Compensation PDF

I

II

III

IV

Table of Contents

II

III

IV

XI

XIV

XV

XVI

I

3/3/1

VI

VII

VIII

IX

XI

XII

XIII

1-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov

t

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

XIV

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

XV

XVI

SPSS

a=0.05

a=0.05

a=0.05

XVII
Abstract
The Effects of The Compensations on The Employees Satisfaction in
the Islamic University in Gaza-Gaza Strip
The Research aims to investigate the effects of the compensation on the Islamic
University of Gaza Employees satisfaction and to reach a recommendations works
to increase and improve the compensations workers obtains and consequently
increase their satisfaction, thats through investigating and analyzing the
compensation obtained by the employees, also thats through determining,
detailing and analyzing its components which effect the employees satisfaction,
The compensations include: the basic salary, the additions to the basic salary
(Allowances), End of service compensation, incentives, services and advantages.
All the aforementioned in addition to analyzing the effects of the personal
characteristics which have financial impacts on the employees satisfaction, these
personal characteristics includes the most important characteristics which are of
strong impact on satisfaction; Sex, Scientific qualification, position type , position
grade, social status, number of son dependents, age, and years of experience.
The researcher used the descriptive methodology and used the SPSS package to
analyze and experiment the research hypothesis's, paragraphs and data of the
research and extracting the results and recommendations.
The researcher used the questionnaire as study tool to know the data from the
sample of the research in order to collect as much as possible the most
accurate data which will be analyzed to reach to a information which could be used
to design polices and take decisions.
The research population consists (1031) of the Islamic University of Gaza
employees, during the first semester 2008/2009, the research sample formed of
(255) which represent the percentage is 25% of the research population, from the
sample a (240) questionnaires were collected with a percentage of 94% of the
distributed questionnaires.
The research results concluded that the compensations; compensation, the basic
salary, the additions to the basic salary (Allowances), End of service compensation,
incentives, services and advantages are effects significantly the employees of the
Islamic University of Gaza according to the research themes, which include levels of
satisfaction and non-satisfaction, whereas the results concludes very high and high
XVIII
satisfaction concerning more than 30% of the research paragraphs, but also it
concludes a medium and low, very low satisfaction concerning more than 30% of
the research paragraphs, and also it concludes a non- satisfaction about 25% of
the paragraphs, which will contribute to determine the recommendation, which
could be proposed for achieving the goals of improving the employees satisfaction
concerning the compensations.
The results of the research showed the existence of significant differences in the
questionnaired sample of study concerning the effects of the compensations o the
employees satisfaction at the level of significance a=0.05, which attributed to two
personal characteristics only; the sex and the position type.
The research results showed too the existence of non- significant differences in
the questionnaired sample of research concerning the effects of the
compensations o the employees satisfaction at the level of significance a=0.05,
which attributed to two personal characteristics only; the Scientific qualification,
the social status, the number of dependent sons, the position grade and years of
experience.
The research reached to recommendations concerning all the components of the
compensations, which will work on improving the employees compensations
according to their labor and personal characteristics.
XIX

The Research Framework

R.Wayne Mondy & Robert M NOE, 2005

p44, 2005

P191

Job Satisfaction

844 819 -

Robbins, 1998: p45

D.J.CHERRINGTON, 1989, P.308

Single Global Rating

Summation score

Robbins, 1998: p151

Brayfiled-Roth Satisfaction Scale

^`
Job Description IndexJDI
NY

?
Y
Y
Y

Minnesota satisfaction q\QuestionnaireMSQ

.P.VECCBIO, 1991, P.120^`

Motivation

Motivation

Perelson & Steiner, 1964, p97

p44, 2005

p114

Primary Needs

Secondary Needs

Content Theories

Cognitive Theories
process

ERG

X,Y

Content Theories

Maslow's Need Hierarchy Theory

Physiological Needs
Safety Needs

Social Needs

Esteem Needs

Self-Actualization Needs

Alderfer's Modified Need Hierarchy
Alderfer

Existence Needs
Relatedness Needs

Growth needs

ERG

Achievers
p115
Need for Achievement
Need for Power
Need for Affiliation
Herzberg's two-factor theory :
Frederick Herzberg

