This evaluation report provides ratings and comments on various aspects of a Toastmasters meeting. The categories evaluated include: start, visitors, introductions, program, table topics, speakers, evaluations, timing, and fun. Each category is rated on a scale from excellent to needs improvement. The report aims to assess how smoothly and effectively the different meeting elements were handled.
This evaluation report provides ratings and comments on various aspects of a Toastmasters meeting. The categories evaluated include: start, visitors, introductions, program, table topics, speakers, evaluations, timing, and fun. Each category is rated on a scale from excellent to needs improvement. The report aims to assess how smoothly and effectively the different meeting elements were handled.
This evaluation report provides ratings and comments on various aspects of a Toastmasters meeting. The categories evaluated include: start, visitors, introductions, program, table topics, speakers, evaluations, timing, and fun. Each category is rated on a scale from excellent to needs improvement. The report aims to assess how smoothly and effectively the different meeting elements were handled.
General Evaluator: __________________________________________ Date: ___________________
Category Description Rating Comments Start On Time? Were the call to order !elcome and opening remar"s handled smoothly and orderly? Was the room prepared #$anner gavel chair agenda %allot sheet &ood' (isitors )o! many present? Was visitor as"ed to introduce him* hersel&? Was guest made to &eel li"e the most important person in the room? Were they given an in&ormation %rochure and mem%ership &orm? +ntroductions Consider all introductions: Toastmaster (isitors Ta%le Topics ,aster Spea"ers - Evaluators. Were they appropriate include name and title? /rogram Did every mem%er spea"? Were all the roles &illed %e&ore the meeting? Did any mem%er cancel their speech or their role on the day %e&ore the day o& the meeting? Ta%le Topics Was segment e0plained !ell? Did mem%ers not on the program participate? Were the topics appropriate? Was time used e&&iciently? Spea"ers Did they use and &ollo! their manuals? Were they !ell prepared? Evaluations Were the o%1ectives discussed and &ocused on? )o! help&ul !ere they? Were the recommendations appropriate? Consider thoroughness length and tact. Timing Were the time limits o%served? Did the meeting &lo! smoothly? Did it drag any!here? 2un Did the mem%ers have &un? Did 3O4 en1oy it? What !as the tone o& the meeting? Was it a sa&e and supportive learning environment? Ratings : 56 E0cellent 7 6 Good #8%ove 8verage' 9 6 Satis&actory #8verage' : ; Should +mprove < 6 ,ust +mprove #Re=uires immediate attention'