to your inspection of
various public records on January 14, 2014. The City has reviewed your demands and
provides the following response:
Oct 22, 2013 (No. 2013-9)
All Employee Contracts
The City will confer with legal counsel and send a respond in due time.
Dec. 5, 2013 (No. 2013-42)
Resignation Letter of Heidi Burch
The City will confer with legal counsel and send a respond in due time.
All Government Claims
The City has completed its compilation of all government claims responsive to
your request. Please contact Daryl Betancur to schedule a time for you to pick up the
records. Please be advised that the City will not release the currently available records
until it has received payment for the direct cost of duplication pursuant to California
Government Code section 6253(b).
Please also be advised that every effort has been made to search for all of the
records which might fall within the scope of your records request, and, as such, we
believe our search is quite thorough. However, if you have knowledge of a specific
document which has not been provided in response to your request, please notify us and
we will be happy to provide the document(s) to you unless, of course, it is exempt from
disclosure pursuant to Government Code Section 6254. If you are aware of any legal
authority that would require disclosure of documents in addition to those identified
above, please advise the undersigned and the City will reconsider its position accordingly
Oct 22, 2013 (No. 2013-8)
John Hanson Documents
Please be aware that costs have already been incurred for the copies previously
produced at your January 14, 2014 inspection and, therefore, the City will not release the
records until it has received payment for the direct cost of duplication pursuant to
California Government Code section 6253(b).
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions about any of
the foregoing responses, please contact me at 831-620-2000.
Jason Stilwell
City Administrator
Daryl Betancur
t:rom: Daryl Betancur
.ent:
To:
Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:19PM
Jennifer McNary
Cc:
Subject:
Jennifer,
Jason Stilwell; Daryl Betancur
PRA 2014-23
I have been provided with 215 pages of documents for you to pick up here at city hall. There are 75 pages worth of
contracts for: Calhoun, Cubbage, Stilwell, Goss, Mclnchak, Friedrichsen, Lopez-Frincke, Miller, Guillen, Burch, and
Hanson; and 140 pages worth of claim information for a total of 215 pages at 10 cents. Please have a check payable to
the City of Carmel by the Sea as you have been previously advised before these records are provide to you. Please advise
me as to when you wish to pick these up.
If you have any questions, you can ask our legal counsel or Mr. Stilwell's Office.
Regards,
Daryl A. Betancur, CMC, MPA
Office of the City Administrator
P. 0. Box CC
:=armel, California 93921
Phone 831-620-2000
Fax: 831-620-2004
1

Request No. 2014-24

Information Requested: Is sign at 100 Dolores permitted? And agenda dates for
planning commission

Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:4e PM
To: Rob Mullane
Subject: Re: 1ee Dolores Street
21)/j :J l(
'
Thanks, Rob. It's not urgent, so whenever you have a couple of moments, I'd be interested in
hearing the answer. I'd also like to know if the sign they put on the building with the
address on it is in compliance .
Speaking of the PC meeting, if you can get the agenda to me today or tomorrow morning, I can
do a little blurb in the paper so people know it will be on Tuesday instead of Wednesday.
Thanks!
Mary
On Feb 5, 2e14, at 3:31PM, Rob Mullane <RMullane@ci.carmel . ca.us> wrote :
>
> I would have to research the history of that business before being able to respond to your
inqui ry. We are preparing the Planning Commission packet today and tomorrow, but I can try to
get to this sometime next week.
'>
> Robert A. Mullane) AICP
1
> Community Planning and Building Director City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
> P.O. Drawer G Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA 93921 main (831) 620-2010 direct
> (831) 620-2057 rmullane@ci.carmel. ca.us
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary Schley [mailto :mary@carmelpinecone. com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 5:58 PM
> To: Rob Mullane
> Subject: 100 Dolores Street
>
> Hi Rob,
>
>I'd like to know how Mail Mart has a numbered address, too ...
>
> Thanks!
> Mary
>
2

Request No. 2014-25

Information Requested: Copies of Agreements or other authorizations for
communications provider access to public rights of way