Maintenance/Hygiene Factor
Motivators

Green, & Daawis weiss, 1986

The process theories of Motivation

The expectancy-Based
Models:

Victor
Vroom

J. Stacey Adams

P369

Goal-setting Theory
(Locke

Vroom

Skinner Pavlov
law of Effects

Skinner

P171

The Compensation

Appelbaum,1996

Mondy &Noe,2005,p285

mondy &
Noe,2005,p285

R.Wayne Mondy & Robert
M NOE,P;325

Mondy, R. Wayne, Noe, Robert M., 2002,P 283)

Mondy, R. Wayne, Noe, Robert M., 2002,P,289)

Mondy, R. Wayne, Noe, Robert M., 2002,P,287)

Ranking method

Mondy, R. Wayne, Noe, Robert M.,
2002,P,287)

Classification method

Mondy & Noe,2005,p295

Benchmarks Jobs

Factor Comparison Method

Benchmarks Jobs)

The Point Method
(Mondy & Noe,2005,p297

R.Wayne Mondy & Robert M NOE, Human Resource Management, Ninth

Edition, Prentice Hall, Person Education International, 2005,p 300
The hay Guide Chart-Profile method

(Hay Plan
Know-How

Know How

Problems Solving
Creating
reasoning

Transparency

Additional Compensable Elements)

Job Hierarchy


Pay Grades

A
B
C

Evaluated points

Pay Ranges for

Pay Grades

wage Curve

Pay grades

R.Wayne Mondy

100-199

200-299

300-399

400-500
& Robert M NOE, Human Resource Management,
Ninth Edition, Prentice Hall, Person Education International, 2005,p 300

Pay Ranges

Mondy & Noe,2005,p300:301
Broadbanding
Broadbanding

GE)

R.Wayne Mondy & Robert M NOE, Human Resource Management,
Ninth Edition, Prentice Hall, Person Education International, 2005,p 300.
Single-rate System

Dale BeachP235
Dimok

P252

P361

The Islamic University of Gaza

.

.
.
.

The Compensation of The IUG

,705

Palestinian
Pension Agency "PPA"

Previous Studies

Previous Studies

t

=

( Jessie L. Grant:2006
" An Examination of the job satisfaction of Mid-level manager in student affairs
Administration, Dissertation Abstract, Western Michigan University, 2006.

Managerial Power, Stock based Incentives Cheo&Pin:2006
& Firm Performance, 2006.

An empirical Investigation of incentives for Campbell:2006

Nonfinancial Performance Improvement, 2006:

Performance Measure Properties & Gibbs,&Others:2004
Incentives, 2004"

Job satisfaction in Radio News If, Electronic Stone:2003)
www.Missouri.Edu, 2003Copy.

"Job satisfaction among US PHD-Moguerou
Graduates- the effects of gender and employment sector, 2002"

Recipients Survey
, Doctorate

Job
satisfaction
of
Professional&
Murray
Paraprofessional among library staff at the University of North Carolina,

1999."

Paul Specters Job
satisfaction Survey

Job satisfaction among support in Michigan Voleck: 1995
Academic Libraries, 1995"

Factors Contributing to job Liacque& Schumacher,1995
Education Vol, 116,Issue,1, Fall, P.11.satisfaction in Higher Education.

