anda weft wert sites kmo Ta: 8-881-2520750 (e9e tae ed conn area, area TT) ee NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ee (Micisty of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of cia} ae aoe Webteenaarg wftatser erate yar, ato Project Implementation Unit, Bareilly 25, ft or, Atamgy te, weft - 243006 (er) 2, Green Park, Boesalpur Rod, Barelly- 243008 (U.P) 11006/1/2013/PIU-Brly/ 3122 Dated 12.03.2014 To, Authorized Signatory, M/S VIL Limited B-5/21, Vishal Khand, Lucknow-226010, ‘Sub:Two laning with paved shoulders of Sitarganj-Bareilly section of NH-74 (New NH-30) from Km 254.820 to Km 329,280 in the state of Uttarakhand & Uttar Pradesh under NHDP-IV on EPC Mode. -Approval of Proof consultant. Reft 1. VIL Letter No. VIL/STR-BLY/NH-74(30)/CAMP/06 dated 13.02.2014. 2. VIL Letter No. VIL/STR-BLY/NH-74(30)/CAMP/07 dated 13.02.2014 3. This office letter No.11006/1/2013/PIU-Brly/3126 dated 01.03.2014. 4. VIL Letter No. VIL/STR-BRLY/NH-74(30) /EPC/225 dated 08.03.2014, Sir, Please refer above citied letters regarding approval of proof consultant & safety consultants as per clause 10.2.2 & clause 10.1.5 respectively. The panel submitted ‘to this office vide letter at Sr. No. 1 & 2 was rejected as per reasons defined in letter at Sr. No. 3. 2. The revised panel submitted vide letter at Sr. No. 4 is scrutinized and following observations were observ a) Company profiles of both companies .¢. M/s Khaira & Associates and M/s Thoughts consultants Pvt. Ltd, reflects that both the companies don't postes experience related to major highway projectswthey have served only for State Government projects of very smaller magnitude, b) In case of M/s Kharia & Associates and M/s Thoughts consultants Pvt. Ltd empanelinent of MoRTH is not attached and in case of M/s DATA TECHNOSYS (ENGINEERS) PyT. UTD, an undertaking is given by contractor that company was already empanelment with MoRTH and they have again applied for renewal of empanelment. ©) None of the company in the submitted panel is eligible for safety consultant since they did not poses experience as a safety consultant in proper for any of the BOT (PPP) project or BOQ project or EPC project. \eSiah Cr WiA raey HEIRS. 0s cd, eet 10, arom, of Ree 110 o76 aha orvastravgolaca @arw avi RORY Head Ofice G5 & 6, Sector 10, Dwar, New Dell- 110075, Tel -o11-250741001 200 Fal sb1 it sonoosnyS. Thus, considering above observations and undertaking provided by Contractor for M/s DATA TECHNOSYS (ENGINEERS) PVT. LTD, and also considering Previous empanelment with MoRTH, the M/s DATA TECHNOSYS (ENGINEERS) PVT. LTD, is approved as *Proof Consultant’ for this Project, provided the empanelment certificate is to be produce by contractor to this office as committed. 4. Also for appointment of safety consultant, it is again advised to the contractor that a revised panel of firms should be submitted to this office having ‘appropriate experience as safety consultant and empanelled with MoRTH. (c6/.s.Puri) General Manager & Projéct Director Copy to: Following for information:- 1. Chief General Cum Regional Officer, NHAI, Lucknow, 2. Sh. RK. Jha T.L. cum Sr. Highway Engineer, M/s SA Infrastructure Consultants Pvt. Ltd. E-15 Vasundhara Colony Philbhit- 262001. Genera anager & £ 1. Sieh ere na usc,