March 20, 2014
Jason Stilwell
City Administrator
Carmel-by-the-Sea
Post Office Box CC
Carmel, CA 93921
iCommLaw
1547 Palos Verdes, #298
Walnut Creek, CA 94597-2228
Phone: 415.699.788s
Re: Request for Records under the
California Public Records Act
Dear Mr. Stilwell,
This will acknowledge your response to our Request for Records under
the CPRA and your request for an extension.
Kindly make available your responsive documents on a rolling basis, as
your office locates them. We will pay the copying charges, however, if
documents exist in an electronic form, we would like to receive those
via email. We would like to confirm that there is no per-page charge
for electronic copies.
Thank you.
/s/Arllta Taff-Rice
Jason Stillwell, City Manager
Carmel-By-The-Sea City Hall
P.O. BoxCC
Carmel CA 93921
iCommLaw
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Phone: (415) 699-7885
Facsimile: (925) 274-0988
anita@icommlaw.com
February 18, 2014
Re: California Public Records Request
Dear Mr. Stillwell,
:J_o 1'/- 1_5
Pursuant to the California Public Records Act ("CPRA"),
1
I am writing to request
disclosure and copies of any agreements or other authorizations for communications
provider access to public rights of way ("ROW") in Carmel. Specifically, we are
requesting copies of all of the following:
1. Any agreement, contract or other arrangement granting a communications carrier
(including but not limited to incumbent local exchange carriers, competitive local
exchange carriers, interexchange carriers, wireless carriers, VoiP providers) rights
to attach to or use city infrastructure including but not limited to utility poles,
conduit, street lights and traffic signals;
2. Any franchise, attachment, or right-of-way agreement (including any settlement
agreements or letters of understanding or_intent in lieu of such agreements) for, or
related to, the provision of communications services or construction of
telecommunication facilities or infrastructures used for telecommunications
between Carmel and any carriers or providers, including but not limited to
(incumbent local exchange carriers, competitive local exchange carriers,
interexchange carriers, wireless carriers, VoiP providers).
All of the requested materials meet the definition of "public records" in Section 6252( e),
and that none of the exemptions set forth in Section 6254 apply. Further, the City of
Carmel meets the definition oflocal agencies in Section 6252(a) and (d) subject to the
requirements of CPRA. Therefore, the City is obligated to make these documents
available. If the requested documents are maintained in an electronic format, I am hereby
requesting that the City make them available in that same format, pursuant to Section
6253.9. If the requested documents are maintained in paper form, I am requesting that
copies be made available to me.
1
Cal. Gov' t. Code 6250 et seq.
',
Jason Stillwell
Re: California Public Records Request
February 18, 2014
neTsM
SYSTEMS
As you are aware, the California Legislature has declared that "access to infonnation
concerning the conduct of the people's business is a fundamental and necessary right of
every person in this state. "
2
CPRA favors disclosure, and CPRA exemptions must be
narrowly construed.
3
I look forward to your response within 10 days, on February 28, 2014, as required by
Section 6253( c). Please contact me at the address and phone below to make
arrangements for the copying and pick up of the requested materials.
If there are any fees for searching or copying these records, please inform me. However,
I would also like to request a waiver of all fees in that the disclosure of requested
information is in the public interest.
Please mail all copies to:
Or Fax to: 925-274-0988
iCommLaw
154 7 Palos Verdes #298
Or e-mail to: anita@icommlaw.com
Please don't hesitate to contact me if you require clarification about this request. Thank
you for your prompt attention.
Sincerely,
Is/Anita Taff-Rice
~ C a l Gov't. Code 6250: "In enacting this chapter, the Legislature, mindful of the right of
individuals to privacy, finds and declares that access to information concerning the conduct of the
people's business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state."
J See, e.g., American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California v. Superior Court (ACLU)
(2011) 202 Cal. App. 4th 55, 67; and Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court(l991) 53 Cal.3d 1325.
2
February 28, 2014
City of Carmel -by-the-Sea
POST OFFICE BOX CC
C.A.RMEL-BY-THE-SEA, C.A. 9392 1
(8.31) 620 2000
VIA EMAIL ONLY TO: anita@icommlaw.com
Anita Taff-Rice
iCommLaw
anita@icommlaw.corn
Re: Response to Public Records Request (No. 2014-25)
Dear Ms. Taff-Rice:
The City of Carmel-By-The-Sea ("City") received your emailed California Public
Records Act ("PRA") request on February 18, 2014. This further response is sent on my
authority as City Administrator.
After review of the PRA, the City has determined that due to the need to search for,
collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records,
the City requires an extension of time pursuant to California Government Code Section
6253 in order to adequately determine whether the Records Request, in whole or in part,
seeks copies of disclosable public records in the possession of the City and provide notice
of the reasons therefor. The City expects to provide its determination no later than March
14, 2014.
The City appreciates your patience with regard to this matter. Should you have any
questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 831-620-2000.
Very truly yours,
Jason Stilwell
~ < 7 : >
City Administrator
DOCSOC/1657864vl/102910-0002