"Job satisfaction of faculty from Petty & Hatcher: 1991
technical institutes community colleges & Universities, 1991:

Methodology and Procedures

SPSS

3

,
Example: N=
N=260, a = 0.05, So the sample Volume = 260/260(0.05) +1= 146

SPSS

rr
0.349

0.000
0.657
0.000
0.650
0.000
0.691
0.000
0.661
0.001
0.569

0.003
0.496

0.001
0.541
0.001
0.558
0.000
0.577
0.010
0.444

0.34931r

rr.05
0.349

0.000 0.675

0.000 0.665

0.000 0.620

0.002 0.525

0.002 0.527

0.005 0.474

0.007 0.463
0.001 0.565

r

rr
0.349

0.000
0.726

0.000
0.810

0.000
0.736
0.004
0.491

0.000
0.628

0.000
0.587

r

rr
0.349

0.007
0.461
0.000
0.576
0.000
0.620
0.007
0.459

0.000
0.712
0.044
0.353
0.000
0.716
0.000
0.841
0.009
0.446

0.34931r

rr
0.349

0.012
0.432
0.033
0.372

0.001
0.561

0.022
0.398

0.043
0.354

0.000

0.738

0.000
0.796

0.000
0.765

0.000
0.602

0.34931r

r
0.349r

0.000
0.579
0.000
0.608
0.006
0.470

0.001
0.537

0.000
0.627

0.000
0.593

0.011
0.439
0.000
0.584
0.001
0.554

)
0.000
0.678

0.000
0.640

0.000
0.652
0.000
0.644

0.001
0.567

0.014
0.426
0.005
0.479
0.000
0.656

0.007
0.463

0.34931r

rr
0.349

0.000
0.648
0.000
0.723
0.000
0.576
0.001
0.544
0.001
0.532

0.000
0.691

0.000
0.626
0.000
0.577
0.000
0.577

0.34931r

rr
0.349

0.000
0.591
0.000
0.789
0.002
0.519
0.002
0.512
0.000
0.740

0.000
0.786

0.000
0.635
0.34931r

Split-Half Coefficient

Spearman-Brown Coefficient

2

1

0.8273
0.7054
10
0.8396
0.7235
0.000
0.8244
0.7012

0.000
0.8653
0.7625

0.000
0.8221
0.6980

0.000
0.8133
0.6854
18
0.000
0.8380
0.7211
0.000
0.8416
0.7266
69
0.000

r

Cronbach's alpha

0.8458
10
0.8675
0.8897

0.8987

0.8487

0.8632
18
0.8756
0.8835
69

SPSS
Pearson Correlation Coefficient

Cronbach's Alpha
1- sample K.S)

T

ANOVA

>a

Results and Interpretation of The Research

PCBS

(1- Sample K-S)

sig. 0.05

1-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Z
0.084
1.259
10

0.139
1.154

0.272
0.998

0.924
0.361

0.596
0.869

0.566
0.787
18
0.614
0.758
0.590
0.772
69

T
tt

tt

0.000 19.764
83.06
t

0.883 4.15

0.000 21.126
82.71
0.813 4.14

0.000 16.813
81.14
0.951 4.06
0.000 17.258
78.34
0.804 3.92
0.000 9.157
70.70
0.882 3.54
0.000 -10.870
43.49
1.149 2.17

0.000 4.829
66.72
1.054 3.34

0.000 8.723
72.75
1.106 3.64

0.000 15.054
77.73
0.891 3.89

0.000 5.612
68.77
1.180 3.44
0.000 19.855
71.20
0.427 3.56

t
t

t
a
0.00043.49

t
t.855

a

Campbell,2006

t

0.000 12.451 75.96 0.968 3.80

0.000 5.365
67.63 1.074 3.38
0.001 3.425
65.68 1.254 3.28

t

0.000 16.351 80.09 0.930 4.00
0.000 10.924 74.76 1.022 3.74

0.000 5.667
68.38 1.120 3.42

0.000 27.517 88.73 0.790 4.44

0.000 6.171
69.08 1.114 3.45

0.000 18.959 73.77 0.550 3.69
t
t

t
t

a

Venron:2003

Voleck,1995

Petty & Hatcher,1991

t

0.000 12.332 77.03 1.045 3.85

0.000 10.206 73.60 1.006 3.68

0.000 11.574 74.76 0.965 3.74
0.000 6.828
91.09 3.445 4.55

t
0.000 11.628 76.51 1.074 3.83

0.000 5.498
68.42 1.156 3.42

0.000 15.149 74.10 0.704 3.71
t

t

t
t

a

Agarwal ,2007

Cheo & Pin, 2006

Gibbs& Others,2004

t

0.000 23.170 87.02 0.880 4.35

0.000 20.463 84.37 0.901 4.22

0.000 14.082 78.34 0.985 3.92

0.000 17.419 81.83 0.948 4.09
0.000 9.630
72.23 0.961 3.61
0.748 -0.322
59.48 1.232 2.97
0.000 16.276 80.96 0.974 4.05

