magical theme, one that enchanted its audience and took them to a land of dreams. The mishaps along the way were almost instantly dismissed by the way in which the cinematography flowed and the individual character profiling was less focused on. The 2005 remake however, ran more sinister themes through Roald Dahls classic novel. The six ticket winners are constructed to appear more sinful than the original characters. Tim Burtons recreation was immersed in direct language that the audience can connote with gluttony and enrichment, creating such a powerful message through the use of dialogue and characterization Burton gives a dark more sinister feel to the movie therefore adapting his remake for a modern audience who have been desensitized by the material that is shown through different forms of media.
There is also a difference in colour
between both institutions. The 2005 remake constructs a vibrant scene inside of the factory to compare with the drab and dullness of the streets outside. The construction of such vibrant scenes can be put down to the improvements technology had made by 2005. However the colours used in the original feel were warm and soft in comparison to what almost seemed harsh and raw colours in the remake. The idea of having such bold and sharp colours keeps the more sinister theme running throughout the institution.
The role of Willy Wonka in the original institution was
fulfilled by Gene Wilder gave the film a more welcoming feel, the atmosphere was lighter and the setting more humorous. Willy Wonkas role in the novel was to find the perfect suitor who would in the future become a partner to him in running the factory. The original performance of the last scene by Gene Walker its one portrayed with much more emotion. The audience are almost persuaded to rejoice with Charlie and Willy Wonka as he wins the prize. However in the second performance by Johnny Depp the extreme emotions portrayed by Willy Wonka becomes the focus in a scene that should wrap up the destination of the institution. This therefore proves that the individual performance of the actors in the institution were much more important than the institutions true intentions.