Request No. 2014-26

Information Requested: See original request Elections Information

Due Date: } I J :J.u J lJ
(Office Use On y) J
File No.:)..()}
(Office Use Only)
Date of Request: ___. ...
Requested By: Cf10 cl1cE C P\.
Company: ---------'Wif/IL--1/t.....&,.d''---------------
Address=------------------------------
Phone, Fax, Email:------------------------------
Info Requested (be specific): ____
"\,)"':v
Date Desired:-------------------------------
In certain circumstances, the 10 date determination may be extended to an addition 14days so long as persons are advised.)
Persons/Departments to provide information: (Office Use Onlvt Done:/ Date: ::Jc)}
Request Approved by City Attorney:----- Disclosable Records: -----
Need for Extension Past 10 Days:--------Due Date: ________ _
Cost Associated with Request:-------- Total:$. _________ _
Request completed by:----------Date Completed:-------
Attach receipt of request and Invoice if applicable
Daryl Betancur
From:
ent :
fo:
Cc:
Subject:
Daryl Betancur
Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:36 PM
candace cate
Daryl Betancur; Don Freeman
RE: More questions
1. The copy of the law that says a write-in candidate cannot put a statement in the voters voting
pamphlet;---- all the forms ami stal(:mcnt need to be submitted hy a certain date <md a v:ritc-in candidate is
beyond that dntc. It would keep the hook. from being printcJ on thus holding up maili ng anJ all other
dates
2. The deadline to submit it; ----The candidate statement process has passed.
3. Who is printing the voters pamphlet;---Martin nnd Chapman is our Elections Consultant.
If you could email us and call him with the answers, that would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Candace Cate
'1y way of this email, I am also copying our city attorney.
Daryl A. Betancur, CMC, MPA
Office of the City Administrator
P. 0 . Box CC
Carmel, California 93921
Phone 831-620-2000
Fax: 831-620-2004
From: candace cate [mailto:candacercate2004@yahoo.com]
Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:00 PM
b: Daryl Betancur
Subject: More questions

Request No. 2014-27

Information Requested: Various Planning Topics

Due Date: 3} ?- J }lj
File No.: l Y--2 'J
(Office Use Only) (Office Use Only)
Date of Request:
J1fi} Jl:j
Requested By:
V\ t'\fbt
Company:

Address:
Phone, Fax, fmail:
tA01 fJ- -:r-N

tJ::2UL.rL,..;B- /UJ {2ll.'
Date Desired:
Persons/Departments to provide information: (Office Use Only) Done: V' Date: Z./2cl })t.;
>
{JLtt"/J;rV ..
Request Approved by City Attorney: Disclosable Records:-----
Need for Extension Past 10 Days: Due Date:---------
If yes, was written notification sent: Date: ----------
Cost Associated with Request: Total:$ _________ _
Request completed by: Date Completed:-------
' ) Attach receipt of request and Invoice if applicable
Daryl Betancur
(/1ro74 f/J1u!L-:J-
e.
From:
;ent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jason and Daryl,
Rob Mullane
Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:09 PM
Jason Stilwell
Daryl Betancur
press contact re: La Rambla Building and Da Giovanni Cellars wine tasting room
For our press contacts log ... I had a call and an email from Mary Schley asking about two issues: the posting as Unsafe to
Occupy of the La Rambla Building on the West side of Lincoln between Ocean and th, and the Planning Commission's
approval of Da Giovanni Cellars Tasting Room proposed for Dolores between 5
1
h and 6
1
h.
I informed her that the La Rambla Building was posted for public safety reasons by our Building Official. I noted that
there were structural issues as well as electrical issues. She asked for more details, and I indicated that I would send her
our letter to the owner. This letter has the details from engineering and electrician reports.
For Da Giovanni, I clarified the condition of approval that was approved by the Commission and noted that this item has
been requested for reconsideration with this (reconsideration) action scheduled for the Commission's next meeting on
March 11
1
h.
She asked about the Building Official position, and I indicated that I was hopeful that the new BO would be in place
sometime in March. She asked how many applications we received and I noted that this was a personnel issue.
Including this update, I spent a total of 15 minutes on these press inquiries.
Robert A. Mullane, AICP
Community Planning and Building Director
P.O. Drawer G
Carmel -by-the-Sea, CA 93921
main {831) 620-2010
direct (831) 620-2057
rmullane@ci.carmel.ca.us
1