0.000 12.272 76.42 1.012 3.82

t
0.000 15.052 78.78 0.944 3.94

0.000 19.600 73.12 0.506 3.66
t

t

t
t

a

t

0.000 8.790
72.31 1.060 3.62
0.000 5.381
67.25 1.019 3.36
0.000 10.710 73.97 0.987 3.70

0.000 10.448 73.89 1.006 3.69

0.000 14.161 77.55 0.938 3.88

0.000 18.783 81.31 0.858 4.07

0.000 23.365 84.19 0.783 4.21

0.000 17.728 80.96 0.895 4.05

0.000 18.534 81.22 0.866 4.06

0.000 24.024 76.96 0.534 3.85
t
t

tt

a

Apprlbaum & Kamal:2000

0.010 -2.604
0.000 7.562
0.000 8.264
t
55.98 1.167 2.80

69.43 0.944 3.47
70.66 0.976 3.53

0.000 11.877 76.16 1.029 3.81

t
0.000 12.991 76.33 0.951 3.82

0.000 13.618 77.12 0.951 3.86
0.000 5.482
67.77 1.073 3.39
0.000 6.174
68.82 1.081 3.44
0.000 4.395
66.11 1.053 3.31

)
0.000 4.889
67.25 1.122 3.36

0.000 11.386 74.67 0.975 3.73

0.000 5.408
68.38 1.173 3.42
0.000 6.041
68.56 1.072 3.43

0.000 21.631 83.32 0.816 4.17

0.727 -0.349
59.48 1.135 2.97
0.000 5.637
67.51 1.008 3.38
0.000 4.321

65.85 1.025 3.29
t

0.000 9.533
71.27 0.894 3.56

0.000 10.535 67.05 0.506 3.35
t

t

tt

a

liacqu,& Schumacher

0.001 3.354
0.026 2.242
t

64.19 0.946 3.21

62.97 1.002 3.15

0.004 2.883
64.19 1.100 3.21

0.000 16.215 78.43 0.860 3.92

0.010 2.612
64.02 1.164 3.20
0.000 9.374
72.49 1.008 3.62
0.000 9.124
70.74 0.891 3.54

0.000 10.721 73.36 0.943 3.67

0.551 0.597
60.79 0.997 3.04

0.000 9.547

67.91 0.627 3.40
.05t
t

3.40
t67.91
t9.547

a

Jessie L. Grant,2006

Baulae Lester 1987

t

t
( One Way ANOVA)

Sig<0.05
Sig<0.01
Sig>0.05
Sig>0.01
Sig<0.05
Sig<0.01
f>f

Sig>0.05
Sig>0.01
f<f
t>t
t<t

0.05

0.000
t
19.855
0.427
3.56
71.20
t
t

3.56
tt

0.05

0.05

0.000
t
18.959
73.77
0.550
3.69
t
t

73.77
tt

0.05

0.05

0.000
t
15.149
0.704
3.71
74.10
t
t

t74.10
t25.500

0.05

0.05

0.000
t
19.600
0.506
3.66
73.12
t
t

tt

0.05

0.05

0.000
t
24.024
76.96
0.534
3.85
t
t

tt

0.05

0.05

0.000
t
10.535
67.05
0.506
3.35

t

t

tt

0.05

0.05

0.000
t
9.547
0.627
3.40
67.91
t
t

tt

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05
t
t

0.544
0.493
0.021
0.000
0.617
0.021
0.088
0.013
t
-0.608
0.687
2.331
3.601
0.501
2.321
1.716
2.506

