Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jurisprudence - Findings of Trial Court

    Uploaded by

    BreandanMcLoughlin
    3 views1 page
    Well-settled is the rule that the findings of the trial court on the credibility of witnesses are entitled to the highest respect. The trial court is deemed to have been in a better position to weigh the evidence. As the accused has failed to show that the trial court misappreciated any of the facts before it, there is no reason to deviate from the established doctrine.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Well-settled is the rule that the findings of the trial court on the credibility of witnesses are entitled to the highest respect. The trial court is deemed to have been in a better position to weigh the evidence. As the accused has failed to show that the trial court misappreciated any of the facts before it, there is no reason to deviate from the established doctrine.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Jurisprudence - Findings of Trial Court

    Uploaded by

    BreandanMcLoughlin
    Well-settled is the rule that the findings of the trial court on the credibility of witnesses are entitled to the highest respect. The trial court is deemed to have been in a better position to weigh the evidence. As the accused has failed to show that the trial court misappreciated any of the facts before it, there is no reason to deviate from the established doctrine.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    TRIAL COURT ALONE:

    Well-settled is the rule that the findings of the trial court on the credibility of witnesses and
    their testimonies are entitled to the highest respect. Having seen and heard the witnesses and
    having observed their behavior and manner of testifying, the trial court is deemed to have been
    in a better position to weigh the evidence. (People v. Mostrales, G.R. No. 184925, 15 June 2011,
    citing People v. Sally, G.R. No. 191254, October 13, 2010, citing People v. Ofemiano, G.R. No.
    187155, February 1, 2010, 611 SCRA 250, 256.) As the accused has failed to show that the trial
    court misappreciated any of the facts before it, there is no reason to deviate from the
    established doctrine. (Id.)

    You might also like