Request No. 2014-28

Information Requested: Information on Street designated as 3rd & J unipero and
Torres related to a claim

LLC
700 I E Fish Lake Road -Suite l 00 - Maple Grove, MN 5531 I
PO Box 47604 - Minneapolis, MN 55447
866-233-0353- Fax: 866-233-9627
February 25, 2014
Public Works Streets Supervisor
City of Cannel-by-the-Sea
POBox SS
Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA 93921
Re: California Public Records Act request
I am writing to request the specific documents and records as indicated below, pursuant
to the California Public Records Act 6250 et seq.
The requested docwnents and records are as follows:
The Claims Center, LLC is representing AT&T for the purpose of damage claim
resolution. We are attempting to locate information concerning a street in Carmel-
by-the-Sea: 3rd Ave, between Junipero St and Torres St.
During a project done at this location, a buried communication line was damaged.
We are working with AT&T to resolve this issue.
We are requesting copies of Right of Way, Street Cut, Excavation, Construction,
Driveway, Encroachment, Utility, and Sidewalk permits that would have been
issued to allow excavation at this location that would have been in force and valid
on August 30, 2013. Please provide copies of any permits and applications found,
along with the Certificate of General Liability insurance if one was required to
obtain the permit.
This request includes copies of every document related to the matter, regardless of the
format in which the information is stored.
I request copies of these records provided, either by mail, facsimile, or email, whichever
is most prudent for your office.
PO Box 47604, Minneapolis, MN 55447
I agree to pay the fees covering direct costs of duplication, or a statutory fee if applicable.
However, if you anticipate that in order to satisfy this request, "extensive use" of
information technology resources or extensive clerical or supervisory assistance will be
required, please provide a written estimate and justification. Otherwise, when the
documentation is complete, provide us with the cost and funds will be forwarded, prior to
disbursement of the documents.
If you refuse to provide this information, please advise me in writing and indicate the
applicable exemption to the Public Records Act. Also, please state with particularity the
reasons for your decision. If the exemption you are claiming only applies to a portion of
the records, please delete that portion and provide photocopies of the remainder of the
records.
The California Public Records Act requires a response within ten business days. If
access to the records I am requesting will take longer, please contact me with information
about when I might expect copies of the requested records.
If you have any questions or need more information in order to expedite this request,
please call me at 866-233-0353 ext 1039.
Our ftle number is 133526
{Jl!tldli
Clark A. Natalie
The Claims Center, LLC
Damage Claims Research
7001 E Fish Lake Road, Suite 100
Maple Grove, MN 55311
866-233-0353 ext 1039
Fax 866-233-9627
clark.natalie@theclaimscenter.com
reference PACBCN2014010J0054.
Daryl Betancur
From:
~ e n t
fo:
Subject:
Attachments:
From : Clark Natalie
Subject : request for information and documentation
Please review the attached request for information and documentation.
Should you have questions, I can be reached at 866-233-0353 ext 1039.
Our file is 133526
Clark A Natalie
reference
866-233-0353 ext 1039
Fax 866-233-9627
clark. natalie@theclaimscenter. com
PACBCN2014010J0054
Caution: The information contained in this email transmission is confidential and intended only for the use of
addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any retention or
copying of this facsimile is prohibited. Please, notify sender of erroneous transmission and destroy original
immediately.
1
March 7, 2014
BY-THE-SEA, CA 93921 (e.31)
6202000
VIA EMAIL ONLY TO: clark.natalie@theclaimscenter.com
Clark A. Natalie
700 I E Fish Lake Road, Suite I 00
Maple Grove, MN 553 I I
Phone: 866-233-0353 ext 1039
Fax: 866-233-9627
clark.natalie@theclaimscenter .com
Dear Mr. Natalie:
The City of Carmel-By-The-Sea ("City") received your California Public Records
Act ("PRA") request on February 26, 2014. This response is sent on my authority as City
Administrator.
the City requires an extension of time pursuant to California Government Code Section
21, 2014.
Very truly yours,
. o ~ 4 ~ d t 4 . .
..J
Jason Stilwell
City Administrator
DOCSOC/1658482v1/102910-0002
March 21,2014
I OSl OFFICE' BOX CC GARti.EL-
flY-THE-SE:A. CA9392 1 (831)
620-2000
VIA EMAIL ONLY TO: clark.natalie@tbeclaimscenter.com
Clark A. Natalie
700 I E Fish Lake Road, Suite 100
Phone: 866-233-0353 ext 1039
Fax: 866-233-9627
clark.natal ie@theclaimscenter .com
Dear Mr. Natalie:
The City of Carmel-By-The-Sea ("City") received your California Public Records
Act ("PRA") request on February 26, 2014. This response is sent on my authority as City
Administrator.
the City requires an extension oftime pursuant to California Government Code Section
31, 2014.
Very truly yours,
Jason ;<tll
: ~ ; ; .
City Administrator
DOCSOC/1658482vl/102910-0002
April 7, 2014
BY-THE-SEA, CA 93921
(831) 620-2000
VIA EMAIL ONLY TO: clark.natalie@theclaimscenter.com
Clark A. Natalie
Phone: 866-233-0353 ext 1039
Fax: 866-233-9627
clark.natalie@theclaimscenter.com
Dear Mr. Natalie:
This letter is in response to your California Public Records Act request received by
the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea ("City") on February 26, 2014 ("PRA"). This response is
sent on my authority as City Administrator.
The City has determined that is has disclosable public records responsive to your
request. City staff continues to search for and compile records responsive to your Records
Request. The City estimates that the responsive records will be ready for review on or
about April22, 2014. The City will contact you as soon as the responsive records become
available. The City thanks you in advance for your patience.
Please be advised that the City will not release the records until it has received
payment for the direct cost of duplication pursuant to California Government Code section
6253(b ). Please be prepared to provide a check made payable to the "City of Carmel-by-
the-Sea" for the direct costs of duplication incurred by the City at the time you pick up the
available records. You will be informed of the cost amount once your records become
available.
Every effort has been made to search for all of the records which might fall within
the scope of your records request, and, as such, the City believes that its search is quite
thorough. However, if you have knowledge of a specific document which has not been
provided in response to your requests, please notify the City and the City will be happy to
search for and, if found, provide the document( s) to you unless, of course, it is exempt
from disclosure pursuant to Government Code 6254 and/or other applicable privilege. If
you are aware of any legal authority that would require disclosure of documents in addition
to those provided, please advise the undersigned and the City will reconsider its position
accordingly.
Page 2
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions about any of the
foregoing responses, please contact me at 831-620-2000.
Very truly yours,
~ w e l l
City Administrator
DOCSOC/1658482vl/102910-0002