0.442
3.552
192
0.337
3.599
37
0.567
3.700
192
0.451
3.632
37
0.729
3.752
192
0.502
3.460
37
0.499
3.707
192
0.463
3.388
37
0.540
3.856
192
0.507
3.808
37
0.510
3.386
192

0.453
3.177
37
0.633
3.427
192
0.574
3.234
37
0.356
3.599
192
0.240
3.446
37

t

2.331t.
t

tt

tt

0.05

0.05

0.05

( One Way ANOVA)

0.616
F
0.743
0.136
0.817
0.183
222
40.715
228
41.532
0.821
4.925
0.288
222
63.975
228
68.900
0.181
1.088
0.505
222
112.019
228
113.106
0.521
3.126
0.249
222
55.343
228
58.469
0.608
3.647
0.277
222
0.011
0.904
0.055
0.044
0.349
0.200
0.184
2.848
0.359
2.090
2.197
1.124
1.440
1.485

61.429
228
65.076
0.287
1.722
0.255
222
56.653
228
58.375
0.559
3.355
0.388
222
86.231
228
89.586
0.174
1.044
0.117
222
25.993
228
27.037
F

FF

-0.029

0.124

0.231

0.216

0.203
-0.354
0.354
-0.557
-0.203
-0.014
-0.570*
-0.216
-0.015
-0.029
-0.585*
-0.231
0.108
0.093
0.079
-0.478*
-0.124
0.152
0.260
0.245
0.231
-0.326
0.029
0.056
0.028
0.124
0.069
0.114
-0.491
0.546*
0.519*
0.615*
0.560*
0.605*
0.478
0.326
0.585
-0.231
-0.079
0.029
-0.245
-0.093
0.015
-0.260
-0.108
-0.152
-0.059
-0.086
0.010
-0.013
-0.041
0.055
-0.069
-0.096
0.028
0.096
-0.028
0.069
0.570
0.557
0.014
0.491
-0.605
-0.114
0.045
-0.560*
-0.069
-0.055
-0.010
-0.615*
-0.124
0.041
0.086
-0.519*
-0.028
0.059
-0.056
-0.045
0.013
-0.546

FF

0.05

0.05

0.05

(One Way ANOVA)

F
0.699
0.147 1.934 0.350

F
0.181
226
40.833
228
41.532
2.689
5.378
0.281
226
63.522
228
68.900
0.666
1.332
0.495
226
111.774
228
113.106
1.070
2.141
0.249
226
56.328
228
58.469
0.891
1.781
0.280
226
63.295

228
65.076
0.776
1.552
0.251
226
56.823
228
58.375
2.513
5.025
0.374
226
84.561
228
89.586
0.482
0.964
0.115
226
26.073
228
27.037
0.000 9.567
0.262 1.347
0.015 4.294
0.043 3.180
0.048 3.086
0.001 6.715
0.017 4.176

F

F
F

-0.148
-0.403
-0.196
0.148

0.196
-0.101
-0.075
0.266*
0.191
0.358*
-0.126
0.227*
0.101

-0.271
-0.086
-0.042
-0.358*
0.042

-0.117
0.159*

0.117
*
0.271
0.086

0.126
*

0.075
*

-0.094
-0.191
-0.159
0.094
0.290

-0.256
-0.290
-0.227
0.256
*
0.403*
-0.266

FF

0.05

0.05

0.05

(One Way ANOVA)

F
0.082
0.164
0.183
226
41.368
228
41.532
0.906
0.640 0.447
0.224 1.506 0.453

F
0.301
226
67.994
228
68.900
1.762
3.523
0.485
226
109.583
228
113.106
0.216
0.431
0.257
226
58.038
228
58.469
0.076
0.151
0.287
226
64.925
228
65.076
0.185
0.370
0.257
226
58.005
228
58.375
0.762
1.523
0.390
226
88.063
228
89.586
0.053
0.105
0.119
226
26.932
228
27.037
0.028 3.633
0.433 0.839
0.769 0.263
0.487 0.721
0.144 1.954
0.643 0.442

