Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design of Tower Foundations-NS and Vasanthi
Design of Tower Foundations-NS and Vasanthi
Design of
tower
foundations
sections could be designed by using this program. Different
types of soil conditions, viz., normal dry, wet, submerged,
partially submerged. black cotton, wet black cotton, soft rock,
and hard rock, are considered. Based on this procedure, the
authors have designed a 100-m microwave tower foundation
which was executed by the Indian Telephone Industries in
Rajasthan.
Design
There are two parts in the design. They are: stability analysis,
and strength design. Stability analysis aims at removing the
possibility of failure by overturning, uprooting, sliding and
tilting of the foundation due to soil pressure being in excess
of the ultimate capacity of the soil. The strength design consists of proportioning the components of the foundation to
the respective maximum moment, shear, pull and thrust or
combination of the same.
The type of loading that controls the foundation design
depends mainly on the kind of towers being designed. The
controlling design loads for four-legged lattice towers are
vertical uplift, compression and side thrust.
Depending on the site condition and the forces acting on
the tower legs, one of the following types of foundation is
normally employed:
(i) drilled and/or belled shaft
(ii) pad and chimney
(iii) footing with undercut
(iv) auger with reaming
(v) grillage
(vi) special type.
Selection of foundation type needs judgement and experience and a careful study of all the parameters. However, in
India, pad and chimney type of foundation is employed for a
majority of towers, and hence, in this paper, the same type of
foundation is considered, Fig 1. The concrete used for the
135
Mors
T
ti
Matsuo
100
Base plate
Stub angle
Earthcone
Balla
tiC
T
./.
_794 ,94w
Anchor bolts
T.
B1
WNW
4_
Chimney
reinforcement
*N.
10
lb)
(a)
500
300
C, psf
Stub angle
30 20
0,
degree
Tw
813
Benching of hard rock
(d)
c,
H1 = 50mm
H4 225mm
(1)
(2)
+ IP.
(3) *
Side thrust
Pp
-2
P
C
B
(IC M Pp,
Factor of safety against sliding _
22
137
tension and side thrust are acting (which is the critical condition), the above equation is rewritten as
Factor of safety
P,
P.
(4)
Side thrust
W(1
fie')
(5)
AB B
Uprooting of stub
Normally, the stub angle is taken inside the pad portion and
anchored by cleat angle and keying rods. In this case, the
Stub angle
1
pp4
I31_4
Section A-A
CNI
pp3
Pp 2
Pn 1
1-
568
8/6
13/2
(W2/2)5 613
/
(T - Wf ) 8 /3 S(D e H4 ) -E Pp; L a i
Passive pressure
22
tan a .
y 13/2 tan cc
(13/2 - y)
(1 tan a )
( 2y dh ) 2 - dh 2
Neglecting dh,
Ap
4y 2
4 y 2 rc > T
)2. d,'
(6)
where, d h = diameter of the anchor plate or bolt head. Incidentally, it is desirable to keep the effective size of anchor
head as small as possible to reduce embedment requirements 9 .
The program assumes that 2000-mm long, 40-mm diameter rods are used in the rock foundation for anchorage.
Then, assuming a bond stress between the rod and rock as
3 kg/cm 2 , anchor capacity is calculated as
(7)
Then, the following condition has to be satisfied, if the uprooting of stub should not take place
A,. f
T,
and
(8)
(9)
Rock foundation
Anchor type foundation for hard rock
Uplift resistance to anchored footing is provided by the bond
between the grouted steel and rock through the grouting
materials which is usually decided by experiments. This
bond will increase when deformed bars or bars with indentation are used instead of plain rods. Use of eye-bolts, fox-bolts or threaded rods can also increase the uplift capacity.
(14)
(15)
+m
Yes
= I,/ B,
stn.)1(1+ sat 0]
H2
(20)
'Print approximate
values of 13,H2, H3
Yes
(19)
(21)
Calculate Hi
based on bending moment
H3
+ tr,
a ' ,+
22)
va
( 21 /3 +
cre.,
(23)
A,
(24)
140
TABLE 1
Type of soil
1. Dry
2. Wet
3. Partly-submerged
4. Fully-submerged
5. Dry black cotton
6. Wet black cotton
7 Soft rock
8 Wet soft rock
H,
H2
H3
H,,
MM
mm
mm
mm
1450
2050
2180
2450
2150
3080
1480
2320
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
450
820
820
1000
800
1350
540
950
2500
2130
2130
1950
2150
1600
2410
2000
mm
Concrete
volume
m3
Volume of
excavation
m3
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
5.639
9.848
10.638
14.036
10.313
24.775
6.007
12.586
37.979
68.479
76.265
93.775
74.431
141.663
39.288
85.119
Conclusions
The procedures involved in the design of tower foundations
are given. The features of the computer program that has
been developed based on these concepts are explained.
This program takes into account reinforced as well as unreinforced foundations. Similarly, foundations on rocks could
also be designed by this program. For resisting uplift, the
program gives a choice between resistance with and without
passive pressure. Using some iterations, the optimum
foundation details could be arrived at. The program also
gives printouts of the quantities of earthwork excavation,
concrete, reinforcement, etc. Thus, it reduces the tedicus
task of tower foundation design, which may involve only a
few seconds work on a personal computer.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Mr Venkataraman of Indian
Telephone Industries and Mr M. Sundara Raj for the fruitful
discussions.
yi
UBC
kg/m3
degree
kg/cm2
1440
1440
1440
940
1600
1080
1440
1440
30
15
15
15
30
0
20
10
2.6800
1.3675
1.3675
1.3675
1.3675
1.3675
6.2500
3.1250
MAX.THRUST
48400 KG
ULT.UPLIFT
31900 xo
SHEAR
6248 KO
COOK-ANOLZ
SOIL DENSITY
ULT.EIZARING CAPACITY
NORMAL DRY
38 DIG
DETAILS OF NIXIE. FOUNDATION
EASE WIDTH
85D CM
1 WWI TYPE
UPPER 1500 MM NORMAL ORY SOIL LOWER -STRATA SUBMERGED SOIL
PART-SUBM.TYPZ UPPER 750 MN NORMAL DRY SOIL LOWER STRATA SUBMERGED SOIL
DETAILS OF NORMAL DRY TYPE FOUNDATION
BASE- 1450 MM.S0
PAD THK.. 50 PIM
DEPTH. 5000 MN
CHIMNEY WIDTH. 550 MM
DETAILS OF 1ARTn-PYRAMID
VOLUME OF EARTH
38.96464 CU.ST.
WEIGHT. 4 4 519,8 KG
FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST UPROOTING OF STUB 3.508476
F.S. AGAINST UPLIFT WITHOUT PASSIVE PRESSURE 1.503844
FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST DOWN THRUST
1.004495
VOLUME OF CONCRETE FOR TOWER
5.639 CU.M
VOLUM& EARTHWORK EXCAVATION FOR TOWER
37.362 CU.M
MT OF TOTAL STEEL IN FOUNDATION FOR TOWER
0.80 KG
VOLUME OF MAT CONCRETE FOR TOWER
0.612
CU.M
References
R.L. ed., Manual on Transmission Line Towers, Central Board of
Irrigation and Power, New Delhi, March 1977.
1. KHANNA,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. DALLAS,
8.
4
9
10. SyAL, LC., and Goo_ A.K. Reinforced Concrete Structures, A.H. Wheeler
and Company Pvt. Limited, Allahabad, 1984.
141