Request No. 2014-29

Information Requested: new PRA policy

Due Date: 3,/r/(Y
(Office Use Only)
File No.: A41Y- 2-f
(Office Use Only)
THIS PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST FORM ITSElF CONSTITUES A PUBLIC RECORD AND IS SUBJECT TO PUBLIC
DISClOSURE UPON REQUEST. Fill out info in box only
Date of Request:
z,. L-z 1 I'- 'r:.
4
Requested By:tJ2tiJrly t""tJ/
Company:

Address:
Phone, Fax, Email:
Info Requested (be specific): t8/A/
I
N /4
d1/L/224
f"

.,-
Date Desired:
(City has 10 days to determine whether the request In whole or inpart Is a disclosable public record pursuant to GCS 6253(C).
In certain circumstances, the 10 date determination may be extended to an addition 14days so long as persons are advised.)
Persons/Departments to provide information: (Office Use Only) Done: Date-:z/2.
1
/17
Request Approved by City Attorney: ---- Disclosable Records:-----
Need for Extension Past 10 Days:--------Due Date: --------
Cost Associated with Request:-------- Total: $. _________ _
Request completed by:----------Date Completed: -------
,J Attach receipt of original request and invoice if applicable

PRA LOG February 2014

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PRA LOG February 2014

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST LOG 2014

Page 2 Current as of 10/17/2014 Time: 9:24 AM

429 l 2?. r f% _ 1!Q_. - Es-:=- G __ I _R __ _

You might also like