F

F
F

FF

0.05

0.05

0.05

(One Way ANOVA)

0.230
0.689
0.182
225
40.843
228
41.532
0.448
1.344
0.300
225
67.556
228
68.900
7.833
23.500
0.398
225
89.606
228
113.106
F
0.287 1.265
0.217 1.492
0.000 19.670

0.027
0.082
0.259
225
58.387
228
58.469
0.326
0.979
0.285
225
64.097
228
65.076
0.148
0.443
0.257
225
57.932

228
58.375
0.144
0.433
0.396
225
89.153
228
89.586
0.145
0.435
0.118
225
26.602
228
27.037
F
0.957 0.106
0.331 1.146
0.633 0.574
0.779 0.364
0.301 1.226

F

F
F

*
-0.231
-2.953
0.034
-2.689
2.722*
-2.722*

-0.264

0.264
2.689
2.953*
-0.034
0.231

FF

0.05

0.05

0.05

(One Way ANOVA)

F

F
0.151
0.301
0.182
226
41.231
228
41.532
0.259
0.518
0.303
226
68.382
228
68.900
0.088
0.175
0.500
226
112.931
228
113.106
0.102
0.203
0.258
226
58.266
228
58.469
0.523
1.045
0.283
226
64.031

228
65.076
0.372
0.744
0.255
226
57.631
228
58.375
0.200
0.401
0.395
226
89.185
228
89.586
0.137
0.275
0.118
226
26.762
228
27.037
0.439 0.826
0.426 0.856
0.839 0.175
0.674 0.395
0.161 1.844
0.235 1.458
0.602 0.508
0.315 1.160

F

F
F

FF

0.05

0.05

0.05

( One Way ANOVA)

F
0.589
0.359 1.079 0.196

F
0.182
225
40.943
228
41.532
0.709
2.127
0.297
225
66.773
228
68.900
1.078
3.233
0.488
225
109.873
228
113.106
0.129
0.388
0.258
225
58.081
228
58.469
0.354
1.062
0.285
225
64.014

228
65.076
0.057
0.171
0.259
225
58.204
228
58.375
0.329
0.987
0.394
225
88.599
228
89.586
0.082
0.245
0.119
225
26.792
228
27.037
0.070 2.389
0.088 2.207
0.682 0.501
0.294 1.245
0.882 0.220
0.476 0.835
0.562 0.685

2253F

FF

FF

0.05

0.05

0.05

( One Way ANOVA)

F
0.007
0.020
0.184
225
41.512
228
41.532
0.465
1.396
0.300
225
67.504
228
68.900
0.127
0.380
0.501
225
112.727
228
113.106
0.350
1.051
0.255
225
57.418
228
58.469
0.082
0.247
0.288
225
64.830

228
65.076
0.104
0.312
0.258
225
58.063
228
58.375
0.158
0.475
0.396
225
89.111
228
89.586
0.007
0.022
0.120
225
27.015
228
27.037
0.991 0.035
0.202 1.551
0.860 0.253
0.252 1.373
0.836 0.285
0.751 0.402
0.753 0.400
0.981 0.060

2253F

F
F

FF

0.05

0.05

Conclusions and Recommendations

a=0.05

0.05

a=0.05

a=0.05

.8

References List

P117

P176

www.iugaza.edu.ps
www.alazhar.edu.ps
www.birzeit.edu.ps
WWW.diwan.ps

9/2/1.Books:
1. Agarwa1, R. O.,
1982.
"Organization & Management", New Delhi, McGraw, -Hill,
2. Dessler, Gary, Human Resource Management, Eighth Edition, Prentice Hall,

2000.
3. Gibson, James John Ivacenvich & James I-I Donnelly, "Organization:
Behavior, Structure, Process", 3 rd edition, Irwin, 1994.
4. Leoplod,John, 2002
5. LOCK, EA., "The Nature and causes of Job Satisfaction in Dun tee", Rand
McNally, 1976.
6. Luthans, Fred, " Organizational", 3 I'd edition, McGraw, Hall Hill Inc, New
York, 1994.
7. Milton, C., "Human Behavior In Organization", Englewood diffs, NH,
Prentice Hall Inc., 1981.
8. Perelson & Steiner, "Human Behavior: An Inventory of Scientific Finding",
New York, Harcourt Brace, 1964.

