Masters of Educational Technology Program University of British Columbia Kimberly Wagner Professor Jennifer Shapka September 9, 2011 My personal learning theory according to the TPI appears invalid. There is not much variation between the scores of all theories except Social Reform; the beliefs, intent and action scores have great variation; and no theory is above the dominant threshold. There is, however, an explanation for my results which represents my views. Firstly, I strongly believe in Maslows Hierarchy of Need: without the basic needs to survive, a safe and loving home, and self-esteem, the students will not be ready to learn. When those prerequisites have been satisfied outside of school, they will have learning readiness at school. If students are consumed with those other aspects of life, for example, the lack of food or a poor emotional environment at home, they will not be ready to learn. The classroom then must be a safe, nurturing environment to be an optimal learning environment; thus, making the classroom a respectful environment where students are given positive feedback as part of their learning will result in an even greater desire to learn. Next, I believe that Transmission and Apprenticeship are of equally great importance to the learning process. There will always be information that needs to be acquired prior to delving deeper into a learning topic, and transmission is an effective way of imparting that knowledge quickly, allowing students to ask clarifying questions, and for the teacher to test the understanding of that knowledge; however, there will also be skills to acquire that must be practiced for the student to gain greater competency. The hands-on practice consolidates the skill(s) being learned. Finally, it cannot be ignored that children have developmental growth
2 stages that must be interpreted to determine learning readiness, so it needs to be a consideration in cross-grade curriculum planning. My personal learning theory is a blend of four theories!