You are on page 1of 2

_____X_______

_____X_______
_____X_______

ED215R DDP Key Performance


Feedback
10-15 minute video
Lesson plan
Self assessment (specific to DDP assignment)

Criteria
No
Evidence

Minimal
Evidence
Your lesson plan
was written in
a different
format than we
promoted in
215R. Your
procedures
were unclear
and you never
noted in your
plan that
fluency was one
of your goals.
You wrote a lot
in your self
assessment but
your definition
of shared
reading and the
purposes for
using it werent
written
succinctly.
You never
discussed a WI
Teacher
Standard in
your
assessment.

Sufficient
Evidence
The lesson plan and the clip you
selected demonstrate a clear

understanding of your chosen balanced


literacy component (either read aloud or
shared reading) and how to use it with
literacy learners in your field placement

The self-assessment demonstrates

a thorough understanding of your selected


balanced literacy component

The self-assessment demonstrates

an accurate identification and explanation


of how at least two Alverno Education
Abilities were used to show growth in your
choice of one Wisconsin Standard for
Teacher Development and Licensure

The self-assessment demonstrates

an analysis of the challenges and how they


were addressed

The self-assessment demonstrates

an insightful evaluation of your current


understanding and practice of the

Extensive
Evidence

selected component in the classroom


related to what might you would do
differently in future lessons
The self-reflection paper is wordprocessed and meets Level 3 writing
criteria.

Overall Performance:
Inadequate
X
Emerging
Proficient
Distinctive
9/10

You might also like