9. R.Wayne Mondy & Robert M NOE, Human Resource Management, Ninth
Edition, Prentice Hall, Person Education International, 2005.
10.Robbins, 1998,
11.Robert M, FlumeI, " The New Management, 3 I'd edition, London,
Macluillan, 1983.
12.Robert, Kreinter,& Angelo, Kinick, " Organizational Behavior", 5 I'd
edition, Irwin, McGraw, , 2001.
13.Stephen Robbins, "Organizational Behavior", Prentice Hall International, 8th
edition, 1998.
9/2/2. Periodicals:
1. Campbell, D. "An Empirical Investigation of Incentives for Nonfinancial
Performance Improvement", Harvard Business School, 2006.
2. Choe,Ch. & Pin, Yin, X. , " Managerial Power, Stock Based Incentives, &
Firm Performance", University of New South Wales, 2006.
3. Gibbs, M. et al.. & Others, " Performance Measure Properties & Incentives",
Institute for the Study of Lab or, No. 1356,2004.
4. Jessie L. Grant, 2006. " An Examination of the job satisfaction of Mid-level
manager in student affairs Administration, Dissertation Abstract, Western
Michigan University, 2006.
5. Julie Voelck, "Job satisfaction among support in Michigan academic
libraries''', coll.& Res. Libs, 1995.
6. Liacque& Schumacher, Factors Contributing to job satisfaction in Higher
Education. Education Vol, 116,Issue,1, Fall, P.11.1995.
7. Moguerou, Philip, " Job satisfaction Among US PhD-Graduates-the effects of
gender and employment
sector paper www.google.com/pdf, 2002.
8. Murray, 1999, "Satisfaction of professional & para professional among library

staff at the University of North Carolina ", at chaplet-Hill Master publish.
paper www.google.com/pdf, 1999.
9. petty, G. & Hatcher, L.M., "Job satisfaction of faculty from Technical institutes
Community Colleges & Universities ",Journal of studies In technical Cancers, 1991.
10.Vernon Stone, " Job satisfaction in Radio News If, Electronic Copy.
www.Missouri.Edu, 2003.

Subject: Research Questionnaire\ The Impacts of The Compensations on The
Employees Satisfaction of the Islamic University in Gaza

Subject: Research Questionnaire\ The Impacts of The Compensations on The

Employees Satisfaction of the Islamic University in Gaza-Gaza Strip

Grade Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7 Step 8 Step
Step
Year INC(27) INC(22) INC(20) INC(17) INC(15) INC(11) INC(9) INC(8) 9A
9B
INC(7) INC(7)
1
1240
1018
838
685
550
461
380
300
355
250
2
1267
1040
858
702
565
472
389
308
362
257
1294
1062
878
719
580
483
398
316
369
264
1321
1084
898
736
595
494
407
324
376
271
1348
1106
918
753
610
505
416
332
383
278
1375
1128
938
770
625
516
425
340
390
285
1402
1150
958
787
640
527
434
348
397
292
1429
1172
978
804
655
538
443
356
404
299
1456
1194
998
821
670
549
452
364
411
306
10
1483
1216
1018
838
685
560
461
372
418
313
11
1510
1238
1038
855
700
571
470
380
425
320
12
1537
1260
1058
872
715
582
479
388
432
327
13
1564
1282
1078
889
730
593
488
396
439
334
14
1591
1304
1098
906
745
604
497
404
446
341
15
1618
1326
1118
923
760
615
506
412
453
348
16
1645
1348
1138
940
775
626
515
420
460
355
17
1672
1370
1158
957
790
637
524
428
467
362
18
1699
1392
1178
974
805
648
533
436
474
369
19
1726
1414
1198
991
820
659
542
444
481
376
20
1753
1436
1218
1008
835
670
551
452
488
383
21
1780
1458
1238
1025
850
681
560
460
495
390
22
1807
1480
1258
1042
865
692
569
468
502
397
23
1834
1502
1278
1059
880
703
578
476
509
404
24
1861
1524
1298
1076
895
714
587
484
516
411
25
1888
1546
1318
1093
910
725
596
492
523
418

Grade
Year
1
Step 1
INC(32)
1320
Step 2
INC(27)
1089
Step 3
INC(25)
888
Step 4
INC(20)
713
Step 5
INC(19)
555
1352
1116
913
733
574
1384
1143
938
753
593
1416
1170
963
773
612
1448
1197
988
793
631
1480
1224
1013
813
650
1512
1251
1038
833
669
1544
1278
1063
853
688
1576
1305
1088
873
707
10
1608
1332
1113
893
726
11
1640
1359
1138
913
745
12
1672
1386
1163
933
764
13
1704
1413
1188
953
783
14
1736
1440
1213
973
802
15
1768
1467
1238
993
821
16
1800
17
1832
18
1864
19
1896
20
1928
21
1960
22
1992
23
2024
24
2056
25
2088
_

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

PCBS

)

HBV

Compensation PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Compensation PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

 



1-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov 

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

( One Way ANOVA)

 

Minnesota satisfaction q\Questionnaire MSQ

Content Theories 

The process theories of Motivation

J. Stacey Adams

Factor Comparison Method

R.Wayne Mondy & Robert M NOE, Human Resource Management, Ninth 

The hay Guide Chart-Profile method 

 Pay Grades 

Pay Ranges for

Ninth Edition, Prentice Hall, Person Education International, 2005,p 300

  

  

An empirical Investigation of incentives for  Campbell:2006 

 Murray 

Paraprofessional among library staff at the University of North Carolina,

N=260, a = 0.05, So the sample Volume = 260/260(0.05) +1= 146

 Pearson Correlation Coefficient 

0.000 12.451 75.96 0.968 3.80

67.63 1.074 3.38

65.68 1.254 3.28

68.38 1.120 3.42

69.08 1.114 3.45

0.000 18.959 73.77 0.550 3.69

0.000 12.332 77.03 1.045 3.85

91.09 3.445 4.55

0.000 11.628 76.51 1.074 3.83

68.42 1.156 3.42 

0.000 15.149 74.10 0.704 3.71

Gibbs& Others,2004

0.000 20.463 84.37 0.901 4.22



72.23 0.961 3.61

59.48 1.232 2.97

0.000 16.276 80.96 0.974 4.05

0.000 15.052 78.78 0.944 3.94

0.000 19.600 73.12 0.506 3.66

72.31 1.060 3.62

67.25 1.019 3.36

0.000 10.710 73.97 0.987 3.70

0.000 17.728 80.96 0.895 4.05

0.000 18.534 81.22 0.866 4.06

0.000 24.024 76.96 0.534 3.85

55.98 1.167 2.80

0.000 12.991 76.33 0.951 3.82

67.77 1.073 3.39

68.82 1.081 3.44

66.11 1.053 3.31

67.25 1.122 3.36

0.000 11.386 74.67 0.975 3.73

68.38 1.173 3.42

68.56 1.072 3.43

0.000 21.631 83.32 0.816 4.17

1-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov

Minnesota satisfaction q\QuestionnaireMSQ

Content Theories

The process theories of Motivation

Factor Comparison Method

R.Wayne Mondy & Robert M NOE, Human Resource Management, Ninth

The hay Guide Chart-Profile method

Pay Grades

An empirical Investigation of incentives for Campbell:2006

Murray

Pearson Correlation Coefficient

68.42 1.156 3.42

liacqu,& Schumacher

( One Way ANOVA)

P117